Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 75
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 17(2): e0264221, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35180276

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Most studies examining complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) stakeholder engagement with evidence-based practice have relied on quantitative research methods, which often fail to capture the nuances of this phenomena. Using qualitative methods, this study aimed to explore the experiences of CAM stakeholders regarding the barriers and enablers to the conduct and application of research. METHODS: This research was guided by a qualitative descriptive framework. CAM practitioners and researchers of multiple CAM disciplines from across Australia and New Zealand were invited to share their personal perspectives of the study phenomena. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via Zoom, which were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Rigour strategies were applied to ensure the credibility of results. The transcript was analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: CAM stakeholders identified an array of barriers and enablers to the conduct and application of research within their disciplines. The barriers and enablers that emerged were found to be inter-connected with two similar constructs: capacity and culture. Captured within the construct of capacity were five themes-lack of resources, inadequate governance/leadership, lack of competency, bias directed from outside and within CAM, and lack of time for research. Within the construct of culture were two themes-intrinsic perceptions in CAM, and lack of communication within and outside CAM. CONCLUSIONS: Promoting evidence-based practice and engaging with research in CAM continues to face challenges. This study, for the first time, has highlighted the multitude of interlinked barriers that confront CAM stakeholders when engaging with research. These findings highlight the need for a concerted and targeted approach to tackle these challenges.


Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies/psychology , Stakeholder Participation , Attitude , Australia , Biomedical Research/organization & administration , Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , Causality , Complementary Therapies/organization & administration , Complementary Therapies/statistics & numerical data , Humans , New Zealand
2.
Eur J Cancer ; 157: 301-305, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34555649

ABSTRACT

Countless biomarkers continue to be identified and analysed in the modern era of omics focused research, with innumerable articles purporting clinical utility and bolstering optimism for truly personalised cancer care. While many commentaries have expounded on the complexities of biomarker development, validation and reporting, the monumental challenge of integrating this research into clinical practice has to date received little attention. The challenges are multitude; variable and sometimes contradictory findings across studies for individual biomarkers, a rapidly evolving landscape with new biomarkers continually being presented and tendency to examine each biomarker in isolation. Here, using examples from colorectal cancer, we explore the difficulties for the practicing clinician in interpreting and integrating novel biomarkers. Here, we present the '4Cs' to interrogate the biomarker literature, including analysis of the credibility, consistency, completeness and context of the biomarker research, and suggest a framework to frame the literature moving forward.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Data Accuracy , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/trends , Humans , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends
3.
BMC Complement Med Ther ; 21(1): 185, 2021 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34210316

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Traditional, complementary, alternative and integrative medicine (TCAIM) can be described as diverse medical and healthcare interventions, practices, products, or disciplines that are not considered as part of conventional medicine. Inherent in its definition, TCAIMs are comprised of a wide variety of therapies with highly variable safety and effectiveness evidence profiles. Despite this, the use of many TCAIMs is highly prevalent among patients globally. The present study consists of a bibliometric analysis of TCAIM journals. METHODS: A single search of all International Standard Serial Number (ISSNs) of all journals categorized as "complementary and alternative medicine" (code 2707) based on the All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) was run on Scopus on April 17, 2021. All publication types were included; no further search limits were applied. The following bibliometric data were collected: number of publications (in total and per year), authors and journals; open access status; journals publishing the highest volume of literature and their impact factors; language, countries, institutional affiliations, and funding sponsors of publications; most productive authors; and highest-cited publications. Trends associated with this subset of publications were identified and presented. Bibliometric indicators of production were calculated, and bibliometric networks were constructed and visualized using the software tool VOSviewer. RESULTS: A total of 172,466 publications (42,331 open access), were published by 219,680 authors in 143 journals from 1938 to 2021. Since the 1940s, an upward trend with respect to the volume of publications can be observed, with a steep increase observed between the mid-2000s and mid-2010s. The journal that published the largest number of publications was the Journal of Natural Products (n = 15,144). The most productive countries included China (n = 45,860), the United States (n = 29,523), and Germany (n = 10,120); a number of the most common institutional affiliations and funding sponsors also originated from these three countries. CONCLUSIONS: The number of publications collectively published in TCAIM journals follows an upward trend. Given a high prevalence of TCAIM use among patients, increased acceptance of TCAIM among conventional healthcare providers, and growing interest in the research of TCAIM, future work should continue to investigate and track changes in the publication characteristics of the emerging research on this topic.


Subject(s)
Bibliometrics , Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , Integrative Medicine , Publishing/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Periodicals as Topic/statistics & numerical data
4.
Mol Oncol ; 15(5): 1277-1288, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33734563

ABSTRACT

There is a persistent variation in cancer outcomes among and within European countries suggesting (among other causes) inequalities in access to or delivery of high-quality cancer care. European policy (EU Cancer Mission and Europe's Beating Cancer Plan) is currently moving towards a mission-oriented approach addressing these inequalities. In this study, we used the quantitative and qualitative data of the Organisation of European Cancer Institutes' Accreditation and Designation Programme, relating to 40 large European cancer centres, to describe their current compliance with quality standards, to identify the hallmarks common to all centres and to show the distinctive features of Comprehensive Cancer Centres. All Comprehensive Cancer Centres and Cancer Centres accredited by the Organisation of European Cancer Institutes show good compliance with quality standards related to care, multidisciplinarity and patient centredness. However, Comprehensive Cancer Centres on average showed significantly better scores on indicators related to the volume, quality and integration of translational research, such as high-impact publications, clinical trial activity (especially in phase I and phase IIa trials) and filing more patents as early indicators of innovation. However, irrespective of their size, centres show significant variability regarding effective governance when functioning as entities within larger hospitals.


Subject(s)
Cancer Care Facilities , Neoplasms/therapy , Quality of Health Care , Academies and Institutes/standards , Academies and Institutes/statistics & numerical data , Biomedical Research/organization & administration , Biomedical Research/standards , Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , Cancer Care Facilities/organization & administration , Cancer Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Cohort Studies , Europe/epidemiology , Humans , Medical Oncology/standards , Medical Oncology/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/standards , Patient Care Team/statistics & numerical data , Patient-Centered Care/organization & administration , Patient-Centered Care/standards , Patient-Centered Care/statistics & numerical data , Translational Research, Biomedical/methods , Translational Research, Biomedical/organization & administration , Translational Research, Biomedical/statistics & numerical data
5.
Front Public Health ; 8: 477, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32923422

ABSTRACT

Background: As an emerging infectious disease, COVID-19 has garnered great research interest. We aimed to explore the differences between English language and Chinese language Medical/Scientific journals publications, particularly aiming to explore the efficacy/contents of the literature published in English and Chinese in relation to the outcomes of management and characterization of COVID-19 during the early stage of COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Publications on COVID-19 research were retrieved from both English and Chinese databases. Bibliometric analyses were performed using VOSviewer 1.6.14, and CiteSpace V software. Network maps were generated to evaluate the collaborations between different authors, countries/provinces, and institutions. Results: A total of 143 English and 721 Chinese original research articles and reviews on COVID-19 were included in our study. Most of the authors and institutions of the papers were from China before March 1st, 2020, however, the distribution of authors and institutions were mainly in developed countries or more wealthy areas of China. The range of the keywords in English publications was more extensive than those in Chinese. Traditional Chinese Medicine was seen more frequently in Chinese papers than in English. Of the 143 articles published in English, 54 articles were published by Chinese authors only and 21 articles were published jointly by Chinese and other overseas authors. Conclusions: The publications in English have enabled medical practitioners and scientists to share/exchange information, while on the other hand, the publications in the Chinese language have provided complementary educational approaches for the local medical practitioners to understand the essential and key information to manage COVID-19 in the relatively remote regions of China, for the general population with a general level of education.


Subject(s)
Bibliometrics , Biomedical Research , COVID-19 , Language , Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans
6.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32391438

ABSTRACT

Background: It is imperative that researchers studying medical tourism connect their work with policy, so that its real-world challenges can be better understood, and more effectively addressed. This article gauges the scope and evolution of policy thinking in medical tourism research through a bibliometric review of published academic literature, to establish the extent to which researchers apply public policy theories and frameworks in their investigation of medical tourism, or consider the policy imperatives of their work. Methods: A Boolean search of the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection was performed to identify policy-related publications on medical tourism. We analyzed the results using bibliometrics and a data visualization software called VOSviewer to identify patterns in knowledge production and underlying network linkages in policy research on the subject. Results: Our findings suggest that only a small proportion of medical tourism research explicitly addresses policy issues or applies policy paradigms in their study approach. Field-specialized journals serving practitioners publish less research as compared to interdisciplinary social and health policy journals. Moreover, there are significant geographical and disciplinary disparities in the policy-orientation of research, and a predilection towards select policy areas such as reproductive and transplant tourism to the neglect of more holistic governance and health system considerations. Conclusion: This article is a call to action for greater engagement by policy scholars on medical tourism, and for health researchers to more explicitly consider how their research might contribute to the understanding and resolution of contemporary policy challenges of medical tourism. Failure to clearly and consistently make the policy connection is a lost opportunity for researchers to frame the public debate, and influence policy thinking on medical tourism.


Subject(s)
Bibliometrics , Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , Health Policy , Medical Tourism/statistics & numerical data
7.
BMC Cancer ; 20(1): 486, 2020 May 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32471384

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Thousands of research articles on neuroblastoma have been published over the past few decades; however, the heterogeneity and variable quality of scholarly data may challenge scientists or clinicians to survey all of the available information. Hence, holistic measurement and analyzation of neuroblastoma-related literature with the help of sophisticated mathematical tools could provide deep insights into global research performance and the collaborative architectonical structure within the neuroblastoma scientific community. In this scientometric study, we aim to determine the extent of the scientific output related to neuroblastoma research between 1980 and 2018. METHODS: We applied novel scientometric tools, including Bibliometrix R package, biblioshiny, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace IV for comprehensive science mapping analysis of extensive bibliographic metadata, which was retrieved from the Web of ScienceTM Core Collection database. RESULTS: We demonstrate the enormous proliferation of neuroblastoma research during last the 38 years, including 12,435 documents published in 1828 academic journals by 36,908 authors from 86 different countries. These documents received a total of 316,017 citations with an average citation per document of 28.35 ± 7.7. We determine the proportion of highly cited and never cited papers, "occasional" and prolific authors and journals. Further, we show 12 (13.9%) of 86 countries were responsible for 80.4% of neuroblastoma-related research output. CONCLUSIONS: These findings are crucial for researchers, clinicians, journal editors, and others working in neuroblastoma research to understand the strengths and potential gaps in the current literature and to plan future investments in data collection and science policy. This first scientometric study of global neuroblastoma research performance provides valuable insight into the scientific landscape, co-authorship network architecture, international collaboration, and interaction within the neuroblastoma community.


Subject(s)
Bibliometrics , Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , Metadata/statistics & numerical data , Neuroblastoma , Child , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Humans
9.
Phytomedicine ; 68: 153190, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32109739

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A growing number of studies have been focused on the medicinal potential of natural products since 1962, while few scholars have analyzed the existing documents comprehensively. PURPOSE: Aiming to visualize the researches on toxicology and pharmacology of natural products (TPNP) published between 1962 and 2018, as well as to reveal their spatiotemporal patterns, a scientometric analysis with 3210 relevant documents collected from Web of Science was conducted in this study. RESULTS: The most prominent contributors of TPNP research are mainly from the USA, China, Brazil, India and Germany. The knowledge domains of TPNP research focus mainly on the topics of (1) traditional Chinese medicine, (2) richardia grandiflora, (3) chemical conversion, (4) new generation, (5) modern medicine, (6) intelligent mixture, (7) hplc-based activity. Most countries have recognized the pharmaceutical potential of natural products, and have paid more attention to the pharmacological and toxicological characteristics of natural products in the past decade. Future TPNP research tends to focus more on complex analysis of mechanisms for diseases treatment, such as toxicology and pharmacology. CONCLUSION: This research has firstly demonstrated a comprehensive knowledge map for the existing toxicological and pharmacological researches of natural products, which offered essential instructions on medical application of natural products to future research.


Subject(s)
Biological Products/pharmacology , Biological Products/toxicity , Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , Brazil , China , Germany , Humans , India , Medicine, Chinese Traditional , Software , Spatio-Temporal Analysis
10.
PLoS One ; 15(1): e0226392, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31967992

ABSTRACT

We use a globally unique dataset that scores every individual academic's holistic research performance in New Zealand to test several common explanations for the gender pay gap in universities. We find a man's odds of being ranked professor or associate professor are more than double a woman's with similar recent research score, age, field, and university. We observe a lifetime gender pay gap of ~NZ$400,000, of which research score and age explain less than half. Our ability to examine the full spectrum of research performance allows us to reject the 'male variability hypothesis' theory that the preponderance of men amongst the 'superstars' explains the lifetime performance pay gap observed. Indeed women whose research career trajectories resemble men's still get paid less than men. From 2003-12, women at many ranks improved their research scores by more than men, but moved up the academic ranks more slowly. We offer some possible explanations for our findings, and show that the gender gap in universities will never disappear in most academic fields if current hiring practices persist.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Salaries and Fringe Benefits/statistics & numerical data , Sexism/statistics & numerical data , Task Performance and Analysis , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Career Mobility , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New Zealand , Universities
11.
Scand J Public Health ; 48(6): 609-616, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30973059

ABSTRACT

Aim: The aim of this study is to analyse the development of Scandinavian research on complementary and alternative medicine in terms of publication pattern and general content. Furthermore we will map research networks. Methods and data: This study is based on bibliometric methods. The dataset consists of 1441 publications with at least one author with a Scandinavian address and/or organisational affiliation, from 2005-2017, in Medline and Web of Science. Results and conclusions: Complementary and alternative medicine is a small and moderately growing research field in Scandinavia, with an average of 120 publications per year. The largest sub-term is integrative and complementary medicine, but the majority of documents are classified as other medical sub-fields. A similar pattern is found regarding the sources. The Medical Subject Heading classifications of the documents and the author keywords indicate that much of the relevant research takes a general focus on complementary and alternative medicine. Regarding specific therapies, mind-body and sensory art therapies are particularly prominent in the material. Various aspects of pain, mental health and gynaecology are recurrent health issues. In total, 31.5% of the publications are classified as clinical trials. The organisations referenced most frequently in the material are Karolinska Institutet and UiT Tromsö and it is clear the research is based at large universities and university hospitals. The research networks have relatively different profiles and collaborate with both Scandinavian and international organisations.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , Complementary Therapies/statistics & numerical data , Bibliometrics , Humans , Scandinavian and Nordic Countries
12.
Soc Work Health Care ; 58(9): 839-853, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31549931

ABSTRACT

Two paradigms are used to define disability. On the one hand, the biological paradigm, which attends to a person's deficiencies and difficulties. And, on the other hand, the social, which does not treat disability as a pathology, but rather places the focus of interest on the deficient tools that society has to consider the capabilities of everyone. This article analyzes the scientific production on disability and social work, using bibliometric techniques and algorithms for the detection of communities, taking into account the current state of research worldwide. This analysis offers a holistic view of the characteristics of the work carried out in the world on this subject.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , Disabled Persons , Social Work/statistics & numerical data , Bibliometrics , Disability Studies , Global Health , Humans
13.
Integr Cancer Ther ; 18: 1534735419846401, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31046482

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of cancer has increased over time worldwide. Nevertheless, the number of deaths has been reduced during the past 2 decades. Thus, one-third of the cancer patients are users of complementary and alternative therapies, looking for other types of interventions. The main aim of the present study is to understand the current status of the research in integrative and complementary oncology. Three different aspects were analyzed: production trends, country collaboration, and leading research topics. METHODS: The dataset was obtained from the documents indexed under the Integrative and Complementary Medicine category of the Web of Science database from 1976 to 2017. VOSviewer and SciMAT software were employed to perform the bibliometric analysis. RESULTS: The Journal of Ethnopharmacology, China Medical University and the People's Republic of China are the leading producers in the field. Regarding the collaboration, the United States and China present a close connection. The scientific community is focused on the following topics: apoptosis, breast cancer, oxidative stress, chemotherapy, and nuclear factor-Kappa-B (NF-Kappa-B). CONCLUSIONS: The present article shows potentially important information that allows understanding of the past, present, and future of research in integrative and complementary oncology. It is a useful evidence-based framework on which to base future research actions and academic directions.


Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies/statistics & numerical data , Medical Oncology/statistics & numerical data , Bibliometrics , Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , Databases, Factual , Humans , Prevalence
14.
Child Care Health Dev ; 45(4): 473-490, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31041806

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The "F-words in childhood disability" (function, family, fitness, fun, friends, and future) were introduced in a concept paper in 2012 entitled, "The F-words in childhood disability: I swear this is how we should think!". The "F-words" are grounded in, and aim to operationalize, the World Health Organization's (World Health Organization, 2001) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. A citation analysis was conducted to explore the extent of research uptake of the "F-words" concepts. METHODS: Three databases-Google Scholar, Wiley Online, and Web of Science-were searched from July 2012 to December 2018 for sources that cited the original F-words paper. Dates of publication and countries of first authors were extracted from all cited articles, and a taxonomy was developed to categorize the type of usage. RESULTS: The search yielded 157 sources from 26 countries, and the number of citations has continued to increase since the paper's publication. Sources were placed into three categories: cited/referenced (n = 109; i.e., the paper was simply cited), integrated/informed (n = 36; i.e., the F-words were stated within the text), and non-English (n = 12). Of the 36 integrated/informed sources, 34 (94.4%) applied the F-words to the ICF framework and five themes emerged with respect to the use of the F-words: (a) support of a holistic approach to childhood disability, (b) association of the F-words to physical activity and rehabilitation, (c) application and measurement of quality of life, (d) F-words research team-related papers, and (e) "other" category. CONCLUSION: This citation analysis shows that the F-words are mainly being used to operationalize the ICF, support a holistic approach to childhood disability, and inform physical activity and rehabilitation-based interventions. These perspectives will play an important role in informing the next steps with respect to moving the F-words into research and practice.


Subject(s)
Bibliometrics , Disability Evaluation , Disabled Children/rehabilitation , Abbreviations as Topic , Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , Child , Disabled Children/psychology , Exercise , Health Status Indicators , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Journal Impact Factor , Quality of Life
15.
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy ; 14(1): 21, 2019 05 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31101059

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Globally, substance use disorders are prevalent and remain an intractable public health problem for health care systems. This study aims to provide a global picture of substance use disorders research. METHODS: The Web of Science platform was used to perform a cross-sectional analysis of scientific articles on substance use disorders and treatment. Characteristics of publication volume, impact, growth, authors, institutions, countries, and journals were examined using descriptive analysis and network visualization graphs. RESULTS: Thirteen thousand six hundred eighty-five papers related to illicit drugs (5403), tobacco (4469), and alcohol (2137) use disorders and treatment were published between 1971 and 2017. The number of publications on Mindfulness and Digital medicine topics had the highest increase with more than 300% since 2003-2007 despite later presence than other methods. The number of papers on other non-pharmaceutical therapies (behavioral therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, skills training or motivational interviewing) grew gradually, however, the growth rate was lower every 5-year period. The United States is the substance use disorder research hub of the world with the highest volume of publications (8232 or 60.2%) and total citations (252,935 or 65.2%), number of prolific authors (25 of top 30 or 83%) and institutions (24 of top 26 or 92%), formed the most international research partnerships (with 96 distinct countries). The international collaboration followed a pattern based on geographic proximity and cultural similarity. CONCLUSIONS: This study offers a comprehensive picture of the global trend of publications of substance use disorder. Findings suggest a need for research policy that supports the examination of interventions that culturally adhere to different local contexts to address substance use disorder in communities.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , Internationality , Periodicals as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Biomedical Research/trends , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Periodicals as Topic/trends
16.
J Altern Complement Med ; 25(2): 141-168, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30785315

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the current state of the research evidence for whole-system, multi-modality naturopathic medicine. DESIGN: A systematic search for research articles from around the world was undertaken using MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, and WHO regional indexes. Naturopathic journals and gray literature were hand searched. No language restrictions were imposed. INTERVENTIONS: All human research evaluating the effectiveness of naturopathic medicine, where two or more naturopathic modalities are delivered by naturopathic clinicians, were included in the review. Case studies of five or more cases were included. RESULTS: Thirty-three published studies (n = 9859) met inclusion criteria (11 American; 4 Canadian; 6 German; 7 Indian; 3 Australian; 1 United Kingdom; and 1 Japanese) across a range of mainly chronic clinical conditions. The studies predominantly showed evidence for the efficacy of naturopathic medicine for the conditions and settings in which they were based. CONCLUSIONS: To date, research in whole-system, multi-modality naturopathic medicine shows that it is effective for treating cardiovascular disease, musculoskeletal pain, type 2 diabetes, polycystic ovary syndrome, depression, anxiety, and a range of complex chronic conditions.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , Naturopathy/statistics & numerical data , Global Health , Humans
17.
J Surg Res ; 236: 92-100, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30694784

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to examine the influence of Surgical Society Oncology (SSO) membership and National Cancer Institute (NCI) status on the academic output of surgical faculty. METHODS: NCI cancer program status for each department of surgery was identified with publically available data, whereas SSO membership was determined for every faculty member. Academic output measures such as NIH funding, publications, and citations were analyzed in subsets by the type of cancer center (NCI comprehensive cancer center [CCC]; NCI cancer center [NCICC]; and non-NCI center) and SSO membership status. RESULTS: Of the surgical faculty, 2537 surgeons (61.9%) were from CCC, whereas 854 (20.8%) were from NCICC. At the CCC, 22.7% of surgeons had a history of or current NIH funding, compared with 15.8% at the NCICC and 11.8% at the non-NCI centers. The academic output of SSO members was higher at NCICC (52 ± 113 publications/1266 ± 3830 citations) and CCC (53 ± 92/1295 ± 4001) compared with nonmembers (NCICC: 26 ± 78/437 ± 2109; CCC: 37 ± 91/670 ± 3260), respectively, P < 0.05. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that SSO membership imparts an additional 22 publications and 270 citations, whereas NCI-designated CCC added 10 additional publications, but not citations. CONCLUSIONS: CCCs have significantly higher academic output and NIH funding. Recruitment of SSO members, a focus on higher performing divisions, and NIH funding are factors that non-NCI cancer centers may be able to focus on to improve academic productivity to aid in obtaining NCI designation.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers/statistics & numerical data , Faculty, Medical/statistics & numerical data , National Cancer Institute (U.S.)/organization & administration , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Surgical Oncology/statistics & numerical data , Academic Medical Centers/organization & administration , Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , Efficiency , National Cancer Institute (U.S.)/statistics & numerical data , Publications/statistics & numerical data , Societies, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Surgical Oncology/organization & administration , United States
18.
Psychol Res ; 83(4): 651-665, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30535833

ABSTRACT

Spontaneous future cognitions refer to mental representations about the future that enter consciousness with no immediately preceding attempt of bringing them to mind. They are studied under different terms in several areas of psychology, but with little interdisciplinary exchange of findings and theoretical developments. Different conceptions of spontaneous future cognition derive from separate literatures and are rarely considered together, leaving their potential conceptual overlaps as well as their unique features unclarified. In this article, I review research on spontaneous future cognitions in relation to mind wandering, involuntary episodic future thoughts, and intrusive future imagery in cravings and clinical disorders. I conclude that more research is needed to clarify the potential functions served by spontaneous future cognitions in everyday life, under which conditions they may become dysfunctional, how they are triggered by situational cues, and how their content may be constrained by motivational factors and beliefs. The burgeoning field of spontaneous future cognitions forms a promising novel approach to the cognitive and motivational regulation of behavior in everyday life.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , Biomedical Research/trends , Cognition/physiology , Fantasy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Forecasting , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Research Design , Surveys and Questionnaires
19.
Sci China Life Sci ; 62(1): 46-62, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30267261

ABSTRACT

The prevalence of diabetes has increased dramatically over the past three decades, and currently, China has the largest number of diabetics worldwide; this number continues to grow and puts ongoing strains on the medical resources. In this review, we reviewed the diabetes research conducted in China from 1995 to 2015 with the aim of providing new insights regarding the current status and future perspectives for researchers, diabetes health providers, and respective policy-makers. Remarkable progress has been made in diabetes research in China during the past two decades in terms of both the quantity and publication influence. The progress, however, struggles to adequately manage diabetes in China. Here we addressed opportunities to strengthen researches, including new drug development, high quality studies on health economics, and healthcare quality improvement studies. As the expected wave of diabetic complications is upcoming and overwhelming, we therefore recommend that immediate improvements are required to implement the researches regarding their prevention and treatment.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/methods , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Medicine, Chinese Traditional/methods , Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , Biomedical Research/trends , China/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/prevention & control , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Humans , Medicine, Chinese Traditional/statistics & numerical data , Medicine, Chinese Traditional/trends , Public Health/economics , Public Health/methods , Publications/statistics & numerical data , Publications/trends , Quality of Health Care/economics , Quality of Health Care/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL