Electroacupuncture attenuates nociceptive behaviors in a mouse model of cancer pain.

Pain is a major symptom in cancer patients, and cancer-induced bone pain (CIBP) is the most common type of moderate and severe cancer-related pain. The current available analgesic treatments for CIBP have adverse effects as well as limited therapeutic effects. Acupuncture is proved effective in pain management as a safe alternative therapy. We evaluated the analgesic effect of acupuncture in treatment of cancer pain and try to explore the underlying analgesic mechanisms. Nude mice were inoculated with cancer cells into the left distal femur to establish cancer pain model. Electroacupuncture (EA) treatment was applied for the xenograft animals. Pain behaviors of mice were evaluated, followed by the detections of neuropeptide-related and inflammation-related indicators in peripheral and central levels. EA treatment alleviated cancer-induced pain behaviors covering mechanical allodynia, thermal hyperalgesia and spontaneous pain, and also down-regulated immunofluorescence expressions of neuropeptide CGRP and p75 in the skin of affected plantar area in xenograft mice, and inhibited expressions of overexpressed neuropeptide-related and inflammation-related protein in the lumbar spinal cord of xenograft mice. Overall, our findings suggest that EA treatment ameliorated cancer-induced pain behaviors in the mouse xenograft model of cancer pain, possibly through inhibiting the expressions of neuropeptide-related and inflammation-related protein in central level following tumor cell xenografts.

Folic acid relieves bone cancer pain by downregulating P2X2/3 receptors in rats.

BACKGROUND: Bone cancer pain (BCP) remains a clinical challenge due to the limited and side effects of therapeutic methods. Folic acid has been known as an FDA approved dietary supplement and proved to have an analgesic effect in neuropathic pain. Here we investigate the role and mechanism of folic acid in bone cancer pain of a rat model. METHODS: Walker 256 tumor cells were inoculated into the left tibia of rats to induce bone cancer pain model. Pain reflex were assessed by paw withdrawal threshold (PWT) response to Von Frey filaments and paw withdrawal latency (PWL) response to thermal stimulation. Folic acid was injected intraperitoneally to evaluate its analgesic effect in rats with bone cancer pain. Western blotting and qPCR were used to determine P2X2/3 receptor protein and mRNA levels in ipsilateral L4-6 dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and spinal dorsal horn (SDH). RESULTS: The PWT and PWL of rats with bone cancer pain were obviously decreased compared to the naïve and sham rats. Interestingly, continuous folic acid treatment significantly increased the PWT and PWL of rats with bone cancer pain. P2X2 and P2X3 receptors were clearly upregulated at both mRNA and protein expression in L4-6 DRG and SDH of rats with bone cancer pain. P2X2 and P2X3 receptors were mainly localized with CGRP (calcitonin gene-related peptide) or IB4 (isolectin B4) positive neurons in L4-6 DRG of rats with bone cancer pain. Notably, continuous folic acid treatment significantly reduced the expression of P2X2 and P2X3 receptors in L4-6 DRG and SDH of rats with bone cancer pain. Finally, intrathecal injection of A317491 (a selective antagonist of P2X2/3 receptors) markedly elevated the PWT and PWL of rats with bone cancer pain. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that folic acid has an effective antinociceptive effect on bone cancer pain, which is mediated by downregulating P2X2/3 receptors in L4-6 DRG and SDH of rats with bone cancer pain. Folic acid may be a novel therapeutic strategy in cancer patients for pain relief.

Analgesic effect of electroacupuncture on bone cancer pain in rat model: the role of peripheral P2X3 receptor.

Upregulation of P2X3 receptor (P2X3R) has been strongly implicated in nociceptive signaling including bone cancer pain (BCP). The present study, using rat bone cancer model, aimed to explore the role of P2X3R in regulating rat pain behavior under the intervention of electroacupuncture (EA). The BCP model was successfully established by injection with MRMT-1 breast cancer cell into the medullary cavity of left tibia for 3 × 104 cells/3 µL PBS in rats as revealed by obvious bone destruction, decreased paw withdrawal thresholds (PWTs), and reduced paw withdrawal latencies (PWLs). Western blot analyses showed that P2X3R expression was significantly upregulated in ipsilateral lumbar 4-6 (L4-6) dorsal root ganglia (DRG), but the difference not seen in spinal cord dorsal horn (SCDH). With the in-depth study of P2X3R activation, we observed that intrathecal injection of P2X3R agonist α,ß-meATP aggravated MRMT-1 induced BCP, while injection of P2X3R inhibitor A-317491 alleviated pain. Subsequently, we demonstrated that BCP induced mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia were attenuated after EA treatment. Under EA treatment, total P2X3R protein expression in ipsilateral DRGs was decreased, and it is worth mentioning that decreased expression of P2X3R membrane protein, which indicated that both the expression and membrane trafficking of P2X3R were inhibited by EA. The immunofluorescence assay showed that EA stimulation exerted functions by reducing the expression of P2X3R-positive cells in ipsilateral DRGs of BCP rats. Ca2+ imaging analysis revealed that the EA stimulation decreased the percentage of α,ß-meATP responsive neurons in DRGs and inhibited calcium influx. Notably, the inhibitory effect of EA on mechanical allodynia and nociceptive flinches was abolished by intrathecal injection of α,ß-meATP. These findings demonstrated EA stimulation ameliorated mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia in rat model of MRMT-1-induced BCP. EA exerts analgesic effect on BCP by reducing the overexpression and functional activity of P2X3R in ipsilateral DRGs of BCP rats. Our work first demonstrates the critical and overall role of P2X3R in EA's analgesia against peripheral sensitization of MRMT-1-induced BCP and further supports EA as a potential therapeutic option for cancer pain in clinic.

TRP Channels as Molecular Targets to Relieve Cancer Pain.

Transient receptor potential (TRP) channels are critical receptors in the transduction of nociceptive stimuli. The microenvironment of diverse types of cancer releases substances, including growth factors, neurotransmitters, and inflammatory mediators, which modulate the activity of TRPs through the regulation of intracellular signaling pathways. The modulation of TRP channels is associated with the peripheral sensitization observed in patients with cancer, which results in mild noxious sensory stimuli being perceived as hyperalgesia and allodynia. Secondary metabolites derived from plant extracts can induce the activation, blocking, and desensitization of TRP channels. Thus, these compounds could act as potential therapeutic agents, as their antinociceptive properties could be beneficial in relieving cancer-derived pain. In this review, we will summarize the role of TRPV1 and TRPA1 in pain associated with cancer and discuss molecules that have been reported to modulate these channels, focusing particularly on the mechanisms of channel activation associated with molecules released in the tumor microenvironment.

Antinociceptive activity of Schinus terebinthifolia leaf lectin (SteLL) in sarcoma 180-bearing mice.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY RELEVANCE: Schinus terebinthifolia Raddi leaves have been used in folk medicine due to several properties, including antitumor and analgesic effects. The variable efficacy and adverse effects of analgesic drugs have motivated the search for novel antinociceptive agents. It has been reported that the S. terebinthifolia leaf lectin (SteLL) has antitumor activity against sarcoma 180 in mice. AIM OF THE STUDY: This work aimed to evaluate whether SteLL would reduce cancer pain using an orthotopic tumor model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sarcoma 180 cell suspension was inoculated into the right hind paws of mice, and the treatments (150 mM NaCl, negative control; 10 mg/kg morphine, positive control; or SteLL at 1 and 2 mg/kg) were administered intraperitoneally 24 h after cell inoculation up to 14 days. Spontaneous nociception, mechanical hyperalgesia, and hot-plate tests were performed. Further, the volume and weight of the tumor-bearing paws were measured. RESULTS: SteLL (2 mg/kg) improved limb use during ambulation. The lectin (1 and 2 mg/kg) also inhibited mechanical hyperalgesia and increased the latency time during the hot-plate test. Naloxone was found to reverse this effect, indicating the involvement of opioid receptors. The tumor-bearing paws of mice treated with SteLL exhibited lower volume and weight. CONCLUSION: SteLL reduced hyperalgesia due to sarcoma 180 in the paws of mice, and this effect can be related to its antitumor action.

Investigation of the Involvement of the Endocannabinoid System in TENS-Induced Antinociception.

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) promotes antinociception by activating the descending pain modulation pathway and consequently releasing endogenous analgesic substances. In addition, recent studies have shown that the endocannabinoid system controls pain. Thus, the present study investigated the involvement of the endocannabinoid system in TENS-induced antinociception of cancer pain using a cancer pain model induced by intraplantar (i.pl.) injections of Ehrlich tumor cells in male Swiss mice. Low- and high-frequency TENS was applied for 20 minutes to the mice's paws, and to investigate the involvement of the endocannabinoid system were used the N-(peperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-iodophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pitazole-3-carboixamide (AM251), a cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist and (5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z)-5,8,11,14-eicosatetraenyl-methylester phosphonofluoridic acid (MAFP), an inhibitor of the endocannabinoid metabolizing enzyme fatty acid amide hydrolase, injected by via i.pl., intrathecal (i.t.), and intradorsolateral periaqueductal gray matter (i.dl.PAG). Furthermore, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, western blot, and immunofluorescence assays were used to evaluate the endocannabinoid anandamide levels, cannabinoid CB1 receptor protein levels, and cannabinoid CB1 receptor immunoreactivity, respectively. Low- and high-frequency TENS reduced the mechanical allodynia induced by Ehrlich tumor cells and this effect was reversed by AM251 and potentiated by MAFP at the peripheral and central levels. In addition, TENS increased the endocannabinoid anandamide levels and the cannabinoid CB1 receptor protein levels and immunoreactivity in the paw, spinal cord, and dorsolateral periaqueductal gray matter. These results suggest that low- and high-frequency TENS is effective in controlling cancer pain, and the endocannabinoid system is involved in this effect at both the peripheral and central levels. PERSPECTIVE: TENS is a nonpharmacological strategy that may be used to control cancer pain. Identification of a new mechanism involved in its analgesic effect could lead to the development of clinical studies as well as an increase in its application, lessening the need for pharmacological treatments.

p-Cymene attenuates cancer pain via inhibitory pathways and modulation of calcium currents.

BACKGROUND: Oncological pain is one of the most prevalent and difficult-to-treat symptoms in patients with cancer. p-Cymene (PC) is a monoterpene found in more than 100 different plant species, endowed with various pharmacological properties-particularly antinociceptive. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: PC has antinociceptive effect in a model of oncologic pain due to the activation of the descending inhibitory pathway of pain. STUDY DESIGN: A pre-clinical, longitudinal, blind and randomized study. METHODS: Male Swiss mice were induced with S180 cells in the right hind paw, then treated daily with PC (12.5, 25 and 50 mg/kg, s.c.) and screened for mechanical hyperalgesia, spontaneous nociception, nociception induced by non-noxious palpation, tumor growth, changes in the neuromuscular function and existence of bone degradation in the tumor area. The effect of PC on Ca2+ currents (electrophysiological records), histological and neurochemical changes (immunofluorescence for Fos) were also evaluated. RESULTS: PC reduced (p < 0.05) the mechanical hyperalgesia, the spontaneous (p < 0.001) and non-noxious palpation (p < 0.001) nociceptions, not changing the tumor development, neuromuscular function or histopathological aspects of the paw affected. PC reduced Fos expression in the spinal cord (p < 0.001) and increased this expression in the PAG (p < 0.05) and in the NRM (p < 0.01). PC decreased the density of calcium channel currents (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These results suggest the antinociceptive effect of PC on oncologic pain, probably acting in both ascending and descending pain pathways, and modulating the calcium channel currents in order to exert its effects.

Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation for the Management of Depression, Anxiety, Sleep Disturbance, and Pain in Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Preliminary Study.

CONTEXT: Cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) is a safe modulation of brain activity for treating depression, anxiety, insomnia, and pain. However, there are no published studies in patients with advanced cancer (ACPs). OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to determine the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a four-week CES intervention on depression, anxiety, sleep disturbance, and pain scores. Concurrent salivary biomarker studies were conducted. METHODS: In this one group open label pre- and post-intervention study with a four-week CES intervention, ACPs with one or more of four moderate intensity (≥3/10) Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) symptoms (depression, anxiety, sleep disturbance, and pain) were eligible. Adherence (0%-100%), satisfaction rates (0-10), and safety were assessed. ESAS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Brief Pain Inventory, and salivary levels (cortisol, alpha amylase, C-reactive protein, and interleukin-1ß, and interleukin-6) were assessed from baseline to Week 4. RESULTS: Thirty-three of 36 patients (92%) completed the CES. Median (interquartile range) adherence CES use and satisfaction scores were 93% (89-100) and 10% (9-10), respectively, and the adherence criteria was met in the study. CES use was safe (no Grade 3 or higher adverse events). HADS anxiety (P < 0.001), HADS depression (P = 0.024), ESAS anxiety (P = 0.001), ESAS depression (P = 0.025), Brief Pain Inventory pain (P = 0.013), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index daytime dysfunction (P = 0.002), and medication use (P = 0.006) scores improved after four-week CES treatment. CONCLUSION: In this preliminary study, we found that the use of CES was safe and feasible in ACP. The use of CES was associated with significant improvement of depression, anxiety, pain, and sleep scores. These findings support further studies of CES in ACP for symptom control.

[Effects of electroacupuncture on expression of µ-opioid receptor in nucleus ceruleus in rats with bone cancer pain-morphine tolerance].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the effects of electroacupuncture (EA) on pain behavior in rats with bone cancer pain and morphine tolerance, and to explore partial action mechanism. METHODS: Forty-two SD healthy female rats were randomly divided into a sham operation group (7 rats), a bone cancer pain group (8 rats), a morphine tolerance group (9 rats), an EA group (9 rats) and a sham EA group (9 rats). The rats in the sham operation group were treated with injection of phosphate buffer saline at medullary cavity of left-side tibia, and the rats in the remaining groups were injected with MRMT-1 breast cancer cells. After operation, no treatment was given to rats in the sham operation group and bone cancer pain group. 11 days after operation, rats in the morphine tole-rance group, EA group and sham EA group were treated with intraperitoneal injection of morphine hydrochloride, once every 12 hours, for 11 days to establish the model of bone cancer pain and morphine tolerance. One day after the establishment of this bone cancer pain model, the rats in the morphine tolerance group were injected with morphine, once every 12 hours (9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m.) for 7 days; the rats in the EA group and sham EA group were injected with morphine at 9:00 a.m., and treated with EA (2 Hz/100 Hz) and sham EA (only injected into the subcutaneous tissue) at bilateral "Zusanli" (ST 36) and "Kunlun" (BL 60), 30 min per treatment, once a day for 7 days. One day before cancer cell injection, 6 days, 8 days, 10 days after operation, after 30 min on 1 days, 5 days, 9 days, 11 days of morphine injection, and after 30 min on 1 days, 3 days, 5 days, 7 days of EA treatment, the paw withdrawal threshold (PWT) was measured in each group. On 11 day of morphine injection, HE staining was applied to observe the morphology and structure change of tibia in the sham operation group, bone cancer pain group and morphine tolerance group, random 2 rats in each group. On 7 days of EA treatment, fluorescent immunohistochemical method was applied to observe the expression of µ-opioid receptor positive cells in nucleus ceruleus in each group, random 4 rats in each one. RESULTS: After 10 days of the cancer cells injection, the PWT of 28 rats of bone cancer pain model (8 rats in the bone cancer pain group, 8 rats in the morphine tolerance group, 6 rats in the EA group and 6 rats in the sham EA group) was significantly lower than that of 7 rats in the sham operation group (P<0.01). After one day of morphine injection, the PWT of the morphine tolerance group, EA group and sham EA group was higher than that of the bone cancer pain group (all P<0.01); on 11 d of morphine injection, the PWT of the morphine tolerance group, EA group and sham EA group was not significantly different from that of the bone cancer pain group (all P>0.05). On 11 d of morphine injection, the tumor induced by cancer cells was observed in upper 1/3 tibia in the bone cancer pain group and morphine tolerance group, and the marrow cavity was filled with MRMT-1 cancer cells; no abnormal change was observed in the sham operation group. On 1 d, 3 d, 5 d and 7 d of EA treatment, the PWT of the cancer pain group, morphine tolerance group and sham EA group was lower than that of the EA group (all P<0.01). On 7 d of EA treatment, the positive expression of MOR in nucleus ceruleus in the cancer pain group, morphine tolerance group, EA group and sham EA group was lower than that in the sham operation group (P<0.01, P<0.05), and that in the cancer pain group, morphine tolerance group and sham EA group was lower than that in the EA group (all P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: EA can improve mechanical pain threshold in rats with bone cancer pain-morphine tolerance, and improve the abnormal pain, which is likely to be involved with improvement of the MOR positive cells expression in nucleus ceruleus by EA.