Intraoperative electroencephalographic changes during transcarotid artery revascularization are more frequent than previously reported.

OBJECTIVE: Up to 14% of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy with continuous electroencephalographic (EEG) neuromonitoring will require shunt placement because of EEG changes. However, the initial studies of transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) found only one patient with temporary EEG changes. We report our experience with intraoperative EEG monitoring during TCAR. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent TCAR at two urban hospitals within an integrated healthcare network from May 2017 to January 2020. The data included demographic information, patient comorbidities, symptom status, previous carotid interventions, anatomic details, contralateral disease, intraoperative vital signs and EEG changes, and postoperative major adverse events (transient ischemic attack, stroke, myocardial infarction [MI], and death) both initially and at 30 days postoperatively. The Fisher exact test was used for categorical data and the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous data. RESULTS: A total of 89 patients underwent TCAR during the study period, of whom 71 (79.8%) received intraoperative EEG neuromonitoring. Of the 89 patients, 70.8% were men and 29.2% were women. The median age was 75 years (IQR, 68-82.5 years). Symptomatic patients accounted for 41.6% of the cohort. Of the 71 patients who received continuous neuromonitoring, 9 experienced EEG changes during TCAR (12.7%). The changes resolved in seven patients with pressure augmentation in three and switching to a low flow toggle in three. One patient who had sustained EEG changes had a new postoperative neurologic deficit. The median carotid stenosis percentage on preoperative computed tomography angiography was lower for patients with EEG changes than for those without (67% vs 80%; P = .01). No correlation was found between symptom status or 30-day stroke in patients with and without EEG changes (P = .49 and P = .24, respectively). Overall, three postoperative strokes, two postoperative deaths, and one MI occurred, for a composite 30-day stroke, death, and MI rate of 6.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in continuous EEG monitoring were more frequent in our study than previously reported. Less severe carotid stenosis might be associated with a greater incidence of EEG changes. Limited data are available on the prognostic ability of EEG to detect clinically relevant changes during TCAR, and further studies are warranted.

Anesthetic choice during transcarotid artery revascularization and carotid endarterectomy affects the risk of myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown no differences in the outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) performed with general anesthesia (GA) vs local or regional anesthesia (LRA). To date, no study has specifically compared the outcomes of TCAR to those of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) stratified by anesthetic type. The aim of the present study was to identify the effect of the anesthetic type on the outcomes of TCAR vs CEA. METHODS: Patients undergoing CEA and TCAR for carotid artery stenosis from 2016 to 2019 in the Vascular Quality Initiative were included. We excluded patients who had undergone concomitant procedures, patients with more than two stented lesions, and patients who had undergone the procedure for a nonatherosclerotic indication. Propensity score matching was performed between the two procedures stratified by the anesthetic type for age, sex, race, presenting symptoms, major comorbidities (ie, hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease), previous coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention, previous CEA or carotid artery stenting, degree of ipsilateral stenosis, the presence of contralateral occlusion, and preoperative medications. Intergroup differences between the treatment groups and differences in the perioperative outcomes were tested using the McNemar test for categorical variables and the paired t test or Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test for continuous variables, as appropriate. The relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated as the ratio of the probability of the outcome event for the patients treated within each treatment group. RESULTS: A total of 65,337 patients were included. Of the 65,337 patients, 59,664 had undergone carotid revascularization under GA (91%). When performed with LRA, TCAR and CEA had similar rates of stroke, death, and MI. However, when performed with GA, patients undergoing TCAR had a 50% decreased risk of MI compared with those undergoing CEA under GA (0.5% vs 1.0%; RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.32-0.80; P < .01). When stratified by symptomatic status, patients undergoing TCAR with GA for symptomatic carotid disease had a 67% decreased risk of MI compared with those undergoing CEA with GA for symptomatic disease (0.4% vs 1.2%; RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.15-0.75; P < .01). In contrast, no difference was found in the risk of MI between patients undergoing CEA vs TCAR for asymptomatic carotid disease (0.6% vs 0.9%; RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.37-1.14; P = .13). CONCLUSIONS: The results from the present study have confirmed previous studies suggesting that TCAR confers a lower risk of MI compared with CEA. However, our findings demonstrated no differences in the MI rates between TCAR and CEA when performed with LRA. Patients undergoing TCAR under GA had lower rates of MI compared with patients undergoing CEA under GA. When stratified by symptomatic status, the benefit of TCAR persisted only for the symptomatic patients.

Long-term stroke risk with carotid endarterectomy in patients with severe carotid stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: Informed debate regarding the optimal use of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for stroke risk reduction requires contemporary assessment of both long-term risk and periprocedural risk. In this study, we report long-term stroke and death risk after CEA in a large integrated health care system. METHODS: All patients with documented severe (70%-99%) stenosis from 2008 to 2012 who underwent CEA were identified and stratified by asymptomatic or symptomatic indication. Those with prior ipsilateral interventions were excluded. Patients were followed up through 2017 for the primary outcomes of any stroke/death within 30 days of intervention and long-term ipsilateral ischemic stroke; secondary outcomes were any stroke and overall survival. RESULTS: Overall, 1949 patients (63.2% male; mean age, 71.3 ± 8.9 years) underwent 2078 primary CEAs, 1196 (58%) for asymptomatic stenosis and 882 (42%) for symptomatic stenosis. Mean follow-up was 5.5 ± 2.7 years. Median time to surgery was 72.0 (interquartile range, 38.5-198.0) days for asymptomatic patients and 21.0 (interquartile range, 5.0-55.0) days for symptomatic patients (P < .001). Most of the patients' demographics and characteristics were similar in both groups. Controlled blood pressure rates were similar at the time of CEA. Baseline statin use was seen in 60.5% of the asymptomatic group compared with 39.9% in the symptomatic group (P < .001), and statin adherence by 80% medication possession ratio was 19.3% asymptomatic vs 12.4% symptomatic (P < .001). The crude overall 30-day any stroke/death rates were 0.9% and 1.5% for the asymptomatic group and the symptomatic group, respectively. The 5-year risk of ipsilateral stroke and a combined end point of any stroke/death by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were 2.5% and 28.7% for the asymptomatic group and 4.0% and 31.4% for the symptomatic group, respectively. Unadjusted cumulative all-cause survival was 74.2% for the asymptomatic group and 71.8% for the symptomatic group at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: In a contemporary review of CEA, outcomes for either operative indication show low adverse events perioperatively and low long-term stroke risk up to 5 years. These results are well within consensus guidelines and published trial outcomes and should help inform the discussion around optimal CEA use for severe carotid stenosis.

The study of transcarotid artery revascularization under local versus general anesthesia with results from the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative.

OBJECTIVE: The primary purpose of this study was to examine any potential difference in clinical outcomes between transcarotid artery revascularization performed under local anesthesia compared with general anesthesia by utilizing a large national database. METHODS: The primary outcome of the study was a composite endpoint of postoperative in-hospital stroke, myocardial infarction and mortality following transcarotid artery revascularization for the index procedure. Secondary outcomes included a composite outcome of postoperative in-hospital stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction and mortality along with several subsets of its components and each individual component, flow reversal time (min), radiation dose (GY/cm2), contrast volume utilized (mL), total procedure time (min), extended total length of stay (>1 day) and extended postoperative length of stay (>1 day). Statistical analyses employed both descriptive measures to characterize the study population and analytic measures such as multivariable mixed-effect linear and logistic regressions using both unmatched and propensity-score matched cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 2609 patients undergoing transcarotid artery revascularization between the years 2016 and 2018 in the US were identified, with 82.3% performed under general anesthesia and 17.7% under local anesthesia. The primary composite outcome was observed in 2.3% of general anesthesia patients versus 2.6% of local anesthesia patients (p = 0.808). The rate of postoperative transient ischemic attack and/or myocardial infarction was 1.6% with general anesthesia versus 1.1% with local anesthesia (p = 0.511). For adjusted regression analysis, general anesthesia and local anesthesia were comparable in terms of primary outcome (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.27-1.93, p = 0.515). As for the secondary outcomes, no significant differences were found except for contrast, where the results demonstrated significantly less need for contrast with procedures performed under general anesthesia (coefficient: 4.94; 95% CI: 1.34-8.54, p = 0.007). A trend towards significance was observed for lower rate of postoperative transient ischemic attack and/or myocardial infarction (OR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.09-1.18, p = 0.088) and lower flow reversal time under local anesthesia (coefficient: -0.94: 95% CI: -2.1-0.22, p = 0.111). CONCLUSIONS: Excellent outcomes from transcarotid artery revascularization for carotid stenosis were observed in the VQI database between the years 2016 and 2018, under both local anesthesia and general anesthesia. The data demonstrate the choice of anesthesia for transcarotid artery revascularization does not appear to have any effect on clinical outcomes. Surgical teams should perform transcarotid artery revascularization under the anesthesia type they are most comfortable with.

Examination of the interaction between method of anesthesia and shunting with carotid endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Although the choice of anesthesia during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) does not seem to increase the risk of perioperative stroke, it might affect the outcomes of shunting during CEA. This study aims to evaluate whether the choice of anesthesia modifies the association between shunting and in-hospital stroke/death after CEA. METHODS: We retrospective reviewed all CEA cases performed between 2003 and 2017 in the Vascular Quality Initiative. Patients were divided into three groups: (1) no shunting during CEA (n = 29,227 [48.4%]), (2) routine shunting (n = 28,673 [47.5%]), and (3) selective shunting based on an intraoperative indication (n = 2499 [4.1%]). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to study the interaction between anesthesia (local anesthesia [LA]/regional anesthesia [RA] vs general anesthesia [GA]) and intraoperative shunting (no shunting vs routine and selective shunting) during CEA in predicting the risk of in-hospital stroke/death after CEA. RESULTS: The final cohort included 60,399 patients. The majority of CEA cases (90.2%) were performed under GA. Of the study cohort, 29,227 (48.4%) underwent CEA without shunting, 28,673 patients (47.5%) had routine shunting, and the remaining (n = 2499 [4.1%]) were selectively shunted. The interaction between intraoperative shunting and anesthesia in predicting in-hospital stroke/death was statistically significant (P < .05). When CEA is performed under LA/GA, routine shunting was associated with 3.5 times the adjusted odds of in-hospital stroke/death after CEA (odds ratio [OR], 3.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-6.8; P < .001) compared with no shunting, whereas selective shunting was associated with 7.1 the odds (OR, 7.1; 95% CI, 3.5-14.7; P < .001). In contrast, under GA, there was no significant association between routine shunting and in-hospital stroke/death (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.5; P = .12), whereas selective shunting was associated with 1.7 times the odds (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.4; P < .01) compared with not performing shunting during CEA. CONCLUSIONS: The use of LA/RA is associated with increased odds of stroke/death compared with GA when intraoperative shunting is performed. The effect of anesthesia is more pronounced in patients who develop clamp-related ischemia and undergo selective shunting. More controlled studies are needed to explain these findings and validate them.

Outcome of carotid artery stenting in the hands of vascular surgeons.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the procedural and clinical outcomes of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in the hands of endovascular trained vascular surgeons. METHODS: Between April 2008 to May 2013, 1197 patients were treated for extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. The proportion of endovascular treated patients was 5.0% (CAS n = 60 vs. carotid endarterectomy (CEA) n = 1137). All patients in the CAS group (44 males, median age 70 years) were treated by two senior vascular surgeons experienced in endovascular methods. Restenosis was the indication for CAS in 32 out of 60 patients (53.3%). Further indications were contralateral ICA occlusion (n = 14, 23.3%), radiogenic ICA stenosis (n = 5, 8.3%), high-risk candidates for CEA (n = 4, 6.6%), and the presence of contralateral recurrent paresis (n = 2, 3.3%). High-risk patients for CEA were defined as patients with history of severe cardiac disease and patients with impaired general condition. 84.4% (n = 27) of the restenosis were asymptomatic with a mean degree of stenosis of 83.7%, and 12.9% (n = 4) were symptomatic (degree of stenosis of 90%). Mean procedural and fluoroscopy time were 61 and 14 min. Study endpoints were periprocedural stroke-related mortality and morbidity, restenosis rate, and overall survival. Follow-up was performed by duplex ultrasound with a median follow-up period of 12 months (range 1-55). RESULTS: The periprocedural stroke rate of CAS within 30 days was 3.3% (one ischemic stroke, one intracranial hemorrhage); two additional patients suffered TIA (3.3%). None of the patients had a myocardial infarction perioperatively. The mortality rate was 0. CAS procedures were completed in 90.0% (n = 54) of cases. Dropout rate was 8.3% (n = 5) for morphological reasons (e.g., carotid kinking). Intraoperative complication rate was 1.7% (n = 1) including one patient who suffered intraoperative rupture of access vessels. The conversion rate with subsequent CEA procedure was 6.6% (n = 4 of 5). The restenosis rate during follow-up was 3.3% after CAS. The reintervention rate during the median follow-up period of 12 months (1-55 months) was 5.5% (n = 3/54). Two patients received a reintervention with successful balloon angioplasty; in one case, a diagnostic angiography was performed excluding the presence of a relevant restenosis. No additional stent was implanted. The survival rate was 100% at 1 year, 90.4% at 2 years, and 77.7% at 3 years. CONCLUSION: CAS, in the hands of vascular surgeons, is feasible with a moderate perioperative risk in a highly selected patient cohort. A procedure termination rate of approximately 10% shows that the complementary therapy using CAS procedure is not overused by surgeons.

The Carnitine-butyrobetaine-trimethylamine-N-oxide pathway and its association with cardiovascular mortality in patients with carotid atherosclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: γ-butyrobetaine (γBB) is a metabolite from dietary Carnitine, involved in the gut microbiota-dependent conversion from Carnitine to the pro-atherogenic metabolite trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO). Orally ingested γBB has a pro-atherogenic effect in experimental studies, but γBB has not been studied in relation to atherosclerosis in humans. The aim of this study was to evaluate associations between serum levels of γBB, TMAO and their common precursors Carnitine and trimethyllysine (TML) and carotid atherosclerosis and adverse outcome. METHODS: Serum γBB, Carnitine, TML and TMAO were quantified by high performance liquid chromatography in patients with carotid artery atherosclerosis (n = 264) and healthy controls (n = 62). RESULTS: Serum γBB (p = 0.024) and Carnitine (p = 0.001), but not TMAO or TML, were increased in patients with carotid atherosclerosis. Higher levels of γBB and TML, but not TMAO or Carnitine were independently associated with cardiovascular death also after adjustment for age and eGFR (adjusted HR [95%] 3.3 [1.9-9.1], p = 0.047 and 6.0 [1.8-20.34], p = 0.026, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with carotid atherosclerosis had increased serum levels of γBB, and elevated levels of γBB and its precursor TML were associated with cardiovascular mortality. Long-term clinical studies of γBB, as a cardiovascular risk marker, and safety studies regarding dietary supplementation of γBB, are warranted.

Eversion carotid endarterectomy--our experience after 20 years of carotid surgery and 9897 carotid endarterectomy procedures.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this article is to review our experience in surgical treatment of carotid atherosclerosis using eversion carotid endarterectomy (eCEA) in 9,897 patients performed in the last 20 years, with particular attention to diagnostic approach, surgical technique, medical therapy, and final outcome. METHODS: From January 1991 to December 2010, 9,897 primary eCEAs were performed for high-grade carotid stenosis. Patients treated for restenosis after previous carotid surgery were excluded from the analysis. Follow-up included routine clinical evaluation and noninvasive surveillance, with duplex scanning, 1 and 6 months after surgery, and annually afterward. RESULTS: The majority of the patients were symptomatic (stroke, 42.8%; transient ischemic attack, 55.1% [focal cerebral and retinal ischemia]), whereas only 2.1% of the patients were asymptomatic. For the final diagnosis, duplex scanning was performed in 83.4% of patients and angiography in only 16.3% (P < 0.001). Average carotid artery clamping time was 11.9 ± 3.2 minutes, and the majority of the patients were operated under general anesthesia (99.4%). Intraoperative shunting and local anesthesia were rarely performed; 0.6% of the patients were operated under local anesthesia, and in 0.5% of the patients, intraluminal shunt was used. Neurological and total morbidity showed a steady decline over time, with rate of neurological morbidity of 1.1% and total morbidity of 3.9% at the end of 2010. Neurological mortality and total mortality also showed a steady decline over time, with rate of neurological mortality of 0.3% and total mortality of 0.8% at the end of 2010. There was a low rate of both, nonsignificant restenosis (<50%), which was verified in 2.1% of the patients, and significant restenosis (>50%), which was observed in 4.3% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Our data show that eCEA is a reliable surgical technique for the treatment of atherosclerotic carotid disease, with low morbidity and mortality. The specificity of our experience is the significant number of patients with preoperative stroke, but despite this fact, results are comparable with previously published series. It also highlights the importance of comprehensive surgical training in reducing complications.

Comparison between local and general anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: early and late results.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the results between general and local anesthesia (LA) for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). METHODS: Three hundred and twenty-nine patients in whom 365 CEA procedures were performed between January 1990 and September 2001, were included in this study. RESULTS: Operation time, shunt usage rates, hospitalization time (P < .0001), and permanent stroke rates (P < .05) were significantly lower in group with LA. For long-term period (121.3 ± 37.45 vs 98.6 ± 28.98 months), no significant difference was observed in these 2 group with respect to restenosis rates, neurological events, and deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lack of significant difference between LA and general anesthesia in terms of restenosis, neurological events, and death in the long-term period; LA is more preferable due its associated advantages including availability of testing the consciousness of the patients by direct contact, reduced use of shunts, shorter hospitalization periods, and less prevalence of permanent stroke in the short-term period.

Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis under local anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: In this article, we present our experience with such operations performed under local anaesthesia. METHODS: From January 1997 to November 2007, there were 387 patients operated on for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Patient data were retrospectively evaluated. Thirty-day neurological morbidity and mortality from six different subgroups were analysed and compared. The numbers of perioperative transient ischaemic attacks, as well as surgical and other perioperative complications were also evaluated. RESULTS: Overall morbidity and mortality was 1.8% (seven patients). Stroke was noted in 1.3% (five patients). Transitory ischaemic attacks within the first 30 days were observed in 1.6% (six patients). Only those patients who had intraluminal shunt insertion were found to have significantly higher morbidity and mortality. (p = 0.000018). Myocardial infarction was observed in 0.5% (two patients), one fatal. CONCLUSION: We have achieved acceptable morbidity and mortality rates (1.8%) according to the parameters set by previous studies such as Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study and Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Trial as well as American Heart Association and European Stroke Organisation guidelines. All surgeries were done under local anaesthesia. Shunts were inserted in 22 cases (5.68%).

Eight-year institutional review of carotid artery stenting.

OBJECTIVES: Vascular surgeons have increasingly become proficient in carotid artery stenting (CAS) as an alternative treatment modality for cervical carotid artery occlusive disease. We analyzed our early and late outcomes of CAS over the last 8 years. METHODS: We report a single-center retrospective review of 388 carotid bifurcation lesions treated with CAS using cerebral embolic protection from May 2001 to July 2009. Data analysis includes demographics, procedural records, duplex exams, arteriograms, and two-view plain radiographs over a mean follow-up time of 23.0 months (interquartile range, 10.9-35.4). RESULTS: At the time of treatment, the mean age of the entire cohort (76% men and 24% women) is 71 years; 13% were >/=80 years of age, and 31% had a prior history of either carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and/or external beam neck irradiation (XRT). The mean carotid stenosis is 80%, and asymptomatic lesions represent 69% of the group. Overall 30-day rates of death, stroke, and myocardial infarction are 0.5%, 1.8%, and 0.8%, respectively. The combined death/stroke rate at 30 days is 2.3%. The 30-day major/minor stroke rates for analyzed subgroups are statistically significant only for XRT/recurrent stenosis vs de novo lesions, 0% and 2.6% (P = .03), but not for asymptomatic vs symptomatic patients, 1.9% and 1.7% (P = .91) and age <80 vs >/=80, 2.0% and 1.8% (P = .52), respectively. At long-term, the freedom from all strokes at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months was 99.2%, 97.6%, 96.7%, and 96.7%, respectively. At late follow-up, the restenosis rate is 3.5%. Restenosis rates for recurrent stenosis/XRT vs de novo lesions are 2.7% and 3.4% (P = .39). Among the restenotic lesions were two associated type III stent fractures in de novo lesions, both of which were closed-cell stents. An additional two other type I fractures have been identified, yielding a stent fracture rate of 5.5%. The late death rate for the entire group is 16.8%, with one stent-related death secondary to ipsilateral stroke at 20 months (0.3% death rate). CONCLUSIONS: Vascular surgeons performing CAS with embolic protection can achieve good early and late outcomes that are comparable to CEA benchmarks. Late stent failures (stroke, restenosis, and/or stent fatigue), while uncommon, are a recognized delayed problem.

Outcome of carotid endarterectomy under local anaesthesia with respect to the patients' risk profile.

BACKGROUND: In the present study the perioperative complication rate is compared between high- and low-risk patients when carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is routinely performed under local anaesthesia (LA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2000 through June 2008 1220 consecutive patients underwent CEA under LA. High-risk patients fulfilled at least one of the following characteristics: ASA 4 classification, "hostile neck", recurrent ICA stenosis, contralateral ICA occlusion, age > or = 80 years. The combined complication rate comprised any new neurological deficit (TIA or stroke), myocardial infarction or death within 30 days after CEA, which was compared between patient groups. RESULTS: Overall 309 patients (25%) were attributed to the high-risk group, which differed significantly regarding sex distribution (more males: 70% vs. 63%, p = 0.011), neurological presentation (more asymptomatic: 72% vs. 62%, p = 0.001) and shunt necessity (33% vs. 14%, p < 0.001). In 32 patients 17 TIAs and 15 strokes were observed. In 3 patients a myocardial infarction occurred. Death occurred in one patient following a stroke and in another patient following myocardial infarction, leading to a combined complication rate of 2.9% (35/1220). In the multivariate analysis only previous neurological symptomatology (OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.38-5.91) and intraoperative shunting (OR 5.57, 95% CI 2.69-11.55) were identified as independent risk factors for an increased combined complication rate. CONCLUSIONS: With the routine use of LA, CEA was not associated with worse outcome in high-risk patients. Considering the data reported in the literature, it does not appear justified to refer high-risk patients principally to carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) when LA can be chosen to perform CEA.

Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy--improving the gold standard ?

OBJECTIVE: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) reduces stroke risk among selected patients. To achieve this, low operative risk is crucial. Outcome may depend on whether local (LA) or general (GA) anaesthesia is used. The aim of our study was to assess the risks of CEA under LA compared with that under GA. Primary endpoint was neurological outcome. DESIGN: Retrospective study, prospective data bank. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Analysis was performed of hospital charts from 1341 consecutive patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy between January 1995 and December 2004. The patients were divided into two groups according to intraoperative anaesthesia (LA 465 patients or GA 876 patients). RESULTS: Cerebral complications (transient ischemic attacks and stroke combined) were more common in the GA group (6.9% vs. 3.4%, p<0.009, relative risk 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.272-0.839). Mortality was 0.5% (LA) vs. 0.8% (GA). Combined death and stroke rate were not different between groups (4.1% vs. 3.2%). Postoperative hypertension episodes were more common in the LA group (47.7%, vs. GA 20.4%, p <0.001). Haematomas requiring surgery were more common in the GA group (6.4% vs. 3.0%, p<0.02). CONCLUSION: CEA can be performed safely under LA. It may improve the results and lead to better neurological outcome as compared to GA. Risk factor analysis did not reveal specific risk groups.

Population-based study of determinants of initial secondary care costs of acute stroke in the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of specific interventions to prevent or treat acute stroke, it is necessary to know the costs of stroke according to patient characteristics and stroke subtype and etiology. However, very few such data are available and none from population-based studies. We determined the predictors of resource use and acute care costs of stroke using data from a population-based study. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Oxford Vascular study, a population-based cohort of all individuals in nine general practices in Oxfordshire, UK, which identified 346 patients with a first or recurrent stroke during April 1, 2002, to March 31, 2004. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the main predictors of resource use and costs. RESULTS: Acute care costs ranged from 326 pounds sterling (lower decile) to 19,901 pounds sterling (upper decile). There were multiple important univariate interrelations of patient characteristics, stroke subtype, and stroke etiology with hospital admission, length of stay, and 30-day case-fatality. For example, patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage were more likely to be admitted than patients with partial anterior circulation ischemic stroke and less likely to survive without disability, but length of stay was reduced as a result of high early case-fatality such that cost was substantially less. However, the majority of univariate predictors of resource use, cost, and outcome were confounded by initial stroke severity as measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, which accounted for approximately half of the predicted variance in cost. Cost increased approximately linearly up to an National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 18 and then fell steeply at higher scores as a result of rising early case-fatality. CONCLUSIONS: Several patient and event-related characteristics explained the wide range of initial secondary care costs of acute stroke, but stroke severity was by far the most important independent predictor.

Perioperative morbidity and mortality of carotid artery surgery under loco-regional anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Loco-regional anaesthesia for carotid artery surgery has many advantages over general anaesthesia. It may be associated with a reduction in neurological, and equally important, non-neurological morbidity and mortality. However, sufficiently powered randomised controlled trials comparing general anaesthesia with local anaesthesia for carotid artery surgery are not yet published. Herein, we present our single centre experience of carotid endarterectomy under local anaesthesia and their respective procedure-related morbidity and mortality rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1996 to December 2002, 1271 patients were operated on their carotid arteries. Of these, 1210 (95%) patients and 1355 carotid arteries were operated on in loco-regional anaesthesia and included in a prospective recording. The patients age ranged from 47 to 100 years (mean 70.5 years), 711 patients were male, 499 female. 496 patients (41%) were asymptomatic (Fontaine stage I), 460 have had a transient neurological deficit (TIA) prior to admission (Fontaine stage II) and 254 patients have had a stroke (Fontaine stage IV). RESULTS: The combined stroke rate was 2.2% (n = 30). The overall 30 day mortality was 0.2% (n = 3). The rate of haematoma indicating revision was 3% (n = 40). The revision in all cases was within 12 hours of surgery. No patient developed respiratory insufficiency after surgery. However, of the 40 patients with revision for haematoma, 4 (10%) needed prolonged respiratory assistance and one patient ultimately died of respiratory insufficiency and stroke. No cardiac mortality was observed. The over all rate of myocardial infarction observed postoperatively was 1.4% (n = 19), of which 1.1% (n = 15) were non q-wave infarcts. The combined shunting-rate for all stages was 18.6% (n = 252). CONCLUSION: Morbidity and mortality of carotid endarterectomy in loco-regional anaesthesia is comparable to recently published single-centre results. Patients with severe COPD, usually unsuitable candidates for general anaesthesia, can also be treated safely.

The impact of anesthetic modality on the outcome of carotid endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) reduces the risk of stroke in patients with high-grade carotid artery stenosis. This study evaluates the clinical outcome of CEA performed under local anesthesia (LA) versus general anesthesia (GA). METHODS: Clinical variables and treatment outcomes were analyzed in 548 CEAs performed under either LA or GA during a 30-month period. Factors associated with morbidity were also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 263 CEAs under LA and 285 CEA under GA were analyzed. The LA group was associated with a lower incidence of shunt placement, operative time, and perioperative hemodynamic instability compared to the GA group. No differences in neurologic complications or mortality were found between the 2 groups. Hyperlipidemia was a risk factor for postoperative morbidity in both the LA and GA groups, while age greater than 75 years was associated with increased overall morbidity in the GA group but not the LA group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that increased age is associated with increased morbidity in CEA under GA, while hyperlipidemia is associated with increased morbidity in CEA regardless of the anesthetic choice.

[Evoked potentials for quality assurance in carotid surgery--a cost effectiveness analysis]. / Evozierte Potentiale zur Qualitätssicherung in der Carotischirurgie--eine Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse.

In order to evaluate the relation between costs and benefit of the use of a temporary shunt during surgery of the carotid artery, we analysed 356 patients undergoing 401 operations of the carotid artery in a period from January 1991 to August 1995 in a retrospective study. The morbidity and mortality during hospital stay were 1.75% respectively 0.75% referring to neurological outcome and death. The potential to economize surgery of the carotid artery by recording the somatosensory evoked potentials in order to select the patients requiring a temporary shunt would be 4.1% of the payment which will be payed from 1996 by the social insurance for carotid endarterectomy. These savings can be realized without loss of quality or higher risk for the patient.

Carotid arterial surgery using local anesthesia: a private practice retrospective study.

Carotid endarterectomy has recently become one of the more controversial operations. The tremendous increase in the number of endarterectomies performed, coupled with the apparent increase in morbidity and mortality associated with this operation in some studies, have brought into question the indications and results of the procedure. The potential for complications from the procedure itself, as well as increased morbidity and mortality from surgery on the elderly, make carotid endarterectomy a dangerous operation that must be done carefully and thoughtfully. The authors have performed carotid endarterectomies exclusively under local anesthesia to more closely evaluate the neurologic status of the patient. They believe that the operation performed in this manner obviates the use of a shunt and its inherent complications in greater than 80 per cent of the patients. This, coupled with the fact that many of the patients also have severe cardiac disease and the use of local anesthesia causes less hemodynamic changes and stress, should make carotid endarterectomy under local anesthesia the preferred approach.