In-depth analysis of the treatment effect and synergistic mechanism of TanReQing injection on clinical multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Antibiotic resistance is a recognized and concerning public health issue. Gram-negative bacilli, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), are notorious for their rapid development of drug resistance, leading to treatment failures. TanReQing injection (TRQ) was chosen to explore its pharmacological mechanisms against clinical multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa (MDR-PA), given its antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties. We revealed the expression of proteins and genes in P. aeruginosa after co-culture with TRQ. This study developed an assessment method to evaluate clinical resistance of P. aeruginosa using MALDI-TOF MS identification and Biotyper database searching techniques. Additionally, it combined MIC determination to investigate changes in MDR-PA treated by TRQ. TRQ effectively reduced the MICs of ceftazidime and cefoperazone and enhanced the confidence scores of MDR-PA as identified by mass spectrometry. Using this evaluation method, the fingerprints of standard P. aeruginosa and MDR-PA were compared, and the characteristic peptide sequence (Seq-PA No. 1) associated with flagellum was found. The phenotypic experiments were conducted to confirm the effect of TRQ on the motility and adhesion of P. aeruginosa. A combination of co-immunoprecipitation and proteome analysis was employed, and 16 proteins were significantly differentially expressed and identified as potential candidates for investigating the mechanism of inhibiting resistance in P. aeruginosa treated by TRQ. The candidates were verified by quantitative real-time PCR analysis, and TRQ may affect these core proteins (MexA, MexB, OprM, OprF, OTCase, IDH, and ASL) that influence resistance of P. aeruginosa. The combination of multiple methods helps elucidate the synergistic mechanism of TRQ in overcoming resistance of P. aeruginosa.IMPORTANCEPseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen closely associated with various life-threatening acute and chronic infections. The presence of antimicrobial resistance and multidrug resistance in P. aeruginosa infections significantly complicates antibiotic treatment. The expression of ß-lactamase, efflux systems such as MexAB-OprM, and outer membrane permeability are considered to have the greatest impact on the sensitivity of P. aeruginosa. The study used a method to assess the clinical resistance of P. aeruginosa using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry identification and Biotyper database search techniques. TanReQing injection (TRQ) effectively reduced the MICs of ceftazidime and cefoperazone in multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa (MDR-PA) and improved the confidence scores for co-cultured MDR-PA. The study found a characteristic peptide sequence for distinguishing whether P. aeruginosa is resistant. Through co-immunoprecipitation and proteome analysis, we explored the mechanism of TRQ overcoming resistance of P. aeruginosa.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of ceftazidime/avibactam: why one leg is not enough to run.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is becoming an increasingly recommended approach for assessing optimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment of ceftazidime/avibactam. Some authors hypothesized that the PK/PD target attainment of ceftazidime/avibactam could be assessed by means of the TDM of solely ceftazidime, since avibactam concentrations might be extrapolated based on the fixed 4:1 ceftazidime-to-avibactam ratio present in the vial. The reliability of this hypothesis could be called into question if a wide interindividual variability in the ceftazidime-to-avibactam ratio would exist among patients. This study aimed to assess the distribution of the individual ceftazidime-to-avibactam ratios in relation to renal function in a cohort of adult patients who were treated with continuous infusion ceftazidime/avibactam and underwent TDM of both ceftazidime and avibactam. METHODS: Individual ceftazidime-to-avibactam ratio was calculated at each TDM assessment. Receiving operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed for testing the potential impact of renal function on ceftazidime-to-avibactam ratio variability. RESULTS: A total of 188 TDM assessments were collected from 107 patients. The ceftazidime-to-avibactam ratios ranged from 1.29:1 to 13.46:1. Seventy-seven out of 188 ceftazidime-to-avibactam ratios (41.0%) were >5:1, and 36 (19.1%) were >6:1. Patients without renal dysfunction had significantly higher proportions of ceftazidime-to-avibactam ratio >5:1 (59.3% versus 23.8%; P < 0.001) and >6:1 (32.1% versus 6.3%; P < 0.001) compared with those with mild-to-severe renal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: The findings may strengthen the contention that for properly assessing the PK/PD target attainment of ceftazidime/avibactam, both ceftazidime and avibactam concentrations should be measured, given the unpredictability of the ceftazidime-to-avibactam ratio occurring among patients.

Emergence of cefiderocol resistance during ceftazidime/avibactam treatment caused by a large genomic deletion, including ampD and piuCD genes, in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

We report the emergence of cefiderocol resistance during the treatment of a ST312 Pseudomonas aeruginosa respiratory infection with ceftazidime/avibactam. whole genome sequencing (WGS) revealed that resistance was caused by a large genomic deletion, including PiuDC (iron transport system) and AmpD (ampC negative regulator), driven by the integration of phage DNA. Thus, our findings alert that this type of deletion could be an efficient (two mechanisms in one step) specific cefiderocol resistance mechanism that might occur nonspecifically upon treatment with ß-lactams that select for AmpC overexpression.

Could an optimized joint pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment of continuous infusion ceftazidime-avibactam be a way to avoid the need for combo therapy in the targeted treatment of deep-seated DTR Gram-negative infections?

The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between joint pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment of continuous infusion (CI) ceftazidime-avibactam and the microbiological outcome of documented difficult-to-treat resistant (DTR) Gram-negative infections. A 2-year retrospective cohort study was performed in patients receiving CI ceftazidime-avibactam mono- or combo therapy for documented DTR Gram-negative infections and undergoing therapeutic drug monitoring of both ceftazidime and avibactam. The free fractions of steady-state concentrations (fCss) of ceftazidime and avibactam were calculated. The joint PK/PD target was considered optimal when both the fCss/MIC ratio for ceftazidime ≥4 (equivalent to 100% fT>4xMIC) and the fCss/CT ratio for avibactam >1 (equivalent to 100% fT >CT of 4.0 mg/L) were simultaneously achieved (quasi-optimal if only one of the two and suboptimal if neither of the two was achieved). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied for testing potential variables associated with microbiological failure. Fifty-eight patients were treated with CI ceftazidime-avibactam mono- (36) or combo therapy (22) for documented DTR Gram-negative infections [74.2% for primary or secondary bloodstream infections (BSIs)]. Combo therapy was administered more frequently to intensive care unit (ICU) patients (P = 0.023) or for pneumonia (P = 0.001) and less frequently for intra-abdominal infections and BSIs (P = 0.04). Microbiological failure occurred in five cases (8.6%, three in mono- and two in combo therapy). In the multivariate analysis, the suboptimal/quasi-optimal joint PK/PD target emerged as the only independent predictor of microbiological failure (odds ratio [OR] 11.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-93.98; P = 0.023), whereas monotherapy was not (P = 0.99). Optimized joint PK/PD target attainment of CI ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy could represent a way forward for allowing microbiological eradication of DTR Gram-negative infections and could render unnecessary combo therapy.

Genotypic Evolution of Klebsiella pneumoniae Sequence Type 512 during Ceftazidime/Avibactam, Meropenem/Vaborbactam, and Cefiderocol Treatment, Italy.

In February 2022, a critically ill patient colonized with a carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae producing KPC-3 and VIM-1 carbapenemases was hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 in the intensive care unit of Policlinico Umberto I hospital in Rome, Italy. During 95 days of hospitalization, ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, and cefiderocol were administered consecutively to treat 3 respiratory tract infections sustained by different bacterial agents. Those therapies altered the resistome of K. pneumoniae sequence type 512 colonizing or infecting the patient during the hospitalization period. In vivo evolution of the K. pneumoniae sequence type 512 resistome occurred through plasmid loss, outer membrane porin alteration, and a nonsense mutation in the cirA siderophore gene, resulting in high levels of cefiderocol resistance. Cross-selection can occur between K. pneumoniae and treatments prescribed for other infective agents. K. pneumoniae can stably colonize a patient, and antimicrobial-selective pressure can promote progressive K. pneumoniae resistome evolution, indicating a substantial public health threat.

Looking for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia treatment: in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam alone and in combination with aztreonam.

During the Sars-Cov-2 pandemic, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S.maltophilia) secondary pulmonary infections have increased, especially in critically ill patients, highlighting the need for new therapeutic options. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT) is the treatment of choice but the increase of resistant strains or adverse drug reactions limited its clinical use. Recently ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) has been approved for the treatment of multi drug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria infections, including hospital acquired pneumonia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) alone and in combination with aztreonam (ATM) against S. maltophilia clinical isolates by E-test method. Susceptibility of SXT and levofloxacin (LEV) was also investigated. Our results showed 22% of resistance to CZA, 2% to SXT and 26% to LEV. CZA in combination with ATM demonstrated synergistic activity against 86% of the strains, including all those resistant to CZA. The combination of CZA with ATM provides a new therapeutic option for the treatment of severe respiratory infections in critically ill patients.

Cefiderocol Treatment for Patients with Multidrug- and Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections in the Compassionate Use Program.

Cefiderocol is an option for infections caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, but its in vitro activity against these isolates and its clinical effectiveness for isolates with MICs of >1 µg/mL is unclear. We investigated the in vitro activity of cefiderocol against P. aeruginosa isolates collected from patients treated with cefiderocol through the compassionate use program and assessed physician-reported clinical response and 28-day all-cause mortality by cefiderocol MIC values. P. aeruginosa isolates underwent susceptibility testing to cefiderocol and comparator agents by using reference broth microdilution. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA; susceptible, ≤1 µg/mL) and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI; susceptible, ≤4 µg/mL) cefiderocol breakpoints were applied. Additionally, molecular characterization of ß-lactamase genes was performed. Clinical response and vital status were reported by treating physicians. Forty-six patients with P. aeruginosa infections were evaluated. Twenty-nine (63%) and 42 (91%) isolates were susceptible to cefiderocol using FDA and CLSI breakpoints, respectively. Thirty-seven (80%) and 32 (70%) isolates were not susceptible to ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam, respectively. The clinical response rate was 69% (20/29) with a cefiderocol MIC of ≤1 µg/mL, 69% (9/13) with a cefiderocol MIC of 2 to 4 µg/mL, and 100% (4/4) with an MIC of ≥8 µg/mL, while day 28 all-cause mortality rates were 23% (6/26; MIC ≤ 1 µg/mL), 33% (4/12; MIC, 2 to 4 µg/mL), and 0% (0/4; MIC ≥8 µg/mL), respectively. Cefiderocol was active in vitro against most P. aeruginosa isolated from patients with limited or no alternative therapies. Patients with cefiderocol MICs of 2 to 4 µg/mL did not have significantly worse outcomes than those with MICs of ≤1 µg/mL.

Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam compared to other antimicrobials for the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strains, a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections are a significant public health issue. CRKP infections can increase the mortality of severely ill hospitalised patients and elevate the financial burden of their hospitalisation globally. Colistin and tigecycline are the main antimicrobials which have been widely used for the treatment of CRKP infections. However, novel antimicrobials have been recently launched. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) seems one of the most efficient ones. AIM: The aim of the current systematic literature review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI compared to other antimicrobials in adult patients (aged >18) with CRKP infection. METHODS: All data were retrieved using PubMed/Medline, the Web of Science and Cochrane library. The main outcome was the effective treatment of CRKP infection or the microbiological eradication of CRKP in the culture of biological samples. Secondary outcomes included the impact on 28- or 30-day mortality and adverse effects, if available. Pooled analysis was conducted using Review Manager v. 5.4.1 software (RevMan). The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: CAZ-AVI was proved more effective than other antimicrobials against CRKP infections and CRKP bloodstream infections (p < 0.00001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Patients in the CAZ-AVI arm displayed statistically lower 28- and 30-day mortality rates (p = 0.002 and p < 0.00001, respectively). Concerning the microbiological eradication, no meta-analysis was feasible due to high heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: The promotion of CAZ-AVI for treating CRKP infections over other antimicrobials seems favourable. However, there is a long way ahead to reveal additional scientific findings to further strengthen this statement.

A descriptive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of continuous infusion ceftazidime-avibactam for treating DTR gram-negative infections in a case series of critically ill patients undergoing continuous veno-venous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF).

PURPOSE: To explore pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profile of continuous infusion (CI) ceftazidime-avibactam for treating difficult-to-treat resistant Gram-negative (DTR-GN) infections in critical patients undergoing continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with CI ceftazidime-avibactam for DTR-GN infections during CVVHDF were retrospectively assessed. Ceftazidime and avibactam concentrations were measured at steady-state and the free fraction (fCss) was calculated. Total clearance (CLtot) of both agents were calculated and the impact of CVVHDF intensity was assessed by linear regression. The joint PK/PD target of ceftazidime-avibactam was defined as optimal when both fCss/MIC≥4 for ceftazidime and fCss/CT > 1 for avibactam were achieved. Relationship between ceftazidime-avibactam PK/PD targets and microbiological outcome was assessed. RESULTS: Eight patients with DTR-GN infections were retrieved. Median fCss were 84.5 (73.7-87.7 mg/L) for ceftazidime and 24.8 mg/L (20.7-25.8 mg/L) for avibactam. Median CLtot was 2.39 L/h (2.05-2.96 L/h) for ceftazidime and 2.56 L/h (2.12-2.98 L/h) for avibactam. Median CVVHDF dose was 38.6 mL/h/kg (35.9-40.0 mL/kg/h). CLtot were linearly correlated with CVVHDF dose (r = 0.53;p = 0.03, and r = 0.64;p = 0.006, respectively). The joint PK/PD targets were optimal granting microbiological eradication in all the assessable cases. CONCLUSION: CI administration of 1.25-2.5 g q8h ceftazidime-avibactam may allow prompt attainment and maintenance of optimal joint PK/PD targets during high-intensity CVVHDF.

Impact of a real-time diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship workflow on time to appropriate therapy for infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms.

INTRODUCTION: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative organisms cause life-threatening infections, and the incidence is rising globally. Timely therapy for these infections has a direct impact on patient survival. This study aimed to determine the impact of a multidisciplinary diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) workflow on time to appropriate therapy (TAP) for these infections using novel beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors. METHODS: This was a retrospective quasi-experimental study of adult patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas (MDR PsA) infections at a 1500 bed university hospital. Included patients who received ≥ 72 hours of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) or ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) from December 2017 to December 2019. During the pre-intervention period (December 2017 to December 2018), additional susceptibilities (including CZA and C/T) were performed only upon providers' request. In 2019, reflex algorithms were implemented for faster identification and testing of all CRE/MDR PsA isolates. Results were communicated in real-time to the AMS team to tailor therapy. RESULTS: A total of 99 patients were included, with no between-group differences at baseline. The median age was 60 years and 56 (56.7%) were in intensive care at the time of culture collection. Identified organisms included 71 (71.7%) MDR PsA and 26 CRE, of which 18 were carbapenemase producers (Klebsiella-producing carbapenemase = 12, New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase = 4, Verona integron-encoded metallo-ß-lactamase = 2). The most common infections were pneumonia (49.5%) and bacteraemia (30.3%). A decrease was found in median TAP (103 [IQR 76.0-156.0] vs. 75 [IQR 56-100] hours; P < 0.001). Median time from culture collection to final susceptibility results was shorter in the post-intervention group (123 vs. 93 hours; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study identified improvement in TAP in MDR PsA and CRE infections with implementation of a reflex microbiology workflow and multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship initiatives.

The primary pharmacology of ceftazidime/avibactam: microbiology from clinical studies, and development of resistance during treatment.

As one of a series of thematically linked reviews of the primary pharmacology of the ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination, ceftazidime/avibactam, this article reviews the microbiological findings in drug-exposed patients. Earlier articles in the series focused on basic in vitro and in vivo translational biology (J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77: 2321-40 and 2341-52) and the development and mechanisms of resistance in vitro (J Antimicrob Chemother 2023: Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac449). In clinical trials of ceftazidime/avibactam, combined favourable microbiological responses for evaluable patients infected at baseline by susceptible Enterobacterales or Pseudomonas aeruginosa were 86.1% (851/988). The corresponding percent favourable among patients infected by ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant pathogens was 58.8% (10/17), noting that the majority (15/17) of the resistant examples were P. aeruginosa. Microbiological response rates to comparator treatments in the same clinical trials ranged between 64% and 95%, depending on the type of infection and the analysis population. Uncontrolled case studies over a wide range of patients infected by antibiotic multiresistant Gram-negative bacteria have demonstrated that ceftazidime/avibactam can elicit microbiological clearance of ceftazidime/avibactam-susceptible strains. In case studies where a matched cohort of patients had been treated with antibacterial agents other than ceftazidime/avibactam, microbiological outcomes were comparable between treatments, mostly being observationally more favourable for ceftazidime/avibactam (recognizing that numbers were too small for definitive superiority assessments). Development of resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam during therapy is reviewed. The phenomenon has been reported multiple times, mostly in difficult-to-treat patients infected by KPC-producing Enterobacterales. Molecular mechanisms, when determined, have frequently been observed previously in vitro, such as the 'Ω-loop' D179Y (Asp179Tyr) substitution found in KPC variant enzymes. In human volunteers exposed to therapeutic levels of ceftazidime/avibactam, faecal numbers of Escherichia coli, other enterobacteria, lactobacilli, bifidobacteria, clostridia and Bacteroides spp. decreased. Clostridioides difficile was detected in the faeces, but this was of uncertain significance, because no unexposed controls were studied.

Simultaneous and divergent evolution of resistance to cephalosporin/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations and imipenem/relebactam following ceftazidime/avibactam treatment of MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.

OBJECTIVES: To describe and characterize the emergence of resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/relebactam in a patient receiving ceftazidime/avibactam treatment for an MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa CNS infection. METHODS: One baseline (PA1) and two post-exposure (PA2 and PA3) isolates obtained before and during treatment of a nosocomial P. aeruginosa meningoventriculitis were evaluated. MICs were determined by broth microdilution. Mutational changes were investigated through WGS. The impact on ß-lactam resistance of mutations in blaPDC and mexR was determined through cloning experiments and complementation assays. RESULTS: Isolate PA1 showed baseline resistance mutations in DacB (I354A) and OprD (N142fs) conferring resistance to conventional antipseudomonals but susceptibility to ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam. Post-exposure isolates showed two divergent ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant phenotypes associated with distinctive mutations affecting the intrinsic P PDC ß-lactamase (S254Ins) (PA2: ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant) or MexAB-OprM negative regulator MexR in combination with modification of PBP3 (PA3: ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/relebactam-relebactam-resistant). Cloning experiments demonstrated the role of PDC modification in resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam. Complementation with a functional copy of the mexR gene in isolate PA3 restored imipenem/relebactam susceptibility. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated how P. aeruginosa may simultaneously develop resistance and compromise the activity of new ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations when exposed to ceftazidime/avibactam through selection of mutations leading to PDC modification and up-regulation of MexAB-OprM-mediated efflux.

A therapeutic regimen of ceftazidime-avibactam for a critical patient receiving prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy.

The present report firstly described a critically ill patient receiving a dosing regimen of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) (1.875g q24h) to eliminate multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and a scheduled time for prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy (PIRRT) every 48h (6h-session beginning 12h after the previous dosage on hemodialysis day). This dosing regimen for CAZ-AVI and a scheduled time for PIRRT allowed pharmacodynamic parameters of ceftazidime and avibactam to have little difference on hemodialysis and non-hemodialysis days so that we can maintain a relatively stable drug concentration. Our report highlighted not only the importance of dosing regimens in patients with PIRRT but also the significance of hemodialysis time points during the dosing interval. The innovative therapeutic plan proved to be suitable for patients infected with Klebsiella pneumoniae when on PIRRT according to the trough plasma concentrations of ceftazidime and avibactam which were maintained above the minimum inhibitory concentration during the dosing interval.

Rapid diagnostics and ceftazidime/avibactam for KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections: impact on mortality and role of combination therapy.

This study was aimed at investigating risk factors for mortality in patients suffering from KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) bloodstream infections (BSIs), evaluating the impact of rapid diagnostics and ceftazidime/avibactam use. This observational retrospective study (January 2017-May 2021) included all patients with a KPC-Kp BSI. Uni-multivariable analyses were carried out to evaluate the effect of clinical variables on both in-hospital death (IHD) and 30-day all-cause mortality, and the role of the combination of ceftazidime/avibactam plus polymyxin. One hundred and ninety-six patients met the study's inclusion criteria. Older age, having undergone renal replacement therapy during the 30 days preceding the KPC-Kp BSI onset, having an INCREMENT-CPE score ≥ 8, and having suffered from a superimposed and/or following KPC-Kp BSI treatment candidemia were found to be the main factors associated with both mortality rates. Among protective factors, the centrality of ceftazidime/avibactam in monotherapy (IHD: OR: 0.34; CI 95%: 0.11-1.00-30-day all-cause mortality: OR: 0.18; CI 95%: 0.04-0.77) or combination (IHD: OR: 0.51; CI 95%: 0.22-1.19-30-day all-cause mortality: OR: 0.62; CI 95%: 0.21-1.84) emerged and became even more evident once the effect of ceftazidime/avibactam plus polymyxin was removed. Rapid diagnostics may be useful to adopt more effective strategies for the treatment of KPC-Kp BSI patients and implement infection control measures, even if not associated with higher patient survival. Ceftazidime/avibactam, even when used alone, represents an important option against KPC-Kp, while combined use with polymyxin might not have altered its efficacy. Patient comorbidities, severity of BSI, and complications such as candidemia were confirmed to have a significant burden on survival.

A novel method to evaluate ceftazidime/avibactam therapy in patients with carbapenemase-producing Enterobactericeae (CPE) bloodstream infections.

INTRODUCTION: This study reports experience managing eight patients with bloodstream infections treated with a continuous infusion of ceftazidime-avibactam. METHODS: Patients who were treated for documented CPE BSIs susceptible to CAZ-AVI and who underwent real-time therapeutic drug monitoring were retrospectively assessed. Ceftazidime MICs were assessed in presence of increasing concentrations of avibactam by the broth microdilution method. An inhibitory sigmoid Emax model was used to characterize ceftazidime MIC reduction as a function of avibactam concentration, and the MICi was derived by conditioning the best-fit model using steady-state avibactam concentrations (Css). Ceftazidime fCss/MICi ratio was calculated for each patient and correlated to microbiological outcome. RESULTS: By adopting the innovative concept of effective MIC with an inhibitor (MICi), a trend towards higher microbiological failure and resistance development was found in patients with a lower ceftazidime fCss/MICi ratio (2/3 vs. 0/5). CONCLUSION: Assessment of changes in the ceftazidime MIC in relation to increasing avibactam concentration could represent a more robust pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic method for predicting microbiological failure given beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations.

Colonization by ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae following therapy in critically ill patients.

OBJECTIVES: Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI)-based treatments have been associated with the emergence of resistance in KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) isolates after antimicrobial exposure. Here, we evaluated the CAZ-AVI resistance development in KPC-Kp isolated from patients treated with CAZ-AVI-based therapy. METHODS: We enrolled adult patients treated with CAZ-AVI-based regimens between January 2020 and January 2021. Carbapenemase-producing isolates collected from clinical samples and rectal swabs were evaluated for CAZ-AVI resistance development after antimicrobial exposure. KPC-Kp developing CAZ-AVI resistance and parental susceptible strains were genomically characterized. Whole genome sequencing was performed by using the Illumina iSeq100 platform and genomes were analyzed for antimicrobial-resistance genes, plasmid and porins sequences. RESULTS: We enrolled 90 patients treated with CAZ-AVI-based therapy and 62.2% (56/90) of them were colonized by KPC-producers before CAZ-AVI-based treatment and 6.6% acquired colonization during therapy. Six (6.6%) patients developed infections because of resistant KPC-Kp after CAZ-AVI exposure and 3 (3.3%) of them developed CAZ-AVI resistance in the rectum. Development of resistance among KPC in the rectum occurred after 32 (IQR, 9-35) days of therapy and after 30 (IQR, 22-40) days in clinical specimens. Genetic analysis demonstrated that the development of CAZ-AVI resistance was associated with mutated blaKPC-3 (blaKPC-31, blaKPC-53, blaKPC-89, and blaKPC-130) and phylogenetic analysis demonstrated a close genomic relationship between KCP-Kp collected from rectum and clinical samples of the same patient. DISCUSSION: Antimicrobial exposure induce a higher incidence of CAZ-AVI resistance development in the blood and respiratory tract than in the rectum (6.7% vs. 3.3%) of CAZ-AVI-treated patients and genome analysis showed that resistance was associated with mutated blaKPC-3 variants.

Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and therapeutic drug monitoring of ceftazidime/avibactam administered by continuous infusion in patients with MDR Gram-negative bacterial infections.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of ß-lactams in critically ill patients has been correlated with better clinical outcomes. Evidence on TDM of newer ß-lactams such as ceftazidime/avibactam administered by continuous infusion (CI) is very limited. OBJECTIVES: To describe our experience with TDM of ceftazidime/avibactam and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment in patients with MDR bacterial infections. Clinical outcomes of ceftazidime/avibactam administered by CI were also assessed. METHODS: Patients treated with ceftazidime/avibactam administered by CI and undergoing TDM of ceftazidime plasma concentrations were included. Blood samples were obtained as part of the TDM program. The PK/PD therapeutic target of ceftazidime/avibactam was defined as 100%fT > 4 × MIC of the causative pathogen, and 100%fT > 10 × MIC was considered overexposure. Dose changes were made according to the TDM results. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were included. Ceftazidime/avibactam total daily doses ranged from 1 g/0.25 g to 6 g/1.5 g. Twenty-six patients (83.9%) achieved a 100%fT > 4 × MIC, 15 (48.4%) of which were overexposed (100%fT > 10 × MIC). Dose reduction was suggested in 16/28 (57.1%) patients and dose maintenance in 12/28 (42.9%). Overall clinical cure was observed in 21 (67.7%) patients, and 18 of these (85.7%) achieved a 100%fT > 4 × MIC. CONCLUSIONS: Administering ceftazidime/avibactam by CI enabled the desired PK/PD target to be achieved in a large proportion of patients, even at lower doses than those recommended for a 2 h extended infusion. We suggest that the use of CI with TDM may be a useful tool for reducing initial doses, which could help to reduce antimicrobial-related adverse effects and treatment costs.

Efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam in various combinations for the treatment of experimental osteomyelitis due to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.

BACKGROUND: Optimal treatment of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) bone infections is poorly defined. This study evaluated the efficacy of the novel beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor-ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI)-with different antibiotic combinations in an experimental model of CPE osteomyelitis. METHODS: KPC-99YC is a clinical strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae with intermediate susceptibility to meropenem (MIC 4 mg/L), gentamicin (MIC 0.25 mg/L), colistin (MIC 0.25 mg/L), fosfomycin (MIC 4 mg/L) and ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC 1 mg/L). Time-kill curves were performed at 4x MIC. Osteomyelitis was induced in rabbits by tibial injection of 2×108 CFU of KPC-99YC. Six groups started treatment 14 days later for 7 days: control, colistin, CAZ-AVI, CAZ-AVI plus gentamicin, CAZ-AVI plus colistin and CAZ-AVI plus fosfomycin. Antibiotic dosages were selected to simulate plasma concentrations obtained in humans. Treatment was evaluated according to bone cultures quantified in log10 CFU. RESULTS: In vitro, CAZ-AVI plus colistin or gentamicin were rapidly bactericidal in contrast with CAZ-AVI plus fosfomycin. In vivo, compared with controls, colistin alone (P = 0.045) and CAZ-AVI alone or in combination significantly lowered bone bacterial counts (P < 0.001). Bone sterilisation was achieved in 67% and 100% of animals with combinations of CAZ-AVI plus colistin or gentamicin (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively) whereas other treatments were no different from controls. CAZ-AVI plus gentamicin provided greater bone bacterial reduction than CAZ-AVI plus colistin (P = 0.033). No CAZ-AVI-resistant strains emerged in treated rabbits, regardless of combination. CONCLUSIONS: CAZ-AVI plus gentamicin was the best effective combination therapy. Combinations with CAZ-AVI appear to be a promising treatment of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae osteomyelitis.

A Systems-Based Analysis of Mono- and Combination Therapy for Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infections.

Antimicrobial resistance is a global threat. As "proof-of-concept," we employed a system-based approach to identify patient, bacterial, and drug variables contributing to mortality in patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKp) bloodstream infections exposed to colistin (COL) and ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ/AVI) as mono- or combination therapies. Patients (n = 49) and CRKp isolates (n = 22) were part of the Consortium on Resistance Against Carbapenems in Klebsiella and other Enterobacteriaceae (CRACKLE-1), a multicenter, observational, prospective study of patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) conducted between 2011 and 2016. Pharmacodynamic activity of mono- and combination drug concentrations was evaluated over 24 h using in vitro static time-kill assays. Bacterial growth and killing dynamics were estimated with a mechanism-based model. Random Forest was used to rank variables important for predicting 30-day mortality. Isolates exposed to COL+CAZ/AVI had enhanced early bacterial killing compared to CAZ/AVI alone and fewer incidences of regrowth compared to COL and CAZ/AVI. The mean coefficient of determination (R2) for the observed versus predicted bacterial counts was 0.86 (range: 0.75 - 0.95). Bacterial subpopulation susceptibilities and drug mechanistic synergy were essential to describe bacterial killing and growth dynamics. The combination of clinical (hypotension), bacterial (IncR plasmid, aadA2, and sul3) and drug (KC50) variables were most predictive of 30-day mortality. This proof-of-concept study combined clinical, bacterial, and drug variables in a unified model to evaluate clinical outcomes.

Acquisition of resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam during infection treatment in Pseudomonas aeruginosa through D179Y mutation in one of two blaKPC-2 gene copies without losing carbapenem resistance.

Ceftazidime/Avibactam (CAZ/AVI) is frequently used to treat KPC-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa (KPC-PA) and Enterobacterales. CAZ/AVI resistance is driven by several mechanisms. In P. aeruginosa this mainly occurs through alteration of AmpC, porins, and/or efflux pump overexpression, whereas in Enterobacterales it frequently occurs through D179Y substitution in the active site of KPC enzyme. This aminoacid change abolishes AVI binding to the KPC active site, hence inhibition is impaired. However, this substitution also decreases KPC-mediated resistance to carbapenems ("see-saw" effect). The goal of this work was to characterize the in vivo acquisition of CAZ/AVI resistance through D179Y substitution in a KPC-PA isolated from a hospitalized patient after CAZ/AVI treatment. Two KPC-PA isolates were obtained. The first isolate, PA-1, was obtained before CAZ/AVI treatment and was susceptible to CAZ/AVI. The second isolate, PA-2, was obtained after CAZ/AVI treatment and exhibited high-level CAZ/AVI resistance. Characterization of isolates PA-1 and PA-2 was performed through short and long-read whole genome sequencing analysis. The hybrid assembly showed that PA-1 and PA-2A had a single plasmid of 54,030 bp, named pPA-1 and pPA-2 respectively. Each plasmid harbored two copies of the bla KPC-containing Tn4401b transposon. However, while pPA-1 carried two copies of bla KPC-2, pPA-2 had one copy of bla KPC-2 and one copy of bla KPC-33, the allele with the D179Y substitution. Interestingly, isolate PA-2 did not exhibit the "see-saw" effect. The bla KPC-33 allele was detected only through hybrid assembly using a long-read-first approach. The present work describes a KPC-PA isolate harboring a plasmid-borne CAZ/AVI resistance mechanism based on two copies of bla KPC-2-Tn4401b and D179Y mutation in one of them, that is not associated with loss of resistance to carbapenems. These findings highlight the usefulness of a fine-tuned combined analysis of short and long-read data to detect similar emerging resistance mechanisms.