Potential Efficacy of Shiunko for Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Monoclonal Antibody-Induced Skin Fissure: A Single Institutional Case Series.

PURPOSE: Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody (anti-EGFR mAb) is the key drug for RAS/BRAF V600E wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, anti-EGFR mAb-induced skin fissures often affect a patient's quality of life. Shiunko, a traditional Japanese topical herbal medicine, is used for burns and dermatitis and may potentially have wound-healing effects. Herein, we report cases of patients with mCRC who were treated with Shiunko for anti-EGFR mAb-induced skin fissure. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with mCRC who received an anti-EGFR mAb-containing regimen and were treated with Shiunko twice a day for skin fissures at the National Cancer Center Hospital East between March 2022 and December 2022. Skin fissures were assessed at baseline and at every visit until 28 days after Shiunko initiation according to CTCAE v5.0. RESULTS: Among the 11 patients, 5 patients were female; the median age was 61 (range, 43-79) years. The median treatment duration with anti-EGFR mAb before Shiunko initiation was 13.1 (range, 6-52) weeks. Skin moisturizer and topical steroids were applied for skin fissures in 11 and 5 patients, respectively. All patients had grade 2 skin fissures at baseline of Shiunko initiation. Two weeks after Shiunko initiation, complete recovery was noted in 4 patients and improvement to grade 1 was noted in 6 patients. There were no Shiunko-related adverse events. Ten patients continued anti-EGFR mAb treatment until disease progression, while 1 patient discontinued anti-EGFR mAb treatment due to severe eruptions. CONCLUSION: Shiunko could be a treatment option for anti-EGFR mAb-induced skin fissure. Further studies are warranted to investigate the efficacy and safety of Shiunko for anti-EGFR mAb-induced skin fissure.

Induction Chemotherapy With 5-Fluorouracil, Cisplatin, and Cetuximab in Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with high-dose cisplatin has become the standard of care for larynx preservation in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN). However, the long-term results are unsatisfactory. Induction chemotherapy (ICT) with docetaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (TPF) is associated with hematologic toxicity, and a safer therapy with comparable efficacy is desired. We conducted a pilot study to investigate the efficacy and safety of 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin/cetuximab (FPE) therapy as a candidate regimen for ICT in comparison with TPF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage cN2/3 LA-SCCHN of the larynx/oropharynx/hypopharynx were treated with FPE or TPF followed by radiotherapy. We reviewed patients' medical records and evaluated treatment efficacy and safety retrospectively. RESULTS: The response rates for ICT and ICT-radiotherapy were 71% and 93%, respectively, in the FPE group and 90% and 89%, respectively, in the TPF group. The 1-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 57% and 100%, respectively, in the FPE group and 70% and 90%, respectively, in the TPF group. TPF was linked to significantly higher rates of Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity during ICT. The rates of Grade 3 or higher toxicity did not differ between the two groups during radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of ICT was comparable between the FPE and TPF groups, whereas FPE was associated with less toxicity. It is suggested that FPE therapy is an alternative ICT regimen to TPF therapy, but further long-term follow-up is needed.

Randomized placebo-controlled phase II trial of high-dose melatonin mucoadhesive oral gel for the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiation therapy concurrent with systemic treatment.

PURPOSE: The objective of this trial was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of melatonin oral gel mouthwashes in the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis (OM) in patients treated with concurrent radiation and systemic treatment for head and neck cancer. METHODS: Randomized, phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (1:1 ratio) of 3% melatonin oral gel mouthwashes vs. placebo, during IMRT (total dose ≥ 66 Gy) plus concurrent Q3W cisplatin or cetuximab. Primary endpoint: grade 3-4 OM or Severe Oral Mucositis (SOM) incidence by RTOG, NCI, and a composite RTOG-NCI scales. Secondary endpoints: SOM duration and grade 2-4 OM or Ulcerative Oral Mucositis (UOM) incidence and duration. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were included in the study. Concurrent systemic treatments were cisplatin (n = 54; 64%) or cetuximab (n = 30; 36%). Compared with the placebo arm, RTOG-defined SOM incidence was numerically lower in the 3% melatonin oral gel arm (53 vs. 64%, P = 0.36). In patients treated with cisplatin, assessed by the RTOG-NCI composite scale, both SOM incidence (44 vs. 78%; P = 0.02) and median SOM duration (0 vs. 22 days; P = 0.022) were significantly reduced in the melatonin arm. Median UOM duration assessed by the RTOG-NCI scale was also significantly shorter in the melatonin arm (49 vs. 73 days; P = 0.014). Rate of adverse events and overall response rate were similar between the two arms. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with melatonin oral gel showed a consistent trend to lower incidence and shorter SOM duration and shorter duration of UOM. These results warrant further investigation in phase III clinical trial.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of the EXTREME regimen for treating recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in older and younger adult patients.

BACKGROUND: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a geriatric cancer. However, older adult patients are frequently underrepresented in large clinical trials. AIMS: The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the EXTREME regimen (platinum + fluorouracil + cetuximab) in older and younger adult patients with HNSCC. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC treated with the EXTREME regimen were retrospectively analyzed. We compare the efficacy and safety in older (aged ≥70 years) younger (aged <70 years) adult patients. Of the 86 patients examined in this study, 21 (24.4%) were older adults. There was no difference in overall response rate (46.9% vs 38.5%, P = .76), median progression-free survival [5.7 months vs 5.8 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.52-1.51, P = .66] and overall survival (OS) (14.6 months vs 15.2 months, HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.43-1.43, P = .44) in younger vs older patients. There was also no difference in the incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events between groups. The exploratory analysis for geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) showed the association with lower GNRI (≤98) and poor OS in older adult patients (37.7 months vs 7.0 months, HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31-0.89, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: The EXTREME regimen with optimal dose modification is safe and effective for both older and younger adult patients with HNSCC. The GNRI can be an indicator to select the older adult patients who can get benefit from the EXTREME regimen.

Magnesium Absorption in Intestinal Cells: Evidence of Cross-Talk between EGF and TRPM6 and Novel Implications for Cetuximab Therapy.

Hypomagnesemia is very commonly observed in cancer patients, most frequently in association with therapy with cetuximab (CTX), a monoclonal antibody targeting the epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR). CTX-induced hypomagnesemia has been ascribed to renal magnesium (Mg) wasting. Here, we sought to clarify whether CTX may also influence intestinal Mg absorption and if Mg supplementation may interfere with CTX activity. We used human colon carcinoma CaCo-2 cells as an in vitro model to study the mechanisms underlying Mg transport and CTX activity. Our findings demonstrate that TRPM6 is the key channel that mediates Mg influx in intestinal cells and that EGF stimulates such influx; consequently, CTX downregulates TRPM6-mediated Mg influx by interfering with EGF signaling. Moreover, we show that Mg supplementation does not modify either the CTX IC50 or CTX-dependent inhibition of ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Our results suggest that reduced Mg absorption in the intestine may contribute to the severe hypomagnesemia that occurs in CTX-treated patients, and Mg supplementation may represent a safe and effective nutritional intervention to restore Mg status without impairing the CTX efficacy.

Evaluation of a Comprehensive Skin Toxicity Program for Patients Treated With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors at a Cancer Treatment Center.

Importance: Up to 90% of patients treated with an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRi) experience cutaneous toxic effects that are negatively associated with quality of life and lead to treatment interruptions. The Skin Toxicity Evaluation Protocol With Panitumumab trial found reduced incidence of skin toxicity and quality of life impairment with preemptive use of doxycycline hyclate, topical corticosteroids, moisturizers, and sunscreen, demonstrating the benefit of prophylactic treatment for skin toxicity. Objective: To evaluate the association of a comprehensive skin toxicity program with adherence to prophylaxis guidelines for the prevention of EGFRi-associated cutaneous toxic effects. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all adult patients receiving at least 1 dose of cetuximab at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in the calendar year 2012 (2 years after publication of the Skin Toxicity Evaluation Protocol With Panitumumab) or the calendar year 2017 (2 years after full implementation of the Skin Toxicities from Anticancer Therapies program). Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were rate of preemptive rash treatment and selection of preemptive agents. Secondary outcomes were incidence of rash, rates of rescue treatments, rates of cetuximab dose changes or interruptions, and overall survival at 2 years. Results: There were 118 patients (85 men; median age, 62.4 years [range, 23.5-91.7 years]) treated with cetuximab in 2012 and 90 patients (70 men; median age, 62.5 years [range, 30.7-90.5 years]) treated with cetuximab in 2017; 11 patients (9%) in 2012 and 31 patients (34%) in 2017 were treated at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute affiliate sites. At cetuximab treatment initiation, 29 patients (25%) in 2012 and 42 patients (47%) in 2017 were prophylactically treated for skin toxicity (P < .001). From 2012 to 2017, preemptive tetracycline use (13 of 29 [45%] to 30 of 42 [71%]; P = .02) and topical corticosteroid use (2 of 29 [7%] to 24 of 42 [57%]; P < .001) increased and topical antibiotic use (23 of 29 [79%] to 18 of 42 [43%]; P = .002) decreased. There was no significant difference in incidence of rash by prophylaxis status. Patients prescribed prophylactic treatment were 94% less likely to require a first rescue treatment for rash (adjusted odds ratio, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.02-0.16; P < .001), 74% less likely to require a second rescue treatment for rash (adjusted odds ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08-0.83; P = .02), and 79% less likely to experience a cetuximab dose change or interruption (adjusted odds ratio, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.81; P = .02) than patients not prescribed prophylactic treatment, adjusting for treatment site and year. Conclusions and Relevance: Dermatologists can add value to oncology care by raising awareness of appropriate treatment options and increasing adherence to evidence-based prophylaxis protocols for EGFRi-associated rash, which is associated with decreased interventions and toxicity-associated chemotherapy interruptions.

Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor-induced hypomagnesemia: a survey of practice patterns among Canadian gastrointestinal medical oncologists.

Background: The optimal management of hypomagnesemia (hMg) induced by epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (egfris) for advanced colorectal cancer is unclear. We surveyed gastrointestinal medical oncologists in Canada to determine practice patterns for the management of egfri-induced hMg. Methods: Based on distribution lists from the Eastern Canadian Colorectal Cancer Consensus Conference and the Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference, medical oncologists were invited to participate in an online questionnaire between November 2013 and February 2014. Results: From the 104 eligible physicians, 40 responses were obtained (38.5%). Panitumumab was more commonly prescribed than cetuximab by 70% of respondents, with 25% prescribing cetuximab and panitumumab equally. Most respondents obtain a serum magnesium level before initiating a patient on an egfri (92.5%) and before every treatment (90%). Most use a reactive strategy for magnesium supplementation (90%) and, when using supplementation, favour intravenous (iv) alone (40%) or iv and oral (45%) dosing. Magnesium sulfate was used for iv replacement, and the most common oral strategies were magnesium oxide (36.4%) and magnesium rougier (18.2%). Under the reactive strategy, intervention occurred at hMg grade 1 (70.3%) or grade 2 (27%). Of the survey respondents, 45% felt that 1-5 of their patients have ever developed symptoms attributable to hMg, and 35% have had to interrupt egfri therapy because of this toxicity, most commonly at grade 3 (30%) or grade 4 (45%) hMg. The most important question about egfri-induced hMg was its relevance to clinical outcomes (45%) and its symptoms (37.5%). Conclusions: In Canada, various strategies are used in the management of egfri-induced hMg, including prophylactic and reactive approaches that incorporate iv, oral, or a combination of iv and oral supplementation. Clinicians are concerned about the effect of hMg on clinical outcomes and about the symptoms that patients experience as a result of this toxicity.

Treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

AIM: Cetuximab was approved in 2008 for treating recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head-and-neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC), and this study assessed the utilization of cetuximab for R/M-HNSCC in a real-world setting. MATERIALS & METHODS: Adult patients with R/M-HNSCC, who initiated systemic therapy between 1 September 2011 and 31 December 2014 and followed through 31 December 2015, were identified from iKnowMed electronic-health-records database (McKesson Specialty Health) supplemented with manual chart-abstraction. RESULTS: For 325 R/M-HNSCC patients; median age 62 years; 82% males, 67% had oropharyngeal cancer, most common first-line (1L) regimen was platinum-based combinations (76%), of whom only 8% received platinum + cetuximab +/- 5-fluorouracil. CONCLUSION: Despite US FDA approval and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommending use of cetuximab for palliative treatment of R/M-HNSCC, our study demonstrates low utilization in 1L and 2L settings, underscoring the need to understand reasons for low utilization.

Topical Plant Polyphenols Prevent Type I Interferon Signaling in the Skin and Suppress Contact Hypersensitivity.

Human keratinocytes were recently shown to respond to anti-EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) drugs with activation of an interferon-κ-driven autocrine loop, leading to enhanced expression of innate antiviral effectors and of the pro-inflammatory chemokines CXCL10 (C-X-C motif chemokine 10) and CCL2 (C-C motif ligand 2). Here we showed active type I interferon signaling in the skin lesions of cancer patients undergoing treatment with the anti-EGFR drug cetuximab. Strong nuclear positivity for Interferon Regulatory Factor 1 and phosphorylated Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 1, enhanced interferon-κ expression and CXCL10 was associated to the epidermal compartment. Notably, 50 micromolar resveratrol and quercetin fully suppressed the low constitutive levels of type I interferon signaling and prevented its activation by the anti-EGFR cetuximab or gefitinib in cultured keratinocytes. In sensitized mice undergoing DNFB (2,4-dinitro-1-fluorobenzene)-induced contact hypersensitivity, local administration of gefitinib prior to elicitation further amplified hapten-induced type I interferon activation, tissue edema, and infiltration by T cells, whereas resveratrol or quercetin suppressed this inflammatory cascade. Overall, these data suggest that topical application of resveratrol or quercetin could be potentially effective in preventing pathological conditions due to overactivation of type I IFN (interferon)-driven circuits in the skin, including the inflammatory manifestations of anti-EGFR drug-induced skin-targeted toxicity.

Importance of magnesium sulfate supplementation in the prevention of hypomagnesemia and hypocalcemia during chemoradiation in head and neck cancer.

In advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, concomitant radiotherapy with cisplatin and/or cetuximab is frequently combined with cisplatin-based induction chemotherapy, which can cause severe hypomagnesemia, hypocalcemia, and hypokalemia. The aim of our study was to analyze the effects of magnesium sulfate supplementation on the incidence of hypomagnesemia, hypokalemia, and hypocalcemia during four cycles of TPF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil) induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant radiotherapy (CRT) with cisplatin and cetuximab. Twenty-five patients included in a phase II prospective study received routine magnesium sulfate infusions before each cycle of cisplatin, and additional supplementation based on laboratory findings. During TPF, the incidence of grade 1/2 and grade 3/4 hypomagnesemia was 16% and 4%, respectively; and increased despite magnesium supplementation during CRT to 72% and 8%, respectively. During TPF, a grade 2 and grade 4 hypocalcemia occurred in 8% and 4%, respectively; and during CRT, it reached 36% (grade 1/2). Grade 1 hypokalemia only was observed during TPF (4%) and CRT (8%). The median amounts of supplemented magnesium sulfate during TPF and CRT were 20 mEq and 50 mEq, respectively. It appears that a low incidence of grade 3/4 hypomagnesemia and hypocalcemia in our patients resulted from intensive magnesium supplementation. Thorough measurements of magnesium and calcium during cisplatin-based chemoradiation protocols in patients with head and neck cancer are crucial in preventing the development of grade 3/4 hypomagnesemia and hypocalcemia.

Docetaxel plus cisplatin plus fluorouracil versus carboplatin plus fluorouracil-cetuximab in first-line setting in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer who did not previously receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, which is standard?

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) is very poor. In the present retrospective study, we compared the impact of docetaxel plus cisplatin plus fluorouracil (TCF), and cisplatin plus fluorouracil plus cetuximab (CF-Ctx) regimens on the prognosis of patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC in first-line. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 70 patients were evaluated as two groups, according to treatment protocol: TCF (n: 47) and CF-Ctx (n: 23). The groups were compared regarding survival. RESULTS: The median progression-free survival was 7.3 and 8.3 months, TCF and CF-Ctx groups, respectively, (P = 0.280). The median overall survival (OS) was 15.6 and 9.3 months for TCF and CF-Ctx groups, respectively, (P = 0.029). The dose reduction and using of granulocyte colony stimulating factor were significantly higher in TCF group (P = 0.048 and P = 0.018, respectively). CONCLUSION: In first-line setting, TCF regimen is superior to CF-Ctx regimen in terms of OS in patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC, who did not previously receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy.

Mitigation of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor-induced side effects utilizing melanin and vascular-specific lasers: A case report series.

The advent of targeted chemotherapy has led to the emergence of new dermatologic toxicities. We sought to use lasers and light devices to treat recalcitrant cutaneous adverse effects related to cancer treatment. Three stage III or IV cancer patients with cutaneous complications due to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors were treated with melanin and vascular-specific laser and light technologies. Two patients reported reduction in papulopustular eruption following pulse dye laser (PDL) treatment. Two patients noted reduction in hair growth following intense pulsed light (IPL) and/or Alexandrite laser treatments. One patient was treated with both the PDL and IPL and reported improvement of both EGFR-induced hypertrichosis and papulopustular eruption. Laser and light devices targeting melanin and hemoglobin can be utilized to mitigate the cutaneous adverse effects associated with EGFR inhibitors in patients who have failed traditional therapies. This represents a new option for the cancer patient who is suffering from chemotherapy-induced side effects.

Toxicity of concurrent stereotactic radiotherapy and targeted therapy or immunotherapy: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Both stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and immune- or targeted therapy play an increasingly important role in personalized treatment of metastatic disease. Concurrent application of both therapies is rapidly expanding in daily clinical practice. In this systematic review we summarize severe toxicity observed after concurrent treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for English literature published up to April 2016 using keywords "radiosurgery", "local ablative therapy", "gamma knife" and "stereotactic", combined with "bevacizumab", "cetuximab", "crizotinib", "erlotinib", "gefitinib", "ipilimumab", "lapatinib", "sorafenib", "sunitinib", "trastuzumab", "vemurafenib", "PLX4032", "panitumumab", "nivolumab", "pembrolizumab", "alectinib", "ceritinib", "dabrafenib", "trametinib", "BRAF", "TKI", "MEK", "PD1", "EGFR", "CTLA-4" or "ALK". Studies performing SRT during or within 30days of targeted/immunotherapy, reporting severe (⩾Grade 3) toxicity were included. RESULTS: Concurrent treatment is mostly well tolerated in cranial SRT, but high rates of severe toxicity were observed for the combination with BRAF-inhibitors. The relatively scarce literature on extra-cranial SRT shows a potential risk of increased toxicity when SRT is combined with EGFR-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitors and bevacizumab, which was not observed for cranial SRT. CONCLUSIONS: This review gives a best-possible overview of current knowledge and its limitations and underlines the need for a timely generation of stronger evidence in this rapidly expanding field.

Adjuvant FOLFOX +/- cetuximab in full RAS and BRAF wildtype stage III colon cancer patients.

Background: RAS mutations have been shown to confer resistance to anti- epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) treatment. We analysed the results of the PETACC8 trial (cetuximab + FOLFOX vs FOLFOX) in full RAS and BRAF wildtype (WT) patients (pts) with resected stage III colon cancer. Patients and methods: Exons 2, 3 and 4 of KRAS and NRAS, and BRAF exons 11 and 15, were sequenced using the Ampliseq colon-lung cancer panel version 2, in PETACC8 trial pts who consented to translational research. The impact of cetuximab on time to recurrence (TTR), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was investigated in pts with tumours harbouring RAS and BRAF WT, and RAS mutations. The prognostic value of each individual mutation was also tested. Results: Among the 2559 pts analysed, 745 pts (29%) were known to have KRAS exon 2 mutations and 163 pts (6.4%) the BRAF V600E mutation. Of the remaining 1651 pts, 1054 were assessed by NGS, showing that a further 227 pts (21%) had KRAS exon 2, 3, 4 or NRAS exon 2, 3, 4 mutations, and that 46 pts (4.4%) had a newly diagnosed BRAF mutation. Cetuximab added to FOLFOX did not significantly improve TTR, DFS or OS in pts with RAS WT or RAS and BRAF WT tumours (HR 0.77-1.03, all P > 0.05). Cetuximab addition was not either significantly deleterious in RAS mutant pts or in pts with rare RAS or BRAF mutations. In the overall trial population, NRAS and KRAS codon 61 mutations were the only rare mutations with the same pejorative prognostic value as KRAS exon 2 or BRAF V600E mutations. Conclusion: Though not significant, the clinically relevant 0.76 adjusted HR observed for DFS in favour of adding cetuximab to FOLFOX, in full RAS and BRAF WT stage III colon cancer pts, may justify a new randomized controlled trial testing EGFR inhibitors in this setting. Clinical trial number: This is an ancillary study of the PETACC8 trial: EUDRACT 2005-003463-23.

Adverse Reaction to Cetuximab, an Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor.

Dear Editor, Inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a new strategy in treatment of a variety of solid tumors, such as colorectal carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, and pancreatic cancer (1). Cetuximab is a chimeric human-murine monoclonal antibody against EGFR. Cutaneous side effects are the most common adverse reactions occurring during epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRI) therapy. Papulopustular rash (acne like rash) develop with 80-86% patients receiving cetuximab, while xerosis, eczema, fissures, teleangiectasiae, hyperpigmentations, and nail and hair changes occur less frequently (2). The mechanism underlying these skin changes has not been established and understood. It seems EGFRI alter cell growth and differentiation, leading to impaired stratum corneum and cell apoptosis (3-5). An abdominoperineal resection of the rectal adenocarcinoma (Dukes C) was performed on a 43-year-old female patient. Following surgery, adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy was applied. After two years, the patient suffered a metastatic relapse. Abdominal lymphadenopathy was detected on multi-slice computer tomography (MSCT) images, with an increased value of the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) tumor marker (maximal value 57 ng/mL). Hematological and biochemical tests were within normal limits, so first-line chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and a 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX4) protocol was introduced. A wild type of the KRAS gene was confirmed in tumor tissue (diagnostic prerequisite for the introduction of EGFRI) and cetuximab (250 mg per m2 of body surface) was added to the treatment protocol. The patient responded well to the treatment with confirmed partial regression of the tumor formations. Three months after the patient started using cetuximab, an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, the patient presented with a papulopustular eruption in the seborrhoeic areas (Figure 1) and eczematoid reactions on the extremities with dry, scaly, itchy skin (Figure 2). Furthermore, hair and nail changes gradually developed, culminating with trichomegaly (Figure 3) and paronychia (Figure 4). The patient was treated with oral antibiotics (tetracycline) and a combination of topical steroids with moisturizing emollients due to xerosis, without reduction of EGFRI therapy and with a very good response. Trichomegaly was regularly sniped with scissors. Nail fungal infection was ruled out by native examination and cultivation, so antiseptics and corticosteroid ointments were introduced for paronychia treatment. During the above-mentioned therapy, apart from skin manifestations, iatrogenic neutropenia grade IV occurred, with one febrile episode, and because of this, the dose of cytostatic drugs was reduced. After 10 months of therapy, progression of the disease occurred with lung metastases, so EGFRI therapy was discontinued and the patient was given second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal carcinoma. This led to gradual resolution of all aforementioned cutaneous manifestations. Since the pathogenesis of skin side-effects due to EGFRI is not yet fully understood, there are no strict therapy protocols. Therapy is mainly based on clinical experience and follows the standard treatments for acne, rosacea, xerosis, paronychia, and effluvium. The therapeutic approach for papulopustular exanthema includes topical and systemic antibiotics for their antimicrobial as well as anti-inflammatory effect, sometimes in combination with topical steroids. Topical application of urea cream with K1 vitamin yielded positive results in skin-changes prevention during EGFRI therapy, especially with xerosis, eczema, and pruritus (6). Hair alterations in the form of effluvium are usually tolerable, and if needed a 2% minoxidil solution may be applied. Trichomegaly or abnormal eyelash growth can lead to serious complications, so ophthalmologic examination is needed. At the beginning of the growth, regular lash clipping may reduce possibility of corneal abrasion (7,8). Nail changes can just be a cosmetic problem (pigmentary changes, brittle nails), and in the occurrence of paronychia or onycholysis (of several or all nails) they result in high morbidity and impair daily activities. Nail management should be started as soon as possible because of slow nail growth and the relatively long half-life of EGFRI. Combination of topical iodide, corticosteroids, antibiotics, and antifungals with avoidance of nail traumatization will yield the best results (9). EGFRI are potentially life prolonging therapies, and our goal as dermatovenereologists is to provide optimal patient care and improve their quality of life in a multidisciplinary collaboration with oncologists, radiotherapists, and ophthalmologists.

A retrospective analysis of patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiation, hyperthermia, and cetuximab: A brief report of outcome.

PURPOSE: Advanced head and neck cancer continues to have a dismal outcome. Chemoradiation remains the current standard of care. Chemoradiation has not achieved the desired increase in survival in locally advanced head and neck cancer. This is a retrospective analysis of six patients treated with hyperthermia, radiation therapy, and cetuximab. We wished to determine if this combination treatment would further improve the outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six patients with squamous cell cancer of the head and neck region were treated with hyperthermia, cetuximab, and radiation therapy. The end points assessed were acute toxicity and immediate response. RESULTS: All the six patients received the planned doses of cetuximab and radiation therapy. Two patients did not complete the planned hyperthermia sessions. All patients developed mucositis and acneiform rashes. None had thermal burns. One hundred percent complete response was observed in all the patients. CONCLUSION: Addition of hyperthermia to cetuximab and radiation therapy is feasible and shows impressive response rates with manageable toxicity profile. Further studies evaluating the same are needed to confirm these findings.

[Analysis of Factors Influencing the Development of Hypomagnesemia in Patients Receiving Cetuximab Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer].

Cetuximab was approved in Japan as the only clinically available molecular targeted drug for the treatment of head and neck cancer. Hypomagnesemia associated with cetuximab is considered one of the most serious adverse events. However, the factors influencing the development of hypomagnesemia are not clear, although the drug was previously approved for the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer. Thus, we studied the factors involved in the development of hypomagnesemia in patients receiving cetuximab therapy for head and neck cancer. Patients' background data and laboratory values before starting cetuximab therapy did not affect the development of hypomagnesemia. Among patients who had never been treated with cisplatin (NT group), 36.4% developed hypomagnesemia. In contrast, all patients who had previously been treated with cisplatin (T group) developed hypomagnesemia (p=0.034). Magnesium is reabsorbed by transient receptor potential subfamily melastatin 6 (TRPM6) in the distal convoluted tubule. The expression level of TRPM6 is controlled by the epidermal growth factor (EGF) pathway. Cetuximab is an EGF receptor inhibitor and reduces the expression of TRPM6. Additionally, recent studies have shown that the expression of TRPM6 is reduced by cisplatin. Therefore, we considered that the serum magnesium level was cumulatively reduced by cetuximab and cisplatin. In conclusion, the T group was more likely to develop hypomagnesemia than the NT group, and therefore the serum magnesium level in the T group requires careful monitoring so that magnesium supplementation can be provided to patients when the level decreases.

Phase I study of cetuximab in combination with 5-fluorouracil, mitomycin C and radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced anal cancer.

BACKGROUND: 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and mitomycin C (MMC)-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is standard treatment for anal squamous cell carcinoma. In this phase I study cetuximab was added and the primary aim was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 5FU and MMC in this combination. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with locally advanced anal cancer, T2 (≥4 cm)-4N0-3M0, received weekly standard doses of cetuximab starting 1 week before CRT. Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) was given to 57.5/54.0/48.6 Gy in 27 fractions to primary tumour/lymph node metastases/adjuvant lymph node regions. 5FU/MMC was given concomitantly on RT weeks 1 and 5 according to a predefined dose escalation schedule. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were enrolled. Two patients discontinued cetuximab due to hypersensitivity reaction. The median age was 65 years (range 46-70), nine were females, and 85% had stage IIIB disease. Dose-limiting toxicity events (diarrheoa, febrile neutropenia and thrombocytopenia) occurred in 3 of 11 patients. The most common grade 3-4 side-effects were radiation dermatitis (63%), haematologic toxicity (54%), and diarrheoa (36%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Three months following completion of treatment, ten patients (91%) had a local complete remission (CR), but two patients had developed liver metastases, yielding a total CR rate of 73%. CONCLUSION: The MTDs were determined as 5FU 800 mg/m(2) on RT days 1-4 and 29-32 and MMC 8 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 29 when combined with IMRT/VMAT with SIB and cetuximab in locally advanced anal cancer.

Efficacy of neoadjuvant cetuximab alone or with platinum salt for the treatment of unresectable advanced nonmetastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: Refractory locally advanced or metastatic nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is a frequent therapeutic impasse. OBJECTIVES: To address the question of the efficacy of induction therapy with cetuximab as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced NMSC. METHODS: From 2008 to 2013, all patients with a diagnosis of unresectable locally advanced skin squamous cell carcinoma were treated with neoadjuvant cetuximab alone (CM) or combined with a platinum salt and 5-fluorouracil (CC). Resectability, and clinical and pathological response, as well as relapse-free and overall survival were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients, with a median age of 74·5 years, were evaluated. Twenty-five patients received CC. After three cycles of CC, 23 of 25 patients whose tumours were initially unresectable became amenable to surgery (92%). A complete histological response was observed in 15 (65%) patients. The mean progression-free and mean overall survival in operated patients were 8·5 and 26·0 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was a good response in terms of resectability and tumour control in the majority of patients, with few relapses, despite the initially poor prognosis of these tumours in this elderly group of patients. However, this therapeutic strategy needs to be validated in a prospective, randomized study.