Maintenance zinc therapy after initial penicillamine chelation to treat symptomatic hepatic Wilson's disease in resource constrained setting.

BACKGROUND: Experience with zinc in treating symptomatic hepatic Wilson's disease (WD) is limited. AIM: To study the efficacy of Penicillamine followed by zinc in treating symptomatic hepatic Wilson's disease. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed case records of 31 symptomatic hepatic WD patients for whom disease severity scores (Child's, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), Nazer's, and New Wilson Index (NWI) score) and 24-h urinary copper were compared at 3-time points-baseline at presentation, at transition from penicillamine to zinc and at end of follow up. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (median age 11 [5-24] years) with symptomatic hepatic WD were studied; ten had associated neuropsychiatric manifestations of WD. Penicillamine was changed to zinc sulfate either due to financial constraints (28 patients) or due to adverse effects of penicillamine (3 patients). At presentation (baseline), six patients belonged to Child's class A, five to Child's B, and 17 to Child's C. Duration of initial penicillamine chelation therapy was 134 (2-320) weeks, and of subsequent zinc therapy was 363 (35-728) weeks. There was a significant improvement in liver function tests and disease severity scores (Child's, MELD, Nazer's, and NWI score) at the transition from penicillamine to zinc compared to baseline. This improvement was maintained until the end of study period with 90% survival at 10 (2-20) years. Fifteen of the 17 Child's C cirrhotic patients showed significant improvement in disease severity scores from baseline until end of follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Penicillamine followed by zinc may be a safe and effective treatment in resource-constrained setting for symptomatic hepatic WD patients in all grades of baseline disease severity. Some patients with decompensated cirrhosis due to WD may be managed with medical treatment, avoiding liver transplantation.

Phosphate-Binder Use in US Dialysis Patients: Prevalence, Costs, Evidence, and Policies.

Medicare costs for phosphate binders for US dialysis patients and patients with chronic kidney disease enrolled in Medicare Part D exceeded $1.5 billion in 2015. Previous data have shown that Part D costs for mineral and bone disorder medications increased faster than costs for all Part D medications for dialysis patients. Despite extensive use of phosphate binders and escalating costs, conclusive evidence is lacking that they improve important clinical end points in dialysis patients or non-dialysis-dependent patients with chronic kidney disease. Using dialysis patient data from the US Renal Data System and laboratory information from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) CROWNWeb data, we update information on trends in phosphate-binder use, calcium and phosphorus values, and costs for Medicare-covered dialysis patients. We discuss these results in the context of evidence from clinical trials, meta-analyses, and observational studies evaluating phosphate-binder efficacy, safety, comparative effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness. Based on our analysis, we note a need for US Food and Drug Administration guidance regarding clinical evaluation of new phosphate binders, and we suggest that it would be in CMS' best interest to fund a clinical trial to assess whether lower versus higher phosphate concentrations improve hard clinical outcomes, and if so, whether particular phosphate binders are superior to placebo or other binders in improving these outcomes.

A Real-world Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Sevelamer Versus Calcium Acetate in Korean Dialysis Patients.

PURPOSE: Sevelamer, a noncalcium phosphate binder, has been shown to attenuate the progression of vascular calcification and improve survival in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing dialysis compared with calcium-based binders. Using real-world data from a cohort study and the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database, we conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing sevelamer with calcium acetate in dialysis patients from the perspective of the National Health Insurance Service in South Korea. METHODS: Data (demographic, diagnostic, laboratory, and survival) from 4674 patients undergoing dialysis enrolled in a multicenter prospective cohort study conducted in South Korea between September 2008 and December 2012 were linked to phosphate binder use, hospitalization, and cost data available from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. After propensity score matching, a dataset comprising comparable patients treated with either sevelamer (n = 501) or calcium acetate (n = 501) was used in the cost-effectiveness analysis. A Markov model was used to estimate costs, life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and cost-effectiveness over each patient's lifetime. Forty-month treatment-specific overall survival (OS) data available from the dataset were extrapolated to lifetime survival with the use of regression analysis. FINDINGS: Patients had a mean age of 56.3 years and were treated with dialysis for a mean duration of 67.6 months. Compared with calcium acetate, sevelamer was associated with an incremental cost of South Korean Won (₩) 12,246,911 ($10,819) and a gain of 1.758 life years and 1.108 QALYs per patient. This outcome yielded incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of ₩6,966,350 ($6154) and ₩11,057,699 ($9768) per life year and QALY gained, respectively. Conclusions regarding sevelamer's cost-effectiveness were insensitive to alternative assumptions in time horizon, discount rate, hospitalization rate, costs, and health utility estimates, and they remained consistent in 100% of the model iterations, considering a willingness-to-pay threshold of ₩31,894,720 ($28,176) per QALY gained. IMPLICATIONS: This analysis of real-world data found that sevelamer's higher cost relative to calcium acetate was adequately offset by improved survival among patients undergoing dialysis in South Korea. As such, sevelamer offers good value for money, representing a cost-effective alternative to calcium-based binders.

Management of hyperphosphataemia in chronic kidney disease: summary of National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guideline.

Bone disease and ectopic calcification are the two main consequences of hyperphosphataemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Observational studies have demonstrated that hyperphosphataemia in CKD is associated with increased mortality. Furthermore, the use of phosphate binders in dialysis patients is associated with significantly lower mortality. The UK Renal Registry data show significant underachievement of phosphate targets in dialysis patients. It is believed to be due to wide variation in how management interventions are used. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has developed a guideline on the management of hyperphosphataemia in CKD. This is based on the evidence currently available using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. This review outlines the recommendations including research recommendations and discusses methodology, rationale and challenges faced in developing this guideline and the health economic model used to assess the cost-effectiveness of different phosphate binders.

Orals in the bundle: a policy framework.

Oral prescription drugs for treatment of bone and mineral disorders (phosphate binders and calcimimetics) in patients undergoing dialysis (i.e., those with ESRD) will be integrated into the Medicare Part B ESRD bundled payment system in 2016. Payment will be denied under Medicare Part D. Integrating Part D drugs into Part B payment at this level of scale lacks any policy precedent. Providers and patients have serious concerns about the potential for inadequate funding, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has been silent about the methods and other critical policy used to guide its decisions. We believe an adequate policy framework to support valuation of the targeted oral drugs depends on use of the most recent available Medicare Part D data, measurement of mean utilization for all target drugs based on a minimum of 6 months of complete data for prescriptions and dialysis treatments, use of appropriate price proxies to monetize drug volume to dialysis provider acquisition cost, adjustment to account for change in adherence due to change in patient out-of-pocket expenses, inclusion of valuation for dispensing and administrative cost, and a mechanism for adjusting payment to future changes in adherence.

Effectiveness and cost-efficacy of phosphate binders in hemodialysis.

OBJECTIVES: Worldwide, incidence rates of chronic renal insufficiency have clearly increased over the past decade, especially in people of older age. Hyperphosphatemia is the strongest independent risk factor for mortality in renal patients. In order to reduce serum phosphate concentrations to recommended values, phosphate binders (P binders) are used to bind ingested phosphate in the digestive tract. Besides the traditional therapies with calcium and aluminium salts, sevelamer and lanthanum represent recent developments on the market. The purpose of the present health technology assessment (HTA) report was to compare the effectiveness and safety of different P binders in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. METHODS: Based on a systematic literature search followed by a two-part selection process with predefined criteria 18 publications were included in the assessment. RESULTS: All P binders effectively controlled serum phosphate, calcium and parathyroid hormone concentrations. The numbers of hypercalcemic episodes were higher when using calcium-containing P binders compared to sevelamer and lanthanum. Regarding mortality rate, cardiovascular calcification and bone metabolism no definite conclusions could be drawn; however, sevelamer seemed to be more effective than calcium in certain patient subgroups, such as older patients and patients with preexisting arterial calcification. CONCLUSIONS: From a medical point of view, sevelamer showed superiority over calcium-containing P binders at least for special indications.

Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of lanthanum carbonate as second-line therapy in hemodialysis patients in Japan.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Lanthanum carbonate (LC) is a nonaluminum, noncalcium phosphate binder that is effective for hyperphosphatemia in dialysis patients. However, its efficacy and cost-effectiveness as second-line therapy have not been fully examined. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We first conducted a multicenter, open-label, 16-week clinical trial to examine the effect of additive LC in 116 hemodialysis patients who had uncontrolled hyperphosphatemia with conventional phosphorus-lowering therapy alone. Based on these clinical data, a state transition model was developed to evaluate the benefits and costs associated with LC as second-line therapy. Reduced risks for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among patients treated with LC arise through more of the population achieving the target phosphorus levels. Uncertainty was explored through sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: After 16 weeks of additive LC treatment, mean serum phosphorus levels decreased from 7.30 ± 0.90 to 5.71 ± 1.32 mg/dl, without significant changes in serum calcium or intact parathyroid hormone levels. A subsequent cost-effectiveness analysis showed that compared with conventional treatment, additive LC incurred an average additional lifetime cost of $22,054 per person and conferred an additional 0.632 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $34,896 per QALY gained. Applying a cost-effectiveness threshold of $50,000 per QALY, a probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that additive LC had a 97.4% probability of being cost-effective compared with conventional treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the use of LC as second-line therapy would be cost-effective among hemodialysis patients with uncontrolled hyperphosphatemia in Japan.

[Phosphorus (P) chelant in dialysis: efficacy and cost. Peritoneal dialysis solutions]. / Quelantes de fósforo (P) en diálisis: eficacia y coste. Soluciones de diálisis peritoneal.

Sevelamer use has a high prevalence, and half of patients are treated with this noncalcium binder. Two randomized studies appeared in 2007 that compared the efficacy of sevelamer over calcium salts. In the more statistically potent of the two studies, no differences were found in mortality between the sevelamer and calcium groups, except for a benefit in favor of sevelamer in patients older than 65 years. In the other less statistically potent study, lower mortality was observed in the sevelamer group. Both studies have various deficiencies and a timely meta-analysis of the two studies appearing that same year concluded that there was no significant evidence demonstrating a superior efficacy of sevelamer over calcium salts. Therefore, generalized extension of its use as a first-line binder is not recommended. However, its use can be assessed in specific clinical situations. With regard to the cost-benefit ratio, as there is no evidence that greater clinical benefits are obtained with sevelamer than with calcium salts, prudence and moderation in its use are needed because of the high cost/benefit ratio demonstrated. Otherwise, we will contribute to increasing the already very high treatment cost in these patients, with one of the highest costs per life year gained in medicine. The cost/benefit ratio of sevelamer remains unattractive from an economic point of view, even if dialysis and transplant are excluded in these patients.

Withdrawal of penicillamine from zinc sulphate-penicillamine maintenance therapy in Wilson's disease: promising, safe and cheap.

BACKGROUND: Penicillamine, once considered the cornerstone of treatment for Wilson disease (WD), is rather expensive and toxic, and often causes neurological worsening. Zinc sulphate, aiming at the treatment of free-copper toxicosis, has emerged as effective, safe and cheap alternative. AIM: To assess the effect of withdrawal of penicillamine from maintenance treatment with penicillamine and zinc sulphate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 45 patients of WD (M:F: 28:17; age at diagnosis: 13.5+/-63 years), on both penicillamine (P) and zinc sulphate (Zn), couldn't continue penicillamine due to financial constraints. Their clinical data, disability and impairment scores (Schwab and England (S&E) score, Neurological Symptom Score (NSS), and Chu staging) and follow-up data of patients maintained only on zinc sulphate were recorded. RESULTS: Majority of patients (84.4%) had neuropsychiatric manifestations. The mean duration of treatment with penicillamine (P) and zinc sulphate (P+Zn), before stopping penicillamine, was 107.4+/-67.3 months. 40 patients improved variably, while the rest didn't. They received only zinc sulphate for 27.2+/-8.5 months (range: 12 to 34) and 44 patients (97.7%) remained status quo or improved marginally. Only one patient reported worsening in dysarthria. Their disability and impairment scores during combination (penicillamine and zinc sulphate) and Zn alone were: Chu (1.3+/-0.5 vs. 1.5+/-1.9; p=0.4), NSS (1.8+/-3.1 vs. 1.5+/-2.3; p=0.03) and S&E (96.4+/-5.6 vs. 98.6+/-3.5; p=0.03). There were no adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Withdrawal of penicillamine from zinc sulphate/penicillamine maintenance therapy for patients with Wilson's disease was effective, safe and economic, for almost all patients. This retrospective study reiterates that zinc sulphate may be used as a preferred mode of treatment for patients with Wilson's disease.

RenaGel efficacy in severe secondary hyperparathyroidism.

BACKGROUND: Haemodialysis patients frequently have simultaneous hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia, posing a therapeutic dilemma for the traditional calcium--and aluminum--based binders. RenaGel (sevelamer hydrochloride) is an effective phosphate binder without changes in serum calcium or aluminum levels. However being an expensive medication it is currently used mainly for patients with moderate to severe secondary hyperparathyroidism. However most of the previous studies have not included patients with severe secondary hyperparathyroidism. METHODS: Our purpose is to determine RenaGel binder efficacy in haemodialysis patients with severe secondary hyperparathyroidism. As a secondary purpose we have followed the variations of parathyroid hormone, serum calcium, serum lipids [low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides and Lipoprotein(a)], uric acid and bicarbonate. All phosphate binders previously used were suspended one week before RenaGel prescription. Our study included 18 adult haemodialysis patients, with PTHi of 810 +/- 330 pg/ml after the "pre-treatment" washout. The binder was administered during 12 weeks, beginning with a mean dose of 2.4 +/- 0.4 g daily and adjusted to obtain serum phosphorus under 6.5 mg/dl (at the end of the study, the mean RenaGel dose was 2.8 +/- 0.6 g daily. RESULTS: The mean changes after RenaGel in serum phosphorus was -0.7 +/- 1.5. mg/dl (P < 0.05), in serum calcium was 0.5 +/- 1.0 mg/dl (P < 0.05) and in calcium x phosphate product of -4.0 +/- 12.4 mg/dl (P = NS). "Post-treatment" the PTHi levels remained stable (820 +/- 360 pg/ml vs 810 +/- 330) but serum alkaline phosphatase increased (14.3 +/- 14.4 U/l; P < 0.01). LDL cholesterol serum levels decreased by -35 +/- 10 mg/dl (P < 0.01), HDL cholesterol showed a trend to increase (3.0 +/- 8.1 U/l; P = NS), triglycerides decreased by 38 +/- 56 mg/dl (P < 0.05) and Lipoprotein(a) remained stable. Serum albumin increased by 0.1 +/- 0.2 g/L (P < 0.05), uric acid decreased -0.8 +/- 1.2 mg/dl (P < 0.05) and bicarbonate remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: RenaGel is an effective phosphate binder, even in haemodialysis patients with severe secondary hyperparathyroidism. The lipid profile improved with the treatment, with the exception of Lipoprotein(a) stabilization. Selection of patients with severe secondary hyperparathyroidism at the beginning of RenaGel disposal, for economic reasons is debatable, but could be correct.