Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Tradit Chin Med ; 40(3): 440-446, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32506858

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of honey mouthwash 12.5% and chlorhexidine solution 0.2% to reduce the rate of oropharyngeal bacterial colonization in mechanically-ventilated patients. METHODS: This study was a randomized, single blind, phase Ⅲ controlled clinical trial. Sixty patients newly admitted to internal and trauma Intensive Care Units of the two educational hospitals of Sanandaj city affiliated with Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences were selected by convenience sampling and allocated to two groups of 30 patients using random blocks design. In each group, the mouthwash was applied twice a day for four consecutive days. Swab samples were taken from the mouth and throat of all patients three times a day (pre- intervention, two days, and four days after the intervention) and then the samples were transferred onto the blood agar and eosin methylene blue (EMB) culture plates and investigated for bacterial growth and colonization after 24-48 h. RESULTS: The findings showed that oropharyngeal colonization was not significantly different between the two groups, pre-intervention, two days, and four days after the intervention (P > 0.05). Rinsing with honey mouthwash 12.5% led to the inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa on the fourth day of the intervention in all samples. CONCLUSION: None of the studied solutions contributed to the reduction of oropharyngeal bacterial colonization. It seems that the growth inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa by the honey 12.5% mouthwash in mechanically-ventilated patients need further investigation.


Subject(s)
Chlorhexidine/administration & dosage , Honey/analysis , Mouthwashes/administration & dosage , Oropharynx/microbiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/drug effects , Bacteria/genetics , Bacteria/growth & development , Chlorhexidine/analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Microbiota , Middle Aged , Mouth/microbiology , Mouthwashes/analysis , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Respiration, Artificial , Single-Blind Method , Young Adult
2.
Curr Microbiol ; 77(6): 988-996, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31997000

ABSTRACT

This work compared the inhibition effect of the commercially available mouthwash Corsodyl, containing 0.1% chlorhexidine digluconate, and photodynamic inactivation (PDI) employing methylene blue (MB) with irradiation from a red laser on 24-h biofilms formed by Streptococcus mutans strains on hydroxyapatite surfaces. The cytotoxicity of Corsodyl and MB was evaluated by Galleria mellonella surviving assay. The viability of biofilm cells after exposure to mouthwash and PDI was determined by counting colony-forming units. The inhibitory effect of antimicrobial agents was confirmed by confocal scanning laser microscopy. MB did not exhibit a cytotoxic effect on larval survival. Non-diluted Corsodyl slightly decreased the survival of larvae. Using our PDI parameters achieved better inhibition than with non-PDI, proving a significant effect on the eradication of S. mutans biofilms and therefore could be an appropriate supplement for the eradication of dental caries.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Biofilms/drug effects , Mouthwashes/pharmacology , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacology , Streptococcus mutans/drug effects , Animals , Biofilms/growth & development , Chlorhexidine/analogs & derivatives , Chlorhexidine/analysis , Chlorhexidine/pharmacology , Colony Count, Microbial , Durapatite , Larva/drug effects , Lasers , Methylene Blue/pharmacology , Methylene Blue/radiation effects , Microbial Viability/drug effects , Moths/drug effects , Mouthwashes/chemistry , Streptococcus mutans/physiology
3.
Anesthesiology ; 129(6): 1140-1148, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30247201

ABSTRACT

WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THIS TOPIC: WHAT THIS ARTICLE TELLS US THAT IS NEW: BACKGROUND:: Oropharyngeal care with chlorhexidine to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia is currently questioned, and exhaustive microbiologic data assessing its efficacy are lacking. The authors therefore aimed to study the effect of chlorhexidine mouthwash on oropharyngeal bacterial growth, to determine chlorhexidine susceptibility of these bacteria, and to measure chlorhexidine salivary concentration after an oropharyngeal care. METHODS: This observational, prospective, single-center study enrolled 30 critically ill patients under mechanical ventilation for over 48 h. Oropharyngeal contamination was assessed by swabbing the gingivobuccal sulcus immediately before applying 0.12% chlorhexidine with soaked swabs, and subsequently at 15, 60, 120, 240, and 360 min after. Bacterial growth and identification were performed, and chlorhexidine minimal inhibitory concentration of recovered pathogens was determined. Saliva was collected in 10 patients, at every timepoint, with an additional timepoint after 30 min, to measure chlorhexidine concentration. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty bacterial samples were analyzed and identified 48 pathogens including Streptococci (27.1%) and Enterobacteriaceae (20.8%). Oropharyngeal contamination before chlorhexidine mouthwash ranged from 10 to 10 colony-forming units (CFU)/ml in the 30 patients (median contamination level: 2.5·10 CFU/ml), and remained between 8·10 (lowest) and 3·10 CFU/ml (highest count) after chlorhexidine exposure. These bacterial counts did not decrease overtime after chlorhexidine mouthwash (each minute increase in time resulted in a multiplication of bacterial count by a coefficient of 1.001, P = 0.83). Viridans group streptococci isolates had the lowest chlorhexidine minimal inhibitory concentration (4 [4 to 8] mg/l); Enterobacteriaceae isolates had the highest ones (32 [16 to 32] mg/l). Chlorhexidine salivary concentration rapidly decreased, reaching 7.6 [1.8 to 31] mg/l as early as 60 min after mouthwash. CONCLUSIONS: Chlorhexidine oropharyngeal care does not seem to reduce bacterial oropharyngeal colonization in critically ill ventilated patients. Variable chlorhexidine minimal inhibitory concentrations along with low chlorhexidine salivary concentrations after mouthwash could explain this ineffectiveness, and thus question the use of chlorhexidine for ventilator-associated pneumonia prevention.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Bacteria/drug effects , Chlorhexidine/therapeutic use , Critical Illness , Mouthwashes/therapeutic use , Oropharynx/microbiology , Respiration, Artificial , Aged , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/analysis , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/pharmacology , Chlorhexidine/analysis , Chlorhexidine/pharmacology , Colony Count, Microbial , Critical Care , Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Female , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control , Prospective Studies , Saliva/chemistry , Streptococcus/drug effects
4.
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces ; 87(2): 310-8, 2011 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21676601

ABSTRACT

The kinetic of chlorhexidine digluconate (CHXDG) uptake from aqueous solution by hydroxyapatite (HA) was investigated by ultraviolet (UV) analysis performed in HA powder (UV-solid) after the CHX adsorption. Adsorption isotherm of chlorhexidine (CHX) uptake was modeled by a combination of Languimir and Langmuir-Freundlich mechanisms. Strong molecule-molecule interactions and positive cooperativity predominated in the surface when CHX concentration was above 8.6 µg(CHX)/mg(HA). UV-solid spectra (shape, intensity and band position) of CHX bound to HA revealed that long-range molecular structures, such as aggregates or micelles, started to be formed at low CHX concentrations (1.52 µg(CHX)/mg(HA)) and predominated at high concentrations. Grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXRD) analysis from synchrotron radiation discarded the formation of crystalline structures on HA surface or precipitation of CHX crystalline salts, as suggested in previous works. The effect of the HA/CHX association on HA in vitro bioactivity, cytotoxicity and CHX antimicrobial activity was evaluated. It was shown that CHX did not inhibit the precipitation of a poorly crystalline apatite at HA/CHX surface after soaking in simulating body fluid (SBF). Cell viability studies after exposure to extracts of HA and HA/CHX showed that both biomaterials did not present significant in vitro toxicity. Moreover, HA/CHX inhibited Enterococcus faecalis growth for up to 6 days, revealing that binding to HA did not affect antimicrobial activity of CHX and reduced bacterial adhesion. These results suggested that HA/CHX association could result in a potential adjuvant antimicrobial system for clinical use.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/chemistry , Biocompatible Materials/chemistry , Chlorhexidine/chemistry , Delayed-Action Preparations/chemistry , Durapatite/chemistry , Enterococcus faecalis/drug effects , Adsorption , Animals , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/analysis , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/pharmacology , BALB 3T3 Cells , Biocompatible Materials/analysis , Biofilms/drug effects , Biofilms/growth & development , Body Fluids/chemistry , Chlorhexidine/analysis , Chlorhexidine/pharmacology , Delayed-Action Preparations/analysis , Delayed-Action Preparations/pharmacology , Durapatite/analysis , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Humans , Mice , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Microspheres , Molecular Mimicry , Mouth/drug effects , Mouth/microbiology , Photoelectron Spectroscopy , Surface Properties , X-Ray Diffraction
5.
J Dent Res ; 71(8): 1493-7, 1992 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1324262

ABSTRACT

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was used for determination of the effects of chlorhexidine (CHX) solutions (0.2% and 1% solutions of the digluconate salt) on the elemental composition of hydroxyapatite surfaces. So that the nature of the adsorbed species after they were washed with water could be identified, comparisons were made with reference spectra for CHX obtained from a CHX digluconate film and CHX dichloride powder. The XPS results clearly indicated the retention of CHX moieties, which could be ascertained from the spectra by the presence of N and Cl, features unique to CHX. The spectral envelopes were virtually identical to those obtained from the reference spectra. High-resolution C 1s spectra also gave support for the retention of CHX; however, the spectra differed from those of the CHX digluconate film in that no feature attributable to the C-OH of the gluconate anion was present, consistent with the view that the CHX cation remains behind to form an electrostatic bond with the phosphate groups of the hydroxyapatite. The N:Cl ratio for the washed samples was found to be higher than that for the reference samples and may be indicative of partial decomposition of the CHX. Decomposition was also seen to be induced by x-ray exposure. While the high-resolution spectra presented here do not directly address the controversy on the mechanism for the anti-plaque efficacy of CHX, they do provide the necessary basis for the application of XPS to future in vitro studies on the retention of CHX to dental surfaces.


Subject(s)
Chlorhexidine/analogs & derivatives , Hydroxyapatites/chemistry , Adsorption , Calcium/analysis , Calcium/chemistry , Carbon/analysis , Carbon/chemistry , Chlorhexidine/analysis , Chlorhexidine/chemistry , Chlorhexidine/radiation effects , Chlorine/analysis , Chlorine/chemistry , Durapatite , Electron Probe Microanalysis , Hydroxyapatites/analysis , Nitrogen/analysis , Nitrogen/chemistry , Oxygen/analysis , Oxygen/chemistry , Phosphorus/analysis , Phosphorus/chemistry , Surface Properties , X-Rays
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL