Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 84
Filter
Add more filters

Complementary Medicines
Publication year range
1.
J Ethnopharmacol ; 312: 116449, 2023 Aug 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37023835

ABSTRACT

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Jinhongtang as a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formula, has been widely used as a clinical adjuvant in the treatment of acute abdominal diseases and sepsis. Clinical benefits of the concurrent use of Jinhongtang and antibiotics have been observed, however, the mechanism has not been fully understood. AIM OF THE STUDY: The present study aimed to explore the effect of Jinhongtang on the antibacterial activity of Imipenem/Cilastatin and to clarify the underlying mechanism of herb-drug interaction (HDI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mouse model of sepsis induced by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) was used to evaluate the pharmacodynamic interaction in vivo. In vitro antibacterial activity of Imipenem/Cilastatin was studied by determining minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC). Pharmacokinetic interaction was investigated by pharmacokinetic studies in rats and uptake assays using OAT1/3-HEK293 cells. The main constituents ingested into blood of rats were qualitatively identified by UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS. RESULTS: Mice treated by Imipenem/Cilastatin and Jinhongtang exhibited higher survival rate, lower bacteria load and less inflammation in blood and lung tissues, compared with those treated by Imipenem/Cilastatin alone after injection of S. aureus. However, MIC and MBC of Imipenem/Cilastatin against S. aureus in vitro were not significantly changed in the presence of Jinhongtang. On the contrary, Jinhongtang increased the plasma concentration of Imipenem and decreased its urinary excretion in rats. CLr of Imipenem was reduced by 58.5%, while its half-life (t1/2) was prolonged for approximate 1.2 times after coadministered Jinhongtang. Furthermore, the extracts of Jinhongtang, single herb in the prescription, and main absorbable constituents inhibited cellular uptake of probe substrates and Imipenem by OAT1/3-HEK293 cells to different extents. Among them, rhein exhibited the strongest inhibition capacity with IC50 values of 0.08 ± 0.01 µM (OAT1) and 2.86 ± 0.28 µM (OAT3). Moreover, coadministration of rhein also significantly enhanced the antibacterial activity of Imipenem/Cilastatin in sepsis mice. CONCLUSION: Concomitant administration of Jinhongtang enhanced antibacterial activity of Imipenem/Cilastatin in sepsis mice induced by S. aureus through reducing renal elimination of Imipenem via inhibition of OATs. Our investigation provided the insight of Jinhongtang as an effective supplement to enhance the antibacterial activity of Imipenem/Cilastatin and can be useful for future clinical studies.


Subject(s)
Organic Anion Transporters , Sepsis , Humans , Rats , Animals , Mice , Herb-Drug Interactions , Cilastatin/pharmacokinetics , Cilastatin/therapeutic use , Staphylococcus aureus , HEK293 Cells , Cilastatin, Imipenem Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Imipenem/pharmacokinetics , Imipenem/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Sepsis/drug therapy , Drug Combinations
2.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 22(12): 1521-1531, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34120547

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are prevalent nosocomial infections with a worrisomely increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant causative organisms, including those with resistance to carbapenems. The addition of relebactam, a ß-lactamase inhibitor, to imipenem treatment restores the antimicrobial activity against the most of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, including some carrying ß-lactamase enzyme-type carbapenemases.Areas covered: The aim of this article is to summarize the current evidence regarding imipenem/relebactam for the treatment of HAP/VAP. The authors discuss its chemistry, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, microbiology, tolerance and clinical efficacy. The results of clinical trials have demonstrated an efficacy of imipenem/relebactam similar to that of its comparator for the treatment of patients with HAP/VAP. Different studies have also shown its good safety profile, which is better than that of the combination of other ß-lactams with other antibiotics.Expert opinion: This drug should be incorporated as a new therapeutic option for the treatment of patients with HAP/VAP, especially as an alternative treatment in patients with confirmed infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negatives.


Subject(s)
Pneumonia, Bacterial , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Azabicyclo Compounds/therapeutic use , Cilastatin , Hospitals , Humans , Imipenem/therapeutic use , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Pneumonia, Bacterial/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Ventilators, Mechanical
3.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 21(15): 1805-1811, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32820669

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The addition of the ß-lactamase inhibitor relebactam to imipenem restores the antibacterial activity against the majority of multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) are predominantly caused by Gram-negative uropathogens. The rise in antibiotic resistance, including to carbapenems, is an increasing challenge in daily practice. AREAS COVERED: In the current review, the use of imipenem/relebactam in complicated UTI is evaluated by discussing its chemistry, pharmacokinetics/dynamics, microbiology, safety, and clinical efficacy. The authors also provide their expert perspectives onto its use and its future place in the treatment armamentarium. EXPERT OPINION: With respect to complicated UTI, it should be noted that, to our knowledge, there are no data yet upon the clinical efficacy of imipenem/relebactam in patients with severe urosepsis or men with suspected prostatitis. Further studies upon these specific groups of UTI patients are needed including additional pharmacokinetic studies upon its tissue penetration of the prostate which is currently unknown. However, in our opinion, imipenem/relebactam can be used in complicated UTI when other treatment options are limited.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Azabicyclo Compounds/therapeutic use , Cilastatin/therapeutic use , Imipenem/therapeutic use , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Azabicyclo Compounds/administration & dosage , Azabicyclo Compounds/pharmacokinetics , Cilastatin/administration & dosage , Cilastatin/pharmacokinetics , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/drug effects , Drug Therapy, Combination , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Humans , Imipenem/administration & dosage , Imipenem/pharmacokinetics , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology
4.
Pharmacotherapy ; 40(4): 343-356, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32060929

ABSTRACT

Imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam (IMI-REL) is a novel ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitor combination recently approved for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) and complicated intraabdominal infections (cIAIs). Relebactam is a ß-lactamase inhibitor with the ability to inhibit a broad spectrum of ß-lactamases such as class A and class C ß-lactamases, including carbapenemases. The addition of relebactam to imipenem restores imipenem activity against several imipenem-resistant bacteria, including Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clinical data demonstrate that IMI-REL is well tolerated and effective in the treatment of cUTIs and cIAIs due to imipenem-resistant bacteria. In a phase III trial comparing IMI-REL with imipenem plus colistin, favorable clinical response was achieved in 71% and 70% of patients, respectively. Available clinical and pharmacokinetic data support the approved dosage of a 30-minute infusion of imipenem 500 mg-cilastatin 500 mg-relebactam 250 mg every 6 hours, along with dosage adjustments based on renal function. In this review, we describe the chemistry, mechanism of action, spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and clinical efficacy, and safety and tolerability of this new agent. The approval of IMI-REL represents another important step in the ongoing fight against multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/drug effects , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Azabicyclo Compounds/administration & dosage , Azabicyclo Compounds/pharmacology , Azabicyclo Compounds/therapeutic use , Cilastatin/administration & dosage , Cilastatin/pharmacology , Cilastatin/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Humans , Imipenem/administration & dosage , Imipenem/pharmacology , Imipenem/therapeutic use , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
5.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29866878

ABSTRACT

The World Health Organization has identified antimicrobial resistance as a global public health threat since the prevalence and spread of antibiotic resistance among bacterial pathogens worldwide are staggering. Carbapenems, such as imipenem and meropenem, have been used to treat multidrug-resistant bacteria; however, since the development of resistance to carbapenems, ß-lactam antibiotics in combination with ß-lactamase inhibitors (BLI) has been one of the most successful strategies to enhance the activity of ß-lactam antibiotics. Relebactam (REL) is a new BLI which has been found to inhibit class A and class C ß-lactamases in vitro REL has been reported to restore imipenem's activity against both imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae Reported here are the in vivo efficacy studies of the imipenem-cilastatin (IMI)-REL combination in mouse models of disseminated and pulmonary infection caused by imipenem-resistant clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae The combination was also evaluated in a P. aeruginosa delayed pulmonary model of infection. IMI-REL was found to be effective in the disseminated model of infection with log reduction in P. aeruginosa CFU of 3.73, 3.13, and 1.72 at REL doses of 40, 20, and 10 mg/kg, respectively. For K. pneumoniae, log reductions in CFU of 2.36, 3.06, and 2.29 were reported at REL doses of 80, 40, and 20 mg/kg, respectively. The combination was less effective in the delayed pulmonary model than in the immediate pulmonary model; however, overall REL was found to be effective against these imipenem-resistant strains.


Subject(s)
Azabicyclo Compounds/therapeutic use , Cilastatin, Imipenem Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Animals , Cilastatin/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Female , Imipenem/therapeutic use , Mice , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/pathogenicity , beta-Lactamase Inhibitors/therapeutic use
6.
J Chemother ; 30(4): 224-232, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29565228

ABSTRACT

The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to compare the effects of tigecycline and imipenem-cilastatin on fibrinogen levels in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Patients were empirically randomized to receive tigecycline or imipenem-cilastatin. Fibrinogen levels were measured in both patient groups on days 1, 3, 5 and 8 of antibiotic therapy and 3 days after antibiotic therapy completion. Twenty patients received tigecycline and 22 patients received imipenem-cilastatin . Patients in the tigecycline group had lower mean fibrinogen levels compared to those in the imipenem-cilastatin group on day 3 (4.1 ± 1.2 vs. 5.9 ± 1.3 g/L; p < 0.001), day 5 (3.7 ± 1.2 vs. 6.5 ± 1.1 g/L; p < 0.001), day 8 (3.5 ± 1.3 vs. 5.8 ± 1.6 g/L; p < 0.001), and day 3 after antibiotic completion (4.1 ± 1.4 vs. 6.1 ± 1.6 g/L; p < 0.001). In conclusion, compared to imipenem-cilastatin, tigecycline was associated with a significant decrease in fibrinogen levels, following CRS and HIPEC.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cilastatin/therapeutic use , Fibrinogen/metabolism , Imipenem/therapeutic use , Peritoneal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Tigecycline/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures , Drug Therapy, Combination , Humans , Hyperthermia, Induced , Male , Middle Aged , Peritoneal Neoplasms/surgery , Treatment Outcome
7.
J Glob Antimicrob Resist ; 13: 261-263, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29432939

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Carbapenem minimum inhibitory concentration (MICs) are known to predict outcomes for patients with Gram-negative bacteraemia. However, limited data exist on how MICs influence such outcomes when organisms are classified as carbapenem-resistant. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of increasing imipenem/cilastatin MICs on mortality in patients with Gram-negative bloodstream infection (BSI). METHODS: Patients with an imipenem/cilastatin-resistant (MIC>4mg/L) monomicrobial Gram-negative BSI were eligible for inclusion in the study and were assessed for baseline characteristics, organ function, microbiological data, timing and type of therapeutic treatment, and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients with imipenem/cilastatin-resistant bacterial isolates (MIC>4mg/L) were retrospectively studied. Time to event analyses found no difference between patients who received carbapenem therapy and those who did not (P=0.10). After adjustment, patients receiving directed therapy were less likely to die (adjusted hazard ratio=0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.83; P<0.01), whereas higher modified Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and days to positive culture were associated with non-survival. CONCLUSION: This study did not demonstrate a relationship between receipt of a carbapenem and mortality in patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative BSI.


Subject(s)
Cilastatin/therapeutic use , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/mortality , Imipenem/therapeutic use , Aged , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/mortality , Cilastatin/blood , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Female , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/blood , Humans , Imipenem/blood , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
9.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 32(10): 1645-1655, 2017 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28340076

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin is a potent chemotherapeutic drug whose nephrotoxic effect is a major complication and a dose-limiting factor for antitumoral therapy. There is much evidence that inflammation contributes to the pathogenesis of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. We found that cilastatin, a renal dehydropeptidase-I inhibitor, has protective effects in vitro and in vivo against cisplatin-induced renal damage by inhibiting apoptosis and oxidation. Here, we investigated the potential use of cilastatin to protect against cisplatin-induced kidney injury and inflammation in rats. METHODS: Male Wistar rats were divided into four groups: control, cilastatin-control, cisplatin and cilastatin-cisplatin. Nephrotoxicity was assessed 5 days after administration of cisplatin based on blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), kidney injury molecule (KIM)-1 and renal morphology. Inflammation was measured using the electrophoretic mobility shift assay, immunohistochemical studies and evaluation of inflammatory mediators. RESULTS: Compared with the control rats, cisplatin-administered rats were affected by significant proximal tubule damage, decreased GFR, increased production of inflammatory mediators and elevations in urea, creatinine and tissue KIM-1 levels. Cilastatin prevented these changes in renal function and ameliorated histological damage in cisplatin-administered animals. Cilastatin also reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine levels, activation of nuclear factor-κB and CD68-positive cell concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Cilastatin reduces cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity, which is associated with decreased inflammation in vivo. Although the exact role of decreased inflammation in nephroprotection has not been fully elucidated, treatment with cilastatin could be a novel strategy for the prevention of cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/toxicity , Cilastatin/pharmacology , Cisplatin/toxicity , Nephritis/prevention & control , Protease Inhibitors/pharmacology , Acute Kidney Injury/pathology , Animals , Apoptosis/drug effects , Blood Urea Nitrogen , Cilastatin/therapeutic use , Creatinine/blood , Cytokines/blood , Cytokines/urine , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Glomerular Filtration Rate/drug effects , Kidney Tubules, Proximal/drug effects , Kidney Tubules, Proximal/pathology , Male , NF-kappa B/metabolism , Nephritis/chemically induced , Nephritis/metabolism , Protease Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Rats , Rats, Wistar
11.
Transplant Proc ; 48(5): 1576-9, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27496450

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Klebsiella pneumoniae New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase-1 (NDM-1) strains have recently become a new threat in kidney transplant recipients due to the strains' resistance to almost all antibiotics, including carbapenems. METHODS: We present a case series of 3 patients with urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by multiresistant K pneumoniae NDM-1 strains who were treated with the same protocol. Genotyping sequencing with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was performed in all cases. RESULTS: All patients were male and had undergone kidney transplantation 4, 7, and 8 months, respectively, before the admission. Combined antibiotic therapy consisting of imipenem/cilastatin in maximal doses, gentamicin and/or colistin for 21 to 27 days, followed by oral fosfomycin, was used in all cases. There were no further UTI episodes in 2 patients at the 12-month visit. Three months after initial treatment, the third patient presented with leukocyturia with no clinical symptoms and a urine culture positive for K pneumonia NDM-1 strain. Interestingly, the strain was susceptible to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole despite resistance in previous urine culture samples. The patient was successfully treated with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 2 × 960 mg/d for 3 weeks followed by 480 mg/d and 3 doses of fosfomycin. Genotyping sequencing revealed identical DNA restriction fragments in bacterial strains from 2 patients. In the third case, although a difference in 2 restriction fragments was observed, the strain was considered related to the others. CONCLUSIONS: In cases of UTI caused by K pneumoniae NDM-1 strains, prolong combined treatment followed by oral fosfomycin prophylaxis can be successful. Strain genotyping should be performed to optimize further treatment protocols in such cases.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Kidney Transplantation , Klebsiella Infections/drug therapy , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Cilastatin/therapeutic use , Cilastatin, Imipenem Drug Combination , Colistin/therapeutic use , Drug Combinations , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Fosfomycin/therapeutic use , Genotype , Gentamicins/therapeutic use , Humans , Imipenem/therapeutic use , Klebsiella Infections/genetics , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genetics , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Transplant Recipients , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology , beta-Lactamases/biosynthesis
12.
Kansenshogaku Zasshi ; 90(3): 297-304, 2016 May.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27529964

ABSTRACT

There have been few coherent reports on extraintestinal infection or bacteremia caused by Campylobacter jejuni (C. jejuni) or C. coli in Japan. To clarify the clinical and microbiological characteristics of invasive infections caused by these two species, we retrospectively analyzed the records of patients from whom these pathogens had been isolated from sterile sites between 2000 and 2015. During this study period, we identified 9 patients. The clinical syndrome of all of these patients was bacteremia. Three patients had underlying diseases with both liver cirrhosis and malignant neoplasm, and all of these patients were aged 60 years or older. The remaining 6 patients were immunocompetent and younger than 40 years of age. All 9 patients had a fever of 38.5 degrees C or higher. The proportion of patients with gastrointestinal symptoms was lower for the 3 patients with underlying diseases, compared with the 6 patients without underlying diseases (1/3 cases vs, 4/6 cases). Of the 8 strains evaluated for antimicrobial susceptibility, all were susceptible to imipenem/cilastatin, kanamycin and erythromycin, and 2 were resistant to levofloxacin. Antimicrobial treatment was administered to 8 patients, but one spontaneously recovered without any treatment. We were able to follow the outcomes of 8 patients, and all of these patients completely recovered without relapses. We also reviewed 14 Japanese patients reported in the Japanese and English literature and found similar clinical features consisting of a high-grade fever and an association with underlying diseases and gastrointestinal symptoms. Of note, 3 agammaglobulinemic patients presented with bacteremia and extraintestinal infections and had multiple relapses. Based on the findings of our 9 cases and previous reports, the affected patients were divided into two groups according to clinical syndrome and therapeutic intervention. One group consisted of previously healthy children or young adults showing bacteremia. Most of them had enterocolitis complications but had a good prognosis. The other group consisted of patients with underlying diseases or elderly patients who presented with bacteremia alone or bacteremia with extraintestinal infections. The latter group, especially among those with humoral immunodeficiency, should be parentally treated with antimicrobial agents and requires careful monitoring for relapse. This is the largest case series study to examine invasive C. jejuni/coli infections in Japan, and it provides important epidemiological information on this rare infection.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/microbiology , Campylobacter Infections/drug therapy , Campylobacter jejuni/isolation & purification , Cilastatin/therapeutic use , Imipenem/therapeutic use , Adult , Campylobacter Infections/diagnosis , Child , Child, Preschool , Cilastatin, Imipenem Drug Combination , Drug Combinations , Female , Humans , Japan , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Middle Aged , Young Adult
13.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect ; 49(6): 955-961, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26350122

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. massiliense (a subspecies of the M. abscessus complex) is a rare causative agent of surgical site infection after cesarean section (C section). We tried to seek the common source of infection and unravel the optimal treatment modalities. METHODS: From September 2009 to October 2012, four postpartum women developed C-section wound infections caused by M. massiliense. Speciation of the four isolates was identified using of hsp65, rpoB, and secA1 partial gene sequencing and the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. The erm(41) and rrl genes were detected for the possibility of inducible macrolide resistance. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was used as a tool of molecular epidemiology. All patients underwent intensive intravenous and oral antimycobacterial regimens. Of these patients, three underwent debridement at least once. RESULTS: All four isolates were identified as M. abscessus subsp. massiliense. All of the isolates harbored a truncated erm(41) gene without rrl gene mutations, which explains the susceptibility to clarithromycin and azithromycin. Three isolates were indistinguishable by DNA strain typing, and the fourth strain was clonal with the other three strains. Their infections were not improved in spite of teicoplanin treatment initially. These patients underwent antimycobacterial regimens with/without surgery and were all cured. DISCUSSION: Teicoplanin treatment failure, painful cutaneous nodules, and persistent wound drainage alerted us to the possibility of nontuberculous mycobacterial skin and soft tissue infection. Accurate identification of subspecies, detection of drug resistance genes, susceptibility testing, and optimal antimycobacterial agents with/without surgical debridement are warranted for successful treatment.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Mycobacterium Infections/drug therapy , Nontuberculous Mycobacteria/drug effects , Nontuberculous Mycobacteria/isolation & purification , Surgical Wound Infection/drug therapy , Adult , Azithromycin/therapeutic use , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Chaperonin 60/genetics , Cilastatin/therapeutic use , Cilastatin, Imipenem Drug Combination , Clarithromycin/therapeutic use , Drug Combinations , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Female , Fluoroquinolones/therapeutic use , Humans , Imipenem/therapeutic use , Methyltransferases/genetics , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Molecular Typing , Moxifloxacin , Mycobacterium Infections/microbiology , Nontuberculous Mycobacteria/genetics , Pregnancy , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Teicoplanin/therapeutic use
14.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect ; 49(6): 924-933, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26341302

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: To compare the clinical efficacy between salvage antimicrobial regimen consisting of tigecycline plus extended-infusion imipenem/cilastatin (TIC) and regimen of sulbactam plus imipenem/cilastatin (SIC) for patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia and pneumonic bacteremia due to extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Acinetobacter baumannii (Ab) isolates, and determine the correlation of results of in vitro tigecycline-imipenem synergy test with clinical efficacy. METHODS: The comparative survey was conducted at a medical center in Taiwan in 2013. Patients comprising the TIC group (n = 28) received tigecycline plus extended-infusion imipenem/cilastatin following unresponsiveness to 3-day sulbactam-imipenem/cilastatin therapy, and those in the SIC group (n = 56) received sulbactam-imipenem/cilastatin throughout the course. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to explore 30-day case-fatality independent predictors. Additionally, the checkerboard test and time-kill analysis were performed for the bloodstream XDR-Ab isolates from patients in the TIC group, and molecular characterization was done for the bloodstream XDR-Ab strains of all patients. RESULTS: We found that the TIC scheme has a significant benefit on improving patients' survival status (the mortality rate of TIC and SIC group patients was 14.3% and 64.3%, respectively), corresponding well with in vitro synergy or additivity results by the checkerboard test. Twenty TIC group cases had monomicrobial XDR-Ab cultured from tracheal aspirates after 10 days of tigecycline-imipenem/cilastatin therapy, but none developed subsequent pneumonia. However, breakthrough primary Burkholderia cepacia (n = 3) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 1) bacteremias were attributed to four TIC case fatalities. Shock, SIC regimen usage, and development of breakthrough bacteremia were independent predictors of 30-day in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: Although the TIC regimen showed good efficacy, its value regarding managing XDR-Ab ventilator-associated pneumonia bacteremia needs further evaluation.


Subject(s)
Acinetobacter Infections/drug therapy , Acinetobacter baumannii/drug effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Cilastatin/therapeutic use , Imipenem/therapeutic use , Minocycline/analogs & derivatives , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Sulbactam/therapeutic use , Acinetobacter baumannii/isolation & purification , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bacteremia/microbiology , Cilastatin, Imipenem Drug Combination , Drug Combinations , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Drug Synergism , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Minocycline/therapeutic use , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Salvage Therapy , Taiwan , Tigecycline , Treatment Outcome
15.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 58(2): 1005-18, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24277034

ABSTRACT

Several studies with animal models have demonstrated that bioequivalence of generic products of antibiotics like vancomycin, as currently defined, do not guarantee therapeutic equivalence. However, the amounts and characteristics of impurities and degradation products in these formulations do not violate the requirements of the U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP). Here, we provide experimental data with three generic products of meropenem that help in understanding how these apparently insignificant chemical differences affect the in vivo efficacy. Meropenem generics were compared with the innovator in vitro by microbiological assay, susceptibility testing, and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) analysis and in vivo with the neutropenic guinea pig soleus infection model (Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and the neutropenic mouse thigh (P. aeruginosa), brain (P. aeruginosa), and lung (Klebisella pneumoniae) infection models, adding the dihydropeptidase I (DHP-I) inhibitor cilastatin in different proportions to the carbapenem. We found that the concentration and potency of the active pharmaceutical ingredient, in vitro susceptibility testing, and mouse pharmacokinetics were identical for all products; however, two generics differed significantly from the innovator in the guinea pig and mouse models, while the third generic was therapeutically equivalent under all conditions. Trisodium adducts in a bioequivalent generic made it more susceptible to DHP-I hydrolysis and less stable at room temperature, explaining its therapeutic nonequivalence. We conclude that the therapeutic nonequivalence of generic products of meropenem is due to greater susceptibility to DHP-I hydrolysis. These failing generics are compliant with USP requirements and would remain undetectable under current regulations.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Dipeptidases/metabolism , Drugs, Generic/pharmacokinetics , Klebsiella Infections/drug therapy , Pseudomonas Infections/drug therapy , Thienamycins/pharmacokinetics , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/metabolism , Biotransformation , Brain/drug effects , Brain/microbiology , Cilastatin/pharmacology , Dipeptidases/antagonists & inhibitors , Drug Stability , Drugs, Generic/metabolism , GPI-Linked Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , GPI-Linked Proteins/metabolism , Guinea Pigs , Klebsiella Infections/microbiology , Klebsiella pneumoniae/drug effects , Klebsiella pneumoniae/physiology , Lung/drug effects , Lung/microbiology , Meropenem , Mice , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Muscle, Skeletal/drug effects , Muscle, Skeletal/microbiology , Protease Inhibitors/pharmacology , Pseudomonas Infections/microbiology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/physiology , Therapeutic Equivalency , Thienamycins/metabolism , Thigh/microbiology , Treatment Outcome
17.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 11(5): 427-32, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20818984

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Early, empiric, broad-spectrum antibiotics followed by de-escalation to pathogen-specific therapy is the standard of care for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). In our surgical intensive care unit (SICU), imipenem-cilastatin (I-C) in combination with tobramycin (TOB) or levofloxacin (LEV) has been used until quantitative bronchoalveolar lavage results are finalized, at which time de-escalation occurs to pathogen-specific agents. With this practice, however, alterations in antimicrobial resistance remain a concern. Our hypothesis was that this strict regimen does not alter antimicrobial susceptibility of common gram-negative VAP pathogens in our SICU. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective review of SICU-specific antibiograms was performed for the sensitivities of common gram-negative VAP pathogens. Time periods were defined as early (January-June 2005) and late (July-December 2006). Chart review of empiric and de-escalation antibiotic usage was obtained. Data were collated, and statistical significance was assessed with the chi-square test using the on-line Simple Interactive Statistical Analysis tool. RESULTS: Imipenem-cilastatin was used 198 times for empiric VAP coverage (811 patient-days), whereas TOB and LEV were given a total of 149 (564 patient-days) and 61 (320 patient-days) times, respectively. Collectively, the susceptibility of gram-negative organisms to I-C did not change (early 91.4%; late 97%; p = 0.33). Individually, non-significant trends to greater sensitivity to I-C were noted for both Pseudomonas aeruginosa (early 85.7%; late 90.9%; p = 0.73) and Acinetobacter baumannii (early 80%; late 100%; p = 0.13). Further, both TOB (early 77.1%; late 70.0%; p = 0.49) and LEV (early 74.3%; late 70.0%; p = 0.67) were found to maintain their susceptibility profiles. The frequency of resistant gram-positive VAPs was unchanged during the study period. Our de-escalation compliance (by 96 h) was 78% for I-C, 77.2% for TOB, and 59% for LEV. When infections requiring I-C were removed from the analysis, de-escalation compliance was improved to 92%. CONCLUSIONS: In our SICU, early, empiric broad-spectrum VAP therapy followed by de-escalation to pathogen-specific agents did not alter antimicrobial resistance and is a valid practice. Further, our compliance with de-escalation practices was higher than published rates.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Cilastatin/therapeutic use , Cilastatin, Imipenem Drug Combination , Drug Combinations , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Humans , Imipenem/therapeutic use , Levofloxacin , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Ofloxacin/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Tobramycin/therapeutic use
18.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 68(2): 140-51, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20846586

ABSTRACT

To compare efficacy and safety of a tigecycline regimen with an imipenem/cilastatin regimen in hospital-acquired pneumonia patients, a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, study evaluated 945 patients. Coprimary end points were clinical response in clinically evaluable (CE) and clinical modified intent-to-treat (c-mITT) populations at test-of-cure. Cure rates were 67.9% for tigecycline and 78.2% for imipenem (CE patients) and 62.7% and 67.6% (c-mITT patients), respectively. A statistical interaction occurred between ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and non-VAP subgroups, with significantly lower cure rates in tigecycline VAP patients compared to imipenem; in non-VAP patients, tigecycline was noninferior to imipenem. Overall mortality did not differ between the tigecycline (14.1%) and imipenem regimens (12.2%), although more deaths occurred in VAP patients treated with tigecycline than imipenem. Overall, the tigecycline regimen was noninferior to the imipenem/cilastatin regimen for the c-mITT but not the CE population; this difference appears to have been driven by results in VAP patients.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cilastatin/therapeutic use , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Imipenem/therapeutic use , Minocycline/analogs & derivatives , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Cilastatin/adverse effects , Cilastatin/pharmacokinetics , Cilastatin/pharmacology , Cilastatin, Imipenem Drug Combination , Cross Infection/mortality , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Imipenem/adverse effects , Imipenem/pharmacokinetics , Imipenem/pharmacology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Minocycline/adverse effects , Minocycline/pharmacokinetics , Minocycline/pharmacology , Minocycline/therapeutic use , Pneumonia/mortality , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/mortality , Tigecycline , Treatment Outcome
19.
Jpn J Antibiot ; 62(3): 241-52, 2009 Jun.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19882983

ABSTRACT

Tebipenem pivoxil (TBPM-PI), the first oral carbapenem antibiotic both in Japan and abroad, was examined on its convulsive liability. We used ICR male mice and Sprague-Dawley male rats to examine the pro-convulsive effect and anticonvulsive effect of TBPM-PI and its active metabolite, TBPM. (1) When mice were treated with TBPM-PI (30-1000 mg/kg, p.o.) or TBPM (10-300 mg/kg, i.v.), no convulsion was noted at any dose level. When rats were treated with TBPM (300 mg/kg, i.v.), no convulsant effects were noted in electroencephalography or behavioral observation. In intraventricular injection of TBPM in mice, clonic convulsion was observed in 7/10 animals at 100 microg but no effect at 30 microg. On the other hand, the administration of 10/10 microg imipenem/cilastatin (IPM/CS) resulted in clonic convulsion in all animals and tonic convulsion in 3/10 animals, and 4/10 animals died. The administration of 100 microg meropenem did not cause any effects. (2) When mice were co-administered with pentylenetetrazole (45 mg/kg: maximum dose level at which no convulsion is induced) and TBPM-PI (30-300 mg/kg, p.o.) or TBPM (300 mg/kg, i.v.), convulsion enhancing effect was not noted. On the other hand, the co-administration of pentylenetetrazole with IPM/CS (300/300 mg/kg, i.v.) enhanced a convulsive effect of pentylenetetrazole. (3) When mice were treated with TBPM-PI (30-300 mg/kg, p.o.) or TBPM (100 mg/kg, i.v.), inhibitory effect was not noted on convulsions induced by electrostimulation, pentylenetetrazole or strychinine. In conclusion, there were no pro-convulsive effects or anticonvulsive effect in the oral administration of TBPM-PI or intravenous administration of TBPM. Pro-convulsive effect was observed in the intraventricular injection of TBPM as in the case of other carbapenem antibiotics, but such action was weaker than that in IPM/CS administration. Accordingly, the risk of occurrence of convulsion related to TBPM-PI administration was low compared to IPM/CS administration, and TBPM-PI was considered to be less potential to induce convulsions in clinical use.


Subject(s)
Carbapenems/adverse effects , Seizures/chemically induced , Administration, Oral , Animals , Carbapenems/administration & dosage , Cilastatin/administration & dosage , Cilastatin/adverse effects , Cilastatin, Imipenem Drug Combination , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Combinations , Drug Synergism , Imipenem/administration & dosage , Imipenem/adverse effects , Infusions, Intravenous , Injections, Intraventricular , Male , Mice , Pentylenetetrazole/adverse effects , Pentylenetetrazole/pharmacology , Rats
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL