Systematic review and meta-analysis of traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.

AIM: This meta-analysis analyzed the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C). METHODS: We searched seven electronic databases for randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy of TCM in the treatment of IBS-C. The search period was from inception to June 1, 2017. Eligible RCTs compared TCM with cisapride and mosapride. Article quality was evaluated with the Cochrane Risk Bias Tool in the Cochrane Handbook by two independent reviewers. Begg's test was performed to evaluate publication bias. Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 12.0 were used for analyses. RESULTS: Eleven eligible studies comprising a total of 906 participants were identified. In the primary outcome, TCM showed significant improvement in overall clinical efficacy compared with cisapride and mosapride (odds ratio [OR] = 4.00; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.74,5.84; P < 0.00001). In terms of secondary outcomes, TCM significantly alleviated abdominal pain (OR = 5.69; 95% CI: 2.35, 13.78; P = 0.0001), defecation frequency (OR = 4.38; 95% CI: 1.93, 9.93. P = 0.0004), and stool form (OR = 4.96; 95% CI: 2.11, 11.65; P = 0.0002) in the treatment group as compared to the control group. A lower recurrence rate was associated with TCM as compared to cisapride and mosapride (OR = 0.15; 95% CI: 0.08, 0.27; P < 0.00001). No adverse effects were observed during TCM treatment. CONCLUSIONS: TCM showed greater improvement in terms of clinical efficacy in the treatment of IBS-C than cisapride and mosapride, although it was not possible to draw a definitive conclusion due to the small sample size, high risk, and low quality of the studies. Large multi-center and long-term high-quality randomized control trials are needed.

Comparison of the QT interval response during sinus and paced rhythm in conscious and anesthetized beagle dogs.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to compare sensitivity in detecting the drug-induced QT interval prolongation in three dog models: conscious telemetered at sinus rhythm and conscious and anesthetized dogs during atrial pacing. The test substances used represent different chemical classes with different pharmacological and pharmacokinetic profiles. METHOD: Dofetilide and moxifloxacin were tested in all models, whereas cisapride and terfenadine were tested in the conscious telemetered and paced models. All substances were given as two consecutive 1.5-h intravenous infusions (infusions 1 and 2). The individual concentration-time courses of dofetilide, moxifloxacin, and cisapride were linked to the drug-induced effects on the QT interval and described with a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model to obtain an estimate of the unbound plasma concentrations at steady state that give a 10- and 20-ms drug-induced QT interval prolongation (CE10ms and CE20ms). RESULTS: In the conscious telemetered, conscious paced, and anesthetized dog models, the mean CE10ms values were 1.4, 4.0, and 2.5 nM for dofetilide and 1300, 1800, and 12,200 nM for moxifloxacin. For cisapride, the CE10ms values were 8.0 and 4.4 nM in the conscious telemetered and conscious paced dog models. The drug-induced QT interval prolongation during the last 30 min of infusions 1 and 2 was comparable in the conscious models, but smaller in the anesthetized dog model. Terfenadine displayed a marked delay in onset of response, which could only be detected by the extended ECG recording. DISCUSSION: All dog models investigated detected QT interval prolongation after administration of the investigated test substances with similar sensitivity, except for a lower sensitivity in the anesthetized dogs following moxifloxacin administration. The conscious telemetered dog model was favorable, mainly due to the extended continuous ECG recording, which facilitated detection and quantification of delayed temporal differences between systemic exposure and drug-induced QT interval prolongation.

Evaluation of the guinea pig monophasic action potential (MAP) assay in predicting drug-induced delay of ventricular repolarisation using 12 clinically documented drugs.

INTRODUCTION: While the dog in vivo model is commonly employed in the later phase of discovery for assessing drug-induced QT prolongation, an early screening assay is valuable when selecting compounds for further development and when compound availability usually is low. One such screening assay is the anaesthetised guinea pig monophasic action potential (MAP) model. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the ability of this model to detect proarrhythmic properties by testing a set of reference compounds with known clinical profile. Moreover, these results were compared to data previously obtained using in vivo canine QT assays (QT PRODACT study). METHODS: Anaesthetised and ventilated male guinea pigs were vagotomised and pretreated with propranolol. After thoracotomy, a pacing electrode was clipped to the left atrial appendage and a suction MAP electrode positioned on the left ventricular epicardium. The drug or corresponding vehicle was injected intravenously in cumulative doses and MAP duration at 90% repolarisation (MAPD90) was recorded during cardiac pacing. RESULTS: The 8 drugs known to be proarrhythmic in the clinic all displayed dose-dependent prolongation of MAPD90, while the 4 drugs devoid of dysrhythmia in man had no effect. When comparing doses producing a 10% MAPD90 increase with doses reported to increase QTc by 10% in dogs a strong correlation was seen (R(2) 0.94 and 0.58 for anaesthetised and conscious dogs, respectively). DISCUSSION: The guinea pig MAP assay identified all clinically positive drugs while negative drugs were without effect on ventricular repolarisation. Furthermore, a good concurrence is shown between the guinea pig and dog models in identifying compounds with proarrhythmic properties. Overall, the study reinforces the anaesthetised guinea pig MAP model as a reliable assay predicting QT liability of new chemical entities and as a highly sensitive early screening model for cardiovascular risk.

The role of cisapride in the treatment of pediatric gastroesophageal reflux. The European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition.

BACKGROUND: Cisapride is a gastrointestinal prokinetic agent that is used worldwide in the treatment of gastrointestinal motility-related disorders in premature infants, full-term infants, and children. Efficacy data suggest that it is the most effective commercially available prokinetic drug. METHODS: Because of recent concerns about safety, a critical and in-depth analysis of all reported adverse events was performed and resulted in the conclusions and recommendations that follow. RESULTS: Cisapride should only be administered to patients in whom the use of prokinetics is justified according to current medical knowledge. If cisapride is given to pediatric patients who can be considered healthy except for their gastrointestinal motility disorder, and the maximum dose does not exceed 0.8 mg/kg per day in 3 to 4 administrations of 0.2 mg/kg (not exceeding 40 mg/d), no special safety procedures regarding potential cardiac adverse events are recommended. However, if cisapride is prescribed for patients who are known to be or are suspected of being at increased risk for drug-associated increases in QTc interval, certain precautions are advisable. Such patients include those:(1) with a previous history of cardiac dysrhythmias, (2) receiving drugs known to inhibit the metabolism of cisapride and/or adversely affect ventricular repolarisation, (3) with immaturity and/or disease causing reduced cytochrome P450 3A4 activity, or (4) with electrolyte disturbances. In such patients, ECG monitoring to quantitate the QTc interval should be used before initiation of therapy and after 3 days of treatment to ascertain whether a cisapride-induced cardiac adverse effect is present. CONCLUSIONS: With rare exceptions, the total daily dose of cisapride should not exceed 0.8 mg/kg divided into 3 or 4 approximately equally spaced doses. If higher doses than this are given, the precautions above are advisable. In any patient in whom a prolonged QTc interval is found, the dose of cisapride should be reduced or the drug discontinued until the ECG normalizes. If the QTc interval returns to normal after withdrawal of cisapride, and the administration of cisapride is considered to be justified because of its efficacy and absence of alternative treatment options, cisapride can be restarted at half dose with control of the QTc interval. Unfortunately, at present, normal ranges of QTc interval in children are unknown. However, a critical analysis of the literature suggests that a duration of less than 450 milliseconds can be considered to be within the normal range and greater than 470 milliseconds as outside it.