Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 367
Filter
Add more filters

Complementary Medicines
Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 17(2): e0263516, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35134072

ABSTRACT

The ability to determine a sound's location is critical in everyday life. However, sound source localization is severely compromised for patients with hearing loss who receive bilateral cochlear implants (BiCIs). Several patient factors relate to poorer performance in listeners with BiCIs, associated with auditory deprivation, experience, and age. Critically, characteristic errors are made by patients with BiCIs (e.g., medial responses at lateral target locations), and the relationship between patient factors and the type of errors made by patients has seldom been investigated across individuals. In the present study, several different types of analysis were used to understand localization errors and their relationship with patient-dependent factors (selected based on their robustness of prediction). Binaural hearing experience is required for developing accurate localization skills, auditory deprivation is associated with degradation of the auditory periphery, and aging leads to poorer temporal resolution. Therefore, it was hypothesized that earlier onsets of deafness would be associated with poorer localization acuity and longer periods without BiCI stimulation or older age would lead to greater amounts of variability in localization responses. A novel machine learning approach was introduced to characterize the types of errors made by listeners with BiCIs, making them simple to interpret and generalizable to everyday experience. Sound localization performance was measured in 48 listeners with BiCIs using pink noise trains presented in free-field. Our results suggest that older age at testing and earlier onset of deafness are associated with greater average error, particularly for sound sources near the center of the head, consistent with previous research. The machine learning analysis revealed that variability of localization responses tended to be greater for individuals with earlier compared to later onsets of deafness. These results suggest that early bilateral hearing is essential for best sound source localization outcomes in listeners with BiCIs.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss, Bilateral/physiopathology , Sound Localization/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Adult , Age Factors , Age of Onset , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Auditory Perception/physiology , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Cues , Deafness/physiopathology , Female , Hearing/physiology , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Hearing Tests , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sound
2.
Neuroimage ; 230: 117816, 2021 04 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33524580

ABSTRACT

In early deaf individuals, the auditory deprived temporal brain regions become engaged in visual processing. In our study we tested further the hypothesis that intrinsic functional specialization guides the expression of cross-modal responses in the deprived auditory cortex. We used functional MRI to characterize the brain response to horizontal, radial and stochastic visual motion in early deaf and hearing individuals matched for the use of oral or sign language. Visual motion showed enhanced response in the 'deaf' mid-lateral planum temporale, a region selective to auditory motion as demonstrated by a separate auditory motion localizer in hearing people. Moreover, multivariate pattern analysis revealed that this reorganized temporal region showed enhanced decoding of motion categories in the deaf group, while visual motion-selective region hMT+/V5 showed reduced decoding when compared to hearing people. Dynamic Causal Modelling revealed that the 'deaf' motion-selective temporal region shows a specific increase of its functional interactions with hMT+/V5 and is now part of a large-scale visual motion selective network. In addition, we observed preferential responses to radial, compared to horizontal, visual motion in the 'deaf' right superior temporal cortex region that also show preferential response to approaching/receding sounds in the hearing brain. Overall, our results suggest that the early experience of auditory deprivation interacts with intrinsic constraints and triggers a large-scale reallocation of computational load between auditory and visual brain regions that typically support the multisensory processing of motion information.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Auditory Cortex/physiology , Deafness/physiopathology , Motion Perception/physiology , Photic Stimulation/methods , Sound Localization/physiology , Adult , Auditory Cortex/diagnostic imaging , Deafness/diagnostic imaging , Early Diagnosis , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male
3.
Audiol Neurootol ; 26(3): 173-181, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33498058

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Young children are able to explore new objects and practice language through the acquisition of motor skills that lead to their overall development. Congenital hearing loss and total vestibular loss may contribute to the delay in speech and motor skill development. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between motor development performance, speech perception, and language performance in children with auditory brainstem implant (ABI). METHOD: Ten children, aged 4-17 years (mean age 9.76 ± 4.03), fitted with unilateral ABI for at least 2 years due to the presence of labyrinthine aplasia and rudimentary otocyst at least 1 side were included in the study. Several standardized tests, such as Bruininks-Oseretsky Motor Proficiency Test-2 (BOT-2), Children's Auditory Perception Test Battery, Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS), and Test of Early Language Development-3, were performed to evaluate their skills of fine motor control, balance, manual dexterity, language, and auditory perception. RESULTS: A significant correlation was established between the BOT-2 manual dexterity and MAIS scores (r = 0.827, p < 0.05) and between the manual dexterity and language skills (for expressive language, r = 0.762, p < 0.05; for receptive language, r = 0.650, p < 0.05). Some of the BOT-2 balance tasks, such as standing on 1 leg on a line with eyes closed, standing on 1 leg on a balance beam with eyes open, standing heel-to-toe on a balance beam, and walking forward heel-to-toe on a line, showed a strong correlation with their receptive and expressive language performance (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The current study has indicated that significantly poor manual and balance performances are associated with poor speech perception and language skills in children with ABI. The authors recommend performing a vestibular assessment before and after ABI surgery and the use of a holistic rehabilitation approach, including auditory and vestibular rehabilitation, to support development of the children with ABI.


Subject(s)
Auditory Brain Stem Implants , Deafness/physiopathology , Language Development , Language , Motor Skills/physiology , Adolescent , Auditory Perception/physiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Deafness/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Postural Balance/physiology , Speech Perception/physiology , Treatment Outcome
4.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 132(1): 258-268, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33139199

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Long-term outcomes of early implanted, young adult cochlear implant (CI) users remain variable. We measured auditory discrimination by means of event-related potentials in this population to examine whether variability at the level of cortical auditory processing helps to explain speech abilities. METHODS: Using an auditory oddball paradigm, the P300 and Mismatch Negativity (MMN) were measured in 8 young adult CI users and 14 normal-hearing peers. We related P300 amplitude and latency to clinical speech perception scores in quiet and to duration of deafness. RESULTS: All individuals showed P300 responses. The MMN response was less robust in both groups. There was no evidence for differences in P300 responses between CI users and controls. P300 amplitude was associated with speech perception scores (r = 0.70, p = .05) and duration of deafness (r = -0.83, p = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Early CI implantation yields good auditory processing outcomes at young adult age and, in contrast to MMN, the P300 provides a robust measure for auditory processing on an individual level. SIGNIFICANCE: At the cortical level, early implanted, long-term CI users have good auditory discrimination, leaving variability in implantation outcomes unexplained. This group provides unique insight into the long-term neurophysiological underpinnings of early implantation.


Subject(s)
Auditory Cortex/physiopathology , Auditory Perception/physiology , Deafness/physiopathology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation , Adolescent , Adult , Cochlear Implants , Deafness/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Speech Perception/physiology , Young Adult
5.
Hum Brain Mapp ; 42(1): 233-244, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33022826

ABSTRACT

Long-term hearing loss in postlingually deaf (PD) adults may lead to brain structural changes that affect the outcomes of cochlear implantation. We studied 94 PD patients who underwent cochlear implantation and 37 patients who were MRI-scanned within 2 weeks after the onset of sudden hearing loss and expected with minimal brain structural changes in relation to deafness. Compared with those with sudden hearing loss, we found lower gray matter (GM) probabilities in bilateral thalami, superior, middle, inferior temporal cortices as well as the central cortical regions corresponding to the movement and sensation of the lips, tongue, and larynx in the PD group. Among these brain areas, the GM in the middle temporal cortex showed negative correlation with disease duration, whereas the other areas displayed positive correlations. Left superior, middle temporal cortical, and bilateral thalamic GMs were the most accurate predictors of post-cochlear implantation word recognition scores (mean absolute error [MAE] = 10.1, r = .82), which was superior to clinical variables used (MAE: 12.1, p < .05). Using the combined brain morphological and clinical features, we achieved the best prediction of the outcome (MAE: 8.51, r = .90). Our findings suggest that the cross-modal plasticity allowing the superior temporal cortex and thalamus to process other modal sensory inputs reverses the initially lower volume when deafness becomes persistent. The middle temporal cortex processing higher-level language comprehension shows persistent negative correlations with disease duration, suggesting this area's association with degraded speech comprehensions due to long-term deafness. Morphological features combined with clinical variables might play a key role in predicting outcomes of cochlear implantation.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Deafness/physiopathology , Deafness/rehabilitation , Gray Matter/anatomy & histology , Motor Cortex/anatomy & histology , Neuronal Plasticity/physiology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Somatosensory Cortex/anatomy & histology , Speech Perception/physiology , Temporal Lobe/anatomy & histology , Thalamus/anatomy & histology , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Deafness/diagnostic imaging , Female , Gray Matter/diagnostic imaging , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnostic imaging , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Sudden/diagnostic imaging , Hearing Loss, Sudden/physiopathology , Hearing Tests , Humans , Larynx/physiology , Lip/physiology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Motor Cortex/diagnostic imaging , Somatosensory Cortex/diagnostic imaging , Temporal Lobe/diagnostic imaging , Thalamus/diagnostic imaging , Time Factors , Tongue/physiology
6.
Audiol Neurootol ; 26(1): 17-26, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32721977

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have shown an advantage for electro-acoustic stimulation (EAS) in cochlear implant (CI) patients with residual hearing, but the degree of benefit can vary. The objective was to explore which factors relate to performance with and acceptance of EAS for CI users with conventional-length electrodes. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for adults with an average threshold of 75 dB hearing loss or better across 250 and 500 Hz preoperatively (n = 83). All patients underwent cochlear implantation with a conventional-length electrode. Low-frequency audiometric thresholds were measured at initial activation as well as 3 and 12 months postoperatively to determine who met the criteria for EAS. Speech perception for CNC words and AzBio sentences in quiet and +10 dB SNR noise was evaluated 3 and 12 months after activation. RESULTS: Speech perception in quiet and noise was similar regardless of whether or not the patient was eligible for EAS. Less than half of the patients who met the EAS criteria chose to use it, citing reasons such as physical discomfort or lack of perceived benefit. EAS users performed better on CNC words but not sentence recognition than EAS nonusers. CONCLUSIONS: EAS use is dependent on audiologic and nonaudiologic issues. Hearing preservation is possible with conventional electrodes, but hearing preservation alone does not guarantee superior speech perception.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Cochlear Implants , Deafness/rehabilitation , Electric Stimulation/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Audiometry , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Auditory Threshold , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Deafness/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Noise , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Patient Satisfaction , Retrospective Studies , Speech Perception , Young Adult
7.
PLoS One ; 15(10): e0240832, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33119665

ABSTRACT

Hypnosis is a powerful tool to affect the processing and perception of stimuli. Here, we investigated the effects of hypnosis on the processing of auditory stimuli, the time course of event-related-potentials (ERP; N1 and P3b amplitudes) and the activity of cortical sources of the P3b component. Forty-eight participants completed an auditory oddball paradigm composed of standard, distractor, and target stimuli during a hypnosis (HYP), a simulation of hypnosis (SIM), a distraction (DIS), and a control (CON) condition. During HYP, participants were suggested that an earplug would obstruct the perception of tones and during SIM they should pretend being hypnotized and obstructed to hear the tones. During DIS, participants' attention was withdrawn from the tones by focusing participants' attention onto a film. In each condition, subjects were asked to press a key whenever a target stimulus was presented. Behavioral data show that target hit rates and response time became significantly reduced during HYP and SIM and loudness ratings of tones were only reduced during HYP. Distraction from stimuli by the film was less effective in reducing target hit rate and tone loudness. Although, the N1 amplitude was not affected by the experimental conditions, the P3b amplitude was significantly reduced in HYP and SIM compared to CON and DIS. In addition, source localization results indicate that only a small number of neural sources organize the differences of tone processing between the control condition and the distraction, hypnosis, and simulation of hypnosis conditions. These sources belong to brain areas that control the focus of attention, the discrimination of auditory stimuli, and the organization of behavioral responses to targets. Our data confirm that deafness suggestions significantly change auditory processing and perception but complete deafness is hard to achieve during HYP. Therefore, the term 'deafness' may be misleading and should better be replaced by 'hypoacusis'.


Subject(s)
Brain/diagnostic imaging , Cognition/physiology , Deafness/physiopathology , Hypnosis/methods , Acoustic Stimulation , Adolescent , Adult , Attention/physiology , Auditory Perception , Behavior/physiology , Brain/physiology , Brain/physiopathology , Deafness/diagnostic imaging , Deafness/etiology , Electroencephalography/methods , Evoked Potentials/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Female , Hearing/physiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Speech Perception/physiology , Young Adult
8.
Neural Plast ; 2020: 4576729, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32774355

ABSTRACT

Music perception in cochlear implant (CI) users is far from satisfactory, not only because of the technological limitations of current CI devices but also due to the neurophysiological alterations that generally accompany deafness. Early behavioral studies revealed that similar mechanisms underlie musical and lexical pitch perception in CI-based electric hearing. Although neurophysiological studies of the musical pitch perception of English-speaking CI users are actively ongoing, little such research has been conducted with Mandarin-speaking CI users; as Mandarin is a tonal language, these individuals require pitch information to understand speech. The aim of this work was to study the neurophysiological mechanisms accounting for the musical pitch identification abilities of Mandarin-speaking CI users and normal-hearing (NH) listeners. Behavioral and mismatch negativity (MMN) data were analyzed to examine musical pitch processing performance. Moreover, neurophysiological results from CI users with good and bad pitch discrimination performance (according to the just-noticeable differences (JND) and pitch-direction discrimination (PDD) tasks) were compared to identify cortical responses associated with musical pitch perception differences. The MMN experiment was conducted using a passive oddball paradigm, with musical tone C4 (262 Hz) presented as the standard and tones D4 (294 Hz), E4 (330 Hz), G#4 (415 Hz), and C5 (523 Hz) presented as deviants. CI users demonstrated worse musical pitch discrimination ability than did NH listeners, as reflected by larger JND and PDD thresholds for pitch identification, and significantly increased latencies and reduced amplitudes in MMN responses. Good CI performers had better MMN results than did bad performers. Consistent with findings for English-speaking CI users, the results of this work suggest that MMN is a viable marker of cortical pitch perception in Mandarin-speaking CI users.


Subject(s)
Brain/physiology , Brain/physiopathology , Cochlear Implants , Deafness/physiopathology , Deafness/psychology , Music , Pitch Discrimination/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Electroencephalography , Female , Humans , Male , Psychoacoustics , Young Adult
9.
Hear Res ; 390: 107949, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32200300

ABSTRACT

Phantom electrode (PE) stimulation can extend the lower limit of pitch perception with cochlear implants (CIs) by using simultaneous out-of-phase stimulation of the most apical primary electrode and the adjacent basal compensating electrode. The total electrical field may push the excitation pattern beyond the most apical electrode to elicit a lower pitch, depending on the ratio of current between the compensating and primary electrodes (i.e., the compensation coefficient σ). This study tested the hypothesis that dynamic current steering of PE stimuli can be implemented by varying σ over time to encode spectral details in low frequencies. To determine the range of σ for current steering and the corresponding current levels, Experiment 1 tested CI users' loudness balance and pitch ranking of static PE stimuli with σ from 0 to 0.6 in steps of 0.2. It was found that the equal-loudness most comfortable level significantly increased with σ and can be modeled by a piecewise linear function of σ. Consistent with the previous findings, higher σ elicited either lower or similar pitches without salient pitch reversals than lower σ. Based on the results of Experiment 1, Experiment 2 created flat, rising, and falling pitch contours of 300-1000 ms using dynamic PE stimuli with time-varying σ from 0 to 0.6 and equal-loudness current levels. In a pitch contour identification (PCI) task, CI users scored 80% and above on average. Increasing the stimulus duration from 300 to 1000 ms slightly but did not significantly improve the PCI scores. Across subjects, the 1000-ms PCI scores in Experiment 2 were significantly correlated with the cumulative pitch-ranking sensitivity in Experiment 1. It is thus feasible to use dynamic current steering with PE to encode low-frequency pitch cues for CI users.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Cochlear Implants , Cues , Deafness/rehabilitation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Pitch Perception , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Aged , Deafness/diagnosis , Deafness/physiopathology , Deafness/psychology , Electric Stimulation , Female , Hearing , Humans , Loudness Perception , Male , Middle Aged , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Pitch Discrimination
10.
Hear Res ; 389: 107921, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32097828

ABSTRACT

The goal of the present study was to compare forward masking patterns by stimulation of low and high rates in cochlear implant users. Postlingually deafened Cochlear Nucleus® device users participated in the study. In experiment 1, two maskers of different rates (250 and 1000 pulses per second) were set at levels that produced equal masking for a probe presented at the same electrode as the maskers. This aligned the two masking functions at the on-site probe location. Then their forward masking patterns for the far probes were compared. Results showed that slope of the masked probe-threshold decay as a function of probe-masker separation was steeper for the high-rate than the low-rate masker. A linear model indicated that this difference in spread of neural excitation (SOE) was accounted for by two factors that were not correlated with each other. One factor was that the low-rate masker required a considerably higher current level to be equally effective in masking as the high-rate masker. The second factor was the effect of stimulation rate on loudness, i.e., integration of multiple pulses. This was consistent with our hypothesis that if an increase in stimulation rate does not result in an increased total neural response, then it is unlikely that the change in rate would change spatial distribution of the neural activity. Interestingly, the difference in masking effectiveness of the maskers predicted subjects' speech recognition. Poorer performers were those who showed more comparable masking effects by maskers of different rates. The difference in the masking effectiveness may indirectly measure the auditory neurons' excitability, which predicts speech recognition. In experiment 2, SOE of the high-rate and low-rate maskers were compared at a level that is clinically relevant, i.e., equal loudness. At equal loudness, high-rate stimulation not only produced an overall greater amount of forward masking, but also a shallower decay of masking with probe-masker separation (wider SOE), compared to low rate. The difference in SOE was the opposite to the findings from experiment 1. Whether the maskers were calibrated for equal masking or loudness, the absolute current level was always higher for the low-rate masker, which suggests that the SOE patterns cannot be explained by current spread alone. The fact that high-rate stimulation produced greater masking and wider SOE at equal loudness may explain why using high stimulation rates has not produced consistent benefits for speech recognition, and why lowering stimulation rate from the manufacturer's default sometimes results in improved speech recognition for subjects.


Subject(s)
Cochlea/physiopathology , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness/rehabilitation , Perceptual Masking , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Speech Perception , Acoustic Stimulation , Aged , Deafness/diagnosis , Deafness/physiopathology , Deafness/psychology , Electric Stimulation , Female , Hearing , Humans , Loudness Perception , Male , Middle Aged , Noise/adverse effects , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Recognition, Psychology , Speech Intelligibility
11.
Trends Hear ; 23: 2331216519889226, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31789131

ABSTRACT

Several types of otoacoustic emissions have been characterized in newborns to study the maturational status of the cochlea at birth and to develop effective tests of hearing. The stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission (SFOAE), a reflection-type emission elicited with a single low-level pure tone, is the least studied of these emissions and has not been comprehensively characterized in human newborns. The SFOAE has been linked to cochlear tuning and is sensitive to disruptions in cochlear gain (i.e., hearing loss) in adult subjects. In this study, we characterize SFOAEs evoked with rapidly sweeping tones in human neonates and consider the implications of our findings for human cochlear maturation. SFOAEs were measured in 29 term newborns within 72 hr of birth using swept tones presented at 2 oct/s across a four-octave frequency range (0.5­8 kHz); 20 normal-hearing young adults served as a control group. The prevalence of SFOAEs in newborns was as high as 90% (depending on how response "presence" was defined). Evidence of probe-tip leakage and abnormal ear-canal energy reflectance was observed in those ears with absent or unmeasurable SFOAEs. Results in the group of newborns with present stimulus-frequency emissions indicate that neonatal swept-tone SFOAEs are adult-like in morphology but have slightly higher amplitude compared with adults and longer SFOAE group delays. The origin of these nonadult-like features is probably mixed, including contributions from both conductive (ear canal and middle ear) and cochlear immaturities.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation , Hearing Tests/methods , Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous/physiology , Cochlea/physiology , Deafness/physiopathology , Ear Canal , Ear, Middle , Female , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Young Adult
12.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 145(6): EL508, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31255153

ABSTRACT

Sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITDs) was measured in two groups of listeners, one with normal hearing and one with sensorineural hearing loss. ITD detection thresholds were measured for pure tones and for speech (a single word), in quiet and in the presence of noise. It was predicted that effects of hearing loss would be reduced for speech as compared to tones due to the redundancy of information across frequency. Thresholds were better overall, and the effects of hearing loss less pronounced, for speech than for tones. There was no evidence that effects of hearing loss were exacerbated in noise.


Subject(s)
Auditory Perception/physiology , Deafness/physiopathology , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Hearing/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Adult , Auditory Threshold/physiology , Female , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Speech Perception/physiology
13.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 276(7): 1951-1959, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31053967

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Although the cochlear implantation procedure does not interfere with vestibular structures directly, both the vestibulum and the cochlea share the same inner ear fluid space, and this fluid may be responsible for transferring possibly damaging forces from one to the other. The purpose of the study is to assess postoperative vestibular function after partial deafness treatment-electro-acoustic stimulation (PDT-EAS) cochlear implantation. METHODS: Fifty-five patients were included in the study (30 females, 25 males, age 11-80, mean 41.8 ± 19.35). cVEMP and oVEMP were performed preoperatively and 1-3 months after cochlear implantation. Caloric and vHIT tests were conducted preoperatively and 4-6 months after cochlear implantation. RESULTS: Our study shows that, based on a wide range of electrodes, use of PDT-EAS is protective in terms of preserving vestibular function. It gives a rate of saccular damage of 15.79%, utricular damage of 19.04%, and a horizontal semicircular canal response reduction of 15.79%. CONCLUSIONS: PDT-EAS is protective in terms of preserving vestibular function. Nevertheless, it should be emphasized that the risk of vestibular damage cannot be totally eliminated even when hearing preservation techniques are adopted.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Cochlea/physiopathology , Cochlear Implantation , Deafness/surgery , Postoperative Complications , Vestibule, Labyrinth/physiopathology , Adult , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Deafness/diagnosis , Deafness/physiopathology , Female , Hearing Tests/methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Prospective Studies , Recovery of Function , Treatment Outcome
14.
PLoS One ; 14(4): e0215407, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30998726

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Cochlear implants provide an effective treatment option for those with severe hearing loss, including those with preserved low frequency hearing. However, certain issues can reduce implant efficacy including intracochlear tissue response and delayed loss of residual acoustic hearing. We describe a mouse model of cochlear implantation with chronic electric stimulation that can be used to study cochlear implant biology and related pathologies. METHODS: Twelve normal hearing adult CBA/J mice underwent unilateral cochlear implantation and were evenly divided into one group receiving electric stimulation and one not. Serial impedance and neural response telemetry (NRT) measurements were made to assess implant functionality. Functionality was defined as having at least one electrode with an impedance ≤ 35 kOhms. Mouse cochleae were harvested for histology and 3D x-ray microscopy 21 days post-operatively, or, in case the implant was still functional, at a later time point when the implant failed. A separate experiment measured the hearing preservation rate in 7 adult CBA/J mice undergoing unilateral cochlear implantation with serial auditory brainstem response (ABR) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE). RESULTS: Implants maintained functionality for a mean of 35 days in the non-stimulated group and 19.8 days in the stimulated group. Reliable NRT and behavioral responses to electric stimulation were recorded. A robust intracochlear peri-implant tissue response with neo-ossification was seen in all cochleae. Six of seven mice maintained intact low frequency hearing up to 6 weeks following cochlear implantation. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the feasibility of cochlear implantation and behaviorally significant electric stimulation in the mouse, with the potential for hearing preservation. This model may be combined with established mouse models of hearing loss and the large genetic and molecular research toolkit unique to the mouse for mechanistic and therapeutic investigations of cochlear implant biology.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Electric Stimulation Therapy , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem , Animals , Deafness/physiopathology , Deafness/therapy , Disease Models, Animal , Female , Humans , Male , Mice
15.
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec ; 81(2-3): 63-72, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30921808

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Due to the constant development of technology and medicine, the eligibility criteria for cochlear implantation (CI) are undergoing gradual expansion. OBJECTIVES: To provide long-term hearing preservation (HP) results for partial deafness treatment (PDT) of a group of adults using electro-natural stimulation (ENS). METHODS: We examined a database of medical records of patients who underwent CI in a single ENT center. We identified 12 adults (3 men and 9 women) who fitted the PDT-ENS classification. To calculate HP, we used the -HEARRING consensus and conducted statistical analyses using SPSS v24. RESULTS: In the long-term follow-up, 7 of 12 patients had complete HP and the remaining 5 had partial HP. None of the patients experienced significant hearing impairment. A significant improvement in speech understanding in both quiet and noise conditions was also observed. CONCLUSIONS: The use of minimally invasive surgery leads to excellent HP results in PDT-ENS patients, enabling them to enjoy the benefits of good speech discrimination which they would be unable to get from traditional hearing aids. Our findings support extending the inclusion criteria for CI to include this new group of patients who would otherwise obtain only limited benefit from conventional hearing aids.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Deafness/therapy , Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Hearing/physiology , Postoperative Care/methods , Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Deafness/physiopathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hearing Tests , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
16.
Cochlear Implants Int ; 20(3): 106-115, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30694120

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To optimize patient's maps in Electric Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) users based on the degree of post-operative aided hearing thresholds. METHODS: Twenty-one adult EAS patients participated in this study. Patients were subdivided into three groups, based on their unaided hearing threshold: (1) electric complementary (EC, n = 6) patients with ≤30 dB HL at 125-500 Hz with severe to profound hearing loss at higher frequencies who only use electric stimulation, (2) EAS (n = 8) patients with 30-70 dB HL from 125 to 250 Hz and profound hearing loss in high frequencies who use combined EAS, and (3) Marginal-EAS (M-EAS, n = 7) patients with 70-95 dB HL at frequencies ≤250 Hz who use combined EAS. Sentence perception in noise, melodic contour identification, and subjective preference were measured using Full Overlap, Narrow Overlap, Gap, and Meet maps. RESULT: Of the 21 patients that participated, 12 subjects were classified as complete hearing preservation and 9 subjects were classified as partial hearing preservation. The highest performing maps in sentence-in-noise perception and melodic contour identification were Gap, Meet, and Full Overlap for the EC, EAS, and the M-EAS groups, respectively. These results are consistently across different test materials and align with subject preference as well. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that clinical fitting in EAS listening should be individually tailored. EAS performance can be enhanced by optimizing maps between acoustic and electric stimulation based on the degree of aided hearing thresholds.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Auditory Threshold , Deafness/physiopathology , Electric Stimulation/methods , Speech Perception , Adult , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Cochlear Implantation , Deafness/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Noise , Postoperative Period , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
17.
J Neural Eng ; 16(1): 016023, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30523898

ABSTRACT

The performance of cochlear implant (CI) listeners is limited by several factors among which the lack of spatial selectivity of the electrical stimulation. Recently, many studies have explored the use of multipolar strategies where several electrodes are stimulated simultaneously to focus the electrical field in a restricted region of the cochlea. OBJECTIVE: These strategies are based on several assumptions concerning the electrical properties of the inner ear that need validation. The first, often implicit, assumption is that the medium is purely resistive and that the current waveforms produced by several electrodes sum linearly. The second assumption relates to the estimation of the contribution of each electrode to the overall electrical field. These individual contributions are usually obtained by stimulating each electrode and measuring the resulting voltage with the other inactive electrodes (i.e. the impedance matrix). However, measuring the voltage on active electrodes (i.e. the diagonal of the matrix) is not straightforward because of the polarization of the electrode-fluid interface. In existing multipolar strategies, the diagonal terms of the matrix are therefore inferred using linear extrapolation from measurements made at neighboring electrodes. APPROACH: In experiment 1, several impedance measurements were carried out in vitro and in eight CI users using sinusoidal and pulsatile waveforms to test the resistivity and linearity hypotheses. In experiment 2, we used an equivalent electrical model including a constant phase element in order to isolate the polarization component of the contact impedance. MAIN RESULTS: In experiment 1, high-resolution voltage recordings (1.1 MHz sampling) showed the resistivity assumption to be valid at 46.4 kHz, the highest frequency tested. However, these measures also revealed the presence of parasitic capacitive effects at high frequency that could be deleterious to multipolar strategies. Experiment 2 showed that the electrical model provides a better account of the high-resolution impedance measurements than previous approaches in the CI field that used resistor-capacitance circuit models. SIGNIFICANCE: These results validate the main hypotheses underlying the use of multipolar stimulation but also suggest possible modifications to their implementation, including the use of an impedance model and the modification of the electrical pulse waveform.


Subject(s)
Deafness/physiopathology , Deafness/therapy , Ear, Inner/physiopathology , Electric Impedance/therapeutic use , Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Electrodes, Implanted , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cochlear Implants , Electric Stimulation/instrumentation , Electric Stimulation/methods , Electric Stimulation Therapy/instrumentation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
18.
Hear Res ; 371: 40-52, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30458383

ABSTRACT

Intracochlear optical stimulation has been suggested as an alternative approach to hearing prosthetics in recent years. This study investigated the properties of a near infrared laser (NIR) induced optoacoustic effect. Pressure recordings were performed at the external meatus of anaesthetized guinea pigs during intracochlear NIR stimulation. The sound pressure and power spectra were determined. The results were compared to multi unit responses in the inferior colliculus (IC). Additionally, the responses to NIR stimulation were compared to IC responses induced by intracochlear electric stimulation at the same cochlear position to investigate a potentially confounding contribution of direct neural NIR stimulation. The power spectra of the sound recorded at the external meatus (n = 7) had most power at frequencies below 10 kHz and showed little variation for different stimulation sites. The mean spike rates of IC units responding to intracochlear NIR stimulation (n = 222) of 17 animals were significantly correlated with the power of the externally recorded signal at frequencies corresponding to the best frequencies of the IC units. The response strength as well as the sound pressure at the external meatus depended on the pulse peak power of the optical stimulus. The sound pressure recorded at the external meatus reached levels above 70 dB SPL peak equivalent. In hearing animals a cochlear activation apical to the location of the fiber was found. The absence of any NIR responses after pharmacologically deafening and the comparison to electric stimulation at the NIR stimulation site revealed no indication of a confounding direct neural NIR stimulation. Intracochlear optoacoustic stimulation might become useful in combined electro-acoustic stimulation devices in the future.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Cochlea/physiology , Photoacoustic Techniques/methods , Acoustic Stimulation/instrumentation , Animals , Deafness/physiopathology , Deafness/rehabilitation , Disease Models, Animal , Electric Stimulation/instrumentation , Electric Stimulation/methods , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Feasibility Studies , Female , Guinea Pigs , Inferior Colliculi/physiology , Infrared Rays , Lasers , Male , Photoacoustic Techniques/instrumentation
19.
Trends Hear ; 22: 2331216518813811, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30488764

ABSTRACT

Speech understanding abilities are highly variable among cochlear implant (CI) listeners. Poor electrode-neuron interfaces (ENIs) caused by sparse neural survival or distant electrode placement may lead to increased channel interaction and reduced speech perception. Currently, it is not possible to directly measure neural survival in CI listeners; therefore, obtaining information about electrode position is an alternative approach to assessing ENIs. This information can be estimated with computerized tomography (CT) imaging; however, postoperative CT imaging is not often available. A reliable method to assess channel interaction, such as the psychophysical tuning curve (PTC), offers an alternative way to identify poor ENIs. This study aimed to determine (a) the within-subject relationship between CT-estimated electrode distance and PTC bandwidths, and (b) whether using focused stimulation on channels with suspected poor ENI improves vowel identification and sentence recognition. In 13 CI listeners, CT estimates of electrode-to-modiolus distance and PTCs bandwidths were measured for all available electrodes. Two test programs were created, wherein a subset of electrodes used focused stimulation based on (a) broad PTC bandwidth (Tuning) and (b) far electrode-to-modiolus distance (Distance). Two control programs were also created: (a) Those channels not focused in the Distance program (Inverse-Control), and (b) an all-channel monopolar program (Monopolar-Control). Across subjects, scores on the Distance and Tuning programs were significantly higher than the Inverse-Control program, and similar to the Monopolar-Control program. Subjective ratings were similar for all programs. These findings suggest that focusing channels suspected to have a high degree of channel interaction result in quite different outcomes, acutely.


Subject(s)
Cochlea/surgery , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness/rehabilitation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Speech Perception , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Audiometry, Speech , Cochlea/diagnostic imaging , Cochlea/physiopathology , Comprehension , Deafness/diagnosis , Deafness/physiopathology , Deafness/psychology , Electric Stimulation , Female , Hearing , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Psychoacoustics , Speech Intelligibility , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
20.
Hear Res ; 370: 304-315, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30393003

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Shorter electrode arrays and soft surgical techniques allow for preservation of acoustic hearing in many cochlear implant (CI) users. Recently, we developed a method of using the Neural Response Telemetry (NRT) system built in Custom Sound EP clinical software to record acoustically evoked electrocochleography (ECoG) responses from an intracochlear electrode in Nucleus Hybrid CI users (Abbas et al., 2017). We recorded responses dominated by the hair cells (cochlear microphonic, CM/DIF) and the auditory nerve (auditory nerve neurophonic, ANN/SUM). Unfortunately, the recording procedure was time consuming, limiting potential clinical applications. This report describes a modified method to record the ECoG response more efficiently. We refer to this modified technique as the "short window" method, while our previous technique (Abbas et al., 2017) is referred as the "long window" method. In this report, our goal was to 1) evaluate the feasibility of the short window method to record the CM/DIF and ANN/SUM responses, 2) characterize the reliability and sensitivity of the measures recorded using the short window method, and 3) evaluate the relationship between the CM/DIF and ANN/SUM measures recorded using the modified method and audiometric thresholds. METHOD: Thirty-four postlingually deafened adult Hybrid CI users participated in this study. Acoustic tone bursts were presented at four frequencies (250, 500, 750, and 1000 Hz) at various stimulation levels via an insert earphone in both condensation and rarefaction polarities. Acoustically evoked ECoG responses were recorded from the most apical electrode in the intracochlear array. These two responses were subtracted to emphasize the CM/DIF responses and added to emphasize the ANN/SUM responses. Response thresholds were determined based on visual inspection of time waveforms, and trough-to-peak analysis technique was used to quantify response amplitudes. Within-subject comparison of responses measured using both short and long window methods were obtained from seven subjects. We also assessed the reliability and sensitivity of the short window method by comparing repeated measures from 19 subjects at different times. Correlations between CM/DIF and ANN/SUM measures using the short window recording method and audiometric thresholds were also assessed. RESULTS: Regardless of the recording method, CM/DIF responses were larger than ANN/SUM responses. Responses obtained using the short window method were positively correlated to those obtained using the conventional long window method. Subjects who had stable acoustic hearing at two different time points had similar ECoG responses at those points, confirming high test-retest reliability of the short window method. Subjects who lost hearing between two different time points showed increases in ECoG thresholds, suggesting that physiologic ECoG responses are sensitive to audiometric changes. Correlations between CM/DIF and ANN/SUM thresholds and audiometric thresholds at all tested frequencies were significant. CONCLUSION: This study compares two different recording methods. Intracochlear ECoG measures recorded using the short window technique were efficient, reliable, and repeatable. We were able to collect more frequency specific data with the short window method, and observed similar results between the long window and short window methods. Correlations between physiological thresholds and audiometric thresholds were similar to those reported previously using the long window method (Abbas et al., 2017). This is an important finding because it demonstrates that clinically-available software can be used to measure frequency-specific ECoG responses with enhanced efficiency, increasing the odds that this technique might move from the laboratory into clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Audiometry, Evoked Response/methods , Cochlea/innervation , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Cochlear Implants , Cochlear Microphonic Potentials , Cochlear Nerve/physiopathology , Deafness/rehabilitation , Hearing , Acoustic Stimulation , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Auditory Threshold , Deafness/physiopathology , Deafness/psychology , Electric Stimulation , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL