Success of Pulpal Anesthesia Following Buccal Infiltration of the Maxillary First Molar With 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL of 4% Articaine With 1:100,000 Epinephrine: A Prospective, Randomized Crossover Study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this prospective, randomized crossover study was to compare the peak incidence of success, onset, and incidence over time of pulpal anesthesia in maxillary first molars following a buccal infiltration of 1.8 mL or 3.6 mL of 4% articaine with 1:100 000 epinephrine. METHODS: A total of 118 adults received 1.8 mL or 3.6 mL of 4% articaine with 1:100 000 epinephrine via buccal infiltration of the maxillary first molar at 2 separate appointments. Electric pulp testing (EPT) of the maxillary first molar was performed over 68 minutes. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the peak incidence of anesthetic success (85% and 92%, respectively) in the maxillary first molar between 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL. The difference in onset times (4.5 min for 1.8 mL vs 4.4 min for 3.6 mL) was not statistically significant. However, the 3.6-mL volume did produce a significantly higher incidence of pulpal anesthesia from minutes 48 to 68 compared with the 1.8-mL volume. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in peak incidence or onset of pulpal anesthesia in the maxillary first molar between 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL of articaine with epinephrine. The incidence of pulpal anesthesia was significantly higher with 3.6 mL of articaine at 48 minutes and beyond, but neither volume provided complete pulpal anesthesia for all subjects that lasted at least 60 minutes.

Local Anesthetic Efficacy in Marijuana Users and Nonusers: A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the common clinical impression that patients with a history of drug use are challenging to anesthetize with local anesthesia, literature on this clinical phenomenon is sparse. The objective of this pilot study was to assess if differences in local anesthetic efficacy for dental treatment exist between marijuana users and nonusers. METHODS: Subjects were healthy adult males and females who qualified as either chronic marijuana users or nonusers. All subjects had an asymptomatic, vital maxillary lateral incisor that responded to an electric pulp test (EPT). A standard maxillary infiltration injection technique was employed using 1.7 mL 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine over the test tooth, and the tooth was tested with an EPT at 3-minute intervals. RESULTS: A total of 88% of nonusers (15/17) and 61% of users (11/18) were successfully anesthetized, defined as anesthesia onset within 10 minutes and lasting at least 15 minutes. The difference in the proportion of anesthetized subjects was not statistically significant (P = .073). For subjects with successful anesthesia, there was no significant difference between nonusers and users in the onset or duration of anesthesia. CONCLUSION: No significant differences in local anesthetic efficacy with respect to local anesthetic success, onset, or duration of action were found between chronic marijuana users and nonusers. However, larger studies are likely needed to provide more definitive evidence.

[Comparative analysis of 2% and 4% articaine solution efficacy and safety for the local anesthesia]. / Sravnitel'nyi analiz primeneniya 2% i 4% rastvora artikaina pri in"ektsionnoi mestnoi anestezii.

AIM: To determine the functional diagnostics criteria for predicting the effectiveness of using 2% and 4% solutions articaine without vasoconstrictor and with epinephrine content of 1:200.000. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study involved 357 patients (193 women and 164 men) aged 20 to 35 years. with the presence of intact single-rooted and multi-rooted teeth without periodontal pathology without pronounced general somatic pathology, and with a low level of situational anxiety according to the Spielberger-Khanin scale. All the patients received injection anesthesia by the infiltration method of 2% and 4% articaine solution without vasoconstrictor or with epinephrine concentration of 1:200.000. The effectiveness of local anesthesia was assessed by recording functional parameters (electrosensitivity threshold test and hemomicrocirculation) of the pulp of intact single-root and multi-root teeth before anesthesia, 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 minutes after local anesthesia. The safety of the anesthesia was determined by continuous monitoring of the patient's hemodynamic parameters: blood pressure, heart rate, blood oxygen saturation before anesthesia and within 60 minutes after. RESULTS: Articaine solution 2% with epinephrine concentration of 1:200.000 used for infiltration or modified periodontal anesthesia resulted in pulp electrosensitivity threshold growth by 95.93% and 93.58%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in hemodynamic values between both study groups. CONCLUSION: Analysis of the data obtained showed the effectiveness and safe anesthesia with drugs based on 2% articaine with an epinephrine concentration of 1:200.000.

Oximetría de pulso y su eficacia para diagnosticar vitalidad pulpar / Pulse oximetry and its use in diagnosing pulp vitality

Objetivo: Identificar y analizar en la literatura científica reciente el uso de la oximetría de pulso como método diagnóstico de vitalidad pulpar. Metodología: En este trabajo se llevó a cabo una revisión de la literatura en las plataformas de PubMed y Google Académico, en la cual se analizó el uso de la oximetría de pulso en el diagnóstico y monitoreo odontológico del estado pulpar. Resultados: Después de una exhaustiva revisión, y de acuerdo con los criterios de inclusión y exclusión, se analizaron 21 artículos. La mayoría de los trabajos consideran la oximetría de pulso un método alternativo de diagnóstico indoloro, seguro y eficaz; sin embargo, la adaptación de un instrumento de uso exclusivo odontológico es necesaria para una medición exacta de la saturación de oxígeno en la pulpa dental. Los avances tecnológicos en el campo clínico de la odontología nos han llevado a la búsqueda de nuevas técnicas diagnósticas clínicas para mejorar la atención y los tratamientos de los pacientes que acuden día con día a recibir una consulta odontológica. Conclusiones: En los últimos años la oximetría de pulso ha demostrado ser una herramienta de diagnóstico eficaz para el diagnóstico de la vitalidad pulpar. El análisis de los artículos incluidos en esta revisión concluye que la oximetría de pulso es una técnica innovadora que puede ser utilizada como una herramienta diagnóstica adyuvante en el diagnóstico de la vitalidad pulpar (AU)

Objective: To identify and analyze in the recent scientific literature the use of pulse oximetry as a diagnostic method for pulp vitality. Methodology: In this work, a literature review was carried out on the PubMed and Google Scholar platforms in which the use of pulse oximetry in the dental diagnosis and monitoring of pulp status was analyzed. Results: After an exhaustive review and in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 21 articles were analyzed. Most of the studies consider pulse oximetry an alternative method of painless, safe and effective diagnosis, however, the adaptation of an instrument for exclusive dental use is necessary for an exact measurement of the oxygen saturation in the dental pulp. Technological advances in the clinical field of dentistry have led us to search for new clinical diagnostic techniques to improve the care and treatment of patients who come every day to receive a dental consultation. Conclusions: In recent years, pulse oximetry has proven to be an effective diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of pulp vitality. The analysis of the articles included in this review concludes that pulse oximetry is an innovative technique that can be used as an adjunct diagnostic tool in the diagnosis of pulp vitality (AU)

[Evaluation of the effectiveness of the compression method for infiltration anesthesia of the mandibular molars]. / Otsenka effektivnosti primeneniya kompressionnogo metoda pri infil'tratsionnoi anestezii dlya obezbolivaniya zhevatel'nykh zubov na nizhnei chelyusti.

AIM: To study the depth of analgesia and the electrical excitability dynamics of the pulp of the tooth under local anesthesia without and with compression on the depot of local anesthetics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 87 men and 93 women took part in the study, the average age of men was 36.8±5.02 and the average age of women was 30.43±2.14. According to the indications, local anesthesia of infiltration type with and without compression at the depot of local anesthetics was performed. The injection was carried out with a solution of 4% articaine with epinephrine1:100000 or 1:200000. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on the used concentration of the vasoconstrictor with 4% articaine. The target area thermometry and electroodontometry (EOD) of the first mandibular molar were performed. The criterion for the onset of pulp analgesia was the value from 92 to 100 mA. RESULTS: Dynamics of change in pulp electrical excitability of the first molar with the use of 4% articaine with epinephrine 1:200000 without a compress showed that in the latter case the reduction of pulp electrical excitability to 96.6 µA, which is optimal for painless treatment, was developed by the 5th minute of the study and remained at the limit of 92.2-92.1 µA for 20 minutes. When using 4% articaine 1:100 000 it was noted that also the compression technique allowed to reach the necessary reduction of EOD indices to 93.5 µA by the 5th minute of the study, and to 97.2 µA by the 10th minute. Increased hypothermia in the injection depot area was noted thermographically, especially when high concentrations of epinephrine were used. CONCLUSION: Our own studies reflect the dynamics of change in the electrical excitability of the pulp of the first molar with the use of 4% articaine by compression method more intensively reduces the electrical reacrivity of the dental pulp depending on the concentration of the epinephrine: with the use of 1:100000, the advantage of the pressure technique is 19.3% and 1:200000 - 21.8%.

[Endodontic treatment efficacy enhancement by means of instrumental physiotherapy]. / Povyshenie éffektivnosti éndodonticheskogo lecheniia s pomoshch'iu apparaturnykh metodov.

The article describes in detail and examines the prospects of such methods as electroodontodiagnosis, diathermocoagulation and apex-phoresis. It proves the necessity of development and standardization of devices for the mentioned treatment modalities that will improve the effectiveness an quality of caries complications treatment.

Comparison of pulpal anesthesia and cardiovascular parameters with lidocaine with epinephrine and lidocaine with clonidine after maxillary infiltration in type 2 diabetic volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: The pulpal anesthetic and cardiovascular parameters obtained by 2 % lidocaine with epinephrine (LE; 1:80,000) or clonidine (LC; 15 mcg/ml) were studied in diabetes mellitus (DM) type 2 and healthy volunteers (72), after maxillary infiltration anesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Onset and duration of pulpal anesthesia were measured by electric pulp tester; vasoconstrictive effect of used local anesthetic mixtures by laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) through pulpal blood flow (PBF); systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and heart rate (HR) were registered by electrocardiogram monitoring. RESULTS: Onset of pulpal anesthesia was shorter for LC than for LE in healthy, while it was not different in diabetic participants; duration of pulpal anesthesia was significantly longer in type 2 diabetic participants, regardless of used anesthetic mixture. Significant reduction of PBF with LE was observed during 45 min in healthy and 60 min in diabetic participants, while with LC such reduction was observed during 45 min in both groups. LE caused a significant increase of SBP in the 5th and 15th minutes in diabetic versus healthy participants, while LC decreased SBP from the 10th to 60th minutes in healthy versus diabetic participants. CONCLUSIONS: DM type 2 influences duration of maxillary infiltration anesthesia obtained with LE and LC, and systolic blood pressure during LE anesthesia. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The obtained results provide elements for future protocols concerning intraoral local anesthesia in DM type 2 patients.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of traumatized immature permanent necrotic teeth after revascularization/revitalization therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Revascularization treatment is rapidly becoming an accepted treatment alternative for the management of endodontic pathology in immature permanent teeth with necrotic dental pulps. However, the success and timing of clinical resolution of symptoms, and radiographic outcomes of interest, such as continued hard tissue deposition within the root, are largely unknown. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 20 teeth were treated with a standardized revascularization treatment protocol and monitored for clinical and radiographic changes for 1 year. Standardized radiographs were collected at regular intervals, and radiographic changes were quantified. RESULTS: All 20 treated teeth survived during the 12-month follow-up period, and all 20 also met the clinical criteria for success at 12 months. As a group, the treated teeth showed a statistically significant increase in radiographic root width and length and a decrease in apical diameter, although the changes in many cases were quite small (such that the clinical significance is unclear). The within-case percent change in apical diameter after 3 months was 16% and had increased to 79% by 12 months, with 55% (11/20) showing complete apical closure. The within-case percent change in root length averaged less than 1% at 3 months and increased to 5% at 12 months. The within-case percent change in root thickness averaged 3% at 3 months and 21% at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Although clinical success was highly predictable with this procedure, clinically meaningful radiographic root thickening and lengthening are less predictable after 1-year of follow-up. Apical closure is the most consistent radiographic finding.

Effect of massage on the efficacy of the mental and incisive nerve block.

The purpose of this trial was to assess the effect of soft tissue massage on the efficacy of the mental and incisive nerve block (MINB). Thirty-eight volunteers received MINB of 2.2 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1 : 80,000 epinephrine on 2 occasions. At one visit the soft tissue overlying the injection site was massaged for 60 seconds (active treatment). At the other visit the crowns of the mandibular premolar teeth were massaged (control treatment). Order of treatments was randomized. An electronic pulp tester was used to measure pulpal anesthesia in the ipsilateral mandibular first molar, a premolar, and lateral incisor teeth up to 45 minutes following the injection. The efficacy of pulp anesthesia was determined by 2 methods: (a) by quantifying the number of episodes with no response to maximal electronic pulp stimulation after each treatment, and (b) by quantifying the number of volunteers with no response to maximal pulp stimulation (80 reading) on 2 or more consecutive tests, termed anesthetic success. Data were analyzed by McNemar, Mann-Whitney, and paired-samples t tests. Anesthetic success was 52.6% for active and 42.1% for control treatment for lateral incisors, 89.5 and 86.8% respectively for premolars, and 50.0 and 42.1% respectively for first molars (P = .344, 1.0, and .508 respectively). There were no significant differences in the number of episodes of negative response to maximum pulp tester stimulation between active and control massage. A total of 131 episodes were recorded after both active and control massage in lateral incisors (McNemar test, P = 1.0), 329 (active) versus 316 (control) episodes in the premolars (McNemar test, P = .344), and 119 (active) versus 109 (control) episodes respectively for first molars (McNemar test, P = .444). Speed of anesthetic onset and discomfort did not differ between treatments. We concluded that soft tissue massage after MINB does not influence anesthetic efficacy.

The effectiveness of an additional lingual infiltration in the pulpal anesthesia of mandibular teeth: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the effect of an additional lingual infiltration on the pulpal anesthesia of mandibular teeth. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Prospective clinical trials were searched from Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Pubmed, SCI, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Papers that met the inclusion criteria were accepted. Data was extracted by two investigators using a designed extraction form. The anesthetic efficacy of an additional lingual infiltration on the pulpal anesthesia of mandibular teeth was analyzed. RESULTS: Seven prospective randomized controlled trials were included. All subjects of these studies were volunteers with healthy pulps, without patients with pulpitis. Compared to buccal infiltration alone, an additional lingual infiltration following buccal infiltration is more likely to achieve a successful pulpal anesthesia in the mandibular incisor area, with a relative risk for success of 2.00 [1.08, 3.72] for 2% lidocaine and 1.32 [1.15, 1.51] for 4% articaine. For mandibular canines and premolars, the additional lingual infiltration following inferior alveolar nerve block did not enhance the anesthetic efficacy. In the mandibular molar area, no significant difference was found after an additional lingual infiltration with either 2% lidocaine or 4% articaine. CONCLUSION: An additional lingual infiltration following buccal infiltration can enhance the anesthetic efficacy compared with buccal infiltration alone in the mandibular incisor area. For mandibular canines, premolars, and molars, an additional lingual infiltration is not recommended, since no data exist to support such usage. Lingual infiltration of articaine in the mandibular teeth with pulpitis should be studied further.

Anesthetic efficacy of a primary articaine infiltration and a repeat articaine infiltration in the incisive/mental nerve region of mandibular premolars: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study.

INTRODUCTION: The authors conducted a prospective, randomized, single-blind study to determine the degree of pulpal anesthesia obtained with a primary infiltration of 1 cartridge of articaine in the incisive/mental nerve region of the mandibular second premolar and to determine the anesthetic efficacy of a repeat articaine infiltration 20 minutes after the primary infiltration. METHODS: One hundred asymptomatic adult subjects randomly received 2 sets of injections consisting of a primary mandibular second premolar infiltration of 1 cartridge of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine plus a repeat infiltration 20 minutes later (using the same volume of articaine) or a mock repeat infiltration in 2 separate appointments spaced at least 1 week apart. The authors used an electric pulp tester to test the first molar, premolars, canine, and incisors for anesthesia in 4-minute cycles for 120 minutes. RESULTS: The success rates of the initial infiltrations for the first molar, canine, and incisor teeth ranged from 59% to 19%. The premolar success rates were moderately successful (ie, 80%-87%), but anesthesia declined after 20-25 minutes. The repeat infiltration at 20 minutes significantly increased the success rate (92%-94%) and the duration of pulpal anesthesia for the premolars. CONCLUSIONS: The initial infiltration was not effective in anesthetizing the first molar, canine, or incisor teeth and was only moderately successful in the premolars. Although the repeat infiltration significantly increased the success rate and duration in the premolars, the initial infiltration success rates were not high enough to support the use of this regimen as a combined anesthetic technique.

Should pulp chamber pulpotomy be seen as a permanent treatment? Some preliminary thoughts.

AIM: To investigate the benefits of pulpotomy (to the level of the floor of the pulp chamber) as an endodontic treatment for teeth with vital pulps. METHODOLOGY: Seventeen patients, aged 7-54 years (mean of 37.2 year), were treated by pulpotomy and filling with ProRoot MTA(®) in premolar or molar teeth with vital pulps and without clinical evidence of irreversible pulpitis. The patients were then followed up for 12 to 24 months and the teeth then assessed by clinical and radiographic examination. Statistical analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier survival probability statistics to estimate the survival of the treated teeth. RESULTS: At 24 months, the survival rate without any complementary treatment was estimated to be 82%. Two of the 17 treated teeth required root canal treatment for pain control and one for prosthetic reasons. CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, pulpotomy offered a viable alternative to root canal treatment for teeth with vital pulps in the short term. However, there is insufficient clinical evidence to consider this technique for the treatment of every permanent tooth. Nevertheless, it should be considered as a potential alternative approach to be further developed for future applications.

Effect of topical anesthesia on pain during infiltration injection and success of anesthesia for maxillary central incisors.

INTRODUCTION: This study was performed to investigate the effect of topical anesthesia on pain during needle penetration and infiltration injection as well as the effect of pain during injection on success rate of anesthesia in maxillary central incisors. METHODS: In a crossover double-blind study, 25 volunteers randomly received either topical anesthesia or placebo before infiltration injection with prilocaine for their maxillary central incisors in 2 separate appointments. The pain after needle penetration and during injection was separately recorded. An electric pulp tester was used to evaluate the success of the anesthetic injection. Data were analyzed by McNemar, Wilcoxon, and χ(2) tests. RESULTS: Overall for 50 injections, 72% of the teeth had successful anesthesia. No significant difference was found between placebo and topical anesthetic groups for the pain of needle penetration as well as pain during injection (P > .05). The volunteers who reported moderate-to-severe pain during injection showed no significant difference in the success rate of anesthesia compared with those with no or mild pain during injections (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Use of topical anesthesia had no significant effect on pain during either needle penetration or injection. Pain during injection had no significant effect on the success of anesthesia.

Age limit for infiltration anaesthesia for the conservative treatment of mandibular first molars. A clinical study on a paediatric population.

AIM: The aims of this study were to assess the age limit for infiltration anaesthesia as an effective technique in treating carious lesions of first permanent molars in the paediatric age and if differences exist between males and females. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 51 teeth from 48 different patients aged between 6 and 14 years were included in the study. The anaesthetic solution used was 1.8 ml of 2% mepivacaine with 1:100000 epinephrine. The effectiveness of anaesthesia was assessed by electrical pulp test after 3, 5, 7 and 10 minutes. RESULTS: In 56.9% of the treated cases a single mandibular infiltration was sufficient to induce complete pulpal anaesthesia of the tooth to be treated. Under 10 years of age, the infiltration technique was effective in 85.2% of cases. The success rate of anaesthesia also decreased significantly and not linearly in function of age. The success of infiltration anaesthesia was not related to gender. CONCLUSION: Mandibular infiltration anaesthesia is a successful technique for most patients under 10 years (success rate: 85.2%) especially for the younger ones, with no differences between males and females. After this age that success rate dramatically drops.

Aspiration in intra-ligamental anaesthesia of lower first molar teeth: a pilot study.

AIMS: This pilot prospective, randomised, crossover study of positive aspiration frequency in intra-ligamental anaesthesia (ILA) was conducted with the following aims: (1) to determine the frequency of positive aspiration of blood after the administration of ILA at lower first molars, and (2) to evaluate the depth of the pulpal anaesthesia of lower first molars after positive or negative aspiration of blood, using electro-testing. METHODS: Intra-ligamental anaesthesia with 4% articaine with epinephrine was administered to the lower first molars of 36 dental student participants. Pulpal analgesia of these 36 molars (17 left and 19 right) was obtained after 114 intra-ligamental insertions, with 3.2 insertions on average, with the help of a computer syringe. The depth of pulpal analgesia after each insertion administration was assessed with electro-testing. RESULTS: A total of 114 intra-ligamental needle insertions were administered, of which 44 led to pulpal analgesia. After up to five administrations of ILA, all 36 molars achieved pulpal analgesia. In 34 of 36 (94.4%) subjects, ILA was accompanied by a positive aspiration test (AT). In the other two cases, successful but slow onset pulpal analgesia was obtained after five intra-ligamental needle insertions but with negative ATs. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, the aspiration of blood after the administration of ILA has been studied. The frequency of positive aspiration of blood and successful pulpal analgesia was 94%. There was a very strong association between positive aspiration of blood after ILA and good pulpal analgesia. When there was negative aspiration of blood after the administration of an ILA, in rare cases pulpal analgesia developed after a delay of 3-5 minutes.

Success rate of single- versus two-visit root canal treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of single- versus 2-visit root canal treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis after a 2-year follow-up period. METHODS: Three hundred maxillary and mandibular nonvital teeth with apical periodontitis were treated in either a single visit or 2 visits. The main inclusion criteria were radiographic evidence of apical periodontitis (minimum size ≥ 2.0 × 2.0 mm) and a diagnosis of pulpal necrosis confirmed by a negative response to hot and cold tests. Radiographically, all teeth showed small and irregular periapical radiolucencies before treatment. The canals were enlarged with LightSpeedLSX (Discus Dental, Culver City, CA) root canal instruments to a final apical preparation size #60 for anterior and premolar teeth and size #45 to #55 for molars. The EndoVac negative-pressure irrigation system (Discus Dental) was used for disinfecting irrigation, and all canals were filled by lateral compaction of gutta-percha and Sealapex sealer (SybronEndo, Orange, CA). The healing results were clinically and radiographically evaluated 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Of the 300 teeth treated, 18 were lost to follow-up, 9 in the 2-visit group and 9 in the 1-visit group. Of the 282 teeth studied, the randomization procedure had allocated 146 teeth to 1-visit treatment and 136 teeth to 2-visit treatment. Teeth with symptoms of persisting periapical inflammation were scored as not healed. Teeth with a reduced periapical rarefaction were judged as uncertain. Teeth with complete restitution of the periodontal contours were judged as healed. In the 1-visit group, 141 of 146 teeth (96.57%) were classified as healed as compared with 121 (88.97%) of 136 teeth in the 2-visit group. Eleven cases were classified as uncertain in the 2-visit group (8.08%) compared with 4 (2.73%) in the 1-visit group. Two of 10 teeth in the 2-visit group presented with pain before the 2-year follow-up and were classified as not healed. The hypothesis tests were conducted at the 0.05 level of significance. Statistical analysis of the healing results did not show any significant difference between the groups (P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Several factors play an important role in the decision-making process of 1- versus 2-visit endodontics. Among these are objective factors like preoperative diagnosis, the ability to obtain infection control, root canal anatomy, procedural complications, and subjective factors like patients' signs and symptoms. This study provided evidence that with a treatment protocol with instrumentation to predefined larger apical instrumentation sizes and irrigation with a negative apical pressure system can lead to healing in cases of apical periodontitis, which is a significant finding compared with more dated studies that showed average healing of apical periodontitis cases. With the given sample size, there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 treatment modalities.

Pulsed Nd: YAG laser induces pulpal analgesia: a randomized clinical trial.

This double-blind, randomized, clinical trial investigated the effectiveness and underlying mechanism of neural inhibition of pulsed Nd:YAG laser induction of pulpal analgesia compared with 5% EMLA anesthetic cream. Forty-four paired premolars from 44 orthodontic patients requiring bilateral premolar extraction from either dental arch were randomly assigned to the 'Laser plus Sham-EMLA' or 'EMLA plus Sham-Laser' treatment group. Analgesia was tested by an Electric Pulp Tester (EPT) and the cutting of a standardized cavity, which was terminated when participants reported sensitivity, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and numbness were recorded. Statistical analyses were done by paired t test, McNemar's test, and a chi-squared test (p < 0.05). Sixty-eight percent of laser- and 59% of EMLA-treated teeth had completed cavities with statistically significant EPT increases above baseline. No significant within-patient differences were found for either group. No laser-treated participants reported numbness. The trial confirmed that the pulsed Nd:YAG laser effectively induced pulpal analgesia, by suppression of intradental nerve responses to electrical and mechanical stimuli. Such a laser provides an alternative for dental pain management (ANZ-Clinical Trial Registry: N12611001099910).

A comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in achieving pulpal anesthesia in maxillary teeth with irreversible pulpitis.

INTRODUCTION: To assess the efficacy of buccal infiltrations of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in achieving anesthesia in maxillary teeth with irreversible pulpitis. METHODS: This randomized double-blind clinical trial included 100 patients diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis in maxillary teeth. Patients received 2.0 mL 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine or 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in the buccal sulcus adjacent to the tooth with pulpitis. Before and every 2 minutes up to a maximum of 10 minutes after injection, the response of the test tooth was assessed using an electronic pulp tester. Successful pulp anesthesia was considered to have occurred when no response was obtained to the maximum stimulation (80 reading) of the pulp tester during the test period, at which time treatment commenced. Treatment was regarded as being successfully completed when it was associated with no pain. The time to onset of successful pulp anesthesia was recorded for each test tooth. Injection discomfort was recorded on standard 100-mm visual analog scales (VASs). Data were analyzed by the Chi-square and Student t tests. RESULTS: Fifty patients received articaine and 50 received lidocaine. Seventy-three of the 100 patients achieved pulpal anesthesia within 10 minutes of injection: 38 after articaine and 35 after lidocaine (P = .5). The onset of pulpal anesthesia after articaine and lidocaine buccal infiltrations was similar (mean and standard deviations: 4.9 ± 2.7 minutes vs 5.1 ± 2.4 minutes, respectively; t = 0.2; P = .82). Pain-free treatment was completed in 33 patients after articaine and 29 after lidocaine buccal infiltrations (P = .63). Although articaine buccal injection was significantly more comfortable than lidocaine buccal injection (t = 2.3, P = .026), both were associated with mild discomfort on VAS (means ± standard deviation: 10.8 mm ± 11.7 mm vs 17.5 mm ± 17.6 mm, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in efficacy between 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in achieving anesthesia in maxillary teeth with irreversible pulpitis after buccal infiltration.

Comparison of ropivacaine and lidocaine with epinephrine for infiltration anesthesia in dentistry. A randomized study.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of maxillary infiltration anesthesia with 0.5% plain ropivacaine or 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000. METHODS: 60 volunteers received 1.8 ml of the anesthetic for infiltration anesthesia of maxillary central and lateral incisors and canine teeth. The onset time and duration of pulp anesthesia were assessed with an electric pulp tester. The duration time of numbness of the upper lip was also monitored. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured before and after administration of the solution. RESULTS: The efficacy of anesthesia of the lateral and central incisors was 100% for both anesthetics. There were small insignificant differences in effectiveness of canine pulp anesthesia. The mean onset time was significantly shorter for ropivacaine--2.2 minutes vs. 5.1 for lidocaine. Ropivacaine also had a significantly longer duration of action--mean time 79.2 minutes. Ropivacaine caused statistically significant increases in blood pressure and heart rate.

[A comparison of the clinical anesthetic efficacy of articaine infiltration and lidocaine blocking for microport extraction of impacted mandibular molar].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy of the infiltration anesthesia with primacaine and the nerve blocking anesthesia with lidocaine for microport extraction of impacted lower third molar. METHODS; 104 chosen patients had both sides of impacted lower third molars extracted in this study. Patients were given local anesthesia with either primacaine or lidocaine randomly at each side, and then underwent microport extraction. Clinical factors including effective proportion (EP), effecting time point (ETP), visual analogue scale of pain (VASp), alteration of systolic pressures (ASP) and analgesia duration (AD) were evaluated statistically by means of paired t-test. RESULTS: The EP of experimental group was higher than the control group (P = 0.024). The ETP of soft tissue and alveoli-dental pulp was (1.04 +/- 0.21), (2.44 +/- 2.60) min in the experimental group, and much earlier than that of the control group (P = 0.002, P = 0.032). The VASp and ASP of experimental group were lower than the control group (P = 0.041, P = 0.018). AD was (103.6 +/- 35.5) min, and higher than the control group (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The infiltration anesthesia with primacaine has been proven to be a easier, reliable and quick-acting method. We suggest it an alternative method replacing the 2% lidocaine blocking during microport extraction of impacted lower third molar.