Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 48
Filter
Add more filters

Complementary Medicines
Publication year range
1.
Dermatol Clin ; 39(4): 587-597, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34556248

ABSTRACT

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on dermatology practice cannot be overstated. At its peak, the pandemic resulted in the temporary closure of ambulatory sites as resources were reallocated towards pandemic response efforts. Many outpatient clinics have since reopened and are beginning to experience a semblance of pre-pandemic routine, albeit with restrictions in place. We provide an overview of how COVID-19 has affected dermatology practice globally beginning with the rise of teledermatology. A summary of expert recommendations that shape the "new normal" in various domains of dermatology practice, namely, dermatology consultation, procedural dermatology, and phototherapy, is also provided.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities/trends , Dermatology/standards , Primary Health Care/trends , Skin Diseases/therapy , Telemedicine/trends , COVID-19/epidemiology , Dermatology/trends , Health Services Accessibility/trends , Humans , Office Visits/trends , Skin Diseases/epidemiology
2.
Clin Dermatol ; 39(1): 23-32, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33972048

ABSTRACT

The first cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Iran were detected on February 19, 2020. Soon the entire country was hit with the virus. Although dermatologists were not immediately the frontline health care workers, all aspects of their practice were drastically affected. Adapting to this unprecedented crisis required urgent appropriate responses. With preventive measures and conserving health care resources being the most essential priorities, dermatologists, as an integral part of the health system, needed to adapt their practices according to the latest guidelines. The spectrum of the challenges encompassed education, teledermatology, lasers, and other dermatologic procedures, as well as management of patients who were immunosuppressed or developed drug reactions and, most importantly, the newly revealed cutaneous signs of COVID-19. These challenges have paved the way for new horizons in dermatology.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Dermatology/standards , Hospitals, University , Skin Diseases/etiology , Skin Diseases/therapy , COVID-19/complications , Cosmetic Techniques , Dermatitis/etiology , Dermatologic Surgical Procedures , Dermatology/education , Dermatology/methods , Dermoscopy , Drug Eruptions/etiology , Hand Dermatoses/etiology , Hand Disinfection , Humans , Internship and Residency , Iran/epidemiology , Laser Therapy , Personal Protective Equipment/adverse effects , Phototherapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Private Practice , SARS-CoV-2 , Skin Diseases/drug therapy , Telemedicine , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
3.
Am J Clin Dermatol ; 22(2): 205-220, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33492611

ABSTRACT

Mastocytosis is a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by the accumulation of clonal mast cells in organs such as the skin and bone marrow. In contrast to adults, most affected children have only cutaneous involvement. This article reviews the molecular pathogenesis, skin findings, mast cell mediator-related symptoms, evaluation, and management of childhood-onset mastocytosis, noting differences from adult-onset disease. Current classification of cutaneous mastocytosis and the natural histories of different variants in pediatric patients are highlighted, with a focus on clinical manifestations with prognostic implications. A practical algorithm is provided to guide clinical assessment, laboratory and other investigations, and longitudinal monitoring, including recognition of hepatosplenomegaly as a marker of systemic disease and utilization of allele-specific quantitative PCR (ASqPCR) to detect KIT mutations in the peripheral blood. Updated information and consensus-based recommendations regarding possible triggers of mast-cell degranulation (e.g., physical, medications) are discussed, with an emphasis on patient-specific factors and avoiding excessive parental concern. Lastly, an individualized, stepwise approach to treatment of symptoms, skin-directed therapy, and potential use of kinase inhibitors for severe systemic disease is outlined.


Subject(s)
Critical Pathways/standards , Mast Cells/pathology , Mastocytosis, Cutaneous/diagnosis , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Skin/pathology , Adult , Age Factors , Biomarkers/analysis , Cell Degranulation , Child , Consensus , Dermatology/methods , Dermatology/standards , Disease Progression , Humans , Mastocytosis, Cutaneous/genetics , Mastocytosis, Cutaneous/pathology , Mastocytosis, Cutaneous/therapy , Mutation , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prognosis , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 20(1): 84-87, 2021 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33400416

ABSTRACT

Atopic dermatitis (AD) has been shown to have an increasing incidence in Asia, congruous with the trends observed worldwide. The severity of the condition has been associated with challenges in disease control. Moreover, a significant number of patients do not adhere to their physicians’ recommendations correctly and prefer alternative treatments. Better education regarding the nature of the disease and its appropriate management may improve patient compliance and lead to better control. An ABC scheme of AD management entails anti-inflammatory, barrier repair and basic skin care strategies to adequately manage AD. It is an easy-to-follow model which helps lessen distress and improve the quality of life amongst patients. An expert panel composed of specialists in the field of dermatology and pediatric dermatology in the Philippines convened to review current data and management practices in order to provide key treatment recommendations and identify current gaps in the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis. This scientific expert panel, likewise, seeks to provide guidance for all healthcare professionals involved in the care and management of AD patients.J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(1):84-87. doi:10.36849/JDD.5080.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic/therapy , Dermatology/standards , Patient Education as Topic/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Complementary Therapies/adverse effects , Complementary Therapies/methods , Dermatology/methods , Emollients/administration & dosage , Humans , Patient Compliance , Philippines , Quality of Life , Skin Care/methods , Skin Care/standards , Water Loss, Insensible/drug effects
5.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 84(2): 432-470, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32738429

ABSTRACT

Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory, multisystem disease that affects up to 3.2% of the United States population. This guideline addresses important clinical questions that arise in psoriasis management and care and provides recommendations based on the available evidence. The treatment of psoriasis with topical agents and with alternative medicine will be reviewed, emphasizing treatment recommendations and the role of dermatologists in monitoring and educating patients regarding benefits as well as risks that may be associated. This guideline will also address the severity assessment methods of psoriasis in adults.


Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies/methods , Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Dermatology/methods , Psoriasis/therapy , Academies and Institutes/standards , Administration, Cutaneous , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/standards , Complementary Therapies/standards , Dermatology/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Foundations/standards , Humans , Patient Education as Topic/standards , Psoriasis/diagnosis , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , United States
6.
Am J Clin Dermatol ; 22(2): 193-204, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32918267

ABSTRACT

Oral antibiotics are integral for treating inflammatory acne based on what is understood about the pathogenesis as well as the role of Cutibacterium acnes. However, rising concerns of antibiotic resistance and the perception of "antibiotic phobia" create potential limitations on their integration in an acne treatment regimen. When prescribing oral antibiotics, dermatologists need to consider dosage, duration, and frequency, and to avoid their use as monotherapy. These considerations are important, along with the use of newer strategies and compounds, to reduce adverse-event profiles, antibiotic resistance, and to optimize outcomes. Aside from concomitant medications, allergies, and disease severity, costs and patient demographics can influence variability in prescribing plans. There are multiple published guidelines and consensus statements for the USA and Europe to promote safe antibiotic use by dermatologists. However, there is a lack of head-to-head studies and evidence for comparative superiority of any individual antibiotic, as well as any evidence to support the use of agents other than tetracyclines. Although oral antibiotics are one of the main options for moderate to severe acne, non-antibiotic therapy such as isotretinoin and hormonal therapies should be considered. As newer therapies and more outcomes data emerge, so will improved management of antibiotic therapy to foster patient safety.


Subject(s)
Acne Vulgaris/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Propionibacterium acnes/drug effects , Acne Vulgaris/microbiology , Administration, Oral , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Contraceptives, Oral/therapeutic use , Dermatology/methods , Dermatology/standards , Drug Prescriptions/standards , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Humans , Isotretinoin/therapeutic use , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Propionibacterium acnes/isolation & purification , Spironolactone/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
7.
JAMA Dermatol ; 157(1): 98-104, 2021 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33175124

ABSTRACT

Importance: Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS) is a neurocutaneous syndrome involving the skin, brain, and eyes. Consensus recommendations for management are lacking. Objective: To consolidate the current literature with expert opinion to make recommendations that will guide treatment and referral for patients with port-wine birthmarks (PWBs). Evidence Review: In this consensus statement, 12 nationally peer-recognized experts in dermatology with experience treating patients with SWS were assembled. Key topics and questions were formulated for each group and included risk stratification, optimum treatment strategies, and recommendations regarding light-based therapies. A systematic PubMed search was performed of English-language articles published between December 1, 2008, and December 1, 2018, as well as other pertinent studies identified by the expert panel. Clinical practice guidelines were recommended. Findings: Treatment of PWBs is indicated to minimize the psychosocial impact and diminish nodularity and potentially tissue hypertrophy. Better outcomes may be attained if treatments are started at an earlier age. In the US, pulsed dye laser is the standard for all PWBs regardless of the lesion size, location, or color. When performed by experienced physicians, laser treatment can be safe for patients of all ages. The choice of using general anesthesia in young patients is a complex decision that must be considered on a case-by-case basis. Conclusions and Relevance: These recommendations are intended to help guide clinical practice and decision-making for patients with SWS and those with isolated PWBs and may improve patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
Consensus , Low-Level Light Therapy/standards , Port-Wine Stain/radiotherapy , Sturge-Weber Syndrome/radiotherapy , Clinical Decision-Making , Dermatology/methods , Dermatology/standards , Humans , Lasers, Dye/adverse effects , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Low-Level Light Therapy/instrumentation , Port-Wine Stain/etiology , Port-Wine Stain/psychology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Sturge-Weber Syndrome/complications , Sturge-Weber Syndrome/psychology , Treatment Outcome
8.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 19(10): 935-940, 2020 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33026777

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common skin condition characterized by disturbed barrier function, skin inflammation, and cutaneous dysbiosis. Clinically, it manifests as chronic-recurrent xerosis, pruritus, and erythematous lesions. Its pathophysiology is complex, making the selection of appropriate treatment options a task. AIM: To share insights gained from a literature review and discussions with experts in dermatology on key factors related to the prevention, treatment, and management of AD in relation to the skin microbiome. METHODS: Results from an expert panel were summarized and discussed to provide updated recommendations for the treatment and maintenance of AD. RESULTS: Evidence supports a strategy for managing inflammatory skin diseases with a selenium-rich post-biotic thermal water and biomass containing moisturizer. The moisturizer helps to restore homeostasis of the skin, re-populate a diverse microbiome, encourage the growth of commensal bacteria, and improve barrier function and symptoms of AD. CONCLUSIONS: Normalization of skin microbiome diversity using a topical moisturizer containing post-biotic aqua and biomass may offer a valuable option for the treatment and maintenance of inflammatory skin diseases. Clinicians should discuss the benefits of this treatment in the context of a full AD management program that covers prevention, active treatment, and maintenance. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(10):935-940. doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.5393.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic/therapy , Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Hydrotherapy/methods , Microbiota/immunology , Skin/microbiology , Administration, Cutaneous , Adult , Child, Preschool , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/standards , Dermatitis, Atopic/complications , Dermatitis, Atopic/immunology , Dermatitis, Atopic/microbiology , Dermatology/methods , Dermatology/standards , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Drug Therapy, Combination/standards , Humans , Infant , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prebiotics/administration & dosage , Probiotics/administration & dosage , Severity of Illness Index , Skin/drug effects , Skin/immunology , Symbiosis/immunology , Treatment Outcome , Water Loss, Insensible/drug effects , Water Loss, Insensible/immunology
9.
JAMA Dermatol ; 156(10): 1079-1085, 2020 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32609305

ABSTRACT

Importance: Up to 90% of patients treated with an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRi) experience cutaneous toxic effects that are negatively associated with quality of life and lead to treatment interruptions. The Skin Toxicity Evaluation Protocol With Panitumumab trial found reduced incidence of skin toxicity and quality of life impairment with preemptive use of doxycycline hyclate, topical corticosteroids, moisturizers, and sunscreen, demonstrating the benefit of prophylactic treatment for skin toxicity. Objective: To evaluate the association of a comprehensive skin toxicity program with adherence to prophylaxis guidelines for the prevention of EGFRi-associated cutaneous toxic effects. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all adult patients receiving at least 1 dose of cetuximab at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in the calendar year 2012 (2 years after publication of the Skin Toxicity Evaluation Protocol With Panitumumab) or the calendar year 2017 (2 years after full implementation of the Skin Toxicities from Anticancer Therapies program). Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were rate of preemptive rash treatment and selection of preemptive agents. Secondary outcomes were incidence of rash, rates of rescue treatments, rates of cetuximab dose changes or interruptions, and overall survival at 2 years. Results: There were 118 patients (85 men; median age, 62.4 years [range, 23.5-91.7 years]) treated with cetuximab in 2012 and 90 patients (70 men; median age, 62.5 years [range, 30.7-90.5 years]) treated with cetuximab in 2017; 11 patients (9%) in 2012 and 31 patients (34%) in 2017 were treated at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute affiliate sites. At cetuximab treatment initiation, 29 patients (25%) in 2012 and 42 patients (47%) in 2017 were prophylactically treated for skin toxicity (P < .001). From 2012 to 2017, preemptive tetracycline use (13 of 29 [45%] to 30 of 42 [71%]; P = .02) and topical corticosteroid use (2 of 29 [7%] to 24 of 42 [57%]; P < .001) increased and topical antibiotic use (23 of 29 [79%] to 18 of 42 [43%]; P = .002) decreased. There was no significant difference in incidence of rash by prophylaxis status. Patients prescribed prophylactic treatment were 94% less likely to require a first rescue treatment for rash (adjusted odds ratio, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.02-0.16; P < .001), 74% less likely to require a second rescue treatment for rash (adjusted odds ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08-0.83; P = .02), and 79% less likely to experience a cetuximab dose change or interruption (adjusted odds ratio, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.81; P = .02) than patients not prescribed prophylactic treatment, adjusting for treatment site and year. Conclusions and Relevance: Dermatologists can add value to oncology care by raising awareness of appropriate treatment options and increasing adherence to evidence-based prophylaxis protocols for EGFRi-associated rash, which is associated with decreased interventions and toxicity-associated chemotherapy interruptions.


Subject(s)
Cancer Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Drug Eruptions/prevention & control , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cancer Care Facilities/organization & administration , Cancer Care Facilities/standards , Cetuximab/administration & dosage , Cetuximab/adverse effects , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/standards , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/statistics & numerical data , Dermatology/organization & administration , Dermatology/standards , Dermatology/statistics & numerical data , Drug Eruptions/etiology , ErbB Receptors/antagonists & inhibitors , Evidence-Based Medicine/organization & administration , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Female , Guideline Adherence/trends , Humans , Male , Massachusetts , Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Medical Oncology/standards , Medical Oncology/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
10.
Int J Dermatol ; 58 Suppl 1: 4-28, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31282026

ABSTRACT

This Clinical Practice Guideline on the systemic treatment of Psoriasis includes the recommendations elaborated by a panel of experts from the Latin American Psoriasis Society SOLAPSO, who assessed the quality of the available evidence using the GRADE system and the PICO process to guide the literature search. To answer each question, the experts discussed the results of randomized controlled trials, observational studies and metanalysis evaluating the interventions identified (non-biologics, biologics and phototherapy) in different populations of patients with moderate to severe plaque-psoriasis, which was summarized in Tables ad-hoc. The main end-points considered to assess efficacy were PASI 50, 75, 90 and 100, PGA 0-1 and significant improvement of health-related quality of life. Specific adverse events, either severe or leading to treatment interruption, were also evaluated. The 31 recommendations included in this CPG follow the structure proposed by GRADE: direction (for or against) and strength (strong or weak). The goal of this CPG is to improve the management of patients with psoriasis by recommending interventions of proved benefit and providing a reference standard for the treating physician. Adhering to the contents of this CPG does not guarantee therapeutic success. The final decision on the specific treatment is the responsibility of the physician based on the individual circumstances and considering the values, the preferences and the opinions of the patient or caregivers.


Subject(s)
Biological Products/therapeutic use , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Dermatology/standards , Phototherapy/standards , Psoriasis/therapy , Administration, Oral , Dermatology/methods , Humans , Injections, Subcutaneous , Latin America , Phototherapy/methods , Psoriasis/diagnosis , Severity of Illness Index , Societies, Medical/standards
11.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 81(3): 775-804, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31351884

ABSTRACT

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease involving multiple organ systems and affecting approximately 3.2% of the world's population. In this section of the guidelines of care for psoriasis, we will focus the discussion on ultraviolet (UV) light-based therapies, which include narrowband and broadband UVB, UVA in conjunction with photosensitizing agents, targeted UVB treatments such as with an excimer laser, and several other modalities and variations of these core phototherapies, including newer applications of pulsed dye lasers, intense pulse light, and light-emitting electrodes. We will provide an in-depth, evidence-based discussion of efficacy and safety for each treatment modality and provide recommendations and guidance for the use of these therapies alone or in conjunction with other topical and/or systemic psoriasis treatments.


Subject(s)
Dermatology/standards , Phototherapy/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Psoriasis/therapy , Academies and Institutes/standards , Foundations/standards , Humans , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Phototherapy/instrumentation , Phototherapy/methods , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Treatment Outcome , United States
12.
Eur J Pediatr ; 178(7): 1095-1103, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31119437

ABSTRACT

In this study, the care for children with a severe chronic skin disease in our national expert center of pediatric dermatology was evaluated. Patients and their parents were questioned by using existing questionnaires: 50 pediatric patients completed the modified "my positive health" questionnaire of Huber and 51 parents completed Pelentsov parental needs scale. Nineteen involved professionals answered a questionnaire with open boxes. Parents of children with a variety of chronic skin diseases and young adult patients were interviewed to find out what an optimal approach would look like according to them. Children with a severe chronic and/or congenital skin disorder score high on the "my positive health" questionnaire, indicating they are able to adapt and self-manage. Their highest median score was measured for the dimension "quality of life." Their parents expect improvement of "working with health care professionals," more specifically they want them to adopt a more holistic approach throughout the patient's life. Structured interviews showed they expect that a multidisciplinary team of care providers determine together with the patient and its family-in advance-which care is needed, at what time and by whom. The interviewed professionals indicated adoption of a holistic multidisciplinary approach as the single largest improvement to achieve better care.Conclusion: Although these children with a severe chronic and/or congenital skin disease were able to adapt and self-manage, they need a more personalized integrative multidisciplinary and systematic transmural approach covering all aspects of life during their lifetime. What is Known: • Severe skin disorders affect the child and its family in several ways. In our expert center, we try to optimize the care for these children through a multidisciplinary approach. What is New: • To our knowledge, no English publication describes the requirements for good care for pediatric patients with severe chronic skin disorders and how to optimize this care. We evaluated the health status of children with severe chronic skin disorders and the strengths and weaknesses of past and current care by questioning these children, their parents, adult patients, and involved professionals.


Subject(s)
Quality of Life , Skin Diseases/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Chronic Disease/psychology , Dermatology/standards , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Parents/psychology , Qualitative Research , Quality of Health Care/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires
13.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 99(5): 469-506, 2019 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30931482

ABSTRACT

Pruritus is a frequent symptom in medicine. Population-based studies show that every 5th person in the general population has suffered from chronic pruritus at least once in the lifetime with a 12-month incidence of 7%. In patient populations its frequency is much higher depending on the underlying cause, ranging from around 25% in haemodialysis patients to 100% in skin diseases such as urticaria and atopic dermatitis (AD). Pruritus may be the result of a dermatological or non-dermatological disease. Especially in non-diseased skin it may be caused by systemic, neurological or psychiatric diseases, as well as being a side effect of medications. In a number of cases chronic pruritus may be of multifactorial origin. Pruritus needs a precise diagnostic work-up. Management of chronic pruritus comprises treatment of the underlying disease and topical treatment modalities, including symptomatic antipruritic treatment, ultraviolet phototherapy and systemic treatment. Treating chronic pruritus needs to be targeted, multimodal and performed in a step-wise procedure requiring an interdisciplinary approach. We present the updated and consensus based (S2k) European guideline on chronic pruritus by a team of European pruritus experts from different disciplines. This version is an updated version of the guideline that was published in 2012 and updated in 2014 (www.euroderm.org).


Subject(s)
Dermatology/standards , Pruritus/therapy , Chronic Disease , Europe/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Predictive Value of Tests , Pruritus/diagnosis , Pruritus/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
14.
Am J Clin Dermatol ; 20(4): 571-578, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30993584

ABSTRACT

Mycosis fungoides is the most common form of cutaneous T cell lymphoma. Although normally presenting to physicians at an early stage and with an indolent course, mycosis fungoides can have a varied presentation. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has created guidelines for the treatment and staging of mycosis fungoides. Although comprehensive, in practice these guidelines do not provide specific treatment regimens for lesions located in difficult locations and those recalcitrant to the recommended therapy. Because of this, suggestions based on the practices and decisions made at the multidisciplinary cutaneous lymphoma clinic at the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA, are presented here. Lesions located in areas such as the face and intertriginous zones are often challenging to treat because first-line therapies are often inappropriate, with the locations increasing the possibility of side effects. Additionally, lesions located in the bathing suit distribution are often nonresponsive to first-line therapies for reasons still undetermined. Finally, although well-described, erythroderma secondary to mycosis fungoides is challenging to treat, with controversy surrounding various methods of control. This article both highlights difficult clinical scenarios and reviews the recommended treatment as provided by the NCCN guidelines and provides alternative therapy for lesions that are either difficult to treat because of the location or are recalcitrant to the recommended therapy. With suggestions for the apparent gaps in guidelines, providers can better treat patients who present with more complicated conditions.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Exfoliative/therapy , Mycosis Fungoides/therapy , Skin Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Biopsy , Buttocks , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Dermatitis, Exfoliative/etiology , Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Dermatology/standards , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Face , Female , Humans , Male , Medical Oncology/standards , Middle Aged , Mycosis Fungoides/complications , Mycosis Fungoides/pathology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Skin/drug effects , Skin/pathology , Skin/radiation effects , Skin Neoplasms/complications , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Treatment Outcome , Ultraviolet Therapy/methods
15.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 18(s2): s112-s116, 2019 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30811155

ABSTRACT

Atopic dermatitis affects up to 20% of children and continues to increase in prevalence. Effective disease control is aimed at decreasing symptoms and reducing the frequency of flares, which may be complicated by secondary bacterial infections. Although recent advances have produced a number of non-systemic treatment options, topical corticosteroids remain a fundamental component of treatment algorithms. J Drugs Dermatol. 2019;18(2 Suppl):s112-116.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Coinfection/drug therapy , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Desonide/administration & dosage , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Administration, Cutaneous , Clinical Trials as Topic , Coinfection/microbiology , Critical Pathways/standards , Dermatitis, Atopic/complications , Dermatology/standards , Humans , Treatment Outcome
16.
Am J Clin Dermatol ; 20(3): 315-323, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30707374

ABSTRACT

Metastatic melanoma is a heterogenous disease that has served as a model for the development of both targeted therapy and immunotherapy. KIT-mutated melanoma represents a rare subset, most commonly arising from acral, mucosal, and chronically sun-damaged skin. Additionally, KIT alterations are enriched in the triple wild-type subtype of cutaneous melanoma. Activating alterations of KIT-a transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase important for cell development, growth, and differentiation-have been shown to be critical to oncogenesis across many tumor subtypes. Following the successes of BRAF-targeted therapy in melanoma and KIT-targeted therapy in gastrointestinal stromal tumors, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting KIT have been examined in KIT-mutated melanoma. KIT inhibitors that have been investigated in relevant clinical trials in advanced melanoma include imatinib, sunitinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib. In these studies, selected patients with KIT-mutated melanoma were shown to be responsive to therapy with KIT inhibition, especially patients with L576P and K642E mutations. This has led to the incorporation of KIT-targeted therapy in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for systemic therapy for metastatic or unresectable melanoma. Current research and development efforts include novel KIT-targeted therapies and testing KIT inhibitors in combination with immunotherapy.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinogenesis/genetics , Melanoma/drug therapy , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit/antagonists & inhibitors , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacology , Carcinogenesis/drug effects , Clinical Trials as Topic , Dermatology/standards , Humans , Medical Oncology/standards , Melanoma/genetics , Melanoma/pathology , Molecular Targeted Therapy/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Treatment Outcome
17.
Hautarzt ; 69(10): 801-808, 2018 Oct.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30116831

ABSTRACT

There are diseases that are noticeable for the respective patients, but not visible for all others. And there are skin diseases which, due to their clearly visible location on the skin surface, are often easily recognisable to others. Nevertheless, in recent years dermatology has changed from a traditional optical subject, characterized by clinical observation, to a causal-oriented subject. At ever shorter intervals, new therapeutic options are emerging which present dermatology with a multitude of challenges. This raises questions not only about benefits and effectiveness, but also about financing, self-regulation and the holistic well-being of sick people. The decisive factor in all considerations for and against an innovation or change is the sovereignty over well-founded data on the actual supply situation. Both German dermatological associations, the Professional Association of German Dermatologists (Berufsverband der Deutschen Dermatologen, BVDD) and the German Dermatological Society (Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft, DDG), recognized the need for coordinated scientific research in the field of dermatology healthcare with the establishment of the German Center for Health Services Research in Dermatology (Competenzzentrum Versorgungsforschung in der Dermatologie, CVderm) and had already in 2005 set the course for a long-term positioning of dermatological healthcare research.


Subject(s)
Dermatology , Psoriasis , Skin Neoplasms , Dermatology/standards , Germany , Health Services Research , Humans , Psoriasis/therapy , Quality of Health Care , Skin Neoplasms/therapy
18.
J Dermatol ; 45(7): 755-780, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29687475

ABSTRACT

We established diagnostic criteria and severity classification of localized scleroderma because there is no established diagnostic criteria or widely accepted severity classification of the disease. Also, there has been no clinical guideline for localized scleroderma, so we established its clinical guideline ahead of all over the world. In particular, the clinical guideline was established by clinical questions based on evidence-based medicine according to the New Minds Clinical Practice Guideline Creation Manual (version 1.0). We aimed to make the guideline easy to use and reliable based on the newest evidence, and to present guidance as specific as possible for various clinical problems in treatment of localized scleroderma.


Subject(s)
Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Dermatology/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Scleroderma, Localized/diagnosis , Administration, Cutaneous , Administration, Oral , Dermatologic Agents/standards , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Japan , Phototherapy/standards , Scleroderma, Localized/pathology , Scleroderma, Localized/therapy , Scleroderma, Systemic/diagnosis , Scleroderma, Systemic/pathology , Severity of Illness Index , Skin/pathology , Treatment Outcome
20.
Hautarzt ; 68(2): 120-126, 2017 Feb.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28084498

ABSTRACT

Melasma, also known as chloasma or mask of pregnancy, presents clinically as hyperpigmented skin areas, which develop mostly in the face as a consequence of increased synthesis of melanin. The established treatment options, including topically applied agents and the use of various laser systems, mostly result in improvement but not in complete remission of the lesions. Because of its significant impact on quality of life and the limited effectivity of available treatment options, the management of melasma is challenging for the treating physician. Although many risk factors, including pregnancy and UV exposure, have been identified, the pathogenesis is not yet fully understood. Avoiding solar or artificial UV exposure is of high importance both for the prevention of melasma and for the clinical outcome of existing lesions. In order to avoid vitamin D deficiency, oral vitamin D supplementation should be recommended. In this review, we give an update on clinical aspects, epidemiology, pathogenesis and therapy of melasma and give an outlook on future developments.


Subject(s)
Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Melanosis/diagnosis , Melanosis/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pregnancy Complications/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications/therapy , Dermatology/standards , Dietary Supplements , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Germany , Humans , Medical Oncology/standards , Pregnancy , Treatment Outcome , Vitamin D/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL