Behavior of neuropathy symptom score and neuropathy disability score in patients with and without peripheral diabetic neuropathy: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to stablish cut-off of early diagnosis of diabetic polyneuropathy (PDN) based on neuropathy symptom score (NSS) and neuropathy disability score (NDS); to determine the behavior of NDD and NDS in patients with and without PDN; and to verify the association between clinical and demographic variables with both tests. METHODS: This retrospective cohort included 86 patients with diabetes. The NSS and NDS evaluations were collected in medical records in two moments: initial (entry into service) and final (after three years). Individuals were categorized in three groups: G1- PDN in both evaluations (N = 27); G2- PDN only in the final evaluation (N = 16); G3-individuals without PDN (N = 43). A ROC curve was performed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of NSS and NDS for PDN diagnosis. ANOVA was used to compare NSS and NDS between groups and evaluations, and multiple regression was performed to find predictors of PDN. RESULTS: The NSS and NDS showed excellent sensitivity and specificity (NDS ≥1.5 and NSS ≥6.5) for PDN diagnosis. There was a significant difference between groups in initial (p = 0.000) and final (p = 0.000) NDS and NSS evaluations. There was an association between peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and increase in NSS (p = 0.024) in G2; and association between loss of protective sensation (LOPS) and increase in NSS in G3 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: NSS and NDS tests showed excellent sensitivity and specificity for early PDN diagnosis. Behavior of both tests can differ patients with and without PDN. Furthermore, PAD and LOPS can be a predictor of PDN evolution.

Back Pain and Body Posture Evaluation Instrument for Adults (BackPEI-A): Updating and an online application.

INTRODUCTION: Back Pain and Body Posture Evaluation Instrument for Adults (BackPEI-A) lags the most recent literature, as it does not assess issues related to activity increasingly present in the daily lives of people of all ages. PURPOSE: (1) to update the BackPEI-A by including four new questions regarding the use of mobile devices; (2) to present a new graphic design of the issues related to back and neck pain to facilitate understanding of the location of these pains; (3) to test the content validity and the reliability of the new questions; and (4) to identify whether the BackPEI-A version in online form has adequate reliability. METHODS: The content validation by evaluation of eight experts, and the reliability of the new questions and of the online version were assessed. The new questions were translated to English. Content validation was assessed by the content validity index (CVI). Reliability was assessed using the agreement percentage (%C), the kappa statistic (k), and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). k > 0.4 and %C > 0.5 were assumed to include new questions. RESULTS: The new questions showed good agreement among the experts, k > 0.4 and %C > 0.5. Both forms applied presented an average kappa of total sample ranging from moderate to good, and moderate ICC values, showing an adequate reliability. CONCLUSION: The updated BackPEI-A is valid and reliable and allows the identification of aspects related to back and neck pain, as well as possible risk factors.

Occupational Performance 1 Year After a Distal Radius Fracture From the Perspective of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.

IMPORTANCE: Distal radius fractures (DRFs) frequently compromise independent functioning. OBJECTIVE: To analyze occupational performance post-DRF using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) and related interviews, guided by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). COPM score was compared with standard metrics: Patient-Reported Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and Participation Behavior Questionnaire (PBQ). METHOD: Through a semistructured COPM interview, participants highlighted self-care, productivity, and leisure. They completed the PRWE and PBQ, linking results to ICF sets. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING: Outpatient hand surgery clinic at a trauma center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N = 120), 1 yr post-DRF. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Incorporated COPM, PRWE, and PBQ, linked to ICF. RESULTS: Analysis identified 73 codes, aligning with 30 ICF Hand Conditions codes. Main concerns related to self-care (15.21%), leisure (12.16%), and productivity (16.22%). Major challenges pertained to domestic (67.00%) and civic life (64.53%) within ICF. Occupational performance was positively correlated with participation (r = .62) and inversely with disability (r = -.62). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: DRFs result in varied occupational challenges that are not always reflected in standard measures. The COPM offers a comprehensive insight into post-DRF patient challenges, emphasizing the value of diverse clinical assessment approaches. What This Article Adds: This study highlights the importance of a holistic approach in occupational therapy for DRF patients, revealing that standard measurements might overlook key challenges that they face. By adopting broader evaluative methods, occupational therapists can better address patient-specific needs and enhance their rehabilitation outcomes.

Development and validation of a WHO ICF compliant hand and upper limb assessment tool for children: The Reach Out questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Current tools for evaluating hand and upper limb function in children do not represent all domains of the World Health Organization International Classification of Disability, Functioning and Health (ICF) framework and may not capture an accurate progression or regression of function over time. PURPOSE: Based on this framework, we have developed an assessment tool (Reach Out) to evaluate function in children aged from 2 to 16 years following consultation with an advisory panel of specialists. STUDY DESIGN: Primary clinical study. METHODS: Construct validity along with test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability and sensitivity to change have all been analyzed to validate the Reach Out assessment tool. RESULTS: The assessment tool has been validated in a total of 231 patients. Significant construct validity of 0.64 (P < .00001, 95% confidence interval = 0.56-0.71, n = 231) for both age groups and diagnostic groups was observed. The Reach Out questionnaire was internally consistent with a Cronbach's Alpha of > 0.8 for most domains in most age groups. Test re-retest scores showed that the questionnaire was reliable with most domains of the questionnaire achieving high scores of reliability (P ≤ .03). We also received positive feedback from participants and parents. CONCLUSIONS: The use of this new tool will help identify both progression and regression of function, allowing a more tailored and holistic approach to treatment in children with conditions affecting the hand and upper limb through the incorporation of International Classification of Disability, Functioning and Health domains. This tool is quicker to complete and can be applied to a wide range of ages and diagnostic groups compared to previous assessment tools.

Effect of osteopathic visceral manipulation for individuals with functional constipation and chronic nonspecific low back pain: Randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of osteopathic visceral manipulation (OVM) on disability and pain intensity in individuals with functional constipation and chronic nonspecific low back pain. METHODS: This study is a randomized controlled trial with a blinded assessor. Seventy-six volunteers with functional constipation and chronic nonspecific low back pain were randomized to two groups: OVM and sham OVM. The primary clinical outcome was pain intensity measured using a numeric rating scale (NRS) and disability measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The secondary outcomes were electromyographic signals measured during the flexion-extension cycle, the finger-to-floor distance during complete flexion of the trunk and the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). All outcomes were determined after six weeks of treatment as well as three months after randomization. RESULTS: The OVM group reported a reduction in pain intensity after six weeks of treatment and at the three-month evaluation (p < .0002) and the sham group reported a reduction in pain intensity after three-month evaluation (p < .007). For the ODI was also found in the OVM group six weeks after the end of treatment (treatment effect = -6.59, 95% CI: -12.01 to -1.17, p = .01) and at the three-month evaluation (treatment effect = -6.02, 95% CI: -11.55 to -0.49, p = .03). Significant differences were also found for paravertebral muscle activity during the dynamic phases (flexion and extension) six-week evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: The OVM group demonstrated a reduction in pain intensity and improvement in disability after six-weeks and three-month follow-up while the sham group reduction in pain three-month follow-up.

The Effects of Brief Guided Imagery on Patients Suffering From Chronic Back Pain: An A-B Design Study.

BACKGROUND: Guided imagery (GI) is a non-pharmacological method used to reduce pain, stress, and anxiety. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of brief GI on symptoms of chronic back pain in adults treated in the Rheumatology clinic. DESIGN: A-B design study. SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 35 women with chronic back pain were recruited at the Rheumatology Outpatient Clinic of Barzilai Medical Center in Ashkelon, Israel. METHODS: All subjects completed questionnaires at recruitment (T1), and after 8-10 weeks, they completed questionnaires again before the first intervention (T2). The intervention included five brief GI group meetings every 2-3 weeks, one hour each (3-5 subjects per group). Participants learned 6 GI exercises and were asked to practice brief guided imagery exercises at least once daily. Then, questionnaires were completed the third time (T3). OUTCOME MEASURES: MOQ - Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, STAI - State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, FABQ - Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, NPRS - Numerical Pain Rating Scale (average pain over the last week). RESULTS: Compared with the period without intervention, NPRS (Δ = 2.53, standard error [SE] = 0.43, p < .001), STAI (Δ = 8.41, SE = 1.95, p < .001), and MOQ (Δ = 0.06, SE = 0.02, p = .019) reported significantly lower levels after brief guided imagery training. However, no statistically significant change was found in FABQ. CONCLUSIONS: The brief guided imagery intervention may help alleviate chronic back pain, help decrease anxiety, and improve daily activity in women who suffer from chronic low back pain.

Developing an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set for Pediatric Brain Tumor Survivors in Chinese Clinical Settings.

BACKGROUND: The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) core set (CS) facilitates the standardization of functioning and impairment assessment for integration of holistic care. OBJECTIVE: This study developed an ICF CS for interviewing pediatric brain tumor survivors in Taiwan to help healthcare professionals in implementing disability assessment and management measures. METHODS: A group of 29 experts in 10 relevant fields with at least 5 years of experience working with children with brain tumors participated in this study. The first questionnaire contained 247 second-level ICF categories. The experts rated the significance of each category by using a 5-point Likert scale. Correlations between individual and group scores were calculated to determine consensus. Categories with an average rating of higher than 4 and for which greater than or equal to 80% (23) of the participants provided a rating of 4 or higher were included in the final CS. RESULTS: The final CS contained a total of 57 ICF categories: 20 from the Body Functions and Structures component, 36 from the Activities and Participation component, and 1 from the Environmental Factors component. CONCLUSION: The ICF CS for pediatric brain tumor survivors provides a framework for relevant healthcare professionals to deliver patient-centered care, ensuring that services focus on all areas of development. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Patient ratings for this ICF CS may serve as a new practical and effective patient-reported information tool for acquiring patient input and for the systematic monitoring of pediatric brain tumor survivors in clinical practice. Further research should be conducted on this CS to verify our findings.

Identifying and linking prosthetic outcomes to the ICF framework: a step to inform the benefits measured in prosthetic health economic evaluations.

PURPOSE: Prosthetic research seems focused on measuring gait-related outcomes that may not adequately measure real-world benefits of prosthetic interventions. Systematically cataloguing a comprehensive range of outcomes is an important steppingstone towards developing a holistic way to measure the benefits of prosthetic interventions for future health economic evaluations. The purpose of this research was to identify and catalogue the outcomes measured in lower-limb prosthetic research using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework and a custom clinical framework, and thereby describe the existing research focus and identify evidence gaps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A structured literature search identified systematic reviews of lower-limb prosthetic interventions. Reported outcomes were extracted from included studies and linked to the ICF- and clinical-frameworks. RESULTS: Of the 1297 extracted outcomes, 1060 were linked to the ICF framework. Most outcomes linked to second- (63.8%) or third-level categories (33.4%), such as Gait Pattern Functions (b770, 49.8%). Most of these outcomes (31.2%) describe temporospatial, kinematic or kinetic gait measures as categorised by the clinical framework. CONCLUSIONS: Lower-limb prosthetic research is focused on laboratory-based measures of gait. There are evidence gaps describing participation in real-world activities - important outcomes to inform policy and investment decisions that determine the prosthetic interventions available for people with limb-loss.Implications for rehabilitationCataloguing the outcomes used in prosthetic research to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) allows important evidence gaps to be illuminated given the holistic description of function and disability.Establishing a comprehensive list of prosthetic outcomes, described using an internationally recognised framework with unified and consistent language, is an important steppingstone towards developing a core outcome set (COS) for prosthetic interventions and informing the benefits measured in future prosthetic health economic evaluations (HEEs).Being able to measure the benefits of a prosthesis that are most important to prosthesis users and funders has potential to fundamentally change future HEEs that influence funding policies, and ultimately the prostheses made available to people living with limb-loss.

Clinical application and feasibility of utilizing the PEDI-CAT to assess activity and participation among children receiving physical therapy incorporating hippotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Hippotherapy (HPOT) is a physical therapy (PT) treatment tool using equine movement to improve mobility for children with movement impairments. Although research suggests HPOT improves body structure and function, there is limited evidence regarding its impact on activity and participation outcomes in a clinical setting. The Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adaptive Test (PEDI-CAT) may be useful in HPOT settings to highlight changes in activity and participation. PURPOSE: 1) Evaluate the PEDI-CAT's sensitivity to changes in activity and participation among children receiving PT using HPOT; 2) determine feasibility of administering the PEDI-CAT in a HPOT setting; and 3) examine how PEDI-CAT scores influence clinical decision-making. METHODS: Participants (N = 34) were children who attended weekly PT using HPOT for 6 months. The PEDI-CAT was completed for all participants by a parent or caregiver at initial treatment (T1) and 6 months later (T2). A linear mixed effects model was used to evaluate changes in scores over time. Team meetings occurred monthly to discuss how PEDI-CAT scores impacted treatment. RESULTS: There were significant improvements across 3 PEDI-CAT domains between T1 and T2 for all children with small effect sizes and nonsignificant changes noted within two diagnostic subgroups with small-to-medium effect sizes. The PEDI-CAT was completed by all participants without interrupting treatment flow. PEDI-CAT score reports enriched therapist-client conversations increasing shared decision-making. CONCLUSION: PTs who treat children using HPOT may feasibly use the PEDI-CAT to assess changes in activity level outcomes and to assist clinical decision-making.

[Holistic semi-presential evaluation of oropharygeal dysphagia with the framework of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Optimizing evaluation to improve rehabilitation treatment]. / Evaluación holística semipresencial de la disfagia orofaríngea en el marco de la Clasificación Internacional del Funcionamiento, de la Discapacidad y de la Salud: optimizar la valoración para mejorar el tratamiento rehabilitador.

INTRODUCTION: Oropharyngeal dysphagia can lead to medical complications and decreased quality of life. Although there is a wide diversity of instrumental and clinical procedures to assess it, consensus for its holistic evaluation is scarce and poorly defined. The objective of this article is to present the design of a model for the holistic examination of oropharyngeal dysphagia that takes into account the components of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and that can be carried out both face to face and semi-presentially using Information and Communication Technology (ICT) tools. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A non-systematic review of the literature is carried out in order to select validated oropharyngeal dysphagia assessment tools with the highest degree of recommendation. These tools are analyzed by a group of experts in oropharyngeal dysphagia from the Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau in Barcelona to design a holistic exploration model. RESULTS: This evaluation model includes an assessment at the beginning and at the end of the treatment, as well as continuous monitoring during the rehabilitation process. It is implemented in a semi-presential and multidisciplinary way, and its purpose is to understand oropharyngeal dysphagia holistically to design and monitor an individualized therapeutic plan. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of oropharyngeal dysphagia should be within the biopsychosocial framework proposed by the ICF. The application of ICT in blended interventions facilitates this.

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric properties of the Urdu version of Rand Short Form 36-item survey (SF-36) among patients with lumbar radiculopathy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although Rand Short Form 36-item (SF-36) questionnaire is a frequently used tool for evaluating a patient's quality of life in both clinical and research settings, but its translation into Urdu language and its psychometric properties has not been tested before, in accordance to the pre-established guidelines. This study aimed to translate and assess the psychometric properties of Urdu version of SF-36 (SF-36-U) in lumbar radiculopathy patients. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, one hundred and eight patients of lumbar radiculopathy filled SF-36-U questionnaire, Urdu version of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI-U) and visual analogue scales for pain (VAS pain) at baseline and after 7 days. Two types of reliability i.e. internal consistency and test-retest reliability while three types of validity i.e. face, content, and construct validity were evaluated. Psychometric properties were assessed contrary to the a priori hypothesis and alpha level was kept at < 0.05. RESULTS: SF-36-U presented good to excellent test-retest reliability for all eight domains (ICC2,1 = 0.75-0.92). Internal consistency was also acceptable for all domains (Cronbach's alpha = 0.73-0.90). Face and content validity were found to be good. Pearson correlation revealed moderate to strong correlations of SF-36-U domains with ODI-U (r = 0.43-0.54), VAS pain (r = 0.32-0.49) and each of its own question (r = 0.37-0.88) which shows good construct validity. CONCLUSION: SF-36-U revealed acceptable psychometric properties and is considered as a reliable and valid questionnaire for assessing the health-related quality of life in Urdu-speaking patients having lumbar radiculopathy.

Convergent and Discriminative Validity of the PROMIS Physical Function 4 Questionnaire for Assessing Pain-related Disability in Low Back Pain Patients Seeking Chiropractic Care.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To investigate construct validity by examining the convergent and discriminative validity of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function 4a (PROMIS-PF4) questionnaire in low back pain (LBP) patients seeking care from Danish chiropractors. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) is often used to assess physical functioning in LBP. However, it consists of 24 items, which is time consuming to complete in clinical practice. The PROMIS-PF4 questionnaire has only four items and may be more applicable for clinical use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with LBP seeking care from chiropractors in Denmark completed the PROMIS-PF4, RMDQ, Subgroups for Targeted Treatment (STarT) Back screening tool, and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) in advance of their first appointment with the chiropractor. Convergent validity was assessed using Spearman correlation coefficients between the PROMIS-PF4 and RMDQ and NPRS, respectively. Discriminative validity of the PROMIS-PF4 was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) when plotting the PROMIS-PF4 t score against a reference case for RMDQ; NPRS; and high and low risk groups using the STarT Back screening tool. RESULTS: Among 356 patients the PROMIS-PF4 questionnaire had strong convergent validity with the RMDQ ( r =-0.76) and moderate convergent validity with the NPRS ( r =-0.42). The PROMIS-PF4 had good and acceptable discriminative validity for disability (AUC=0.88) and high risk of persisting disability (AUC=0.72), and poor or no discriminative validity for pain intensity (AUC=0.66) and low-risk of persisting disability (AUC=0.26), respectively. CONCLUSION: As hypothesized, for convergent validity the PROMIS-PF4 has stronger correlation with the RMDQ than the NPRS and good discriminative validity for identifying patients with pain-related disability and at high risk of persisting disability but not for identifying pain intensity or low-risk of persisting disability. Consequently, the PROMIS-PF4 has adequate construct validity for measuring pain-related disability in an LBP population in chiropractic care.

Association of Functional Disability and Biopsychosocial Factors in Older Adults With Low Back Pain Who Live in the Amazonas State Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify social and clinical factors associated with levels of functional disability (FD) in older adults with low back pain (LBP) in the city of Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 557 adults with LBP aged ≥60 years was completed. Sociodemographic and clinical features, pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale), FD (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire), physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire-short version), body mass index, educational level, health perception, emotional level, and self-reported diseases were evaluated. Statistical analysis was used to verify the association between quantitative variables and a group; Student t test or Mann-Whitney test, and analysis of variance (normality assumption) or Kruskal-Wallis test (non-parametric), P value of less than .05. RESULTS: There were 81.3% female participants, 54.9% self-reported their race and/or skin color as brown, and 37.8% were sedentary. Pain intensity scores were 6.26 ± 2.19 in female participants and 5.82 ± 1.84 in male participants. Mean FD scores were 11.68 ± 6.08 for female participants and 9.61 ± 5.76 for males participants, although 39.7% of the total group presented with severe disability (score ≥14) and FD was associated with female sex (P = .001), physical activity (P≤ 0.001), body mass index (P≤ .001), emotional level (P < .001), and health perception (P < .001). CONCLUSION: In this group of older adults with LBP, FD was associated with female sex, level of physical activity, body mass index, emotional level, and health perception. Many factors that were identified with FD are modifiable; therefore, interventions, such as nutrition education and re-conceptualization of self-emotional and health perception, may have potential to help in preventing and reducing FD.

Less time spent walking and depressive symptoms are associated with more self-perceived disability in primary care patients: a cross-sectional study from Uganda.

Introduction: evidence on associations between self-perceived disability and physical activity levels in primary care patients (PCP) in low-income countries is absent. We investigated whether self-perceived disability is associated with physical activity levels while taking into account relevant demographic, social, mental and health parameters and other lifestyle factors in PCP in Uganda. Methods: in this cross-sectional study, patients from two primary care centers in a farming community in central Uganda completed the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2 (WHODAS 2), Simple Physical Activity Questionnaire (SIMPAQ), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, and Multidimensional Scale for Perceived Social Support. Somatic co-morbidity and multimorbidity were self-reported or retrieved from medical files. A backward linear regression was performed in order to explain the variance in WHODAS 2 total scores. Results: in 130 PCP [median (interquartile range) age=47.0 (22.0); 73.1% (n=95) female], older age, less time spent walking (SIMPAQ) and more severe depressive symptoms (PHQ-9) were independent significant predictors of more self-perceived disability (WHODAS 2). The final model explained 44.2% of the variance in WDODAS 2 scores. Conclusion: our study demonstrates that self-perceived disability in PCP living in low-resourced settings is associated with older age, physical inactivity and depressive symptoms. Future lifestyle studies in primary care settings should consider targeting both physical and mental health outcomes in order to reduce self-perceived disability in PCP, in particular in older patients.

Beliefs about back pain and associations with clinical outcomes: a primary care cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate associations between beliefs about low back pain (LBP) at baseline and pain intensity and disability at 2-week, 13-week and 52-week follow-up. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: Primary care private chiropractic clinics in Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2734 adults consulting a chiropractor for a new episode of LBP, with follow-up data available from 71%, 61% and 52% of the participants at 2, 13 and 52 weeks, respectively. OUTCOME MEASURES: Beliefs about LBP were measured by the Back Belief Questionnaire (BBQ) before consulting the chiropractor. Pain (Numerical Rating Scale 0-10) and disability (the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire) were measured at baseline and after 2, 13 and 52 weeks. Associations were explored using longitudinal linear mixed models estimating interactions between BBQ and time, and by estimating associations between single items of BBQ and 13-week outcomes. RESULTS: More positive beliefs about LBP were weakly associated with a reduction in pain at 2 weeks (ß interaction BBQ#Time=-0.02 (95% CI -0.04 to -0.001)), at 13 weeks (-0.03 (95% CI -0.05 to -0.01)) and at 52 weeks of follow-up (-0.03 (95% CI -0.05 to -0.01); p=0.003). For disability, the association was uncertain (p=0.7). The item 'Back trouble means periods of pain for the rest of one's life' had the strongest association with both reduction in pain (-0.29, 95% CI -0.4 to -0.19, p<0.001) and disability (-2.42, 95% CI -3.52 to -1.33, p<0.001) at 13-week follow-up. CONCLUSION: Positive beliefs regarding LBP, measured by the BBQ, were associated with a reduction in pain intensity at both short-term and long-term follow-up. However, the association was weak, and the clinical relevance is therefore questionable. No clear association was demonstrated between beliefs and disability. This study did not show promise that back beliefs as measured by the BBQ were helpful for predicting or explaining the course of LBP in this setting.

Epidemiology and risk factors for sleep disturbances in children and youth with cerebral palsy: An ICF-based approach.

OBJECTIVES AND BACKGROUND: Children with cerebral palsy are at risk for sleep disorders, and there is a complex relationship between sleep and physical, environmental and functional factors in such children. The WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health model serves as a universal framework for describing and organizing functioning and disability. This study aimed to describe sleep disturbances in Singaporean children and youth with cerebral palsy, and develop a holistic framework for evaluating risk factors and potential management strategies for poor sleep. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 151 children and youth in a nationwide registry for cerebral palsy. The WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health for Cerebral Palsy Questionnaire was used to identify sleep disturbances. Risk factors analyzed were age, gender, ethnic background, financial assistance, the dominant motor feature of cerebral palsy, functional status, and comorbidities such as active epilepsy, hearing and visual impairments, generalized pain, muscle tone and involuntary contractions. RESULTS: 46% had difficulty with sleep, with similar proportions having difficulty with amount, onset, maintenance and quality of sleep. On multivariate regression analysis, higher functional gross motor impairment as indicated by a GMFCS level of V (adjusted OR 4.24; 95% CI 1.09-19.0) and difficulty with involuntary contractions (aOR 2.80; 1.20-6.71) were significant factors for sleep difficulties. CONCLUSION: An ICF-based framework was useful in identifying possible contributory factors and strategies for managing poor sleep. Further studies with objective sleep measures would allow for better characterization of sleep disturbances in children and youth with cerebral palsy, and guide management.

Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index, and Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: Which Has Superior Measurement Properties in Older Adults With Low Back Pain?

OBJECTIVE: To examine the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of 3 commonly used questionnaires for assessing physical function (ie, Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale [QBPDS], and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire [RMDQ]) in older patients undergoing chiropractic care for low back pain (LBP). DESIGN: Head-to-head clinimetric comparison. METHODS: Patients completed the ODI, QBPDS, and RMDQ at baseline and after 2 weeks of treatment. Reliability was evaluated for internal consistency (Cronbach α), test-retest reliability (interclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), and measurement error (standard error of measurement and smallest detectable change [SDC]). Structural validity was evaluated through unidimensional confirmatory factor analysis, and construct validity was investigated by a priori hypotheses with other measures. Responsiveness was evaluated by testing a priori hypotheses using data at baseline and at 2-week follow-up. RESULTS: Two hundred fourteen patients (53% males and 47% females) with a mean age of 66.2 years (standard deviation = 7.8 years) were included, of which 193 patients completed the 2-week follow-up for our responsiveness analysis. The RMDQ, ODI, and QBPDS showed sufficient internal consistency (Cronbach α of .89, .86, and .94, respectively) and test-retest reliability (ICC[2,1] of 0.85, 0.89, and 0.84, respectively). The SDC for the RMDQ was 6.9, for the ODI was 19.1, and for the QBPDS was 23.6, which are values larger than the minimal important change. None of the measures met all criteria for sufficient structural validity, but the RMDQ and ODI exhibited a partial unidimensional fit. The questionnaires had sufficient construct validity and responsiveness. CONCLUSION: The ODI, QBPDS, and RMDQ have similar measurement properties in older adults with LBP. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2022;52(7):457-469. Epub: 18 May 2022. doi:10.2519/jospt.2022.10802.

Measuring Equine-Assisted Therapy: Validation and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of an ICF-Based Standardized Assessment-Tool.

The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) of the World Health Organization (WHO) was established as an international framework for monitoring rehabilitation outcomes and the impacts of health interventions since, as the term "functioning" implies, it emphasizes a person's "lived health" in addition to their biological health status. Equine-assisted therapy (EAT) represents a holistic intervention approach that aims to improve both biomedical functioning and the patient's lived health in relation to performing activities and participating in social situations. In this study, the psychometric properties of an ICF-based digital assessment tool for the measurement of the rehabilitation impacts of EAT were analyzed via simultaneous confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) and reliability and sensitivity tests. In total, 265 patients from equine-assisted therapy centers in Germany were included for CFA. Change sensitivity was assessed via multi-level analyses based on 876 repeated assessments by 30 therapists. Results show satisfactory model-fit statistics; McDonald's omega (ML) showed excellent scores for the total scale (ω = 0.96) and three subscales (ω = 0.95; ω = 0.95, ω = 0.93). The tool proved itself to be change sensitive and reliable (change sensitivity p ≤ 0.001), retest r = 0.745 **, p ≤ 0.001). Overall, the developed assessment tool satisfactorily fulfills psychometric requirements and can be applied in therapeutic practice.