The transesophageal echo probe may contribute to esophageal injury after catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation under general anesthesia: a preliminary observation.

INTRODUCTION: The transesophageal echo probe (TEE) is commonly used before and during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation under general anesthesia (GA). We sought to determine the potential contribution of the TEE probe to esophageal injury after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone for paroxysmal AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-six patients undergoing PVI with TEE, PVI/TEE, 16 undergoing PVI without TEE (PVI/No TEE), and 27 undergoing TEE without any left atrial ablation (TEE/No LA ablation) under GA were included. Posterior wall ablation was power (20-25 W) and time limited (electrogram attenuation or ≤30 s). Esophageal capsule endoscopy (n = 206) was performed pre- and post-procedure and at 2 weeks. Esophageal lesions were seen in 30% of PVI/TEE, 0% of patients in the PVI/No TEE (P = 0.009), and 22% of TEE/No LA ablation groups (P = 0.47 vs. PVI/TEE). There were no instances of esophageal bleeding, perforation, or need for gastrointestinal intervention. Self-resolving dysphagia was the only reported symptom (5%). All lesions healed within 2 weeks. There was no significant difference in the location or morphological appearance of esophageal lesions seen in the PVI/TEE versus TEE/No LA ablation groups. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal lesions were seen in 30% of patients undergoing PVI alone under GA with use of TEE and in a similar proportion (22%) of patients undergoing TEE in the absence of left atrial ablation. This study makes the preliminary observation that one must be cognizant of the TEE probe as a potential contributor to esophageal injury after AF ablation. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

First experience with microprobe transoesophageal echocardiography in non-sedated adults undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation: feasibility study and comparison with intracardiac echocardiography.

AIMS: Imaging of the left atrium (LA) is mandatory during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and may be achieved by echocardiography. The aim of the present study was to assess the feasibility of using a recently released transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) microprobe (micro-TEE) in non-sedated adult patients undergoing AF ablation and to directly compare this new technique with intracardiac echocardiography (ICE). METHODS AND RESULTS: The study group consisted of 12 consecutive patients (8 males, mean age 49 ± 14 years) who underwent first radiofrequency AF ablation. All patients underwent standard TEE, computed tomography, intraprocedural micro-TEE, and ICE. The easiness of introducing the microprobe in the supine position in non-sedated patients in the electrophysiology laboratory, its tolerability, and quality of obtained images were assessed using a five-point scale. There were no problems with microprobe introduction and obtaining images for a mean of 54 ± 17 min. The microprobe was significantly better tolerated than the standard TEE probe (4.3 ± 0.5 vs. 3.4 ± 0.6 points, P < 0.01). The micro-TEE was scored as significantly better than ICE in the assessment of the LA and LA appendage (LAA) anatomy and function. Both techniques were very useful in guiding transseptal puncture, although micro-TEE images were ranked higher by an echocardiographer than by an electrophysiologist (tenting 4.8 ± 0.6 vs. 4.0 ± 0.6 points, P < 0.01), whereas ICE images were ranked equally excellent by both observers. CONCLUSION: In non-sedated patients undergoing AF ablation, the micro-TEE can be used for the assessment of the LA, LAA, and pulmonary veins anatomy as well as the guidance of transseptal puncture.

Feasibility of transesophageal echocardiography with a ten-French monoplane probe.

OBJECTIVES: We examined the feasibility of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) using a 10F monoplane probe developed for intracardiac ultrasound (AcuNav, Acuson/Siemens, Mountain View, Calif). BACKGROUND: Traditional TEE uses a 10- to 12-mm-diameter probe, and conscious sedation is customary to minimize patient discomfort. Because of its small size (3.2-mm diameter), the 10F monoplane probe can be inserted into the esophagus using only topical anesthesia. This provides the potential for a more easily tolerated examination. METHODS: A total of 20 patients underwent a comprehensive TEE using an adult multiplane probe. Immediately afterward, the 10F monoplane probe was inserted into the esophagus and a targeted examination completed. The 10F monoplane studies were blindly reviewed by 3 observers for the study indication and for 16 diagnostic elements. These were graded against an expert's review of standard TEE. RESULTS: The 10F monoplane probe was well tolerated in all patients. Observers A, B, and C answered the clinical question in 80%, 85%, and 100%, respectively, with the 10F probe. The percentage of clinical elements deemed evaluable was 71%, 78%, and 80%, respectively. Limitations included incomplete visualization of the mitral valve and a systematic underestimation of the severity of valve regurgitation. CONCLUSIONS: The 10F monoplane probe is safe, well-tolerated, and capable of evaluating many clinical questions. Because of its small size, conscious sedation may not be necessary. It may be useful for targeted evaluations, for monitoring invasive procedures, or for intermediate or long-term monitoring in an intensive care department.

Transnasal transesophageal echocardiography: a modified application mode for cardiac examination in ventilated patients.

UNLABELLED: In 42 endotracheally intubated patients, we examined the utility of a miniaturized monoplane probe for transnasal transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Transnasal TEE was prospectively evaluated in 26 deeply and 16 mildly sedated patients receiving topical anesthesia with lidocaine jelly 2%. The patients with deep sedation were additionally examined with transoral monoplane and multiplane TEE. Transnasal esophageal insertion of the TEE probe was successfully performed in 90% of patients. Endotracheal malpositioning was corrected in two patients. Nasal bleeding required treatment in another patient. Topical anesthesia was adequate in 82% of mildly sedated patients. Left ventricular short- and four-chamber long-axis views of good quality were obtained with transnasal (transoral) monoplane TEE in 76% (81%) and 92% (96%) of patients (differences not significant). Compared with conventional multiplane TEE, transnasal monoplane TEE missed diagnoses in 19% of patients. The relative error (mean +/- SEM) of quantification with transnasal TEE was <9% +/- 2% for ventricular diameters and <7% +/- 2% for cross-sectional area measurements, with a bias of 0.5 +/- 3.8 cm2 and 0.1 +/- 2.4 cm2 (mean +/- 2 SD) for left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic short-axis areas. The relative error in measuring intracardiac flow velocities was >40%, but systolic to diastolic peak velocity ratios at the valvular site were determined with an error <4% +/- 3%. Transnasal monoplane TEE can be performed even in mildly sedated patients with an endotracheal tube without further need for analgesia or sedation. The technique is as useful as conventional transoral TEE to image standard tomographic planes for quantification, but it is less suited for comprehensive echocardiographic diagnosing. IMPLICATIONS: Transnasal insertion of a miniaturized monoplane transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) probe was studied in endotracheally intubated patients. Nasal passage was well tolerated even by patients with only mild sedation. Imaging quality was similar to conventional transoral monoplane TEE with larger transducers, but technical restraints cause a deficit in complete cardiac diagnosing obtained with multiplane TEE.

Ecocardiografía transesofágica en niños / Transesophageal echocardiography in children

Objetivo: describir una muestra preliminar de ecocardiogramas realizados en niños con dos tipos de patología: endocarditis infecciosa (EI) y cardiopatías congénitas (CC), en quienes se compararan los informe obtenidos de dos métodos, ecoradiograma transtorácico (ETT) y ecocardiograma transesofágico (ETE) y se correlacionan con datos del diagnóstico de certeza obtenido por cateterismo cardiaco, por cirugía o por ambos. Material y métodos: se estudiaron 42 niños, cuya edad varió de un día a cuatro años. Se dividieron en dos grupos: Grupo I, 15 pacientes con diagnóstico clínico presunto de EI. El Grupo II, 27 pacientes con diagnóstico de CC. El diagnóstico de certeza para el grupo I se apoyó en datos clínicos, ecoardiograma y hemocultivos. En el grupo II, en alguno o varios de los siguientes métodos: cateterismo cardiaco, angiografía o cirugía. Resultados: en el grupo I, fueron 15 pacientes cuyas edades fluctuaron entre 43 días y cuatro años (media de 17.8 meses). No predominó un sexo. El peso varió ente 2,215 g y 14 kg. El diagnóstico de EI se apoyó en la presencia de fiebre en estudio y el antecedente de haber teido instalado un catéter endovenoso para administración de líquidos, de medicamentos, o de ambos. El dato para sustenta el diagnóstico de EI con el ETE fue la presencia de masas intracardiacas en distinto sitios que se interpretaron como vegetaciones y que se vieron en 8/15 casos. En el grupo II, hubo 27 pacientes con diversas CC de las cuales se cateterizaron 24/27. En ambos grupos se realizaron los dos tipos de ecocardiograma: ETT y ETE. Conclusión: la facilidad de registrar imágenes en forma biplanar, permite al ETE viasualizar áreas que no son accesibles en con ETT. Por esta razón entre otras, algunos investigadores insisten en que se recurra al ETE siempre que sea posible