Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 55
Filter
Add more filters

Complementary Medicines
Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 76(3): e1484-e1491, 2023 02 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35686318

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Molecular analysis (MA) on heart valve (HV) improves the microbiologic diagnosis of infectious endocarditis (IE). The main drawback of MA is the lack of antimicrobial susceptibility information. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort observational study of consecutive adult patients from April 2012 to May 2021 who underwent valve surgery at our hospital. The performance of MA, blood cultures (BC) and valve cultures (VC), and the diagnostic and therapeutic impact of MA were evaluated. Molecular antibiogram results were compared to culture-based antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). RESULTS: A total of 137 patients with definite IE and 52 patients with no IE were enrolled in the study. Among IE cases BC, VC, and MA were positive in 75 (55%), 30 (22%), and 120 (88%) of IE cases, respectively. Among 62 cases of BC-negative IE (BCNE), 57 achieved diagnosis with MA. MA led to a change of antimicrobial therapy in 92% of BCNE. MA was negative in 100% of patients with no IE. Molecular antibiogram performed on 17 valve specimens that resulted positive for pathogens potential carrier of genes encoding for multidrug resistant mechanisms showed 100% concordance with AST. CONCLUSIONS: MA showed a high specificity and sensitivity in etiological diagnosis of IE. Molecular antibiogram could overcome the major limitation of MA that is the lack of susceptibility testing. We advocate for the inclusion of MA among diagnostic criteria for IE and for a more extensive use of molecular antibiogram when the culture result is negative, and MA is the only positive test.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Endocarditis, Bacterial , Endocarditis , Adult , Humans , Prospective Studies , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Endocarditis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Endocarditis, Bacterial/microbiology , Endocarditis/diagnosis , Endocarditis/drug therapy , Endocarditis/microbiology , DNA/therapeutic use , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
2.
Int J Infect Dis ; 102: 584-589, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33157289

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We describe our multicenter experience on diagnosis and management of Aerococcus bacteremia including the susceptibility profile of Aerococcus species and a suggested algorithm for clinicians. METHODS: Retrospective study of all patients with positive blood cultures for Aerococcus species from January 2005 to July 2020 in our institution with clinical data and susceptibility profile. Data were collected from both electronic health record and clinical microbiology laboratory database. RESULTS: There were 219 unique isolates with only the susceptibility profiles available, while 81 patients had clinical information available. Forty-nine of those cases were deemed as true bloodstream infection and the rest were of unclear clinical significance. Cases of endocarditis (n = 7) were high-grade, monomicrobial bacteremia caused by Aerococcus urinae. Patients with endocarditis were younger (66 vs 80 p < 0.05). The risk for endocarditis was higher if duration of symptoms was longer than 7 days (OR 105, 95% CI: 5-2271), or if there were septic emboli (OR 71, 95% CI: 3-1612). A DENOVA score cutoff of ≥ 3 was 100% sensitive and 89% specific in detecting endocarditis. The 30-day and 3-month all-cause mortality for bacteremia was 17% and 24%, respectively. Six out of seven patients with endocarditis survived. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic regimen for aerococcal bloodstream infections and endocarditis should be guided by species identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. DENOVA scoring system's performance in this study is more congruent to other studies. Hence, it can be used as an adjunctive tool in assessing the need for echocardiogram to rule out endocarditis. In our experience, two and four weeks of treatment for bloodstream infections and endocarditis, respectively, had good outcomes.


Subject(s)
Aerococcus/isolation & purification , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/diagnosis , Endocarditis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Sepsis/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/microbiology , Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Endocarditis, Bacterial/microbiology , Female , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Sepsis/drug therapy , Sepsis/microbiology , Young Adult
3.
BMC Microbiol ; 19(1): 228, 2019 10 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31638894

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Infective endocarditis (IE) is associated with high rates of mortality. Prolonged treatments with high-dose intravenous antibiotics often fail to eradicate the infection, frequently leading to high-risk surgical intervention. By providing a mechanism of antibiotic tolerance, which escapes conventional antibiotic susceptibility profiling, microbial biofilm represents a key diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for clinicians. This study aims at assessing a rapid biofilm identification assay and a targeted antimicrobial susceptibility profile of biofilm-growing bacteria in patients with IE, which were unresponsive to antibiotic therapy. RESULTS: Staphylococcus aureus was the most common isolate (50%), followed by Enterococcus faecalis (25%) and Streptococcus gallolyticus (25%). All microbial isolates were found to be capable of producing large, structured biofilms in vitro. As expected, antibiotic treatment either administered on the basis of antibiogram or chosen empirically among those considered first-line antibiotics for IE, including ceftriaxone, daptomycin, tigecycline and vancomycin, was not effective at eradicating biofilm-growing bacteria. Conversely, antimicrobial susceptibility profile of biofilm-growing bacteria indicated that teicoplanin, oxacillin and fusidic acid were most effective against S. aureus biofilm, while ampicillin was the most active against S. gallolyticus and E. faecalis biofilm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that biofilm-producing bacteria, from surgically treated IE, display a high tolerance to antibiotics, which is undetected by conventional antibiograms. The rapid identification and antimicrobial tolerance profiling of biofilm-growing bacteria in IE can provide key information for both antimicrobial therapy and prevention strategies.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/drug effects , Biofilms/drug effects , Endocarditis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Endocarditis/microbiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Endocarditis/drug therapy , Endocarditis/surgery , Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Endocarditis, Bacterial/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Phylogeny , Treatment Outcome
4.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 76(14): 1033-1036, 2019 Jul 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31201773

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: A case report of the use of linezolid and daptomycin for the treatment of multidrug-resistant right-sided infective endocarditis is presented. SUMMARY: A 36-year-old patient with a history of intravenous drug use was hospitalized for treatment of native tricuspid valve endocarditis resulting in persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. During the admission the patient was unsuccessfully treated with vancomycin monotherapy (final E-test minimum inhibitory concentration, 4 µg/mL). The patient's treatment was switched to daptomycin and gentamicin, with no improvement in blood culture results over 4 days. Gentamicin was discontinued, and linezolid was administered in combination with daptomycin; bacteremia was cleared after 13 days of linezolid and daptomycin combination therapy. Due to daptomycin resistance (minimum inhibitory concentration, 4 µg/mL), gentamicin was substituted for daptomycin due to the former agent's synergistic effects with linezolid. After 23 days of therapy the patient was transferred to another facility for a tricuspid valve replacement procedure, which was completed without complications. The patient was transferred in stable condition to a skilled nursing facility to continue antibiotic therapy lasting 6 weeks from the date of surgery. The patient's blood cultures remained negative. CONCLUSION: A 36-year-old woman with resistant tricuspid valve endocarditis was successfully treated with linezolid in combination with daptomycin.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Daptomycin/therapeutic use , Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Linezolid/therapeutic use , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Daptomycin/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Drug Substitution , Drug Synergism , Endocarditis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Endocarditis, Bacterial/microbiology , Female , Gentamicins/pharmacology , Gentamicins/therapeutic use , Humans , Linezolid/pharmacology , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Treatment Outcome , Tricuspid Valve/microbiology , Vancomycin/pharmacology , Vancomycin/therapeutic use
5.
Biomed Pharmacother ; 111: 537-547, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30597307

ABSTRACT

Last few decades have witnessed the unprecedented growth in the application of probiotics for promoting the general gut health as well as their inception as biotherapeutics to alleviate certain clinical disorders related to dysbiosis. While numerous studies have substantiated the health-restoring potentials for a restricted group of microbial species, the marketed extrapolation of a similar probiotic label to a large number of partially characterized microbial formulations seems biased. In particular, the individuals under neonatal stages and/or those with some clinical conditions including malignancies, leaky gut, diabetes mellitus, and post-organ transplant convalescence likely fail to reap the benefits of probiotics. Further exacerbating the conditions, some probiotic strains might take advantage of the weak immunity in these vulnerable groups and turn into opportunistic pathogens engendering life-threatening pneumonia, endocarditis, and sepsis. Moreover, the unregulated and rampant use of probiotics potentially carry the risk of plasmid-mediated antibiotic resistance transfer to the gut infectious pathogens. In this review, we discuss the safety perspectives of probiotics and their therapeutic interventions in certain at-risk population groups. The embodied arguments and hypotheses certainly will shed light on the fact why probiotic usage should be treated with caution.


Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements/adverse effects , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/drug effects , Probiotics/administration & dosage , Probiotics/adverse effects , Animals , Dysbiosis/chemically induced , Dysbiosis/diagnosis , Dysbiosis/microbiology , Endocarditis, Bacterial/chemically induced , Endocarditis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/physiology , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Sepsis/chemically induced , Sepsis/diagnosis , Systematic Reviews as Topic
7.
BMC Infect Dis ; 18(1): 65, 2018 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29390976

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the last decades, probiotics have been widely used as food supplements because of their putative beneficial health effects. They are generally considered safe but rare reports of serious infections caused by bacteria included in the definition of probiotics raise concerns on their potential pathogenic role in patients with particular predisposing factors. Patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) are exposed to infections because of telangiectasias and arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). We describe what is, to our knowledge, the first case of infective endocarditis (IE) caused by Lactobacillus rhamnosus in a patient with HHT. A systematic review of the relevant medical literature is presented. CASE PRESENTATION: A patient with HHT and an aortic bioprosthesis was admitted because of prolonged fever not responding to antibiotics. The patient had a history of repeated serious infections with hospitalizations and prolonged use of antibiotics, and used to assume large amounts of different commercial products containing probiotics. Weeks before the onset of symptoms the patient had been treated with nasal packings and with surgical closure of a nasal bleeding site because of recurrent epistaxis. A diagnosis of IE of the aortic bioprosthesis was made. All blood coltures were positive for L. rhamnosus. The patients responded to a cycle of 6 weeks of amoxicillin/clavulanate plus gentamicin. A systematic review of IE linked to consumption of probiotics, and of infective endocarditis in patients with HHT was conducted. 10 cases of IE linked to probiotics consumption and 6 cases of IE in patients with HHT were found. CONCLUSIONS: Consumption of probiotics can pose a risk of serious infections in patients with particular predisposing factors. Patients with HHT can be considered at risk because of their predisposition to infections. Prophylaxis with antibiotics before nasal packings in patients with HHT can be considered.


Subject(s)
Endocarditis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Probiotics/administration & dosage , Telangiectasia, Hereditary Hemorrhagic/complications , Aged , Amoxicillin/pharmacology , Amoxicillin/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bioprosthesis/microbiology , Clavulanic Acid/pharmacology , Dietary Supplements , Endocarditis, Bacterial/complications , Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Endocarditis, Bacterial/microbiology , Epistaxis/surgery , Gentamicins/pharmacology , Gentamicins/therapeutic use , Humans , Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus/drug effects , Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus/isolation & purification , Male
9.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 33(9): 625.e1-625.e23, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25937457

ABSTRACT

Both bacteremia and infective endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus are common and severe diseases. The prognosis may darken not infrequently, especially in the presence of intracardiac devices or methicillin-resistance. Indeed, the optimization of the antimicrobial therapy is a key step in the outcome of these infections. The high rates of treatment failure and the increasing interest in the influence of vancomycin susceptibility in the outcome of infections caused by both methicillin-susceptible and -resistant isolates has led to the research of novel therapeutic schemes. Specifically, the interest raised in recent years on the new antimicrobials with activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci has been also extended to infections caused by susceptible strains, which still carry the most important burden of infection. Recent clinical and experimental research has focused in the activity of new combinations of antimicrobials, their indication and role still being debatable. Also, the impact of an appropriate empirical antimicrobial treatment has acquired relevance in recent years. Finally, it is noteworthy the impact of the implementation of a systematic bundle of measures for improving the outcome. The aim of this clinical guideline is to provide an ensemble of recommendations in order to improve the treatment and prognosis of bacteremia and infective endocarditis caused by S. aureus, in accordance to the latest evidence published.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/diagnosis , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Endocarditis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/microbiology , Cross Infection/diagnosis , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/microbiology , Disease Management , Endocarditis, Bacterial/microbiology , Endocarditis, Bacterial/surgery , Humans , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Population Surveillance , Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization , Standard of Care , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnostic imaging
10.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 33(9): 626-32, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25937456

ABSTRACT

Bacteremia and infective endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus are common and severe diseases. Optimization of treatment is fundamental in the prognosis of these infections. The high rates of treatment failure and the increasing interest in the influence of vancomycin susceptibility in the outcome of infections caused by both methicillin-susceptible and -resistant isolates have led to research on novel therapeutic schemes. The interest in the new antimicrobials with activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci has been extended to susceptible strains, which still carry the most important burden of infection. New combinations of antimicrobials have been investigated in experimental and clinical studies, but their role is still being debated. Also, the appropriateness of the initial empirical therapy has acquired relevance in recent years. The aim of this guideline is to update the 2009 guidelines and to provide an ensemble of recommendations in order to improve the treatment of staphylococcal bacteremia and infective endocarditis, in accordance with the latest published evidence.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/diagnosis , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Endocarditis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/microbiology , Cross Infection/diagnosis , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/microbiology , Disease Management , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Endocarditis, Bacterial/microbiology , Endocarditis, Bacterial/surgery , Humans , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Population Surveillance , Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization , Standard of Care , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnostic imaging
11.
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris) ; 64(2): 81-6, 2015 Apr.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25702236

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Neurological complications are the most frequent extracardiac complications of infective endocarditis (IE). This study aimed to describe the epidemiological, clinical and paraclinical aspects, and outcome of neurological complications of infective endocarditis in three hospitals in the city of Ouagadougou in Burkina Faso. PATIENTS AND METHOD: From 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2012, we included all patients suffering from IE and selected those in whom a neurological complication was objectified. Neurological involvement was sought on clinical examination but especially CT brain (ischemic infarcts, hemorrhages, aneurysms and abscesses). Blood cultures were systematic. Echocardiography was done for vegetations and characteristics. RESULTS: Among 63 cases of IE, neurological complications were found in 14 patients (22.2%). The average age of patients with neurological complications was 37.4 ± 5.8 years. The sex ratio was 1.3 for women. Neurological damage consisted of nine cases of stroke (64.3%), three cases of hemorrhagic stroke (21.4%) and two cases of brain abscess (14.3%). Neurological complications had already occurred before hospitalization in 4 cases. Blood cultures were positive in 8 cases. Germs found were predominantly Staphylococcus aureus (5 cases) and Streptococcus a- viridans (2 cases). All cases of S. aureus were complicated by stroke. At echocardiography, vegetation was found in all cases. It was found on the mitral in 7 cases, the aorta in 3 cases, the mitral and aortic in 2 cases and the mitral and tricuspid in 2 cases also. The EI had occurred on a native valve in 11 cases, prosthesis in 4 cases (2 mitral and 2 aortic). The vegetations average diameter was 11.2 ± 2.1 mm (6.4 and 1 7.7 mm). Vegetations were mobile in 12 cases. The treatment consisted of antibiotics adapted to the antibiogram, neurological and cardiovascular monitoring. The evolution was marked by seven deaths (50%), including 5 deaths related to cerebral complication (71.4% of deaths). CONCLUSION: This study shows that neurological complications during infective endocarditis are frequent, dominated by stroke with a high mortality.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Brain Abscess/microbiology , Endocarditis/complications , Endocarditis/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcus aureus , Streptococcal Infections/diagnosis , Streptococcus , Stroke/microbiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Brain Abscess/diagnosis , Burkina Faso/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Endocarditis/drug therapy , Endocarditis/mortality , Endocarditis, Bacterial/complications , Endocarditis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Staphylococcal Infections/complications , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/mortality , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Streptococcal Infections/complications , Streptococcal Infections/drug therapy , Streptococcal Infections/mortality , Streptococcus/isolation & purification , Stroke/diagnosis , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
12.
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi ; 53(5): 363-7, 2014 May.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25146401

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the profile of patients with infective endocarditis (IE) and assess prognostic factors of IE. METHODS: Clinical and etiology data of 218 patients with IE were collected retrospectively from January 2011 to January 2013. The distribution and antimicrobial susceptibilities of pathogens causing IE were evaluated. Prognostic factors associated with IE were determined by univariate and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: There were 148 men and 70 women with age of (46.0 ± 14.6) years. Ninety-five (43.6%) of them had heart diseases, including 72 cases (33.0%) of congenital heart disease and 23 cases (10.6%) of chronic rheumatic heart disease. Vegetations were detected by echocardiography in 171 (78.4%) patients. Microorganisms causing IE were identified in 84 cases (38.5%) cases. Streptococcus viridans was the dominant pathogen, accounted for 63.1% of all the pathogens, followed by Staphylococcus (13.1%) and Enterococcus (4.8%). Totally 7/11 Streptococcus viridans was susceptible to penicillin, while 100% susceptible to the third and fourth generation cephalosporins, vancomycin and linezolid. One hundred and eighty cases underwent operations. The in-hospital mortality rate of IE was 3.2%. In univariate regression, health care-associated infection, prosthetic valve, anemia and chest symptoms (distress or pain) were related to the increased risk of mortality in patients with IE, while surgery appeared to be a protective factor. In the logistic regression model, the variables significantly associated with IE prognosis were health care-associated infection (OR = 17.03, 95%CI 1.76-164.75, P = 0.014) and anemia (Hb < 90 g/L) (OR = 13.47, 95%CI 2.46-73.60, P = 0.003) and surgery treatment (OR = 0.17, 95%CI 0.03-0.97, P = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Although Streptococcus viridans is the most common pathogen causing IE, the pathogens of IE become versatile. The antibacterial activity of penicillin against Streptococcus viridans is low. Health care-associated infection and anemia are risk factors of IE prognosis, while surgery treatment is a protective factor of severe IE.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Endocarditis, Bacterial/microbiology , Enterococcus/isolation & purification , Hospital Mortality , Staphylococcus/isolation & purification , Viridans Streptococci/isolation & purification , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Echocardiography , Endocarditis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Enterococcus/drug effects , Female , Heart Diseases/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Prognosis , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Rheumatic Heart Disease/epidemiology , Staphylococcus/drug effects , Viridans Streptococci/drug effects
16.
Intern Med ; 52(10): 1131-5, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23676604

ABSTRACT

Aminoglycosides are useful antimicrobial agents for treating infective endocarditis; however, they occasionally cause troublesome side effects, such as nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. We herein report a case of infective endocarditis caused by Enterococcus faecalis that was treated successfully with continuous infusion of ampicillin without adjunctive aminoglycosides. The serum ampicillin concentrations were higher than the minimal inhibitory concentration for the target strain. Although the use of ampicillin monotherapy is currently avoided because double ß-lactam therapy is reportedly more effective, continuous penicillin administration remains an effective therapeutic choice for treating infective endocarditis.


Subject(s)
Ampicillin/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Enterococcus faecalis/isolation & purification , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Aged , Aminoglycosides/adverse effects , Ampicillin/administration & dosage , Ampicillin/blood , Ampicillin/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/blood , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Contraindications , Diagnosis, Differential , Endocarditis, Bacterial/blood , Endocarditis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Endocarditis, Bacterial/microbiology , Enterococcus faecalis/drug effects , Femoral Neck Fractures/surgery , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/blood , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Mitral Valve/microbiology , Postoperative Complications/drug therapy , Postoperative Complications/microbiology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pyelonephritis/diagnosis , Streptomycin , Warfarin/therapeutic use
18.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 23(4): 375-81, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22082221

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection is steadily increasing. However, no consensus has been reached with respect to the type and duration of antimicrobial therapy in this specific population of patients. The role played by new anti-Staphylococcus agents has not been defined. The aims of this study were to describe the microbiological characteristics of a large population of patients with CIED infections and to test the in vitro susceptibility of the various strains to different antimicrobials. METHODS: Two hundred eighty-six patients with CIED infection were included. The minimal inhibitory concentrations of 9 antimicrobials, including linezolid, tigecycline, and daptomycin were measured against all strains of staphylococci isolated. RESULTS: Microbiologic confirmation was obtained in 252 (88%) patients, the vast majority were from Staphylococcus species (86%), 90% of these were coagulase negative strains and 10% were Staphylococcus aureus; 30.5% were methicillin-resistant. All strains were susceptible to vancomycin, nearly 15% of coagulase negative strains were nonsusceptible to teicoplanin, and nearly 100% of the strains were susceptible to the 3 new antimicrobials. CONCLUSIONS: In this large contemporary study, we show that Staphylococcus is by far the most common cause of CIED infections, with the majority due to coagulase negative strains. Methicillin-resistance is common in this population. Currently, we would recommend vancomycin as first-line empirical therapy. However, given that not all patients tolerate vancomycin, we believe that newer antimicrobial therapies should now be tested in clinical trials to establish their clinical effectiveness in treating patients with device infections.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Equipment Contamination , Pacemaker, Artificial/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Chi-Square Distribution , Device Removal , Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests , Endocarditis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Endocarditis, Bacterial/microbiology , Equipment Design , France , Humans , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/classification , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Time Factors
19.
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi ; 116(4): 1028-32, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23700883

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Infectious endocarditis (IE) represents a rare pathology in children, but with lethal potential. The goal of the therapy is fast and total eradication of the infection. AIMS: To study particularities in diagnosis and treatment for infectious endocarditis in children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Children with infectious endocarditis hospitalized between January 2007 - February 2012 in the Cardiology Department of the ,,Sfânta Maria" Children Emergency Hospital of lasi have been included in the study. RESULTS: The patients are aged between 23 days and 16 years, the average age being 4 years old. At approximately 88% of the patients (14 cases), the endocardial damage appeared in the pre-existent valvular lesions, specially mitral and aortal. As associated congenital malformations, the patients prevailingly presented ventricular septal defect, mitral valve prolapse, arterial canal persistence, aortic stenosis, coarctation of the aorta. Blood cultures were collected and the most frequent identified etiological agents were: Staphylococcus coagulase-positive, Streptococcus mitis, Staphylococcus speciae coagulase-negative, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Streptococcus bovis, Escherichia coli, for which the antibiogram showed sensitivity for beta-lactam, cephalosporins, glycopeptides, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, rifampicin, quinolone, lincosamides, oxazolidinones, and thus specific treatment was set up according to the antibiogram. CONCLUSIONS: The infectious endocarditis is a serious disease that affects young age too, leading towards exitus in some cases. Diagnostic imaging and early blood cultures are of relevance in order to intervene promptly. The treatment must be targeted and applied as fast as possible.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Bacterial Infections/therapy , Endocarditis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Endocarditis, Bacterial/therapy , Bacterial Infections/complications , Bacterial Infections/mortality , Child , Child, Preschool , Early Diagnosis , Endocarditis, Bacterial/microbiology , Endocarditis, Bacterial/mortality , Enterococcus/isolation & purification , Female , Heart Defects, Congenital/complications , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Treatment Outcome , Viridans Streptococci/isolation & purification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL