Intravitreal triple therapy with vancomycin, ceftazidime, and moxifloxacin for bacterial endophthalmitis: A Twelve-year experience.

PURPOSE: Increasing rates of antibiotic resistance in endophthalmitis have been reported. This study examines outcomes of triple therapy with intravitreal vancomycin, ceftazidime, and moxifloxacin for endophthalmitis. METHODS: Retrospective, consecutive series of all patients treated with abovementioned intravitreal antibiotics from January 2009 to June 2021. Percentages of eyes attaining greater than or equal to 20/200 and 20/50 Snellen visual acuities and adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: 112 eyes met inclusion criteria. 63 of 112 eyes (56%) achieved a visual acuity of 20/200 during follow-up, with 39 (35%) returning to at least 20/50. In subgroup analysis, 23 of 24 (96%) eyes with post-cataract endophthalmitis obtained ≥ 20/200 acuity and 21 of 24 (88%) obtained ≥ 20/50 acuity during follow-up. There were no cases of macular infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal moxifloxacin (160 µg/0.1 mL) was well tolerated as an adjunct to vancomycin and ceftazidime for bacterial endophthalmitis. Use of this novel combination offers several theoretical advantages compared to standard therapy with two antibiotics, including expanded gram-negative coverage and potential synergy, and may be particularly valuable in geographies where the local antibiogram supports empiric use. Further study is merited to verify the safety and efficacy profile.

Endophthalmitis Prophylaxis Failures in Patients Injected With Intracameral Antibiotic During Cataract Surgery.

PURPOSE: To estimate the association of cefuroxime and moxifloxacin in relation to the occurrence of endophthalmitis following phacoemulsification cataract surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical cohort study. METHODS: We studied patients with noncomplex phacoemulsification cataract surgery in Kaiser Permanente Northern California during 2014-2019. Data were obtained for acute, postoperative endophthalmitis within 90 days of phacoemulsification, including culture and antibiogram results, intracameral and topical antibiotic agent, and dose. In a post hoc analysis, we also examined preoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD) and postoperative anterior chamber volume (ACV). RESULTS: Of 216,141 surgeries, endophthalmitis occurred in 0.020% of moxifloxacin-injected eyes and 0.013% of cefuroxime eyes (relative risk 1.62 with 95% CI 0.82-3.20, P = .16). Of the 34 (0.016%) cases of endophthalmitis, cefuroxime 1 mg was injected into 13 eyes and moxifloxacin 0.1% into 21 eyes. Organisms with antibiograms were identified in 12 (35%) cases. Of these, bacteria recovered from cefuroxime-injected eyes were resistant to cefuroxime in all cases (4/4), with Enterococcus comprising half of these. In eyes injected with moxifloxacin 0.1%, 6 out of 7 organisms were sensitive to moxifloxacin injected with 0.1 mL and in 1 eye injected with 1 mL. Streptococcus was the most common organism recovered (6/9) in moxifloxacin-injected eyes. Preoperative ACD and postoperative calculated ACV were higher in eyes injected with moxifloxacin. CONCLUSIONS: Endophthalmitis cases with positive cultures were generally related to organism resistance in cefuroxime eyes but to sensitive organisms in moxifloxacin eyes. Moxifloxacin doses may have been insufficient in eyes with larger ACV.

Antimicrobial guide to posterior segment infections.

PURPOSE: This review article is meant to serve as a reference guide and to assist the treating physician in making an appropriate selection and duration of an antimicrobial agent. METHODS: Literature review. RESULTS: Infections of the posterior segment require prompt medical or surgical therapy to reduce the risk of permanent vision loss. While numerous options exist to treat these infections, doses and alternative therapies, especially with contraindications for first-line therapy, are often elusive. Antimicrobial agents to treat posterior segment infections can be administered via various routes, including topical, intravitreal, intravenous, and oral. CONCLUSIONS: Although there are many excellent review articles on the management of endophthalmitis, we take the opportunity in this review to comprehensively summarize the appropriate antimicrobial regimen of both common and rare infectious etiologies of the posterior segment, using evidence from clinical trials and large case series.

Validation of a Comprehensive Clinical Algorithm for the Assessment and Treatment of Microbial Keratitis.

PURPOSE: To validate a comprehensive clinical algorithm for the assessment and treatment of microbial keratitis (MK). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: The "1, 2, 3 Rule" for the initial management of MK was conceived by Vital and associates in 2007 to inform the decision as to when to perform corneal cultures. The rule is invoked when any 1 of 3 clinical parameters is met: ≥1+ anterior chamber cells, ≥2 mm infiltrate, or infiltrate ≤3 mm distance from the corneal center. When the rule is met, we added the mandatory use of fortified topical antibiotics after cultures are obtained. We compared outcomes of cases presenting to Massachusetts Eye and Ear 2 years before (Group I, n = 665) and after (Group II, n = 767) algorithm implementation. The primary composite outcome was a vision-threatening complication, such as corneal perforation. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 67.0 and 60.0 days, respectively, 172 patients experienced a vision-threatening complication (Group I, 12.9% vs Group II, 11.2%, P = .51). While the algorithm codified conventional management practice at either end of disease severity, the effect of algorithm-augmented care was best appreciated in patients with lesions satisfying only 1 criterion. In this group, there was an increase in the proportion of patients undergoing culture at presentation (54.6% vs 67.7%, P = .006), fortified antibiotic prescription (29.7% vs 53.9%, P < .001), and reduction in vision-threatening complications (9.7% vs 1.8%, P = .001). The proportion of patients who were not cultured at presentation but later required culturing decreased (13.4% vs 5.1%, P = .001), as did patients who did not meet any criteria but were nonetheless cultured (23.9% vs 8.5%, P < .001). Multiple logistic regression showed that all algorithm parameters were independently associated with outcome: ≥1+ anterior chamber cells (odds ratio [OR] 1.66, 95% confidence interval 1.09-2.52); ≥2 mm infiltrate (OR 4.74, 2.68-8.40); and ≤3 mm from corneal center (OR 2.82, 1.85-4.31), confirmed with comparison to a bootstrapped sample (n = 10,000). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of this algorithm reduced vision-threatening complications for patients with lesions satisfying only 1 criterion, arguably the most difficult patients in whom to judge disease severity. Implementation also led to a decrease in patients receiving unnecessary care.

Enterobacter endophthalmitis: Clinical settings, susceptibility profile, and management outcomes across two decades.

Purpose: To describe the clinical presentation and management of Enterobacter endophthalmitis and compare with previous in-house published literature. Methods: This was a retrospective interventional comparative case series involving 44 cases with culture proven Enterobacter endophthalmitis from April 2006 to August 2018 who underwent vitrectomy/vitreous biopsy, intravitreal antibiotics with or without additional procedures as appropriate. The current outcomes were compared to the outcomes previously reported a decade back from our center. The mean age at presentation, predisposing factor, number of interventions, interval between inciting event and presentation, type of intravitreal antibiotic used, anatomic, and the functional outcomes were analyzed and compared to the previous series. Results: There were 30 males. Mean age was 22.73 ± 21.35 years (median 14 years). Inciting event was open globe injury in 34 (77.27%) eyes, 4 (9.09%) eyes following cataract surgery, 3 (6.81%) eyes with endogenous endophthalmitis, 2 (4.54%) eyes following keratoplasty, and 1 eye (2.27%) following trabeculectomy. Presenting visual acuity was favorable (≥20/400) in 2 eyes (4.54%), at the final visit it was in 11 eyes (25%). The organisms were most sensitive to ciprofloxacin (95.12%), amikacin (90.47%), and ceftazidime (85.36%). A comparison of the current study with previous in-house study showed that number of eyes with presenting vision ≥20/400 as well as final vision ≥20/400 were comparable. Susceptibility was highest to ciprofloxacin 39 (95.12%) (previous series) and 33 (92%) (current series). Conclusion: Enterobacter organisms show susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, amikacin, and ceftazidime. Susceptibility profile, clinical presentations, and management remain largely similar over many years. Final outcome is unfavorable.

Postoperative Endophthalmitis Before and After Preferred Utilization of Prophylactic Intracameral Antibiotics for Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgeries at Cole Eye Institute.

PURPOSE: To compare the rate of endophthalmitis of intracameral versus topical antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing phacoemulsification at a single-centered, multispecialty ophthalmological institute. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the rate of endophthalmitis by coding search within 90 days of cataract surgery in periods before (May 15, 2012-May 15, 2014) and after (April 30, 2015-April 30, 2017) intracameral antibiotics became the institution's preferred practice pattern for phacoemulsification. Clinical data were collected for each endophthalmitis case, including timing of onset, presenting symptoms and signs, culture results, treatment performed, and visual acuity outcome. RESULTS: The rate of postphacoemulsification endophthalmitis decreased from 0.18% (29 eyes among 16,201 cataract surgeries) to 0.07% (11 eyes among 16,325 surgeries) when the preferred method was changed from topical to intracameral antibiotics (P=0.004) with an odds ratio of 0.32. Endophthalmitis cases in the 2 groups had comparable visual acuity at initial presentation and at 3 months (P=0.86). The most commonly isolated organism in culture-proven cases of endophthalmitis in both groups was coagulase-negative staphylococcus. The rate of gram-positive endophthalmitis decreased from 0.08% to 0.02% with an odds ratio of 0.23 (P=0.012) while the rate of gram-negative cases remained similar. CONCLUSIONS: The use of intracameral antibiotics during cataract surgery was associated with a statistically significant reduction of postoperative endophthalmitis.

Epidemiology and Mortality-Related Prognostic Factors in Endophthalmitis.

Purpose: Endophthalmitis describes any intraocular inflammation that involves both the posterior and anterior segments and is divided into endogenous and exogenous types according to its pathogenesis. The incidence of endophthalmitis and its risk factors have been extensively evaluated. However, few studies have explored the mortality rate in patients diagnosed with endophthalmitis. Methods: We obtained data entered into the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) from 2000 to 2013. The data collected included all discharge diagnoses of endophthalmitis in inpatients. Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and prognostic factors were evaluated. Results: This study identified 7764 patients who were diagnosed with endophthalmitis in Taiwan from 2000 to 2013. The mortality rate was 0.97% (75/7764), and the mean age was 63.57 ± 15.72 years. Epidemiological characteristics were compared as "with or without" for different systemic comorbidities, and the results indicated that the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) was significantly higher in cases comorbid with renal disease (AOR 2.864, P = 0.001), septicemia (AOR 8.886, P < 0.001), pneumonia (AOR 2.072, P = 0.030), and tumors (AOR 7.437, P < 0.001). However, comorbidity with diabetes mellitus (DM) lowered the AOR by 0.500-fold (P = 0.026). There was no significant difference in ORs between patients comorbid with hypertension, depression, anxiety, hyperlipidemia, thyrotoxicosis, liver disease, or injury (all P > 0.05). Conclusions: Among inpatients with endophthalmitis, predictors of mortality include renal disease, septicemia, pneumonia, neoplasia, a greater burden of comorbidity (especially catastrophic illness), longer hospital stays (more than 11 days), and higher medical costs. Interestingly, DM decreased the OR for inpatient mortality.

Microbiological Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Acinetobacter spp. Endophthalmitis with the First Reported Case of Acinetobacter haemolyticus Endophthalmitis.

AIM: To present the microbiological details and clinical outcomes of Acinetobacter spp. endophthalmitis with the first reported case of A. haemolyticus. METHODS: A retrospective study of microbiologically proven Acinetobacter spp. endophthalmitis was carried out from 2010 to 2015. The data collected included age, type of endophthalmitis, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), species involved, and antibiotic susceptibility pattern. The primary outcomes measured were anatomical outcomes in terms of globe integrity and functional outcome as BCVA at last follow-up. RESULTS: Eleven patients out of 3004 patients who underwent surgery for endophthalmitis were due to Acinetobacter spp. Seven cases (63.6%) were both smear and culture positive; there were two cases (18%) each of A. haemolyticus and A. baumanii. Four cases (36%) were only culture positive with negative smear. Three cases (27.2%) were polymicrobial. Ten cases (91%) were susceptible to amikacin and nine (82%) to ciprofloxacin. Six (54.5%) were resistant to ceftazidime. Mean logMAR BCVA improved to 1.8 (20/1330) from an initial 2.5 (20/6839). Pthisis bulbi was seen in two cases (18%). CONCLUSIONS: Even though the outcomes of Acinetobacter spp. endophthalmitis are modest to poor, outcomes following intervention are relatively good for A. haemolyticus. These cases have good susceptibility to amikacin, but are often resistant to ceftazidime.

Clinical presentations, risk factors and outcomes of ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative endophthalmitis.

BACKGROUND: To describe the clinical features and outcomes of patients diagnosed with ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative endophthalmitis and the role of intravitreal imipenem in these cases. DESIGN: Retrospective consecutive interventional case series at a tertiary eye care centre in South India. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive cases of ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative endophthalmitis from April 2010 to December 2014. Fifty-six cases diagnosed during this time period were included. METHODS: All cases were managed with vitreous biopsy/vitrectomy, microscopy and undiluted vitreous culture, antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial isolates and received intravitreal antibiotics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Anatomic and visual outcome of these cases, antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of intravitreal imipenem and outcome of cases injected with it. RESULTS: Commonest presentation was acute endophthalmitis following cataract surgery (27 eyes, 48.21%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated in 33 eyes (58.93%; 95% CI 46.05-71.81%). Nineteen eyes (34%; 95% CI 21.59-46.41%) developed phthisis; 14 eyes (25%; 95% CI 13.66-36.34%) had vision <20/200; 17 eyes (30.35%; 95% CI 18.31-42.39%) eyes had an ambulatory vision >20/200 (logMAR 1); 6 eyes (10.71%; 95% CI 2.61-18.81%) had a reading vision >20/40 (logMAR 0.3). Trend was towards better anatomic (72.73% vs. 40%) (P = 0.05) and visual improvement in the imipenem group (logMAR 3.94 + 0.21 to 2.43 + 1.4; P = 0.002), as compared with non-imipenem group (logMAR 2.99 + 1.3 to 2.55 + 1.4; P = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Outcome of ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative endophthalmitis is poor. P. aeruginosa is the commonest isolated organism. All cases were sensitive to imipenem. There was a trend towards better anatomic outcome in imipenem-treated eyes.

Clinical features, microbiological profile and treatment outcome of patients with Corynebacterium endophthalmitis: review of a decade from a tertiary eye care centre in southern India.

AIMS: To report the clinical and microbiological profile along with treatment outcome of patients with endophthalmitis caused by Corynebacterium sp. METHODS: This is a retrospective, consecutive, non-comparative case series of patients with culture-proven Corynebacterium endophthalmitis seen between August 2004 and July 2014. RESULTS: Of 5439 patients clinically diagnosed as infective endophthalmitis, vitreous samples were culture positive for bacteria in 1488 (27%). Sixteen patients (1%) were identified as Corynebacterium endophthalmitis. The clinical settings included trauma (n=10), post-cataract surgery (n=5) and post-penetrating keratoplasty (n=1). In 7/16 (44%) patients, the organisms were visualised in direct microscopy. Tested by disc-diffusion method, all isolates were vancomycin sensitive. However, 9 of 10 isolates were resistant to ceftazidime and 5 of 14 isolates were resistant to amikacin. Initial treatment strategies included pars plana vitrectomy with intravitreal antibiotics (vancomycin and amikacin/ceftazidime) injection (n=9) and pars plana lensectomy along with pars plana vitrectomy and intravitreal antibiotics (vancomycin and amikacin/ceftazidime) injection (n=7). Final visual acuity was 20/200 or better in 11 (69%) of 16 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of corynebacterial endophthalmitis is low. The organisms are susceptible to vancomycin, and early appropriate treatment results in favourable outcome.

ENDOPHTHALMITIS CAUSED BY SERRATIA MARCESCENS: Clinical Features, Antibiotic Susceptibilities, and Treatment Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To report the clinical features, antibiotic sensitivities, and visual outcomes associated with endophthalmitis caused by Serratia marcescens. METHODS: A consecutive case series of patients with vitreous culture-positive endophthalmitis caused by S. marcescens from July 1, 1993, to June 30, 2012, at a large university referral center. Findings from this study were compared with those of a previous study (January 1980-June 1993) from our institution. RESULTS: Of the 10 study patients who were identified, clinical settings included trabeculectomy bleb-associated (n = 3), post-cataract surgery (n = 2), post-penetrating keratoplasty (n = 2), post-scleral buckle (n = 1), glaucoma drainage implant-associated (n = 1), and post-keratoprosthesis (n = 1). Clinical features included pain (n = 10) and hypopyon (n = 5). Presenting visual acuity was hand motions or worse in seven cases. All isolates were sensitive to gentamicin, ceftazidime, imipenem, and levofloxacin. The MIC 90s of isolates for antibiotics tested in the current period compared with isolates from January 1980 to June 1993 were unchanged. All isolates were resistant to vancomycin. Initial treatment strategies were vitreous tap and intravitreal antibiotic injection (n = 8), pars plana vitrectomy with intravitreal antibiotic injection (n = 1), and evisceration (n = 1). When repeat vitreous fluid was obtained, persistent positive cultures were present in 1 (10%) of 10 patients in this study, compared with 5 (50%) of 10 patients in the previous study. Final visual acuity was no light perception in 6 of 10 patients (60%). CONCLUSION: Outcomes were generally poor with a high rate of complete visual loss in the affected eye.

ENDOPHTHALMITIS CAUSED BY PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA: Clinical Features, Antibiotic Susceptibilities, and Treatment Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To report the clinical features, antibiotic susceptibilities, and visual outcomes associated with endophthalmitis caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. METHODS: A consecutive case series. Microbiology database records were retrospectively reviewed for all patients with endophthalmitis caused by P. aeruginosa from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2012, at a large university referral center. The corresponding clinical records were then reviewed to evaluate the endophthalmitis clinical features and treatment outcomes. RESULTS: In the 12 patients identified, clinical settings included postcataract surgery (n = 4), postpenetrating keratoplasty (n = 3), endogenous source (n = 2), post-pars plana vitrectomy (n = 1), trabeculectomy bleb-associated setting (n = 1), and glaucoma drainage implant-associated setting (n = 1). All patients presented with hypopyon. Presenting visual acuity was hand motions or worse in all cases. All isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime and levofloxacin. When comparing isolates in this study with isolates from a previous study (1987 to 2001), the minimal inhibitory concentration required to inhibit 90% of isolates (MIC 90, in micrograms per milliliter) remained the same for ceftazidime (8), ciprofloxacin (0.5), imipenem (4), tobramycin (0.5), and amikacin (4). Initial treatment strategies were vitreous tap and injection (n = 9) and pars plana vitrectomy with intravitreal antibiotics (n = 3). Final visual acuity was light perception or worse in 11 of the 12 patients (92%). Five patients underwent enucleation (42%). CONCLUSION: All isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime and levofloxacin, and all MIC 90s for isolates in the current period compared with isolates from 1987 to 2001 remained identical. Despite early and appropriate treatment, outcomes were generally poor with a high rate of enucleation.

Endophthalmitis caused by Enterococcus faecalis: clinical features, antibiotic sensitivities, and outcomes.

PURPOSE: To report the clinical features, antibiotic sensitivities, and visual acuity outcomes of endophthalmitis caused by Enterococcus faecalis. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, observational case series. METHODS: A consecutive case series of patients with culture-positive endophthalmitis caused by E. faecalis between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2012, at an academic referral center. RESULTS: Of 14 patients identified, clinical settings included bleb association (n = 8), occurrence after cataract surgery (n = 4), and occurrence after penetrating keratoplasty (n = 2). All isolates were vancomycin sensitive. When comparing isolates in the current study with isolates from 1990 through 2001, the minimal inhibitory concentration required to inhibit 90% of isolates increased for ciprofloxacin (4 µg/mL from 1 µg/mL), erythromycin (256 µg/mL from 4 µg/mL), and penicillin (8 µg/mL from 4 µg/mL), indicating higher levels of resistance. The minimal inhibitory concentration required to inhibit 90% of isolates remained the same for vancomycin (2 µg/mL) and linezolid (2 µg/mL). Presenting visual acuity ranged from hand movements to no light perception. Initial treatment strategies were vitreous tap and intravitreal antibiotic injection (n = 12) and pars plana vitrectomy with intravitreal antibiotic injection (n = 2). Visual acuity outcomes were 20/400 or worse in 13 (93%) of 14 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although all isolates were sensitive to vancomycin and linezolid, higher minimal inhibitory concentration required to inhibit 90% of isolates in the current study, compared with isolates from 1990 through 2001, occurred with ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, and penicillin. Despite prompt treatment, most patients had poor outcomes.

Endophthalmitis caused by streptococcal species: clinical settings, microbiology, management, and outcomes.

PURPOSE: To report the clinical settings, antibiotic susceptibilities, and outcomes of endophthalmitis caused by Streptococcus species. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational case series. METHODS: Single-center study evaluating all patients with culture-positive endophthalmitis caused by Streptococcus species between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2011. RESULTS: Study criteria were met by 63 patients. The most common clinical settings were bleb associated (n = 17; 27%), after intravitreal injection (n = 16; 25%), and after cataract surgery (n = 13; 21%). The isolates were Streptococcus viridans (n = 47; 71%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 13; 21%), and ß-hemolytic Streptococci (n = 5; 8%). Sixty (95%) of 63 isolates were susceptible to vancomycin, 47 (98%) of 48 isolates were susceptible to ceftriaxone (third-generation cephalosporin), and 57 (93%) of 61 isolates were susceptible to levofloxacin (third-generation fluoroquinolone). Between the first and second half of the study, the minimal inhibitory concentration of antibiotics required to inhibit 90% of isolates increased by 1.5-fold for ceftriaxone and 2-fold for levofloxacin and remained the same for vancomycin. Initial treatment was vitreous tap (49; 78%) or pars plana vitrectomy (14; 22%); all received intravitreal antibiotics. Visual acuity outcomes were variable: best-corrected visual acuity was 20/400 or better in 16 (25%) patients and worse than 20/400 in 47 (75%) patients. Evisceration or enucleation was performed in 16 (25%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Streptococcus isolates generally had high susceptibility rates to commonly used antibiotics. Higher antibiotic minimal inhibitory concentrations were required to inhibit 90% of isolates in vitro in the second half of the study period compared with the first half. Despite prompt treatment, most patients had poor outcomes.

Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibilities of anaerobic bacteria isolated from perforated corneal ulcers by culture and multiplex PCR: an evaluation in cases with keratitis and endophthalmitis.

BACKGROUND: Anaerobic bacteria play an important role in eye infections; however, there is limited epidemiologic data based on the the role of these bacteria in the etiology of keratitis and endophthalmitis. The aim of this re- search is to determine the prevalence of anaerobic bacteria in perforated corneal ulcers of patients with keratitis and endophthalmitis and to evaluate their antimicrobial susceptibilities. METHODS: Corneal scrapings were taken by the ophthalmologist using sterile needles. For the isolation of anaerobic bacteria, samples were inoculated on specific media and were incubated under anaerobic conditions obtained with Anaero-Gen (Oxoid & Mitsubishi Gas Company) in anaerobic jars (Oxoid USA, Inc. Columbia, MD, USA). The molecular identification of anaerobic bacteria was performed by multiplex PCR and the susceptibilities of an- aerobic bacteria to penicillin, chloramphenicol, and clindamycin were determined with the E test (bioMerieux). RESULTS: 51 strains of anaerobic bacteria belonging to four different genuses were detected by multiplex PCR and only 46 strains were isolated by culture. All of them were found susceptible to chloramphenicol whereas penicillin resistance was found in 13.3% of P.anaerobius strains, clindamycin resistance was found in 34.8% of P.acnes and 13.3% of P. anaerobius strains. Additionnaly, one strain of P. granulosum was found resistant to clindamycin, one strain of B. fragilis and one strain of P.melaninogenica were found resistant to penicillin and clindamycin. CONCLUSIONS: Routine analyses of anaerobes in perforated corneal ulcers is inevitable and usage of appropriate molecular methods, for the detection of bacteria responsible from severe infections which might not be deter- mined by cultivation, may serve for the early decision of the appropriate treatment. Taking into account the in- creasing antimicrobial resistance of anaerobic bacteria, alternative eye specific antibiotics effective against anaer- obes are needed to achieve a successful treatment.

Primera manifestación oftalmológica de una sepsis por Klebsiella. Importancia de la sospecha diagnóstica precoz / Endogenous endophthalmitis as a first clinical manifestation of Klebsiella sepsis. The importance of an early diagnosis

Caso clínico: Paciente diabético que desarrolla una uveítis unilateral con un foco de coriorretinitis en el ojo derecho asociada a fiebre y disminución de la visión. Sospechándose una endoftalmitis endógena se realizaron pruebas complementarias encontrándose abscesos hepáticos con biopsia positiva para Klebsiella. La afectación ocular se fue resolviendo gracias a antibioticoterapia intravenosa y al drenaje percutáneo de los abscesos. Conclusión: La endoftalmitis endógena por Klebsiella es un hallazgo poco frecuente con consecuencias graves. Un diagnóstico y un tratamiento antibioticoterápico tempranos pueden mejorar el cuadro aunque la visión resultante suele ser pobre(AU)

Case report: A diabetic patient who developed a unilateral uveitis with a chorioretinitis patch in his right eye associated with decreased visual acuity and fever. Endogenous endophthalmitis was suspected and complementary tests were performed, finding hepatic abscesses with Klebsiella isolation in the biopsy. The ocular disorder slowly improved with intravenous therapy and guided percutaneous liver drainage. Conclusion: Endogenous Klebsiella endophthalmitis is an uncommon condition with severe complications. An early diagnosis and aggressive antibiotic therapy can ameliorate the final course but the visual outcome still remains poor(AU)

Risk factors for acute endophthalmitis after cataract surgery: a population-based study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for suspected acute endophthalmitis after cataract surgery. DESIGN: Population-based retrospective cohort. PARTICIPANTS: Administrative data from more than 440,000 consecutive cataract surgeries in Ontario, Canada, from April 1, 2002, to March 31, 2006. METHODS: Consecutive physician billing claims for cataract surgery and specific intraoperative and postoperative procedures related to complications of cataract surgery were identified. Acute endophthalmitis was defined using surrogate markers for intraocular infection, including vitrectomy, vitreous injection, or aspiration procedures not in combination with air/fluid exchange or dislocated lens extraction, performed 1 to 14 days after cataract surgery. Anterior vitrectomy performed on the day of surgery was used as a surrogate marker for capsular rupture. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall rates of endophthalmitis were calculated and grouped by patient demographics, surgical facility, season, year, and association with capsular rupture. RESULTS: There were 617 suspected acute endophthalmitis cases of 442,177 cataract surgeries over the 4 years. The overall unadjusted and adjusted rates of suspected acute endophthalmitis were both 1.4 per 1000 cataract surgeries. Men had higher rates than women (1.70 vs. 1.19/1000 surgeries, P<0.0001) with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.40 (95% confidence interval, 1.19-1.64).The oldest age group (>or= 85 years) had the highest rate (2.18/1000), and the youngest group (20-64) had the second highest rate (1.76/1000). The endophthalmitis rates for these age groups were significantly different from those aged 65 to 84 years. The endophthalmitis rate was approximately 10-fold higher in those with capsular rupture compared with those without (13.11 vs. 1.34/1000, P<0.0001), with an adjusted odds ratio of 9.56 (95% confidence interval, 6.43-14.2). CONCLUSIONS: The overall rates of suspected acute endophthalmitis are low but significantly higher in certain patient groups. Our population-based analysis can be used as a benchmark for quality-improvement initiatives and can assist clinicians in educating their patients regarding the risks associated with cataract surgery. Future work is required to address the higher rate of endophthalmitis in men, those with capsular rupture, and the oldest patients undergoing cataract surgery.