Eficacia y seguridad de lacosamida como tratamiento complementario en pacientes pediátricos con epilepsia focal refractaria / Efficacy and safety of lacosamide as adjunctive treatment in pediatric patients with refractory focal epilepsy

ANTECEDENTES: En el marco de la metodología ad hoc para evaluar solicitudes de tecnologías sanitarias, aprobada mediante Resolución de Institución de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación N° 97-IETSI-ESSALUD-2022, se ha elaborado el presente dictamen que expone la evaluación de la eficacia y seguridad de lacosamida para el tratamiento de pacientes pediátricos con epilepsia focal refractaria. Así, el médico Dr. Edwin Martín Lazo Rivera, especialista en neurología pediátrica del Hospital Nacional Carlos Alberto Seguín Escobedo - Red Asistencial Arequipa y la Dra. Rebeca Fiorella Valdivia Bravo, especialista en pediatría del Hospital Nacional Alberto Sabogal Sologuren de la Red Prestacional Sabogal, siguiendo la Directiva N° 003-IETSI-ESSALUD-2016, enviaron al Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación ­ IETSI sus respectivas solicitudes de autorización de uso del producto farmacéutico lacosamida no incluido en el Petitorio Farmacológico de EsSalud. ASPECTOS GENERALES: La epilepsia es una condición del sistema nervioso central caracterizada por crisis epilépticas recurrentes y no provocadas por desencadenantes inmediatos identificables. Así, la crisis epiléptica es aquel acontecimiento transitorio de signos y/o síntomas originados por una actividad neuronal cerebral sincrónica anormal o excesiva, que puede manifestarse por fenómenos sensitivos, motores, sensoriales o autonómicos con o sin pérdida de la conciencia, ya que dependen del área cerebral donde se originan. En ese sentido, las crisis convulsivas se clasifican según tres posibilidades de origen: las de inicio focal, generalizado y desconocido. Las crisis focales, a su vez, se pueden subclasificar en aquellas que tienen pérdida o no de la consciencia, para posteriormente categorizar si los síntomas son motores o no motores. En consecuencia, los especialistas deciden el abordaje terapéutico de los pacientes con epilepsia focal teniendo en cuenta esta clasificación, adicional a la etiología y a las comorbilidades asociadas (Reséndiz-Aparicio et al.,2019, Fisher et al.,2017, INSN.,2020). En todo el mundo, la epilepsia afecta aproximadamente a 65 millones de personas, reportándose una incidencia de la epilepsia de 67,8 por 100 000 habitantes en los países en desarrollo (Mohammadzadeh et al., 2022). En el Perú, se estima que la prevalencia de epilepsia es de 11,9 a 32,1 por cada 1000 personas (Burneo et al., 2017). Asimismo, es conocido que la incidencia de la epilepsia en la población pediátrica es de aproximadamente 0,5 % a 1 % de la población general. Además, algunos estudios sugieren que hasta el 60 % de los pacientes pediátricos con epilepsia presentarán remisión de su condición, mientras que alrededor del 20 % a 30 % de los pacientes con epilepsia serán refractarios al tratamiento médico (Ortiz de la Rosa et al., 2015). METODOLOGÍA: La búsqueda bibliográfica exhaustiva se llevó a cabo con el objetivo de identificar la mejor evidencia disponible sobre la eficacia y seguridad de lacosamida para el tratamiento de pacientes pediátricos con epilepsia focal refractaria a los FAE disponibles en EsSalud. La búsqueda bibliográfica se realizó en las bases de datos PubMed, The Cochrane Library. Web of Science y LILACS. Adicionalmente, se amplió la búsqueda revisando la evidencia generada por grupos internacionales que realizan revisiones sistemáticas (RS), evaluaciones de tecnologías sanitarias (ETS) y guías de práctica clínica (GPC) de: la National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), la American Academy of Neurology (ANN), la American Epilepsy Society (AES), la Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), la Internacional Database of GRADE Guideline (BIGG), la Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), la Comissáo Nacional de Incorporadáo de Tecnologias no Sistema Único de Saúde (CONITEC) y el Ministerio de Salud del Perú (MINSA). Adicionalmente, se realizó una búsqueda manual en las bases el portal de la Base Regional de Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud de las Américas (BRISA), y el repositorio institucional de la Dirección General de Medicamentos, Insumos y Drogas (DIGEMID). Finalmente, se realizó una búsqueda en el portal ClinicalTrials.govdel National Institutes of Health (NIH) para identificar ensayos clínicos en desarrollo o que aún no hayan sido publicados. La metodología de tipo escalonada fue utilizada para la selección de documentos a ser incluidos en el presente dictamen. De acuerdo con los criterios de elegibilidad, se priorizaron durante la selección: GPC, ETS, RS de ensayos clínicos (EC) con o sin metaanálisis (MA), y ensayos clínicos aleatorizados (ECA) de fase III. Se elaboraron estrategias de búsqueda sensibles en bases de datos bibliográficas y sitios web para obtener la evidencia científica que permita responder a la pregunta PICO. Las estrategias de búsqueda incluyeron términos relacionados con la intervención y población de interés. Se emplearon términos MeSH4, así como términos de lenguaje libre, junto con operadores booleanos para cada una de las bases de datos elegidas para la búsqueda. Los registros obtenidos de la búsqueda bibliográfica fueron importados al aplicativo web Rayyan (http://rayyan.qcri.org/) para una revisión manual por título y resumen. La selección de los estudios se realizó en una primera fase por dos evaluadores del Equipo Técnico del IETSI de manera independiente (búsqueda par); evaluando los títulos y resúmenes en relación con la pregunta PICO y seleccionando aquellos que serían evaluados a texto completo en una segunda fase por un único evaluador. En la segunda fase, uno de los evaluadores revisó los documentos a texto completo incluidos en la primera fase y realizó la selección final de los estudios. RESULTADOS: Luego de la búsqueda bibliográfica, se incluyó una GPC elaborada por la National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE 2022), y un ECA de fase III, NCT01921205 (Farkas et al., 2019). CONCLUSIÓN: Por lo expuesto, el Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación aprueba el uso de lacosamida para el tratamiento complementario en pacientes pediátricos con epilepsia focal refractaria, como producto farmacéutico no incluido en el Petitorio Farmacológico de EsSalud, según lo establecido en el Anexo N° 1. La vigencia del presente informe preliminar es de un año a partir de la fecha de publicación. Así, la continuación de dicha aprobación estará sujeta a la evaluación de los resultados obtenidos y de mayor evidencia que pueda surgir en el tiempo.

Cannabis-based magistral formulation is highly effective as an adjuvant treatment in drug-resistant focal epilepsy in adult patients: an open-label prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: The safety and efficacy of a formulation high in cannabidiol (CBD) and low in ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) to treat drug-resistant epilepsy have been examined previously in children, but not in adult population. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether CBD-rich oil, as an add-on treatment to conventional antiepileptic drugs, was effective, safe, and well-tolerated in adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy (DRFE). METHODS: An open-label, prospective cohort, single-center in adult patients with DRFE, were receiving stable doses of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). A cannabis based-magistral formulation (CBMF) (100 mg/ml CBD and THC <1.9 mg/ml) was administrated 0.1 ml sublingually every 12 hours, up-titrated weekly. The primary outcome was to establish a reduction in seizures frequency >50% at 12 weeks. Adverse-drug reactions monitoring was done. p-value <0.05 was statistically significant. RESULTS: Between August 2020 and July 2022, 44 (38.6%) patients completed >3 months of follow-up. The median daily dose of CBD was 200 mg, that of THC was 4 mg, and that of CBD per kilogram of weight was 3.7 mg. The median number of seizures per month before CBD treatment was 11, and after CBD treatment was 2.5 (p<0.001). A reduction in seizures >50% at 12 week was achieved in 79.5% of the patients. The median percentage change in seizure frequency per month was 84.1% at 12 weeks. Five patients reported any adverse-drug reactions. CONCLUSION: The CBMF is a highly effective and safety therapy to treat adult patients with DRFE. The reduction in seizures frequency is maintained over time.

Cutaneous Hypersensitivity Reaction After Phenytoin Therapy in a Neonate: A Case Report and Review of Literature Elucidating the Potential Pharmacological Plausibility and Preventive Strategies.

BACKGROUND: Drug-induced hypersensitivity reaction is a potentially life-threatening condition reported among patients of different age groups. Phenytoin is a prototypic drug prescribed for the treatment of a variety of seizure disorders. Allergic reaction to phenytoin therapy in a newborn is relatively a rare clinical manifestation that is not frequently reported. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to report a suspected case of hypersensitivity reaction in a newborn possibly due to phenytoin and the strategies to prevent these immune-mediated reactions. CASE REPORT: An early term newborn on the 4th day of life developed erythematous rashes over the abdominal region following phenytoin treatment for recurrent generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Prenatal history was uneventful except for the mother had preeclampsia during the third trimester of pregnancy. The suspected phenytoin was replaced with phenobarbitone to control seizure episodes. Subsequently, the rashes disappeared. The baby had also suffered from skin discolouration after phototherapy. Radiological investigations and cerebrospinal fluid culture were performed to detect the etiology of seizures. CONCLUSION: Hypersensitivity reaction to phenytoin in newborns is a rare clinical entity but may lead to serious lethal complications. Thus, stringent clinical monitoring of patients on phenytoin therapy is mandatory, especially in the pediatric population.

Coffee consumption and seizure frequency in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relation between coffee consumption and seizure frequency in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of data collected in the SAVE study, which included patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy during long-term EEG monitoring. Patients in whom both coffee consumption and data about seizure frequency, including focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS), were available were selected. Coffee consumption was collected using a standardized self-report questionnaire and classified into four groups: none, rare (from less than 1 cup/week to up 3 cups/week), moderate (from 4 cups/week to 3 cups/day), and high (more than 4 cups/day). RESULTS: Six hundred and nineteen patients were included. There was no relation between coffee consumption and total seizure frequency (p = 0.902). In contrast, the number of FBTCS reported over the past year was significantly associated with usual coffee consumption (p = 0.029). Specifically, number of FBCTS in patients who reported moderate coffee consumption was lower than in others. In comparison with patients with moderate coffee consumption, the odds ratio (95%CI) for reporting at least 1 FBTCS per year was 1.6 (1.03-2.49) in patients who never take coffee, 1.62 (1.02-2.57) in those with rare consumption and 2.05 (1.24-3.4) in those with high consumption. Multiple ordinal logistic regression showed a trend toward an association between coffee consumption and number of FBTCS (p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our data suggest that effect of coffee consumption on seizures might depend on dose with potential benefits on FBTCS frequency at moderate doses. These results will have to be confirmed by prospective studies.

Clinico-laboratory characteristics and outcome of patients with eucalyptus oil-induced/provoked seizures: A case series and systematic review of the published patients.

Seizures triggered by skin application, inhalation or ingestion of over-the-counter medications containing eucalyptus oil are known. We report five children who suffered likewise. We made a systematic search for all reported cases and performed a pooled analysis to provide a comprehensive estimate of the type of seizures, their management and outcome. In 110 cases (49 children), inhalational use was the most predominant, generalised tonic-clonic (the commonest semiology) and levetiracetam was the most common anti-convulsant treatment used. Most cases had an uneventful recovery. Adults were less likely to have prolonged and multiple seizures, requiring intensive care or mechanical ventilation.

Treating of focal epilepsy: a patent review.

Focal epilepsy is one of the most frequent specific type of epilepsies, with 30% treatment-resistant patients. There are several directions researchers can follow to improve existing treatment of focal epilepsy: synthesis of new compounds with anticonvulsant activity, repurposing drugs approved for other indications, finding drugs targeted to specific genetic and biochemical defects that underlie focal epilepsy syndromes, development of viral vectors for specific gene therapy, creation of devices and methods for suppression of seizures by electrostimulation and development of methods to increase safety of epilepsy surgery. Improvement of efficacy and safety of current therapies is necessary, as well as developing targeted treatment of genetic epilepsy syndromes that will not only suppress seizures, but stop further epileptogenesis.

An Open Pilot Study of the Effect and Tolerability of Add-On Multivitamin Therapy in Patients with Intractable Focal Epilepsy.

Observational studies have investigated the potential modulatory effect of neuronal excitability by vitamins in epilepsy. We aimed to investigate whether the addition of multivitamin therapy (B6/B9, D, E and Q) to regular antiepileptic drug therapy could ameliorate seizures in patients with refractory focal epilepsy. We conducted a prospective cohort open study to investigate the effect and tolerability of add-on multivitamin therapy (daily dose: B6 100 mg, B9 5 mg, D 1000 IU, E 400 IU and coenzyme Q10 100 mg) in patients with intractable focal epilepsy. All patients had effect and safety assessments at baseline and after one, three and six months of the supplementation. Thirty patients (11 men and 19 women) with a mean age of 42.37 ± 9.40 years were recruited and four patients discontinued. The seizure frequency significantly decreased after the six-month supplementation (9.04 ± 18.16/month and 2.06 ± 3.89/month, p = 0.045). At the final visit, 62.5% of the patients showed a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency, and 12.5% were seizure-free. As to safety and tolerability, most patients did not experience significant adverse events, although three patients reported seizure worsening. In conclusion, this pilot study demonstrated the therapeutic potential and essentially good tolerability of add-on multivitamin therapy in patients with refractory focal epilepsy.

Antiepileptic Drug Treatment Patterns in Women of Childbearing Age With Epilepsy.

Importance: Limited population-based data are available on antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment patterns in women of childbearing age with epilepsy; the current population risk is not clear. Objectives: To examine the AED treatment patterns and identify differences in use of valproate sodium and topiramate by comorbidities among women of childbearing age with epilepsy. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study used a nationwide commercial database and supplemental Medicare as well as Medicaid insurance claims data to identify 46 767 women with epilepsy aged 15 to 44 years. The eligible study cohort was enrolled between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2013. Data analysis was conducted from January 1, 2017, to February 22, 2018. Exposures: Cases required an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification-coded epilepsy diagnosis with continuous medical and pharmacy enrollment. Incident cases required a baseline of 2 or more years without an epilepsy diagnosis or AED prescription before the index date. For both incident and prevalent cases, focal and generalized epilepsy cohorts were matched by age, payer type, and enrollment period and then compared. Main Outcomes and Measures: Antiepileptic drug treatment pattern according to seizure type and comorbidities. Results: Of the 46 767 patients identified, there were 8003 incident cases (mean [SD] age, 27.3 [9.4] years) and 38 764 prevalent cases (mean [SD] age, 29.7 [9.0] years). Among 3219 women in the incident epilepsy group who received AEDs for 90 days or more, 3173 (98.6%) received monotherapy as first-line treatment; among 28 239 treated prevalent cases, 18 987 (67.2%) received monotherapy. In 3544 (44.3%) incident cases and 9480 (24.5%) prevalent cases, AED treatment was not documented during 180 days or more of follow-up after diagnosis. Valproate (incident: 35 [5.81%]; prevalent: 514 [13.1%]) and phenytoin (incident: 33 [5.48%]; prevalent: 178 [4.53%]) were more commonly used for generalized epilepsy and oxcarbazepine (incident: 53 [8.03%]; prevalent: 386 [9.89%]) was more often used for focal epilepsy. Levetiracetam (incident: focal, 267 [40.5%]; generalized, 271 [45.0%]; prevalent: focal, 794 [20.3%]; generalized, 871 [22.2%]), lamotrigine (incident: focal, 123 [18.6%]; generalized, 106 [17.6%]; prevalent: focal, 968 [24.8%]; generalized, 871 [22.2%]), and topiramate (incident: focal, 102 [15.5%]; generalized, 64 [10.6%]; prevalent: focal, 499 [12.8%]; generalized, 470 [12.0%]) were leading AEDs prescribed for both focal and generalized epilepsy. Valproate was more commonly prescribed for women with comorbid headache or migraine (incident: 53 of 1251 [4.2%]; prevalent: 839 of 8046 [10.4%]), mood disorder (incident: 63 of 860 [7.3%]; prevalent: 1110 of 6995 [15.9%]), and anxiety and dissociative disorders (incident: 57 of 881 [6.5%]; prevalent: 798 of 5912 [13.5%]). Topiramate was more likely prescribed for those with comorbid headache or migraine (incident: 335 of 1251 [26.8%]; prevalent: 2322 of 8046 [28.9%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Many women appear to be treated with valproate and topiramate despite known teratogenicity risks. Comorbidities may affect selecting certain AEDs despite their teratogenicity risks.

Development and pharmacologic characterization of the rat 6 Hz model of partial seizures.

OBJECTIVE: The mouse 6 Hz model of psychomotor seizures is a well-established and commonly used preclinical model for antiseizure drug (ASD) discovery. Despite its widespread use both in the identification and differentiation of novel ASDs in mice, a corresponding assay in rats has not been developed. We established a method for 6 Hz seizure induction in rats, with seizure behaviors similar to those observed in mice including head nod, jaw clonus, and forelimb clonus. METHODS: A convulsive current that elicits these seizure behaviors in 97% of rats (CC97 ) was determined using a Probit analysis. Numerous prototype ASDs were evaluated in this model using stimulus intensities of 1.5× and 2× the CC97 , which is comparable to the approach used in the mouse 6 Hz seizure model (e.g., 32 and 44 mA stimulus intensities). The ASDs evaluated include carbamazepine, clobazam, clonazepam, eslicarbazepine, ethosuximide, ezogabine, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, phenobarbital, phenytoin, rufinamide, tiagabine, topiramate, and sodium valproate. Median effective dose (ED50 ) and median toxic (motor impairment) dose (TD50 ) values were obtained for each compound. RESULTS: Compounds that were effective at the 1.5 × CC97 stimulus intensity at protective index (PI) values >1 included clobazam, ethosuximide, ezogabine, levetiracetam, phenobarbital, and sodium valproate. Compounds that were effective at the 2 × CC97 stimulus intensity at PI values >1 included ezogabine, phenobarbital, and sodium valproate. SIGNIFICANCE: In a manner similar to the use of the mouse 6 Hz model, development of a rat 6 Hz test will aid in the differentiation of ASDs, as well as in study design and dose selection for chronic rat models of pharmacoresistant epilepsy. The limited number of established ASDs with demonstrable efficacy at the higher stimulus intensity suggests that, like the mouse 6 Hz 44 mA model, the rat 6 Hz seizure model may be a useful screening tool for pharmacoresistant seizures.

Guideline conform initial monotherapy increases in patients with focal epilepsy: A population-based study on German health insurance data.

PURPOSE: To examine the implementation of the clinical practice guideline "first epileptic seizure and epilepsy in adulthood" published in 2008 to patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy between 2008 and 2014. METHOD: This retrospective, population-based analysis was performed on patient data of 4.1 million insurants from the German statutory health insurance. Prevalent and incident cases in adults were identified based on ICD-10 codes, using a hierarchical diagnosis selection algorithm. The first anticonvulsive agent in a newly diagnosed epilepsy patient was validated against the clinical practice guideline. RESULTS: We determined an annual crude prevalence rate in adults between 0.946% and 1.090% and incidence rates of at least 156 per 100,000. A significant increase in guideline compliant monotherapy was found in patients with a focal epilepsy syndrome, while, among patients with idiopathic generalised epilepsies, the share of guideline noncompliant monotherapy increased. Both changes are likely due to the overall increase in prescription of levetiracetam from 19.6% in 2008 to 58.9% in 2014 in all newly treated patients. Overall, the proportion of enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants fell significantly from 20.7% in 2008 to 4.3% in 2014 (p<0.001). The likelihood to receive non-enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs was 5.82 (95% CI 4.62-7.33) higher in 2014 than in 2008. CONCLUSION: Initial monotherapy for focal epilepsy is in line with current clinical practice guidelines and mainly implemented by prescription of levetiracetam. Further evaluations should address the question of whether patients treated in line with the guidelines have a favorable outcome, compared to patients not treated in line with current guidelines.

Usefulness of ketogenic diet in a girl with migrating partial seizures in infancy.

Migrating partial seizures in infancy (MPSI) are an age-specific epilepsy syndrome characterized by migrating focal seizures, which are intractable to various antiepileptic drugs and cause severe developmental delay. We report a case of MPSI with heterozygous missense mutation in KCNT1, which was successfully managed by ketogenic diet. At age 2months, the patient developed epilepsy initially manifesting focal seizures with eye deviation and apnea, then evolving to secondarily generalized clonic convulsion. Various antiepileptic drugs including phenytoin, valproic acid, zonisamide, clobazam, levetiracetam, vitamin B6, and carbamazepine were not effective, but high-dose phenobarbital allowed discontinuation of midazolam infusion. Ictal scalp electroencephalogram showed migrating focal seizures. MPSI was suspected and she was transferred to our hospital for further treatment. Potassium bromide (KBr) was partially effective, but the effect was transient. High-dose KBr caused severe adverse effects such as over-sedation and hypercapnia, with no further effects on the seizures. At age 9months, we started a ketogenic diet, which improved seizure frequency and severity without obvious adverse effects, allowing her to be discharged from hospital. Ketogenic diet should be tried in patients with MPSI unresponsive to antiepileptic drugs. In MPSI, the difference in treatment response in patients with and those without KCNT1 mutation remains unknown. Accumulation of case reports would contribute to establish effective treatment options for MPSI.

Pure cannabidiol in the treatment of malignant migrating partial seizures in infancy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Malignant migrating partial seizures in infancy is a devastating pharmacoresistent epileptic encephalopathy of unknown etiology characterized by onset in the first 6 months of life, continuous migrating focal seizures with corresponding multifocal electroencephalographic discharges, developmental deterioration, and early mortality. Recent widespread interest in the nonpsychoactive component of the cannabis plant, cannabidiol, as a potential treatment for refractory devastating epilepsies has led to individual trials initiated by families or physicians in states that have legalized medical marijuana with anecdotal success. PATIENT DESCRIPTION: We describe a now 10-month-old boy with malignant migrating partial seizures in infancy who made developmental gains and demonstrated sustained seizure reduction with the addition of cannabidiol to his antiepileptic regimen. CONCLUSION: This report supports a role for cannabidiol in the treatment of malignant migrating partial seizures in infancy.

On-demand pulsatile intracerebral delivery of carisbamate with closed-loop direct neurostimulation therapy in an electrically induced self-sustained focal-onset epilepsy rat model.

OBJECT: The authors evaluated the preclinical feasibility of acutely stabilizing an active bihemispheric limbic epileptic circuit using closed-loop direct neurostimulation therapy in tandem with "on-demand'" convection-enhanced intracerebral delivery of the antiepileptic drug (AED) carisbamate. A rat model of electrically induced self-sustained focal-onset epilepsy was employed. METHODS: A 16-contact depth-recording microelectrode was implanted bilaterally in the dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus of Fischer 344 rats. The right microelectrode array included an integrated microcatheter for drug delivery at the distal tip. Bihemispheric spontaneous self-sustained limbic status epilepticus (SSLSE) was induced in freely moving rats using a 90-minute stimulation paradigm delivered to the right medial perforant white matter pathway. Immediately following SSLSE induction, closed-loop right PP stimulation therapy concurrent with on-demand nanoboluses of the AED [(14)C]-carisbamate (n = 4), or on-demand [(14)C]-carisbamate alone (n = 4), was introduced for a mean of 10 hours. In addition, 2 reference groups received either closed-loop stimulation therapy alone (n = 4) or stimulation therapy with saline vehicle only (n = 4). All animals were sacrificed after completing the specified therapy regimen. In situ [(14)C]-autoradiography was used to determine AED distribution. RESULTS: Closed-loop direct stimulation therapy delivered unilaterally in the right PP aborted ictal runs detected in either ipsi- or contralateral hippocampi. Freely moving rats receiving closed-loop direct stimulation therapy with ondemand intracerebral carisbamate delivery experienced a significant reduction in seizure frequency (p < 0.001) and minimized seizure frequency variability during the final 50% of the therapy/recording session compared with closed-loop stimulation therapy alone. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral closed-loop direct stimulation therapy delivered to afferent hippocampal white matter pathways concurrent with on-demand ipsilateral intracerebral delivery of nano-bolused carisbamate can rapidly decrease the frequency of electrographic seizures in an active bihemispheric epileptic network. Additionally, direct pulsatile delivery of carisbamate can stabilize seizure frequency variability compared with direct stimulation therapy alone.

Early add-on treatment vs alternative monotherapy in patients with partial epilepsy.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of two different therapeutic strategies in patients with partial seizures who were intractable to the first prescribed antiepileptic drug (AED); alternative monotherapy vs early add-on treatment. METHODS: We conducted an open, cluster-randomised, prospective, controlled trial in patients with persistent partial seizures, despite treatment with one AED, who were never administered any other AEDs. Neurologists were randomised to two strategies: in group A, an alternative monotherapy with a second AED was employed; in group B, add-on treatment with a second AED was employed. The primary outcome was the percentage of seizure-free patients during a two-month period after six months of treatment. The secondary outcomes were: (i) the percentage of patients achieving a 50% reduction in the number of seizures at six months; (ii) the quality of life based on the Quality Of Life In Epilepsy scale; and (iii) tolerability. RESULTS: A total of 143 neurologists were included and randomised, and 264 patients were evaluated. At six months, the primary outcome was 51% in group A and 45% in group B (p=0.34). The percentage of patients achieving a 50% reduction in the number of seizures at six months was 76% in group A and 84% in group B (p=0.53). The quality of life and the tolerability did not significantly differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Alternative monotherapy or early treatment initiation with another AED drug resulted in similar efficacy, and the side effects associated with monotherapy and combined therapies were similar, which suggests that individual susceptibility is more important than the number and burden of AEDs used.

[Vagus nerve stimulation in patients with migraine]. / Estimulacion del nervio vago en pacientes migrañosos.

INTRODUCTION: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been approved for the treatment of refractory epilepsy when resective surgery is not possible, and has proved to be highly effective. Series published in the literature suggest a beneficial effect of VNS in the treatment of migraine. AIMS: To determine the degree to which headaches improve in patients with migraine after the placement of VNS to treat refractory epilepsy, and to evaluate what variables are associated with an increased chance of success with this measure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An observation-based retrospective study was conducted from 1st January 1999 until 31st December 2010. Patients with VNS for refractory epilepsy were contacted by telephone, after selecting those who fulfilled International Headache Society criteria for migraine. Data collected included age, gender, year of placement, age at onset of epilepsy and migraine, improvement of seizures and migraine, presence of migraine with aura and coexistence of anxious-depressive syndrome. Ninety-four patients with VNS were contacted and 13 patients with migraine were selected. RESULTS: Following placement of the VNS, the number of episodes of migraine was seen to decrease by at least 50% in nine patients (69%) (p = 0.004) and there was a drop in the number of episodes of migraine in those patients who had also reduced their epileptic seizures (p = 0.012). No statistically significant associations were observed as regards sex, age, length of disease history, existence of migraine with aura or coexistence of anxious-depressive syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: VNS could have beneficial effects for patients with migraine, especially in cases that are difficult to control. Due to the type of study, these conclusions must be taken with caution. Prospective clinical studies are needed before introducing the technique into daily clinical practice.

TITLE: Estimulacion del nervio vago en pacientes migrañosos.Introduccion. La estimulacion del nervio vago (ENV) esta aprobada para el tratamiento de la epilepsia refractaria cuando no es posible cirugia resectiva, con una eficacia bien establecida. Series publicadas sugieren un efecto beneficioso de la ENV en la migraña. Objetivos. Determinar el grado de mejoria de la cefalea en pacientes migrañosos a los que se les habia implantado una ENV para tratamiento de la epilepsia refractaria y evaluar que variables se asocian a mayor posibilidad de exito con esta medida. Pacientes y metodos. Estudio observacional y retrospectivo desde el 1 de enero de 1999 hasta el 31 de diciembre de 2010. Se contacto telefonicamente con los pacientes con ENV para epilepsia refractaria, seleccionando a aquellos que cumplian los criterios de la Sociedad Internacional de Cefaleas para la migraña. Se recogieron edad, genero, año de implantacion, edad de inicio de la epilepsia y la migraña, mejoria de crisis y de migraña, presencia de aura migrañosa y coexistencia de sindrome ansiosodepresivo. Se contacto con 94 pacientes con ENV y se selecciono a 13 pacientes migrañosos. Resultados. Tras la implantacion de la ENV, se observo una disminucion de al menos el 50% de los episodios de migraña en nueve pacientes (69%) (p = 0,004), asi como una disminucion del numero de episodios de migraña en aquellos pacientes que tambien habian reducido sus crisis epilepticas (p = 0,012). No se observaron asociaciones estadisticamente significativas en cuanto al sexo, edad, tiempo de evolucion, existencia de aura migrañosa o coexistencia de sindrome ansiosodepresivo. Conclusiones. La ENV podria resultar beneficiosa en pacientes con migraña, especialmente en casos de dificil control. Debido al tipo estudio, hay que tomar estas conclusiones con precaucion. Seran necesarios estudios clinicos prospectivos antes de llevarse a la practica clinica habitual.

Mapping repetition suppression of the P50 evoked response to the human cerebral cortex.

OBJECTIVE: The cerebral network subserving repetition suppression (RS) of the P50 auditory evoked response as observed using paired-identical-stimulus (S1-S2) paradigms is not well-described. METHODS: We analyzed S1-S2 data from electrodes placed on the cortices of 64 epilepsy patients. We identified regions with maximal amplitude responses to S1 (i.e., stimulus registration), regions with maximal suppression of responses to S2 relative to S1 (i.e., RS), and regions with no or minimal RS 30-80 ms post stimulation. RESULTS: Several temporal, parietal and cingulate area regions were shown to have significant initial registration activity (i.e., strong P50 response to S1). Moreover, prefrontal, cingulate, and parietal lobe regions not previously proposed to be part of the P50 habituation neural circuitry were found to exhibit significant RS. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that the neural network underlying the initial phases of the RS process may include regions not previously thought to be involved like the parietal and cingulate cortexes. In addition, a significant role for the frontal lobe in mediating this function is supported. SIGNIFICANCE: A number of regions of interest are identified through invasive recording that will allow further probing of the RS function using less invasive technology.

Perampanel, a novel, non-competitive, selective AMPA receptor antagonist as adjunctive therapy for treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures.

INTRODUCTION: In the search for new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), AMPA-type receptor antagonists have a novel target and the potential to improve seizure control in patients with refractory seizures. This article reviews preclinical and clinical data for 2-(2-oxo-1-phenyl-5-pyridin-2-yl-1,2-dihydropyridin-3-yl)benzonitrile, perampanel , a new chemical entity developed for the treatment of partial-onset seizures. AREAS COVERED: Perampanel is a selective, non-competitive AMPA receptor antagonist. The preclinical profile of perampanel and its clinical development are reviewed. EXPERT OPINION: Unlike many traditional AEDs, perampanel demonstrated efficacy in a broad spectrum of preclinical seizure models. Phase I and II clinical studies suggested perampanel had a favorable safety and tolerability profile and demonstrated proof of concept for its mechanism of action in patients with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures. Three Phase III studies have additionally demonstrated that adjunctive perampanel 4 - 12 mg/day is well-tolerated and significantly improves seizure control in these patients. Median reductions in seizure frequency were 23.3% (4 mg), 26.3 - 30.8% (8 mg) and 17.6 - 34.5% (12 mg) versus 9.7 - 21.0% for placebo. Responder rates were 28.5% (4 mg), 33.3 - 37.6% (8 mg) and 33.9 - 36.1% (12 mg) versus 14.7 - 26.4% for placebo. Perampanel may offer an alternative treatment option in the management of patients with refractory partial-onset seizures.