Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
2.
Reprod Health ; 14(1): 63, 2017 May 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28521830

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The physical and psychological impact of female genital mutilation / cutting (FGM/C) can be substantial, long term, and irreversible. Parts of the health sector in Australia have developed guidelines in the management of FGM/C, but large gaps exist in community and professional knowledge of the consequences and treatment of FGM/C. The prevalence of FGM/C amongst Australian women is unknown. Our article reviews the literature on research on FGM/C in Australia, which focuses on health system response to women and girls with FGM/C. Recommendations are made for policy reform in health, legislation, and community programs to provide the best healthcare, protect children, and help communities abandon this harmful practice. MAIN BODY: Midwives and doctors in Australia acknowledged a lack of knowledge on FGM/C, clinical guidelines and consequences for maternity care. In a metropolitan Australian hospital with specialised FGM/C care, women with FGM/C had similar obstetric outcomes as women without FGM/C, underlining the importance of holistic FGM/C clinics. Greater focus on integration of refugee and migrant populations into their new cultures may be an important way of facilitating the abandonment of this practice, as is education of communities that practise FGM/C, and experts involved in the care and protection of children. Men could be important advocates for protecting women and girls from violence and FGM/C through a man-to-man strategy with programs focussing on men's health and other personal issues, education, and communication. The Australian Government has identified gender-based violence as an area of priority and has been implementing a National plan to reduce violence against women and their children 2010-2022. A multidisciplinary network of experts on FGM/C could be established within this taskforce to develop well-defined and rapid referral pathways to care for and protect these children, as well as coordinate education and prevention programs to help communities abandon this harmful practice. CONCLUSION: Countries of migration can be part of the solution for abandonment of FGM/C through community interventions and implementation of national and coordinated training in FGM/C of experts involved in the care and protection of children and women. The global focus on collaboration on research, training and prevention programs should be fostered between countries of FGM/C prevalence and migration.


Subject(s)
Circumcision, Female/legislation & jurisprudence , Evidence-Based Practice/legislation & jurisprudence , Genitalia, Female/surgery , Australia , Female , Humans
3.
Perspect Biol Med ; 55(1): 59-70, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22643716

ABSTRACT

Despite increasing awareness of the ways in which non-epistemic values play roles in science, many scientists remain reluctant to acknowledge values at stake in their own work. Even when research clearly relates to risk assessment and establishing public policy, contexts in which the presence of values is less likely to be contentious, scientists tend to present such research as merely involving empirical questions about what the evidence is. As a result, debates over policy-related science tend to be framed as purely epistemic debates over the state of the evidence. We argue that this neglects the important ways that ethical and social values play legitimate roles in judgments about what we take to be evidence for a particular policy. Using the case of recent disputes about the relative safety of home birth, we argue that although the debate has been framed as a purely scientific one about the empirical evidence for home birth, it actually involves disagreements about underlying value assumptions. If our claims are correct, then in order to move the debate forward, scientists will need to engage in a critical discussion about the values at stake.


Subject(s)
Evidence-Based Practice/ethics , Home Childbirth/ethics , Social Values , Decision Making/ethics , Empirical Research , Evidence-Based Practice/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Home Childbirth/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Midwifery/legislation & jurisprudence , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/prevention & control , Public Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Risk Factors
4.
Cancer Causes Control ; 21(12): 2049-57, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21072580

ABSTRACT

The articles in this monograph illustrate the progress and successes of comprehensive cancer control (CCC) since our 2005 publication. The strides made in CCC demonstrate the energy and commitment of this nationwide movement to reduce the burden of cancer for all people. The purpose of this conclusion paper is to discuss the future of CCC, which promises a new emphasis on policy, primary prevention, public health, evidence-based interventions, and global health supported by advanced communication tools.


Subject(s)
Comprehensive Health Care/trends , Delivery of Health Care/trends , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./legislation & jurisprudence , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./organization & administration , Communications Media , Comprehensive Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Delivery of Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Evidence-Based Practice/legislation & jurisprudence , Evidence-Based Practice/methods , Evidence-Based Practice/trends , Health Care Reform , Health Plan Implementation/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Plan Implementation/organization & administration , Health Plan Implementation/trends , Healthcare Disparities/trends , Humans , Primary Prevention/legislation & jurisprudence , Primary Prevention/organization & administration , Primary Prevention/trends , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL