Treatment Outcome of Severe Respiratory Type B Tularemia Using Fluoroquinolones.

BACKGROUND: Fluoroquinolones lack approval for treatment of tularemia but have been used extensively for milder illness. Here, we evaluated fluoroquinolones for severe illness. METHODS: In an observational study, we identified case-patients with respiratory tularemia from July to November 2010 in Jämtland County, Sweden. We defined severe tularemia by hospitalization for >24 hours and severe bacteremic tularemia by Francisella tularensis subsp. holarctica growth in blood or pleural fluid. Clinical data and drug dosing were retrieved from electronic medical records. Chest images were reexamined. We used Kaplan-Meier curves to evaluate time to defervescence and hospital discharge. RESULTS: Among 67 case-patients (median age, 66 years; 81% males) 30-day mortality was 1.5% (1 of 67). Among 33 hospitalized persons (median age, 71 years; 82% males), 23 had nonbacteremic and 10 had bacteremic severe tularemia. Subpleural round consolidations, mediastinal lymphadenopathy, and unilateral pleural fluid were common on chest computed tomography. Among 29 hospitalized persons with complete outcome data, ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin (n = 12), ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin combinations with doxycycline and/or gentamicin (n = 11), or doxycycline as the single drug (n = 6) was used for treatment. One disease relapse occurred with doxycycline treatment. Treatment responses were rapid, with median fever duration 41.0 hours in nonbacteremic and 115.0 hours in bacteremic tularemia. Increased age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index predicted severe bacteremic tularemia (odds ratio, 2.7 per score-point; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-5.41). A 78-year-old male with comorbidities and delayed ciprofloxacin/gentamicin treatment died. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroquinolone treatment is effective for severe tularemia. Subpleural round consolidations and mediastinal lymphadenopathy were typical findings on computed tomography among case-patients in this study.

Rifampicin does not reduce moxifloxacin concentrations at the site of infection and may not improve treatment outcome of a one-stage exchange surgery protocol of implant-associated osteomyelitis lesions in a porcine model.

We aimed to evaluate moxifloxacin steady-state concentrations in infected bone and soft tissue and to explore the additive microbiological and pathological treatment effect of rifampicin to standard moxifloxacin treatment of implant-associated osteomyelitis (IAO). 16 pigs were included. On Day 0, IAO was induced in the proximal tibia using a susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strain. On Day 7, the pigs underwent one-stage exchange surgery of the IAO lesions and were randomized to receive seven days of intravenous antibiotic treatment of either rifampicin combined with moxifloxacin or moxifloxacin monotherapy. On Day 14, microdialysis was applied for continuous sampling (8 h) of moxifloxacin concentrations. Microbiological, macroscopical pathology, and histopathological analyses were performed postmortem. Steady-state moxifloxacin area under the concentration-time curve was lower in the combination therapy group in plasma (total) and subcutaneous tissue compartments (infected and noninfected) (p < 0.04), while no differences were found in bone compartments. No additional treatment effect of rifampicin to moxifloxacin treatment was found (p = 0.57). Conclusive, additive rifampicin treatment does not reduce moxifloxacin concentrations at the infection site. Rifampicin treatment may not be necessary in a one-stage exchange treatment of IAO. However, our sample size and treatment period may have been too small and short to reveal true clinical differences.

Fluoroquinolone resistance mutations among Mycobacterium tuberculosis and their interconnection with treatment outcome.

Background: Fluoroquinolone (FQ) antibiotics are among the most potent second-line antitubercular drugs these days. The aim of the study was to analyze the frequency and pattern of genetic mutation in preextensive (pre-XDR) and extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis using second-line line probe assay (LPA) and to compare drug-resistant mutations with different treatment outcomes. Methods: Sputum, lymph node aspirate, and cold accesses from patients with rifampicin-resistant Tuberculosis (TB) were subjected to first-line and second-line LPA (Genotype MTBDRsl by Hain Life Science, Germany) to assess additional drug resistance to fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin and moxifloxacin). Final treatment outcomes as per the National TB Elimination Program were assessed and compared with the mutation profile. Results: One hundred and fifty subjects were observed to have mutations associated with resistance to FQs and constituted the final study population. The most frequent mutation observed among GyrA drug resistance mutation was D94G (Gyr A MUT3C, 44/150, 66%) corresponding to high-level resistance to levofloxacin and moxifloxacin. The same mutation was associated with poor treatment outcome as died or treatment failure (odds ratio 2.50, relative risk 1.67, P = 0.043). The most common hetero-resistance mutation pattern observed in GyrA gene was wild type plus Asp94Gly mutation in 24.6% of isolates. Conclusions: GyrA MUT3C hybridization corresponding to single-point mutation of aspartic acid to glycine at codon 94 constitutes the most common mutation in GyrA gene locus in M. tuberculosis with significant association with treatment outcome as died compared to those with treatment outcome as cured.

gyrA Mutations in Mycoplasma genitalium and Their Contribution to Moxifloxacin Failure: Time for the Next Generation of Resistance-Guided Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Although single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in Mycoplasma genitalium parC contribute to fluoroquinolone treatment failure, data are limited for the homologous gene, gyrA. This study investigated the prevalence of gyrA SNPs and their contribution to fluoroquinolone failure. METHODS: Samples from 411 patients (male and female) undergoing treatment for M. genitalium infection (Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, March 2019-February 2020) were analyzed by Sanger sequencing (gyrA and parC). For patients treated with moxifloxacin (n = 194), the association between SNPs and microbiologic treatment outcome was analyzed. RESULTS: The most common parC SNP was G248T/S83I (21.1% of samples), followed by D87N (2.3%). The most common gyrA SNP was G285A/M95I (7.1%). Dual parC/gyrA SNPs were found in 8.6% of cases. One third of infections harboring parC G248T/S83I SNP had a concurrent SNP in gyrA conferring M95I. SNPs in gyrA cooccurred with parC S83I variations. Treatment failure was higher in patients with parC S83I/gyrA dual SNPs when compared with infections with single S83I SNP alone from analysis of (1) 194 cases in this study (81.2% vs 45.8%, P = .047), and (2) pooled analysis of a larger population of 535 cases (80.6% vs 43.2%; P = .0027), indicating a strong additive effect. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with parC S83I SNP alone, M. genitalium infections with dual mutations affecting parC/gyrA had twice the likelihood of failing moxifloxacin. Although antimicrobial resistance varies by region globally, these data indicate that gyrA should be considered as a target for future resistance assays in Australasia. We propose a strategy for the next generation of resistance-guided therapy incorporating parC and gyrA testing.

Safety and Efficacy of Black Tea Extract in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Conjunctivitis: A Rabbit Model.

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and efficacy of black tea extract in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis in a rabbit model and compare it with that of gatifloxacin drops. METHODS: Black tea extract was tested in vitro on bacterial cultures of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Forty-two rabbit eyes were cultured with either MRSA (n=21) or P. aeruginosa (n=21) and further divided into a control group (n=5), a tea group (n=8) treated with black tea extract, and a gatifloxacin group (n=8) treated with 0.3% gatifloxacin eye drops. Conjunctival swabs were collected on the third and fifth days. RESULTS: The tea extract successfully inhibited the growth of both organisms at a concentration of 400 mg/mL. Rabbits in the treatment groups showed a reduction in the clinical index on day 2 (P<0.01), unlike the control group (P=0.1), for both organisms. Resolution of conjunctivitis was achieved on days 4 and 5 in the tea and gatifloxacin groups, respectively. On days 3 and 5, while the control group still showed considerable bacterial growth, the tea and gatifloxacin groups showed its inhibition. CONCLUSION: Tea extract has antimicrobial effects similar to those of gatifloxacin in a rabbit model of conjunctivitis.

Treatment of enteric fever (typhoid and paratyphoid fever) with cephalosporins.

BACKGROUND: Typhoid and paratyphoid (enteric fever) are febrile bacterial illnesses common in many low- and middle-income countries. The World Health Organization (WHO) currently recommends treatment with azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, or ceftriaxone due to widespread resistance to older, first-line antimicrobials. Resistance patterns vary in different locations and are changing over time. Fluoroquinolone resistance in South Asia often precludes the use of ciprofloxacin. Extensively drug-resistant strains of enteric fever have emerged in Pakistan. In some areas of the world, susceptibility to old first-line antimicrobials, such as chloramphenicol, has re-appeared. A Cochrane Review of the use of fluoroquinolones and azithromycin in the treatment of enteric fever has previously been undertaken, but the use of cephalosporins has not been systematically investigated and the optimal choice of drug and duration of treatment are uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of cephalosporins for treating enteric fever in children and adults compared to other antimicrobials. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, the WHO ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov up to 24 November 2021. We also searched reference lists of included trials, contacted researchers working in the field, and contacted relevant organizations. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults and children with enteric fever that compared a cephalosporin to another antimicrobial, a different cephalosporin, or a different treatment duration of the intervention cephalosporin. Enteric fever was diagnosed on the basis of blood culture, bone marrow culture, or molecular tests. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were clinical failure, microbiological failure and relapse. Our secondary outcomes were time to defervescence, duration of hospital admission, convalescent faecal carriage, and adverse effects. We used the GRADE approach to assess certainty of evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS: We included 27 RCTs with 2231 total participants published between 1986 and 2016 across Africa, Asia, Europe, the Middle East and the Caribbean, with comparisons between cephalosporins and other antimicrobials used for the treatment of enteric fever in children and adults. The main comparisons are between antimicrobials in most common clinical use, namely cephalosporins compared to a fluoroquinolone and cephalosporins compared to azithromycin. Cephalosporin (cefixime) versus fluoroquinolones Clinical failure, microbiological failure and relapse may be increased in patients treated with cefixime compared to fluoroquinolones in three small trials published over 14 years ago: clinical failure (risk ratio (RR) 13.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.24 to 55.39; 2 trials, 240 participants; low-certainty evidence); microbiological failure (RR 4.07, 95% CI 0.46 to 36.41; 2 trials, 240 participants; low-certainty evidence); relapse (RR 4.45, 95% CI 1.11 to 17.84; 2 trials, 220 participants; low-certainty evidence). Time to defervescence in participants treated with cefixime may be longer compared to participants treated with fluoroquinolones (mean difference (MD) 1.74 days, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.98, 3 trials, 425 participants; low-certainty evidence). Cephalosporin (ceftriaxone) versus azithromycin Ceftriaxone may result in a decrease in clinical failure compared to azithromycin, and it is unclear whether ceftriaxone has an effect on microbiological failure compared to azithromycin in two small trials published over 18 years ago and in one more recent trial, all conducted in participants under 18 years of age: clinical failure (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.57; 3 trials, 196 participants; low-certainty evidence); microbiological failure (RR 1.95, 95% CI 0.36 to 10.64, 3 trials, 196 participants; very low-certainty evidence). It is unclear whether ceftriaxone increases or decreases relapse compared to azithromycin (RR 10.05, 95% CI 1.93 to 52.38; 3 trials, 185 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Time to defervescence in participants treated with ceftriaxone may be shorter compared to participants treated with azithromycin (mean difference of -0.52 days, 95% CI -0.91 to -0.12; 3 trials, 196 participants; low-certainty evidence). Cephalosporin (ceftriaxone) versus fluoroquinolones It is unclear whether ceftriaxone has an effect on clinical failure, microbiological failure, relapse, and time to defervescence compared to fluoroquinolones in three trials published over 28 years ago and two more recent trials: clinical failure (RR 3.77, 95% CI 0.72 to 19.81; 4 trials, 359 participants; very low-certainty evidence); microbiological failure (RR 1.65, 95% CI 0.40 to 6.83; 3 trials, 316 participants; very low-certainty evidence); relapse (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.31 to 2.92; 3 trials, 297 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and time to defervescence (MD 2.73 days, 95% CI -0.37 to 5.84; 3 trials, 285 participants; very low-certainty evidence). It is unclear whether ceftriaxone decreases convalescent faecal carriage compared to the fluoroquinolone gatifloxacin (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.01 to 3.72; 1 trial, 73 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and length of hospital stay may be longer in participants treated with ceftriaxone compared to participants treated with the fluoroquinolone ofloxacin (mean of 12 days (range 7 to 23 days) in the ceftriaxone group compared to a mean of 9 days (range 6 to 13 days) in the ofloxacin group; 1 trial, 47 participants; low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on very low- to low-certainty evidence, ceftriaxone is an effective treatment for adults and children with enteric fever, with few adverse effects. Trials suggest that there may be no difference in the performance of ceftriaxone compared with azithromycin, fluoroquinolones, or chloramphenicol. Cefixime can also be used for treatment of enteric fever but may not perform as well as fluoroquinolones.  We are unable to draw firm general conclusions on comparative contemporary effectiveness given that most trials were small and conducted over 20 years previously. Clinicians need to take into account current, local resistance patterns in addition to route of administration when choosing an antimicrobial.

Right hip gonococcal septic arthritis treatment with successful transition to oral fluoroquinolone.

We present a case of gonococcal septic arthritis of the right hip diagnosed via synovial fluid cultures. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the synovial fluid demonstrated susceptibility to tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, cefixime and ceftriaxone. Our patient was initially treated with ceftriaxone and was successfully de-escalated to oral levofloxacin to complete the treatment. This case is interesting given the rarity of disseminated gonococcal infections in the 21st century and that most clinical isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae are increasingly resistant to fluoroquinolones.

The clinical treatment of bacterial keratitis: A review of drop instillation regimes.

Bacterial keratitis (BK) presentations are often treated using the commercially available second-generation fluoroquinolones ciprofloxacin 0.3% and ofloxacin 0.3% as monotherapy. The guidelines available for instillation regimes are often not supported by data from clinical studies. This review examines the peer-reviewed clinical studies and compared treatment failure rates for ciprofloxacin 0.3% and ofloxacin 0.3% for BK in relation to Day-1 drop-regimes. From the statistical analysis, this review derived evidence-based clinically applicable minimum drop-regimes for the treatment of BK on Day-1. Lower numbers of drops of ciprofloxacin on Day-1 were significantly associated with increased treatment failure rates (p < 0.002). The derived minimum number of drops on Day for ciprofloxacin on Day-1 was 47 drops, and for ofloxacin 24 drops. The mean number of drops used in the clinical studies was significantly lower than the manufacturers' recommended Day-1 regimes for both ciprofloxacin (p = 0.0006) and ofloxacin (p = 0.048). From Day-3 to -6 of treatment the drop rates for ciprofloxacin relative to recommended rates were higher, and for ofloxacin lower (p = 0.014). The findings of this review were then compared with a representative sample of published guidelines and case studies to determine the validity of applying those drop-regimes in clinical practice. Although the manufacturers' suggested minimum drop-regimes on Day-1 were significantly different (120 drops ciprofloxacin, 34 drops ofloxacin, p < 0.0001), many of the published guidelines suggested the same drop-regime for both fluoroquinolones. The suggested drop numbers on Day-1 for ciprofloxacin in these guidelines and case studies were significantly less than those used in the clinical studies (p = 0.043). Increased treatment failure rates for ciprofloxacin are associated with lower drop numbers on Day-1. The Day-1 dosing rates for ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin should be considered separately, and the regimes suggested in published guidelines and case studies may need be re-considered in light of the findings of this review.

Economic Evaluation of Nemonoxacin, Moxifloxacin and Levofloxacin in the Treatment of Early Community-Acquired Pneumonia with Possible Pulmonary Tuberculosis.

The Chinese community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) Diagnosis and Treatment Guideline 2020 recommends quinolone antibiotics as the initial empirical treatment options for CAP. However, patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) are often misdiagnosed with CAP because of the similarity of symptoms. Moxifloxacin and levofloxacin have inhibitory effects on mycobacterium tuberculosis as compared with nemonoxacin, resulting in delayed diagnosis of PTB. Hence, the aim of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness of nemonoxacin, moxifloxacin and levofloxacin in the treatment of CAP and to determine the value of these treatments in the differential diagnosis of PTB. Primary efficacy data were collected from phase II-III randomized, double-blind, multi-center clinical trials comparing nemonoxacin to moxifloxacin (CTR20130195) and nemonoxacin to levofloxacin (CTR20140439) for the treatment of Chinese CAP patients. A decision tree was constructed to compare the cost-utility among three groups under the perspective of healthcare system. The threshold for willingness to pay (WTP) is 1-3 times GDP per capita ($11,174-33,521). Scenarios including efficacy and cost for CAP patients with a total of 6% undifferentiated PTB. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed to test the robustness of basic analysis. The costs of nemonoxacin, moxifloxacin, and levofloxacin were $903.72, $1053.59, and $1212.06 and the outcomes were 188.7, 188.8, and 188.5 quality-adjusted life days (QALD), respectively. Nemonoxacin and moxifloxacin were dominant compared with levofloxacin, and the ICER of moxifloxacin compared with nemonoxacin was $551,643, which was much greater than WTP; therefore, nemonoxacin was the most cost-effective option. Regarding patients with PTB who were misdiagnosed with CAP, taking nemonoxacin could save $290.76 and $205.51 when compared with moxifloxacin and levofloxacin and resulted in a gain of 2.83 QALDs. Our findings demonstrate that nemonoxacin is the more economical compared with moxifloxacin and levofloxacin, and non-fluoroquinolone antibiotics are cost-saving and utility-increasing compared to fluoroquinolones in the differential diagnosis of PTB, which can help healthcare system in making optimal policies and help clinicians in the medication of patients.

Clinical effectiveness of beta-lactams versus fluoroquinolones as empirical therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus hospitalized for urinary tract infections: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic patients are at risk of severe urinary tract infections (UTIs). Due to the emerging resistance rates to fluoroquinolones and ß-lactams, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ß-lactams versus fluoroquinolones as empirical therapy for diabetic patients hospitalized for UTIs. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a medical center in Taiwan between 2016 and 2018. Patients with type 2 diabetes, aged ≥20 and hospitalized for UTIs were enrolled. Patients with UTI diagnosis within one year before the admission, co-infections at the admission, or ≥2 pathogens in the urine cultures were excluded. The primary outcome was empiric treatment failure. RESULTS: 298 patients were followed for at least 30 days after the admission. Escherichia coli (61.07%) was the most common pathogen. The resistance rates of the pathogens to levofloxacin were 28.52% and 34.22% according to the historical Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoints and the updated 2019 CLSI breakpoints, respectively. The resistance rates of ceftazidime and cefepime were 21.81% and 11.41%, respectively. Empirical ß-lactams were associated with less treatment failure compared to fluoroquinolones (adjusted OR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.17-0.60). Beta-lactams were associated with less treatment failure than fluoroquinolones when appropriatness was determined by the pre-2019 CLSI breakpoints but not the 2019 CLSI breakpoints. CONCLUSIONS: In diabetic patients hospitalized for UTIs, ß-lactams were associated with less empiric treatment failure compared to fluoroquinolones when the resistance rate to fluoroquinolone is higher than ß-lactams. The updated 2019 CLSI breakpoint for fluoroquinolone was better than pre-2019 CLSI breakpoints to correlate with treatment outcomes for hospitalized UTIs in diabetic patients.

Treatment of pigs with enrofloxacin via different oral dosage forms - environmental contaminations and resistance development of Escherichia coli.

BACKGROUND: Antibacterial agents play important roles in the treatment of bacterial infections. However, the development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and carry-over of substances into the environment are several problems arising during oral treatment of bacterial infections. We assessed AMR development in commensal Escherichia coli (E. coli) in enrofloxacin treated and untreated animals. In addition, we examined fluoroquinolone in the plasma and urine of treated and untreated animals, and in sedimentation dust and aerosol. METHODS: In each trial, six pigs were treated with enrofloxacin via powder, granulate or pellet forms in two time periods (days 1-5 and 22-26). Four pigs served as untreated controls. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined to evaluate AMR development. Analysis of enro- and ciprofloxacin was performed with high performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Non-wildtype E. coli (MIC > 0.125 µg/mL) was detected in the pellet treated group after the first treatment period, whereas in the other groups, non-wildtype isolates were found after the second treatment period. E. coli with MIC > 4 µg/mL was found in only the pellet trial. Untreated animals showed similar susceptibility shifts several days later. Bioavailability differed among the treatment forms (granulate > pellet > powder). Enro- and ciprofloxacin were detected in aerosols and sedimentation dust (granulate, powder > pellet). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that the kind of the oral dosage form of antibiotics affects environmental contamination and AMR development in commensal E. coli in treated and untreated pigs.

Delafloxacin for the treatment of adult patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.

INTRODUCTION: Delafloxacin is a novel fluoroquinolone with peculiar characteristics such as a weak acid character, frequent in vitro activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and a low potential for resistance selection compared with other fluoroquinolones. AREAS COVERED: The present narrative review summarizes the available data on the use of delafloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). EXPERT OPINION: Delafloxacin is a novel fluoroquinolone with a unique profile and some interesting characteristics for the treatment of CABP, such as its marked activity against gram-positive bacteria, including MRSA, the possible use as monotherapy (owing to anti-Gram-negative and anti-atypical bacteria activity), the retained activity against many Gram-positive organisms resistant to other fluoroquinolones, and the availability of both oral and intravenous formulations. The results of the DEFINE-CABP phase-3 randomized controlled trial have shown noninferiority of delafloxacin vs. moxifloxacin for the treatment of CABP, thereby providing a further option for this indication. Against this background, future post-marketing experiences remain of crucial importance for further refining the place in therapy of delafloxacin in the real-life management algorithms of CABP, either as first-line option or step-down/outpatient treatment.

Additional Drug Resistance in Patients with Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis in Korea: a Multicenter Study from 2010 to 2019.

BACKGROUND: Drug-resistance surveillance (DRS) data provide key information for building an effective treatment regimen in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). This study was conducted to investigate the patterns and trends of additional drug resistance in MDR-TB patients in South Korea. METHODS: Phenotypic drug susceptibility test (DST) results of MDR-TB patients collected from seven hospitals in South Korea from 2010 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 633 patients with MDR-TB were included in the analysis. Of all patients, 361 (57.0%) were new patients. All patients had additional resistance to a median of three anti-TB drugs. The resistance rates of any fluoroquinolone (FQ), linezolid, and cycloserine were 26.2%, 0.0%, and 6.3%, respectively. The proportions of new patients and resistance rates of most anti-TB drugs did not decrease during the study period. The number of additional resistant drugs was significantly higher in FQ-resistant MDR-TB than in FQ-susceptible MDR-TB (median of 9.0 vs. 2.0). Among 26 patients with results of minimum inhibitory concentrations for bedaquiline (BDQ) and delamanid (DLM), one (3.8%) and three (11.5%) patients were considered resistant to BDQ and DLM with interim critical concentrations, respectively. Based on the DST results, 72.4% and 24.8% of patients were eligible for the World Health Organization's longer and shorter MDR-TB treatment regimen, respectively. CONCLUSION: The proportions of new patients and rates of additional drug resistance in patients with MDR-TB were high and remain stable in South Korea. A nationwide analysis of DRS data is required to provide effective treatment for MDR-TB patients in South Korea.

Whole-genome analysis of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis reveals novel mutations associated with fluoroquinolone resistance.

Multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (M/XDR-TB) remains a global public-health challenge. Known mutations in quinolone resistance-determination regions cannot fully explain phenotypic fluoroquinolone (FQ) resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). The aim of this study was to look for novel mutations in Mtb associated with resistance to FQ drugs using whole-genome sequencing analysis. Whole-genome sequences of 659 Mtb strains, including 214 with phenotypic FQ resistance and 445 pan-susceptible isolates, were explored for mutations associated with FQ resistance overall and with resistance to individual FQ drugs (ofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin). Three novel genes (recC, Rv2005c and PPE59) associated with FQ resistance were identified (P < 0.00001 based on screening analysis and absence of relevant mutations in a pan-susceptible validation set of 360 strains). Nine novel single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), including in gyrB (G5383A and G6773A), gyrA (G7892A), recC (G725900C and G726857T/C), Rv2005c (C2251373G, G2251420C and C2251725T) and PPE59 (C3847269T), were used for diagnostic performance analysis. Enhancing the known SNP set with five of these novel SNPs, including gyrA [G7892A (Leu247Leu)], recC [G725900C (Leu893Leu) and G726857T/C (Arg484Arg)], Rv2005c [G2251420C (Pro205Arg)] and PPE59 [C3847269T (Asn35Asn)] increased the sensitivity of detection of FQ-resistant Mtb from 83.2% (178/214) to 86.9% (186/214) while maintaining 100% specificity (360/360). No specific mutation associated with resistance to only a single drug (ofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin or gatifloxacin) was found. In conclusion, this study reports possible additional mutations associated with FQ resistance in Mtb.

Unusual antibiotic resistance pattern among blood culture isolates of Salmonella Paratyphi A.

INTRODUCTION: With increasing fluoroquinolone resistance, extended spectrum cephalosporins are recommended for the treatment of invasive Salmonella infections. However, Extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) producing Salmonella Paratyphi A causing enteric fever is on the rise and constitutes a major therapeutic challenge. Hence, we aimed to assess the incidence of ESBL production, fluoroquinolone resistance in S. Paratyphi A and to compare the fluoroquinolone resistance detection methods. METHODOLOGY: Seventeen blood-culture isolates of S. Paratyphi A were tested for susceptibility to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, co-trimoxazole, streptomycin and tetracycline (ACCuST), fluoroquinolones, azithromycin and ceftriaxone by disk diffusion method. We compared and correlated between disk diffusion of ciprofloxacin and pefloxacin with ciprofloxacin MIC. Combined disk test was employed to determine ESBL production. RESULTS: In this study, 13(76.5%) isolates were nalidixic acid resistant (NAR), 16 (94.1%) were pefloxacin resistant, while 7 (41.2%), 9 (52.9%) exhibited resistance and intermediate susceptibility to ciprofloxacin respectively. The MIC50, MIC90 of ciprofloxacin was 1 µg/mL, 2 µg/mL respectively. Among the NAR, 76.92% were DSC (MIC 0.5-1 µg/mL) and 23.08% had an MIC of 2-4 µg/mL. Of note, 4 isolates with DSC were NAS. Of the 17 S. Paratyphi A isolates, 14 (82.4%) were ESBL producers and 11 (64.7%) isolates were ceftriaxone susceptible. CONCLUSIONS: Multidrug resistant (AmpRChlRSxtR) S. Paratyphi A with combined resistance to fluoroquinolones and ESBL production is a cause of concern. We found S. Paratyphi A isolates with a relatively unusual phenotype: nalidixic acid susceptible but exhibited DSC; pefloxacin susceptible but ciprofloxacin resistant. Of note one multidrug resistant (AmpRChlRSxtR) isolate, an ESBL producer exhibited resistance to azithromycin, cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones but was susceptible to carbapenems and streptomycin.

Use of repurposed and adjuvant drugs in hospital patients with covid-19: multinational network cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use of repurposed and adjuvant drugs in patients admitted to hospital with covid-19 across three continents. DESIGN: Multinational network cohort study. SETTING: Hospital electronic health records from the United States, Spain, and China, and nationwide claims data from South Korea. PARTICIPANTS: 303 264 patients admitted to hospital with covid-19 from January 2020 to December 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prescriptions or dispensations of any drug on or 30 days after the date of hospital admission for covid-19. RESULTS: Of the 303 264 patients included, 290 131 were from the US, 7599 from South Korea, 5230 from Spain, and 304 from China. 3455 drugs were identified. Common repurposed drugs were hydroxychloroquine (used in from <5 (<2%) patients in China to 2165 (85.1%) in Spain), azithromycin (from 15 (4.9%) in China to 1473 (57.9%) in Spain), combined lopinavir and ritonavir (from 156 (<2%) in the VA-OMOP US to 2,652 (34.9%) in South Korea and 1285 (50.5%) in Spain), and umifenovir (0% in the US, South Korea, and Spain and 238 (78.3%) in China). Use of adjunctive drugs varied greatly, with the five most used treatments being enoxaparin, fluoroquinolones, ceftriaxone, vitamin D, and corticosteroids. Hydroxychloroquine use increased rapidly from March to April 2020 but declined steeply in May to June and remained low for the rest of the year. The use of dexamethasone and corticosteroids increased steadily during 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple drugs were used in the first few months of the covid-19 pandemic, with substantial geographical and temporal variation. Hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, lopinavir-ritonavir, and umifenovir (in China only) were the most prescribed repurposed drugs. Antithrombotics, antibiotics, H2 receptor antagonists, and corticosteroids were often used as adjunctive treatments. Research is needed on the comparative risk and benefit of these treatments in the management of covid-19.

Comparative activities of sitafloxacin against recent clinical isolates in hospitals across China.

Sitafloxacin is one of the newer generation fluoroquinolones. Considering the ever-changing antimicrobial resistance, it is necessary to monitor the activities of sitafloxacin against recent pathogenic isolates. Therefore, we determined the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of sitafloxacin and comparators by broth microdilution or agar dilution method against 1101 clinical isolates collected from 2017 to 2019 in 31 hospitals across China. Sitafloxacin was highly active against gram-positive isolates evidenced by the MICs required to inhibit the growth of 50%/90% isolates (MIC50/90): ≤ 0.03/0.25, ≤ 0.03/0.125, ≤ 0.03/2, 0.125/0.25, 0.25/2, and 0.125/0.125 mg/L for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin-susceptible coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (MSCNS), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), methicillin-resistant CNS, Enterococcus faecalis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae, respectively. Sitafloxacin inhibited 82.8% of the MRSA strains and 97.5% of MRCNS strains. Sitafloxacin was also potent against ciprofloxacin-susceptible Escherichia coli (MIC50/90: ≤ 0.03/0.06 mg/L) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (MIC50/90: ≤ 0.03/0.125 mg/L), non-ESBL-producing E. coli (MIC50/90: ≤ 0.03/1 mg/L) and K. pneumoniae (MIC50/90: ≤ 0.03/0.5 mg/L), Haemophilus influenzae (MIC50/90: ≤0.015/0.06 mg/L), Haemophilus parainfluenzae (MIC50/90: 0.125/0.5 mg/L), Moraxella catarrhalis (MIC50/90: ≤ 0.015/≤ 0.015 mg/L), Bacteroides fragilis (MIC50/90: 0.06/2 mg/L), Peptostreptococcus (MIC50/90: 0.125/4 mg/L), and Mycoplasma pneumoniae (≤ 0.03/≤ 0.03 mg/L). However, sitafloxacin was less active for Enterococcus faecium, ciprofloxacin-resistant and/or ESBL-producing E. coli, and K. pneumoniae strains. Sitafloxacin was superior or comparable to most of the comparators in activities against the abovementioned isolates, so sitafloxacin is still highly active against most of the clinical isolates in hospitals across China, proving its utility in treatment of the abovementioned susceptible strains.

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: Results of a Randomized Trial.

PURPOSE: We sought to determine whether omitting antimicrobial prophylaxis is safe in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate without preoperative pyuria and a preoperative catheter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter randomized controlled trial from September 17, 2017 until December 31, 2019 in 5 hospitals. Patients with pyuria (>100 white blood cells/ml) and a preoperative indwelling catheter were excluded. Postoperative fever was defined as a body temperature ≥38.3C. A noninferiority design was used with a 6% noninferiority margin and null hypothesis (H0) that the infection risk is at least 6% higher in the experimental (E) than in the control (C) group; H0: C (antimicrobial prophylaxis group) - E (no antimicrobial prophylaxis group) ≥ Δ (6% noninferiority margin). A multivariable, logistic regression was performed regarding posttransurethral resection of the prostate fever and antimicrobial prophylaxis with co-variates: (clot-)retention and operating time. The R Project® for statistical computing was used and a p value of 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: Of the patients 474 were included for multivariable analysis and 211/474 (44.5%) received antimicrobial prophylaxis vs 263/474 (55.5%) patients without antimicrobial prophylaxis. Antibiotics were fluoroquinolones in 140/211 (66.4%), cephazolin in 58/211 (27.5%) and amikacin in 13/211 (6.2%) patients. Fever occurred in 9/211 (4.4%) patients with antimicrobial prophylaxis vs 13/263 (4.9%) without antimicrobial prophylaxis (p=0.8, risk difference 0.006 [95% CI -0.003-0.06, relative risk 1.16]). We were able to exclude a meaningful increase in harm associated with omitting antimicrobial prophylaxis (p=0.4; adjusted risk difference 0.016 [95% CI -0.02-0.05]). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate the safety of omitting antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate without preoperative pyuria and a preoperative indwelling catheter.

Moxifloxacin is a safe and effective candidate agent for tuberculosis treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Moxifloxacin is a fourth-generation fluoroquinolone that has shown good antibacterial activity against both gram-positive cocci and gram-negative bacteria. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of moxifloxacin in the drug treatment regimen of patients with tuberculosis. METHODS: We conducted an electronic database search of the PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Controlled Center Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, Baidu Scholar, and Google Scholar for literature related to clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of tuberculosis patients (from the date of inception of the database to September 25, 2020). The experimental group received moxifloxacin while the control group did not use moxifloxacin. After literature screening, data extraction, and literature quality evaluation, the included studies were meta-analyzed using RevMan software 5.1. RESULTS: In total, 13 RCTs involving 7,774 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The negative rate of sputum culture in the experimental group (which received moxifloxacin) was significantly higher than that of the control group after 2 months of treatment [relative risk (RR) =1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-1.18, P<0.0001]. Treatment-related complications in the experimental group were significantly greater than those in the control group (RR =1.34, 95% CI: 1.07-1.67, P=0.01). There was no significant difference in the incidence of serious complications between the two groups (RR =1.09, 95% CI: 0.90-1.33, P=0.38). In addition, there were no significant differences in mortality and recurrence rate between the two groups (RR =0.79, 95% CI: 0.51-1.21, P=0.28; RR =1.41, 95% CI: 0.61-3.25, P=0.42). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis found that the addition of moxifloxacin to the treatment regimen of pulmonary tuberculosis patients could significantly increase the negative rate of sputum culture after treatment; however, it has no significant effect on the recurrence rate. Also, the addition of moxifloxacin was found to increase the incidence of complications, but did not increase the incidence of mortality or serious complications.

Accuracy of molecular drug susceptibility testing amongst tuberculosis patients in Karakalpakstan, Uzbekistan.

OBJECTIVES: In this retrospective study, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of molecular tests (MT) for the detection of DR-TB, compared to the gold standard liquid-based drug susceptibility testing (DST) in Karakalpakstan. METHODS: A total of 6670 specimens received in the Republican TB No 1 Hospital Laboratory of Karakalpakstan between January and July 2017 from new and retreatment patients were analysed. Samples were tested using Xpert MTB/RIF and line probe assays (LPA) for the detection of mutations associated with resistance. The sensitivity and specificity of MTs were calculated relative to results based on DST. RESULTS: The accuracy of MT for detection of rifampicin resistance was high, with sensitivity and specificity over 98%. However, we observed reduced sensitivity of LPA for detection of resistance; 86% for isoniazid (95% CI 82-90%), 86% for fluoroquinolones (95% CI 68-96%), 70% for capreomycin (95% CI 46-88%) and 23% for kanamycin (95% CI 13-35%). CONCLUSIONS: We show that MTs are a useful tool for rapid and safe diagnosis of DR-TB; however, clinicians should be aware of their limitations. Although detection of rifampicin resistance was highly accurate, our data suggest that resistance mutations circulating in the Republic of Karakalpakstan for other drugs were not detected by the methods used here. This merits further investigation.