Diabetes Mellitus: Management of Gastrointestinal Complications.

Gastrointestinal disorders are common complications of diabetes mellitus and include gastroparesis, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and chronic diarrhea. Symptoms of gastroparesis include early satiety, postprandial fullness, nausea, vomiting of undigested food, bloating, and abdominal pain. Gastroparesis is diagnosed based on clinical symptoms and a delay in gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Gastric emptying scintigraphy is the preferred diagnostic test. Treatment involves glucose control, dietary changes, and prokinetic medications when needed. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and its more severe variant, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, are becoming increasingly prevalent in persons with diabetes. Screening for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is not recommended, and most cases are diagnosed when steatosis is found incidentally on imaging or from liver function testing followed by diagnostic ultrasonography. Liver biopsy is the preferred diagnostic test for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Clinical scoring systems are being developed that, when used in conjunction with less invasive imaging, can more accurately predict which patients have severe fibrosis requiring biopsy. Treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease involves weight loss and improved glycemic control; no medications have been approved for treatment of this condition. Diabetes is also a risk factor for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Patients may be asymptomatic or present with atypical symptoms, including globus sensation and dysphagia. Diabetes also may exacerbate hepatitis C and pancreatitis, resulting in more severe complications. Glycemic control improves or reverses most gastrointestinal complications of diabetes.

Temporary gastric neuromodulation for intractable nausea and vomiting.

INTRODUCTION: Gastric neuromodulation (GNM) has been advocated for the treatment of drug refractory gastroparesis or persistent nausea and vomiting in the absence of a mechanical bowel obstruction. There is, however, little in the way of objective data to support its use, particularly with regards to its effects on gastric emptying. METHODS: Six patients (male-to-female ratio: 4:2, mean age: 49 years, range: 44-57 years) underwent the GNM between April and August 2010. Three patients had confirmed slow gastrointestinal transit. Aetiology included previous gastric surgery in two, diabetes in one and idiopathic nausea and vomiting in three patients. GNM pacing wires were placed endoscopically and left in situ for seven days. Patients underwent gastric scintigraphy before and 24 hours after the commencement of GNM. Total gastroparesis symptom scores (TSS), weekly vomiting frequency scores (VFS), health-related quality of life (using the SF-12(®) questionnaire), gastric emptying, nutritional status and weight were compared before and after GNM. RESULTS: TSS improved after GNM in comparison with baseline data. VFS improved in three of four symptomatic patients. The SF-12(®) physical composite score improved in four patients (27.5 vs 34.3) and the mental composite score improved in five patients (34.9 vs 35.9). All patients reported an improvement in oral intake. A significant weight gain (mean: 1kg, range: 0.3-2.4kg) was observed over seven days. Gastric emptying half-time improved in four patients. CONCLUSIONS: GNM improved upper gastrointestinal symptoms, quality of life and nutritional status in patients with intractable nausea and vomiting. GNM merits further investigation.

National survey of physicians' perception of the cause, complications, and management of gastroparesis.

OBJECTIVES: Manifestations of gastroparesis are heterogeneous and clinical complications are poorly defined. Misconceptions of gastroparesis may be common. The objective was to determine physicians' perception of gastroparesis and identify areas that need further research and education. METHODS: A physician survey was prospectively developed and tested. The survey included questions on the etiology, symptoms, management and perceived complications of gastroparesis. Physicians' feedback included rated responses by Likert scale and ranked responses by priority. A total of 3658 surveys were mailed to gastroenterologists and general practitioners using an online physician directory and a local medical society directory. Analysis of variance and t test were utilized. RESULTS: A total of 397 surveys were returned. 85.9% of responses were from the national survey and 14.1% were local. Physicians ranked diabetes (70%) as the most common cause of gastroparesis, followed by idiopathic (21%) and postsurgical (9%). Postprandial epigastric pain (61%) was ranked as the most frequent symptom of gastroparesis, followed by retching/vomiting (20%) and heartburn/regurgitation (19%). 60% believed scintigraphy t1/2 is an accurate measurement of gastric emptying. Only one-third believed gastric electrical stimulation was effective as treatment of gastroparesis. Physicians rated abdominal pain as the most clinically significant complication of gastroparesis surpassing weight loss, hospitalization for dehydration, and malnutrition (P < 0.01). There were small but statistically significant differences between gastroenterologists versus general practitioners and private versus academic physicians. CONCLUSION: More physician awareness and education is needed on gastroparesis and the standardized four-hour gastric scintigraphy method, as well to clarify the management strategy for this condition.

Does grading the severity of gastroparesis based on scintigraphic gastric emptying predict the treatment outcome of patients with gastroparesis?

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were as follows: (1) Whether gastric emptying is different between gastroparesis (GP) patients responding or not responding to standard medical therapy; (2) Identifying if mild, moderate, and severe degrees of gastroparesis based on the scintigraphic gastric emptying test (GET) can predict treatment responses for GP of diabetic (DM) and idiopathic (ID) origin. METHODS: A total of 165 patients (119 F) diagnosed with GP [126 (76%) DM, 39 (24%) ID etiology] failed medical treatment and required the gastric electrical stimulation (GES) device (GES group). In addition, 112 patients (89 F) [37 (33%) DM, 75 (67%) ID] with GP who symptomatically responded to medical therapies are the comparison group (MED GP). All patients underwent a standardized scintigraphic GET consisting of low-fat (2%) isotope labeled egg beaters meal of 250 kcal. We also analyzed the GET data to find cut-off points for different degrees of GP and identified mild (11-20% retention), moderate (21-35%), and severe gastroparesis (>35%) based on percent retention of isotope at 4 h. RESULTS: Overall gastric retention at 4 h was significantly greater in the GES group (45±1.9%) than MED GP (30±2%) (p<0.001). The distribution severity of the GET was different in GES-treated patients than MED treated (p<0.001). In the diabetics, 57% of GES patients retained >35% after 4 h (severe) similar to 43% in the DM MED group. However, 50% of the ID GES patients had retention>35% at 4 h significantly more than only 17% of ID MED GP. Significantly more ID patients who responded to medical therapy had mild gastroparesis and significantly more requiring GES had severe GET (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: (1) GET in patients whose GP symptoms were refractory to standard medical therapy and required GES was significantly slower than in GP patients whose symptoms responded to medical therapy. (2) Stratifying GET into mild, moderate, and severe degrees of gastric retention does not predict whether a medical or surgical approach will be better to control the symptoms of diabetic GP but does correlate with treatment for the idiopathic GP subgroup.

Efficacy of Rikkunshito, a traditional Japanese medicine (Kampo), in treating functional dyspepsia.

BACKGROUND: Rikkunshito, a traditional Japanese (Kampo) medicine, is widely prescribed as an oral preparation for the treatment of functional dyspepsia (FD). In our previous study, we reported that extracorporeal ultrasonography (US) is a useful technique for the assessment of the gastric accommodation reflex (AR) and duodenogastric motility. In this study, we examined the effects of Rikkunshito on the gastroduodenal function in patients with FD. METHODS: Sixteen FD patients (median age, 45 y) underwent US, before and after 14 days of treatment with Rikkunshito (7.5 g b.d.). For assessment of the AR, a cross-sectional area of the proximal stomach was measured after incremental ingestion of a liquid meal up to 400-mL. The expansion rate was used as the parameter to determine the AR. Then, the gastric emptying rate (GER), motility index (MI), and reflux index (RI) were evaluated using previously reported methods. RESULTS: Although no significant changes were observed in the total score of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), the scores of 3 of the 15 symptoms of GSRS decreased significantly after treatment with Rikkunshito. The expansion rate of the proximal stomach was significantly greater after treatment with Rikkunshito than before the treatment. Although the GER and MI increased significantly, no significant differences in the RI were observed after treatment with Rikkunshito. CONCLUSION: These observations suggested that Rikkunshito may be beneficial for the treatment of FD patients with impaired AR and gastric motility. These results also suggested that Rikkunshito has a therapeutic potential for FD and GERD.

Preoperative predictors of significant symptomatic response after 1 year of gastric electrical stimulation for gastroparesis.

BACKGROUND: In cases of gastroparesis where significant symptoms fail to respond to standard medical therapy, gastric electrical stimulation (GES) may be of benefit. Unfortunately, not all patients improve with this therapy. Reliable preoperative predictors of symptomatic response to GES may allow clinicians to offer this expensive and invasive treatment to only those patients most likely to benefit. METHODS: Therapy was initiated in 15 patients more than 12 months prior to this retrospective review of our prospectively maintained data. All patients completed a Total Symptom Score (TSS) survey at every encounter as well as the SF-36 quality-of-life instrument prior to surgery. A failure of GES therapy was considered to have occurred when after 1 year of treatment, preoperative TSS had not decreased by at least 20%. RESULTS: Four patients (4 idiopathic) failed to improve more than 20% on multiple assessments after a year of therapy. All diabetic patients experienced a durable symptomatic improvement with GES. Review of individual items of the TSS revealed that nonresponders experienced less severe vomiting preoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic gastroparesis patients respond best to GES. Responders tend to have more severe vomiting preoperatively. Patients with idiopathic gastroparesis who do not experience severe vomiting should be cautioned about a potentially higher rate of poor response to GES and may be better served with alternative treatments.

Gastroparesis and gastroparesis-like syndrome: response to therapy and its predictors.

PURPOSE: The natural history and outcome of patients with gastroparesis is not well known. The aim of this study was to identify the clinical or pathophysiological characteristics, if any, that may be helpful in predicting therapeutic response in this condition. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of a cohort of patients who presented to a tertiary referral center with symptoms suggestive of gastroparesis. All patients were evaluated by scintigraphic measurement of gastric emptying and symptoms were scored using a modification of the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI). Treatment generally included conservative measures such as antiemetics, prokinetics, tricyclic antidepressants, and analgesics as well as various more invasive interventions in selected patients. Response to treatment was defined as a change in the overall GCSI score of two-thirds or more as compared with baseline. RESULTS: Out of a total of 93 patients, 69 patients met the eligibility criteria. Of these, 29 patients had diabetes mellitus and 40 patients had gastroparesis of nondiabetic etiology. Out of 69 patients, 49 were responders (71%) and 20 were nonresponders (29%). The cause (diabetic versus nondiabetic) of gastroparesis or the presence of delayed emptying did not correlate with response. However, the severity of stomach distension, bloating subscale score, and the global GCSI score at baseline presentation were predictive of response by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Higher global GCSI score, bloating subscale score, and severity of stomach distension at baseline presentation correlated with an unfavorable response in gastroparetic patients. On the other hand, neither the etiology of gastroparesis nor associated delay in gastric emptying appeared to be important in the clinical response. Patients with symptoms of typical gastroparesis but without delays in gastric emptying may have a distinct syndrome with a greater proportion of males than classical gastroparesis.

Refractory gastroparesis after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: surgical treatment with implantable pacemaker.

BACKGROUND: Gastroparesis is a rare complication of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. We evaluate the role of gastric electrical stimulation in medically refractory gastroparesis. METHODS: Patients with refractory gastroparesis after gastric bypass for morbid obesity were studied. After behavioral and anatomic problems were ruled out, the diagnosis of disordered gastric emptying was confirmed by radionuclide gastric emptying. Temporary endoscopic stimulation was used first to assess response before implanting a permanent device. RESULTS: Six patients, all women with mean age of 42 years, were identified. Two patients ultimately had reversal of their surgery with gastro-gastrostomy, while another had a total gastrectomy with persistence of symptoms in all three. Five of the patients evaluated had insertion of a permanent gastric pacemaker, with pacing lead implanted on the gastric pouch (2), the antrum of the reconstructed stomach (1), or the proximal Roux limb (2). Nausea and emesis improved significantly postoperatively; mean total symptom score decreased from 15 to 11 out of 20. There was also a persistent improvement in gastric emptying postoperatively based on radionuclide testing. CONCLUSION: If medical therapy fails, electrical stimulation is a viable option in selected patients with gastroparesis symptoms complicating gastric bypass and should be considered in lieu of reversal surgery or gastrectomy.

Improved nutrition after the detection and treatment of occult gastroparesis in nondiabetic dialysis patients.

Malnutrition in dialysis patients is of multifactorial etiology and is associated with greatly increased morbidity and mortality. A low serum albumin level is one of the most powerful predictors of death and may persist despite optimization of the dialysis prescription. We retrospectively reviewed our experience in improving nutrition in nondiabetic patients with unexplained hypoalbuminemia. Using radionuclide solid-phase gastric emptying scans, we identified 6 patients who had occult gastroparesis. These patients (one on hemodialysis and five on peritoneal dialysis) were then treated with prokinetic medications (erythromycin elixir or metoclopramide) selected on the basis of their effectiveness in improving the scanning results after being given intravenously. Gastric emptying half-times improved from a median of 122 minutes (range, 95 to >300 minutes; normal, < or = 90 minutes) to 12 +/- 2 minutes (mean +/- SEM). The serum albumin increased from 3.3 +/- 0.04 g/dL to 3.7 +/- 0.08 g/dL at 3 months, with every patient's value higher than 3.5 g/dL. This improvement was statistically significant (P = 0.008) over the 5-month period of observation, which encompassed the 2 months before and 3 months after treatment. There was a linear improvement (P = 0.008) that showed a quadratic trend (P = 0.078) for a plateau at the final sampling point. The serum blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and hematocrit levels remained unchanged (P > 0.1). We conclude that gastric emptying scans are valuable in identifying occult gastroparesis in high-risk patients and can guide the selection of prokinetic therapy, which may significantly increase serum albumin levels.