Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 49(7): 101778, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32360485

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Sacrospinofixation is used for fundic vaginal vault's prolapse or to prevent mid-level or posterior prolapse. It can lead to complications such as dyspareunia, chronic pain, and quality of life impairment. Anchoring a posterior isthmic sling to the two sacrospinous ligaments is an alternative to classic Richter's sacrospinofixation. Objective of this study is to report the first cases of vaginal posterior isthmic slings. METHODS: This study is retrospective and unicentric. It includes women who had posterior isthmic sling at the time of a surgery with a mesh for anterior prolapse by vaginal way between 2010 and 2016 in the gynecologic department of a teaching hospital. Report of efficacy and tolerance was performed. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2016, 53 women were included with a posterior isthmic sling and a mesh for an anterior prolapse. POP-Q evolution during the follow-up in the posterior isthmic sling group assess of a good efficacy of the sling. Four women (7.5%) required second surgery in 28 months following initial surgery (only 1 for excision). Four women (7.5%) had a prolapse recurrence in a mean time of 30 months without recurrent surgery. Women's satisfaction level was high (8.0/10 [7,1-8,8]). CONCLUSION: Efficacy and tolerance of the posterior isthmic sling seems good. It might then be an option for mid-level prolapses in case of vaginal surgery with mesh for anterior prolapse. A non-inferiority trial should be performed to be able to conclude on the place of this alternative to Richter's sacrospinofixation.


Subject(s)
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Suburethral Slings , Surgical Mesh , Aged , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Humans , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of Life , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Vagina/surgery
2.
Int Urogynecol J ; 28(11): 1733-1738, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28500515

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and quality of life (QOL) of outpatient mid-urethral tissue fixation system sling (TFS) procedures for urodynamic stress urinary incontinence (SUI) at 3-year follow-up. METHODS: We analyzed 50 mid-urethral TFS sling operations between 2007 and 2012 at Yokohama Motomachi Women's Clinic LUNA. The primary outcome was success defined as a negative 24-h pad test, negative cough and Valsalva stress test, and no re-treatment for SUI. Secondary outcome was improvement in quality of life, which was assessed using the Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire Short Form (IIQ-7). The 3-year postoperative scores were compared with baseline scores using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. A 5% two-sided significance level was used for all statistical testing. RESULTS: All operations were carried out on an outpatient basis with no intraoperative complications. The primary cure rate result at 3-year follow-up was 90%. Median total ICIQ-SF score changed from 12 (6-20) to 0 (0-14) and median total IIQ-7 score changed from 156 (0-300) to 0 (0.00-16.7) at 3-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that the TFS mid-urethral sling operation is a simple, safe, effective procedure that may be done without difficulty at a freestanding clinic on an outpatient basis and favorably improves subjective QOL of the patient.


Subject(s)
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Suburethral Slings , Urinary Incontinence, Stress/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anesthesia, Local , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Quality of Life
3.
Int Urogynecol J ; 25(6): 783-9, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24318563

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: In 2005, a new minimally invasive procedure, the tissue fixation system (TFS) was reported. Like TVT (tension-free vaginal tape), the TFS works by creating a foreign body collagenous tissue reaction that reinforces a weakened pelvic ligament. The objective was to assess the effectiveness and perioperative safety of TFS in a day surgery clinic for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS: The TFS tape was applied in a tunnel adjacent to natural ligaments to repair the anterior cervical ring and cardinal ligament, paravaginal tissues and uterosacral ligaments under local anesthesia/sedation. We prospectively studied 60 patients, mean age 67, between October 2008 and February 2010 at Women's Clinic LUNA. Levels of POP were grade 2 (n = 20; 7 %), grade 3 (n = 30; 55 %), and grade 4 (n = 4; 7 %) according to the ICS POPQ classification. Fifty-four patients (90 %) who underwent a total of 162 POP operations presented for review. Follow-up was performed at 12 months. We defined surgical failure according to the ICS POPQ classification. We used prolapse quality of life (P-QOL) questions for QOL measurement. RESULTS: Ninety-eight percent of patients were discharged on the day of surgery. Of the 162 TFS operations reviewed, 157 were successful and 5 failed. The 5 failed operations comprised 4 cystoceles and 1 rectocele. Two patients developed cervical protrusions at the introitus at 6 months with no prolapse of the uterine body. We found 5 cases of erosion in 162 tape insertions. The total number of patients who had no complications, no surgical failures, no erosions, no sensation of bulging, and no cervical protrusions was 47 (87 %). CONCLUSIONS: The TFS uses the same surgical principle for repair as the TVT; this principle vastly minimizes the volume of mesh used, erosions, and other complications.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Local , Ligaments/surgery , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Aged , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures , Equipment Design , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Humans , Prospective Studies , Remission Induction , Surgical Mesh , Time Factors
4.
Urology ; 79(3): 532-6, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22386392

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate longer-term clinical outcomes after robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort assessment of women undergoing either robotic or abdominal sacrocolpopexy between March 2006 and October 2007. Pelvic floor support was measured using Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) examination, and pelvic floor function was assessed via validated questionnaires, including the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12). RESULTS: The analysis included 51 subjects: 23 robotic and 28 abdominal. Mean time since surgery was 44.2 ± 6.4 months. Postoperative POP-Q improved similarly from baseline in both the robotic and abdominal groups: C (-8 vs -7), Aa (-2.5 vs -2.25), Ap (-2 vs -2) (all P >.05 based on route of surgery). Pelvic floor function also improved similarly in both groups: PFDI-20 (61.0 vs 54.7), PFIQ-7 (19.1 vs 15.7), with high sexual function PISQ-12 (35.1 vs 33.1) (all P >.05 based on route of surgery). Two mesh exposures occurred in each group for a rate of 8% and 7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Robotic sacrocolpopexy demonstrates similar long-term outcomes compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. The robotic approach offers an effective treatment alternative to abdominal sacrocolpopexy for the lasting treatment of advanced POP.


Subject(s)
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Robotics , Aged , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Humans , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Pelvic Floor/physiopathology , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
5.
Semin Reprod Med ; 26(4): 341-8, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18756411

ABSTRACT

Postsurgical adhesion formation has numerous deleterious side effects in a wide variety of surgical settings. Physical barriers used together with laparoscopy were developed in hopes of reducing the tissue trauma seen with open procedures and separating tissues during the critical time of healing to reduce adhesion formation. Despite meticulous techniques by surgeons and the availability of barriers, adhesion formation remains a serious problem, with more than $1 billion spent annually on complications arising from adhesions. Our laboratories have combined a previously marketed drug, Tranilast, with a gel to provide a locally delivered medicated device that can reduce adhesion formation. This article will review the role of Tranilast in the key pathways involved in adhesion formation.


Subject(s)
Peritoneal Diseases/prevention & control , Tissue Adhesions/prevention & control , ortho-Aminobenzoates/therapeutic use , Animals , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Disease Models, Animal , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Equipment and Supplies , Fibrosis/drug therapy , Fibrosis/prevention & control , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Humans , Peritoneal Diseases/metabolism , Peritoneum/drug effects , Peritoneum/pathology , Tissue Adhesions/metabolism , ortho-Aminobenzoates/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL