Management of chronic hand and foot eczema. An Australia/New Zealand Clinical narrative.

Chronic hand/foot eczemas are common, but treatment is often challenging, with widespread dissatisfaction over current available options. Detailed history is important, particularly with regard to potential exposure to irritants and allergens. Patch testing should be regarded as a standard investigation. Individual treatment outcomes and targets, including systemic therapy, should be discussed early with patients, restoring function being the primary goal, with clearing the skin a secondary outcome. Each new treatment, where appropriate, should be considered additive or overlapping to any previous therapy. Management extends beyond mere pharmacological or physical treatment, and requires an encompassing approach including removal or avoidance of causative factors, behavioural changes and social support. To date, there is little evidence to guide sequences or combinations of therapies. Moderately symptomatic patients (e.g. DLQI ≥ 10) should be started on a potent/super-potent topical corticosteroid applied once or twice per day for 4 weeks, with tapering to twice weekly application. If response is inadequate, consider phototherapy, and then a 12-week trial of a retinoid (alitretinoin or acitretin). Second line systemic treatments include methotrexate, ciclosporin and azathioprine. For patients presenting with severe symptomatic disease (DLQI ≥ 15), consider predniso(lo)ne 0.5-1.0 mg/kg/day (or ciclosporin 3 - 5 mg/kg/day) for 4-6 weeks with tapering, and then treating as for moderate disease as above. In non-responders, botulinum toxin and/or iontophoresis, if associated with hyperhidrosis, may sometimes help. Some patients only respond to long-term systemic corticosteroids. The data on sequencing of newer agents, such as dupilumab or JAK inhibitors, are immature.

[Treatment of hand eczema]. / Therapie des Handekzems.

The treatment of hand eczema represents a great challenge in the daily clinical practice for dermatologists. There are various forms of local, physical and systemic treatment, such as alitretinoin which is the only registered systemic treatment option for severe chronic hand eczema. In 2017 dupilumab was approved for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis and can theoretically also be applied for atopic hand eczema. The first and most important step in treatment is to identify the underlying etiology of the hand eczema with the appropriate diagnostic measures, ranging from skin biopsy to allergy testing including occupational products. An important component of treatment is the basic treatment in the form of consistent and stage-adapted skin care. Treatment of hand eczema should follow a step by step procedure whereby the basic treatment should be maintained and, depending on the etiology and clinical type, should be supplemented by topical, systemic and physical treatment forms, also often used in parallel. Mild to moderate forms of hand eczema are usually treated with the basic treatment, emollients and topical glucocorticoids according to various guidelines. In moderate to severe forms of hand eczema UV phototherapy and systemic treatment should be implemented. This article summarizes the most important treatment modalities based on case reports and series, clinical studies, guidelines and expert recommendations.

Natural Thermal Spa Water Versus Hyperthermic Tap Water for Treatment of Recalcitrant Hand Warts in Organ Transplant Recipients: A Patient-Blinded, Comparative Preliminary Study.

OBJECTIVES: Cutaneous warts represent a major problem in organ transplant recipients because of their extensive involvement and persistent course. Current therapeutic modalities often fail to achieve a successful response in patients with warts. We experienced a case involving an organ transplant recipient with recalcitrant mosaic warts who presented with complete clearance of lesions in 3 days after thermal spa bathing. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of natural thermal water versus hyperthermic tap water for treatment of recalcitrant hand warts in organ transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this preliminary study, the right hands of 5 organ transplant recipients with hand warts were immersed in thermal water, while the left hands were soaked in tap water at 44°C to 47°C. Treatment involved three 45-minute sessions per week for 1 month. The total number and size of the warts and the hyperkeratosis severity grade were noted. RESULTS: After 12 sessions, none of the patients exhibited any marked improvement in the size or number of warts, although 3 patients had a slight decrease in their hyperkeratosis severity grade. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data indicate that neither thermal spa water nor hyperthermic tap water is effective for treatment of recalcitrant hand warts in organ transplant recipients. However, new trials using thermal water supplied from different geographical locations should be performed before this observation can be generalized.

Real versus sham proximal biofield therapy in the treatment of warts of the hands and feet in adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (MAGNETIK study).

BACKGROUND: Despite the lack of scientific studies on biofield therapies, they are widely acclaimed by patients. The mechanisms of action are not explained by current allopathic medical approaches. Warts are common and contagious viral lesions that may be refractory to standard dermatologic treatments such as cryotherapy, laser therapy, and keratolytic ointments. Biofield therapies are efficient in various pathologies. Their ability to treat warts has never been demonstrated in a scientific study with a robust methodology. Patients with refractory warts often place their trust in these alternative therapies because of the poor results obtained from traditional medicine. We propose a prospective, randomized, single-blind, assessor-blind trial to evaluate the efficacy of treatment of warts by biofield therapy. METHODS/DESIGN: Subjects with warts on their feet or hands will be randomized into two groups: real biofield therapy versus sham therapy. The diagnosis will be made at the time of inclusion, and follow-up will take place in week 3. Comparison of pictures of the warts at baseline and after 3 weeks will be used as the primary outcome measure. The hypothesis is that the extent of the disappearance of the original wart in the group treated by real biofield therapy will be 70% and that it will be 30% in the group treated by sham therapy. Using 90% power and an alpha risk of 5%, 31 subjects are required in each group for a two-tailed proportion comparison test. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the efficacy of biofield therapy on warts. Therefore, the aim of this study is to extend knowledge of biofield therapy to another area of medicine such as dermatology and to propose complementary or alternative practices to improve patient well-being. The main strength of the study is that it is a randomized, single-blind, assessor-blind, placebo-controlled study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02773719 . Registered on 22 April 2016.

Acral manifestations of contact dermatitis.

Contact dermatitis is a broad term that encompasses both nonimmunologic irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) and immunologically mediated allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Both ICD and ACD can negatively affect a patient's quality of life and are a source of exorbitant medical and societal costs. Avoidance of inciting irritants and/or allergens and liberal use of emollients or humectants are the cornerstone of therapy. When an allergic cause is suspected, patch testing is highly encouraged. In this contribution, we highlight both the commonalities and differences of acral contact dermatitis as it relates to specific regions of the body. In addition, a review of the predisposing conditions, risk factors, and treatment options in the literature is presented to help with the care of these challenging patients.

Liquen nitidus sobre vitíligo: nueva variante del fenómeno de co-respuesta isotópica / Lichen nitidus arising on vitiligo: a new variant of the isotopic coresponse

No disponible

Efficacy and Safety of Topical Pidobenzone 4% as Adjuvant Treatment for Solar Lentigines: Result of a Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: This study aims at the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a combination therapy based on pidobenzone 4% and fractional CO2 laser or cryotherapy in the treatment of solar lentigines and the prevention of eventual posttreatment hyperchromia. METHODS: Efficacy was clinically evaluated by grading the pigmentation level with the Skin Tone Color Scale (STCS), and by grading patients' impression through a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). RESULTS: Our study shows that the associated treatment was safe and that it improves the therapeutic results on solar lentigines and prevents postiatrogenic hyperpigmentation compared with physical therapy alone. CONCLUSION: The combination of cryotherapy and pidobenzone 4% has been found to be the most useful treatment.

Fractional carbon-dioxide (CO2) laser-assisted topical therapy for the treatment of onychomycosis.

BACKGROUND: Inability of topical medications to penetrate via nail plate brings a great challenge to clinicians in treating onychomycosis. Furthermore, oral medications are not appropriate for all patients because of drug interactions, adverse effects, and contraindications. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the clinical efficacy of fractional carbon-dioxide laser-assisted topical therapy for onychomycosis. METHODS: In total, 75 patients with 356 onychomycotic nails confirmed by mycologic examination were included in this study. All the affected nails received 3 sessions of laser therapy at 4-week intervals and once-daily application of terbinafine cream for 3 months. RESULTS: In all, 94.66% and 92% of the treated patients were potassium hydroxide and culture negative, respectively, after 3 months of treatment. However, only 84% and 80% were potassium hydroxide and culture negative, respectively, at 6 months of follow-up. Using Scoring Clinical Index for Onychomycosis electronic calculator, 73.33% of the patients scored higher than 6 and 26.66% of the patients scored 6 or less. Those who scored more than 6 were evaluated clinically and 98.18% of them showed response to treatment at 3 months and 78.18% of them at 6 months of follow-up. LIMITATION: Lack of control group and short duration of follow-up are limitations. CONCLUSIONS: Fractional carbon-dioxide laser therapy combined with topical antifungal was found to be effective in the treatment of onychomycosis. However, randomized clinical studies are needed before it can be widely used in clinics.

Use of 308 nm excimer laser for the treatment of chronic hand and foot eczema.

BACKGROUND: Chronic hand and foot eczema (CHFE), a prevalent debilitating disorder affecting approximately 15% of the population, presents a socioeconomic and psychosocial burden for patients and often follows a chronic course, refractory to conventional therapies. Thus, a large need exists for more effective therapeutics; the excimer laser (308 nm) is effective for some inflammatory skin diseases, but its efficacy has not been evaluated for CHFE. METHODS: The study is a retrospective chart review conducted on 30 patients with recalcitrant CHFE (19 with hand involvement, four with foot involvement, and seven with both) treated twice weekly with excimer laser (308 nm) single wavelength ultraviolet (UV)B radiation between January 2013 and December 2014. RESULTS: Improvements in clinical scores included a 69% reduction in average physician's global assessment (PGA) scores (from 2.77 at baseline to 0.87 after treatment, P < 0.0001) with a parallel reduction in average modified total lesion/symptom scores of 70% (from 10.2 to 3.1, P < 0.0001). Only mild sunburn-like reactions were observed. CONCLUSION: This report evaluates excimer laser for patients with refractory CHFE and shows excellent and sustained efficacy for this treatment. Compared to other UV therapies, excimer laser offers lower cumulative doses of UV radiation by targeting specific areas. This effective treatment should be considered alone or in combination with other established or newer therapies.

Hand dermatitis: a review of clinical features, prevention and treatment.

Hand dermatitis is a socially significant health problem. This review provides a discussion on the clinical features and patterns as well as the differential diagnosis of hand dermatitis, because these are essential for proper diagnosis in clinical practice. The morphology, however, is poorly related to the etiology in chronic cases. In all cases of chronic hand dermatitis, a full diagnostic examination should be undertaken and the etiology should be clarified and addressed in the treatment concept, instead of just moving directly from a morphological diagnosis to therapy. Preventive measures should be included in the treatment concept according to etiology. A stepwise approach for escalating therapy is advised, including basic topical therapy, topical corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, as well as phototherapy and systemic therapy with corticosteroids, alitretinoin, cyclosporine, methotrexate, azathioprine, and others.

Pseudoporphyria following self-medication with chlorophyll.

Two cases of pseudoporphyria are described in which the clinical features of porphyria cutanea tarda occurred in the absence of abnormalities in porphyrin metabolism. Both patients presented with skin fragility and bullae on the dorsal aspect of the hands. The patients consumed a commercial liquid chlorophyll drink in which we detected fluorescent compounds with characteristics typical of previously described chlorophyll derived photosensitisers.

[Whirlpool-dermatitis with "hot hands"]. / Whirlpool-Dermatitis mit "hot hands".

HISTORY AND ADMISSION FINDINGS: A 15-year-old boy presented with painful nodules on his palms and discrete pustules on the forearm. Two days earlier he had taken a bath in a new whirlpool. INVESTIGATIONS: Bacteriological examination of the pustules revealed Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The cervical and axillary lymph nodes were inconspicuous. TREATMENT AND COURSE: The dermal infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa was treated with i.v. piperacillin 4 g/tazobactam 0,5 g twice daily. Furthermore, the patient received 400 mg ibuprofen twice daily per os. Seven days later all symptoms had resolved. CONCLUSION: Hot tubs are a potential source of cutaneous infections with the gram-negative rod Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The most common clinical manifestation of these infections is "hot tub- or jacuzzi-folliculitis" with pustules mainly on the trunk and lymphadenopathy. In children and adolescents, the clinical picture may differ, with a predominance of tender reddish nodules on the palms or soles named "hot hand/hot foot syndrome". In general, the first-line antibiotic in an infection with pseudomonas aeruginosa is ciprofloxacin but it is not recommended in children and adolescents.

Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by coconut fatty acids diethanolamide.

BACKGROUND: Coconut fatty acids diethanolamide [cocamide diethanolamine (cocamide DEA)] is a surface-active derivative of coconut oil that is used in industrial, household and cosmetic products. Cocamide DEA contact allergy has been reported relatively seldom. OBJECTIVES: To describe cocamide DEA-positive patients in an occupational dermatology clinic. METHODS: We retrieved allergic reactions to cocamide DEA from test files, and studied the occupation, exposure, concomitant allergic reactions and diagnoses of the positive patients. RESULTS: Of the 2572 patients tested, 25 (1%) had an allergic reaction to cocamide DEA. Nineteen patients were occupational cases, and 11 worked in the metal industry. Hand cleansers constituted the main source of sensitization (n = 17). Other sources included two dishwashing liquids, one barrier cream, and one metalworking fluid. Three patients reacted to monoethanolamine and 2 to diethanolamine. Diethanolamine is an impurity of cocamide DEA, and can be found in cocamide DEA-containing products and in commercial patch test substances, which may explain some concomitant reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Cocamide DEA allergy is relatively common in patients with occupational hand dermatitis, and mainly derives from hand cleansers. However, exposure to detergents, metalworking fluids and barrier creams must also be taken into account. Concomitant reactions to ethanolamines are possible.

Hand eczema.

Hand eczema is an inflammation of the skin; the cause is often multifactorial. Initial management includes avoiding causative irritants or allergens (e.g., by wearing impermeable gloves) and applying emollients and potent topical glucocorticoids.