Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Contact Dermatitis ; 83(1): 8-18, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32087031

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Most patients with contact allergy to Asteraceae plants are patch test positive to sesquiterpene lactone mix (SLM). There are several reports among these patients of a flare-up of hand eczema after ingestion of food and beverages originating from Asteraceae plants. AIM: To investigate whether German chamomile tea can elicit systemic allergic dermatitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Individuals with or without contact allergy to SLM were patch tested with an extract of German chamomile tea. Six weeks later, they were provoked with capsules containing either freeze-dried German chamomile tea or placebo capsules containing lactose, in a double-blind, randomized study. A numerical rating scale (NRS) was used to ascertain the volunteers' opinion of their hand eczema status. The study individuals were examined to detect a possible flare-up of healed patch test reactions to chamomile. RESULTS: None of the subjects had a flare-up of healed patch test reactions. According to the NRS, SLM-positive individuals experienced a significant worsening of hand eczema, independently of whether they received chamomile or lactose capsules. CONCLUSION: No evidence suggestive of systemic allergic dermatitis was found.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Eating , Hand Dermatoses/etiology , Matricaria/adverse effects , Plant Preparations/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/physiopathology , Double-Blind Method , Female , Hand Dermatoses/physiopathology , Humans , Lactones/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Patch Tests , Plant Preparations/administration & dosage , Random Allocation , Sesquiterpenes/adverse effects
2.
Contact Dermatitis ; 80(1): 45-53, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30246346

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The CARPE registry was set up in 2009 to prospectively investigate the management of patients with chronic hand eczema (CHE). OBJECTIVES: To report comprehensive follow-up data from the CARPE registry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We investigated sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, provision of medical care, physician-assessed outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Data were collected between 2009 and 2016, with up to 5 years of follow-up, and are reported descriptively. RESULTS: Overall, 1281 patients were included in the registry (53.7% female). Mean age was 47.0 years. Of the patients, 793 and 231 completed the 2-year follow-up and 5-year follow-up, respectively. At baseline, 5.4% had changed or given up their job because of CHE, the average duration of CHE was 6.1 years, and, in 22.4%, the CHE was severe according to physician global assessment. Systemic treatment (alitretinoin, acitretin, and methotrexate) was prescribed at least once to 39.0% of the patients during the course of the follow-up. Disease severity, quality of life and treatment satisfaction improved over time, and the proportion of patients receiving systemic treatments decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Under continued dermatological care, substantial improvements in disease severity and PROs over time was achieved during the course of the CARPE registry, even in patients with long-standing and severe hand eczema.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/physiopathology , Hand Dermatoses/physiopathology , Registries , Acitretin/therapeutic use , Administration, Cutaneous , Adolescent , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alitretinoin/therapeutic use , Chronic Disease , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/therapy , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Eczema/physiopathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hand Dermatoses/therapy , Humans , Male , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , PUVA Therapy , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Ultraviolet Therapy , Urea/therapeutic use , Young Adult
3.
Am J Clin Dermatol ; 17(4): 349-58, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27113059

ABSTRACT

Palmoplantar psoriasis and palmoplantar pustulosis are chronic skin diseases with a large impact on patient quality of life. They are frequently refractory to treatment, being generally described as a therapeutic challenge. This article aims to review the definitions of palmoplantar psoriasis and palmoplantar pustulosis, highlighting the similarities and differences in terms of epidemiology, clinical presentation, genetics, histopathology, and pathogenesis, as well as treatment options for both entities. Classical management of mild to moderate palmoplantar pustulosis and palmoplantar psoriasis relies on use of potent topical corticosteroids, phototherapy, and/or acitretin. Nevertheless, these drugs have proven to be insufficient in long-term control of extensive disease. Biologic therapy-namely, anti-interleukin-17 agents and phosphodiesterase type 4 inhibitors-has recently shown promising results in the treatment of palmoplantar psoriasis. Knowledge of the pathophysiologic pathways of both entities is of utmost importance and may, in the future, allow development of molecularly targeted therapeutics.


Subject(s)
Hand Dermatoses/therapy , Psoriasis/therapy , Acitretin/therapeutic use , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Chronic Disease , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Hand Dermatoses/physiopathology , Humans , Phototherapy , Psoriasis/physiopathology , Quality of Life
4.
J Dermatolog Treat ; 27(3): 221-3, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26481287

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Plaque-type palmoplantar psoriasis (PPTP) is a chronic recalcitrant dermatosis with treatment modalities ranging through topical, phototherapy or systemic. Phototherapy options include various forms of ultraviolet B (UVB) and ultraviolet A with prior psoralen sensitization (PUVA). Currently, few comparative studies have been reported. PURPOSE: To compare Broad-Band UVB (BB-UVB) versus paint PUVA (p-PUVA) in regard to efficacy and safety in the treatment of PPTP. METHODS: A retrospective non-randomized cohort study comprised of all the patients with PPTP treated in our phototherapy centre during 2010-2012, either with BB-UVB or p-PUVA. RESULTS: Among the 248 patients included in this study, 122 received BB-UVB and 126 followed p-PUVA treatment. About 36 (30%) and 53 (42%) had complete remission, 29 (24%) and 59 (47%) responded partially and 57 (47%) and 14 (11%) patients did not improve with BB-UVB and p-PUVA, respectively. The odds ratio for remission (p-PUVA: BB-UVB) was 7.9. Duration of remission was 21.9 ± 1.34 months for p-PUVA and 16.75 ± 1.83 months for BB-UVB. CONCLUSION: Both BB-UVB and p-PUVA are good therapeutic options for PPTP. P-PUVA emerges as the superior treatment modality, yielding a better and more extended response. BB-UVB represents a feasible alternative in patients with milder disease or possible contraindications for p-PUVA.


Subject(s)
Foot Dermatoses/therapy , Hand Dermatoses/therapy , PUVA Therapy/methods , Psoriasis/therapy , Ultraviolet Therapy/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Female , Foot Dermatoses/drug therapy , Foot Dermatoses/physiopathology , Foot Dermatoses/radiotherapy , Hand Dermatoses/drug therapy , Hand Dermatoses/physiopathology , Hand Dermatoses/radiotherapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Psoriasis/physiopathology , Psoriasis/radiotherapy , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Ultraviolet Rays
6.
Contact Dermatitis ; 67(4): 234-7, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22624993

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that reactive oxygen species play an important role in the development of both irritant and allergic contact dermatitis. OBJECTIVES: To assess the potential of topical antioxidants to prevent the development of experimentally induced irritant contact dermatitis. METHODS: We evaluated the effect of a cream containing a combination of antioxidants on sodium lauryl sulfate-induced irritant contact dermatitis in the repetitive washing test. As readout parameters for skin barrier function and cutaneous inflammation stratum corneum hydration, cutaneous blood flow and transepidermal water loss were assessed in 25 volunteers with bioengineering methods. RESULTS: In comparison with the cream base and a frequently used barrier cream, the antioxidant cream had high radical scavenging activity and effectively protected the skin from chemical-induced irritation. CONCLUSIONS: The superiority of the cream with antioxidants to the cream base suggests that reactive oxygen species, at least in part, play a role in the development of irritant contact dermatitis.


Subject(s)
Antioxidants/therapeutic use , Dermatitis, Irritant/etiology , Dermatitis, Irritant/prevention & control , Hand Dermatoses/etiology , Hand Dermatoses/prevention & control , Skin Cream/therapeutic use , Dermatitis, Irritant/physiopathology , Double-Blind Method , Hand Dermatoses/physiopathology , Humans , Phytotherapy , Plant Extracts/therapeutic use , Reactive Oxygen Species , Resedaceae , Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate/pharmacology , Tocopherols/therapeutic use , Ubiquinone/therapeutic use
7.
J Dermatol ; 33(2): 132-4, 2006 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16556283

ABSTRACT

Carotenemia is characterized by an abnormal yellowish orange pigmentation of the skin, most prominently seen on the palms and soles. Although it is associated with several disease such as diabetes, hypothyroidism and anorexia nervosa, it is caused by excessive intake of carotene-rich food such as oranges and carrots in most cases. Herein, we describe an interesting case of carotenemia in a 66-year-old female secondary to increased ingestion of oral supplements of carotene in order to improve hemorrhage in the eyeground. There could be an increasing trend of intake of commercial nutrient supplements in which case it is necessary to remind ourselves that commercial nutrient supplements could cause various skin disorders as side-effects.


Subject(s)
Carotenoids/adverse effects , Dietary Supplements/adverse effects , Pigmentation Disorders/etiology , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hand Dermatoses/etiology , Hand Dermatoses/physiopathology , Humans , Pigmentation Disorders/physiopathology , Risk Factors
8.
Int J Dermatol ; 41(9): 602-5, 2002 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12358834

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Primary (idiopathic) hyperhidrosis is a benign disease of unknown etiology, leading to the disruption of professional and social life and emotional problems. A variety of treatment methods have been used to control or reduce the profuse sweating. In this study, we report the efficacy of direct current (d.c.) administration in the treatment of idiopathic hyperhidrosis. METHODS: One hundred and twelve patients with idiopathic hyperhidrosis were enrolled in the study. Initial sweat intensities of the palms were measured by means of the pad glove method. The patients were treated in eight sessions with d.c. administration using a complete regulated d.c. unit based on tap water iontophoresis. The final sweat intensities of responders were determined 20 days after the last treatment. Nonresponders returned earlier than 20 days, with final sweat intensities measured at least 5 days after the last treatment. In 26 responders, plantar hyperhidrosis was also treated. After the first remission period, the second of eight treatments was applied to the palms of 37 responders. RESULTS: This therapy controlled palmar hyperhidrosis in 81.2% of cases. The final sweat intensities of the palms of responders were significantly reduced after eight treatments (P < 0.001). The first average remission period was 35 days. Minimal undesirable effects were noted. CONCLUSIONS: This technique appears to control hyperhidrosis on the palms and soles only if regular treatment is applied. Plantar hyperhidrosis appeared to resolve simultaneously when palmar hyperhidrosis was successfully treated.


Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy/adverse effects , Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Foot Dermatoses/prevention & control , Hand Dermatoses/prevention & control , Hyperhidrosis/prevention & control , Iontophoresis/adverse effects , Iontophoresis/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Female , Foot Dermatoses/physiopathology , Hand Dermatoses/physiopathology , Humans , Hyperhidrosis/physiopathology , Male , Sweat Glands/physiopathology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
9.
Dermatology ; 193(4): 318-20, 1996.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8993956

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the wide practical application of homoeopathy, scientific proof of its effectiveness and mechanisms is still lacking, and sound, placebo-controlled studies are scarce. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of homoeopathy in a prospective, double-blind randomized trial. METHODS: 60 children aged 6-12 years with common warts on the back of the hands were treated either with an individually selected homoeopathic preparation (n = 30) of at least a 1:1,012 dilution or with pure placebo in the form of saccharose globuli (n = 30) under double-blind conditions. The area occupied by warts was measured by computerized planimetry before and after 8 weeks of treatment. Reduction of the warty area by at least 50% was considered a response. RESULTS: There were a total of 16 responders: 9 of 30 patients in the homoeopathic therapy group and 7 of 30 patients in the placebo group (chi 2 = 0.34, p = 0.56). Total cure of warts occurred in 5 patients in the treated group and in 1 patient in the placebo group (chi 2 = 1.46, p = 0.22). CONCLUSION: There was no apparent difference between the effects of homoeopathic therapy and placebo in children with common warts under the conditions of this study.


Subject(s)
Hand Dermatoses/drug therapy , Homeopathy , Warts/drug therapy , Child , Double-Blind Method , Female , Hand Dermatoses/diagnosis , Hand Dermatoses/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Warts/diagnosis , Warts/physiopathology
10.
Contact Dermatitis ; 29(5): 266-71, 1993 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8112068

ABSTRACT

Workers exposed to various irritants are widely advised to use moisturizers. To evaluate the efficacy of a moisturizer (Locobase), we studied 111 cleaners and kitchen workers during everyday exposure to water and detergents. All took part in a standardized interview. After randomization, 1/2 the workers (n = 56) used Locobase during a period of 2 weeks (period L), followed by a period without any emollient (period C), or vice versa (n = 55). Clinical assessment and measurements of the skin surface temperature, electrical capacitance and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) were performed on the fingers, hands and arms on entry to the study, after 2 weeks and 4 weeks, or at drop out. The final evaluation showed that 70 (63%) were able to complete the study; 23 (21%) completed period L, but withdrew from period C after a mean of 6 days because of progressive dryness of the skin and eczema; and 12 (11%) were excluded because they used topical corticosteroids or emollients. The remaining 6 (5%) participants were lost to follow-up. Clinically, we observed a significant increase in dryness (p < 0.001) during periods of no treatment (period C), and normalization of the skin texture during use of Locobase. Clinical observations were confirmed by statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) in the electrical capacitance (epidermal hydration), which decreased during period C and increased to pre-study values during period L. No significant differences were found in skin temperatures and TEWL rates.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Irritant/drug therapy , Dermatitis, Occupational/drug therapy , Detergents/adverse effects , Emollients/therapeutic use , Hand Dermatoses/drug therapy , Occupational Exposure , Water/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Dermatitis, Irritant/immunology , Dermatitis, Irritant/physiopathology , Dermatitis, Occupational/immunology , Dermatitis, Occupational/physiopathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Galvanic Skin Response , Hand Dermatoses/chemically induced , Hand Dermatoses/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Organic Chemicals , Skin Temperature , Time Factors , Water Loss, Insensible
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL