Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 72
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Int J Equity Health ; 22(1): 189, 2023 09 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37697315

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cancer is a significant public health challenge globally, with nearly 2000 lives lost daily in Africa alone. Without adequate measures, mortality rates are likely to increase. The major challenge for cancer care in Africa is equity and prioritization, as cancer is not receiving adequate attention from policy-makers and strategic stakeholders in the healthcare space. This neglect is affecting the three primary tiers of cancer care: prevention, diagnosis, and treatment/management. To promote cancer care equity, addressing issues of equity and prioritization is crucial to ensure that everyone has an equal chance at cancer prevention, early detection, and appropriate care and follow-up treatment. METHODOLOGY: Using available literature, we provide an overview of the current state of cancer care in Africa and recommendations to close the gap. RESULTS: We highlight several factors that contribute to cancer care inequity in Africa, including inadequate funding for cancer research, poor cancer education or awareness, inadequate screening or diagnostic facilities, lack of a well-organized and effective cancer registry system and access to care, shortage of specialized medical staff, high costs for screening, vaccination, and treatment, lack of technical capacity, poor vaccination response, and/or late presentation of patients for cancer screening. We also provide recommendations to address some of these obstacles to achieving cancer care equity. Our recommendations are divided into national-level initiatives and capacity-based initiatives, including cancer health promotion and awareness by healthcare professionals during every hospital visit, encouraging screening and vaccine uptake, ensuring operational regional and national cancer registries, improving healthcare budgeting for staff, equipment, and facilities, building expertise through specialty training, funding for cancer research, providing insurance coverage for cancer care, and implementing mobile health technology for telemedicine diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Addressing challenges to cancer equity holistically would improve the likelihood of longer survival for cancer patients, lower the risk factors for groups that are already at risk, and ensure equitable access to cancer care on the continent. This study identifies the existing stance that African nations have on equity in cancer care, outlines the current constraints, and provides suggestions that could make the biggest difference in attaining equity in cancer care.


Subject(s)
Healthcare Disparities , Neoplasms , Humans , Administrative Personnel , Africa South of the Sahara , Biomedical Technology , Black People , Budgets , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/therapy , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology
2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(5): e2111858, 2021 05 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34047790

ABSTRACT

Importance: The Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model is Medicare's mandatory bundled payment reform to improve quality and spending for beneficiaries who need total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR), yet it does not account for sociodemographic risk factors such as race/ethnicity and income. Results of this study could be the basis for a Medicare payment reform that addresses inequities in joint replacement care. Objective: To examine the association of the CJR model with racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in the use of elective THR and TKR among older Medicare beneficiaries after accounting for the population of patients who were at risk or eligible for these surgical procedures. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used the 2013 to 2017 national Medicare data and multivariable logistic regressions with triple-differences estimation. Medicare beneficiaries who were aged 65 to 99 years, entitled to Medicare, alive at the end of the calendar year, and residing either in the 67 metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) mandated to participate in the CJR model or in the 104 control MSAs were identified. A subset of Medicare beneficiaries with a diagnosis of arthritis underwent THR or TKR. Data were analyzed from March to December 2020. Exposures: Implementation of the CJR model in 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes were separate binary indicators for whether a beneficiary underwent THR or TKR. Key independent variables were MSA treatment status, pre- or post-CJR model implementation phase, combination of race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic beneficiaries) and dual eligibility, and their interactions. Logistic regression models were used to control for patient characteristics, MSA fixed effects, and time trends. Results: The 2013 cohort included 4 447 205 Medicare beneficiaries, of which 2 025 357 (45.5%) resided in MSAs with the CJR model. The cohort's mean (SD) age was 77.18 (7.95) years, and it was composed of 2 951 140 female (66.4%), 3 928 432 non-Hispanic White (88.3%), and 657 073 dually eligible (14.8%) beneficiaries. Before the CJR model implementation, rates were highest among non-Hispanic White non-dual-eligible beneficiaries at 1.25% (95% CI, 1.24%-1.26%) for THR use and 2.28% (95% CI, 2.26%-2.29%) for TKR use in MSAs with CJR model. Compared with MSAs without the CJR model and the analogous race/ethnicity and dual-eligibility group, the CJR model was associated with a 0.10 (95% CI, 0.05-0.15; P < .001) percentage-point increase in TKR use for non-Hispanic White non-dual-eligible beneficiaries, a 0.11 (95% CI, 0.004-0.21; P = .04) percentage-point increase for non-Hispanic White dual-eligible beneficiaries, a 0.15 (95% CI, -0.29 to -0.01; P = .04) percentage-point decrease for non-Hispanic Black non-dual-eligible beneficiaries, and a 0.18 (95% CI, -0.34 to -0.01; P = .03) percentage-point decrease for non-Hispanic Black dual-eligible beneficiaries. These CJR model-associated changes in TKR use were 0.25 (95% CI, -0.40 to -0.10; P = .001) percentage points lower for non-Hispanic Black non-dual-eligible beneficiaries and 0.27 (95% CI, -0.45 to -0.10; P = .002) percentage points lower for non-Hispanic Black dual-eligible beneficiaries compared with the model-associated changes for non-Hispanic White non-dual-eligible beneficiaries. No association was found between the CJR model and a widening of the THR use gap among race/ethnicity and dual eligibility groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study indicate that the CJR model was associated with a modest increase in the already substantial difference in TKR use among non-Hispanic Black vs non-Hispanic White beneficiaries; no difference was found for THR. These findings support the widespread concern that payment reform has the potential to exacerbate disparities in access to joint replacement care.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/economics , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/standards , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/economics , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/standards , Eligibility Determination/standards , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Healthcare Disparities/standards , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/statistics & numerical data , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/statistics & numerical data , Cohort Studies , Elective Surgical Procedures/economics , Elective Surgical Procedures/standards , Elective Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Eligibility Determination/statistics & numerical data , Female , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Medicare/economics , Medicare/standards , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Race Factors , Reimbursement Mechanisms , Socioeconomic Factors , United States
3.
PLoS One ; 16(2): e0246995, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33592017

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Despite skilled attendance during childbirth has been linked with the reduction of maternal deaths, equality in accessing this safe childbirth care is highly needed to achieving universal maternal health coverage. However, little information is available regarding the extent of inequalities in accessing safe childbirth care in Tanzania. This study was performed to assess the current extent, trend, and potential contributors of poor-rich inequalities in accessing safe childbirth care among women in Tanzania. METHODS: This study used data from 2004, 2010, and 2016 Tanzania Demographic Health Surveys. The two maternal health services 1) institutional delivery and 2) skilled birth attendance was used to measures access to safe childbirth care. The inequalities were assessed by using concentration curves and concentration indices. The decomposition analysis was computed to identify the potential contributors to the inequalities in accessing safe childbirth care. RESULTS: A total of 8725, 8176, and 10052 women between 15 and 49 years old from 2004, 2010, and 2016 surveys respectively were included in the study. There is an average gap (>50%) between the poorest and richest in accessing safe childbirth care during the study period. The concentration curves were below the line of inequality which means women from rich households have higher access to the institutional delivery and skilled birth attendance inequalities in accessing institutional delivery and skilled birth attendance. These were also, confirmed with their respective positive concentration indices. The decomposition analysis was able to unveil that household's wealth status, place of residence, and maternal education as the major contributors to the persistent inequalities in accessing safe childbirth care. CONCLUSION: The calls for an integrated policy approach which includes fiscal policies, social protection, labor market, and employment policies need to improve education and wealth status for women from poor households. This might be the first step toward achieving universal maternal health coverage.


Subject(s)
Healthcare Disparities/economics , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Maternal Health Services/economics , Parturition , Universal Health Insurance , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Delivery, Obstetric/economics , Delivery, Obstetric/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Maternal Health , Maternal Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Midwifery/economics , Midwifery/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/economics , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , Tanzania , Young Adult
4.
J Urol ; 205(1): 115-121, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32658588

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Optimal treatment of intermediate risk prostate cancer remains unclear. National Comprehensive Cancer Network® guidelines recommend active surveillance, prostatectomy or radiotherapy. Recent trials demonstrated no difference in prostate cancer specific mortality for men undergoing active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer compared to prostatectomy or radiotherapy. The use of active surveillance for intermediate risk prostate cancer is less clear. In this study we characterize U.S. national trends for demographic, clinical and socioeconomic factors associated with active surveillance for men with intermediate risk prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined 176,122 men diagnosed with intermediate risk prostate cancer from 2010 to 2016 in the National Cancer Database. Temporal trends in demographic, clinical and socioeconomic factors among men with intermediate risk prostate cancer and association with the use of active surveillance were characterized. The analysis was performed in April 2020. RESULTS: In total, 176,122 men were identified with intermediate risk prostate cancer from 2010 to 2016. Of these men 57.3% underwent prostatectomy, 36.4% underwent radiotherapy and 3.2% underwent active surveillance. Active surveillance nearly tripled from 1.6% in 2010 to 4.6% in 2016 (p <0.001). On multivariate analysis use of active surveillance was associated with older age, diagnosis in recent years, lower Gleason score and tumor stage, type of insurance, treatment at an academic center and proximity to facility, and attaining higher education (p <0.05). Race and comorbidities were not associated with active surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight increasing active surveillance use for men with intermediate risk prostate cancer demonstrating clinical and socioeconomic disparities. Prospective data and improved risk stratification are needed to guide optimal treatment for men with intermediate risk prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Health Status Disparities , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Watchful Waiting/statistics & numerical data , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Humans , Insurance Coverage/economics , Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Insurance, Health/economics , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Kallikreins/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Staging , Prostate/pathology , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatectomy/economics , Prostatectomy/statistics & numerical data , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Radiotherapy/economics , Radiotherapy/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Watchful Waiting/economics
5.
Acupunct Med ; 39(5): 533-537, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33280395

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Health inequities or disparities challenge governments and public health systems, impacting health service delivery worldwide. Inherent disadvantage linked to the social determinants of health is intrinsic to the health outcomes among society's marginalised and most vulnerable members. It is acknowledged that marginalised individuals present with higher levels of chronic disease, multi-morbidities and adverse health behaviours than their non-disadvantaged peers. Marginalised individuals and communities present with complex health problems and often receive poor quality or inadequate health care that is unable to meet their needs, leading to stigmatisation and perpetuating the cycle of disadvantage. DISCUSSION: Emerging research indicates that there may be a role for acupuncture in managing the health needs of marginalised populations and that when historical barriers to accessing acupuncture treatment (such as awareness, availability and affordability of this therapy) are removed, certain marginalised populations are open to engaging with acupuncture treatment. Acupuncture has been used by low-income, refugee, veteran and ethnic minority groups to manage chronic pain, substance use disorders, stress and the impacts of trauma in conventional health settings such as community clinics and hospitals. There is the suggestion that integrative health settings and group treatment models may improve access and uptake of acupuncture among marginalised groups. CONCLUSION: Evidence suggests that the sociodemographic profile of acupuncture users is diverse and acupuncture therapy holds potential value in the treatment of marginalised populations. Further research that investigates reframing and expanding the scope of practice for acupuncture is timely and may contribute to tackling health inequity.


Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Acupuncture Therapy/economics , Ethnicity , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Humans , Income , Minority Groups
6.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 39(7): 1253-1262, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32437224

ABSTRACT

As the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic spreads throughout the United States, evidence is mounting that racial and ethnic minorities and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups are bearing a disproportionate burden of illness and death. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of COVID-19 patients at Sutter Health, a large integrated health system in northern California, to measure potential disparities. We used Sutter's integrated electronic health record to identify adults with suspected and confirmed COVID-19, and we used multivariable logistic regression to assess risk of hospitalization, adjusting for known risk factors, such as race/ethnicity, sex, age, health, and socioeconomic variables. We analyzed 1,052 confirmed cases of COVID-19 from the period January 1-April 8, 2020. Among our findings, we observed that compared with non-Hispanic white patients, non-Hispanic African American patients had 2.7 times the odds of hospitalization, after adjustment for age, sex, comorbidities, and income. We explore possible explanations for this, including societal factors that either result in barriers to timely access to care or create circumstances in which patients view delaying care as the most sensible option. Our study provides real-world evidence of racial and ethnic disparities in the presentation of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Poverty/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , COVID-19 , California/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Databases, Factual , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Minority Groups/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Survival Analysis
7.
Int J Health Policy Manag ; 9(3): 91-95, 2020 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32202091

ABSTRACT

Despite progressive universal drug coverage and pharmaceutical policies found in other countries, Canada remains the only developed nation with a publicly funded healthcare system that does not include universal coverage for prescription drugs. In the absence of a national pharmacare plan, a province may choose to cover a specific sub-population for certain drugs. Although different provinces have individually attempted to extend coverage to certain subpopulations within their jurisdictions, out-of-pocket expenses on drugs and pharmaceutical products (OPEDP) accounts for a large proportion of out-of-pocket health expenses (OPHE) that are catastrophic in nature. Pharmaceutical drug coverage is a major source of public scrutiny among politicians and policy-makers in Canada. In this editorial, we focus on social inequalities in the burden of OPEDP in Canada. Prescription drugs are inconsistently covered under patchworks of public insurance coverage, and this inconsistency represents a major source of inequity of healthcare financing. Residents of certain provinces, rural households and Canadians from poorer households are more likely to be affected by this inequity and suffer disproportionately higher proportions of catastrophic out-of-pocket expenses on drugs and pharmaceutical products (COPEDP). Universal pharmacare would reduce COPEDP and promote a more equitable healthcare system in Canada.


Subject(s)
Health Expenditures , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Insurance, Pharmaceutical Services/economics , Prescription Drugs/economics , Canada , Health Equity/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Policy , Humans , National Health Programs , Policy Making
8.
Gynecol Oncol ; 157(1): 46-54, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32008792

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) is a rare histotype of ovarian cancer with a unique disease course. Little data exist regarding the influence of sociodemographic factors on diagnosis and outcomes in this disease. Our objective was to evaluate the associations between these factors and the clinical characteristics, treatment approaches, and survival in LGSC. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for data between 2004 and 2015 on patients with LGSC. LGSC was inclusive of invasive, grade 1, serous carcinoma of the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum. Patient demographics, insurance status, disease characteristics, treatment approach, and survival were evaluated. ANOVA, Chi Square, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression were used in the analysis. RESULTS: 3221 patients with LGSC were evaluated (89.5% White, 6.2% Black; 7.2% Hispanic, 92.8% non-Hispanic). Compared to Whites, Blacks were diagnosed younger (50.4 vs. 55.9 years, p < 0.01), received less chemotherapy (61.8% vs 67.0%, p = 0.04), and had less CA-125 elevation (OR 4.14 [1.26-13.57], p = 0.02). Compared to non-Hispanics, Hispanics were younger (49.5 vs. 55.8 years, p < 0.01) and received less chemotherapy (55% vs 67%, p < 0.001). In contrast to private insurance, government insurance was associated with a higher 30-day mortality (1.5% vs 0.01%, p < 0.001). Race/ethnicity were not predictive of OS, while older age (HR 1.013 [1.002-1.024], p = 0.03), advanced stage (HR 3.09 [2.15-4.43], p < 0.001), and government insurance (HR 2.33 [1.65-3.30], p < 0.001) were all independently associated with worse OS. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences exist in the clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of LGSC by sociodemographics, with Blacks and Hispanics being diagnosed younger and receiving less chemotherapy. Age, stage, and insurance status were predictive of overall survival.


Subject(s)
Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/ethnology , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/therapy , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Ovarian Neoplasms/ethnology , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Black People/statistics & numerical data , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/economics , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/pathology , Female , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Insurance Coverage , Middle Aged , National Health Programs , Ovarian Neoplasms/economics , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Survival Rate , United States/epidemiology , White People/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
9.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique ; 68(2): 91-98, 2020 Apr.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32089349

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: People with chronic disease often have dental (especially periodontal) disorders. Nevertheless, people with chronic disease seek dental care less often than others. We wanted to know if there is a relationship between the consumption of medical care and the consumption of dental care, and if so if the relationship is especially strong for people with chronic disease. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal study that combined two data-sets: consumption data from the French National Health Insurance Fund and health and socioeconomic welfare data collected with a dedicated national survey. We studied healthcare expenditure and analyzed the association between healthcare consumption, health status and healthcare expenditure over a four-year period (2010-2013). RESULTS: People who did not seek medical or dental care in 2010 exhibited irregular consumer behavior thereafter. This pattern was particularly evident among those with chronic disease whose healthcare expenditures did not stabilize during the study period compared with the rest of the study population. Among people who did not seek medical care in 2010, variation in average dental care expenditure was 91% in people with chronic disease versus 42% for those without chronic disease. Lack of medical care during the first year of the study was also associated with greater expenditure-delay in people with chronic disease (77%) compared with 15% in people without chronic disease. CONCLUSION: The lack of medical or dental care in 2010 for people with chronic disease did not lead to an increase in medical and dental consumption in the following years. The catch-up delay was longer than four years. This highlights a problem of monitoring and identifies a marginalized population within the healthcare system.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease , Dental Care/economics , Health Expenditures , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Adult , Aged , Chronic Disease/economics , Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Chronic Disease/therapy , Datasets as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Dental Care/standards , Dental Care/statistics & numerical data , Female , France/epidemiology , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/standards , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Health Status , Health Status Disparities , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Diseases/economics , Mouth Diseases/epidemiology , National Health Programs/economics , National Health Programs/statistics & numerical data , Oral Health/economics , Oral Health/standards , Oral Health/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
11.
Value Health ; 23(1): 39-42, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31952672

ABSTRACT

India is a diverse land with different cultures, social norms, castes, religions, faiths, languages, politics, and a complex healthcare system. As a step to enhance healthcare, the government of India announced a move toward universal health coverage to increase accessibility and affordability of health-related services. Recently, there has been an introduction of health technology assessment (HTA) in India to help inform evidence-based decision making in cases of limited resources and budgets. Nevertheless, there are challenges related to biased decision making, an unregulated healthcare framework, and the lack of data and capacity that will (directly or indirectly) affect the use of HTA in India. For HTA to be successful in India and in similar low- and middle-income countries, it is important that the decision makers acknowledge these challenges and embrace differences in ideologies, cultures, and politics instead of ignoring them. Drawing lessons from countries with well-developed HTA bodies may help, but these need to be modified for the country-specific context. Ensuring quality and transparency is key to building trust in medical decision making. Improved coordination at all levels of healthcare is vital to ensure the long-term success of HTA in India. This is challenging but achievable by spreading awareness among stakeholders and achieving moderate health-sector regulation that can combat corruption. HTA will prosper in India if it incorporates cultural and institutional diversity, alongside tackling socioeconomic inequalities.


Subject(s)
Choice Behavior , Health Care Rationing , Health Policy , Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Universal Health Care , Universal Health Insurance , Clinical Decision-Making , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Culturally Appropriate Technology , Culturally Competent Care , Health Care Costs , Health Care Rationing/economics , Health Care Rationing/organization & administration , Health Policy/economics , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Healthcare Disparities/organization & administration , Humans , India , Policy Making , Quality of Life , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Social Values , Stakeholder Participation , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/economics , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/organization & administration , Universal Health Insurance/economics , Universal Health Insurance/organization & administration
12.
Transplantation ; 104(4): 795-803, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31403554

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The number of patients waiting to receive a kidney transplant outstrips the supply of donor organs. We sought to quantify trade-offs associated with different approaches to deceased donor kidney allocation in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs, and access to transplantation. METHODS: An individual patient simulation model was developed to compare 5 different approaches to kidney allocation, including the 2006 UK National Kidney Allocation Scheme (NKAS) and a QALY maximization approach designed to maximize health gains from a limited supply of donor organs. We used various sources of patient-level data to develop multivariable regression models to predict survival, health state utilities, and costs. We simulated the allocation of kidneys from 2200 deceased donors to a waiting list of 5500 patients and produced estimates of total lifetime costs and QALYs for each allocation scheme. RESULTS: Among patients who received a transplant, the QALY maximization approach generated 48 045 QALYs and cost £681 million, while the 2006 NKAS generated 44 040 QALYs and cost £625 million. When also taking into consideration outcomes for patients who were not prioritized to receive a transplant, the 2006 NKAS produced higher total QALYs and costs and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £110 741/QALY compared with the QALY maximization approach. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the 2006 NKAS, a QALY maximization approach makes more efficient use of deceased donor kidneys but reduces access to transplantation for older patients and results in greater inequity in the distribution of health gains between patients who receive a transplant and patients who remain on the waiting list.


Subject(s)
Computer Simulation , Donor Selection , Health Care Rationing , Health Services Accessibility , Healthcare Disparities , Kidney Transplantation , Tissue Donors/supply & distribution , Waiting Lists , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Donor Selection/economics , Female , Health Care Costs , Health Care Rationing/economics , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Health Status , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Kidney Transplantation/economics , Kidney Transplantation/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Policy Making , Quality of Life , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States , Waiting Lists/mortality , Young Adult
13.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 19(1): 987, 2019 Dec 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31870361

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Social disparities in healthcare persist in the US despite the expansion of Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. We investigated the causal impact of socioeconomic status on the quality of care in a setting with minimal confounding bias from race, insurance type, and access to care. METHODS: We designed a retrospective population-based study with a random 25% sample of adult Taiwan population enrolled in Taiwan's National Health Insurance system from 2000 to 2016. Patient's income levels were categorized into low-income group (<25th percentile) and high-income group (≥25th percentile). We used marginal structural modeling analysis to calculate the odds of hospital admissions for 11 ambulatory care sensitive conditions identified by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the odds of having an Elixhauser comorbidity index greater than zero for low-income patients. RESULTS: Among 2,844,334 patients, those in lower-income group had 1.28 greater odds (95% CI 1.24-1.33) of experiencing preventable hospitalizations, and 1.04 greater odds (95% CI 1.03-1.05) of having a comorbid condition in comparison to high-income group. CONCLUSIONS: Income was shown to be a causal factor in a patient's health and a determinant of the quality of care received even with equitable access to care under a universal health insurance system. Policies focusing on addressing income as an important upstream causal determinant of health to provide support to patients in lower socioeconomic status will be effective in improving health outcomes for this vulnerable social stratum.


Subject(s)
Healthcare Disparities/economics , Income/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Social Class , Universal Health Insurance , Adult , Ambulatory Care , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , National Health Programs , Retrospective Studies , Taiwan/epidemiology
14.
Int J Equity Health ; 18(1): 201, 2019 12 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31870447

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the pro-poor health policies in Ethiopia, the utilization of maternal, neonatal, and child health services remains a challenge for the country. Health equity became central in the post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals globally and is a priority for Ethiopia. The aim of this study was to assess equity in utilization of a range of maternal and child health services by applying absolute and relative equity indices. METHODS: Data on maternal and child health utilization emanated from a baseline survey conducted for a large project 'Optimizing the Health Extension Program from December 2016 to February 2017 in four regions of Ethiopia. The utilization of four or more antenatal care visits; skilled birth attendance; postnatal care within 2 days after childbirth; immunization with BCG, polio 3, pentavalent 3, measles and full immunization of children aged 12-23 months; and vitamin A supplementation for 6-23 months old children were stratified by wealth quintiles. The socioeconomic status of the household was assessed by household assets and measured by constructing a wealth index using principal component analysis. Equity was assessed by applying two absolute inequity indices (Wealth index [quintile 5- quintile 1] and slope index of inequality) and two relative inequity indices (Wealth index [quintile5: quintile1] and concentration index). RESULTS: The maternal health services utilization was low and inequitably distributed favoring the better-off women. About 44, 71, and 18% of women from the better-off households had four or more antenatal visits, utilized skilled birth attendance and postnatal care within two days compared to 20, 29, and 8% of women from the poorest households, respectively. Skilled birth attendance was the most inequitably distributed maternal health service. All basic immunizations: BCG, polio 3, pentavalent 3, measles, and full immunization in children aged 12-23 months and vitamin A supplementation were equitably distributed. CONCLUSION: Utilization of maternal health services was low, inequitable, and skewed against women from the poorest households. In contrast, preventive child health services were equitably distributed. Efforts to increase utilization and reinforcement of pro-poor and pro-rural strategies for maternal, newborn and immunization services in Ethiopia should be strengthened.


Subject(s)
Child Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Facilities and Services Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Maternal Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ethiopia , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Socioeconomic Factors , Young Adult
15.
BMC Res Notes ; 12(1): 490, 2019 Aug 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31391102

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of socioeconomic household characteristics on access to paediatric malaria treatment in Homa Bay County, Kenya. RESULTS: From univariate analysis, treatment with analgesics only in a community health center or a faith-based organization, self-employment, urban residence and residing in a sub-county other than Suba or Mbita showed significant association with access to paediatric antimalarial treatment. However, on multivariate analysis, urban residence, education, income of 10,000 to 30,000 and information from peers were the most statistically significant predictors of access to treatment. Urban households were 0.37 times more likely to access treatment than rural ones. Having primary, secondary or post-secondary education conferred 0.25, 0.14 and 0.28 higher chance of access to paediatric malaria treatment respectively compared to those with no formal education. Those with monthly income levels of 10,000 to 30,000 shillings had 0.32 higher chance of accessing treatment compared to those with less than 5000 shillings.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/economics , Antimalarials/economics , Artemisinins/economics , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Malaria/economics , Adult , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Artemisinins/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Community Health Centers , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Combinations , Family Characteristics , Female , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Kenya , Malaria/drug therapy , Malaria/physiopathology , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Rural Population , Socioeconomic Factors , Urban Population
16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31167441

ABSTRACT

Background: Health disparities related to environmental exposure exist in different industries. Cancer is currently a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Much remains unknown about the types of work and industries that face the greatest cancer risks. In this study, we aimed to provide the overall and specific cancer incidences among all workers from 2004 to 2015. We also aimed to show the all-cause mortality for all employees with a first-ever cancer diagnosis. Methods: All workers in Taiwan in the labor insurance database in 2004-2015 were linked to the national health insurance databases. The annual overall and specific cancer incidences in 2004-2015 were calculated and stratified by industry and gender. Age-standardized incidence rates were also calculated. Results: A total of 332,575 workers (46.5% male) who had a first-ever cancer diagnosis from 2004-2015 were identified from 16,720,631 employees who provided 1,564,593 person-years of observation. The fishing, wholesale, construction, and building industries were identified as high-risk industries, with at least 5% of employees within them receiving a first-ever cancer diagnosis. Temporal trends of cancer incidences showed a range from 235.5 to 294.4 per 100,000 with an overall upward trend and an increase of 1.3-fold from 2004 to 2015. There were significant increases over that time for breast cancer (25%); colon cancer (8%); lung, bronchial, and tracheal cancers (11%); and oral cancer (1.7%). However, the incidence rates of cervical cancer and liver and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma decreased by 11.2% and 8.3%, respectively. Among the 332,575 workers with a first-ever cancer diagnosis, there were 110,692 deaths and a mortality rate of 70.75 per 1000 person-years. Conclusions: The overall incidence of cancer increased over the 10-year study period, probably due to the aging of the working population. High-risk industries are concentrated in the labor-intensive blue-collar class, which is related to aging and socioeconomic status intergradation.


Subject(s)
Healthcare Disparities/economics , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Databases, Factual , Environmental Exposure , Female , Humans , Incidence , Industry , Male , Middle Aged , Morbidity , National Health Programs , Neoplasms/economics , Registries , Social Class , Taiwan/epidemiology
17.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 28(8): 2292-2301, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31200963

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although endovascular thrombectomy combined with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator is effective for treatment of acute ischemic stroke, regional disparities in implementation rates of those treatments have been reported. Drive and retrieve system, where a qualified neurointerventionist travels to another primary stroke center for endovascular thrombectomy, has been practiced in parts of Hokkaido, Japan. This study aims to simulate the cost effectiveness of the drive and retrieve system, which can be a method to enhance equality and cost effectiveness of treatments for acute ischemic stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The number of patients who had acute ischemic stroke in 2015 is estimated. Those patients are generated according to the population distribution, and thereafter patient transport time is analyzed in the 3 scenarios (1) 60-minute drive scenario, (2) 90-minute drive scenario, in which the drive and retrieve system operates within 60-minute or 90-minute driving distance (3) without the system, using geographic information system. Incremental cost-effectiveness rate, quality-adjusted life years, and medical and nursing care costs are estimated from the analyzed transport time. FINDINGS: The incremental cost-effectiveness rate by implementing the system was dominant. Cost reductions of $213,190 in 60-minute drive scenario, and $247,274 in the 90-minute scenario were expected, respectively. Such benefits are the most significant in Soya, Emmon, Rumoi, and Kamikawahokubu medical areas. CONCLUSIONS: The drive and retrieve system could enhance regional equality and cost effectiveness of ischemic stroke treatments in Hokkaido, which can be achieved using existing resources. Further studies are required to clarify its cost effectiveness from hospital perspective.


Subject(s)
Automobile Driving , Brain Ischemia/therapy , Endovascular Procedures/economics , Geographic Information Systems/economics , Health Care Costs , Neurologists/economics , Regional Health Planning/economics , Stroke/therapy , Thrombectomy/economics , Brain Ischemia/diagnosis , Brain Ischemia/epidemiology , Cost Savings , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/economics , Geographic Information Systems/organization & administration , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Neurologists/organization & administration , Quality of Life , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Regional Health Planning/organization & administration , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/epidemiology , Time Factors , Time-to-Treatment/economics , Treatment Outcome
18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30936689

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Efficient management of COPD represents an international challenge. Effective management strategies within the means of limited health care budgets are urgently required. This analysis aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a home-based disease management (DM) intervention vs usual management (UM) in patients from the COPD Patient Management European Trial (COMET). Methods: Cost-effectiveness was evaluated in 319 intention-to-treat patients over 12 months in COMET. The analysis captured unplanned all-cause hospitalization days, mortality, and quality-adjusted life expectancy. Costs were evaluated from a National Health Service perspective for France, Germany, and Spain, and in a pooled analysis, and were expressed in 2015 Euros (EUR). Quality of life was assessed using the 15D health-related quality-of-life instrument and mapped to utility scores. Results: Home-based DM was associated with improved mortality and quality-adjusted life expectancy. DM and UM were associated with equivalent direct costs (DM reduced costs by EUR -37 per patient per year) in the pooled analysis. DM was associated with lower costs in France (EUR -806 per patient per year) and Spain (EUR -51 per patient per year), but higher costs in Germany (EUR 391 per patient per year). Evaluation of cost per death avoided and cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained showed that DM was dominant (more QALYs and cost saving) in France and Spain, and cost-effective in Germany vs UM. Nonparametric bootstrapping analysis, assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of EUR 20,000 per QALY gained, indicated that the probability of home-based DM being cost-effective vs UM was 87.7% in France, 81.5% in Spain, and 75.9% in Germany. Conclusion: Home-based DM improved clinical outcomes at equivalent cost vs UM in France and Spain, and in the pooled analysis. DM was cost-effective in Germany with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of EUR 2,541 per QALY gained. The COMET home-based DM intervention could represent an attractive alternative to UM for European health care payers.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Home Care Services/economics , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/economics , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Cost Savings , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Europe , Health Status , Humans , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/mortality , Quality of Life , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
19.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 16(4 Pt B): 601-606, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30947894

ABSTRACT

Lung cancer screening is just starting to be implemented across the United States. Challenges to screening include access to care, awareness of the option for screening, stigma and implicit bias that are due to stigmatization of smoking, stigma of race, nihilism with lung cancer diagnosis viewed as a "death sentence," shared decision making, and underestimation of lung cancer risk. African Americans (AA) have the highest lung cancer mortality rate in the United States despite similar smoking rates as whites. AAs are diagnosed at a later stage, and there is a greater likelihood they will refuse treatment options when diagnosed. Additionally, fewer AAs were found to meet lung cancer screening eligibility criteria compared with whites because of lower tobacco exposure and younger age at time of diagnosis. Outreach and access for lung cancer screening in the AA community and other subpopulations at risk are critical to avoid further increasing disparities in lung cancer morbidity and mortality as lung cancer screening is implemented across the United States. The path forward requires implementing outreach programs and providing lung cancer screening in underserved communities at high risk for lung cancer; consideration of using National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for screening selection criteria, including risk model screening selection; and developing interventions to address stigma, clinician implicit bias, and nihilism.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Health Status Disparities , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Female , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Needs Assessment , Risk Assessment , Socioeconomic Factors , Survival Analysis , United States , White People/statistics & numerical data
20.
Anesth Analg ; 129(1): 294-300, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30855341

ABSTRACT

Inadequate access to anesthesia and surgical services is often considered to be a problem of low- and middle-income countries. However, affluent nations, including Canada, Australia, and the United States, also face shortages of anesthesia and surgical care in rural and remote communities. Inadequate services often disproportionately affect indigenous populations. A lack of anesthesia care providers has been identified as a major contributing factor to the shortfall of surgical and obstetrical care in rural and remote areas of these countries. This report summarizes the challenges facing the provision of anesthesia services in rural and remote regions. The current landscape of anesthesia providers and their training is described. We also explore innovative strategies and emerging technologies that could better support physician-led anesthesia care teams working in rural and remote areas. Ultimately, we believe that it is the responsibility of specialist anesthesiologists and academic health sciences centers to facilitate access to high-quality care through partnership with other stakeholders. Professional medical organizations also play an important role in ensuring the quality of care and continuing professional development. Enhanced collaboration between academic anesthesiologists and other stakeholders is required to meet the challenge issued by the World Health Organization to ensure access to essential anesthesia and surgical services for all.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Developed Countries , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Healthcare Disparities/organization & administration , Patient Safety , Rural Health Services/organization & administration , Anesthesia/adverse effects , Anesthesia/economics , Anesthesiologists/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/economics , Developed Countries/economics , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Humans , Leadership , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Patient Safety/economics , Physician's Role , Risk Factors , Rural Health Services/economics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL