Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Glob Health ; 10(2): 020103, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33110502

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has put health systems, economies and societies under unprecedented strain, calling for innovative approaches. Scotland's government, like those elsewhere, is facing difficult decisions about how to deploy digital technologies and data to help contain, control and manage the disease, while also respecting citizens' rights. This paper explores the ethical challenges presented by these methods, with particular emphasis on mobile apps associated with contact tracing. Drawing on UK and international experiences, it examines issues such as public trust, data privacy and technology design; how changing disease threats and contextual factors can affect the balance between public benefits and risks; and the importance of transparency, accountability and stakeholder participation for the trustworthiness and good-governance of digital systems and strategies. Analysis of recent technology debates, controversial programmes and emerging outcomes in comparable countries implementing contact tracing apps, reveals sociotechnical complexities and unexpected paradoxes that warrant further study and underlines the need for holistic, inclusive and adaptive strategies. The paper also considers the potential role of these apps as Scotland transitions to the 'new normal', outlines challenges and opportunities for public engagement, and poses a set of ethical questions to inform decision-making at multiple levels, from software design to institutional governance.


Subject(s)
Contact Tracing/ethics , Disease Transmission, Infectious/ethics , Human Rights/ethics , Mobile Applications/ethics , Pandemics/ethics , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Contact Tracing/methods , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Government , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Scotland/epidemiology , Stakeholder Participation , Technology/ethics
2.
Midwifery ; 18(3): 188-92, 2002 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12381422

ABSTRACT

Midwives as predominantly women caring for other women are subject to the same human rights violations and abuse that affect all the women of the world. They need to know and recognise these human rights violations before being able to take action that will reduce or eliminate such harmful practices. In this article, I address gender-based violations of the basic human rights of particular concern to women during their childbearing years, such as personal safety, respect for human dignity, fair and equitable access to health services, along with autonomous decision-making based on complete and unbiased information. The ethical and legal foundations of human rights are discussed in relation to viewing women as fully human, fully persons. Guidance for midwives taken from key documents of the International Confederation of Midwives are offered as midwives work together with women to end gender-based violations of one's human rights.


Subject(s)
Domestic Violence/prevention & control , Human Rights , Midwifery/ethics , Nurse's Role , Women's Health , Decision Making , Female , Health Services Accessibility , Human Rights/ethics , Humans , International Cooperation , International Council of Nurses , Midwifery/standards , Personal Autonomy , Practice Guidelines as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL