Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 442
Filter
Add more filters

Complementary Medicines
Publication year range
1.
Int Ophthalmol ; 44(1): 184, 2024 Apr 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38630143

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To analyze the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of adjuvant therapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) compared to interferon α-2b (IFNα-2b) after surgery in ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN). METHODS: Retrospective study that included patients diagnosed with OSSN, who underwent surgical excision followed by adjuvant therapy with IFN α-2b (Group A) or 5-FU (Group B), in a tertial referral hospital. Clinical data collected included: demographics, risk factors, appearance, size and location of the lesions, slit-lamp examination, anterior segment optical coherence tomography, iconography and histological classification of subtypes of OSSN. Costs derived from surgery and adjuvant therapy were noted. Resolution of the lesion, recurrences and adverse events were studied. Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed with the incremental cost-effectiveness index (CEI). RESULTS: 54 cases of 54 patients were included, with a mean age of 74.4 years (range 28-109). 30 were male (55.6%), and predominantly Caucasian (79.6%). The main risk factor was prolonged sun exposure (79.6%). Leukoplakic appearance (48.1%), location in bulbar conjunctiva (48.2%) and T3 (46.3%) stage were the most common clinical features. Histologically, the percentage of CIN I, CIN II, CIN III and SCC were 25.9%, 29.6%, 40.7% and 3.7%, respectively. Complete resolution was obtained in 74.1% and tolerance was overall positive. The cost was significantly higher for IFNα (1025€ ± 130.68€) compared to 5-FU (165.57€ ± 45.85 €) (p 0.001). The CEI was - 247.14€. CONCLUSIONS: Both 5-FU and IFN α-2b are effective and present a good security profile as adjuvant therapies after surgery in OSSN. Although presenting slightly more ocular complications, 5-FU can be considered more cost-effective than IFN α-2b.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Conjunctival Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Tertiary Care Centers , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Interferon-alpha/therapeutic use , Interferon alpha-2/therapeutic use , Conjunctiva , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery
2.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 315(8): 2365-2373, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37179261

ABSTRACT

Verruca vulgaris is always stubborn to treat. We applied a new combined therapy of local recombinant human interferon alpha 1b (rhIFNα1b) injection plus acupuncture on verruca vulgaris recently to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combined therapy. The retrospective study was conducted in The First Hospital of China Medical University from 2018 to 2020. Patients with verruca vulgaris were included. Combined therapy with local rhIFNα1b injection plus acupuncture was set as treatment group, rhIFNα1b injection and carbon dioxide (CO2) laser were set as control groups. A total of 2415 patients were included in the study. The cure rates were 81.85%, 85.93%, and 100% in combined group, rhIFNα1b group, and CO2 laser group, separately. All lesions cured in combined group were located on hands or feet, while majority of lesions cured in other groups were located on other sites. For patients with medium/big single lesion or 6-9 lesions, less treatment times were needed in combined group than rhIFNα1b group. For patients with small single, two to five or more than ten lesions, the treatment times of combined group and rhIFNα1b group were comparable. All patients complained of pain in varying degrees when local injection or laser irradiation. Compared with CO2 laser group, more fever, less swelling or scar was reported in combined group. In conclusion, combined therapy of local rhIFNα1b plus acupuncture was beneficial for verruca vulgaris with limited adverse effects. The therapy was more acceptable by younger female patients with verruca vulgaris.


Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy , Warts , Humans , Female , Retrospective Studies , Carbon Dioxide , Warts/therapy , Interferon-alpha/therapeutic use
3.
Dermatol Ther ; 35(10): e15737, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35903895

ABSTRACT

Patients with early stage cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL) usually have a benign and chronic disease course, characterized by temporally response to conventional skin directed therapies and intrinsic possibility to evolve. Using the combination of psoralen plus ultraviolet A irradiation (PUVA) and low-dose interferon-α (INF), the principal treatment goal is to keep confined the disease to the skin, preventing disease progression. Among 87 patients with early stage IA to IIA MF treated with low-dose IFN-α2b and PUVA in our center, complete remission (CR) were reported in 70 patients (80.5%) and the overall response rate (ORR) was 97.8% (n = 85), with a median time to best response to therapy of 5 months (range, 1-30). Among the responders, only the 8% of patients had a relapse with major event. The median follow-up was 207 months (range, 6-295). Survival data showed a median overall survival (OS) not reached (95% CI; 235-NR months), a disease free survival (DFS) of 210 months (95% CI; 200-226 months) and a median time to next treatment (TTNT) of 38.5 months (95% CI, 33-46 months). The long follow up of this study verifies our preliminary results already published in 2006 and confirms the efficacy of INF-PUVA combination therapy in a real world setting, according conventional (OS and DFS) and emerging (TTNT) clinical endpoint of treatment efficacy.


Subject(s)
Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous , Mycosis Fungoides , Skin Neoplasms , Ficusin/therapeutic use , Humans , Interferon-alpha/therapeutic use , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous/pathology , Mycosis Fungoides/drug therapy , Mycosis Fungoides/pathology , Mycosis Fungoides/radiotherapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , PUVA Therapy/methods , Prognosis , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Treatment Outcome
4.
Can J Physiol Pharmacol ; 100(5): 453-463, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34932399

ABSTRACT

The complexity of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) signaling and the failure of pharmacological therapeutics reveal the significance of establishing new anti-cancer strategies. Interferon alpha (IFN-α) has been used as adjuvant therapy for reducing HCC recurrence and improving survival. Delta-tocotrienol (δ-tocotrienol), a natural unsaturated isoform of vitamin E, is a promising candidate for cancer treatment. In this study, we evaluated whether the combination of δ-tocotrienol with IFN-α displays significant advantages in the treatment of HCC cells. Results showed that the combination significantly decreased cell viability, migration and invasion of HCC cells compared with single therapies. Combining δ-tocotrienol and IFN-α enhanced the decrease in proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) 7 and MMP-9. The combination also produced an enhancement of apoptosis together with increased Bax/Bcl-xL ratio and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation. δ-tocotrienol induced Notch1 activation and changes in Erk and p38 MAPK signaling status. Blocking experiments confirmed that ROS and Erk are involved, at least in part, in the anti-cancer effects of the combined treatment. In conclusion, the combination of δ-tocotrienol with IFN-α therapy showed promising results for HCC cell treatment, which makes the combination of cytokine-based immunotherapy with natural products a potential strategy against liver cancer.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Liver Neoplasms , Apoptosis , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology , Cell Line, Tumor , Humans , Interferon-alpha/pharmacology , Interferon-alpha/therapeutic use , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Reactive Oxygen Species/metabolism , Signal Transduction , Vitamin E/analogs & derivatives , Vitamin E/pharmacology , Vitamin E/therapeutic use
5.
Blood ; 138(22): 2231-2243, 2021 12 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34407546

ABSTRACT

Classical BCR-ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal disorders of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) caused mainly by recurrent mutations in genes encoding JAK2 (JAK2), calreticulin (CALR), or the thrombopoietin receptor (MPL). Interferon α (IFNα) has demonstrated some efficacy in inducing molecular remission in MPNs. To determine factors that influence molecular response rate, we evaluated the long-term molecular efficacy of IFNα in patients with MPN by monitoring the fate of cells carrying driver mutations in a prospective observational and longitudinal study of 48 patients over more than 5 years. We measured the clonal architecture of early and late hematopoietic progenitors (84 845 measurements) and the global variant allele frequency in mature cells (409 measurements) several times per year. Using mathematical modeling and hierarchical Bayesian inference, we further inferred the dynamics of IFNα-targeted mutated HSCs. Our data support the hypothesis that IFNα targets JAK2V617F HSCs by inducing their exit from quiescence and differentiation into progenitors. Our observations indicate that treatment efficacy is higher in homozygous than heterozygous JAK2V617F HSCs and increases with high IFNα dose in heterozygous JAK2V617F HSCs. We also found that the molecular responses of CALRm HSCs to IFNα were heterogeneous, varying between type 1 and type 2 CALRm, and a high dose of IFNα correlates with worse outcomes. Our work indicates that the long-term molecular efficacy of IFNα implies an HSC exhaustion mechanism and depends on both the driver mutation type and IFNα dose.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cells/drug effects , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Interferon-alpha/therapeutic use , Mutation/drug effects , Myeloproliferative Disorders/drug therapy , Calreticulin/genetics , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/metabolism , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/pathology , Humans , Immunologic Factors/pharmacology , Interferon-alpha/pharmacology , Janus Kinase 2/genetics , Longitudinal Studies , Myeloproliferative Disorders/genetics , Myeloproliferative Disorders/pathology , Prospective Studies , Receptors, Thrombopoietin/genetics , Tumor Cells, Cultured
6.
Br J Haematol ; 195(3): 352-364, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33987825

ABSTRACT

T-cell lymphomas (TCLs) constitute a rare subset of non-Hodgkin lymphomas, with mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome (MF/SS) being the most common subtype of cutaneous TCLs (CTCLs). Considered an incurable but treatable disease, MF/SS management presents several challenges including diagnostic delays, debilitating effect on patients' quality of life, need for several lines of therapies, multidisciplinary care and cumulative drug toxicities limiting duration of use. The present review intends to provide an overview of the recent advances in our understanding of the biology of CTCL and how these are being leveraged to provide additional treatment options for management of advanced and recurrent disease. In addition, the discussion of the different modalities of treatment is summarised to further outline the importance of multidisciplinary care and early referral to CTCL centres.


Subject(s)
Mycosis Fungoides/therapy , Sezary Syndrome/therapy , Skin Neoplasms/therapy , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Bexarotene/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Clinical Trials as Topic , Combined Modality Therapy , Delayed Diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Electrons/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Humans , Interferon-alpha/therapeutic use , Male , Mycosis Fungoides/diagnosis , Mycosis Fungoides/pathology , Mycosis Fungoides/physiopathology , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplastic Stem Cells/chemistry , Neoplastic Stem Cells/pathology , PUVA Therapy , Photopheresis , Prognosis , Retinoids/therapeutic use , Sezary Syndrome/diagnosis , Sezary Syndrome/pathology , Sezary Syndrome/physiopathology , Signal Transduction , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/physiopathology , T-Lymphocyte Subsets/chemistry , T-Lymphocyte Subsets/pathology
7.
Lima; INEN; 11 mayo 2021.
Non-conventional in Spanish | BRISA | ID: biblio-1282187

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCIÓN: El servicio de medicina oncológica del Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas solicita la evaluación de tecnología sanitaria: Interferon alfa (IFNα). 2. El tratamiento de elección de melanoma cutáneo estadío II de alto riesgo y III es la cirugía, sin embargo, un porcentaje importante de pacientes presenta recurrencia de enfermedad durante su evolución. Diversos ensayos clínicos prospectivos determinaron que el tratamiento complementario con interferón alfa se estableció como terapia adyuvante en los pacientes con diagnóstico de melanoma estadío IIB y III operados, mejorando la sobrevida libre de progresión. El seguimiento mayor de 10 años de los estudios pivotales, confirman el beneficio en sobrevida libre de progresión, sin embargo, no encuentran un beneficio claro en sobrevida global. ESTRATEGIA DE BÚSQUEDA DE INFORMACIÓN: a) Pregunta Clínica: En los pacientes con melanoma cutáneo estadío II y III operados del INEN, ¿Existe algún beneficio con la aplicación de IFNα como tratamiento adyuvante? Recolecciòn de los Manuscritos a Revisar: Tipos de estudios: La estrategia de búsqueda sistemática de información científica para el desarrollo del presente informe se realizó siguiendo las recomendaciones de la Pirámide jerárquica de la evidencia propuesta por Haynes y se consideró los siguientes estudios: Sumarios y guías de práctica clínica. Revisiones sistemáticas y/o meta-análisis. Ensayos Controlados Aleatorizados (ECA). Estudios Observacionales (cohortes, caso y control, descriptivos). Términos de Búsqueda: Considerando la pregunta PICO se construyó una estrategia de búsqueda. Sin restricciones en el idioma ni en periodo de publicación. DISCUSIÓN: La incidencia de pacientes con diagnóstico de melanoma cutáneo ha aumentado en las últimas décadas. Si bien el tratamiento de elección en los estadíos II y III es la cirugía, la cantidad de pacientes que presenta recurrencia de enfermedad es considerable. El tratamiento complementario con interferón alfa se estableció como terapia adyuvante en esta población de pacientes y ha sido utilizado desde hace décadas. Si bien los estudios pivotales encontraron un beneficio claro en la sobrevida libre de progresión de enfermedad, no se alcanzó beneficio significativo en sobrevida global, siendo este el objetivo verdadero de todo estudio que evalúa un fármaco en adyuvancia. Algo a remarcar es la toxicidad del interferón; en los estudios pivotales casi la mitad de los pacientes presentaron eventos adversos grado III-IV, especialmente granulocitopenia, hepatotoxicidad y fatiga. El seguimiento a más de 10 años de los estudios pivotales confirmaron la mejora del tiempo libre de progresión, sin embargo, solamente uno de los estudios presentó beneficio estadísticamente significativo en sobrevida global. Los subsecuentes metaanálisis y revisiones sistemáticas encontraron beneficio estadístico en sobrevida libre de progresión y si bien la mejora en este escenario es innegable, el beneficio en sobrevida global es modesto. Si bien los metaanálisis reportados por Mocellin demostraron que la adyuvancia con interferón disminuyó la mortalidad en el melanoma cutáneo operado, los HR encontrados fueron 0.89 (0.83-0.96) y 0.91(0.85-0.97). Los reportes mencionados tampoco determinan si alguna característica clínico-patológica se encuentra más beneficiada con el interferón. La revisión sistemática realizada por Peter Mohr, no encontró beneficio en sobrevida global con el uso de interferón adyuvante. En los últimos años, el melanoma ha sido reconocido como una enfermedad inmunogénica y múltiples ensayos han demostrado que agentes como pembrolizumab, nivolumab o ipilimumab funcionan como tratamiento en primera línea de terapia, así como en adyuvancia. Se discutió los resultados obtenidos en la reunión de la unidad de tecnología sanitaria y el departamento de medicina oncológica, indicándose que el beneficio del interferón alfa en tiempo libre de progresión es claro, sin embargo, el beneficio en sobrevida es incierto. Además, la evidencia revisada señala también que un buen porcentaje de pacientes presenta toxicidad. En vista a lo expuesto se sugiere que el tratamiento con interferón alfa se indique como opción de tratamiento adyuvante en pacientes con melanoma operado estadio IIC ulcerado, donde el uso de inmunoterapia aún no está indicado o en pacientes que no tengan acceso a inmunoterapia. CONCLUSIONES: 1) La aplicación de IFNα adyuvante en melanoma maligno cutáneo operado estadio II y III mejora el tiempo libre de progresión de forma estadísticamente significativa en múltiples ensayos clínicos prospectivos y metaanálisis. 2) En la literatura revisada, el beneficio de la aplicación de IFNα tiene resultados discordantes en sobrevida global, por lo cual no se puede definir un beneficio claro en sobrevida. 3) El uso de IFNα adyuvante genera toxicidad grado III-IV importante en un gran porcentaje de pacientes, lo cual limita su uso en la práctica clínica. 4) En el análisis de datos de la población de pacientes con diagnóstico de melanoma operado del INEN, la mediana de sobrevida libre de progresión fue de 1.72 años y la mediana de sobrevida global fue 2.78 años. El 60% de la población tuvo RAMS I-II y el 30% tuvo RAMS-III-IV. 5) En la actualidad el IFNα podría utilizarse como tratamiento adyuvante en pacientes con estadío II C ulcerado o en aquellos pacientes con estadio III que no tengan acceso a inmunoterapia.


Subject(s)
Humans , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Interferon-alpha/therapeutic use , Melanoma/drug therapy , Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Health Evaluation
8.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 28(8): 4637-4646, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33400000

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal metastases portend poor prognosis in the setting of standard chemotherapy. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) improves outcomes, but relapse is common. We report a phase II trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of adjuvant αDC1 vaccination with chemokine modulation (CKM) after CRS/HIPEC. METHODS: Patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for appendiceal cancer, colorectal cancer, or peritoneal mesothelioma were enrolled. In addition to standard adjuvant chemotherapy, patients received intranodal and intradermal injections of autologous tumor-loaded αDC1 vaccine. After each vaccine booster, patients received CKM over 4 days, consisting of celecoxib, interferon (IFN)-α, and rintatolimod. RESULTS: Forty-six patients underwent CRS/HIPEC followed by αDC1 treatment, including 24 appendiceal primaries, 20 colorectal, and 2 mesotheliomas. DC maturation was successful, with 97% expressing HLA-DR and CD86. Tumor cell recovery from peritoneal tumors was challenging, resulting in only 17% of patients receiving the target dose of αDC1. The αDC1 and CKM regimen was well tolerated. CKM successfully modulated serum inflammatory cytokine and chemokine levels. Median progression-free survival (PFS) for appendiceal primaries was 50.4, 34.2, and 8.9 months for grade 1, 2, and 3 tumors, respectively, while median PFS for colorectal cancer was 20.5 and 8.9 months for moderately and poorly differentiated tumors, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant autologous tumor antigen-loaded αDC1 vaccine and CKM is well tolerated. The mucinous nature of peritoneal metastases limits the feasibility of obtaining adequate autologous tumor cells. The improvement in median PFS did not meet our predefined thresholds, leading us to conclude that αDC1 vaccination is not appropriate for patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for peritoneal metastases.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Hyperthermia, Induced , Peritoneal Neoplasms , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Celecoxib/therapeutic use , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures , Dendritic Cells , Humans , Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy , Interferon-alpha/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Peritoneal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Poly I-C , Poly U
9.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(35): e21825, 2020 Aug 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32871904

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a meta-analysis evaluating the effect of combining traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) with Western medicine in treating hepatitis C, and to provide an evidence-based medical strategy. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of pegylated interferon (Peginterferon) combined with ribavirin (PR) alone and its combination with TCM were manually retrieved from the Weipu Information Resources System (VIP), Wan Fang Database, PubMed, and the Chinese Journal Full Text Database (CNKI). Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were selected and analyzed using the Review Manager 5.3 software. Suitable tests were also performed to determine the quality, heterogeneity, and sensitivity of the studies included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The combination therapy or intervention group showed significantly greater HCV-RNA negative rate post-treatment compared to the monotherapy or the control group (P < .05). In addition, the serum levels of the liver function indicators alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and albumin (ALB) were significantly improved after the combination therapy compared to PR alone (P < .05), while total bilirubin (TB) and r-glutamyltransferase (GGT) levels were not affected by TCM (P > .05). Finally, the parameters of liver fibrosis were also reduced by the combination therapy more effectively than the monotherapy. CONCLUSION: The combination of TCM and PR can improve the Comprehensive Clinical Efficacy of hepatitis C and have a better negative rate of HCV-RNA with a better benefit in the liver function. The effect of TCM + PR is better than that of PR alone in treating hepatitis C.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Hepatitis C/therapy , Medicine, Chinese Traditional , Alanine Transaminase/blood , Aspartate Aminotransferases/blood , Bilirubin/blood , Combined Modality Therapy , Drug Therapy, Combination , Hepacivirus/genetics , Humans , Interferon-alpha/therapeutic use , Liver Cirrhosis/drug therapy , Polyethylene Glycols/therapeutic use , RNA, Viral/blood , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use , Ribavirin/therapeutic use , Serum Albumin , gamma-Glutamyltransferase/blood
10.
Eur J Dermatol ; 30(4): 389-396, 2020 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32815816

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Targeted therapies such as BRAF and MEK inhibitors and immunotherapies have been made available to treat melanoma. OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of the management of the French Stage III melanoma population after complete lymph node resection prior to new adjuvant therapies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A subgroup data analysis. RESULTS: Data from 1,835 patients were analysed (15.58% Stage IIIA, 39.24% Stage IIIB, 43.92% Stage IIIC and 1.25% Stage IIID). Superficial spreading melanoma was the most frequent (70.98% in Stage IIIA for whom mutation analysis was performed; BRAF mutation was identified in up to 62% Stage IIIA patients). Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in 88.46% of Stage IIIA patients, 42.36% of Stage IIIB, 53.97% of Stage IIIC and 34.78% of Stage IIID. Up to 80% of Stage IIIA patients had no adjuvant treatment follow-up. Ulceration (p = 0.004; RR: 2.98; 95% CI: 1.4-6.3) and age at diagnosis (p = 0.0002; RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02-1.06) were significant predictive factors for survival. Adjuvant interferon-α was administered in up to 13.04% of Stage IIID patients. CONCLUSION: Only a small number of Stage III melanoma patients were treated with interferon-α in adjuvant settings. New adjuvant therapies are currently having an effect on clinical practice in France, increasing survival and decreasing cost.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Interferon-alpha/therapeutic use , Melanoma/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Age of Onset , Aged , Databases, Factual , Female , France , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Lymph Node Excision , Male , Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/surgery , Middle Aged , Mutation , Neoplasm Staging , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Survival Analysis , Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant
11.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 7: CD008946, 2020 07 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32632956

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, a malignant, chronic disease initially affecting the skin. Several therapies are available, which may induce clinical remission for a time. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2012: we wanted to assess new trials, some of which investigated new interventions. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of interventions for MF in all stages of the disease. SEARCH METHODS: We updated our searches of the following databases to May 2019: the Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS. We searched 2 trials registries for additional references. For adverse event outcomes, we undertook separate searches in MEDLINE in April, July and November 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of local or systemic interventions for MF in adults with any stage of the disease compared with either another local or systemic intervention or with placebo. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. The primary outcomes were improvement in health-related quality of life as defined by participants, and common adverse effects of the treatments. Key secondary outcomes were complete response (CR), defined as complete disappearance of all clinical evidence of disease, and objective response rate (ORR), defined as proportion of patients with a partial or complete response. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence and considered comparisons of psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) light treatment as most important because this is first-line treatment for MF in most guidelines. MAIN RESULTS: This review includes 20 RCTs (1369 participants) covering a wide range of interventions. The following were assessed as either treatments or comparators: imiquimod, peldesine, hypericin, mechlorethamine, nitrogen mustard and intralesional injections of interferon-α (IFN-α) (topical applications); PUVA, extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP: photochemotherapy), and visible light (light applications); acitretin, bexarotene, lenalidomide, methotrexate and vorinostat (oral agents); brentuximab vedotin; denileukin diftitox; mogamulizumab; chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, and vincristine; a combination of chemotherapy with electron beam radiation; subcutaneous injection of IFN-α; and intramuscular injections of active transfer factor (parenteral systemics). Thirteen trials used an active comparator, five were placebo-controlled, and two compared an active operator to observation only. In 14 trials, participants had MF in clinical stages IA to IIB. All participants were treated in secondary and tertiary care settings, mainly in Europe, North America or Australia. Trials recruited both men and women, with more male participants overall. Trial duration varied from four weeks to 12 months, with one longer-term study lasting more than six years. We judged 16 trials as at high risk of bias in at least one domain, most commonly performance bias (blinding of participants and investigators), attrition bias and reporting bias. None of our key comparisons measured quality of life, and the two studies that did presented no usable data. Eighteen studies reported common adverse effects of the treatments. Adverse effects ranged from mild symptoms to lethal complications depending upon the treatment type. More aggressive treatments like systemic chemotherapy generally resulted in more severe adverse effects. In the included studies, CR rates ranged from 0% to 83% (median 31%), and ORR ranged from 0% to 88% (median 47%). Five trials assessed PUVA treatment, alone or combined, summarised below. There may be little to no difference between intralesional IFN-α and PUVA compared with PUVA alone for 24 to 52 weeks in CR (risk ratio (RR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 1.31; 2 trials; 122 participants; low-certainty evidence). Common adverse events and ORR were not measured. One small cross-over trial found once-monthly ECP for six months may be less effective than twice-weekly PUVA for three months, reporting CR in two of eight participants and ORR in six of eight participants after PUVA, compared with no CR or ORR after ECP (very low-certainty evidence). Some participants reported mild nausea after PUVA but no numerical data were given. One participant in the ECP group withdrew due to hypotension. However, we are unsure of the results due to very low-certainty evidence. One trial comparing bexarotene plus PUVA versus PUVA alone for up to 16 weeks reported one case of photosensitivity in the bexarotene plus PUVA group compared to none in the PUVA-alone group (87 participants; low-certainty evidence). There may be little to no difference between bexarotene plus PUVA and PUVA alone in CR (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.80) and ORR (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.44) (93 participants; low-certainty evidence). One trial comparing subcutaneous IFN-α injections combined with either acitretin or PUVA for up to 48 weeks or until CR indicated there may be little to no difference in the common IFN-α adverse effect of flu-like symptoms (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.88; 82 participants). There may be lower CR with IFN-α and acitretin compared with IFN-α and PUVA (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.84; 82 participants) (both outcomes: low-certainty evidence). This trial did not measure ORR. One trial comparing PUVA maintenance treatment to no maintenance treatment, in participants who had already had CR, did report common adverse effects. However, the distribution was not evaluable. CR and OR were not assessable. The range of treatment options meant that rare adverse effects consequently occurred in a variety of organs. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: ​​There is a lack of high-certainty evidence to support decision making in the treatment of MF. Because of substantial heterogeneity in design, missing data, small sample sizes, and low methodological quality, the comparative safety and efficacy of these interventions cannot be reliably established on the basis of the included RCTs. PUVA is commonly recommended as first-line treatment for MF, and we did not find evidence to challenge this recommendation. There was an absence of evidence to support the use of intralesional IFN-α or bexarotene in people receiving PUVA and an absence of evidence to support the use of acitretin or ECP for treating MF. Future trials should compare the safety and efficacy of treatments to PUVA, as the current standard of care, and should measure quality of life and common adverse effects.


Subject(s)
Mycosis Fungoides/therapy , Skin Neoplasms/therapy , Acitretin/adverse effects , Acitretin/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Bexarotene/therapeutic use , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Humans , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Interferon-alpha/therapeutic use , Mycosis Fungoides/pathology , Neoplasm Staging/methods , PUVA Therapy/methods , Photochemotherapy/methods , Photopheresis/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Skin Neoplasms/pathology
12.
Cell Host Microbe ; 28(3): 455-464.e2, 2020 09 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32707096

ABSTRACT

Interferons (IFNs) are widely used in treating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. However, a recent report of ACE2, the host factor mediating SARS-Cov-2 infection, identifying it as interferon-stimulated raised considerable safety concern. To examine the association between the use and timing of IFN-α2b and clinical outcomes, we analyzed in a retrospective multicenter cohort study of 446 COVID-19 patients in Hubei, China. Regression models estimated that early administration (≤5 days after admission) of IFN-α2b was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality in comparison with no admission of IFN-α2b, whereas late administration of IFN-α2b was associated with increased mortality. Among survivors, early IFN-α2b was not associated with hospital discharge or computed tomography (CT) scan improvement, whereas late IFN-α2b was associated with delayed recovery. Additionally, early IFN-α2b and umifenovir alone or together were associated with reduced mortality and accelerated recovery in comparison with treatment with lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) alone. We concluded that administration of IFN-α2b during the early stage of COVID-19 could induce favorable clinical responses.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Interferon-alpha/therapeutic use , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 , Child , China/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Hospital Mortality , Host Microbial Interactions/drug effects , Humans , Indoles/administration & dosage , Interferon alpha-2 , Interferon-alpha/administration & dosage , Length of Stay , Lopinavir/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Ritonavir/administration & dosage , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
13.
Brasília; s.n; 8 jun. 2020. 24 p.
Non-conventional in Portuguese | LILACS, BRISA, PIE | ID: biblio-1100298

ABSTRACT

O Informe Diário de Evidências é uma produção do Ministério da Saúde que tem como objetivo acompanhar diariamente as publicações científicas sobre tratamento farmacológico e vacinas para a COVID-19. Dessa forma, são realizadas buscas estruturadas em bases de dados biomédicas, referente ao dia anterior desse informe. Não são incluídos estudos pré-clínicos (in vitro, in vivo, in silico). A frequência dos estudos é demonstrada de acordo com a sua classificação metodológica (revisões sistemáticas, ensaios clínicos randomizados, coortes, entre outros). Para cada estudo é apresentado um resumo com avaliação da qualidade metodológica. Essa avaliação tem por finalidade identificar o grau de certeza/confiança ou o risco de viés de cada estudo. Para tal, são utilizadas ferramentas já validadas e consagradas na literatura científica, na área de saúde baseada em evidências. Cabe ressaltar que o documento tem caráter informativo e não representa uma recomendação oficial do Ministério da Saúde sobre a temática. Foram encontrados 13 artigos.


Subject(s)
Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Betacoronavirus/drug effects , Acetylcysteine/therapeutic use , Technology Assessment, Biomedical , gamma-Globulins/therapeutic use , Immunoglobulins/therapeutic use , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , BCG Vaccine , Influenza Vaccines , Famotidine/therapeutic use , Autohemotherapy , Chloroquine/therapeutic use , Colchicine/therapeutic use , Interferon-alpha/therapeutic use , Ritonavir/therapeutic use , Pneumococcal Vaccines , Lopinavir/therapeutic use , Observational Study , Nitric Oxide/therapeutic use
16.
Arch Physiol Biochem ; 126(2): 116-128, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30269604

ABSTRACT

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a significant public health problem, with a worldwide prevalence of approximately 170 million. Current therapy for HCV infection includes the prolonged administration of a combination of ribavirin and PEGylated interferon-α, for over a decade. This regimen is expensive and often associated with a poor antiviral response and unwanted side effects. A highly effective combination treatment is likely required for the future management of HCV infections and entry inhibitors could play an important role. Currently, no entry inhibitor has been licensed for the prophylactic treatment of hepatitis C. Therefore, additional agents that combat HCV infection are urgently needed and must be developed. Many phytochemical constituents have been identified that display considerable inhibition of HCV at some stage of the life cycle. This review will summarise the current state of knowledge on natural products and their possible activities in the context of HCV infection.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Flavonoids/therapeutic use , Hepacivirus/drug effects , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Antiviral Agents/chemistry , Antiviral Agents/isolation & purification , Aquatic Organisms/chemistry , Biological Products/chemistry , Biological Products/isolation & purification , Clinical Trials as Topic , Drug Therapy, Combination , Flavonoids/isolation & purification , Hepacivirus/genetics , Hepacivirus/growth & development , Hepacivirus/metabolism , Hepatitis C, Chronic/pathology , Hepatitis C, Chronic/virology , Humans , Interferon-alpha/therapeutic use , Plant Extracts/chemistry , Ribavirin/therapeutic use
17.
Br J Ophthalmol ; 104(8): 1045-1051, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31676596

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Biologics are increasingly used in management of Behçet's Disease (BD) including ocular BD, but the evidence base is limited, mostly from studies of uveitis and BD manifestations. OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence base for biologics in the treatment of ocular BD. METHODS: Systematic literature search was made using exploded key words-Behçet's, ocular, biologics in MEDLINE, Cochrane library, Database of Abstracts Reviews and Effects, Clinical Trials.gov, Science Direct and Google Scholar. There was no limitation on region, language or date (Search updated 16th October 2018). Literature retrieval was restricted to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of biologics. RESULTS: Of 237 papers retrieved, eight met the inclusion criteria. RCTs on interferon alpha 2a (INF-α 2a), adalimumab, secukinumab, gevokizumab, rituximab and daclizumab were retrieved (two for adalimumab and gevokizumab). The outcome measures were not met for secukinumab, daclizumab and gevokizumab. Rituximab and INF-α 2a showed promising preliminary results but sufficiently powered RCTs are needed to provide adequate evidence of efficacy. The RCTs on adalimumab did not evaluate efficacy for BD uveitis specifically, hence are of limited value for this review. CONCLUSION: Some biologics show promise in treating BD uveitis, but more RCTs are needed for firm conclusions about efficacy. A phase IV study or, registry of adalimumab could provide data on its efficacy in BD uveitis compared to other forms.


Subject(s)
Behcet Syndrome/therapy , Biological Factors/therapeutic use , Biological Therapy/methods , Uveitis/therapy , Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Daclizumab/therapeutic use , Humans , Interferon-alpha/therapeutic use , Rituximab/therapeutic use
18.
Arch Psychiatr Nurs ; 33(4): 352-357, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31280779

ABSTRACT

Hepatitis C virus is a blood borne pathogen that infects 130 million people worldwide. After a prolonged period of slowly progressive liver injury, those infected are at risk of advancing to end stage liver disease, with its associated complications, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Rates of past and/or current substance use and behavioral comorbidities are higher among those infected with hepatitis C compared to the general population. A number of patient, provider and system barriers to care and treatment have led to low rates of treatment initiation in this population despite pharmacologic advances that have made hepatitis C a curable disease. Innovation in care delivery is considered a key strategy that will help reach more patients. We present three case studies of patients with chronic hepatitis C and multiple psychiatric comorbidities who were successfully engaged in care and treated for their chronic hepatitis C in our multidisciplinary primary care-based program.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Comorbidity , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Interferon-alpha/therapeutic use , Interprofessional Relations , Personality Disorders/psychology , Polyethylene Glycols/therapeutic use , Ribavirin/therapeutic use , Sofosbuvir/therapeutic use , Adult , Anemia/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Primary Health Care , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use , Substance-Related Disorders/complications
20.
Value Health ; 21(12): 1413-1418, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30502785

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index Disease-Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) is important to gauge clinical benefit in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). OBJECTIVES: To estimate important difference (ID) in FKSI-DRS scores that is considered to be meaningful when comparing treatment effect between groups, using mRCC trial data. METHODS: Data were derived from two pivotal phase III mRCC trials comparing sunitinib versus interferon alfa (N = 750) in first-line mRCC, and axitinib versus sorafenib (N = 723) in second-line mRCC. The change from baseline in FKSI-DRS score was examined as a function of a set of anchors using the repeated-measures model. Several anchors were evaluated: FKSI item "I am bothered by side effects of treatment," EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire utility score, and adverse events. RESULTS: When the "I am bothered by side effects of treatment" score was used as an anchor, the ID ranged between 1.2 and 1.3 points. When change in the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire utility score was used as an anchor, the FKSI-DRS ID ranged between 0.62 and 0.63 points. Selecting the adverse events that corresponded to a maximum worsening in the FKSI-DRS score in either trial, the ID ranged between 0.62 and 0.74 points. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing treatment for mRCC, between-group differences in FKSI-DRS scores as low as 1 point might be meaningful.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/complications , Kidney Neoplasms/complications , Quality of Life , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Axitinib/adverse effects , Axitinib/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Interferon-alpha/adverse effects , Interferon-alpha/therapeutic use , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Sorafenib/adverse effects , Sorafenib/therapeutic use , Sunitinib/adverse effects , Sunitinib/therapeutic use , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL