Una aproximación actualizada hacia el tratamiento de la esclerosis múltiple / An updated approach to the treatment of multiple sclerosis

La presente es una revisión bibliográfica actualizada sobre el manejo de la Esclerosis Múltiple (EM), enfermedad neurológica progresiva de tipo desmielinizante más frecuente a nivel mundial. En Chile, su presentación remitente-recurrente (RRMS) es patología GES, por lo que se vuelve relevante para el médico general y estudiantes del área de la salud reconocer e identificar las terapias disponibles para el control de esta patología. Si bien la EM no es un cuadro frecuente, su sintomatología es alarmante e incapacitante, por lo que, con frecuencia, el primer acercamiento del paciente es a los servicios de urgencia, tornándose necesario contar con nociones básicas sobre el tratamiento y manejo. La presente revisión recopiló artículos publicados entre 2019 y 2023 de distintos motores de búsqueda con énfasis en el tratamiento farmacológico y no farmacológico de esta enfermedad. Además de describir el tratamiento convencional como la inmunomodulación, las terapias biológicas, el soporte con glucocorticoides y los fármacos remielinizantes, se abordan nuevas líneas de investigación prometedoras, como el rol inmunogénico de la microbiota intestinal, la capacidad epigenética de la dieta, estrategias de rehabilitación cognitiva y el potencial uso de cannabinoides para el manejo paliativo del dolor. Se concluye que un tratamiento oportuno con fármacos modificadores de la enfermedad, tanto de primera línea como de segunda, son imprescindibles para el manejo de la EM, sin embargo, la calidad de vida puede verse significativamente acrecentada por la incorporación de estrategias que se encuentran al alcance del médico general y que no requieren de derivación a nivel secundario.

This is an updated bibliographical review on the management of Multiple Sclerosis (MS), the most common progressive neurological disease of demyelinating disorders worldwide. In Chile, its relapsing-remitting presentation (RRMS) is a state-covered illness pathology, so it becomes relevant for the general practitioner and med students to recognize and identify therapies available for the control of this desease. Although MS is not a frequent condition, its symptoms are alarming and disabling, which is why, frequently, the first approach of the patient is to the emergency services, making it necessary to have basic knowledge about treatment and management. The present review compiled articles published between 2019 and 2023 from different search engines with an emphasis on the pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of the MS. In addition to describing conventional treatment such as immunomodulation, biological therapies, glucocorticoid support and remyelinating drugs, new promising lines of research are addressed, such as the immunogenic role of the intestinal microbiota, the epigenetic capacity of the diet, strategies on cognition rehabilitation and the potential use of cannabinoids for the palliative management of pain. It is concluded that the classic treatment with disease-modifying drugs, both first-line and second-line, are essential for the management of MS; however, quality of life can be significantly increased by incorporating strategies found at the reach of the general practitioner and do not require referral at a greater complexity center.

Efficacy of Interferon-Based Therapy for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of interferon (IFN)-based therapy for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) based on relevant qualified studies. We searched for pertinent studies using keywords via PubMed, Cochrane and Embase databases. Studies from other pertinent sources and that were published before September 2021 were also reviewed. Methods: For each study, we assessed and synthesized the outcomes by relative risk (RR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) combined with a 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 8 studies involving 2442 patients with COVID-19 were evaluated in this meta-analysis. Results: The IFN group had a significant decrease in ICU admissions (RR: 0.705; 95% CI, 0.515-0.964) and death (RR: 0.416; 95% CI, 0.217-0.797), and increased duration of ICU stay (WMD: 0.996; 95% CI, 0.834-1.158) compared with the control group in the randomized clinical trial (RCT) subgroup analysis. In non-RCT subgroup analysis, the IFN group showed a significant increase in discharge rate (RR: 1.052; 95% CI, 1.004-1.101) compared with the control group. Conclusion: IFN therapy appears to have better efficacy than non-IFN therapy as sedatives in patients with COVID-19 in terms of decreasing ICU admissions and death and increasing discharge. However, more high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.

Long-term survival with sorafenib-based multidisciplinary treatment for Vp4 hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report.

The prognosis of highly advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with a portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is poor. There are currently no reports of long-term survival for up to 5 years in patients with advanced HCC who were treated with sorafenib. We describe a patient with Vp4 HCC who was treated with a sorafenib-based multidisciplinary treatment and experienced long-term survival, which may be the longest survival to date. A man in his late 60 s presented with general fatigue. Eight years previously, he received interferon monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C for 48 weeks and achieved a sustained virological response. He was diagnosed with a PVTT (Vp4) with diffuse-type HCC in the S6 lobe of the liver. He received hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin. Because of the occurrence of adverse effects, he was placed on sorafenib treatment. The treatment was effective and the HCC reduced. However, after 3 years of treatment, a 2-cm HCC was observed in the S5 lobe, and the patient underwent laparoscopic partial hepatectomy. After the operation, he continued to receive sorafenib, with no obvious recurrence, and survived for over 108 months after the first treatment. There are currently no reported cases of long-term progression-free survival by sorafenib for five years in patients of Vp4 HCC. In conclusion, we report a case of longest survival of a patient with Vp4 HCC treated with sorafenib-based multidisciplinary treatment.

Interferon therapy in patients with SARS, MERS, and COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies.

Concern regarding coronavirus (CoV) outbreaks has stayed relevant to global health in the last decades. Emerging COVID-19 infection, caused by the novel SARS-CoV2, is now a pandemic, bringing a substantial burden to human health. Interferon (IFN), combined with other antivirals and various treatments, has been used to treat and prevent MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV, and SARS-CoV2 infections. We aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of IFN-based treatments and combinational therapy with antivirals, corticosteroids, traditional medicine, and other treatments. Major healthcare databases and grey literature were investigated. A three-stage screening was utilized, and included studies were checked against the protocol eligibility criteria. Risk of bias assessment and data extraction were performed, followed by narrative data synthesis. Fifty-five distinct studies of SARS-CoV2, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV were spotted. Our narrative synthesis showed a possible benefit in the use of IFN. A good quality cohort showed lower CRP levels in Arbidol (ARB) + IFN group vs. IFN only group. Another study reported a significantly shorter chest X-ray (CXR) resolution in IFN-Alfacon-1 + corticosteroid group compared with the corticosteroid only group in SARS-CoV patients. In a COVID-19 trial, total adverse drug events (ADEs) were much lower in the Favipiravir (FPV) + IFN-α group compared with the LPV/RTV arm (P = 0.001). Also, nausea in patients receiving FPV + IFN-α regimen was significantly lower (P = 0.03). Quantitative analysis of mortality did not show a conclusive effect for IFN/RBV treatment in six moderately heterogeneous MERS-CoV studies (log OR = -0.05, 95% CI: (-0.71,0.62), I2 = 44.71%). A meta-analysis of three COVID-19 studies did not show a conclusive nor meaningful relation between receiving IFN and COVID-19 severity (log OR = -0.44, 95% CI: (-1.13,0.25), I2 = 31.42%). A lack of high-quality cohorts and controlled trials was observed. Evidence suggests the potential efficacy of several combination IFN therapies such as lower ADEs, quicker resolution of CXR, or a decrease in inflammatory cytokines; Still, these options must possibly be further explored before being recommended in public guidelines. For all major CoVs, our results may indicate a lack of a definitive effect of IFN treatment on mortality. We recommend such therapeutics be administered with extreme caution until further investigation uncovers high-quality evidence in favor of IFN or combination therapy with IFN.

Yin and Yang: The dual effects of interferons on hematopoiesis.

Interferons are an ancient and well-conserved group of inflammatory cytokines most famous for their role in viral immunity. A decade ago, we discovered that interferons also play an important role in the biology of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), which are responsible for lifelong blood production. Though we have learned a great deal about the role of interferons on HSC quiescence, differentiation, and self-renewal, there remains some controversy regarding how interferons impact these stem cells, with differing conclusions depending on experimental models and clinical context. Here, we review the contradictory roles of Type 1 and 2 interferons in hematopoiesis. Specifically, we highlight the roles of interferons in embryonic and adult hematopoiesis, along with short-term and long-term adaptive and maladaptive responses to inflammation. We discuss experimental challenges in the study of these powerful yet short-lived cytokines and strategies to address those challenges. We further review the contribution by interferons to disease states including bone marrow failure and aplastic anemia as well as their therapeutic use to treat myeloproliferative neoplasms and viral infections, including SARS-CoV2. Understanding the opposing effects of interferons on hematopoiesis will elucidate immune responses and bone marrow failure syndromes, and future therapeutic approaches for patients undergoing HSC transplantation or fighting infectious diseases and cancer.

[Consensus on HPV of the Portuguese Society of Andrology, Sexual Medicine and Reproduction: Treatment]. / Consensos em HPV Masculino da Sociedade Portuguesa de Andrologia, Medicina Sexual e Reprodução: Tratamento.

The treatment of condyloma is generally a challenge in clinical practice. Although the spontaneous resolution rate is high, a significant proportion of patients seek treatment, not because of symptomatology, but mainly for aesthetic issues and concerns related to the transmission or worsening of existing lesions. The available treatments should be applied only for clinically evident macroscopic lesions. Ideally, available therapies should have rapid action onset and clearance, resolve symptoms, reduce recurrence rate and viral load, be effective in treating small lesions, and be well tolerated. However, none of the currently available treatments is clearly more effective than the others and there is no ideal treatment for all patients or for all condyloma. Therefore, the therapeutic decision should be based on the clinician's experience, available resources, lesion morphology, size, number and location, primary or recurrent lesions, disease severity, patient preference and expectations, patient's immune competence, convenience, tolerance, cost of treatment and results of previous therapies. The available treatments are divided into three groups: applied by the patient himself (imiquimod 3.75 or 5%, podophyllotoxin .5%, synecatekines 10% or 15%), applied by the health care provider (bi- and tricloacetic acids 80%-90%, intralesional interferon alpha, cryotherapy, surgical removal, electrofulguration, laser ablation) and experimental or alternative therapies (topical cidofovir, intralesional bleomycin, photodynamic therapy). Treatment methodologies can be further divided into their action - ablative or destructive treatment (cryotherapy, electrofulguration, laser ablation, surgical excision), cytotoxic or proapoptotic treatments (podophyllotoxin .5%, 5-fluoruracil, bleomycin) and immunomodulatory treatments (imiquimod 3.75% or 5%, synecatekines 10% or 15%, intralesional interferon alpha). The overall success rate of the various treatments available ranges from 23% to 94%. Only treatments that include cryotherapy or surgical excision are suitable in condyloma with any anatomical location and that have the highest success rate in monotherapy. Recurrences are common regardless of the treatment received. In contrast, immunomodulatory therapies despite having lower initial clearance rates appear to have higher probabilities of cure in the medium term, with low recurrence rates. Some treatments may be combined with each other and the effectiveness of combined therapies appears to be superior to monotherapy (proactive sequential treatment). The consensuses for the treatment of HPV also consider special situations: immunocompromised patients, meatus and intraurethral lesions and treatment of the partner.

Anemia diseritropoyética congénita tipo I: una mirada actualizada de sus bases moleculares, diagnóstico y tratamiento / Congenital dyserythropoietic anemia type I: an updated review about its molecular bases, diagnosis and treatment

Introducción: Las anemias diseritropoyéticas congénitas constituyen un grupo de trastornos hereditarios caracterizados por anemia refractaria, eritropoyesis ineficaz y alteraciones morfológicas de los eritroblastos. La anemia diseritropoyética congénita tipo I es la más frecuente, no obstante, constituye una rara enfermedad con particularidades morfológicas y moleculares. Objetivo: Analizar los aspectos más novedosos en cuanto a la patogenia molecular, el diagnóstico genético y el tratamiento de la anemia diseritropoyética congénita tipo I. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión de la literatura, en inglés y español. Se utilizaron motores de búsqueda como Google académico y Pubmed que permitió el acceso a artículos actualizados del tema. Se hizo un análisis y resumen de la bibliografía revisada. Análisis y síntesis de la información: La anemia diseritropoyética congénita tipo I es una enfermedad hereditaria autosómica recesiva. Se caracteriza por anemia de grado variable, reticulocitopenia, alteraciones morfológicas de la serie roja en la lámina periférica y un número elevado de eritroblastos binucleados conectados por puentes internucleares en el aspirado de médula ósea. Se han identificado múltiples alteraciones moleculares que involucran fundamentalmente a los genes CDAN1 y C15orf41. Las proteínas codificadas por estos genes participan en proceso vitales como el ciclo celular, la reparación del ADN y la transcripción de ARN. Conclusiones: El estudio de las bases moleculares de la anemia diseritropoyética congénita tipo I ha cambiado la perspectiva en el diagnóstico de esta enfermedad. Los protocolos de tratamiento son similares a otras anemias hemolíticas hereditarias aunque se destaca el uso del Interferón-α(AU)

Introduction: Congenital dyserythropoietic anemias belong to a group of hereditary disorders characterized by refractory anemia, ineffective erythropoiesis and morphological alterations of erythroblasts. Congenital dyserythropoietic anemia type I is the most frequent; however, it is a rare disease with morphological and molecular characteristics. Objective: To analyze the most updated aspects regarding molecular pathogenesis, genetic diagnosis and treatment of congenital dyserythropoietic anemia type I. Methods: A review of the literature in English and Spanish was carried out. Search engines such as Google Scholar and Pubmed were used, which allowed access to updated articles on the subject. An analysis and summary of the revised bibliography was carried out. Information analysis and synthesis: Congenital dyserythropoietic anemia type I is an autosomal recessive hereditary disease. It is characterized by anemia of variable degree, reticulocytopenia, morphological alterations of the red series in the peripheral lamina, and high number of binucleated erythroblasts connected by internuclear bridges in the bone marrow aspirate. Multiple molecular alterations have been identified, mainly involving the CDAN1 and C15orf41 genes. The proteins encoded by these genes participate in vital processes, such as the cell cycle, DNA repair, and RNA transcription. Conclusions: The study of the molecular bases of congenital dyserythropoietic anemia type I has changed the perspective concerning the diagnosis of this disease. Treatment protocols are similar to other hereditary hemolytic anemias, although the use of Interferon-α stands out(AU)

An overview of the safety, clinical application and antiviral research of the COVID-19 therapeutics.

Since a novel coronavirus pneumonia outbreak in late December 2019, coronavirus disease -19 (COVID-19) epidemic has gradually spread worldwide, becoming a major public health event. No specific antivirals are currently available for COVID-19 caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The treatments for COVID-19 are mainly based on the experiences of similar virus such SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, HIV and influenza viruses. Scientists have taken great efforts to investigate the effective methods for the treatment of COVID-19. Up to now, there are over 1000 clinical studies for COVID-19 all over the world. In this article, we reviewed the current options for COVID-19 therapy including small molecules such as Remdesivir, Favipiravir, Lopinavir/Ritonavir etc, peptide inhibitors of ACE2, Traditional Chinese Medicines and Biologics such as SARS-CoV-2-specific neutralizing antibodies, mesenchymal stem cells and vaccines etc. Meanwhile, we systematically reviewed their clinical safety, clinical applications and progress of antiviral researches. The therapeutic effect of these antiviral drugs is summarized and compared, hoping to provide some ideas for clinical options of COVID-19 treatment and also provide experiences for the life-threatening virus diseases in the future.

Antiviral mechanisms of candidate chemical medicines and traditional Chinese medicines for SARS-CoV-2 infection.

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has rapidly become a global pandemic. Up to now, numerous medicines have been applied or approved for the prevention and control of the virus infection. However, the efficiency of each medicine or combination is completely different or still unknown. In this review, we discuss the types, characteristics, antiviral mechanisms, and shortcomings of recommended candidate medicines for SARS-CoV-2 infection, as well as perspectives of the drugs for the disease treatment, which may provide a theoretical basis for drug screening and application.

Treatment strategies of hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease-19.

With the outbreak of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19), Changsha faced an increasing burden of treating the Wuhan migrants and their infected patients. This study is a retrospective, single-center case series of the 238 consecutive hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 at the First Hospital of Changsha city, China, from 01/21 to 02/14, 2020; the final date of follow-up was 02/27, 2020. Of 238 patients 43.7% visited Wuhan, 58.4% got in touch with Wuhan people, and 47.5% had contacted with diagnosed patients. 37.8% patients had family members infected. 190 cases had mild / general disease, and 48 cases had severe / critical disease. Compared to mild or general patients, more severe or critical patients visited Wuhan (59.6% vs 40.2%; P=0.02) and contacted with Wuhan people (74.5% vs 55.0%; P=0.02). All patients received antiviral treatment, including Lopinavir / Ritonavir (29.3%), Interferon (14.6%) and their combination (40.6%), Arbidol (6.7%), Xuebijing (7.1%) and Chloroquine phosphate (1.3%). Severe and critical patients received glucocorticoid, Gamma-globulin and oxygen inhalation. Some received mechanic ventilation support. As of 02/27, 161 patients discharged. The median length of hospital stay was 13 days. The 10-, 14-, 20- and 28-day discharge rate was 19.1%, 42.8%, 65.0% and 76.4%, respectively. No hospital-related transmission was observed.

Potential drugs for the treatment of the novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) in China.

The fight against the novel coronavirus pneumonia (namely COVID-19) that seriously harms human health is a common task for all mankind. Currently, development of drugs against the novel coronavirus (namely SARS-CoV-2) is quite urgent. Chinese medical workers and scientific researchers have found some drugs to play potential therapeutic effects on COVID-19 at the cellular level or in preliminary clinical trials. However, more fundamental studies and large sample clinical trials need to be done to ensure the efficacy and safety of these drugs. The adoption of these drugs without further testing must be careful. The relevant articles, news, and government reports published on the official and Preprint websites, PubMed and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases from December 2019 to April 2020 were searched and manually filtered. The general pharmacological characteristics, indications, adverse reactions, general usage, and especially current status of the treatment of COVID-19 of those potentially effective drugs, including chemical drugs, traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs), and biological products in China were summarized in this review to guide reasonable medication and the development of specific drugs for the treatment of COVID-19.

Informe diário de evidências COVID-19: busca realizada em 5 de maio de 2020 / COVID-19 daily evidence report: search conducted on May 5, 2020

Essa é uma produção do Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia (Decit) da Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovação e Insumos Estratégicos em Saúde (SCTIE) do Ministério da Saúde (Decit/SCTIE/MS), que tem como missão promover a ciência e tecnologia e o uso de evidências científicas para a tomada de decisão do SUS, tendo como principal atribuição o incentivo ao desenvolvimento de pesquisas em saúde no Brasil, de modo a direcionar os investimentos realizados em pesquisa pelo Governo Federal às necessidades de saúde pública. Informar sobre as principais evidências científicas descritas na literatura internacional sobre tratamento farmacológico para a COVID-19. Além de resumir cada estudo identificado, o informe apresenta também uma avaliação da qualidade metodológica e a quantidade de artigos publicados, de acordo com a sua classificação metodológica (revisões sistemáticas, ensaios clínicos randomizados, entre outros). Foram encontrados 10 artigos e 20 protocolos.

Current status of potential therapeutic candidates for the COVID-19 crisis.

As of April 15, 2020, the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-2019) pandemic has swept through 213 countries and infected more than 1,870,000 individuals, posing an unprecedented threat to international health and the economy. There is currently no specific treatment available for patients with COVID-19 infection. The lessons learned from past management of respiratory viral infections have provided insights into treating COVID-19. Numerous potential therapies, including supportive intervention, immunomodulatory agents, antiviral therapy, and convalescent plasma transfusion, have been tentatively applied in clinical settings. A number of these therapies have provided substantially curative benefits in treating patients with COVID-19 infection. Furthermore, intensive research and clinical trials are underway to assess the efficacy of existing drugs and identify potential therapeutic targets to develop new drugs for treating COVID-19. Herein, we summarize the current potential therapeutic approaches for diseases related to COVID-19 infection and introduce their mechanisms of action, safety, and effectiveness.

Clinical features and treatment of COVID-19 patients in northeast Chongqing.

The outbreak of the novel coronavirus in China (SARS-CoV-2) that began in December 2019 presents a significant and urgent threat to global health. This study was conducted to provide the international community with a deeper understanding of this new infectious disease. Epidemiological, clinical features, laboratory findings, radiological characteristics, treatment, and clinical outcomes of 135 patients in northeast Chongqing were collected and analyzed in this study. A total of 135 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were enrolled. The median age was 47 years (interquartile range, 36-55), and there was no significant gender difference (53.3% men). The majority of patients had contact with people from the Wuhan area. Forty-three (31.9%) patients had underlying disease, primarily hypertension (13 [9.6%]), diabetes (12 [8.9%]), cardiovascular disease (7 [5.2%]), and malignancy (4 [3.0%]). Common symptoms included fever (120 [88.9%]), cough (102 [76.5%]), and fatigue (44 [32.5%]). Chest computed tomography scans showed bilateral patchy shadows or ground glass opacity in the lungs of all the patients. All patients received antiviral therapy (135 [100%]) (Kaletra and interferon were both used), antibacterial therapy (59 [43.7%]), and corticosteroids (36 [26.7%]). In addition, many patients received traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) (124 [91.8%]). It is suggested that patients should receive Kaletra early and should be treated by a combination of Western and Chinese medicines. Compared to the mild cases, the severe ones had lower lymphocyte counts and higher plasma levels of Pt, APTT, d-dimer, lactate dehydrogenase, PCT, ALB, C-reactive protein, and aspartate aminotransferase. This study demonstrates the clinic features and therapies of 135 COVID-19 patients. Kaletra and TCM played an important role in the treatment of the viral pneumonia. Further studies are required to explore the role of Kaletra and TCM in the treatment of COVID-19.

Detectable SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in feces of three children during recovery period of COVID-19 pneumonia.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a newly emerging infectious disease caused by a novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). After its first occurrence in Wuhan of China from December 2019, COVID-19 rapidly spread around the world. According to the World Health Organization statement on 13 March 2020, there had been over 132 500 confirmed cases globally. Nevertheless, the case reports of children are rare, which results in the lack of evidence for preventing and controlling of children's infection. Here, we report three cases of SARS-CoV-2 infected children diagnosed from 3 February to 17 February 2020 in Tianjin, China. All of these three cases experienced mild illness and recovered soon after the treatment, with the nucleic acid of throat swab turning negative within 14, 11, and 7 days after diagnosis, respectively. However, after been discharged, all three cases were tested SARS-CoV-2 positive in the stool samples within 10 days, in spite of their remained negative nucleic acid in throat swab specimens. Therefore, it is necessary to be aware of the possibility of fecal-oral transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially for children cases.

Isolated limb perfusion with melphalan activates interferon-stimulated genes to induce tumor regression in patients with melanoma in-transit metastasis.

Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with high-dose melphalan is a treatment option for melanoma patients with metastasis confined to limbs (in-transit metastasis). The therapy entails a complete response (CR) rate of 50-70%. Cellular immunity is proposed to impact on the clinical efficacy of ILP, but the detailed aspects of ILP-induced immune activation remain to be explored. For this study, we explored the potential role of interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) products, including CXCL10, CCL2, PD-L2 and IFN-γ along with expression of their cognate receptors CXCR3, CCR4, CCR5 and PD-1 on lymphocytes, for the clinical efficacy of ILP. Patients with high serum levels of CXCL10, CCL2, PD-L2 and IFN-γ were more likely to achieve CR after ILP. Additionally, the expression of CXCR3, CCR4 and CCR5 on T cells and/or natural killer (NK) cells was enhanced by ILP. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) secreted high levels of CXCL10, CCL2 and IFN-γ in response to co-culture with melphalan-exposed melanoma cells in vitro. Activated T cells migrated toward supernatants from these co-cultures. Furthermore, melphalan-exposed melanoma cells triggered upregulation of CXCR3, CCR4, CCR5 and PD-1 on co-cultured T cells and/or NK cells. Our results suggest that constituents released from melphalan-exposed melanoma cells stimulate the ISG axis with ensuing formation of chemokines and upregulation of chemokine receptor expression on anti-neoplastic immune cells, which may contribute in ILP-induced tumor regression.

Real-world use of extracorporeal photopheresis for patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma in the United States: 2010-2015.

Introduction: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer recommend extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) as systemic therapy for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL).Objective: To investigate real-world use of ECP in CTCL patients in the US.Methods: Data from the Truven MarketScan® database (2010-2015) were used to create a cohort of CTCL patients receiving systemic treatment. Multivariable regressions were performed to compare health care resource utilization between ECP and propensity score-matched non-ECP patients.Results: Of the 1106 eligible patients, 117 (10.6%) received ECP, with an average treatment duration of 13.6 months. Psoriasis, organ transplant, graft versus host disease, and scleroderma were the most common comorbidities. ECP was used as monotherapy in 76 patients (65.0%) and combination in 41 patients (35.0%), mostly with interferon and/or a retinoid. Higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (2.6 vs 2.2, p < .05), rates of organ transplant (49.6% vs 7.8%, p < .001), and graft vs host disease (41.9% vs 3.4%, p < .001) were observed in ECP versus non-ECP patients. Post-matching analyses showed that ECP patients had shorter all-cause inpatient stay (6.67 vs 11.80 days, p = .001).Conclusions: Approximately 1 out of 10 CTCL patients receiving systemic treatment were on ECP treatment in the US. Post-matching analysis showed ECP was associated with a shorter hospital stay.

Fármacos utilizados no tratamento do COVID-19 em pediatria: revisão integrativa / Drugs used for COVID ­19 treatment in pediatrics: an integrative review

A pandemia causada pelo novo coronavírus (2019-nCoV) tem causado milhares de mortes, sendo buscadas vacinas ou tratamentos específicos. Crianças não têm apresentado alta gravidade. Pretendeu-se identificar tratamentos disponíveis para a pediatria. Realizou-se revisão bibliográfica integrativa, incluindo estudos publicados entre o período de 1º de Janeiro e 24 de Abril de 2020, utilizando-se as palavras-chave: 2019-nCOV; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2 e Pediatrics. Foram pesquisados os bancos de dados PubMed, Periódicos CAPES, Science Direct, Scielo, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde e Lilacs. Um total de 10 artigos foram considerados elegíveis. Entre as principais classes terapêuticas citadas estavam os antivirais lopinavir/ritonavir, oseltamivir, o uso do interferon e de imunoglobulinas. Quase todos os tratamentos mencionados foram considerados potencialmente eficazes contra o COVID-19, no entanto ensaios clínicos são necessários para tal confirmação visto que há poucos estudos e que o uso dos medicamentos mencionados se encontra baseado no tratamento de outras doenças respiratória.(AU)

The pandemic caused by the new coronavirus (2019-nCoV) has been causing thousands of deaths, being searched vaccines or specific treatments. Children havenot shown high severity. The aim of this article was to identify available treatments for children. An integrative review of studies recently published between January 1st and April 24th of 2020 was carried out, using the keywords: 2019-nCOV; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2 and pediatrics. The PubMed, Períodicos CAPES, Science Direct, Scielo, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde and Lilacs databases were searched. A total of 10 articles were considered eligible. Among the main therapeutic classes cited were antivirals lopinavir/ritonavir, oseltamivir, the use of interferon and immunoglobulins. Almost all the treatments mentioned were considered to be potentially effective against COVID-19, however clinical trials are necessary for such confirmation since there are few studies and the use of the mentioned drugs is based on the treatment of other respiratory diseases.(AU)

Australian guidelines for the clinical care of people with COVID-19 - Australian National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce

This guideline aims to provide specific, patient-focused recommendations on management and care of people with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. With the exception of chemoprophylaxis for the prevention of infection in people exposed to COVID-19, the guideline does not include other interventions used in the prevention of COVID-19 infection or transmission. Within each recommendation, the patient population of interest is specified.