ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To help ensure that children and families get the right support and services at the right time, strong and stable relationships between various child service organizations are vital. Moreover, strong and stable relationships and a key network position for gatekeepers are important preconditions for interprofessional collaboration, the timely and appropriate referral of clients, and improved health outcomes. Gatekeepers are organizations that have specific legal authorizations regarding client referral. However, it is largely unclear how strong relations in child service networks are structured, whether the gatekeepers have strong and stable relationships, and what the critical relations in the overall structure are. The aim of this study is to explore these preconditions for integrated care by examining the internal structure and dynamics of strong relations. METHODS: A comparative case study approach and social network analysis of three inter-organizational networks consisting of 65 to 135 organizations within the Dutch child service system. Multiple network measures (number of active organizations, isolates, relations, average degree centrality, Lambda sets) were used to examine the strong relation structure and dynamics of the networks. Ucinet was used to analyze the data, with use of the statistical test: Quadratic Assignment Procedure. Visone was used to visualize the graphs of the networks. RESULTS: This study shows that more than 80% of the organizations in the networks have strong relations. A striking finding is the extremely high number of strong relations that gatekeepers need to maintain. Moreover, the results show that the most important gatekeepers have key positions, and their strong relations are relatively stable. By contrast, considering the whole network, we also found a considerable measure of instability in strong relationships, which means that child service networks must cope with major internal dynamics. CONCLUSIONS: Our study addressed crucial preconditions for integrated care. The extremely high number of strong relations that particularly gatekeepers need to build and maintain, in combination with the considerable instability of strong relations considering the whole network, is a serious point of concern that need to be managed, in order to enable child service networks to improve internal coordination and integration of service delivery.
HIGHLIGHTS: More than 80% of the organizations in the network has strong relations.Gatekeepers need to maintain an extremely high number of strong relations.Child service networks need to cope with major internal dynamics.These insights offer leads for optimizing how a network functions.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Social Network Analysis , Humans , Child , Social Networking , Interinstitutional Relations , Referral and ConsultationABSTRACT
The spread of multidrug resistant organisms (MDRO) is a global healthcare challenge. Nosocomial outbreaks caused by MDRO are an important contributor to this threat. Computer-based applications facilitating outbreak detection can be essential to address this issue. To allow application reusability across institutions, the various heterogeneous microbiology data representations needs to be transformed into standardised, unambiguous data models. In this work, we present a multi-centric standardisation approach by using openEHR as modelling standard. Data models have been consented in a multicentre and international approach. Participating sites integrated microbiology reports from primary source systems into an openEHR-based data platform. For evaluation, we implemented a prototypical application, compared the transformed data with original reports and conducted automated data quality checks. We were able to develop standardised and interoperable microbiology data models. The publicly available data models can be used across institutions to transform real-life microbiology reports into standardised representations. The implementation of a proof-of-principle and quality control application demonstrated that the new formats as well as the integration processes are feasible. Holistic transformation of microbiological data into standardised openEHR based formats is feasible in a real-life multicentre setting and lays the foundation for developing cross-institutional, automated outbreak detection systems.
Subject(s)
Cross Infection/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Electronic Health Records/standards , Computer Simulation , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Humans , Interinstitutional Relations , Proof of Concept Study , Reference StandardsABSTRACT
This article describes an academic-clinical partnership program between a school of nursing and an American Nurse Credentialing Center Magnet®- and National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center based on a shared vision and multifaceted for optimal new graduate operating room (OR) recruitment and use of clinical partner resources. The program, now in its 3rd year, has a 100% retention rate among the cohorts. Implementing a multifaceted OR partnership program based on nursing theory is a strategy for workforce development to increase retention of new graduate OR nurses.
Subject(s)
Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate/organization & administration , Hospitals, Teaching/organization & administration , Interinstitutional Relations , Nursing Staff, Hospital/education , Operating Room Nursing/education , Operating Room Nursing/organization & administration , Societies, Nursing/organization & administration , Workforce/organization & administration , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Organizational Objectives , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We explore if there are ways to characterize health systems-not already revealed by secondary data-that could provide new insights into differences in health system performance. We sought to collect rich qualitative data to reveal whether and to what extent health systems vary in important ways across dimensions of structural, functional, and clinical integration. DATA SOURCES: Interviews with 162 c-suite executives of 24 health systems in four states conducted through "virtual" site visits between 2017 and 2019. STUDY DESIGN: Exploratory study using thematic comparative analysis to describe factors that may lead to high performance. DATA COLLECTION: We used maximum variation sampling to achieve diversity in size and performance. We conducted, transcribed, coded, and analyzed in-depth, semi-structured interviews with system executives, covering such topics as market context, health system origin, organizational structure, governance features, and relationship of health system to affiliated hospitals and POs. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Health systems vary widely in size and ownership type, complexity of organization and governance arrangements, and ability to take on risk. Structural, functional, and clinical integration vary across systems, with considerable activity around centralizing business functions, aligning financial incentives with physicians, establishing enterprise-wide EHR, and moving toward single signatory contracting. Executives describe clinical integration as more difficult to achieve, but essential. Studies that treat "health system" as a binary variable may be inappropriately aggregating for analysis health systems of very different types, at different degrees of maturity, and at different stages of structural, functional, and clinical integration. As a result, a "signal" indicating performance may be distorted by the "noise." CONCLUSIONS: Developing ways to account for the complex structures of today's health systems can enhance future efforts to study systems as complex organizations, to assess their performance, and to better understand the effects of payment innovation, care redesign, and other reforms.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Continuity of Patient Care/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/standards , Economic Competition , Efficiency, Organizational , Health Facility Merger/organization & administration , Health Information Systems/organization & administration , Health Services Research , Humans , Interinstitutional Relations , Interviews as Topic , Models, Organizational , Quality of Health Care/standards , United StatesSubject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Holistic Health/ethnology , Mental Health/ethnology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Transients and Migrants/psychology , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Interinstitutional Relations , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Pandemics , Quarantine/psychology , Resilience, Psychological , SARS-CoV-2 , Singapore/epidemiology , Social Support , VolunteersABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Achieving integrated care is a key focus for health systems and has resulted in various structures between and within organisations. The reorganisation of the Irish health system into hospital networks/groups aims to encourage work across hospitals to integrate care. This study evaluated if collective leadership emerged over time through increased interaction and collaboration following the organisation of hospitals into a network. A secondary aim was to elucidate the potential for collective leadership, through understanding the barriers and enablers perceived by participants. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This study employed social network analysis and qualitative interviews. Leaders across the hospital group were invited to participate in an online network survey and interviews (analysed using thematic analysis) at three time points over an 18-month period. FINDINGS: Although there was evidence that some parts of network were beginning to operate collectively, the structures observed were more typical of a hierarchical network. Disruption in the network and uncertainty regarding permanence of the organisational structure had a negative impact on the potential for collective leadership. Yet, progress was evident in terms of establishing building blocks for collective leadership and integration, including developing trust, mutual understanding and creating space for change. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: This study contributes to the literature by reflecting on the mechanisms and initiatives perceived as enabling/inhibiting collective leadership. Based on this research, it is important to communicate a clear and consistent message about the plans for the organisations involved and be clear regarding the roles and expectations for those involved in introducing new approaches to leadership and integration. Honest collaboration, openness and certainty in communication will likely be important in order to help create the contextual conditions to enable collective and system approaches to introduce "stepping stones" to change. These conditions include developing interpersonal relationships between leaders, creating time and space for deep and shared reflection, and enhancing trust among colleagues. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: A key strength of this study is the linking of leadership-as-networks theory with social network methods to investigate collective leadership in practice. This study contributes to the literature by reflecting on the mechanisms and initiatives perceived as enabling/inhibiting collective leadership.
Subject(s)
Hospitals , Interinstitutional Relations , Leadership , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Hospital Administrators/psychology , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Ireland , Qualitative ResearchABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Kaiser Permanente (KP) Mid-Atlantic States has partnered with communities in its service area since 2011 to provide health services to underserved individuals. As part of KP's Community Benefit investment, the Community Ambassador Program places KP advanced-practice clinicians in safety-net clinics to share best practices and to improve access and quality of care. OBJECTIVE: To report program outcomes and disseminate lessons learned. METHODS: Using data from participating clinics, we retrospectively evaluated the program and estimated Community Ambassadors' contributions to clinic capacity, patient access, evidence-based care, and clinical quality measures. Furthermore, we conducted 29 semistructured phone interviews with stakeholders. Questions focused on program benefits, challenges, learning, and sustainability. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2017, Community Ambassadors filled up to 32.8 full-time equivalent positions and conducted 294,436 patient encounters in 19 clinics. In certain years and for subsets of clinics, Community Ambassadors performed above average on 2 high-priority quality measures: Cervical cancer screening for women aged 21 to 64 years and diabetes (blood glucose) control. Interviews with 15 Community Ambassadors, 15 health centers leaders, and 7 KP Mid-Atlantic States staff members revealed that Community Ambassadors improved patient access, clinic capacity, and care quality. Ambassadors also exported KP best practices and supported KP's community relations. Challenges included patient acuity, clinic resources, staff turnover, and long-term sustainability. CONCLUSION: The Community Ambassador Program achieved its goals and had clear benefits, offering a model for large health care systems wanting to collaborate with community-based clinics. Careful planning is needed to ensure that positive results are sustained.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Interinstitutional Relations , Safety-net Providers/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/standards , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Humans , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Preventive Medicine/organization & administration , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Quality of Health Care/standards , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Over the last 12 years, surgeon representatives from the 33 participating hospitals of the Michigan Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons Quality Collaborative (MSTCVS-QC), along with data specialists, surgical and quality improvement (QI) teams, have met at least 4 times a year to improve health-care quality and outcomes of cardiac and general thoracic surgery patients. The MSTCVS-QC nature of interactive learning has allowed all members to examine current data from each site in an unblinded manner for benchmarking, learn from their findings, institute clinically meaningful changes in survival and health-related quality of life, and carefully follow the effects. These meetings have resulted in agreement on various interventions to improve patient selection, periprocedural strategies, and adherence with evidence-based directed medication regimens, Factors contributing to the quality movement across hospitals include statewide-recognized clinicians who are eager to involve themselves in QI initiatives, dedicated health-care professionals at the hospital level, trusting environments in which failure is only a temporary step on the way toward achieving QI goals, real-time analytics of accurate data, and payers who strongly support QI efforts designed to improve outcomes.
Subject(s)
Cooperative Behavior , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Hospital Planning/organization & administration , Interinstitutional Relations , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Quality Indicators, Health Care/organization & administration , Thoracic Surgical Procedures , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Healthcare Disparities/organization & administration , Humans , Medical Errors/prevention & control , Organizational Objectives , Patient Safety , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Thoracic Surgical Procedures/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Young people in New Zealand have high morbidity but low service utilization rates. Dedicated youth services 'Youth One Stop Shops' provide 'wraparound' health and social care. However, little is understood about how staff within these services interact with each other or with external agencies to provide this specialist care. This article reports on volume and type of internal and inter-agency health and social service staff-staff interactions, to better understand elements of potential collaboration in day-to-day practice. An observational, case-study approach was utilized. Four dedicated youth services recorded data over three-month periods about a selected number of high-use clients. Youth service staff recorded all interactions with colleagues within their organization and staff from external services. A large volume of non-patient contact work was revealed, with a high proportion of 'complex/involved' interactions recorded. The range and diversity of external agencies with which youth service staff interacted with to meet the needs of young people was extensive and complex. The focus on 'information sharing' and 'complex/involved' interactions demonstrates a well-coordinated, wraparound service delivery model. Current funding formulae take inadequate account of the volume of non-patient contact work that youth services provide for high-needs young people.
Subject(s)
Cooperative Behavior , Health Services Accessibility , Holistic Health/trends , Interinstitutional Relations , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Primary Health Care , Adolescent , Documentation/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Services Research , Humans , Male , New Zealand , Social Support , Time FactorsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to describe a sustainable free laser tattoo removal clinic for economically disadvantaged adult probationers. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This paper describes the partnerships, methods and challenges/lessons learned from the implementation of a free monthly laser tattoo removal program for adult probationers within a medical school setting in California. FINDINGS: Possible patients are identified via a collaboration with the county's Probation Department. Founded in 2016, this monthly program has provided tattoo removal services to >37 adult patient probationers, many of whom receive follow-up treatments. Clients seek to remove about four blue/black ink tattoos. Since its inception, 23 dermatology residents have volunteered in the program. Challenges to patients' ongoing participation primarily pertain to scheduling issues; strategies for overcoming barriers to participation are provided. No safety concerns have emerged. SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Programs such as this public-private partnership may benefit probationers by eliminating financial barriers associated with tattoo removal. This model supports the training of cohorts of dermatologists seeking community service opportunities related to laser medicine. Others seeking to implement a similar program may also consider expanding treatment days/times to facilitate access for working probationers, providing enrollment options for other health and social services (e.g. public insurance, food stamp programs) and hosting a mobile onsite clinic to address clients' physical and mental health needs. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This paper describes a unique collaboration between law enforcement and a medical school and it may assist other jurisdictions in establishing free tattoo removal programs for the benefit of probationers. The methods described overcome challenges regarding the implementation of this specialized clinical service.
Subject(s)
Interinstitutional Relations , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Prisons/organization & administration , Schools, Medical/organization & administration , Tattooing , California , Humans , Internship and Residency/organization & administration , Lasers , Longitudinal Studies , PovertyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Health care career pipeline training programs are one solution to increasing the number of minority and underrepresented health care providers. The Chicago Cancer Health Equity Collaborative (ChicagoCHEC) Research Fellows Program, a tri-institutional effort between the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC), Northeastern Illinois University (NEIU), and Northwestern University (NU), provides a holistic, 8-week summer research fellowship that facilitates self-reflection, professional development, and exposes and guides the novice undergraduate and postbaccalaureate student toward a health care career inclusive of research and scientific discovery. OBJECTIVES: The number of underrepresented students achieving health care careers is minimal. We outline curriculum development, innovation, lessons learned, and selected outcomes from the first three cohorts of the ChicagoCHEC Research Fellows program. METHODS: A tri-institutional, collaborative curricular team was formed consisting of research faculty and staff at NEIU, UIC and NU. Once accepted, fellows experience a cohort model curriculum with particular emphasis to mindful inclusion of nontraditional students. The ChicagoCHEC Research Fellows Program uses evidence-based mentorship models, group reflection, and extensive program evaluation to continuously improve its program model. CONCLUSIONS: The 48 fellow alumni from the first 3 years reported high satisfaction with the program and will continued to be tracked for academic success. The ChicagoCHEC Research Fellows program will continue to provide academic and professional tools, sponsorship, and mentorship opportunities to underrepresented students as they progress toward health care careers. A program such as the ChicagoCHEC Fellows Program can serve as a useful model for increasing the number of minority researchers in health care careers.
Subject(s)
Health Occupations/education , Minority Groups , Universities/organization & administration , Career Choice , Community-Institutional Relations , Humans , Interinstitutional Relations , Mentors , Program Development , Program EvaluationABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Multisector health care alliances (alliances) are increasingly viewed as playing an important role in improving the health and health care of local populations, in part by disseminating innovative practices, yet alliances face a number of challenges to disseminating these practices beyond a limited set of initial participants. The purpose of this paper is to examine how alliances attempt to disseminate innovative practices and the facilitating and inhibiting factors that alliances confront when trying to do so. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The authors adopted multiple holistic case study design of eight alliances with a maximum variation case selection strategy to reflect a range of structural and geographic characteristics. Semi-structured interviews with staff, leaders and board members were used. FINDINGS: The findings show that dissemination is a multidirectional process that is closely if not inextricably intertwined with capacity- and context-related factors (of the alliance, partnering organizations and target organizations). Thus, standardized approaches to dissemination are likely the exception and not the rule, and highlight the value of existing frameworks as a starting point for conceptualizing the important aspects of dissemination, but they are incomplete in their description of the "on-the-ground" dissemination processes that occur in the context of collaborative organizational forms such as alliances. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Despite a rapidly expanding evidence base to guide clinical and managerial decision making, this knowledge often fails to make its way into routine practice. Consequently, the search for effective strategies to reduce this gap has accelerated in the past decade. This study sheds light on those strategies and the challenges to implementing them.
Subject(s)
Diffusion of Innovation , Organizational Innovation , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Humans , Interinstitutional Relations , Interviews as Topic , Organizational Case StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In 2017, the Centre for Global Health (CGH) at the University of Oslo in collaboration with the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) and the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad) held a meeting to discuss together with leading figures in disease control, research and development the issue of neglected tropical diseases and emerging/re-emerging infectious diseases. This commentary has taken up this discussion and the conclusions drawn at this meeting to make a case for the opportunity the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) provide in highlighting the interconnectedness of factors that are relevant in the successful fight against neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) and emerging infectious diseases (EIDS). MAIN BODY: Despite NTDs being endemic and EIDS being epidemic, in order to prevent both disease groups effectively, it is important to appreciate that they share essential health determining factors, namely: neglect, poverty, a lack of access to clean water and sanitation facilities and an absence of or severely limited provision of healthcare as well as in many cases a zoonotic nature. Instead of looking to "simple disease management" for the answer, the SDGs help to understand the interplay of multiple priority areas and thereby help to promote a more holistic approach to addressing these two disease groups. CONCLUSIONS: Their commonalities mean that the Global Health community should leverage opportunities and efforts in the prevention and elimination of both NTDs and EIDs. Doing so using a One Health approach is considered to offer a "public health best-buy". Concrete solutions are proposed.
Subject(s)
Communicable Disease Control/methods , Communicable Diseases, Emerging , Neglected Diseases , Public Health Practice , Animals , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/epidemiology , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/prevention & control , Congresses as Topic , Global Health , Health Policy , Humans , Interinstitutional Relations , Internationality , Medically Underserved Area , Neglected Diseases/epidemiology , Neglected Diseases/prevention & control , Norway , Poverty , Sanitation , Tropical Medicine , World Health OrganizationABSTRACT
The use of peer intervention schemes is increasingly popular within services for offending groups and there is growing evidence of their benefit for peers delivering the interventions. The current study explores staff and peer experiences of an employment scheme for peer mentors within a community project for young people involved in offending. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with full time staff (n=4) and peer mentors employed on the scheme (n=2). Thematic analysis revealed three themes of "Opportunity and Empowerment", "Supportive Processes" and "Role Definition and Structure". The results suggest that meaningful employment opportunities, with holistic support and processes for reflection and mentalisation of self and others, contribute to the personal and professional development of ex-offenders in peer mentoring roles.
Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Criminals/psychology , Mental Health Services , Mentors/psychology , Peer Group , Social Support , Adolescent , Adult , Community-Based Participatory Research , Employment , Health Personnel/psychology , Humans , Interinstitutional Relations , Interviews as Topic , Pilot Projects , Qualitative Research , United Kingdom , Young AdultABSTRACT
Schools of Public Health have a commitment to engage in practice-based research and be involved in collaborative partnerships. In 2016 the faculty, staff, and students from the University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Public Health and the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Behavioral Health collaborated to develop and administer a comprehensive assessment of the mental health and substance use disorder services provided by the Division of Behavioral Health. The purpose of this paper is to describe the process used to develop the trusting and mutually beneficial partnership and the data tools that were created and used to assess and determine the behavioral health needs. It is unrealistic to think that practitioners could undertake a project of this magnitude on their own. It is essential to have identified processes and systems in place for others to follow.
Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers/organization & administration , Interinstitutional Relations , Mental Health , Needs Assessment/organization & administration , State Government , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Cost of Illness , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Focus Groups , Humans , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Health/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Nebraska/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Hong Kong experiences a progressive rise in the prevalence of treated end-stage renal disease (ESRD) as recorded by the Hong Kong Renal Registry managed by the Hospital Authority (HA) that takes care of 90 - 95% of the ESRD burden. The CKD burden is envisaged to be high, as reflected by 2 initiatives - SHARE which detected a high prevalence of urine or blood pressure abnormalities among 1,201 asymptomatic individuals who underwent screening, and RISKS that aimed to further characterize the spread of CKD in the asymptomatic population. For CKD prevention, two statutory bodies - the HA and Hong Kong College of Physicians (HKCP), and two non-governmental organizations - Hong Kong Society of Nephrology (HKSN) and Hong Kong Kidney Foundation (HKKF), all have a role to play. The Central Renal Committee (CRC) operated under HA co-produces with HKCP and HKSN a clinical practice guideline for the provision of renal service in Hong Kong which includes CKD care and prevention. HKSN now holds annual educational symposia and a Continuous Medical Education (CME) course in partnership with the HKCP and Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology in addition to its Annual Scientific Meeting. The HKSN also provides a collective International Society of Nephrology (ISN) membership for all its full members to enhance education and other pertinent initiatives. For public education, the HKSN and HKKF participate in the annual World Kidney Day event and organize free blood pressure and CKD surveys in public housing estates to increase public awareness of CKD. The latter is also effected via regular promotion through the mass media.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Preventive Health Services/organization & administration , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/prevention & control , Government Regulation , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Interinstitutional Relations , Prevalence , Private Sector/organization & administration , Public-Private Sector Partnerships/organization & administration , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diagnosis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
AIMS: To assess whether an integrated hospital-community diabetes management program could improve major cardiovascular risk factor control among patients with diabetes in real-world clinical settings. METHODS: 985 adults with diabetes in the Shanghai Taopu community health service center were enrolled at baseline and 907 subjects completed the follow-up. The follow-up levels of the metabolic profiles were assessed by their averages during the follow up period. RESULTS: After a mean 7-year follow-up period, heamoglobin A1c, systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels decreased by 0.6%, 5.7mmHg, and 1.5mmHg, respectively (all P<0.001). There was a non-significant difference in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, while high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased 1.9mg/dL and triglycerides decreased 28.3mg/dL, respectively (all P<0.001). The percentage of patients with diabetes who met any one of three Chinese Diabetes Society goals (heamoglobin A1c <7.0%, blood pressure <140/80mmHg, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100mg/dL) increased from 58.2% to 70.1%. The chronic diabetes complication screening rates (diabetic retinopathy, diabetic neuropathy, diabetic nephropathy) have significantly increased, from almost zero to 12-78%. CONCLUSIONS: This long-term program has increased the proportions of attaining major cardiovascular risk factors control goals and diabetic chronic complication screening rates among patients with diabetes.
Subject(s)
Community Health Services/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Quality Improvement , Adult , Aged , China , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Disease Management , Female , Humans , Interinstitutional Relations , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Program Evaluation , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Developing high-quality and culturally responsive maternal and infant health services is a critical part of 'closing the gap' in health disparities between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and other Australians. The National Maternity Services Plan led work that describes and recommends Birthing on Country best-practice maternity care adaptable from urban to very remote settings, yet few examples exist in Australia. This paper demonstrates Birthing on Country principles can be applied in the urban setting, presenting our experience establishing and developing a Birthing on Country partnership service model in Brisbane, Australia. An initial World Café workshop effectively engaged stakeholders, consumers and community members in service planning, resulting in a multiagency partnership program between a large inner city hospital and two local Aboriginal Community-Controlled Health Services (ACCHS). The Birthing in Our Community program includes: 24/7 midwifery care in pregnancy to six weeks postnatal by a named midwife, supported by Indigenous health workers and a team coordinator; partnership with the ACCHS; oversight from a steering committee, including Indigenous governance; clinical and cultural supervision; monthly cultural education days; and support for Indigenous student midwives through cadetships and placement within the partnership. Three years in, the partnership program is proving successful with clients, as well as showing early signs of improved maternal and infant health outcomes.
Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Health Services, Indigenous/organization & administration , Interinstitutional Relations , Interprofessional Relations , Maternal Health Services/organization & administration , Cultural Competency , Female , Health Status Disparities , Humans , Midwifery , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Pregnancy , Program Development , Program Evaluation , Queensland , Stakeholder Participation , Urban PopulationABSTRACT
Population-level assessment and planning has traditionally been the role of public health departments but in establishing Primary Health Networks (PHNs), the Australian Government has instituted a new mechanism for identifying community needs and commissioning services to meet those needs. If PHNs are to achieve the vision of nimble organisations capable of identifying and addressing local health needs via integrated health and social services, several things need to occur. First, PHN funding schedules must become more flexible. Second, the Federal health department must maintain an open dialogue with PHNs, permit waivers in funding schedules to suit local conditions and be prepared to back innovations with seed investment. Third, health data exchange and linkage must be accelerated to better inform community needs assessments and commissioning. Finally, PHNs must be encouraged and supported to develop collaborations both within and outside the health sector in order to identify and address a broad set of health issues and determinants. By following these principles, PHNs may become leading change agents in the Australian healthcare system.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/methods , Australia , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/methods , Federal Government , Health Priorities , Humans , Interinstitutional Relations , Interprofessional Relations , Needs Assessment , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Public Health PracticeABSTRACT
The present study aims to describe the evolution of an intervention, using a methodology that adopts the critical event as the unit of analysis, and to identify strategic factors that facilitate the continuation of the interventions. Six critical events were identified: dispute care models for health; area of advice: dispute field; change policy; break of interorganizational relations; lack of physical structure and turnover of staff; difficulty in organizing practices in the work process. these are developed into strategic factors: enabling network of allies; meetings and educational activities/building capacity; benefits perceived by community members; mobilization of key actors; intervention's compatibility with the government's vision; restoration of interrelationship; and stability of the workforce. These strategic factors form a group of interrelated conditions that provide the strengthened linkages between elements in the intervention, supporting the hypothesis that they collaborate for the sustainability of the interventions in health. Tracking down the transformations of an intervention set by the critical events, it was verified that these factors performed a protective role at times of changes in the intervention process.