ABSTRACT
The aim was to investigate the preventive effect of a complex training program based on holistic hamstring health understanding in elite professional soccer players. This study involved an elite club in Europe and was conducted over 12 seasons. The last 2 seasons were the intervention period, and the others were the control seasons. During the intervention period, players performed a complex program organized into different interventions throughout the week having as a priority the player health. Hamstring injuries, absenteeism, injury rates, and injury burden between the control and intervention seasons were compared using a rate ratio (RR) with 95% CI. Players had a mean exposure of 333.5 ± 18.6 hours per season with no significant differences between the intervention and control seasons. The overall injury rate was 3 times lower during the two intervention seasons than during the previous seasons (P < .01); the match injury rate was 2.7 times lower (P < .01) and the training rate 4.3 times (P < .01). Injury burden was almost 4 times lower during the two intervention seasons than during the previous seasons (P < .01), and recurrences in the control group were 10% vs 0% in the intervention group. Hamstring injuries were reduced ~3 times during the seasons in which elite football players were exposed to multicomponent, complex prevention training with individual approaches based on player needs, management of training load, individualized physiotherapy treatment, and planned staff communication, in comparison to the control seasons without a clearly defined and structured injury prevention intervention.
Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/prevention & control , Exercise/physiology , Hamstring Muscles/injuries , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Resistance Training/methods , Soccer/injuries , Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Europe/epidemiology , Humans , Leg Injuries/epidemiology , MaleABSTRACT
Context: College soccer players suffer from hamstring injuries due to inflexibility and repetitive motions involving intense hamstring lengthening and contraction during sport. Although it is a popular intervention for muscular injury, there exists limited evidence of the effects of therapeutic cupping on hamstring flexibility. Objective: To determine the effect of cupping therapy on hamstring flexibility in college soccer players. Design: Cohort design. Setting: Athletic training clinic. Patients: A total of 25, asymptomatic, National Collegiate Athletic Association Division III soccer players (10 males and 15 females; age = 19.4 [1.30] y, height = 175.1 [8.2] cm, and mass = 69.5 [6.6] kg). Intervention(s): A 7-minute therapeutic cupping treatment was delivered to the treatment group. Four 2-in cups were fixed atop trigger point locations within the hamstring muscle bellies of participants' dominant legs. Control group participants received no intervention between pretest and posttest measurements. Main Outcome Measures: Pretest and posttest measurements of hamstring flexibility, using a passive straight leg raise, were performed on both groups. Passive straight leg raise measurements were conducted by blinded examiners using a digital inclinometer. An independent samples t test was used to analyze changes in hamstring flexibility from pretreatment to posttreatment with P values set a priori at .05. Results: An independent samples t test demonstrated no significant difference in change in hamstring flexibility between participants in the treatment group and those in the control group (t23 = -.961, P = .35). Conclusions: The findings of this study demonstrated no statistically significant changes in hamstring flexibility following a cupping treatment.
Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies , Elasticity , Hamstring Muscles/physiology , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Adolescent , Female , Humans , Male , Muscle, Skeletal/injuries , Soccer , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hamstring injuries are among the most common non-contact injuries in sports. The Nordic hamstring (NH) exercise has been shown to decrease risk by increasing eccentric hamstring strength. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the effectiveness of the injury prevention programs that included the NH exercise on reducing hamstring injury rates while factoring in athlete workload. METHODS: Two researchers independently searched for eligible studies using the following databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials via OvidSP, AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine) via OvidSP, EMBASE, PubMed, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, CINAHL and AusSportMed, from inception to December 2015. The keyword domains used during the search were Nordic, hamstring, injury prevention programs, sports and variations of these keywords. The initial search resulted in 3242 articles which were filtered to five articles that met the inclusion criteria. The main inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials or interventional studies on use of an injury prevention program that included the NH exercise while the primary outcome was hamstring injury rate. Extracted data were subjected to meta-analysis using a random effects model. RESULTS: The pooled results based on total injuries per 1000 h of exposure showed that programs that included the NH exercise had a statistically significant reduction in hamstring injury risk ratio [IRR] of 0.490 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.291-0.827, p = 0.008). Teams using injury prevention programs that included the NH exercise reduced hamstring injury rates up to 51 % in the long term compared with the teams that did not use any injury prevention measures. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that injury prevention programs that include NH exercises decrease the risk of hamstring injuries among soccer players. A protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, PROSPERO (CRD42015019912).
Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/prevention & control , Exercise/physiology , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Soccer/injuries , Exercise Therapy/methods , Humans , Muscle, Skeletal/injuries , Soft Tissue Injuries/prevention & controlABSTRACT
Overuse injuries of the leg are a common problem for young soldiers. This article reviews the literature concerning the prevention and treatment of exercise related leg pain in military settings and presents the latest developments in proposed mechanisms and treatments. Current practice and treatment protocols from the Dutch Armed Forces are reviewed, with an emphasis on the most prevalent conditions of medial tibial stress syndrome and chronic exertional compartment syndrome. The conclusion is that exercise related leg pain in the military is an occupational problem that deserves further study.
Subject(s)
Anterior Compartment Syndrome/prevention & control , Cumulative Trauma Disorders/prevention & control , Exercise , Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome/prevention & control , Military Medicine , Military Personnel , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Anterior Compartment Syndrome/therapy , Cumulative Trauma Disorders/therapy , Humans , Leg , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Leg Injuries/therapy , Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome/therapy , Musculoskeletal Pain/prevention & control , Musculoskeletal Pain/therapy , Netherlands , Occupational Diseases/therapy , Pain/prevention & control , Physical ExertionABSTRACT
We performed a placebo-controlled pre-clinical study to determine if sodium 4-phenylbutyrate (4PB) can reduce contraction-induced myofiber damage in the mdx mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). At 72 h post-eccentric contractions, 4PB significantly increased contractile torque and reduced myofiber damage and macrophage infiltration. We conclude that 4PB, which is approved by Health Canada (Pheburane) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (Buphenyl) for urea cycle disorders, might modify disease severity in patients with DMD.
Subject(s)
Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Macrophage Activation/drug effects , Muscle, Skeletal/drug effects , Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne/drug therapy , Musculoskeletal Manipulations/adverse effects , Myofibrils/drug effects , Phenylbutyrates/therapeutic use , Animals , Hindlimb , Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Injections, Intraperitoneal , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Male , Mice, Inbred mdx , Muscle Contraction/drug effects , Muscle, Skeletal/immunology , Muscle, Skeletal/injuries , Muscle, Skeletal/pathology , Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne/immunology , Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne/pathology , Myofibrils/immunology , Myofibrils/pathology , Phenylbutyrates/administration & dosage , TorqueABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Martial arts such as judo, taekwondo and wrestling are regulated, usually athletic duels. The aim is to score better than your opponent or to win. As with any type of sport, athletes in martial arts sustain minor and major injuries, which may have many negative consequences. In addition, sports injuries and their rehabilitation generate high costs to the healthcare system. In contrast to the FIFA 11+ warm-up program, no preventive programs have been postulated for injury prevention in these martial arts. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to summarise the latest research findings and to evaluate whether initial recommendations can be given for the reduction of injuries in the martial arts judo, wrestling and taekwondo. METHODS: To gain an overview of the latest research findings, we searched for systematic reviews in PEDro, PubMed, Cochrane and the internet search engine Google Scholar. The methodological quality of these reviews was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Tool for a Systematic Review (CASP), and data was extracted on the risk of injury, injury location and injury type. RESULTS: It was found that all three review articles are of low to moderate methodological quality. Regarding injury location, it became evident that the extremities are particularly vulnerable to injury in all three martial arts. Effusion was observed to be the most common type of injury. CONCLUSION: Due to the moderate methodological quality and the injury type of effusion, it is not possible to formulate recommendations for injury prevention. Moreover, uniform definitions should be developed to describe sports injuries.
Subject(s)
Arm Injuries/epidemiology , Joint Dislocations/epidemiology , Leg Injuries/epidemiology , Martial Arts/injuries , Multiple Trauma/epidemiology , Wrestling/injuries , Arm Injuries/diagnosis , Arm Injuries/prevention & control , Comorbidity , Humans , Incidence , Joint Dislocations/diagnosis , Joint Dislocations/prevention & control , Leg Injuries/diagnosis , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Multiple Trauma/diagnosis , Multiple Trauma/prevention & control , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: This survey suggests that patients are prepared to accept higher absolute fracture risk than doctors, before considering pharmacological therapy to be justified. Patients require that drug treatments confer substantial fracture risk reductions in order to consider long-term therapy. INTRODUCTION: Absolute fracture risk estimates are now incorporated into osteoporosis treatment guidelines. At present, little is known about how patients regard fracture risk and its management. We set out to describe and compare the views of patients and doctors on the level of fracture risk at which drug treatment is justified. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on 114 patients referred for bone density measurement and 161 doctors whose practice includes management of osteoporosis. Participants were asked about fracture risk thresholds for pharmacological intervention. RESULTS: The absolute risk of both major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture at which drug treatment was considered by patients to be justifiable was higher than that reported by doctors [major osteoporotic fracture, median (interquartile range): patients, 50% (25 to 60); doctors, 10% (10 to 20); P < 0.0001; hip fracture: patients, 50% (25 to 60); doctors, 10% (5 to 20); P < 0.0001]. Patients required that a drug provide a median 50% reduction in relative risk of fracture in order to consider taking long-term therapy, irrespective of the treatment mode or dosing schedule. Among doctors, there was an inverse relationship between the number of osteoporosis consultations conducted each month and threshold of risk for recommending drug treatment (r = -0.22 and r = -0.29 for major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture, respectively, P < 0.01 for both) CONCLUSIONS: Patients are prepared to accept higher absolute fracture risk than doctors, before considering pharmacological therapy to be justified. Patients require that drug treatments confer substantial fracture risk reductions in order to consider long-term therapy.
Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Hip Fractures/prevention & control , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Arm Injuries/prevention & control , Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Calcium/administration & dosage , Cross-Sectional Studies , Denosumab , Dietary Supplements , Diphosphonates/administration & dosage , Female , Hip Fractures/drug therapy , Humans , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoporotic Fractures/drug therapy , Pelvic Bones/injuries , Risk Assessment , Shoulder Fractures/prevention & control , Spinal Fractures/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires , Teriparatide/administration & dosage , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Shock-absorbing and biomechanic shoe orthoses are frequently used in the prevention and treatment of back and lower extremity problems. One review concludes that the former is clinically effective in relation to prevention, whereas the latter has been tested in only 1 randomized clinical trial, concluding that stress fractures could be prevented. OBJECTIVES: To investigate if biomechanic shoe orthoses can prevent problems in the back and lower extremities and if reducing the number of days off-duty because of back or lower extremity problems is possible. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled intervention trial. STUDY SUBJECTS: One female and 145 male military conscripts (aged 18 to 24 years), representing 25% of all new conscripts in a Danish regiment. METHOD: Health data were collected by questionnaires at initiation of the study and 3 months later. Custom-made biomechanic shoe orthoses to be worn in military boots were provided to all in the study group during the 3-month intervention period. No intervention was provided for the control group. Differences between the 2 groups were tested with the chi-square test, and statistical significance was accepted at P <.05. Risk ratio (RR), risk difference (ARR), numbers needed to prevent (NNP), and cost per successfully prevented case were calculated. OUTCOME VARIABLES: Outcome variables included self-reported back and/or lower extremity problems; specific problems in the back or knees or shin splints, Achilles tendonitis, sprained ankle, or other problems in the lower extremity; number of subjects with at least 1 day off-duty because of back or lower extremity problems and total number of days off-duty within the first 3 months of military service because of back or lower extremity problems. RESULTS: Results were significantly better in an actual-use analysis in the intervention group for total number of subjects with back or lower extremity problems (RR 0.7, ARR 19%, NNP 5, cost 98 US dollars); number of subjects with shin splints (RR 0.2, ARR 19%, NNP 5, cost 101 US dollars); number of off-duty days because of back or lower extremity problems (RR 0.6, ARR < 1%, NNP 200, cost 3750 US dollars). In an intention-to-treat analysis, a significant difference was found for only number of subjects with shin splints (RR 0.3, ARR 18%, NNP 6 cost 105 US dollars), whereas a worst-case analysis revealed no significant differences between the study groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that it may be possible to prevent certain musculoskeletal problems in the back or lower extremities among military conscripts by using custom-made biomechanic shoe orthoses. However, because care-seeking for lower extremity problems is rare, using this method of prevention in military conscripts would be too costly. We also noted that the choice of statistical approach determined the outcome.
Subject(s)
Back Pain/prevention & control , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Military Personnel , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Orthotic Devices , Shoes , Adolescent , Adult , Athletic Injuries/prevention & control , Back Pain/economics , Denmark , Female , Health Care Costs , Humans , Leg Injuries/economics , Male , Occupational Diseases/economics , Sick Leave , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To document the injury rate in three British Shotokan karate championships in consecutive years. In these tournaments strict rules governed contact, with only "light" or "touch" contact allowed. Protective padding for the head, hands, or feet was prohibited. METHODS: Prospective recording of injuries resulting from 1770 bouts in three national competitions of 1996, 1997, and 1998. Details of ages and years of karate experience were also obtained. RESULTS: 160 injuries were sustained in 1770 bouts. The overall rate of injury was 0.09 per bout and 0.13 per competitor. 91 (57%) injuries were to the head. The average age of those injured was 22 years, with an average of nine years of experience in karate. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of protective padding does not result in higher injury rates than in most other series of Shotokan karate injuries. Strict refereeing is essential, however, to maintain control and minimise contact.
Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Craniocerebral Trauma/epidemiology , Fractures, Bone/epidemiology , Leg Injuries/epidemiology , Martial Arts/injuries , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Athletic Injuries/prevention & control , Child , Contusions/epidemiology , Contusions/prevention & control , Craniocerebral Trauma/prevention & control , Data Collection , Facial Injuries/epidemiology , Facial Injuries/prevention & control , Female , Fractures, Bone/prevention & control , Humans , Incidence , Joint Dislocations/epidemiology , Joint Dislocations/prevention & control , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Male , Prospective Studies , Protective Devices , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , Sports Equipment , United Kingdom/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Ascorbic acid intake of sixty-seven patients with myelomeningocele, ages one through eight years, was evaluated in two groups, fracture and non-fracture, to compare their intake of ascorbic acid from food-plus-supplement, food-only, and supplement-only with the recommended allowances. Intake from food-plus-supplement exceeded the allowance for 90 per cent of the fracture and 83 per cent of the non-fractured patients. Intake from food-only exceeded the recommended allowance in 79 per cent of the fracture and 75 per cent of the non-fracture subjects. All supplementations exceeded 100 per cent of the recommended allowance. There was no significant difference in the ascorbic acid intakes of fracture and non-fracture patients. Since there was no apparent correlation between fractures and ascorbic acid intake, we do not recommend ascorbic acid supplementation to prevent fractures. If such high levels are suggested, the potentially harmful effects of excessive ascorbic acid in growing children must be carefully considered.