Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 16(6): e0253689, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34166428

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A high prevalence of suboptimal serum vitamin D has been reported among HIV infected children even in countries with high sunshine abundance throughout the year. Vitamin D is a potent immune modulator of innate and adaptive immune responses. Vitamin D regulates immune responses through the vitamin D receptor on CD4 cells. We aimed to determine the vitamin D status of HIV infected children and factors associated with suboptimal vitamin D. METHODS: This was a cross sectional study. We enrolled children aged between 6 months and 12 years attending an outpatient paediatric HIV clinic. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) was measured using the electrochemoluminisence method. Suboptimal vitamin D was defined as 25(OH)D <30 ng/ml, vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency were 21-29 ng/ml and <20 ng/ml respectively. Anthropometry, physical exam and medical history were documented. Logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: We enrolled 376 children with mean age (sd) 8.05 years (3.03), a median (IQR) duration of ART of 5.9 years (3.2-8.4). Majority of the children (64%) had been exposed to non nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs). A third were severely immunosuppressed (CD4% ≤15%) at ART initiation. At the time of the study, the majority (89%) were virologically suppressed (VL <1000 copies/ml). Prevalence of 25(OH)D <30 ng/ml was 49 (13%) of 375 participants and 11 (3%) had 25(OH)D <20 ng/ml. Lopinavir/ritonavir regimen was independently associated with 25(OH)D <30 ng/ml; OR 0.27 CI (0.13-0.57), p value-0.002. Serum 25(OH)D <20 ng/ml was associated with CD4 count ≤15% at ART initiation OR 6.55(1.30-32.9), p value-0.023 and use of NNRTIs; OR 10.9(1.22-96.2), p value-0.03. CONCLUSION: We found a low prevalence of suboptimal vitamin D compared to earlier reports. Severe immunosuppression at ART initiation and use of NNRTIs increases odds of deficiency. Vitamin D supplementation should be considered in severely immunosuppressed children initiating ART.


Subject(s)
Calcifediol/blood , HIV Infections , HIV-1/metabolism , Lopinavir/administration & dosage , Ritonavir/administration & dosage , Vitamin D Deficiency , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , HIV Infections/blood , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Male , Uganda/epidemiology , Vitamin D Deficiency/blood , Vitamin D Deficiency/drug therapy , Vitamin D Deficiency/epidemiology
2.
Reumatismo ; 72(3): 173-177, 2020 Nov 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33213130

ABSTRACT

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has involved more than 159 countries and more than 5 million people worldwide. A 40-year-old man with a history of rheumatoid arthritis treated with prednisolone, Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs), and biologic agents was admitted with chief complaints of fever, chills, malaise, myalgia, and dyspnea. Chest computed tomography showed bilateral subsegmental atelectasis and diffuse ground-glass opacities in both lungs inducing the suspicion of COVID-19 infection. The oro-nasopharynx swab sample for COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction was positive. In addition to supportive care, lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg twice daily and oseltamivir (75 mg) twice daily were started in combination with a starting dose of hydroxychloroquine (400 mg). The methotrexate dose was decreased, and the dose of prednisolone was increased to 30 mg for 10 days. Azathioprine and adalimumab were continued at previous doses. The use of biologic agents and DMARDs in rheumatic patients is a serious challenge in the COVID-19 pandemic. In conclusion, during the COVID-19 pandemic, due to the key roles of cytokines in the promotion of the disease, the rheumatic patients may benefit from continuing their previous treatment, which may have protective effects.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/administration & dosage , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Adalimumab/administration & dosage , Adult , Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , Azathioprine/administration & dosage , Biological Therapy , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Drug Combinations , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Humans , Lopinavir/administration & dosage , Male , Methotrexate/administration & dosage , Oseltamivir/administration & dosage , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Prednisolone/administration & dosage , Ritonavir/administration & dosage , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Biomed Pharmacother ; 129: 110500, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32768975

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)2 has emerged as a global pandemic. However, as effective treatments for this disease are still unclear, safe and efficient therapies are urgently needed. Qingfei Paidu decoction (QPD)3 is strongly recommended in the Chinese Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia Diagnosis and Treatment Plan (Provisional 6th Edition). However, clinical research data on the effects of QPD on COVID-19 are scarce. Our study aimed to explore the effects of combined treatment with QPD and Western medicine on COVID-19. METHODS: In this study, 63 patients with confirmed COVID-19 were analyzed. During the first 14 days of hospitalization, patients with deteriorating symptoms were administered QPD along with Western medicine therapy (the antiviral medicine selected from interferon, lopinavir, or arbidol). The clinical characteristics and blood laboratory indices (blood routine, inflammatory factors, and multi-organ biochemical indices) were examined, and the total lung severity scores were evaluated in each patient by reviewing chest computed tomography before treatment and at the end of treatment. RESULTS: Before QPD treatment, the combined treatment group showed higher blood C-reactive protein levels and more severe pulmonary inflammation and clinical symptoms than the Western medicine treatment group. Both groups met the discharge criteria after a similar length of hospitalization. At the end of treatment, circulating white blood cells, total lymphocyte count, and glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase levels improved dramatically in both groups (P <  0.05). In contrast, C-reactive protein, creatine kinase, creatine kinase-myocardial band, lactate dehydrogenase, and blood urea nitrogen levels were improved only in the combined treatment group (P <  0.05), and C-reactive protein and creatine kinase were the most pronounced (P <  0.01). Compared with baseline, at the end of treatment, the proportion of patients with normal values of C-reactive protein, total lymphocyte count, and lactate dehydrogenase were increased in the combined treatment group (P < 0.05), whereas no significant difference was observed in the Western medicine treatment group (P >  0.05). CONCLUSION: The combination of QPD with Western medicine demonstrated significant anti-inflammatory effects compared with those of only Western medicine in patients with mild and moderate COVID-19; however, neither mortality nor length of hospitalization was affected. Moreover, the combined treatment tended to mitigate the extent of multi-organ impairment. Long-term randomized controlled trials with follow-up evaluations are required to confirm the results presented here.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Drugs, Chinese Herbal/administration & dosage , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Indoles/administration & dosage , Interferons/administration & dosage , Length of Stay , Lopinavir/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Organ Failure/virology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
4.
Chin J Integr Med ; 26(9): 648-655, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32676976

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To develop a new Chinese medicine (CM)-based drug and to evaluate its safety and effect for suppressing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: A putative ARDS-suppressing drug Keguan-1 was first developed and then evaluated by a randomized, controlled two-arm trial. The two arms of the trial consist of a control therapy (alpha interferon inhalation, 50 µg twice daily; and lopinavir/ritonavir, 400 and 100 mg twice daily, respectively) and a testing therapy (control therapy plus Keguan-1 19.4 g twice daily) by random number table at 1:1 ratio with 24 cases each group. After 2-week treatment, adverse events, time to fever resolution, ARDS development, and lung injury on newly diagnosed COVID-19 patients were assessed. RESULTS: An analysis of the data from the first 30 participants showed that the control arm and the testing arm did not exhibit any significant differences in terms of adverse events. Based on this result, the study was expanded to include a total of 48 participants (24 cases each arm). The results show that compared with the control arm, the testing arm exhibited a significant improvement in time to fever resolution (P=0.035), and a significant reduction in the development of ARDS (P=0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Keguan-1-based integrative therapy was safe and superior to the standard therapy in suppressing the development of ARDS in COVID-19 patients. (Trial registration No. NCT04251871 at www.clinicaltrials.gov ).


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Drugs, Chinese Herbal/administration & dosage , Interferon-alpha/administration & dosage , Lopinavir/administration & dosage , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/drug therapy , Administration, Inhalation , Adult , COVID-19 , China , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Integrative Medicine , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Risk Assessment , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/diagnosis , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/mortality , Severity of Illness Index , Survival Rate
5.
Cell Host Microbe ; 28(3): 455-464.e2, 2020 09 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32707096

ABSTRACT

Interferons (IFNs) are widely used in treating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. However, a recent report of ACE2, the host factor mediating SARS-Cov-2 infection, identifying it as interferon-stimulated raised considerable safety concern. To examine the association between the use and timing of IFN-α2b and clinical outcomes, we analyzed in a retrospective multicenter cohort study of 446 COVID-19 patients in Hubei, China. Regression models estimated that early administration (≤5 days after admission) of IFN-α2b was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality in comparison with no admission of IFN-α2b, whereas late administration of IFN-α2b was associated with increased mortality. Among survivors, early IFN-α2b was not associated with hospital discharge or computed tomography (CT) scan improvement, whereas late IFN-α2b was associated with delayed recovery. Additionally, early IFN-α2b and umifenovir alone or together were associated with reduced mortality and accelerated recovery in comparison with treatment with lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) alone. We concluded that administration of IFN-α2b during the early stage of COVID-19 could induce favorable clinical responses.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Interferon-alpha/therapeutic use , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 , Child , China/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Hospital Mortality , Host Microbial Interactions/drug effects , Humans , Indoles/administration & dosage , Interferon alpha-2 , Interferon-alpha/administration & dosage , Length of Stay , Lopinavir/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Ritonavir/administration & dosage , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
6.
Trials ; 21(1): 489, 2020 Jun 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32503620

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Colchicine is a well-known drug, which has been used for years to treat a wide range of rheumatic and inflammatory disorders. It helps break the cycle of inflammation through diverse mechanisms including reducing Intereukin-6, Interleukin-8, Tumour Necrosis Factor-alpha besides controlling oxidative stress pathways which all are important and pathologic components in the clinical course and outcome of patients infected with COVID-19. This study aims to assess the anti-inflammatory effects of colchicine in non-severe hospitalized COVID-19 patients. TRIAL DESIGN: Prospective, randomized (1:1 ratio), double blind study with parallel group design. PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalized patients with positive nasopharyngeal swab for COVID-19 infection (RT -PCR) and lung Computed tomography scan involvement compatible with COVID-19 pneumonia. The patients are not severely hypoxic, do not need intubation or invasive oxygenation. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: known hypersensitivity to colchicine; known hepatic failure; estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)<30 ml/min/1.73m2 (by the CKD-EPI Creatinine Equation for Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) which estimates GFR based on serum creatinine. ; kidney transplant recipients, using Digoxin, QTc >450 msec. Participants will be recruited from inpatients at Labbafinejad Meidcal Center , Tehran, Iran. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: Eligible enrolled patients will be randomized into two groups. Group A will receive the antiretroviral Lopinavir/Ritonavir (Kaletra) while group B will receive Lopinavir/Ritonavir (Kaletra) + Colchicine 1.5 mg loading then 0.5 mg twice daily orally. All patients in both groups will receive the same amounts of essential minerals, vitamins as antioxidants, and antibiotics. Patients of both groups will be treated under optimal treatment based on the CDC and WHO guidelines and national consensus proposed in Iran including the same dosages of Lopinavir/Ritonavir, antibiotics, trace elements and antioxidants while only in group-B patients Colchicine will be added on top of this protocol. MAIN OUTCOMES: Primary: Time for clinical improvement and lung CT score changes 14 days after treatment. Secondary: 14 days after treatment - C-Reactive Protein test x Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio , Interleukin-6, malondialdehyde (MDA) levels reduction - Percentage of patients who require supplemental Oxygen - Mean hospital stay length RANDOMISATION: Patients will be allocated to each group (ratio 1:1) by using an online randomization tool: http://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/index.cfm BLINDING (MASKING): This will be a double-blind study in which participants and those assessing the final outcomes will be blinded to group assignment. NUMBERS TO BE RANDOMISED (SAMPLE SIZE): Regarding the pandemic crisis and our center capacity to hospitalize confirmed COVID-19 patients, a total of 80 patients was found to be logical to be randomized into two groups of 40- patients. TRIAL STATUS: Recruitment is ongoing. Recruitment began on 20/03/2020 and the date by which the recruitment is anticipated to be completed is 30/05/2020. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04360980, registered 24/04/2020. FULL PROTOCOL: The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Colchicine/administration & dosage , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Lopinavir/administration & dosage , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Ritonavir/administration & dosage , COVID-19 , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Hospitalization , Humans , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
7.
J Cell Biochem ; 119(12): 10384-10392, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30187948

ABSTRACT

Most toxicity associated with antiretroviral drugs is thought to result from disruption of mitochondrial function. Unfortunately, there are no validated laboratory markers for clinically assessing the onset of mitochondrial toxicity associated with antiretroviral therapy. In a previous study on mitochondrial hepatocytes, the protease inhibitor lopimune was shown to induce mitochondrial toxicity by increasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and decreasing respiratory control ratio (RCR) reflecting compromised mitochondrial efficiency in adenosine triphosphate production. Mitochondrial dysfunction and ROS production were directly correlated with the expression of uncoupling protein 2 (UCP2). In the current study we aim to determine the toxicity of nucleoside or nucleotide and nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors, Duovir and Viraday on liver mitochondria isolated from treated mice by monitoring UCP2 expression. Our results showed that both Duovir and Viraday had no effect on mitochondrial respiration states 2, 3, 4, and on RCR. In addition, ROS generation and UCP2 expression were not affected. In conclusion, our results indicate the difference in the mechanism of action of distinct classes of antiretroviral drugs on mitochondrial functions and may associate UCP2 expression with subclinical mitochondrial damage as marker of cellular oxidative stress.


Subject(s)
Anti-Retroviral Agents/administration & dosage , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Mitochondria, Liver/drug effects , Mitochondria/drug effects , Adenosine Triphosphate/metabolism , Animals , Drug Combinations , Energy Metabolism , HIV Infections/pathology , HIV Infections/virology , Hepatocytes/drug effects , Hepatocytes/virology , Ion Channels/drug effects , Lopinavir/administration & dosage , Mice , Mitochondria, Liver/virology , Mitochondrial Proteins/genetics , Oxidative Stress , Reactive Oxygen Species/metabolism , Ritonavir/administration & dosage
8.
Indian J Med Microbiol ; 36(4): 513-516, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30880698

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUNDS: This randomised controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial was conducted in antiretroviral-naïve HIV-1-infected patients to assess the efficacy and safety of 48-week dual therapy of LPV/r plus 3TC (DT group) compared with Chinese first-line triple-therapy regimen (TT group). METHODS: 198 were randomised to DT (n = 100) or TT (n = 98). RESULTS: Ninety-two DT patients (92%) and 88 TT patients (89.8%) achieved HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml at week 48 (P = 0.629). Moreover, the safety profile was similar between two groups, and no secondary HIV resistance was observed. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that dual therapy of LPV/r plus 3TC is non-inferior to the first-line triple-therapy regimen in China.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active/methods , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV-1/isolation & purification , Lamivudine/administration & dosage , Lopinavir/administration & dosage , Ritonavir/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-HIV Agents/adverse effects , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active/adverse effects , China , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/pathology , Female , Humans , Lamivudine/adverse effects , Lopinavir/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Ritonavir/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Viral Load , Young Adult
9.
Drug Dev Ind Pharm ; 41(1): 131-40, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24180260

ABSTRACT

Lopinavir (LPV)-loaded poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) nanoparticles (NPs) were prepared by emulsion solvent evaporation technique. Effects of various critical factors in preparation of loaded NPs were investigated. Box-Behnken design (BBD) was employed to optimize particle size and entrapment efficiency (EE) of loaded NPs. Optimized LPV NPs exhibited nanometeric size (195.3 nm) with high EE (93.9%). In vitro drug release study showed bi-phasic sustained release behavior of LPV from NPs. Pharmacokinetic study results in male Wistar rats indicated an increase in oral bioavailability of LPV by 4-folds after incorporation into PCL NPs. From tissue distribution studies, significant accumulation of loaded NPs in tissues like liver and spleen indicated possible involvement of lymphatic route in absorption of NPs. Mechanistic studies using rat everted gut sac model revealed endocytosis as a principal mechanism of NPs uptake. In vitro rat microsomal metabolism studies demonstrated noticeable advantage of LPV NPs by affording metabolic protection to LPV. These studies indicate usefulness of PCL NPs in enhancing oral bioavailability and improving pharmacokinetic profile of LPV.


Subject(s)
Caproates/administration & dosage , Drug Delivery Systems/methods , Drug Design , Lactones/administration & dosage , Lopinavir/administration & dosage , Nanoparticles/administration & dosage , Polymers/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Animals , Caproates/chemistry , Caproates/metabolism , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical/methods , Gastrointestinal Tract/drug effects , Gastrointestinal Tract/metabolism , Lactones/chemistry , Lactones/metabolism , Lopinavir/chemistry , Lopinavir/metabolism , Male , Nanoparticles/chemistry , Nanoparticles/metabolism , Organ Culture Techniques , Polymers/chemistry , Polymers/metabolism , Rats , Rats, Wistar
10.
Int J Infect Dis ; 17(10): e857-61, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23587599

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: African potato (Hypoxis obtusa) is commonly used in Sub-Saharan Africa as a complementary herbal remedy for HIV-infected patients. It is unknown whether or not co-administration of African potato alters the pharmacokinetics of protease inhibitor antiretrovirals. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of the African potato on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r). METHODS: Sixteen adult volunteers were administered LPV/r 400/100 mg twice a day for 14 days, followed by concomitant administration with African potato given once daily for 7 days. Lopinavir plasma exposure as estimated by the area under the concentration-time curve over the 12-h dosing interval (AUC(0-12h), AUCτ) was determined on day 14 and again on day 21. Lopinavir in plasma was analyzed using a validated liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Steady-state AUCτ and the maximum concentration following dose administration (C(max)) were determined using non-compartmental methods using WinNonlin Professional version 5.2.1. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata version 12.1. RESULTS: Co-administration of African potato was not associated with any change in lopinavir AUCτ, C(max), or C(trough). CONCLUSIONS: African potato when taken concomitantly with LPV/r is well-tolerated and not associated with clinically significant changes in lopinavir pharmacokinetics.


Subject(s)
Alkynes/administration & dosage , Anti-HIV Agents/pharmacokinetics , Glucosides/administration & dosage , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Lopinavir/pharmacokinetics , Ritonavir/pharmacokinetics , Adult , Alkynes/pharmacology , Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , Area Under Curve , Cross-Over Studies , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Glucosides/pharmacology , Humans , Lopinavir/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Plant Extracts/administration & dosage , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Ritonavir/administration & dosage , Solanum tuberosum/chemistry , Young Adult
11.
Phytother Res ; 26(10): 1490-5, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22308076

ABSTRACT

Lopinavir (LPV), a newer HIV protease inhibitor, has poor bioavailability being a substrate of both cytochrome P450 3A enzyme system (CYP3A) and permeability-glycoprotein (P-gp). Ritonavir (RTV) is a known inhibitor of both P-gp and CYP3A and is co-administered with LPV in anti-HIV therapy. Grapefruit juice (GFJ) is known to inhibit CYP3A and has conflicting effects, ranging from activation to inhibition, on P-gp. In this research work, the effects of GFJ and RTV on the pharmacokinetics of LPV were compared in rats. A mechanistic evaluation was undertaken using various in vitro and ex vivo studies to support the in vivo pharmacokinetic data. The plasma levels of LPV were found to increase significantly upon co-administration with GFJ in single dose as well as multidose pretreatment studies. Similar, but marginally higher, results were observed upon co-administration of LPV with RTV. No significant change in t(max) was observed in the various treatment groups. The apparent permeability of LPV in the ileum increased significantly after the pre-incubation with GFJ and RTV compared with no pre-incubation. The GFJ and RTV showed a significant and similar inhibitory effect on rat intestinal microsomes in the metabolism of LPV. The GFJ was equally effective as RTV in increasing the bioavailability of LPV.


Subject(s)
Citrus paradisi/chemistry , Food-Drug Interactions , Lopinavir/pharmacokinetics , Ritonavir/chemistry , Animals , Beverages , Drug Synergism , HIV Protease Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Intestinal Absorption , Intestines/drug effects , Lopinavir/administration & dosage , Male , Microsomes/drug effects , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Ritonavir/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL