ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Intrinsic rhythms in host and cancer cells play an imperative role in tumorigenesis and anticancer therapy. Circadian medicine in cancer is principally reliant on the control of growth and development of cancer cells or tissues by targeting the molecular clock and implementing time-of-day-based anticancer treatments for therapeutic improvements. In recent years, based on extensive high-throughput studies, we witnessed the arrival of several drugs and drug-like compounds that can modulate circadian timekeeping for therapeutic gain in cancer management. OBJECTIVE: This perspective article intends to illustrate the current trends in circadian medicine in cancer, focusing on clock-modulating pharmacological compounds and circadian regulation of anticancer drug metabolism and efficacy. Scope and Approach: Considering the critical roles of the circadian clock in metabolism, cell signaling, and apoptosis, chronopharmacology research is exceedingly enlightening for understanding cancer biology and improving anticancer therapeutics. In addition to reviewing the relevant literature, we investigated the rhythmic expression of molecular targets for many anticancer drugs frequently used to treat different cancer types. Key Findings and Conclusion: There are adequate empirical pieces of evidence supporting circadian regulation of drug metabolism, transport, and detoxification. Administration of anticancer drugs at specific dosing times can improve their effectiveness and reduce the toxic effects. Moreover, pharmacological modulators of the circadian clock could be used for targeted anticancer therapeutics such as boosting circadian rhythms in the host can markedly reduce the growth and viability of tumors. All in all, precision chronomedicine can offer multiple advantages over conventional anticancer therapy.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Carcinogenesis , Circadian Clocks , Drug Chronotherapy , Neoplasms , Administration, Metronomic , Apoptosis/drug effects , Apoptosis/physiology , Carcinogenesis/drug effects , Carcinogenesis/metabolism , Chronopharmacokinetics , Circadian Clocks/drug effects , Circadian Clocks/physiology , Circadian Rhythm/drug effects , Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Humans , Maintenance Chemotherapy/methods , Maintenance Chemotherapy/trends , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/metabolism , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Signal Transduction/physiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We compared the clinical efficacies of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) vs. sorafenib as sequential maintenance therapy following liver-directed concurrent chemoradiotherapy (LD-CCRT) for locally advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Patients undergoing HAIC with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (HAIC-maintain group, n = 151) or sorafenib (Sorafenib-maintain group, n = 37) after LD-CCRT were consecutively enrolled. The study endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment response rates. RESULTS: The median OS among HAIC-maintain and Sorafenib-maintain groups were 15.9 and 24.3 months (p = 0.287), whereas the median PFS were 8.1 and 9.1 months (p = 0.651), respectively. During the planned treatments, the radiological objective response rate (54.3% vs. 64.9%; p = 0.246), and conversion rate to surgical resection or liver transplantation after successful down-staging (15.9% vs. 18.9%; p = 0.657) were comparable between the HAIC-maintain and Sorafenib-maintain groups. Similar results were found after the inverse probability of treatment weighting and propensity score-matching analyses. Regarding treatment-related adverse events, the HAIC-maintain group showed worse profiles in terms of leukopenia (all grades [p = 0.001] and grades 3 or 4 [p = 0.041]) and hypoalbuminemia (p = 0.001) than the Sorafenib-maintain group. CONCLUSIONS: The overall clinical efficacies between the sequential treatment of HAIC vs. sorafenib after LD-CCRT were comparable for locally advanced HCC.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology , Chemoradiotherapy/mortality , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Maintenance Chemotherapy/mortality , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infusions, Intra-Arterial , Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Sorafenib/administration & dosage , Survival RateABSTRACT
The unraveling of the pathophysiology of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has resulted in rapid translation of the information into clinical practice. After more than 40 years of slow progress in AML research, the US Food and Drug Administration has approved nine agents for different AML treatment indications since 2017. In this review, we detail the progress that has been made in the research and treatment of AML, citing key publications related to AML research and therapy in the English literature since 2000. The notable subsets of AML include acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), core-binding factor AML (CBF-AML), AML in younger patients fit for intensive chemotherapy, and AML in older/unfit patients (usually at the age cutoff of 60-70 years). We also consider within each subset whether the AML is primary or secondary (therapy-related, evolving from untreated or treated myelodysplastic syndrome or myeloproliferative neoplasm). In APL, therapy with all-trans retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide results in estimated 10-year survival rates of ≥80%. Treatment of CBF-AML with fludarabine, high-dose cytarabine, and gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) results in estimated 10-year survival rates of ≥75%. In younger/fit patients, the "3+7" regimen (3 days of daunorubicin + 7 days of cytarabine) produces less favorable results (estimated 5-year survival rates of 35%; worse in real-world experience); regimens that incorporate high-dose cytarabine, adenosine nucleoside analogs, and GO are producing better results. Adding venetoclax, FLT3, and IDH inhibitors into these regimens has resulted in encouraging preliminary data. In older/unfit patients, low-intensity therapy with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) and venetoclax is now the new standard of care. Better low-intensity regimens incorporating cladribine, low-dose cytarabine, and other targeted therapies (FLT3 and IDH inhibitors) are emerging. Maintenance therapy now has a definite role in the treatment of AML, and oral HMAs with potential treatment benefits are also available. In conclusion, AML therapy is evolving rapidly and treatment results are improving in all AML subsets as novel agents and strategies are incorporated into traditional AML chemotherapy. LAY SUMMARY: Ongoing research in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is progressing rapidly. Since 2017, the US Food and Drug Administration has approved 10 drugs for different AML indications. This review updates the research and treatment pathways for AML.
Subject(s)
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Age Factors , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Arsenic Trioxide/therapeutic use , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/therapeutic use , Cladribine/therapeutic use , Core Binding Factors , Cytarabine/therapeutic use , Daunorubicin/therapeutic use , Gemtuzumab/therapeutic use , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/etiology , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute/drug therapy , Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute/mortality , Maintenance Chemotherapy , Mutation , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/complications , Myeloproliferative Disorders/complications , Neoplasm, Residual , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Survival Rate , Translational Research, Biomedical , Tretinoin/therapeutic use , Vidarabine/analogs & derivatives , Vidarabine/therapeutic useABSTRACT
FLT3-ITD is a constitutively activated variant of the FLT3 tyrosine kinase receptor. Its expression in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with a poor prognosis. Due to this, the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) blocking FLT3-ITD became a rational therapeutic concept. This review describes key milestones in the clinical development of different FLT3-specific TKI with a particular focus on FLT3-TKI maintenance therapy in remission after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Recent evidence from randomized trials using sorafenib in FLT3-ITD mutated AML provided a proof of concept that targeted post-HCT maintenance therapy could become a new treatment paradigm in AML.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Maintenance Chemotherapy , Mutation , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Sorafenib , fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3/geneticsABSTRACT
The need for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with high-risk (HR) features and adequate measurable residual disease (MRD) clearance remains unclear. The aim of the ALL-HR-11 trial was to evaluate the outcomes of HR Ph- adult ALL patients following chemotherapy or allo-HSCT administered based on end-induction and consolidation MRD levels. Patients aged 15 to 60 years with HR-ALL in complete response (CR) and MRD levels (centrally assessed by 8-color flow cytometry) <0.1% after induction and <0.01% after early consolidation were assigned to receive delayed consolidation and maintenance therapy up to 2 years in CR. The remaining patients were allocated to allo-HSCT. CR was attained in 315/348 patients (91%), with MRD <0.1% after induction in 220/289 patients (76%). By intention-to-treat, 218 patients were assigned to chemotherapy and 106 to allo-HSCT. The 5-year (±95% confidence interval) cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), overall survival (OS), and event-free survival probabilities for the whole series were 43% ± 7%, 49% ± 7%, and 40% ± 6%, respectively, with CIR and OS rates of 45% ± 8% and 59% ± 9% for patients assigned to chemotherapy and of 40% ± 12% and 38% ± 11% for those assigned to allo-HSCT, respectively. Our results show that avoiding allo-HSCT does not hamper the outcomes of HR Ph- adult ALL patients up to 60 years with adequate MRD response after induction and consolidation. Better postremission alternative therapies are especially needed for patients with poor MRD clearance. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as # NCT01540812.
Subject(s)
Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Consolidation Chemotherapy , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Induction Chemotherapy , Maintenance Chemotherapy , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm, Residual/diagnosis , Neoplasm, Residual/genetics , Philadelphia Chromosome , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/diagnosis , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/genetics , Prognosis , Transplantation, Homologous , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
Mutations in the FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) gene arise in 25-30% of all acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. These mutations lead to constitutive activation of the protein product and are divided in two broad types: internal tandem duplication (ITD) of the juxtamembrane domain (25% of cases) and point mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain (TKD). Patients with FLT3 ITD mutations have a high relapse risk and inferior cure rates, whereas the role of FLT3 TKD mutations still remains to be clarified. Additionally, growing research indicates that FLT3 status evolves through a disease continuum (clonal evolution), where AML cases can acquire FLT3 mutations at relapse - not present in the moment of diagnosis. Several FLT3 inhibitors have been tested in patients with FLT3-mutated AML. These drugs exhibit different kinase inhibitory profiles, pharmacokinetics and adverse events. First-generation multi-kinase inhibitors (sorafenib, midostaurin, lestaurtinib) are characterized by a broad-spectrum of drug targets, whereas second-generation inhibitors (quizartinib, crenolanib, gilteritinib) show more potent and specific FLT3 inhibition, and are thereby accompanied by less toxic effects. Notwithstanding, all FLT3 inhibitors face primary and acquired mechanisms of resistance, and therefore the combinations with other drugs (standard chemotherapy, hypomethylating agents, checkpoint inhibitors) and its application in different clinical settings (upfront therapy, maintenance, relapsed or refractory disease) are under study in a myriad of clinical trials. This review focuses on the role of FLT3 mutations in AML, pharmacological features of FLT3 inhibitors, known mechanisms of drug resistance and accumulated evidence for the use of FLT3 inhibitors in different clinical settings.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Sorafenib/pharmacology , fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3/antagonists & inhibitors , fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3/genetics , Aniline Compounds/pharmacology , Benzimidazoles/pharmacology , Benzothiazoles/pharmacology , Carbazoles/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Multiple , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Forecasting , Furans , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Imidazoles/pharmacology , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Maintenance Chemotherapy/methods , Mutation , Phenylurea Compounds/pharmacology , Piperidines/pharmacology , Point Mutation , Pyrazines/pharmacology , Pyridazines/pharmacology , Recurrence , Staurosporine/analogs & derivatives , Staurosporine/pharmacologyABSTRACT
Real-world practice patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), including the adoption of maintenance rituximab (MR) therapy in the United States (US), have been reported in few studies since the release of the National LymphoCare Study almost a decade ago. We analyzed data from the largest integrated healthcare system in the United States, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), to identify rates of adoption and effectiveness of MR in FL patients after first-line (1L) treatment. We identified previously untreated patients with FL in the VHA between 2006 and 2014 who achieved at least stable disease after chemoimmunotherapy or immunotherapy. Among these patients, those who initiated MR within 238 days of 1L composed the MR group, whereas those who did not were classified as the non-MR group. We examined the effect of MR on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A total of 676 patients met our inclusion criteria, of whom 300 received MR. MR was associated with significant PFS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.55, P < .001) and OS (HR = 0.53, P = .005) compared to the non-MR group, after adjusting by age, sex, ethnicity, geographic region, diagnosis period, stage, grade at diagnosis, hemoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), 1L treatment regimen, and response to 1L treatment. These results suggest that in FL patients who do not experience disease progression after 1L treatment in real-world settings, MR is associated with a significant improvement in both PFS and OS. Maintenance therapy should be considered in FL patients who successfully complete and respond to 1L therapy.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Lymphoma, Follicular/drug therapy , Lymphoma, Follicular/epidemiology , Rituximab/therapeutic use , Veterans Health/statistics & numerical data , Veterans , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Lymphoma, Follicular/diagnosis , Lymphoma, Follicular/mortality , Maintenance Chemotherapy , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Rituximab/administration & dosage , Rituximab/adverse effects , SEER Program , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Despite undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT), patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with internal tandem duplication mutation in the FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 gene (FLT3-ITD) have a poor prognosis, frequently relapse, and die as a result of AML. It is currently unknown whether a maintenance therapy using FLT3 inhibitors, such as the multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib, improves outcome after HCT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase II trial (SORMAIN; German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00000591), 83 adult patients with FLT3-ITD-positive AML in complete hematologic remission after HCT were randomly assigned to receive for 24 months either the multitargeted and FLT3-kinase inhibitor sorafenib (n = 43) or placebo (n = 40 placebo). Relapse-free survival (RFS) was the primary endpoint of this trial. Relapse was defined as relapse or death, whatever occurred first. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 41.8 months, the hazard ratio (HR) for relapse or death in the sorafenib group versus placebo group was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.85; log-rank P = .013). The 24-month RFS probability was 53.3% (95% CI, 0.36 to 0.68) with placebo versus 85.0% (95% CI, 0.70 to 0.93) with sorafenib (HR, 0.256; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.65; log-rank P = .002). Exploratory data show that patients with undetectable minimal residual disease (MRD) before HCT and those with detectable MRD after HCT derive the strongest benefit from sorafenib. CONCLUSION: Sorafenib maintenance therapy reduces the risk of relapse and death after HCT for FLT3-ITD-positive AML.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Mutation , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Sorafenib/therapeutic use , Tandem Repeat Sequences , fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Double-Blind Method , Female , Germany , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/mortality , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/enzymology , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Maintenance Chemotherapy , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm, Residual , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Recurrence , Sorafenib/adverse effects , Time Factors , Transplantation, Homologous , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Maintenance chemotherapeutic regimen with low toxicity is needed for metastatic colorectal cancer. A recent patent has been issued on the spleen-strengthening and detoxification prescription (JPJDF), a traditional Chinese herbal medicinal formula with anti-angiogenesis effect. The clinical effect of JPJDF on the maintenance treatment of advanced colorectal cancer has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of JPJDF in combination with fluoropyrimidine compared to fluoropyrimidine alone as maintenance therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS: We applied a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, single center clinical study design. A total of 137 patients with advanced colorectal cancer were recruited. Patients received either Fluoropyrimidine (Flu-treated group, n = 68), or Fluoropyrimidine plus JPJDF (Flu-F-treated group, n = 69) as maintenance treatment after 6-cycle of FOLFOX4 or FOLFORI induction treatment. The primary endpoints were Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were safety, Performance Status (PS) score and other symptoms. RESULTS: The endpoint of disease progression was observed in 91.7% of patients. The PFS was 5.0 months and 3.0 months in the Flu-F-treated and Flu-treated groups, respectively. The OS was 15.0 months and 9.0 months in the Flu-F-treated and Flu-treated groups, respectively. Some common symptoms, such as hypodynamia, anepithymia, dizziness and tinnitus and shortness of breath, were improved in the Flu-F-treated group. There was no significant difference in the common adverse reactions between the two groups. CONCLUSION: JPJDF and fluoropyrimidine have synergistic effect in the maintenance treatment of mCRC.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Drugs, Chinese Herbal/pharmacology , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Double-Blind Method , Drug Synergism , Drugs, Chinese Herbal/administration & dosage , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/pharmacology , Humans , Leucovorin/administration & dosage , Maintenance Chemotherapy , Male , Middle Aged , Organoplatinum Compounds/administration & dosage , Patents as Topic , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
Treatment of vasculitides associated with anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibodies (ANCA) (AAVs) has evolved dramatically in recent years, particularly since the demonstration of rituximab efficacy as remission induction and maintenance therapy for granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis. In 2013, the French Vasculitis Study Group (FVSG) published recommendations for its use by clinicians. Since then, new data have made it possible to better specify and codify prescription of rituximab to treat AAVs. Herein, the FVSG Recommendations Committee, an expert panel comprised of physicians with extensive experience in the treatment and management of vasculitides, presents its consensus guidelines based on literature analysis, the results of prospective therapeutic trials and personal experience.
Subject(s)
Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis/therapy , Biological Therapy/standards , Cardiology/standards , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Maintenance Chemotherapy/standards , Biological Therapy/methods , Cardiology/organization & administration , France , Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis/drug therapy , Humans , Maintenance Chemotherapy/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Remission Induction , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Societies, Medical/standardsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: S-1, a new oral fluorouracil chemotherapeutical drug, has been increasingly used in clinical maintenance after first-line chemotherapy for stage III or IV gastric carcinoma (GC) and colorectal carcinoma (CRC) for its own advantages. XiangshaLiujunzi Decoction (XSLJZD), a classic traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formula with effects of alleviating the adverse reactions of chemotherapy and improving the quality of life of cancer patients has been gradually confirmed, with no more reports about the maintenance therapy mode of combination of chemotherapeutic drugs and TCM. We designed the study of XSLJZD combined with S-1 in the maintenance therapy of Stage III or IV GC and CRC, and hoped that this research program will go further and comprehensively evaluate its efficacy and safety. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of XSLJZD combined with S-1 in the maintenance therapy of stage III or IV GC and CRC. METHODS: This study is an open, single-center, randomized study. Patients with stage III or stage IV GC and CRC will be randomized (1:1) into S-1group, S-1 combined with XSLJZD group for 5 years of maintenance therapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, and secondary end point was overall survival and Quality of Life Assessment (QOLA), which include an improvement in symptoms before and after treatment, Karnofsky Performance Status, and adverse events assessment. DISCUSSION: This study will provide meaningful clinical information about the combination of chemotherapeutic drugs S-1 with TCM in the maintenance therapy of stage III or IV GC and CRC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR-INR-16008575.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Drugs, Chinese Herbal/administration & dosage , Maintenance Chemotherapy , Oxonic Acid/administration & dosage , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Tegafur/administration & dosage , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Drug Combinations , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Phytotherapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Biologic therapies have been available for inflammatory bowel disease for >20 years, but patient outcomes have not changed appreciably over this time period. To better understand medication utilization for this disease, we evaluated a novel technique for visualizing treatment pathways, including initial treatment, switching, and combination therapies. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study used administrative claims data from the Truven Health MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Database. Adult patients with ≥2 consecutive health claims and newly diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) were evaluated. Treatment pathways were visualized using Sankey diagrams representing the number of patients receiving treatment and duration of each treatment. RESULTS: In all, 28,119 patients with UC and 16,260 patients with CD were identified. The most common initial treatment for UC was 5-aminosalicylic acid monotherapy (61% of the patients), followed by corticosteroid monotherapy (25%); <1% of patients were initially treated with biologics. The most common initial treatment for CD was corticosteroid monotherapy (42%), followed by 5-aminosalicylic acid monotherapy (35%); <5% of the patients were initially treated with biologics. Significantly fewer patients followed biologic vs nonbiologic treatment pathways (UC: 6% vs 94%, CD: 19% vs 81%, both P < 0.05). DISCUSSION: Significantly fewer patients with inflammatory bowel disease followed treatment pathways that included biologic therapies compared with nonbiologic therapies, and very few patients were ever initiated on biologic therapy. Although we have made significant progress in treatment, our most effective medications are only being used in a small proportion of patients, suggesting barriers prevent optimized patient management.
Subject(s)
Biological Products/therapeutic use , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Critical Pathways/statistics & numerical data , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Administrative Claims, Healthcare/statistics & numerical data , Colitis, Ulcerative/immunology , Crohn Disease/immunology , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Drug Therapy, Combination/statistics & numerical data , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Geography , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Humans , Induction Chemotherapy/methods , Induction Chemotherapy/statistics & numerical data , Maintenance Chemotherapy/methods , Maintenance Chemotherapy/statistics & numerical data , Male , Mesalamine/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a complication of cirrhosis of the liver causing neuropsychiatric abnormalities. Clinical manifestations of overt HE result in increased health care resource utilization and effects on patient quality of life. While lactulose has historically been the mainstay of treatment for acute HE and maintenance of remission, there is an unmet need for additional therapeutic options with a favorable adverse event profile. Compared with lactulose alone, rifaximin has demonstrated proven efficacy in complete reversal of HE and reduction in the incidence of HE recurrence, mortality, and hospitalizations. Evidence suggests the benefit of long-term prophylactic therapy with rifaximin; however, there is a need to assess the economic impact of rifaximin treatment in patients with HE. OBJECTIVE: To assess the incremental cost-effectiveness of rifaximin ± lactulose versus lactulose monotherapy in patients with overt HE. METHODS: A Markov model was developed in Excel with 4 health states (remission, overt HE, liver transplantation, and death) to predict costs and outcomes of patients with HE after initiation of maintenance therapy with rifaximin ± lactulose to avoid recurrent HE episodes. Cost-effectiveness of rifaximin was evaluated through estimation of incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) or life-year (LY) gained. Analyses were conducted over a lifetime horizon. One-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess uncertainty in results. RESULTS: The rifaximin ± lactulose regimen provided added health benefits despite an additional cost versus lactulose monotherapy. Model results showed an incremental benefit of $29,161 per QALY gained and $27,762 per LY gained with rifaximin ± lactulose versus lactulose monotherapy. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the rifaximin ± lactulose regimen was cost-effective ~99% of the time at a threshold of $50,000 per QALY/LY gained, which falls within the commonly accepted threshold for incremental cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical benefit of rifaximin, combined with an acceptable economic profile, demonstrates the advantages of rifaximin maintenance therapy as an important option to consider for patients at risk of recurrent HE. DISCLOSURES: This analysis was funded by Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US. Salix and Xcenda collaborated on the methods, and Salix, Xcenda, Jesudian, and Ahmad collaborated on the writing of the manuscript and interpretation of results. Bozkaya and Migliaccio-Walle are employees of Xcenda. Ahmad reports speaker fees from Salix Pharmaceuticals, unrelated to this study. Jesudian reports consulting and speaker fees from Salix Pharmaceuticals, unrelated to this study. The results from this model were presented at AASLD: The Liver Meeting 2014; November 7-11; Boston, MA.
Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Hepatic Encephalopathy/therapy , Liver Cirrhosis/therapy , Rifaximin/therapeutic use , Secondary Prevention/methods , Drug Costs/statistics & numerical data , Drug Therapy, Combination/economics , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Hepatic Encephalopathy/economics , Hepatic Encephalopathy/etiology , Hepatic Encephalopathy/mortality , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Lactulose/economics , Lactulose/therapeutic use , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/economics , Liver Cirrhosis/mortality , Liver Transplantation/economics , Liver Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Maintenance Chemotherapy/economics , Maintenance Chemotherapy/methods , Markov Chains , Models, Economic , Quality of Life , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Recurrence , Rifaximin/economics , Secondary Prevention/economicsABSTRACT
Enteral nutrition (EN) is effective in Crohn's disease (CD) patients and has been shown to have an inhibitory effect on loss of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha antibody therapy; however, the current level of evidence is not sufficient. The objective of this meta-analysis was to determine whether EN in combination anti-TNF-alpha antibody therapy is useful in maintaining remission. PubMed was used to identify all relevant studies. A total of nine articles were identified including one randomized control trial, two prospective cohort studies, and six retrospective cohort studies. We performed a meta-analysis on all these articles to assess the remission maintenance effect of EN (n = 857). The remission or response maintenance effect in the EN group was 203/288 (70.5%), which was higher than 306/569 (53.8%) in the non-EN group. The odds ratio for long-term remission or response using fixed effects model and random effects model were 2.23 (95% CI 1.60-3.10) and 2.19 (95% CI 1.49-3.22), respectively. The usefulness of EN was unclear in two prospective studies that were conducted immediately after remission induction with anti-TNF-alpha antibody therapy was detected. Differences in the definition of relapse and the observation period among articles were considered to be limitations. This analysis suggests that EN is effective for maintaining remission in patients already in remission or response as a result of anti-TNF-alpha antibody maintenance therapy.
Subject(s)
Crohn Disease/therapy , Enteral Nutrition , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Certolizumab Pegol/therapeutic use , Humans , Infliximab/therapeutic use , Maintenance ChemotherapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Indigo naturalis (IN) is a traditional Chinese herbal medicine reported to be effective in inducing remission in ulcerative colitis (UC). We conducted a retrospective observational study to investigate the efficacy and safety of IN for induction and maintenance therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: Data were collected from the electric medical records of patients with inflammatory bowel disease who had started IN treatment between March 2015 and April 2017 at Kyushu University Hospital. Clinical response and remission rates were assessed based on the clinical activity index determined by Rachmilewitz index or Crohn's disease (CD) activity index. Cumulative IN continuation rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Overall adverse events (AEs) during follow-up were also analyzed. RESULTS: Seventeen UC patients and eight CD patients were enrolled. Clinical response and remission rates at week 8 were 94.1% and 88.2% in UC patients and 37.5% and 25.0% in CD patients, respectively. Clinical remission rates, as assessed through non-responders imputation analyses at weeks 52 and 104, were 76.4% and 70.4% in UC patients and 25.0% and 25.0% in CD patients, respectively. Ten patients (40%) experienced AEs during follow-up. Three patients (12%) experienced severe AEs, including acute colitis requiring hospitalization in two patients and acute colitis with intussusception requiring surgery in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Indigo naturalis showed favorable therapeutic efficacy in UC, whereas its therapeutic efficacy in CD appeared to be modest. The risk of severe AEs should be recognized for IN treatment.
Subject(s)
Drugs, Chinese Herbal/therapeutic use , Indigo Carmine/chemistry , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Phytotherapy , Adult , Drugs, Chinese Herbal/adverse effects , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/mortality , Maintenance Chemotherapy , Male , Remission Induction , Survival Rate , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines support systemic therapy based on mutational status in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) reserved for oligoprogression. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the routine addition of SBRT to upfront therapy in stage IV NSCLC by mutational subgroup. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov state transition model was constructed to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing SBRT plus maintenance therapy with maintenance therapy alone for oligometastatic NSCLC. Three hypothetical cohorts were analyzed: epidermal growth factor receptor or anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutation-positive, programmed death ligand-1 expressing, and mutation-negative group. Clinical parameters were obtained largely from clinical trial data, and cost data were based on 2018 Medicare reimbursement. Strategies were compared using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio with effectiveness in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and evaluated with a willingness to pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY gained. RESULTS: SBRT plus maintenance therapy was not cost-effective at a $100,000/QALY gained threshold, assuming the same survival for both treatments, resulting in an incremental cost effectiveness ratio of $564,186 and $299,248 per QALY gained for the epidermal growth factor receptor or anaplastic lymphoma kinase positive and programmed death ligand-1 positive cohorts, respectively. Results were most sensitive to the cost of maintenance therapy. A large overall survival gain with SBRT could potentially result in upfront SBRT becoming cost-effective. For the mutation-negative cohort, upfront SBRT was nearly cost-effective, costing $128,424 per QALY gained. CONCLUSION: Adding SBRT to maintenance therapy is not a cost-effective strategy for oligometastatic NSCLC compared with maintenance therapy alone for mutation-positive groups. However, this should be validated via randomized trials.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/economics , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/radiotherapy , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Lung Neoplasms/economics , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiosurgery/economics , B7-H1 Antigen/genetics , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Cohort Studies , DNA Mutational Analysis , Female , Genes, erbB-1 , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Maintenance Chemotherapy , Male , Markov Chains , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Pennsylvania , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic disease of the gut. About 75% of people with CD undergo surgery at least once in their lifetime to induce remission. However, as there is no known cure for the disease, patients usually experience a recurrence even after surgery. Different interventions are routinely used in maintaining postsurgical remission. There is currently no consensus on which treatment is the most effective. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects and harms of interventions for the maintenance of surgically induced remission in Crohn's disease and rank the treatments in order of effectiveness. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane IBD Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase from inception to 15 January 2019. We also searched reference lists of relevant articles, abstracts from major gastroenterology meetings, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO ICTRP. There was no restriction on language, date, or publication status. SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered for inclusion randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared different interventions used for maintaining surgically induced remission in people with CD who were in postsurgical remission. Participants had to have received maintenance treatment for at least three months. We excluded studies assessing enteral diet, diet manipulation, herbal medicine, and nutritional supplementation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected relevant studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Any disagreements were resolved by discussion or by arbitration of a third review author when necessary. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) using a Bayesian approach through Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation. For the pairwise comparisons carried out in Review Manager 5, we calculated risk ratios (RR) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). For the NMA, we presented hazard ratios (HR) with corresponding 95% credible intervals (95% CrI) and reported ranking probabilities for each intervention. For the NMA, we focused on three main outcomes: clinical relapse, endoscopic relapse, and withdrawals due to adverse events. Data were insufficient to assess time to relapse and histologic relapse. Adverse events and serious adverse events were not sufficiently or objectively reported to permit an NMA. We used CINeMA (Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis) methods to evaluate our confidence in the findings within networks, and GRADE for entire networks. MAIN RESULTS: We included 35 RCTs (3249 participants) in the review. The average age of study participants ranged between 33.6 and 38.8 years. Risk of bias was high in 18 studies, low in four studies, and unclear in 13 studies. Of the 35 included RCTs, 26 studies (2581 participants; 9 interventions) were considered eligible for inclusion in the NMA. The interventions studied included 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), adalimumab, antibiotics, budesonide, infliximab, probiotics, purine analogues, sulfasalazine, and a combination of sulfasalazine and prednisolone. This resulted in 30 direct contrasts, which informed 102 mixed-treatment contrasts.The evidence for the clinical relapse network (21 studies; 2245 participants) and endoscopic relapse (12 studies; 1128 participants) were of low certainty while the evidence for withdrawal due to adverse events (15 studies; 1498 participants) was of very low certainty. This assessment was due to high risk of bias in most of the studies, inconsistency, and imprecision across networks. We mainly judged individual contrasts as of low or very low certainty, except 5-ASA versus placebo, the evidence for which was judged as of moderate certainty.We ranked the treatments based on effectiveness and the certainty of the evidence. For clinical relapse, the five most highly ranked treatments were adalimumab, infliximab, budesonide, 5-ASA, and purine analogues. We found some evidence that adalimumab (HR 0.11, 95% Crl 0.02 to 0.33; low-certainty evidence) and 5-ASA may reduce the probability of clinical relapse compared to placebo (HR 0.69, 95% Crl 0.53 to 0.87; moderate-certainty evidence). However, budesonide may not be effective in preventing clinical relapse (HR 0.66, 95% CrI 0.27 to 1.34; low-certainty evidence). We are less confident about the effectiveness of infliximab (HR 0.36, 95% CrI 0.02 to 1.74; very low-certainty evidence) and purine analogues (HR 0.75, 95% CrI 0.55 to 1.00; low-certainty evidence). It was unclear whether the other interventions reduced the probability of a clinical relapse, as the certainty of the evidence was very low.Due to high risk of bias and limited data across the network, we are uncertain about the effectiveness of interventions for preventing endoscopic relapse. Whilst there might be some evidence of prevention of endoscopic relapse with adalimumab (HR 0.10, 95% CrI 0.01 to 0.32; low-certainty evidence), no other intervention studied appeared to be effective.Due to high risk of bias and limited data across the network, we are uncertain about the effectiveness of interventions for preventing withdrawal due to adverse events. Withdrawal due to adverse events appeared to be least likely with sulfasalazine (HR 1.96, 95% Crl 0.00 to 8.90; very low-certainty evidence) and most likely with antibiotics (HR 53.92, 95% Crl 0.43 to 259.80; very low-certainty evidence). When considering the network as a whole, two adverse events leading to study withdrawal (i.e. pancreatitis and leukopenia) occurred in more than 1% of participants treated with an intervention. Pancreatitis occurred in 2.8% (11/399) of purine analogue participants compared to 0.17% (2/1210) of all other groups studied. Leukopenia occurred in 2.5% (10/399) of purine analogue participants compared to 0.08% (1/1210) of all other groups studied. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Due to low-certainty evidence in the networks, we are unable to draw conclusions on which treatment is most effective for preventing clinical relapse and endoscopic relapse. Evidence on the safety of the interventions was inconclusive, however cases of pancreatitis and leukopenia from purine analogues were evident in the studies. Larger trials are needed to further understand the effect of the interventions on endoscopic relapse.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Crohn Disease/prevention & control , Maintenance Chemotherapy/methods , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Antimetabolites/therapeutic use , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Crohn Disease/surgery , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Network Meta-Analysis , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Recurrence , Remission Induction , Secondary PreventionABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutations have a very poor prognosis, despite use of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and salvage treatments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We previously reported the safety and efficacy of sorafenib, an FLT3 inhibitor, as a maintenance agent after allo-HSCT in patients diagnosed with AML with FLT3 mutations. We provide an update on the 27 patients with FLT3-mutated AML in our original report, who received sorafenib as a single maintenance agent. RESULTS: Since our previous report, others have confirmed our reported significant overall survival and progression-free survival in patients who received sorafenib before and/or after allo-HSCT. In this update on the 27 patients with FLT3-mutated AML in our original report, we show persistence of the previously reported impressive long-term disease control. CONCLUSION: Our results, with longer follow-up than in our previous report, together with those of others, further support the use of sorafenib as a maintenance agent after allo-HSCT.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/mortality , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Sorafenib/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Cohort Studies , Combined Modality Therapy , Feasibility Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/pathology , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Maintenance Chemotherapy , Male , Middle Aged , Mutation , Prognosis , Remission Induction , Survival Rate , Transplantation, Homologous , Young Adult , fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3/antagonists & inhibitors , fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3/geneticsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of maintenance therapy with the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) not undergoing transplantation. METHODS: Data were pooled from four NDMM phase I/II studies; patients received induction therapy with once- or twice-weekly ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd), melphalan-prednisone (IMP), or cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (ICd), followed by single-agent ixazomib maintenance, given at the last tolerated dose during induction, until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients achieved stable disease or better after induction (weekly IRd, n = 25; twice-weekly IRd, n = 18; weekly or twice-weekly IMP, n = 35; weekly ICd, n = 43) and received ≥ 1 dose of ixazomib maintenance. Grade ≥ 3 drug-related adverse events occurred in 24% of patients during maintenance; each event was reported in ≤2% of patients. Rates of complete response were 22% after induction and 35% after maintenance. A total of 28 patients (23%) improved their response during maintenance. CONCLUSIONS: Ixazomib maintenance following ixazomib-based induction is associated with deepening of responses and a positive safety profile with no cumulative toxicity in patients with NDMM not undergoing transplantation, suggesting that ixazomib is feasible for long-term administration. Phase III investigation of ixazomib maintenance is ongoing.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Boron Compounds/therapeutic use , Glycine/analogs & derivatives , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Protease Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Boron Compounds/administration & dosage , Boron Compounds/adverse effects , Female , Glycine/administration & dosage , Glycine/adverse effects , Glycine/therapeutic use , Humans , Maintenance Chemotherapy , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Protease Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Protease Inhibitors/adverse effects , Quality of Life , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Long-acting ß2-agonists (LABAs) and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) are recommended as initial maintenance treatments for COPD, with their combination (LABA-LAMA) advocated as the disease progresses. Randomized trials comparing the effectiveness of this combination with the alternative combination of LABA with inhaled corticosteroid (LABA-ICS) have reported conflicting data, while there are no real-world comparative effectiveness and safety studies of these regimens in clinical practice settings. METHODS: We identified a cohort of patients with COPD during 2002-2015, age 55 years or older, from the United Kingdom's Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Patients initiating LABA-LAMA on the same day (no ICS) were matched on time-conditional high-dimensional propensity scores with patients initiating LABA-ICS on the same day (no LAMA), and monitored for 1 year for the occurrence of a moderate or severe COPD exacerbation and severe pneumonia. RESULTS: The cohort included 1,977 initiators of LABA-LAMA matched with 1,977 initiators of LABA-ICS. The hazard ratio (HR) of moderate or severe COPD exacerbation associated with LABA-LAMA initiation, relative to LABA-ICS initiation, was 1.04 (95% CI, 0.90-1.20), while for a severe exacerbation it was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.65-1.36). The incidence of severe pneumonia requiring hospitalization was lower with LABA-LAMA initiation (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.41-1.05), particularly in the on-treatment analysis (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50-0.87). CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world clinical practice setting of COPD treatment, combined LABA-LAMA inhalers appear to be as effective as combined LABA-ICS inhalers in preventing COPD exacerbations. However, a LABA-LAMA combination may be preferred because it is associated with fewer severe pneumonias.