Mirror therapy combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation for poststroke lower extremity motor function recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The combination of mirror therapy (MT) and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been devised as an intervention method in stroke rehabilitation; however, few studies have investigated its efficacy in lower extremity motor function recovery. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we examined the effectiveness of combined MT and NMES therapy in improving poststroke walking speed, spasticity, balance and other gait parameters. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected from PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Scopus databases. In total, six RCTs which involving 181 participants were included. Our findings indicate that MT combined with NMES elicits greater improvement relative to control group in walking speed (SMD = 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-1.07, P = 0.001), Berg Balance Scale (SMD = 0.72; 95% CI 0.31-1.13; P = 0.0007), cadence (SMD = 0.59, 95% CI 0.02-1.16, P = 0.04), step length (SMD = 0.94, 95% CI 0.35-1.53, P = 0.002), and stride length (SMD = 0.95, 95% CI 0.36-1.54, P = 0.002) but not in modified Ashworth scale (SMD = - 0.40, 95% CI - 1.05 to 0.26, P = 0.23). Our findings suggest that MT combined with NMES may be a suitable supplemental intervention to conventional therapy in stroke survivors.

[Effects of Mirror Therapy Combined With Task-Oriented Training on Limb Function Recovery in Stroke Patients With Hemiplegia].

Objective: To explore the effects of mirror therapy combined with task-oriented training on limb function recovery in stroke patients with hemiplegia. Methods: A total of 304 older patients with post-stroke hemiplegia who received treatment in Nanyang Third People's Hospital between March 2020 and March 2022 were enrolled as the subjects. They were assigned to the intervention group and the control group through a systematic randomization method, with 152 patients in each group. The control group was treated with conventional medication and task-oriented training, while the intervention group received a combined mirror therapy in addition to the treatment given to the control group. Both groups received continuous treatment for 3 months. The pre-treatment findings and those obtained after 3 month of treatment were compared between the two groups in the following areas, the neurological functions, including the levels of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and S100ß, a central nervous system specific protein, upper and lower limb motor function as reflected by Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) score, balance ability as measured by Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and the integrated electromyography (iEMG) values of quadriceps femoris, gastrocnemius, and tibialis anterior muscles, three-dimensional gait spatiotemporal parameters, and quality of life as reflected by the assessment results for the National Institute of Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL). The findings were compared to identify changes. Results: After 3 months of treatment, the FMA and BBS scores and three-dimensional gait spatio-temporal parameters in the intervention group were significantly better than those in the control group (all P<0.05). Conclusion: Mirror therapy combined with task-oriented training promotes the function recovery of the affected limbs in older patients with post-stroke hemiplegia, effectively improves their motor function and quality of life, and helps improve patient prognosis.

Is mirror therapy associated with progressive muscle relaxation more effective than mirror therapy alone in reducing phantom limb pain in patients with lower limb amputation?

Mirror therapy is a widely used treatment for phantom limb pain (PLP) relief in patients with limb loss. Less common is progressive muscle relaxation (PMR), used mostly in other medical conditions (psychological, terminal cancer pain, etc). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a mirror therapy preceded by PMR intervention compared to mirror therapy preceded by unguided generic relaxation-mirror therapy in patients with lower limb amputation suffering from PLP. This pilot study was a single-blind, controlled, randomized trial. Thirty lower limb amputees suffering from PLP were recruited and randomly assigned to three groups respectively undergoing a PMR-mirror therapy rehabilitative intervention, generic relaxation-mirror therapy, and conventional physiotherapy (ConvPT). Selected items from Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) were used to test the pain features at the beginning and 1 week after 3 weeks of intervention. A decrease of about 65% was found in the rate and duration of PLP at the PEQ in PMR-mirror therapy with respect to generic relaxation-mirror therapy (about 30%) and ConvPT (about 6%). A decrease of about 90% in intensity (worst and average) of PLP in PMR-mirror therapy when compared to generic relaxation-mirror therapy (about 45%) and ConvPT (about 20%) was found at the BPI. We preliminary concluded, albeit with limitations due to the small sample of patients, that mirror therapy can improve PLP when associated with PMR. Further studies are required to confirm that PMR could be an effective technique for more successful PLP management.

Synergic effect of the combination of mirror therapy and electrical stimulation for lower extremity motor function recovery in stroke survivors: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the synergic effect of the combination of mirror therapy and electrical stimulation on lower limb motor function recovery in stroke survivors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, CNKI, Wan Fang, CBM were searched from inception to December 2020. Randomized controlled trials that compared the combined therapy with another single therapy were included. A pre-determined data collection form was used to extract data. Two authors independently extracted data and used the Cochrane Handbook criteria to assess the quality of included studies. RESULTS: Six studies, with a total of 437 patients were included. There was an overall positive effect on lower limb motor function recovery, according to Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the Lower Extremity [all: WMD in fixed effects model: 5.63, 95% CI 4.86, 6.39] and Brunnstrom stage [all: WMD in fixed effects model: 0.49, 95% CI 0.32, 0.66]. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the combination of mirror therapy and electrical stimulation for lower extremity motor function recovery in stroke survivors may have a positive effect.

Effect of functional electrical stimulation-based mirror therapy using gesture recognition biofeedback on upper extremity function in patients with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Mirror therapy (MT) is an intervention used for upper extremity rehabilitation in stroke patients and has been studied in various fields. Recently, effective MT methods have been introduced in combination with neuromuscular electrical stimulation or with electromyography (EMG)-triggered biofeedback. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of functional electrical stimulation (FES)-based MT incorporating a motion recognition biofeedback device on upper extremity motor recovery to chronic stroke patients. METHODS: Twenty-six chronic stroke patients with onset of more than 6 months were randomly assigned into experimental group (n = 13) and control group (n = 13). Both groups participated in conventional rehabilitation program, while the control group received conventional MT intervention and the experimental group received FES-based MT with motion recognition biofeedback device. All interventions were conducted for 30 min/d, 5 d/wk, for 4 weeks. Upper limb motor recovery, upper limb function, active-range of motion (ROM), and activities of daily living independence were measured before and after the intervention and compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), manual function test (MFT), K-MBI, and active-ROM (excluding deviation) were significantly improved in both groups (P < .05). Only the experimental group showed significant improvement in upper extremity recovery, ulnar and radial deviation (P < .05). There was a significant difference of change in Brunstrom's recovery level, FMA, MFT, and active-ROM in the experimental group compared to the control group (P < .05). CONCLUSION: FES-based MT using gesture recognition biofeedback is an effective intervention method for improving upper extremity motor recovery and function, active-ROM in patients with chronic stroke. This study suggests that incorporating gesture-recognition biofeedback into FES-based MT can provide additional benefits to patients with chronic stroke.

[Restoration of hand function in patients with hemiparesis using mirror therapy in combination with myofascial stretching and postisometric relaxation]. / Vosstanovlenie funktsii kisti u patsientov s gemiparezom s primeneniem metoda zerkal'noi terapii v sochetanii s miofastsial'nym rastyazheniem i postizometricheskoi relaksatsiei.

The increase in the number of cerebral strokes is accompanied by the accumulation of patients with hemiparesis. It is especially difficult to restore the function of the upper limb, in particular the hand, which significantly limits the social, domestic and labor adaptation of patients. This makes it relevant to search for new methods for restoring the functions of the hand. Today, mirror therapy is becoming increasingly popular, which, however, does not eliminate myogenic contractures in the joints of a paralyzed limb. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Rationale for the use of mirror therapy in combination with myofascial stretching and postisometric relaxation in patients with hemiparesis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 277 patients with hemiparesis were examined, of which 68 patients were included in the main group; 209 - to the comparison group. All patients underwent a course of rehabilitation treatment for 10 days. Patients of the main group additionally received mirror therapy in combination with myofascial stretching and post-isometric relaxation: course - 10 individual sessions, session duration - 30 minutes. Upon admission and before discharge, patients were evaluated for neurological status, severity of spastic and pain syndromes; the strength of the muscles of the paralyzed upper limb according to the Lovett scale; tested self-service skills in accordance with the International Classification of Functioning, Disabilities and Health. RESULTS: In patients of both groups, the severity of spastic and pain syndromes decreased, muscle strength increased. In the main group, these changes were more pronounced; 35 patients of the main group mastered new types of grip, which statistically significantly improved their social adaptability. CONCLUSION: Mirror therapy in combination with soft manual therapy techniques is able to restore precise targeted movements in the joints of the hand and fingers, form different grip options, which expands the possibilities of self-care for patients.

Pain relief by movement representation strategies: An umbrella and mapping review with meta-meta-analysis of motor imagery, action observation and mirror therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a mapping and umbrella review with a meta-meta-analysis (MMA) to critically evaluate the current evidence of motor imagery (MI), action observation and mirror therapy (MT) on pain intensity. METHODS: The study involved a systematic search of PubMed, PEDro, Scielo, EBSCO and Google Scholar. RESULTS: Ten systematic reviews were included in the qualitative synthesis, 70% of which showed high methodological quality. Three reviews found a significant reduction in chronic musculoskeletal pain as the result of applying movement representation methods (MRM) plus usual-care (UC), with a large clinical effect (standardized mean difference [SMD] of -1.47; 95% CI -2.05 to -0.88; heterogeneity Q = 1.66; p = 0.44; I2  = 0%). However, two reviews showed no statistically significant reduction in acute and postsurgical pain as a result of applying MI plus UC. Four reviews showed no significant reduction in phantom limb pain (PLP) as a result of applying MT plus UC interventions. In four reviews, the MMA showed a significant reduction in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) as a result of applying MT plus UC, with a large clinical effect (SMD -1.27; 95% CI -1.87 to -0.67; heterogeneity Q = 3.95; p = 0.27; I2  = 24%). In two reviews, the MMA showed no significant differences in poststroke pain as a result of applying MT plus UC. CONCLUSION: Results show that MRM could be effective for chronic musculoskeletal pain, with low to moderate-quality evidence. The results also show a reduction in pain intensity through MT interventions in patients with CRPS, although these results were not found in patients with PLP or poststroke pain. SIGNIFICANCE: This umbrella review analysed systematic reviews evaluating movement representation techniques, with the aim of synthesizing the available evidence regarding motor imagery, action observation and mirror therapy on pain. The results provide relevant information about the potential clinical use of movement representation techniques in different types of patients with painful conditions.

Mirror therapy in upper limb motor recovery and activities of daily living, and its neural correlates in stroke individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Available literature indicates that 30-66% of stroke survivors present persistent upper limb impairment. Considering the importance of upper limb function for activities of daily living, it is necessary to investigate neurorehabilitation therapies that could improve the upper limb function. Among stroke complementary therapies, mirror therapy has shown promising results. Thus, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analyses was to review and synthesize clinical evidence on the use of mirror therapy on motor recovery of the upper limb and activities of daily living, and its neural correlates in stroke patients. The literature search was carried out in PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Twenty-nine studies met all the inclusion criteria. Two meta-analyses were conducted to compare mirror therapy with sham therapy on two general measures, upper limb assessment and activities of daily living. Results suggest that mirror therapy was better than sham therapy, mainly in the subacute phase, but the meta-analyses were nonsignificant. In addition, mirror therapy and cortical reorganization showed potential neural correlates, such as the primary motor cortex, precuneus, and posterior cingulate cortex.