How to improve the surveillance of the Taliban ban's impact on European drug markets.

In April 2023, the Taliban banned poppy cultivation and the trade of all narcotics. This caused a 95% reduction in opium production. Usually, that would be good news. But there is a substantial worry: synthetic opioids might fill the void left by heroin. This is concerning because these drugs have led to health emergencies in areas where they are prevalent. This paper highlights the limitations of the current drug surveillance system in Europe and proposes improvements. It argues that reliance on secondary data is insufficient. Instead, we need to interview a sentinel group of people who inject drugs and adjust city-level sentinel systems, such as wastewater analysis, to specifically track the spread of synthetic opioids. Without these proactive steps, we risk only noticing a transition from heroin to synthetic opioids after it has occurred, with its harmful impacts already in place.

Narcotic analgesics.

There is documentation of the use of opium derived products in the ancient history of the Assyrians: the Egyptians; in the sixth century AD by the Roman Dioscorides; and by Avicenna (980-1037). Reference to opium like products is made by Paracelsus and by Shakespeare. Charles Louis Derosne and Fredrich Wilhelm Adam Serturner isolated morphine from raw opium in 1802 and 1806 respectively, and it was Sertürner who named the substance morphine, after Morpheus, the Greek God of dreams. By the middle 1800s, Opium and related opioid derived products were the source of a major addiction in USA, and to some extent in the United Kingdom. Opioid products are of major therapeutic value in the treatment of pain from injury, post surgery, intractable pain conditions, and some forms of terminal cancer.

The Opium Wars of China in the Nineteenth Century and America in the Twenty-First.

The Opium Wars of 1839-1843 and 1856-1860 revealed the devastating effects of narcotic addiction on the health of the body politic of China. The defeated Qing dynasty lost effective sovereignty to the British, leaving it helpless against more than 100 years of exploitation by the European powers, the United States, and Japan. Today we see the same risk posed by prescription narcotics and illegal opioids imported from China that can be seen as retribution for the "Century of Humiliation" nearly two centuries ago.

Patient Perceptions of Integrating Meditation-based Interventions in Office-based Opioid Treatment with Buprenorphine: A Mixed-methods Survey.

INTRODUCTION: Recent findings support the provision of meditation-based interventions (MBIs) in primary care. However, the acceptability of MBI among patients prescribed medications for opioid use disorder (eg, buprenorphine) in primary care remains unclear. This study assessed experiences and preferences for adopting MBI among patients prescribed buprenorphine in office-based opioid treatment (OBOT). METHODS: This 23-item, semistructured cross-sectional survey was administered by study staff to patients enrolled in OBOT (N = 72) and consisted of demographic and clinical characteristics, perceptions, experiences with MBI, and preferred strategies to access MBI to support their treatment on buprenorphine. RESULTS: Most participants reported practicing at least 1 category of MBI (90.3%) on at least a daily (39.6%) or weekly (41.7%) basis including (1) spiritual meditation (eg, centering prayer; 67.7%); (2) nonmantra meditation (eg, comfortable posture; 61.3%); (3) mindfulness meditation (eg, mindfulness-based stress reduction; 54.8%); and (4) mantra meditation (eg, transcendental meditation; 29.0%). Interest in MBI was motivated by improving one's general health and well-being (73.4%), treatment outcomes with medications for OUD (eg, buprenorphine; 60.9%), and relationships with others (60.9%). Perceived clinical benefits of MBI included reduced anxiety or depression symptoms (70.3%), pain (62.5%), illicit substance or alcohol use (60.9%), cravings for illicit substances (57.8%), and opioid-related withdrawal symptoms (51.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study indicate high acceptability for adopting MBI among patients prescribed buprenorphine in OBOT. Further research is needed to assess the efficacy of MBI to improve clinical outcomes among patients initiating buprenorphine in OBOT.

Wide Awake Trigger Finger Releases Performed in the United States: Trends in Volume, Operative Setting, and Reimbursement.

BACKGROUND: Trigger finger release (TFR) has traditionally been performed in outpatient operating rooms. More recently, TFR may be performed in the office setting to achieve greater efficiency and cost savings. METHODS: The 2010-2020 Q2 PearlDiver M91Ortho data set was analyzed for cases of TFR. Exclusion criteria were age less than 18 years, <30 days of postoperative records, concomitant hand surgery, monitored anesthesia use, and inpatient surgery. Age, sex, and Elixhauser comorbidity index were recorded. Operating room and office procedures were matched 4:1 based on patient characteristics. Total and physician reimbursement for the day of surgery, as well as 30-day narcotics prescriptions, emergency department (ED) visits, and surgical site infections (SSI) were determined. RESULTS: Before matching, TFRs were found to be increasingly performed in the office (from 7.9% in 2010 to 14.6% in 2020). Matched cohorts consisted of 63,951 operating room and 15,992 office procedures. Office procedures had lower mean total reimbursements ($435 vs $752, P < 0.001), slightly lower mean physician reimbursements ($420 vs $460, P < 0.001), and lower rates of narcotic prescriptions (30.5% vs 50.5%, P < 0.001) and 30-day ED visits (2.2% vs 2.9%, P < 0.05). There was no difference in 30-day SSI (0.5% vs 0.6%, P = 0.374). CONCLUSIONS: In-office TFR is becoming increasingly prevalent. After matching, in-office TFRs were associated with lesser costs to the system, lower narcotic prescriptions, and fewer postoperative ED visits, without increased SSI. Although it is important to perform procedures in the best location for the patient, physician, and system, the current study supports the increased value offered by in-office TFR.

Patient-Reported Quality of Recovery after Local Anesthesia versus Brachial Plexus Block in Hand Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Both local anesthesia (LA) and brachial plexus (BP) anesthesia are commonly used in hand surgery. LA has increased efficiency and reduced costs, but BP is often favored for more complex hand surgery, despite requiring greater time and resources. The primary objective of this study was to assess the quality of recovery of patients who received LA or BP block for hand surgery. Secondary objectives were to compare postoperative pain and opioid use. METHODS: This randomized, controlled, noninferiority study enrolled patients undergoing surgery distal to the carpal bones. Patients were randomized to either LA (wrist or digital block) or BP block (infraclavicular block) before surgery. Patients completed the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire on postoperative day (POD) 1. Pain level was assessed with a numeric pain rating scale, and narcotic consumption was recorded on POD1 and POD3. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients completed the study (LA, n = 46, BP, n = 30). No statistically significant difference was found for median Quality of Recovery-15 score between LA [127.5 (interquartile range, 28)] and BP block [123.5 (interquartile range, 31)]. The inferiority margin of LA to BP block at the 95% confidence interval was less than the minimal clinically important difference of 8, demonstrating noninferiority of LA compared with BP block. There was no statistically significant difference between LA and BP block for numeric pain rating scale scores or narcotic consumption on POD1 and POD3 ( P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: LA is noninferior to BP block for hand surgery with regard to patient-reported quality of recovery, postoperative pain, and narcotic use. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.

Narcotic Utilization After Cleft Lip Repair: Does Local Anesthetic Choice Matter?

To analyze whether the choice of intraoperative local anesthetic for cleft lip repair is associated with the amount of perioperative narcotic utilization.Retrospective cohort study.Hospitals participating in the Pediatric Health Information System.Primary cleft lip repairs performed in the United States from 2010 to 2020.Local anesthesia injected-treatment with lidocaine alone, bupivacaine alone, or treatment with both agents.Perioperative narcotic administration.During the study interval, 8954 patients underwent primary cleft lip repair. Narcotic utilization for unilateral (P < .001) and bilateral (P = .004) cleft lip repair has decreased over the last 5 years. Overall, 21.8% (n = 1950) of infants were administered perioperative narcotics for cleft lip repair, such that 14.3% (n = 1282) required narcotics on POD 0, and 7.2% (n = 647) required narcotics on POD 1.In this study, 36.5% (n = 3269) patients received lidocaine, 22.0% (n = 1966) patients received bupivacaine, and 19.7% (n = 1762) patients received both local anesthetics. Administration of any perioperative narcotic was significantly lower in patients receiving both lidocaine and bupivacaine than those receiving only lidocaine (P = .001, 17.5% vs 21.7%) or only bupivacaine (P < .001, 17.5% vs 22.9%). Narcotic utilization on the day of surgery was significantly lower in patients receiving both lidocaine and bupivacaine than those receiving only lidocaine (P < .001, 11.5% vs 15.1%) or only bupivacaine (P = .004, 11.5% vs 14.6%). Narcotic utilization on the first postoperative day was significantly lower in patients receiving both lidocaine and bupivacaine than those receiving only bupivacaine (P = .009, 5.9% vs 8.1%). CONCLUSIONS: In children undergoing cleft lip repair, local anesthetic combination of lidocaine and bupivacaine is associated with decreased perioperative narcotic use compared to lidocaine or bupivacaine alone.

A randomized, placebo-controlled study of magnetic acupuncture for supplementary analgesia after laparoscopic appendectomy in children.

PURPOSE: Magnetic acupuncture (MA) is a noninvasive technique potentially useful for postoperative pain reduction. While anecdotal case series have reported analgesic effects, this has not been systematically studied. We evaluated the analgesic properties of supplemental MA versus placebo and standard treatment in children who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). METHODS: Children age 2-18 years who underwent LA for acute appendicitis were recruited from 2018 through 2020. Standardized postoperative pain medication including Ibuprofen, Acetaminophen, and narcotics were given as needed. Patients were randomized to 3 groups: Group 1 had adhesive acupuncture magnets placed on 5 predetermined meridian points for 48 h. Group 2 had corresponding non-magnetic adhesive metal disks placed in the same locations. Group 3 received no supplemental treatment. Pain was measured every 4 h using a 1-10 Visual-Analog-Scale (VAS). Cumulative demand of as-needed pain medication was calculated. Patients and families were handed open questionnaires upon discharge assessing satisfaction with treatment. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients were randomized. Groups were similar in age and gender distribution. Differences of means of cumulative VAS scores were significantly lower for group 1 (8.0,SD5.2) compared to group 2 (12.8,SD4.4; -4.8[95%CI -7.1 to -2.5], p < 0.01), and group 3 (19.8,SD7.7; -11.8[95%CI -15.0 to -8.6], p < 0.01). Cumulative acetaminophen and ibuprofen use per patient during the entire hospital stay was lower for group 1 (1510 mg, 20 mg) than for group 2 (2950 mg, 1800 mg), and group 3 (6100 mg; 2300 mg), respectively. In contrast to groups 2 and 3, none of the patients in group 1 asked for narcotics. Patients were highly satisfied with MA. CONCLUSIONS: Supplemental MA after LA in children had a beneficial effect on the postoperative pain perception and on-demand use of analgesics that could not be explained by placebo mechanism. MA is a safe, simple, and effective adjunct to standard postoperative care. Further studies are warranted. TYPE OF STUDY: Prospective randomized, placebo-controlled trial LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.

The Cannabis-Dependent Relationship Between Methadone Treatment Dose and Illicit Opioid Use in a Community-Based Cohort of People Who Use Drugs.

Background: Methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) is an effective treatment for opioid use disorder. However, subtherapeutic dosing may lead to continued opioid use by failing to suppress opioid withdrawal and craving. Preclinical and pilot experimental research suggests that cannabinoids may reduce opioid withdrawal and craving. We sought to test whether the association between low methadone dose and illicit opioid use differs according to concurrent cannabis use patterns. Methods: Data for this study were derived from two community-recruited cohorts of people (≥18 years old) who use illicit drugs in Vancouver, Canada. We used generalized estimating equations to estimate the adjusted association between lower daily MMT dose (<90 mg/day) and daily illicit opioid use, testing for interaction between dose and daily cannabis use. Results: Between December 2005 and December 2018, 1389 participants reported MMT enrolment and were included in the study. We observed a significant interaction (p<0.01) between daily cannabis and lower MMT dose on concurrent daily illicit opioid use: lower MMT doses increased the odds of daily illicit opioid use by 86% (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=1.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.61-2.16) during periods of no or low-frequency cannabis use and by 30% during periods of daily cannabis use (AOR=1.30, 95% CI=1.01-1.67). Discussion: This study provides preliminary observational evidence that cannabis may mitigate some of the negative effects of subtherapeutic MMT dosing, guiding future clinical investigations into the safety and efficacy of cannabis and cannabinoids as adjunct treatment for MMT.

Comparing the safety and efficacy of intravenous naloxone administration in opioid-naive and opioid-tolerant hospitalized oncology patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare naloxone doses and clinical outcomes after emergency opioid reversal in opioid-naïve and opi-oid-tolerant inpatients. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, retrospective chart review. SETTING: Comprehensive cancer center. PATIENTS: In-patients who received ≥1 dose of intravenous naloxone for emergency opioid reversal between 2014 and 2018. METHODS: Patients were classified as opioid-tolerant based on opioid dosing history ≥60 morphine milligram equivalents/day for ≥7 consecutive days prior to naloxone administration. Response to naloxone was based on documentation of improvement in respiratory rate to >10 breaths/min or improved response to stimuli. OUTCOMES: Naloxone doses and clinical outcomes after naloxone administration. RESULTS: Ninety-three naloxone episodes (58 opioid-naive and 35 opioid-tolerant) in 80 unique patients were included. No differences between opioid-naïve and opioid-tolerant groups were found for naloxone mean starting doses (0.14 mg vs 0.19 mg, p = 0.35), total doses (0.50 mg vs 0.32 mg, p = 0.07), and response rates (74.1 percent vs 77.1 percent, p = 0.81). Naloxone adverse reactions were more frequent in the opioid-tolerant group than the opioid-naïve group (opioid withdrawal symptoms (OWSs): 14.3 percent vs 0 percent; increase in pain: 20 percent vs 8.6 percent, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In opioid-tolerant patients, naloxone total doses required and response rates were similar to opioid-naïve patients. Use of opioid dosing history to identify potentially opioid-dependent patients should be considered prior to naloxone administration to guide dosing and reduce the risk for precipitating OWSs.

Robot-assisted vs ultrasonography-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block vs local anaesthesia in urology: results of the UROTAP randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively analyse robotically administered transperitoneal transversus abdominis plane (robot-assisted transversus abdominis plane [RTAP]) compared with both ultrasonography-guided transversus abdominis plane (UTAP) and local anaesthesia (LA) with regard to pain control and narcotic use in patients undergoing robot-assisted prostatectomy (RARP) or robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). SUBJECTS/PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing RARP or RAPN were randomized in a single-blind 2:2:1 fashion to RTAP:UTAP:LA, with the study powered to evaluate superiority of UTAP to LA and non-inferiority of RTAP to UTAP. We compared time to deliver the block, operating room time, postoperative pain scores using the visual analogue scale, and intra-operative and postoperative analgesia consumption. RESULTS: A total of 143 patients were randomized and received treatment. There was no significant difference in patient baseline characteristics. UTAP did not demonstrate superiority to LA in terms of pain control. RTAP and LA were faster to administer than UTAP (time to perform block 2.5 vs 2.5 vs 6.25 min; P < 0.001). There was no difference in postoperative narcotic, acetaminophen, ketorolac or ondansetron requirements among the three groups (P > 0.05). The study was terminated early due to the unexpected efficacy of LA. CONCLUSION: This study showed that UTAP and RTAP do not provide superior pain control to LA. The efficiency, effectiveness, and ease of administration of LA make it an excellent option for first-line therapy for postoperative analgesia.

The Efficacy of Local Anesthesia for Postoperative Pain Control in Breast Augmentation Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation can cause severe postoperative pain; therefore, some surgeons perform wound infiltration with a local anesthetic solution. This study investigated the postoperative pain relief of local analgesics in breast augmentation surgery. METHODS: We searched three databases for randomized controlled trials evaluating the outcomes of local wound irrigation with local analgesics during or after breast augmentation surgery. The solutions included ropivacaine, bupivacaine, bupivacaine plus ketorolac. The control groups may be saline alone or no irrigation. Network meta-analysis was further employed based on the frequentist approach. Outcomes were reported as weighted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Comparisons between the interventions of our included studies revealed that only bupivacaine plus ketorolac (versus placebo) significantly reduced pain at 1 h postoperatively, as indicated by the visual analog scale pain score reduction of 2.22 (- 3.98, - 0.47). Other comparisons showed no significant differences. Moreover, three of the included studies reported postoperative medication use. Two of them reported that postoperative narcotic use was reduced, but the others did not report any such reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed possibility that local irrigation with bupivacaine plus ketorolac might reduce pain 1 h after surgery. In addition, local anesthesia might reduce postoperative narcotic use. However, due to the small number of included studies, the clinical benefits of local anesthesia in breast augmentation surgery require further confirmation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Hyperbaric Oxygen to Assist Adults With Opioid Use Disorder in Reducing Methadone Dose.

ABSTRACT: Opioid withdrawal symptoms can interfere with substance use disorder treatment goals. This study investigated the acceptability, feasibility, and treatment effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) as an adjunct to reduce withdrawal symptoms for adults initiating a medically supervised methadone dose reduction. Adults prescribed methadone for opioid use disorder were randomized into either a hyperbaric oxygen group (n = 17) or an attention control group (n = 14). The study site was an outpatient opioid treatment program in the northwestern United States. Participants were asked to attend five consecutive daily 90-minute HBOT sessions offered at 2.0 atmospheres absolute with 100% oxygen in a pressurized chamber. Treatment attendance and reported satisfaction were measures of acceptability and feasibility. Medication doses were tracked posttreatment at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months. Withdrawal symptoms were assessed at baseline and daily during the 5-day intervention period. After randomization, 13 (76.5%) followed through with medical screening and HBOT sessions, and of those, nine (69.2%) completed all five 90-minute HBOT sessions. At 3 months, the treatment group maintained, on average, a 4.3-mg methadone dose reduction compared with an average reduction of 0.25 mg for control group participants. Opioid withdrawal symptoms were reduced after Day 1 of HBOT by twice as much, on average, compared with the control condition. Satisfaction surveys found participants were generally satisfied with ease and comfort of the treatment. The evidence that HBOT is an acceptable, feasible adjunct warrants future trials to determine more conclusively effects on withdrawal symptoms associated with methadone dose taper.

Topical vancomycin reduces surgical site infections in patients subjected to craniotomy for primary brain tumor resection: A comprehensive cancer center experience.

BACKGROUND: Craniotomies for resection of neoplastic lesions are at increased risk for surgical site infections (SSIs) as compared to non-neoplastic pathologies. SSIs can be detrimental due to delay in pivotal adjuvant therapies. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of SSI in primary brain tumors, to analyze risk factors, and to evaluate effectiveness of topical vancomycin in reducing SSIs. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a National Cancer Institutedesignated Comprehensive Cancer Center. Patients with primary brain tumors (n = 799) who were subjected to craniotomy from 2004 to 2014 were included. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, use of topical vancomycin and clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Topical vancomycin was associated with a significantly lower rate of SSI (0.8%) compared to standard care (5%), ( p = 0.00071; OR = 0.15; 95% CI = 0.02 - 0.5). Narcotic use ( p = 0.043; OR = 2.24; 95% CI = 0.96 - 4.81), previous brain radiation ( p = 0.043; OR = 2.08; 95% CI = 1.02 - 4.29), length of hospitalization ( p = 0.01; OR= 1.04; 95% CI = 1.01 - 1.08), and 30 day re-operation ( p = 1.58 ×10 -10; OR = 15.23; 95% CI = 7.06 - 32.71) were associated with increased risk for SSI. CONCLUSION: Topical vancomycin effectively reduced the rate of SSI in patients subjected to craniotomy for primary brain tumor resection. Furthermore, preoperative narcotic use, previous head/brain radiation, length of hospitalization, and 30-day reoperation were associated with increased risk of SSI.

"I got a bunch of weed to help me through the withdrawals": Naturalistic cannabis use reported in online opioid and opioid recovery community discussion forums.

A growing body of research has reported on the potential opioid-sparing effects of cannabis and cannabinoids, but less is known about specific mechanisms. The present research examines cannabis-related posts in two large online communities on the Reddit platform ("subreddits") to compare mentions of naturalistic cannabis use by persons self-identifying as actively using opioids versus persons in recovery. We extracted all posts mentioning cannabis-related keywords (e.g., "weed", "cannabis", "marijuana") from December 2015 through August 2019 from an opioid use subreddit and an opioid recovery subreddit. To investigate how cannabis is discussed at-scale, we identified and compared the most frequent phrases in cannabis-related posts in each subreddit using term-frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) weighting. To contextualize these findings, we also conducted a qualitative content analysis of 200 random posts (100 from each subreddit). Cannabis-related posts were about twice as prevalent in the recovery subreddit (n = 908; 5.4% of 16,791 posts) than in the active opioid use subreddit (n = 4,224; 2.6% of 159,994 posts, p < .001). The most frequent phrases from the recovery subreddit referred to time without using opioids and the possibility of using cannabis as a "treatment." The most frequent phrases from the opioid subreddit referred to concurrent use of cannabis and opioids. The most common motivations for using cannabis were to manage opioid withdrawal symptoms in the recovery subreddit, often in conjunction with anti-anxiety and GI-distress "comfort meds," and to enhance the "high" when used in combination with opioids in the opioid subreddit. Despite limitations in generalizability from pseudonymous online posts, this examination of reports of naturalistic cannabis use in relation to opioid use identified withdrawal symptom management as a common motivation. Future research is warranted with more structured assessments that examines the role of cannabis and cannabinoids in addressing both somatic and affective symptoms of opioid withdrawal.

PCR combined with lateral flow immunochromatographic assay to differentiate the narcotic Mitragyna speciosa from related species and detect it in forensic evidence.

Plants in the genus Mitragyna (Rubiaceae) are used in traditional medicine because of their broad therapeutic activity. Four Mitragyna species, M. speciosa (Roxb.) Korth. (MS), M. rotundifolia (Roxb.) Kuntze (MR), M. diversifolia (Wall. ex G. Don) Havil. (MD), and M. hirsuta Havil. (MH), occur in Thailand. M. speciosa, commonly known as 'Kratom' in Thai, is the only narcotic species for which buying, selling, importing or possessing has been prohibited by law in Thailand and some other countries. Mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine, the major psychoactive compounds, are important in the treatment of opioid withdrawal. However, this species is used in traditional medicine to relieve pain and inflammation. Consequently, a rapid and easy technique for differentiating M. speciosa from closely related species is needed for routine forensic analysis. In this study, polymerase chain reaction coupled with lateral flow immunochromatographic assay (PCR-LFA) based on matK was developed for the detection of M. speciosa in forensic specimens. Duplex primers (MS-F-FAM, Ctrl-F-DIG and Ctrl-R-Biotin) were designed based on species-specific nucleotide indels observed exclusively in the matK sequences of M. speciosa. Positive results for M. speciosa are indicated by the clear presence of three black lines on the lateral flow cassette. Forensic samples were investigated, and the three black test lines indicating M. speciosa were observed for seven of eight specimens. PCR-LFA has been proven to be fast, easy and efficient for detecting the narcotic M. speciosa and could be developed as a rapid forensic diagnostic technique for other plants.

The Role of Acceptance and Change in Recovery from Substance Use Disorders.

Long-term recovery (LTR) from substance use disorders (SUDs) has been described as a complex process. It has been proposed that psychological mechanisms can influence the resolution of problematic substance using behaviors and may explain how and why a recovery process works. The aims of this narrative review were to (a) examine acceptance and change as an underlying mechanism in LTR from SUDs; (b) examine the practice of acceptance and change in the Narcotics Anonymous (NA) and Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) programs; and (c) present a conceptual model of self-acceptance and change in LTR from SUDs. Based on dialectical behavioral philosophy and mindfulness-based intervention, I posited that self-acceptance is an underlying mechanism that addresses the cyclical nature of shame, guilt, and SUDs; improves emotion dysregulation; psychological well-being; and activates a change process of recovery from SUDs. This article contributes to the field by presenting the opposing forces of acceptance versus change and their synthesis in promoting LTR from SUDs, and by discussing the practice of acceptance and change in the AA and NA programs.

Bupivacaine liposome use reduces length of post-anesthesia care unit stay and postoperative narcotic use following robotic inguinal herniorrhaphy.

In the current opioid crisis, multimodal analgesic protocols should be considered to reduce or eliminate narcotic usage in the postoperative period. We assess the impact of bupivacaine liposome used along with a standard analgesia protocol following robotic inguinal hernia repair. A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained data including robotic inguinal hernia repairs (IHR) by two surgeons in the United States was performed. Within a multimodal analgesic protocol, local anesthetic was administered intraoperatively. One group received a mix of bupivacaine and bupivacaine liposome (BL), and one received standard bupivacaine (SB). Recovery room and home opiate doses were recorded. Primary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) and postoperative medication requirements. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate. 122 robotic IHRs were included; 55 received BL and 67 received SB. Hospital LOS (hours) was reduced in the BL group (2.8 ± 1.1 vs 3.5 ± 1.2; p = 0.0003). There was no significant difference in recovery room parenteral MME requirements between the groups; however, BL group had less oral MME requirements (5.0 ± 6.5 MME vs. 8.1 ± 6.9 MME, p = 0.02). The BL group had a higher rate of zero opiate doses at home (44% vs 5%, p = 0.0005). Of those that did require opiates at home, there was a significant reduction in number of narcotic pills used by the BL compared to the SB group (median 1 vs 5, respectively; p < 0.0001). Intraoperative administration of BL as part of a pain management protocol may decrease length of hospital stay, and reduce or eliminate the need for narcotic analgesic use at home.

Opium and Cigarette Smoking are Independently Associated with Bladder Cancer: The Findings of a Matched Case - Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Bladder cancer disproportionally affects the communities. While it is the ninth most common cancer in the world, in some parts of Iran including Kerman province it is the most common cancer among men. This study aimed to determine potential risk factors of bladder cancer in Kerman province, Iran. METHODS: During February to July 2020, in this matched hospital-based case-control study, 100 patients with bladder cancer and 200 healthy individuals (matched in age and sex) were recruited. Socio-demographics status, occupational exposures, common diet, history of drug use and family history of cancer, were collected using a structured questionnaire. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression were applied and crude and adjusted odds ratios (AOR) along with their 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated. Data were analyzed using Stata version 14 software. RESULTS: Opium consumption, cigarette smoking and low level of income were associated with increased chance of bladder cancer. Compared to never use, use of opium up to 18000 Gram -year was associated with increased chance of bladder cancer (AOR: 6; 95% CI =2.3, 15.5). The chance was higher among those who used opium more than 18,000 Gram - year (AOR: 11.3; 95% CI =2.3, 15.5). In comparison with never smokers, the chance of bladder cancer increased among those who smoked up to 20 pack-year cigarette) (AOR: 3.4; 95%CI= 1.3, 8.9) and those who smoke ≥ 20 pack-year (AOR: 15.8; 95% CI= 5.9, 42.4). CONCLUSIONS: The observed strong dose-response association between opium consumption, cigarette smoking and bladder cancer highlights the need for extension of harm reduction programs especially in regions with high burden of disease.