Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 24(11): 1165-1172, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30362922

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that real-world treatment patterns of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) do not always follow evidence-based treatment recommendations such as those of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease, which recommends treatment escalation based on disease progression. This U.S. database study evaluated treatment patterns in patients with COPD, focusing on time to initiation of triple therapy using multiple inhalers. OBJECTIVES: To (a) estimate time from diagnosis to initiation of long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) monotherapy, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) dual therapy, or LAMA/LABA dual therapy; (b) estimate time to initiation of triple therapy from LAMA monotherapy and ICS/LABA or LAMA/LABA dual therapies; and (c) estimate the likelihood of patient progression to triple therapy. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of patients with COPD newly started on LAMA monotherapy, ICS/LABA, or LAMA/LABA therapy between July 1, 2010, and March 31, 2013, as identified in Humana's research database. Patients who were fully insured with commercial or Medicare Advantage insurance plans and were aged ≥ 40 years at index with at least 1 hospitalization, 1 emergency department, or 1 medical office visit claim with a COPD diagnosis in the pre-index year were included in the analysis. Time from diagnosis to initiation of index therapy and time to triple therapy after index therapy were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the likelihood of progression to triple therapy. RESULTS: Of 13,541 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD, 4,000 received LAMA monotherapy; 8,207 received ICS/LABA therapy; and 77 received LAMA/LABA therapy at index; mean time (± SD) from COPD diagnosis to initiation of triple therapy was 178 (± 134) days, 185 (± 130) days, and 252 (± 124) days, respectively. During the study, 28% (n = 1,130) of patients receiving LAMA monotherapy and 20% (n = 1,647) of patients receiving dual therapy (ICS/LABA, n = 1,615; LAMA/LABA, n = 32) progressed to triple therapy. Of the patients who progressed to triple therapy, 63% and 57% of patients receiving monotherapy and dual therapy, respectively, progressed in the 12 months after the index date. In the 12 months before initiation of triple therapy, approximately 50% of patients in the LAMA monotherapy, ICS/LABA, and LAMA/LABA therapy groups had an exacerbation. In the multivariable analysis, discontinuation of therapy, smoking history, and concomitant use of xanthenes and short-acting beta2-agonists were significant predictors of progression from index therapy to triple therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 25% of patients with COPD progressed to triple therapy within 12 months of initiating treatment with monotherapy or dual therapy. Exacerbations were reported in only 50% of these patients, indicating that the other 50% may have escalated to triple therapy for other reasons. Treatment discontinuation, smoking history, the use of a LAMA, and concomitant medication use were significant predictors of progression to triple therapy. DISCLOSURES: This study was a GlaxoSmithKline-sponsored collaborative research study (HO-14-16145). GlaxoSmithKline funded this study and had a role in study design, data analysis, data interpretation, and writing of this report. Stemkowski is a paid employee of Comprehensive Health Insights, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Humana and was contracted to conduct the study. No funding was provided to Comprehensive Health Insights for manuscript development. At the time of the study, Lane and Tao were paid employees of Comprehensive Health Insights. Stanford is an employee of and stockholder in GlaxoSmithKline.


Subject(s)
Bronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/drug therapy , Administration, Inhalation , Aged , Disease Progression , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Drug Therapy, Combination/standards , Drug Therapy, Combination/statistics & numerical data , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Female , Humans , Likelihood Functions , Male , Middle Aged , Nebulizers and Vaporizers/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 45(2): 115-120, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28153353

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: After the bronchodilator effect of magnesium was shown, the use of magnesium in treatment of asthma exacerbations became common. With the results of recent studies, the use of intravenous magnesium in severe asthma exacerbations took its place. We aimed to examine the effects of adding isotonic magnesium sulphate instead of isotonic saline into nebulised salbutamol on the Modified Pulmonary Index Score (MPIS) and the hospitalisation rate in moderate asthma exacerbations. METHODS: Our study population included 100 children age between 3 and 15 years with asthma admitted to emergency department due to moderate asthma exacerbations. The patients were randomised to placebo or magnesium, with 50 patients in each arm. All patients received 1mg/kg of systemic methylprednisolone at the beginning of treatment and thereafter received either nebulised salbutamol (0.15mg/kg/dose) and 1ml magnesium sulphate (15%)+1.5ml isotonic saline on three occasions at roughly 20min intervals (Magnesium group) or nebulised salbutamol (0.15mg/kg/dose) and 2.5ml isotonic saline mixture on three occasions at roughly 20min intervals (Placebo group). The MPIS of patients on 0th min, 20th min, 40th and 120th min were calculated and compared. The primary outcome was to compare MPIS values at the end of 120th min. RESULTS: Both groups have similar demographic, allergic characteristics and baseline MPIS scores. When the MPIS scores in the 120th min and admission rates in the 200th min, there was no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of nebulised magnesium sulphate in moderate asthma exacerbation as adjuvant treatment showed no benefit to standard treatment in our study.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Immunologic/therapeutic use , Asthma/drug therapy , Adolescent , Albuterol/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Disease Progression , Double-Blind Method , Emergency Medical Services , Female , Humans , Magnesium Sulfate , Male , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , Nebulizers and Vaporizers/statistics & numerical data , Placebo Effect , Treatment Outcome
3.
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol ; 48(1): 114-25, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25213370

ABSTRACT

Patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) or clinic with acute exacerbation of asthma (AEA) can be very challenging varying in both severity and response to therapy. High-dose, frequent or continuous nebulized short-acting beta2 agonist (SABA) therapy that can be combined with a short-acting muscarinic antagonist (SAMA) is the backbone of treatment. When patients do not rapidly clinically respond to SABA/SAMA inhalation, the early use of oral or parenteral corticosteroids should be considered and has been shown to impact the immediate need for ICU admission or even the need for hospital admission. Adjunctive therapies such as the use of intravenous magnesium and helium/oxygen combination gas for inhalation and for driving a nebulizer to deliver a SABA and or SAMA should be considered and are best used early in the treatment plan if they are likely to impact the patients' clinical course. The use of other agents such as theophylline, leukotriene modifiers, inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting beta2 agonist, and long-acting muscarinic antagonist currently does not play a major role in the immediate treatment of AEA in the clinic or the ED but is an important therapeutic option for physicians to be aware of and to consider initiating at the time of discharge from clinic, hospital, or ED to reduce later clinical worsening and readmission to the ED and hospital. A comprehensive summary is provided of the currently available respiratory pharmaceuticals approved for asthma and other airway syndromes. Clinicians must be prepared to use the entire spectrum of medications available for the treatment of acute asthma exacerbations and the agents that should be initiated to prevent worsening or additional exacerbations. They need to be familiar with the major potential drug toxicities associated with their use.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists/therapeutic use , Asthma/therapy , Muscarinic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Acute Disease , Animals , Combined Modality Therapy , Drug Therapy, Combination , Emergency Medical Services , Humans , Hyperbaric Oxygenation , Nebulizers and Vaporizers/statistics & numerical data
4.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol ; 4(5): 397-402, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24449682

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Budesonide is a potent corticosteroid commonly prescribed for management of inflammation in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The standard for prescribing budesonide is via impregnated nasal saline irrigation (INSI), although recently the mucosal atomization device (MAD) has emerged as a theoretically superior method of distributing medication into the sinuses. The MAD atomizes medication into small droplets and this is thought to enhance absorption and improve bioavailability. However, no studies have shown whether enhanced absorption and improved bioavailability of budesonide via MAD causes adrenal suppression. The objective of this study is to determine whether budesonide via MAD affects the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. METHODS: Twenty CRS patients were recruited from a tertiary rhinology clinic and randomized to take budesonide (1 mg) via MAD or via INSI twice a day for 60 days. The adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation test and 22-item Sinonasal Outcomes Test (SNOT-22) questionnaire were administered on days 1, 30, and 60 of the study. Plasma budesonide and cortisol levels were simultaneously quantified using a high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry technique. RESULTS: There was no indication of adrenal suppression in either group (n = 20) based on ACTH stimulation test results nor was there significant plasma budesonide levels detected in either group. Quality of life, as indicated by SNOT-22, did not differ between groups at 60 days (p = 0.404; 95% confidence interval [CI], -37.2 to 15.9), but SNOT-22 scores for patients using MAD did show statistically significant improvement at 60 days compared to baseline (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The MAD is likely a safe and effective method of delivering budesonide to the sinuses in the short term.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Budesonide/administration & dosage , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Administration, Mucosal , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/pharmacokinetics , Budesonide/adverse effects , Budesonide/pharmacokinetics , Canada , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Hydrocortisone/metabolism , Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System/drug effects , Male , Nasal Polyps/complications , Nebulizers and Vaporizers/statistics & numerical data , Pituitary-Adrenal System/drug effects , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Rhinitis/complications , Sinusitis/complications , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
5.
Pharm Res ; 19(3): 322-9, 2002 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11934240

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate micronized powder retention and detachment from inhaler surfaces following reproducible deposition by impaction, coupled with centrifugal particle detachment (CPD). METHODS: Micronized albuterol sulfate (AS) and beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) were aerosolized as dry powders and deposited by cascade impaction onto different contact surfaces. Drug detachment from the surfaces was characterized using CPD, coupled with HPLC assay and scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: Drugs which accumulated as aggregates on model surfaces detached with distinctive profiles for % remaining vs. applied centrifugal force; each profile showed reproducible values for the minimum force required to initiate drug detachment, Fyield. While differences occurred in the observed detachment profiles for different drugs and contact surfaces (polyacetal vs. aluminum), the deposited drug particle size had the most significant effect on these profiles, e.g., Fyield for AS (2.1-3.3 microm) was 383 +/- 12.7 microN compared with 18 +/- 13.8 microN for AS (4.7-5.8 microm). CONCLUSIONS: A technique was developed which enabled the experimental review, and subsequent data analysis, of the adhesive properties between different DPI construction materials and drug substances deposited from aerosol clouds. The technique appears to be of greater relevance to inhaler design decisions than earlier studies in the literature claiming to show differences in the adhesion of single drug particles to surfaces.


Subject(s)
Adhesives/chemistry , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical/methods , Powders/chemistry , Administration, Inhalation , Aerosols/chemistry , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical/statistics & numerical data , Nebulizers and Vaporizers/statistics & numerical data , Surface Properties
6.
Pharm Dev Technol ; 6(4): 521-30, 2001 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11775953

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of taste-masking excipients on in vitro and in vivo performance of a leuprolide metered-dose inhaler (MDI) suspension formulation. Taste-masking excipients (aspartame and menthol) were added to a leuprolide suspension MDI formulation. The leuprolide MDI formulation with the taste-masking excipients was characterized in terms of milling time, particle size distribution, dose delivery and uniformity, and drug absorption in dogs. The data were compared with a formula that did not contain taste-masking excipients. It was found that the longer milling time for the leuprolide suspension with the taste-masking excipients was required to obtain a similar particle size distribution compared with the formula without taste-masking excipients using a fluid energy mill. Although measurable differences in mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) and geometric standard deviation (GSD) were not observed between the two formulations, the percent of particles < or = 5 microns and the actuator retention for the formula with the taste-masking excipients were significantly different from the formula without taste-masking excipients using the Marple-Miller cascade impactor. Taste-masking excipients did not show a significant effect on valve delivery and through-can dose uniformity. However, the mean ex-actuator dose was 150.4 mg for the formula with the taste-masking excipients and 162.2 mg for the reference formula, respectively, indicating a significant difference. In tracheostomized dogs, both formulations showed comparable pharmacokinetic parameters including Cmax, Tmax, AUC0-12 and bioavailability (F%), indicating that the taste-masking excipients do not have an effect on lung absorption of leuprolide acetate. Therefore, inclusion of taste-masking excipients in the leuprolide MDI suspension formulation showed a significant impact on drug micronization, exactuator dose, and particle deposition pattern. Mechanistically, the unfavorable performance of leuprolide MDI in the presence of taste-masking excipients could be due to modification of the properties of the suspension itself and alteration of propellant evaporation following actuation.


Subject(s)
Drug Delivery Systems/instrumentation , Excipients/administration & dosage , Leuprolide/administration & dosage , Nebulizers and Vaporizers/statistics & numerical data , Taste/drug effects , Administration, Inhalation , Aerosols , Animals , Aspartame/administration & dosage , Aspartame/pharmacokinetics , Chemistry, Pharmaceutical , Cross-Over Studies , Dogs , Drug Delivery Systems/methods , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical/instrumentation , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical/methods , Excipients/pharmacokinetics , Intubation, Intratracheal , Leuprolide/blood , Leuprolide/pharmacokinetics , Lung/metabolism , Menthol/administration & dosage , Menthol/pharmacokinetics , Particle Size , Peptides/administration & dosage , Peptides/blood , Peptides/pharmacokinetics , Suspensions/administration & dosage , Suspensions/pharmacokinetics , Taste/physiology
7.
Health Bull (Edinb) ; 58(4): 336-9, 2000 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12813815

ABSTRACT

In a short term qualitative study exploring the impact that improvements to housing might have upon the health of household members, respondents perceived significant benefits of housing improvements for physical and mental health, and for both children and adults. There is a need for prospective research which monitors health and wellbeing before, during, and after housing improvement and which uses independent measures of health.


Subject(s)
Family Characteristics , Family Health , Health Status , Housing/standards , Adult , Child , Female , Fluoxetine/administration & dosage , Holistic Health , Humans , Male , Nebulizers and Vaporizers/statistics & numerical data , Scotland/epidemiology , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL