Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 186
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Int J Neurosci ; 134(9): 1019-1025, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38525692

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This research aimed to ascertain the effects of acupuncture at myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in combination with sling exercise therapy (SET) on the clinical recovery and cervical spine biomechanics in patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CRS). METHODS: Eighty patients with CSR were divided into Group A and Group B. Group A was treated with acupuncture at MTrPs, and Group B was treated with acupuncture at MTrPs combined with SET. The cervical spine function, pain level, cervical spine biomechanics and the occurrence of complications were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. RESULTS: After treatment, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores, Clinical Assessment Scale for Cervical Spondylosis scores, cervical forward flexion angle, posterior extension angle, left lateral flexion angle, right lateral flexion angle, left lateral rotation angle, and right lateral rotation angle of the Group B were raised, and the Neck Disability index, Visual Analogue Scale scores, and Neck Pain Questionnaire scores were reduced versus those of the Group A. The difference in complication rates between the two groups was not of statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Acupuncture at MTrPs combined with SET promotes functional recovery of the cervical spine, reduces pain, and improves cervical spine biomechanics in patients with CRS.


Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy , Cervical Vertebrae , Exercise Therapy , Radiculopathy , Spondylosis , Humans , Male , Female , Radiculopathy/therapy , Radiculopathy/physiopathology , Radiculopathy/rehabilitation , Middle Aged , Spondylosis/physiopathology , Spondylosis/therapy , Spondylosis/rehabilitation , Spondylosis/complications , Exercise Therapy/methods , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena/physiology , Combined Modality Therapy , Trigger Points/physiopathology , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Neck Pain/therapy , Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Neck Pain/physiopathology
2.
Physiotherapy ; 123: 56-68, 2024 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38290198

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Every second human will experience a phase of neck pain in their lifetime and a high rate of chronicity exists. Because of the complexity and multiple influencing factors, chronic pain conditions are associated with a long treatment and diagnostic process. This leads to a prolonged healing process and high costs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of myofascial release on the variables of pain and range of motion in patients with chronic neck pain. METHOD: Selection criteria were set to create a search algorithm for a systematic search in the databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, EBM Reviews, Medline, CINAHL, PEDro, and Science Direct. The risk of bias and the methodological quality was analyzed with the PEDro scale. RESULT: Ten randomized controlled trials, with 549 participants met the eligibility criteria. The methodological quality was ranked from good to excellent. The myofascial release showed a significant difference in pain (p =  0.03), rotation to the right (p =  0.05), and lateral flexion to the right (p =  0.04), compared to other treatment methods. No significant effect was found for improvements in pressure pain threshold. CONCLUSION: Modest effects are observed in pain reduction, suggesting potential benefits of myofascial release in managing chronic neck pain. Further research with standardized protocols and direct comparisons to established therapies is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of myofascial release efficacy. CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER: What does the meta-analysis add to the current literature.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Neck Pain , Range of Motion, Articular , Humans , Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Chronic Pain/rehabilitation , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Adult , Pain Measurement
3.
Somatosens Mot Res ; 41(1): 11-17, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36645811

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aims to examine the effect of deep tissue massage (DTM) on the myofascial trigger point (MTrP) number, neck range of motion (ROM), pain, disability and quality of life in patients with Myofacial pain syndrome (MPS). METHODS: The study involved patients with MPS between the ages of 20-57. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: the control group (n = 40) and the study group (n = 40). Transcutaneous Electrical Neuromuscular Stimulation (TENS), hotpack and ultrasound were applied to 40 patients in the control group. The study group was also administered DTM for 12 sessions in addition to TENS, hotpack and ultrasound applications. Neck pain and disability scale (NPDS) for a neck disability, universal goniometer for neck ROM, MTrP count using manual palpation, Short Form 36 (SF-36) for quality of life and severity of neck pain were evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS). All patients were evaluated before and after treatment. RESULTS: It was found that the DTM group has statistically more improvement than the control group for VAS, NPDS and SF-36. Moreover, although there was a significant improvement in favour of the study group for extension, lateral flexion, right rotation and left rotation in the neck ROM, there was no significant difference in flexion measurements between the study and control group. CONCLUSION: In addition to the traditional rehabilitation program, DTM is effective on neck ROM, pain, disability and quality of life. Therefore, DTM treatment is a safe and inexpensive treatment method that can be applied in patients with MPS.


Subject(s)
Fibromyalgia , Myofascial Pain Syndromes , Humans , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Trigger Points , Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Quality of Life , Pain Threshold/physiology , Myofascial Pain Syndromes/rehabilitation , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Massage , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Bodyw Mov Ther ; 31: 90-96, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35710228

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate and compare the effects of therapeutic exercise, therapeutic ultrasound and photobiomodulation on pain, functionality and recruitment pattern of motor units, after a rehabilitation protocol for seamstresses with neck pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All 36 female, randomly divided into three groups; i)exercise control group, ii)exercise and photobiomodulation group, iii)exercise and ultrasound group. The groups were composed of sewing machine operators with complaints neck pain. Clinical evaluations: Visual analog pain scale, questionnaires Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, and electromyographic evaluations of the sternocleidomastoid and upper trapezius muscles. All variables were compared before and after the protocol. For statistical analysis, the values of mean, standard deviation and standard error of the mean were used. The values obtained were compared using the One-Way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey, and Cohen's-d, with a significance coefficient of p < 0.05. RESULTS: In the Ultrasound and laser groups there was a greater tendency to improve pain (p < 0.0001) and size of the effect on pain reduction (ultrasound = d:1.99; photobiomodulation = d:1.81). Between groups, there was a significant difference in post-treatment for the onset of right trapezius (p = 0.024) in the exercise and photobiomodulation groups (p = 0.0347). The photobiomodulation group showed pre and post-intervention differences in the left trapezius maximum onset (p = 0.010). CONCLUSION: Interventions with photobiomodulation, ultrasound, and exercise assist to pain, function, and muscular activation in seamstresses with neck pain.


Subject(s)
Neck Pain , Superficial Back Muscles , Exercise Therapy , Female , Humans , Neck Muscles , Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Pain Measurement , Single-Blind Method
5.
J Bodyw Mov Ther ; 29: 286-290, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35248284

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Nonspecific neck pain (NNP) is a common idiopathic disorder in the general population that affects the trapezius muscle (TM) and blood supply, thereby compromising the fascial system. Myofascial reorganization (MR) is a physical therapy technique that can influence the dynamics of local fluids reducing excessive muscle tension and capillary constriction, and increasing local blood flow. This study aimed to investigate whether MR improves peripheral muscle oxygenation. METHODS: This was a quasi-experimental study with an intentional non-probability sample. Fifty participants (women: 36, men: 14) with and without NNP were assigned to either the experimental group (EG: n = 25, with NNP, subjected to MR) or the control group (CG: without NNP, no MR intervention). TM oxygenation was measured using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) before and after a single intervention. All participants were evaluated and reassessed after 10 min. RESULTS: The results revealed that immediately after 10 min of MR, the EG exhibited an increase in the oxyhemoglobin level of the medium fibers of the TM (0.72 ± 1.47 vs. -0.14 ± 1.33 mmol/dL, p = 0.01). In addition, functional disability (CG: 5.48 ± 5.58%/EG: 21.12 ± 7.73%) and neck pain were measured using the neck disability index. The pain pressure threshold (CG: 70.49 ± 32.29 kgf/EG: 51.08 ± 27.65 kgf) and pain intensity (CG: 0.76 ± 1.56/EG: 3.28 ± 2.35) were also measured. CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that application of MR for 10 min increases the tissue oxyhemoglobin level in the TM of the group with NNP compared to the CG without NNP.


Subject(s)
Myofascial Pain Syndromes , Superficial Back Muscles , Female , Humans , Male , Myofascial Pain Syndromes/therapy , Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Oxyhemoglobins , Pain Measurement , Pain Threshold
6.
Biomed Res Int ; 2021: 6886373, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34660797

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a 3-week rehabilitation programme focusing only on the cervical region, pain intensity, range of motion in the cervical spine, head posture, and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) functioning in subjects with idiopathic neck pain who did not report TMJ pain. DESIGN: A parallel group trial with follow-up. METHODS: The study included 60 participants divided into 2 groups: experimental: n = 25, 27-57 years old, experiencing idiopathic neck pain and who underwent a 3-week rehabilitation programme, and the control, n = 35, 27-47 years, who were cervical pain-free. At baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment in the experimental group and with a 3-week time interval in the control group, pain intensity, head posture in the sagittal plane, range of motion in the cervical spine, and TMJ functioning were evaluated. RESULTS: After 3 weeks of rehabilitation, there was a significant decrease in pain intensity, improved range of motion of the cervical spine and head posture, and improved clinical condition of TMJ in participants with idiopathic neck pain who did not report TMJ pain. CONCLUSION: The study suggested that idiopathic neck pain is associated with limited range of motion in the cervical spine, incorrect head posture, and TMJ dysfunction. Our data suggests that therapy focusing only on the cervical region may improve the clinical condition of the TMJ in subjects with idiopathic neck pain who do not report TMJ pain. These observations could be helpful in physiotherapeutic treatment of neck and craniofacial area dysfunctions. This trial is registered with ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN14511735.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/physiopathology , Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Temporomandibular Joint/physiopathology , Adult , Exercise Therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Massage , Middle Aged , Myofascial Release Therapy , Neck Pain/therapy , Posture , Range of Motion, Articular
7.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 44(2): 103-112, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33715788

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of ischemic pressure (IP) vs postisometric relaxation (PIR) on rhomboid-muscle latent trigger points (LTrPs). METHODS: Forty-five participants with rhomboid-muscle LTrPs were randomly assigned into 3 groups and received 3 weeks of treatment-group A: IP and traditional treatment (infrared radiation, ultrasonic therapy, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation); group B: PIR and traditional treatment; and group C: traditional treatment. Shoulder pain and disability, neck pain and disability, and pressure pain threshold (PPT) of 3 points on each side were measured before and after treatment. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis of variance indicated a statistically significant Group × Time interaction (P = .005). The PPT for the right lower point was increased in group A more than in groups B or C. Neck pain was reduced in group B more than in group C. Moreover, shoulder and neck disability were reduced in both groups A and B more than in group C. The PPTs of the left lower and middle points were increased in group B compared with groups A and C. The PPT of the left upper point was increased in group A more than in group C. There were significant changes in all outcomes in the 2 experimental groups (P < .05). No changes were found in the control group except in pain intensity, shoulder disability, and PPT of the left lower point. CONCLUSION: This study found that IP may be more effective than PIR regarding PPT, but both techniques showed changes in the treatment of rhomboid-muscle LTrPs.


Subject(s)
Myofascial Pain Syndromes/rehabilitation , Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Superficial Back Muscles/physiology , Trigger Points/physiology , Adult , Back Muscles/physiology , Humans , Male , Pain Measurement , Pain Threshold/physiology , Shoulder Pain , Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation
8.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 44(2): 95-102, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33431282

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to compare the immediate effects of a single session of dry needling (DN), myofascial release (MR), and sham DN on pressure pain threshold (PPT) and neck pain intensity in individuals with chronic neck pain. METHODS: This was a randomized trial with a blinded outcome assessor. Forty-four individuals with chronic neck pain and unilateral myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle (UTM) were randomized to receive DN (n = 15), MR (n = 14), or sham DN (n = 15). The PPT over the UTM (ipsilateral and contralateral sides) and the proximal head of the radius (ipsilateral and contralateral to the treated side) and neck pain were assessed immediately and 10 minutes after the intervention. RESULTS: There was no significant Group × Time interaction for PPT in the UTM on the treated side (F = 0.63, P = .641) or the contralateral side (F = 1.77, P = .144). However, there was a main effect of time on both the treated side (F = 4.917, P = .001) and the contralateral side (F = 4.70, P = .015), with DN and MR increasing PPT at the UTM. No significant Group × Time × Side interaction was found for PPT at the proximal head of the radius (F = 1.23, P = .276). Within-group analysis revealed a significant increase in PPT on the ipsilateral and contralateral sides in both DN and MR. Neck pain decreased after DN (P < .001), MR (P < .001), and sham DN (P = .008). CONCLUSION: A single application of DN or MR generated local and distant hypalgesic responses superior to placebo. Future trials are needed to examine whether these findings occur in long-term follow-ups.


Subject(s)
Manipulation, Osteopathic/statistics & numerical data , Myofascial Pain Syndromes/rehabilitation , Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Superficial Back Muscles/physiology , Trigger Points/physiology , Adult , Chronic Pain/therapy , Dry Needling , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pain Threshold
9.
Clin Rehabil ; 35(3): 378-389, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33076707

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of adding an Upper Cervical Translatoric Mobilization (UCTM) or an Inhibitory Suboccipital Technique (IST) to a physiotherapy treatment in the symptomatology and function of mechanical chronic neck pain patients. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Primary Care Center in Cornellà, Spain. SUBJECTS: 78 patients (64 women), with mean age (SD) of 59.96 (13.30) years with mechanical chronic neck pain were divided in three groups: control, IST and UCTM groups. INTERVENTIONS: All groups received 15 physiotherapy sessions for three weeks. The UCTM and IST groups added 5 minutes of the assigned technique during six sessions. MAIN MEASURES: Neck disability index (NDI) and numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) for neck pain were measured baseline, three-weeks and 15-weeks follow-up. RESULTS: NDI (SD) at baseline, three-weeks and 15-weeks were 11.62 (7.08), 9.65 (6.25), 7.58 (5.64) for the control group, 14.38 (6.92), 8.50 (6.11), 7.12 (4.98) for the IST group and 13.19(7.23), 5.35(6.10), 4.35(2.76) for the UCTM group. NPRS (SD) at baseline, three-weeks and 15-weeks were 58.69 (19.46), 45.19 (23.43), 44.58 (24.08) for the control group; 64.08 (19.26), 42.19 (19.69), 34 (21.14) for the IST group; and 67.65 (20.65), 36.23 (20.10), 39.85 (25.44) for the UCTM group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with no treatment, both forms of mobilization were associated with reduced disability at three weeks, and UCTM remained better than control at 15 weeks; there were no significant differences between the two mobilization groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02832232).


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain/rehabilitation , Musculoskeletal Manipulations , Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Primary Health Care , Range of Motion, Articular , Spain , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
10.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 43(4): 394-404, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32703613

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the short-term effects of myofascial induction on mechanosensitivity of upper limb nerves. METHODS: In this secondary analysis of a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study, 21 breast cancer survivors with stage I-IIIA cancer were randomly allocated to an experimental group (30 minutes of myofascial induction session) or placebo control group (unplugged pulsed 30 minutes of shortwave therapy), with a 4-week washout period between sessions that occurred in a physical therapy laboratory in the Health Science Faculty (University of Granada, Spain). Range of motion (universal goniometry), structural differentiation, symptoms (yes/no), and pressure pain thresholds (electronic algometry) were assessed during neurodynamic tests and attitude toward massage scale as covariate. RESULTS: An analysis of covariance revealed significant time × group interactions for range of motion in affected upper limb nerves (median, P < .001; radial, P = .036; ulnar, P = .002), but not for nonaffected upper limb nerves (median, P = .083; radial, P = .072; ulnar, P = .796). A χ2 or Fisher exact test, as appropriate, also revealed a significant difference (P = .044) in sensitivity for the affected upper limb ulnar nerve in the experimental group, whereas the rest of the assessed nerves (affected and nonaffected upper limb nerves) showed no significant changes in either the experimental or control groups (P > .05). An analysis of covariance revealed no significant interactions on pressure pain thresholds over the nerves for affected (all P > .05) and nonaffected (all P > .05) upper limb nerves. CONCLUSION: A single myofascial induction session may partially improve mechanosensitivity of median, radial, and ulnar nerves and yield positive effects on symptom mechanosensitivity, especially regarding the ulnar nerve in breast cancer survivors.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/rehabilitation , Cancer Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Shoulder Pain/rehabilitation , Therapy, Soft Tissue/methods , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Manipulation, Spinal/methods , Mechanoreceptors/physiology , Middle Aged , Neck Pain/etiology , Neural Conduction/physiology , Single-Blind Method , Spain , Ulnar Nerve/physiology
11.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 70(3): 394-398, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32207413

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of eccentric muscle energy technique versus static stretching exercises combined with cervical segmental mobilisation in the management of upper cross syndrome in patients having neck pain. METHODS: The randomised controlled trial was conducted at the Khan Kinetic Treatment Canada Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Centre, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from August 2017 to January 2018, and comprised patients of upper cross syndrome who were randomized into two equal groups using lottery method. Patients in Group-A were treated with eccentric muscle energy technique with cervical segmental mobilisation, while those in Group-B received static stretching exercises with cervical segmental mobilisation. Two sessions per week for 3 weeks were given to each patient who were analysed by measuring tragus-to-wall distance, visual analogue scale and neck disability index. Cervical passive range of motion was measured using inclinometer. Data was recorded at baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment. Data was analysed using SPSS 21. RESULTS: Of the 40 subjects, 20(50%) each were in the two groups. In Group-A mean age was 42.75±11.13 years. In Group-B, it was 40.50±9.14 years. Eccentric muscle energy technique and static stretching technique both showed significant results (p<0.05) for within group analysis, but comparison across groups showed non-significant results (p>0.05 each) on all parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Both the techniques used were found to be equally effective in decreasing pain, improving cervical range of motion and reducing neck disability.


Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy/methods , Muscle Stretching Exercises , Musculoskeletal Manipulations/methods , Neck Pain , Range of Motion, Articular , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Diseases/complications , Neck Pain/etiology , Neck Pain/physiopathology , Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Neck Pain/therapy , Pain Management/methods , Pain Measurement/methods , Recovery of Function , Treatment Outcome
12.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 70(2): 344-347, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32063632

ABSTRACT

Neck is one of the most common site of musculoskeletal symptom manifestations. An impaired spinal curvature is a common finding in patients with mechanical neck pain. A pre-post quasi experimental pilot study was conducted at Fauji Foundation Hospital from January- March 2017,in which 12 patients with mechanical neck pain and straightening of the cervical spine were included and treated for 7 consecutive sessions consisting of muscle energy techniques (MET) in combination with facet joint mobilization. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of MET and facet joint mobilization on spinal curvature and functional outcomes in patients with neck pain. Outcome measurement tools that were included comprised of pain severity, neck disability index (NDI), cervical lordosis which was measured via x-ray based posterior tangential method, goniometry for cervical range of motion (ROM) and modified sphygmomanometer dynamometry (MSD) for isometric muscle strength. A significant difference was observed in pre and post treatment scores for all outcomes (p<0.05); demonstrating an effective combination therapy in terms of improved spinal curvature, pain, disability, ROM and isometric muscle strength.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/physiopathology , Lordosis/rehabilitation , Musculoskeletal Manipulations/methods , Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Range of Motion, Articular , Zygapophyseal Joint/physiopathology , Adult , Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Lordosis/diagnostic imaging , Lordosis/physiopathology , Male , Manipulation, Spinal/methods , Neck Pain/diagnostic imaging , Neck Pain/physiopathology , Pain Measurement , Physical Therapy Modalities , Pilot Projects , Radiography , Spinal Curvatures/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Curvatures/physiopathology , Spinal Curvatures/rehabilitation , Zygapophyseal Joint/diagnostic imaging
13.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 121: 32-44, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31972276

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to evaluate a selection of major reporting aspects in manual therapy (MT) trials, before and after the publication of the CONSORT extension for nonpharmacological trials (CONSORTnpt) STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We randomly selected 100 MT trials published between 2000 and 2015 and divided them into a pre-CONSORTnpt (n = 50) and a post-CONSORTnpt (n = 50) group. We extracted data on relevant issues of internal validity, reliability, and description of interventions. Two authors extracted data independently. Percentages were used for descriptive analyses, and Fisher's exact test and the chi-square test were used for group comparisons. RESULTS: Six different types of MT interventions with up to 20 controls were analyzed. The most common populations/conditions studied were healthy subjects and subjects with lower back or neck pain. Over 70% of studies included multi-session interventions, and 42% of studies reported long-term followup. The only significant differences between groups were the inclusion of a flowchart diagram, the estimated effect size, precision descriptions, and the description of intervention procedures. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that trials in MT show poor reporting even after the availability of standardized guidelines.


Subject(s)
Guidelines as Topic/standards , Musculoskeletal Manipulations/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/standards , Research Report/standards , Chi-Square Distribution , Data Analysis , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Low Back Pain/rehabilitation , Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Quality Improvement , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Sample Size , Statistics, Nonparametric , Time Factors
14.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 101(5): 770-780, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31954696

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the differences between clinical effects of electroacupuncture and biofeedback therapy in addition to conventional treatment in patients with cervical myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic of a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty patients (N=50) aged 25-55 years of both sexes with chronic neck pain diagnosed with MPS (characterized by trigger points within taut bands) were randomly assigned to 2 equal groups of 25 individuals. INTERVENTIONS: The patients in electroacupuncture group were treated with standard acupuncture and concomitant electrical stimulation; those in biofeedback group received visual electromyography biofeedback therapy for muscle activity and relaxation. Both groups received the intervention 2 times a week for a total of 6 sessions. Basic exercise training and medicines were administered for all the patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain severity based on the visual analog scale (VAS), functional status using Neck Disability Index (NDI), cervical range of motion (ROM) using and inclinometer, and pressure pain threshold (PPT) using an algometer were evaluated before and at 3 and 12 weeks after the treatment. Primary outcome was defined as 20% reduction in the 3-month neck pain and dysfunction compared to baseline, assessed through the NDI. RESULTS: Fifty patients (39 women, 11 men) with a mean age (years) ± SD of 39.0±5.5 and neck pain duration (weeks) of 6.0±2.2 were analyzed. All parameters, except for PPT of the lower trapezius and paravertebral muscles were improved significantly in both groups, while baseline values were controlled. The primary outcome was achieved more significantly in the acupuncture group than in the biofeedback group: 20 (80.0%) vs 10 (40.0%); rate ratio=2 with 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19-3.36; number needed to treat (NNT)=2.5 with 95% CI, 1.54-6.58. Advantages of acupuncture over biofeedback were observed according to values obtained from the NDI, VAS, extension and left lateral-bending ROM, and PPT on the left upper trapezius after the last session of intervention until 3 months (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both electroacupuncture and biofeedback therapies were found to be effective in management of MPS when integrated with conventional treatment. However, intergroup differences showed priority of acupuncture in some parameters vs biofeedback. Thus, electroacupuncture seems to be a better complementary modality for treatment of MPS in the neck and upper back area.


Subject(s)
Back Pain/rehabilitation , Biofeedback, Psychology , Electroacupuncture , Myofascial Pain Syndromes/rehabilitation , Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Adult , Disability Evaluation , Electromyography , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Single-Blind Method , Visual Analog Scale
15.
J Bodyw Mov Ther ; 23(4): 901-907, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31733780

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effects of combining traditional physical therapy exercises with sensorimotor training on joint position sense, pain, muscle endurance, balance and disability in patients with chronic, non-specific neck pain. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized controlled trial. SUBJECTS: A total of 53 patients with chronic non-specific neck pain were randomized to either traditional or combined exercise groups. INTERVENTIONS: All patients received 12 sessions of supervised intervention 3 times per week. The traditional group performed traditional exercises, and the combined exercise group performed sensorimotor training in addition to traditional exercises. OUTCOME MEASURES: Joint position sense, pain, neck flexor muscle endurance test, 10 Meter Walk Test, step test, and the Neck Disability Index. RESULTS: The combined exercise group showed significantly greater improvement compared to the traditional group in joint position sense during extension, flexion, right rotation, the 10 m walk test with head turn, and the step test. Pain intensity, muscle endurance, and disability improved in both groups. Additionally, there was a higher degree of effect on muscle endurance in the combined exercise group compared to a moderate effect in the traditional group. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of sensorimotor training with traditional physical therapy exercises could be more effective than traditional exercises alone in improving joint position sense, endurance, dynamic balance and walking speed.


Subject(s)
Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Physical Therapy Modalities , Adult , Chronic Disease , Disability Evaluation , Double-Blind Method , Exercise Therapy/methods , Feedback, Sensory/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neck Muscles/physiology , Physical Endurance/physiology , Postural Balance/physiology , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology
16.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 42(2): 104-107, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31126520

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify the external and internal reliability and responsiveness of the validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of neck pain to a standardized regimen of physiotherapy administered acutely after mild whiplash injury using the clinically significant improvement components of the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) as the outcome measure. METHODS: Eighty-six patients with neck pain alone were referred for physiotherapy within 2 weeks of whiplash injury. They completed the Copenhagen, Northwick Park (NP), and Neck Bournemouth (NBQ) questionnaires and the Neck Disability Index (NDI) before starting and after treatment when they also completed the PGIC. Treatment comprised deep soft tissue massage, myofascial releases, muscle energy techniques, joint articulation and manipulation techniques, and a home exercise program. The duration of treatment was between 3 and 6 weeks. A PGIC of 6 or 7 was considered to be clinically significant improvement. RESULTS: The external reliability of the PROMs was >0.7 and internal >0.87. All components of the PROMs contributed to the final score except headache in the Copenhagen and upper-limb dysesthesia in the NP. The most reliable questionnaire was the NBQ, which was significantly more responsive than the Copenhagen (P = .008). The NBQ was slightly more responsive than the NDI and NP. The NBQ and NDI were successfully completed more frequently than the NP and Copenhagen. CONCLUSION: The NP, NDI, and NBQ are all reliable and responsive measures of change after physiotherapy for neck pain after acute whiplash injury.


Subject(s)
Disability Evaluation , Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Physical Therapy Modalities , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , England , Female , Humans , Male , Neck Pain/etiology , Reproducibility of Results , Wales , Whiplash Injuries/complications , Whiplash Injuries/rehabilitation
17.
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil ; 21(1): 45-55, 2019 Feb 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31019113

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pain of the spine and large appendicular joints may limit the functional mobility of elderly persons and affect their biological fitness. This paper assesses the effects of comprehensive physical therapy in women with lumbar and cervical pain and compares flexibility in the upper and lower body and the range of motion in selected joints. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-three women aged 60-75 years completed a 6-week intervention involving group gymnastics to prevent back pain, relaxation techniques, classic massage, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and ultrasound therapy to the lumbosacral and cervicothoracic regions. Patient outcomes were assessed by measuring upper and lower body flexibility, upper and lower extremity joint and spinal ROM, and self-reported back pain using a Visual Analogue Scale. Differences in means between successive measurements were calculated with a Student t test for dependent groups, while differences in the range of motion in the joints of the right and left limbs were calculated with the NIR test. RESULTS: The physical therapy significantly improved flexibility of the upper and lower body by increasing the range of motion in selected joints of the limbs and the spine. On completion of the intervention, the intensity of back pain was reduced by 2.9 points in the VAS scale. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The 6-week physical therapy programme desig-ned by us constitutes an effective therapy for pain relief in patients with degenerative changes of the spine. 2. The proposed combination of sonotherapy, elec-tro-therapy and classic massage procedures with general fitness exercises in low positions and au-to-genic training contributed significantly to im-provement in flexibility of the upper and lower part of the body and increasing the range of mo-tion in joints of the lower and upper extremities and the spine in women over 60 years of age. 3. The proposed set of procedures and exercises may be used in women over 60 years of age with the aim of improving selected components of biolo-gical fitness.


Subject(s)
Low Back Pain/physiopathology , Low Back Pain/rehabilitation , Neck Pain/physiopathology , Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Physical Therapy Modalities , Range of Motion, Articular , Aged , Exercise Therapy , Female , Humans , Massage , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation , Treatment Outcome
18.
BMJ Open ; 9(2): e025158, 2019 02 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30782926

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of neck pain is increasing rapidly with a high percentage of patients going on to experience recurrent or chronic symptoms. The resulting pain and disability are commonly managed using a variety of treatments including exercise. Resistance training exercise aimed at the neck and shoulders is advocated to treat chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP), however the dosage of prescribed exercise varies considerably between studies. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of resistance training in CNSNP and to determine an optimal dosage that should be prescribed in clinical practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review with qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis will be conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols. Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Excerpta Medica Database, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, PEDro, Zetoc, Index to Chiropractic Literature ChiroAcces, PubMed, grey literature sources and key journals will be searched. Randomised clinical trials investigating resistance training exercise in adults with CNSNP using outcome measures of pain and/or disability will be eligible for inclusion. Two reviewers will independently screen for eligibility, extract data and assess risk of bias (Cochrane risk of bias tool) with a third reviewer mediating in cases of disagreement. Data will be synthesised qualitatively to investigate intervention effectiveness and to determine the effect of exercise dosage on pain and disability. Meta-analysis using a random-effects model will be conducted where sufficient clinical homogeneity exists. The strength of the overall body of evidence will be assessed and reported using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study raises no ethical issues. Results will inform exercise prescription to improve management of CNSNP. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018096187.


Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy , Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Resistance Training/methods , Adult , Chronic Pain , Disability Evaluation , Humans , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Pain Measurement , Research Design , Systematic Reviews as Topic
19.
J Bodyw Mov Ther ; 22(4): 937-940, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30368338

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Upper trapezius trigger points are among the most common causes of neck pain. This study aimed to investigate the effects of integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition Technique (INIT) on pain intensity and threshold. MATERIALS & METHODS: Thirty two female participants with upper trapezius trigger points were recruited in this study. The participants were assigned to control (n = 16) or intervention (n = 16). The intervention group received INIT in one session, consisted of muscle energy technique, ischemic compression and strain-counter strain. Pain threshold and intensity were measured using Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) and Numerical Pain Scale (NPS). These measurements were performed at baseline, immediately after treatment and 24 h after treatment. FINDINGS: The results showed that pain intensity significantly decreased in the intervention group immediately after treatment (P = .01) and 24 h after treatment (P = .009) in comparison with the control group. There were no significant differences in pressure pain threshold between both groups. CONCLUSION: It seems that Integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition Technique can reduce pain intensity in patients with upper trapezius trigger points.


Subject(s)
Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Pain Threshold/physiology , Superficial Back Muscles/physiopathology , Therapy, Soft Tissue/methods , Trigger Points/physiopathology , Adult , Female , Humans , Pain Measurement , Single-Blind Method , Young Adult
20.
J Bodyw Mov Ther ; 22(4): 947-955, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30368340

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Narrative Review & Case Series. BACKGROUND: No "gold standard" test presently exists to confirm a diagnosis of cervicogenic dizziness, a condition whereby the neuromusculoskeletal tissues of the cervical spine are thought to contribute to imbalance and dizziness. Clusters of tests are presently recommended to provoke signs and symptoms of the condition. In this regard, dry needling may provide a valuable diagnostic tool. Targeting the musculoskeletal structures of the upper neck with dry needling may also provide a valuable treatment tool for patients that suffer from cervicogenic dizziness. While dry needling has been used to treat various musculoskeletal conditions, it has not been specifically reported in patients with cervicogenic dizziness. CASE DESCRIPTION: Three patients were screened for signs and symptoms related to cervicogenic dizziness in an outpatient physical therapy clinic. These patients presented with signs and symptoms often associated with (though not always) cervicogenic dizziness, including a positive flexion-rotation test, altered cervical range of motion, and tenderness with manual assessment of the upper cervical extensors. In addition, dry needling targeting the obliquus capitis inferior muscle was used diagnostically to reproduce symptoms as well as to treat the patients. OUTCOMES: Two of the patients reported full resolution of their dizziness and a significant improvement in their function per standardized outcome measures. While the third patient did not report full resolution of her cervicogenic dizziness, she noted significant improvement, and dry needling was helpful in guiding further treatment. Importantly, the effect of the treatment was maintained in all three patients for at least 6 months. DISCUSSION: This case series with narrative review covers various testing procedures for cervicogenic dizziness and explores the use of dry needling targeting the suboccipital muscles to evaluate and treat this patient population. The physiologic changes that occur in the periphery, the spine and the brain secondary to dry needling and their potential relevance to the mechanisms driving cervicogenic dizziness are discussed in detail.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/physiopathology , Dizziness/diagnosis , Dizziness/rehabilitation , Therapy, Soft Tissue/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Dizziness/physiopathology , Fascia , Female , Humans , Neck Pain/physiopathology , Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Needles , Postural Balance/physiology , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Trigger Points
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL