Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Laryngorhinootologie ; 96(6): 361-373, 2017 Jun.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28178740

ABSTRACT

Patients with residual hearing in the low frequencies and ski-slope hearing loss with partial deafness at medium and high frequencies receive a cochlear implant treatment with electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS, "hybrid" stimulation). In the border region between electric and acoustic stimulation a superposition of the 2 types of stimulation is expected. The area of overlap is determined by the insertion depth of the stimulating electrode and the lower starting point of signal transmission provided by the CI speech processor. The study examined the influence of the variation of the electric-acoustic overlap area on speech perception in noise, whereby the width of the "transmission gap" between the 2 different stimulus modalities was varied by 2 different methods. The results derived from 9 experienced users of the MED-EL Duet 2 speech processor show that the electric-acoustic overlapping area and with it the crossover frequency between the acoustic part and the CI should be adjusted individually. Overall, speech reception thresholds (SRT) showed a wide variation of results in between subjects. Further studies shall investigate whether generalized procedures about the setting of the overlap between electric and acoustic stimulation are reasonable, whereby an increased number of subjects and a longer period of acclimatization prior to the conduction of hearing tests deemed necessary.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/therapy , Hearing Tests/methods , Infant, Premature, Diseases/therapy , Audiometry, Evoked Response/methods , Audiometry, Evoked Response/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Germany , Gestational Age , Guideline Adherence , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/congenital , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/epidemiology , Hearing Tests/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, University/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature, Diseases/epidemiology , Neonatal Screening/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Utilization Review/statistics & numerical data
2.
Gesundheitswesen ; 79(5): 388-393, 2017 May.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26110244

ABSTRACT

Background: In recent years quality assurance has become an essential part of today's health-care system in the wake of the modern patient-oriented quality management. With the statutory introduction of newborn hearing screening (NHS) in 2009, a quality assurance of these early detection methods has become necessary. The aim of the study was to determine patient satisfaction in relation to the NHS in Saxony-Anhalt. Patients/Methods: During the period from November 2013 to April 2014, 394 parents were retrospectively interviewed about their experiences and expectations in relation to the NHS, using a standardised questionnaire. In total, 21 child care centres and 6 paediatric primary care centres from all over Saxony-Anhalt were involved. Results: It turns out that the majority of parents are satisfied with the NHS and 97.7% are in favour of the offer of an NHS. Of the surveyed parents, 69.3% felt the information as sufficient. However, only 66.2% of parents took a closer look at the leaflet issued by the G-BA. In addition, 17.7% of respondents are dissatisfied with the professional competence of the examining staff. Conclusion: The study shows that the general attitude among parents towards newborn hearing screening was very positive. They felt reassured by it although there are some aspects still open to criticism.


Subject(s)
Hearing Tests/psychology , Hearing Tests/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Neonatal Screening/statistics & numerical data , Parents/psychology , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Attitude to Health , Clinical Competence/statistics & numerical data , Germany/epidemiology , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Mass Screening/psychology , National Health Programs/statistics & numerical data , Neonatal Screening/psychology , Refusal to Participate , Young Adult
3.
Rev Salud Publica (Bogota) ; 16(3): 462-9, 2014.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25521960

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Assessing compliance with the section "Assessment of hearing" stipulated in the Technical Standard to Detect Alteration in children aged less than 10 years-old in Bogota. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study which involved reviewing the medical records of all children born between July 1st and December 31st 2010 in two healthcare institutions in Bogota. Records were selected in which any of the following risk factors appeared: neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia involving phototherapy, neonatal exposure to ototoxic substances and/or <1.500 gr low birth weight. It was also ascertained whether children had been referred to an auditory evoked potential test as the prescribed screening test for neonatal hearing, as stipulated in mandatory Colombian technical standards for detecting abnormal growth and developmental in children aged less than ten years-old. RESULTS: Neither of the two institutions was making the aforementioned referral test. DISCUSSION: The results indicated significant difficulties in adherence to the protocol for the early detection of hearing loss regarding pertinent/current neonatal Colombian regulations.


Subject(s)
Audiometry, Evoked Response/statistics & numerical data , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Neonatal Screening/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Audiometry, Evoked Response/standards , Child , Child, Preschool , Colombia , Cross-Sectional Studies , Early Diagnosis , Evoked Potentials, Auditory , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Neonatal Screening/methods , Neonatal Screening/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Referral and Consultation/standards
4.
J Perinatol ; 33(7): 499-504, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23429543

ABSTRACT

Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency, a common X-linked enzymopathy can lead to severe hyperbilirubinemia, acute bilirubin encephalopathy and kernicterus in the United States. Neonatal testing for G6PD deficiency is not yet routine and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends testing only in jaundiced newborns who are receiving phototherapy whose family history, ethnicity, or geographic origin suggest risk for the condition, or for infants whose response to phototherapy is poor. Screening tests for G6PD deficiency are available, are suitable for use in newborns and have been used in birth hospitals. However, US birth hospitals experience is limited and no national consensus has emerged regarding the need for newborn G6PD testing, its effectiveness or the best approach. Our review of current state of G6PD deficiency screening highlights research gaps and informs specific operational challenges to implement universal newborn G6PD testing concurrent to bilirubin screening in the United States.


Subject(s)
Glucosephosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency/diagnosis , Neonatal Screening/statistics & numerical data , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Erythroblastosis, Fetal/diagnosis , Glucosephosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency/epidemiology , Glucosephosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency/ethnology , Humans , Hyperbilirubinemia, Neonatal/diagnosis , Hyperbilirubinemia, Neonatal/epidemiology , Hyperbilirubinemia, Neonatal/prevention & control , Infant, Newborn , Kernicterus/prevention & control , Neonatal Screening/methods , Patient Education as Topic , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Assessment , United States/epidemiology
5.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 25 Suppl 4: 114-5, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22958038

ABSTRACT

The establishment of the Italian Pediatric Federation Newborn Hearing Screening Network and the Italian Society of Neonatology Infant Hearing Study Group is the result of an international collaboration between Parents and Medical Professionals in order to promote an effective model in developing Early Hearing Detection Intervention Programs that recognize the role of parents as partners in the process. Among other factors, one important component frequently underestimated in most early intervention programs, both in the USA and other countries, involves the role of parental involvement within the Early Hearing Detection Intervention (EHDI) process. When a parent receives the news of their child's hearing loss, reactions may include, but are not limited to denial, grief, guilt, shame, fear and impotency. A parent may begin to ask certain questions: How do we know if the professionals in our children's lives are capable, educated, trained, up to date in their chosen fields of expertise? Do they respect our children and us as parents? Do they understand the needs of children who are deaf or hard of hearing? A life-long health professional - parental collaboration begins at the moment of the diagnosis of that child. When analyzing the habilitation process of a deaf child, the relationship between health professionals and the crucial role of parents in raising that child is a 50-50 shared responsibility. An objective of EHDI programs must be to empower parents by providing support from the beginning of the process. Distributing informative literature regarding the newborn hearing screening process and providing parents with access to resources such as parental support groups upon diagnosis equips parents with the tools necessary to immediately begin advocating for their children. The Italian Federation Pediatric Audiology Network was created by combining the parental perspective and medical protocols in order to establish the roots for stronger EHDI programs.


Subject(s)
Cooperative Behavior , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/diagnosis , Motivation/physiology , Neonatal Screening/statistics & numerical data , Professional-Family Relations , Attitude to Health , Early Intervention, Educational , Hearing Loss/congenital , Hearing Loss/therapy , Hearing Tests/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/therapy , National Health Programs , Parents
6.
Rev Panam Salud Publica ; 29(3): 145-52, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21484013

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Ascertain the status of early hearing detection and intervention services in Latin America. METHODS: Between June and November 2007, Gallaudet University, in collaboration with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Diversity Committee, disseminated a survey to 11 Latin American countries. It included questions about newborn hearing screening (NHS) procedures, the availability of intervention services for infants with hearing loss, and challenges in identifying infants with hearing loss. In addition, a literature review was conducted to help identify the status of NHS efforts in Latin America. RESULTS: Six countries (Chile, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Mexico, Panama, and Uruguay) and one U.S. territory (Puerto Rico) responded to the survey. Responses indicated that efforts to identify infants with hearing loss vary within and across countries in Latin America. In some countries, activities have been implemented at a national level; in others, activities have been implemented at a single hospital or region within a country. Common barriers to implementation of NHS programs include a lack of funding, screening and diagnostic equipment, public awareness, and personnel qualified to work with infants and young children. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of several barriers, NHS programs have been implemented in at least some facilities and regions in Latin America. Additional efforts are needed to expand NHS activities in Latin America.


Subject(s)
Health Care Surveys , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Tests , Neonatal Screening , Audiology , Child Health Services/economics , Child Health Services/organization & administration , Child Health Services/supply & distribution , Early Diagnosis , Health Priorities , Hearing Aids/economics , Hearing Aids/supply & distribution , Hearing Loss/congenital , Hearing Loss/epidemiology , Hearing Loss/therapy , Hearing Tests/economics , Hearing Tests/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Latin America , National Health Programs , Neonatal Screening/economics , Neonatal Screening/legislation & jurisprudence , Neonatal Screening/statistics & numerical data , Workforce
7.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 56(2): 147-53, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21429080

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Hearing loss is the most common congenital condition screened for at birth in the United States, and more than 95% of newborns are currently screened for hearing. Newborn hearing screening is most effective when infants receive timely and effective interventions. Unfortunately, follow-up rates for newborns not passing their initial hearing screenings are as low as 50% in some states. Midwives are well-positioned to encourage families to follow-up with their neonatal providers when newborns are referred for further testing. Newborn hearing screening is a relatively new practice in the United States and, to date, there has been no research regarding the informational needs and practices of certified nurse-midwives or certified midwives related to hearing screening. This study examined the knowledge, attitudes, and follow-up practices of midwives related to newborn hearing screening and intervention. METHODS: A survey instrument was developed and sent to 5255 American College of Nurse-Midwives members in 50 states and 2 territories. RESULTS: Five hundred and eighteen surveys were returned, yielding a response rate of 9.9%. Only 68% of respondents said it was very important to screen all newborns for hearing loss. Respondents reported significant gaps in their knowledge about screening procedures, steps for referral, and the availability of resources when newborns did not pass the test. Midwives also reported the need for information about hearing loss conditions and genetics, screening guidelines, protocols for follow-up, referral networks, and therapies available. DISCUSSION: Current practices in newborn hearing screening and intervention programs can be enhanced by strengthening the basic midwifery knowledge of and rationale for follow-up when newborns fail their hearing screenings. Midwives can play an integral role in optimizing hearing, speech, and family interaction by assuring that each newborn has access to the best hearing screening and referrals.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Tests/statistics & numerical data , Midwifery , Neonatal Screening/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male
8.
J Clin Pathol ; 62(1): 46-8, 2009 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19103860

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To develop a strategy for neonatal screening of sickle cell disease (SCD) and effective enrollment of affected neonates in a comprehensive follow-up programme adapted to the socioeconomic conditions, health structures and cultural background of an African setting. METHODS: The strategy implemented at the two largest maternity services of Cotonou, the economic capital of the Republic of Benin, involves a team of specifically trained midwives, first to identify pregnant women at risk, and second to provide active and repeated information and sensitisation to these women to encourage voluntary demand for newborn screening and enrollment in the follow-up programme. RESULTS: Among the consecutive pregnant women studied (about 3000), 79.5% of the informed women at risk for fetal SCD asked for testing of their offspring, 85.2% of the newborns who tested positive were enrolled in the programme, and more than 80% were still being followed up after 5 years. The under-five mortality rate in this series was 15.5 per 10,000, a figure that is 10 times lower than the general rate recorded in the Republic of Benin. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that this specifically tailored strategy is relevant to this setting, given the unique conditions of this African country.


Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell/diagnosis , Neonatal Screening/organization & administration , Anemia, Sickle Cell/mortality , Benin/epidemiology , Developing Countries , Health Education/organization & administration , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Midwifery , Neonatal Screening/methods , Neonatal Screening/statistics & numerical data , Pilot Projects , Prenatal Care , Program Evaluation
9.
RCM Midwives ; 8(3): 116-8, 2005 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15790180

ABSTRACT

The objective of the pilot study was to test the appropriateness of an audit tool developed to determine the clinical effectiveness of midwives carrying out neonatal examination of the newborn. The audit was undertaken by reviewing retrospective data, collected from midwives' personal clinical records of neonates and the case records of the babies they had examined. The data was gathered over a period of 18 months, and included the records of 482 term babies. The setting was a district general hospital in the east of England. The participants were all midwives who had successfully completed the neurobehavioural examination of the newborn course, and practising at a local district general hospital. The findings of the study indicate that the audit tool was sufficiently robust to test the clinical effectiveness of midwives' detection of specific congenital abnormalities. Clinical effectiveness rates were reassuringly high. The study also began to highlight the positive impact on the improvement of the service available to women. A further study has been started to compare the clinical effectiveness rates between professional groups.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Tests, Routine/nursing , Infant Care/standards , Midwifery/standards , Neonatal Screening/nursing , Nursing Audit , Adult , Clinical Competence/standards , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/standards , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/statistics & numerical data , England , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Medical Staff, Hospital/standards , Neonatal Screening/standards , Neonatal Screening/statistics & numerical data , Nurse's Role , Nursing Methodology Research , Nursing Records/standards , Pilot Projects , Pregnancy
10.
Przegl Lek ; 62(7): 729-31, 2005.
Article in Polish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16463711

ABSTRACT

The authors present the investigations concerned the Iodine deficiency disorders (IDD) elimination in children living in South-East of Poland in last 15 years. To achieve the full success, what, as we know is possible, the monitoring and the exact control of the salt iodine supplementation according to the National Program of Iodine Deficiency Elimination (1999-2003) should be maintained. To avoid any negligence, the prompt education of the whole population is necessary, but yet especially the pregnant women. It is important to instruct them about the direct influence of iodine deficiency on the mental development of the fetus and the newborn.


Subject(s)
Congenital Hypothyroidism/epidemiology , Congenital Hypothyroidism/prevention & control , Iodine/deficiency , Neonatal Screening/statistics & numerical data , Sodium Chloride, Dietary/administration & dosage , Health Promotion/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Iodine/administration & dosage , Neonatal Screening/organization & administration , Poland/epidemiology , Preventive Health Services/organization & administration , Retrospective Studies
11.
Midwifery ; 19(4): 277-84, 2003 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14623507

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify current practices for the initial routine examination of healthy newborn babies, and determine the extent to which midwives are carrying out this examination. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Postal questionnaires were sent to consultant paediatricians and midwifery managers in all maternity units in England. Questionnaires were also sent to the 12 universities in England which run the N96 post-registration course in the examination of the newborn baby. FINDINGS: Questionnaires were returned from 197 (86%) maternity units. Senior house officers examined in 83% (160/193) a median of 92% of babies; 44% (74/167) had at least one midwife (median of two) with qualifications to carry out the examination and in 31% (51/167) some examinations were conducted by a midwife. However, a third of midwives with this qualification carried out no examinations, and nationally only about 2% of babies were examined by a midwife. Rates of referral by midwives and senior house officers were similar. Examinations were carried out between four and 48 hours from birth; most units considered six hours an acceptable minimum. An estimated 1% of babies were transferred home without routine examination; the GP was responsible for most (83-93%) of these babies' examinations; midwives for 10-23%; and senior house officers in hospital for 4-7%. Twelve per cent (23/194) of units carried out a second examination prior to discharge. Most respondents were in favour of midwives carrying out the examinations provided they were adequately trained. CONCLUSIONS: Many of the consultant paediatricians and midwifery managers stated that suitably trained midwives could routinely examine the healthy newborn baby; however, many currently N96 trained midwives were examining few or no babies. An extension of training would be needed were midwife examination to become general policy.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Tests, Routine/statistics & numerical data , Infant Care/standards , Midwifery/statistics & numerical data , Midwifery/standards , Neonatal Screening/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Anecdotes as Topic , Attitude of Health Personnel , Clinical Competence , Continuity of Patient Care/standards , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/standards , England/epidemiology , Family Practice/standards , Family Practice/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Medical Staff, Hospital/standards , Medical Staff, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Neonatal Screening/standards , Patient Discharge , Pediatrics/standards , Pediatrics/statistics & numerical data , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL