The Potential Value of Paraspinal Nerve Block (PVB) in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) Compared with General Anesthesia and Epidural Anesthesia.

Objective: To analyze the potential value of paraspinal nerve block (PVB) in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and to compare it with general anesthesia and epidural anesthesia. Methods: 120 patients undergoing PCNL surgery in Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital from January 2021 to June 2022 were selected and divided into PVB anesthesia group, general anesthesia group, and epidural anesthesia group according to different anesthesia methods, with 40 cases in each group. The anesthesia index (anesthesia operation time, anesthetic effect time, anesthesia time), the vital signs (heart rate, mean arterial pressure), postoperative pain [visual analog scale (VAS)], stress response index (cortisol and noradrenaline), the incidence of adverse reactions (nausea and vomiting, lethargy, dizziness, skin itching, bradycardia) were compared among the three groups. Results: The operation time of the anesthesia in the PVB anesthesia group was 5.72±1.25, which was significantly lower than that in the the general (7.95±1.15) and epidural anesthesia groups(8.23±1.43), and the differences were statistically significant (P = .000). The time of onset of anesthesia in the PVB anesthesia group was 6.63±1.87, which was significantly lower than that in the the general (9.84±2.41) and epidural anesthesia groups(10.14±2.89), and the differences were statistically significant (P = .000).The heart rate during percutaneous puncture and intraoperative lithotripsy in the PVB anesthesia group was statistically lower than in the general and epidural anesthesia groups (P < .05). The mean arterial pressure 20 minutes after anesthesia and at the end of operation in the PVB anesthesia group was higher than that in the general anesthesia group, and the mean arterial pressure during percutaneous puncture and intraoperative lithotomy was lower than that in the general anesthesia group (P < .05). The VAS scores of the PVB anesthesia group at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after the operation were lower than those of general and epidural anesthesia groups (P < .05). The incidence of adverse reactions was 5.00% (2/40) in the PVB anesthesia group and 35.00% (14/40) in the general anesthesia group, which was lower than that of 27.50% (11/40) in the epidural anesthesia group. (P < .05). Conclusion: The potential value of PVB in PCNL is high is better than that of general anesthesia and epidural anesthesia, anesthesia can shorten operation time and work time, extend the time of anesthesia to maintain, and be helpful to the intraoperative vital signs in patients with stable, mild postoperative pain and stress, low incidence of adverse reactions, efficacy and safety are good, can be introduced.

Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of PCNL and ESWL in Patients with Complicated Upper Urinary Tract Renal Calculi.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of combining percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for the treatment of patients with complicated upper urinary calculi. Methods: We employed a randomized controlled experimental design to examine data from patients diagnosed with complex upper urinary tract renal calculi at our hospital from April 2019 to March 2020. A total of 98 eligible patients were included in the study. To ensure the integrity of the research, we computerized and randomized the patient data according to the study's protocol. Subsequently, we divided the patients into two groups: a control group (n = 49) that received ESWL as the treatment modality and an experimental group (n = 49) that underwent a combined treatment approach involving both PCNL and ESWL. Following the completion of the treatments, we analyzed stone clearance rates and other outcome indicators. Additionally, we carefully documented any post-treatment adverse events to evaluate patient safety comprehensively. Results: The experimental group exhibited a higher stone clearance rate compared to the control group. Comparison of visual Analog Scale/Score (VAS) pain scores, operation time, and hospitalization time revealed statistically significant differences (P < .05), with the experimental group showing slightly worse performance than the control group. After treatment, both groups experienced varying degrees of complications, with the experimental group demonstrating fewer complications, a statistically significant result (P < .05). Conclusions: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy significantly improved stone clearance rates in patients with complex upper urinary tract renal calculi. Simultaneously, it positively impacted surgical outcomes and reduced the incidence of post-treatment adverse events. This intervention offers clinical benefits.

Outcomes of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Under Local Anesthesia: Outcomes of a Systematic Review of Literature.

Background: Several studies have reported on the safety and feasibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under local anesthesia (LA). The aim of this systematic review is to assess the perioperative outcomes of PCNL under LA. Methods: Three electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science, were searched for relevant English-language studies published from January 1980 to March 2023. The systematic review has been performed according to the Cochrane style and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. The primary outcomes include stone-free rate (SFR) and conversion to general anesthesia (GA). Secondary outcomes include postoperative complications. Results: Of 301 articles that were extracted, 42 full-text articles were selected, of which 36 were excluded, yielding a total of 6 articles in our results. A total of 3646 patients were included in this review. The SFR of PCNL under LA ranged between 69.9% and 93.3%. PCNL under LA was not tolerated by 19 (0.5%) patients: 6 patients had conversion to general anesthesia, 2 had conversion to epidural anesthesia, and 11 had their procedure terminated. The overall complication rates varied from 4.8% to 21% across studies. Grade I-II complications were reported in 2.4%-16.7% of cases, while grade III-IV complications were encountered in 0.5%-5% of patients. Conclusions: In this review, we found a few studies that examined the outcomes of PCNL under LA, which highlight the feasibility and safety of PCNL under LA and the low conversion rate to GA.

Minipercutaneous Nephrolithotomy Under Mixture of Local Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Objective: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of minipercutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) under mixture of local anesthetics (MLA) vs spinal anesthesia (SA) for management of large renal stones. Patients and Methods: This study was a prospective randomized controlled study and approved by IRB (REC-FOMBU). A total of 120 consecutive patients who met the inclusion criteria of the study and agreed to sign the informed consent form were randomized to undergo MPCNL under MLA (60 patients) or SA (60 patients). Intra- and postoperative findings including visual pain analogue scale (VAS), operative time, hospital stay, adverse events (AEs), stone-free rate, and related data were recorded. Results: Baseline characteristics and demography included age and gender; stone's site, size, and density were comparable for both groups (p > 0.05). The average VAS scores in the MLA group at 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours were 2.5, 0, 1, 1, and 0, respectively. The corresponding values in the SA group were 2, 1, 2, 2, and 1, respectively, (p < 0.05). The average operation time was ∼1 hour for both groups and the length of hospital stay was 1.5 days for both groups (p > 0.05). Whereas the mean hemoglobin deficit was 1.04% ± 0.54% vs 1.27 ± 0.46 (p = 0.013) and the primary postoperative stone clearance was 93.4% vs 88.3% (p > 0.05), for MLA and SA groups, respectively. Postoperative analgesic consumption and complications were similar in the MLA and SA groups. Conclusion: Single tract MPCNL is feasible under either MLA or SA with comparable stone clearance and AEs. Perioperative VAS was similar and acceptable for both modalities.

Comparison of Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (Mini PCNL) and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) for the Minimal Invasive Management of Lower Caliceal Stones.

PURPOSE:   To evaluate the stone-free rates, quality of life, complications, use of fluoroscopy, analgesic requirements, a hospital stay following the management of lower calyceal with two different techniques (Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery) in a prospective manner. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 50 patients with a diagnosis lower pole 1-2 cm stone were included into the study and were randomized into two groups.(Mini PCNL n: 25) ( RIRS n: 25). Safety and efficacy of both methods along with some other certain related factors were comparatively evaluated in both groups. RESULTS:  There was no significant difference between preoperative stone size, stone to skin distance, hemogram and creatinine values, need for analgesic drug, patients' replies to visual analog scale (VAS). The duration of both the hospital stay and the exposure to fluoroscopy, hematocrit decrease due to hemorrhage, complication rates were significantly higher in cases undergoing mini PCNL when compared to RIRS. Additionally, any significant difference was not observed with respect to the stone-free rates. Despite an increase in quality of life following the both type operations was noted; there was no significant difference in the quality of life between the patients in both groups. CONCLUSION:  Our findings demonstrated that both surgical techniques are the feasible alternatives in the minimal invasive treatment of lower pole stones. Although there was no meaningful difference in stone-free rates between two groups; complications, use of fluoroscopy, bleeding and duration of hospital stay were noted to be significantly higher in cases treated with mini PCNL.

The feasibility of multiple-tract mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy as an overnight surgery for the treatment of complex kidney stones.

To demonstrate the feasibility of applying multiple-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) as an overnight surgery for treatment of complex kidney stones. We reviewed a prospectively collected database of all multiple-tract PCNL planned as overnight surgery performed by a single surgeon since 2018. A clinical pathway including the removal of nephrostomy tube and discharge on the morning after surgery was carried out. A definition for tube removal was outlined. Ability to adhere to the pathway and achieving the described parameters and whether any resulting complications occurred were determined. A total of 136 consecutive patients were enrolled with mean stone burden of 960.5 mm2 and 5.1 cm. Mean operative time was 71.7 ± 30.7 min. The average hemoglobin drop was 17.6 ± 12.2 g/L, and the incidence of drop > 25 g/L was 21.9%. Overall, 125 patients (91.9%) but 11 patients were discharge on postoperative day 1. One case required readmission. Among the 11 patients, 7 patients (5.1%) underwent a delayed tube removal (≥ 2 days) and 4 patients underwent complications after next-day nephrostomy tube removal, including renal colic (2 cases), hydrothorax (1 case), and fever (1 case). Postoperative fever or severe hematuria was the major reason for delayed nephrostomy tube removal. The total complication rate was 8.8% (n = 12). Multiple-tract PCNL as an overnight surgery can be safely performed by experienced surgeons in most patients. An early nephrostomy tube removal could be achieved in nearly 95% patients.

Effectiveness of Aromatherapy for Relief of Pain, Nausea, and Vomiting after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting are common side effects of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Nowadays, non-pharmacological and complementary therapies have been noticed. Therefore, a study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of lavender and clary sage on the pain, nausea, and vomiting after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. METHODS: This is a randomized clinical trial study on 79 patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Patients were randomly divided into three groups of lavender aromatherapy (n = 27), clary sage aromatherapy (n = 26), and a control group (n = 26). Each of the intervention groups received the inhalation aromatherapy immediately and 3 and 6 h after the operation. Pain, nausea, and emetic episodes in patients of the three groups were measured before the intervention and 30 min after each intervention using a visual analog scale and checklist. RESULTS: Pain decreased significantly in the clary sage aromatherapy group. Nausea had a downward trend in the two groups of aromatherapy. The lavender aromatherapy group had the lowest incidence of emetic episodes compared to the other groups. CONCLUSION: Regarding the annoying pain, nausea, and vomiting after percutaneous nephrolithotomy for patients, and taking into account the complications of drug therapy, the use of complementary non-pharmacological methods can help increase the comfort of patients.

Ultra-Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones Sized between 10-20 mm in Children Younger Than 8 Years Old.

PURPOSE: With the invention of miniature devices, it has been advised to apply less aggressive methods for the management of upper urinary tract stones, especially in children. In the recent years, ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP) has been used for the treatment of upper urinary tract stones in order to perform surgeries with less complications and more acceptable outcomes. Results reported from different medical centers have been promising. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two children aged less than 8 years old with upper urinary stones sized between 10-20 mm underwent UMP. Inclusion criteria was solitary unilateral kidney stone, stone size between 10-20 mm, normal renal function tests, absence of any congenital malformations, and history of previous ESWL failure. Data including age, sex, side of kidney involvement, size of stone, location of stone, duration of surgery, duration of hospitalization, stone composition, need for blood transfusion, damage to adjacent organs, postoperative fever, septicemia after surgery, need for narcotics, further need for a complementary method, stone-free rate, pre and post-operative hemoglobin levels, and urinary leakage from the access tract were extracted from patients' medical files and were recorded. RESULTS: The mean age (± standard deviation) of children was 5.22 (±1.57) years. Fourteen (63.6%) patients were male. Fifteen (68.2%) renal stones were located in the right kidney, and 82% of patients had pelvis stones. 13 (59%) patients' stones were composed of calcium oxalate. Stone-free rate was 95.5%. In none of the cases urinary leakage, septicemia after surgery, injury to adjacent organs, and need for blood transfusions was reported. CONCLUSION: Ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy is an efficient and safe method for treating urinary stones sized between 10-20 mm in children.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Study Assessing Electroacupuncture for the Management of Postoperative Pain after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold standard procedure for large renal calculi but postoperative (PO) pain remains a concern. Modifications of the PCNL technique and intraoperative and PO strategies have been tested to reduce pain. PO pain control reducing risk of long-term pain medication and narcotic use is of considerable importance. Acupuncture is a common medical procedure shown to alleviate PO pain. Some benefits are that it is nonpharmacologic, easy to administer, and safe. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of electroacupuncture (EA) on PO pain in patients undergoing PCNL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study. The study was Institutional Review Board approved and performed under standard ethical guidelines. Fifty-one patients undergoing PCNL by a single surgeon were randomized to one of the three groups: true EA (n = 17), sham EA (SEA, n = 17), and no acupuncture (control, n = 17). The EA and SEA were performed by a single licensed acupuncturist <1 hour before operation. PCNL was performed without the use of intraoperative nerve block(s) or local anesthetic. Pain scores (visual analog scale [VAS]), narcotic use (morphine equivalents), and side effects were recorded at set intervals postoperatively. RESULTS: Mean VAS scores for flank and abdomen pain were lower at all time periods in the EA compared with the SEA and control groups. Mean cumulative opioid usage was lower in the EA group immediately postoperatively compared with both SEA and control groups. Two patients in the EA group did not require any PO narcotics. No differences between groups were found for PO nausea and vomiting. No adverse effects of EA or SEA were noted. CONCLUSIONS: EA significantly reduced PO pain and narcotic usage without any adverse effects after PCNL. This promising treatment for managing PO pain warrants further investigation.

The Effect of Local Anesthetic Agent Infiltration Around Nephrostomy Tract On Postoperative Pain Control After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebocontrolled clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Insufficient alleviation of pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy causes patient dissatisfaction and generates additional morbidity factors by preventing early mobilization. This study investigated the effects of bupivacaine infiltration with two different doses around the nephrostomy tract after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent subcostal single entrance percutaneous nephrolithotomy were randomly divided into 3 groups of 20 patients. While the first and second group were planned to receive bupivacaine at rates of 0.5% and 0.25% respectively, the third group was planned to receive a placebo agent to preserve the doubly blinded nature of the study. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was found in the number of patients using tramadole. The frequency of analgesic administration was found lower in the two groups that received bupivacaine in comparison to the group that did not, while the time of the first analgesic administration in the group that received high dose bupivacaine was significantly later than the other groups. Although there was no difference between the groups in terms of total amount of analgesic usage, patients who received higher concentrations of bupivacaine were likely to requirea lower amount of narcotic agent. The frequency of analgesic administration decreased significantly in patients of both groups that received bupivacaine. Moreover, by administering bupivacaine at a 0.5% rate, fewer patients (50%) required narcotic analgesia and the first time of analgesic administration was found to be significantly later. CONCLUSION: Administering bupivacaine at a 0.5% rate around the nephrostomy tract after surgery was demonstrated to be more effective.

Is mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy a safe alternative to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in pediatric age group in borderline stones? a randomized prospective study.

PURPOSE: The extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) remains the most common first line of treatment for renal stones in the pediatric population. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the outcomes of the ESWL and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 108 patients younger than 12 years of age with 1-2 cm single renal stone (pelvic or calyceal) were randomized into two groups, each containing 54 patients. Patients in group A were subjected to mini-PCNL using 16.5 Fr percutaneous sheath while those in group B underwent ESWL using Dornier Compact Sigma. RESULTS: The stone-free rate (SFR) after first session was 88.9% (48 cases) and 55.6% (30 cases) for groups A and B, respectively. The difference is highly statistically significant P = 0.006. Two patients (3.7%) in group A needed 2nd session of PCNL, while 18 patients (33.3%)in group B needed a 2nd session, of theses 18 patients six patients needed a 3rd session of ESWL. After the third session of ESWL and second look PCNL the stone-free rates were 92.59% (50 cases) and 88.89% (48 cases) for groups A and B, respectively, (P = 0.639), which is statistically insignificant. The mean hospital stay and fluoroscopy exposure were significantly longer in the mini-PCNL group. The complication rate in groups A and group B were (22.2%) and (14.8%), respectively, which is statistically insignificant (P = 0.484). CONCLUSIONS: According to Clavien grade of complications mini-PCNL is a safe procedure, and after three session of ESWL, mini-PCNL has a similar stone-free rate with a lower retreatment rate. However, the mini-PCNL has more radiation exposure, and requires a longer hospital stay.

The effect of nephrostomy tract infiltration of ketamine on postoperative pain and peak expiratory flow rate in patients undergoing tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Ketamine, as a systemic and local analgesic, has been used to reduce postoperative pain in many studies. The present study was designed to assess the analgesic efficacy of nephrostomy tract infiltration of ketamine in postoperative pain after tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Sixty-six patients with renal stone who were candidates for PCNL were randomized to two groups with 33 patients in each group. In group K, 20 mL saline solution containing 1.5 mg/kg ketamine was infiltrated into the nephrostomy tract and in group C, 20 mL saline solution was infiltrated into the nephrostomy tract at the end of surgery. The postoperative pain scores, sedation scores, time to first rescue analgesia, rescue analgesic requirement, peak expiratory flow rate (PEF), and hemodynamic parameters were compared between two groups. Sixty-six patients with a mean age of 45.29 ± 15 years and an age range of 18-60 years participated in this study. There was no significant difference in the demographic data and duration of surgery between the two groups. The mean VAS scores were significantly lower in the intervention group compared with the control group at the recovery, and 4 and 6 h postoperatively (p = 0.001). The mean time to first rescue analgesia in the postoperative period was significantly lower in the control group (64.5 ± 8.1 min) compared with the intervention group (122 ± 18.4 min). The trend of first opioid administration was significantly lower in the ketamine group p < 0.009. There was no significant differences in PEF between the two groups in the postoperative period (p = 0.622). In conclusion infiltration of ketamine into the nephrostomy tract provides superior analgesic and sedative effects in PCNL surgery without significant changes in PEF.