Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 44
Filter
Add more filters

Complementary Medicines
Publication year range
1.
Rev Chilena Infectol ; 36(5): 608-615, 2019 Oct.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31859802

ABSTRACT

The use of biological therapies has meant a great improvement in the management of several conditions like autoimmune, neoplastic or others diseases. Although its use has implied significant improvements in the prognosis of these diseases, it is not exempt from complications: infectious diseases as one of them. The objective of this consensus was to evaluate, from an infectious viewpoint, the safeness of the most frequently used biological therapies and give recommendations for the prevention of infections in patients treated with these drugs. These recommendations were based on the highest quality evidence available for the selected biologics. The consensus counts of two manuscripts. This first part details the risks of developing infectious complications depending on the type of biological used for a certain pathology. This evaluation included a broad search in MEDLINE and Epistemonikos of systematic reviews and meta-analyzes of controlled clinical trials and casecontrol examining post-treatment infections with anti-TNF alpha, anti-CD20, anti-CD52, CTLA4-Ig and anti-integrins. The research was complemented by a review of: multicentre cohorts of biological users, the MMWR of the CDC, Atlanta, U.S.A., and national registers and scientific societies in which infectious complications derived from the use of biological therapies were mentioned.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Biological Therapy/adverse effects , Communicable Diseases/chemically induced , Consensus , Biological Therapy/standards , Chile , Humans , Opportunistic Infections/chemically induced , Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
2.
Rev. chil. infectol ; Rev. chil. infectol;36(5): 608-615, oct. 2019. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1058087

ABSTRACT

Resumen La incorporación de terapias biológicas ha significado un gran avance en el manejo de diversas patologías de origen autoinmune, neoplásico u otros. Si bien su uso ha implicado mejoras significativas en el pronóstico de estas enfermedades, no está exento de complicaciones, entre estas, las infecciosas. El objetivo de este consenso fue evaluar el perfil de seguridad, desde la mirada infectológica, de las terapias biológicas de uso más frecuente y dar recomendaciones para la prevención de infecciones en pacientes tratados con ellas, basándose en la evidencia de mayor calidad disponible para los biológicos seleccionados. El consenso cuenta de dos manuscritos. Esta primera parte detalla los riesgos de desarrollar complicaciones infecciosas dependiendo del tipo de biológico utilizado para determinada patología. La revisión incluyó búsqueda amplia en MEDLINE y Epistemonikos de revisiones sistemáticas y meta-análisis de estudios clínicos controlados y caso/control que examinaban infecciones posteriores al tratamiento con anti-TNF alfa, anti-CD20, anti-CD52, CTLA4-Ig y anti-integrinas. Esta búsqueda se complementó con revisión de cohortes multicéntricas de usuarios de biológicos, del MMWR del CDC, Atlanta, E.U.A. y de registros nacionales y/o de sociedades científicas en la que se hiciera mención a complicaciones infecciosas derivadas del uso de biológicos.


The use of biological therapies has meant a great improvement in the management of several conditions like autoimmune, neoplastic or others diseases. Although its use has implied significant improvements in the prognosis of these diseases, it is not exempt from complications: infectious diseases as one of them. The objective of this consensus was to evaluate, from an infectious viewpoint, the safeness of the most frequently used biological therapies and give recommendations for the prevention of infections in patients treated with these drugs. These recommendations were based on the highest quality evidence available for the selected biologics. The consensus counts of two manuscripts. This first part details the risks of developing infectious complications depending on the type of biological used for a certain pathology. This evaluation included a broad search in MEDLINE and Epistemonikos of systematic reviews and meta-analyzes of controlled clinical trials and casecontrol examining post-treatment infections with anti-TNF alpha, anti-CD20, anti-CD52, CTLA4-Ig and anti-integrins. The research was complemented by a review of: multicentre cohorts of biological users, the MMWR of the CDC, Atlanta, U.S.A., and national registers and scientific societies in which infectious complications derived from the use of biological therapies were mentioned.


Subject(s)
Humans , Biological Therapy/adverse effects , Communicable Diseases/chemically induced , Consensus , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Biological Therapy/standards , Opportunistic Infections/chemically induced , Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Chile , Risk Factors , Risk Assessment
3.
Am J Transplant ; 19(6): 1831-1837, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30811872

ABSTRACT

In kidney transplantation, BK virus infection has historically resulted in high rates of graft dysfunction and graft loss. Unlike other opportunistic infections, no therapies have been shown to prevent BK. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ciprofloxacin for the prevention of BK viremia in kidney transplant recipients. Two hundred kidney transplant recipients were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing a 3-month course of ciprofloxacin (n = 133) vs placebo (n = 67) for the prevention of BK viremia. The primary endpoint of BK viremia at month 6 posttransplant occurred in 25 (18.8%) patients in the ciprofloxacin group and 5 (7.5%) in the placebo group (P = .03). Higher rates of BK viremia (23.3% vs 11.9%; P = .06) and BK nephropathy (5.8% vs 1.5%; P = .26) remained at 12 months in the ciprofloxacin group. Ciprofloxacin use was associated with a significantly higher rate of fluoroquinolone-resistant gram-negative infections (83.3% vs 50%; P = .04). A 3-month course of ciprofloxacin was ineffective at preventing BK viremia in kidney transplant recipients and was associated with an increased risk of fluoroquinolone-resistant infections. Clinical trial registration number: NCT01789203.


Subject(s)
BK Virus , Ciprofloxacin/therapeutic use , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Transplantation , Polyomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Female , Fluoroquinolones/therapeutic use , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Tumor Virus Infections/prevention & control , Viremia/prevention & control
4.
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 10(6): 759-66, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27029237

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patient populations face similar risks of chronic immunosuppression including corticosteroid use. We compared the receipt of preventive services between IBD and RA populations according to published quality metrics. METHODS: We defined a single-center cohort of patients with IBD or RA receiving specialty and primary care. Electronic health record abstraction assessed quality metrics, sociodemographics, comorbidity, and utilization. Comparisons used multivariate odds ratios and Student's t-tests. RESULTS: 218 RA and 190 IBD patients were included. In multivariate analysis, IBD patients were less likely to receive pneumococcal vaccination (OR=0.29, 95% CI: 0.11-0.85), while RA patients underwent glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis screening more often (100% vs. 82.5%, p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Gastroenterologists can improve care quality for IBD patients by assuming greater responsibility for preventive care in IBD patients and/or collaborating with primary care and health systems to improve preventive care delivery.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Guideline Adherence/standards , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Patient-Centered Care/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Preventive Health Services/standards , Process Assessment, Health Care/standards , Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards , Academic Medical Centers , Adult , Aged , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/immunology , Chi-Square Distribution , Comorbidity , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/standards , Electronic Health Records , Female , Gastroenterologists/standards , Glucocorticoids/adverse effects , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/diagnosis , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Opportunistic Infections/immunology , Opportunistic Infections/microbiology , Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Osteoporosis/chemically induced , Osteoporosis/diagnosis , Osteoporosis/prevention & control , Physician's Role , Pneumococcal Vaccines/therapeutic use , Primary Health Care/standards , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Wisconsin , Young Adult
5.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26487381

ABSTRACT

In December 2013 Bexsero® became available in Germany for vaccination against serogroup B meningococci (MenB). In August 2015 the German Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) endorsed a recommendation for use of this vaccine in persons at increased risk of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD). This background paper summarizes the evidence underlying the recommendation. Bexsero® is based on surface protein antigens expressed by about 80% of circulating serogroup B meningococci in Germany. The paper reviews available data on immunogenicity and safety of Bexsero® in healthy children and adolescents; data in persons with underlying illness and on the effectiveness in preventing clinical outcomes are thus far unavailable.STIKO recommends MenB vaccination for the following persons based on an individual risk assessment: (1) Persons with congenital or acquired immune deficiency or suppression. Among these, persons with terminal complement defects and properdin deficiency, including those under eculizumab therapy, are at highest risk with reported invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) incidences up 10,000-fold higher than in the general population. Persons with asplenia were estimated to have a ~ 20-30-fold increased risk of IMD, while the risk in individuals with other immune defects such as HIV infection or hypogammaglobulinaemia was estimated at no more than 5-10-fold higher than the background risk. (2) Laboratory staff with a risk of exposure to N. meningitidis aerosols, for whom an up to 271-fold increased risk for IMD has been reported. (3) Unvaccinated household (-like) contacts of a MenB IMD index case, who have a roughly 100-200-fold increased IMD risk in the year after the contact despite chemoprophylaxis. Because the risk is highest in the first 3 months and full protective immunity requires more than one dose (particularly in infants and toddlers), MenB vaccine should be administered as soon as possible following identification of the serogroup of the index case.


Subject(s)
Meningococcal Infections/immunology , Meningococcal Infections/prevention & control , Meningococcal Vaccines/administration & dosage , Meningococcal Vaccines/immunology , Adolescent , Child, Preschool , Germany , Humans , Infant , Male , Meningococcal Infections/transmission , National Health Programs , Opportunistic Infections/immunology , Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Opportunistic Infections/transmission , Risk Assessment , Treatment Outcome
6.
PLoS One ; 10(7): e0128522, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26186450

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sutherlandia frutescens (L.) R. Br. is widely used as an over the counter complementary medicine and in traditional medications by HIV seropositive adults living in South Africa; however the plant's safety has not been objectively studied. An adaptive two-stage randomized double-blind placebo controlled study was used to evaluate the safety of consuming dried S. frutescens by HIV seropositive adults with CD4 T-lymphocyte count of >350 cells/µL. METHODS: In Stage 1 56 participants were randomized to S. frutescens 400, 800 or 1,200 mg twice daily or matching placebo for 24 weeks. In Stage 2 77 additional participants were randomized to either 1,200 mg S. frutescens or placebo. In the final analysis data from Stage 1 and Stage 2 were combined such that 107 participants were analysed (54 in the S. frutescens 1,200 mg arm and 53 in the placebo arm). RESULTS: S. frutescens did not change HIV viral load, and CD4 T-lymphocyte count was similar in the two arms at 24 weeks; however, mean and total burden of infection (BOI; defined as days of infection-related events in each participant) was greater in the S. frutescens arm: mean (SD) 5.0 (5.5) vs. 9.0 (12.7) days (p = 0.045), attributed to two tuberculosis cases in subjects taking isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT). CONCLUSION: A possible interaction between S. frutescens and IPT needs further evaluation, and may presage antagonistic interactions with other herbs having similar biochemical (antioxidant) properties. No other safety issues relating to consumption of S. frutescens in this cohort were identified. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00549523.


Subject(s)
Fabaceae/chemistry , HIV Infections/virology , Isoniazid/adverse effects , Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Plant Leaves/chemistry , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/prevention & control , Administration, Oral , Adult , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , HIV Infections/blood , HIV Infections/diet therapy , HIV Infections/immunology , HIV-1/immunology , Herb-Drug Interactions , Humans , Male , Opportunistic Infections/immunology , Patient Safety , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/virology , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/immunology , Viral Load/immunology
7.
Support Care Cancer ; 23(3): 819-22, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25216851

ABSTRACT

Medicinal cannabis is an invaluable adjunct therapy for pain relief, nausea, anorexia, and mood modification in cancer patients and is available as cookies or cakes, as sublingual drops, as a vaporized mist, or for smoking. However, as with every herb, various microorganisms are carried on its leaves and flowers which when inhaled could expose the user, in particular immunocompromised patients, to the risk of opportunistic lung infections, primarily from inhaled molds. The objective of this study was to identify the safest way of using medicinal cannabis in immunosuppressed patients by finding the optimal method of sterilization with minimal loss of activity of cannabis. We describe the results of culturing the cannabis herb, three methods of sterilization, and the measured loss of a main cannabinoid compound activity. Systematic sterilization of medicinal cannabis can eliminate the risk of fatal opportunistic infections associated with cannabis among patients at risk.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Burkitt Lymphoma/drug therapy , Immunocompromised Host , Medical Marijuana/administration & dosage , Medical Marijuana/adverse effects , Nausea/prevention & control , Vomiting/prevention & control , Administration, Inhalation , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Aspergillosis/etiology , Aspergillosis/immunology , Aspergillus/isolation & purification , Cannabis/microbiology , Humans , Male , Nausea/chemically induced , Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Pain Management/adverse effects , Pain Management/methods , Phytotherapy/adverse effects , Phytotherapy/methods , Sterilization/methods , Vomiting/chemically induced , Young Adult
8.
Intern Med J ; 44(12b): 1283-97, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25482741

ABSTRACT

There is a strong argument for the use of antifungal prophylaxis in high-risk patients given the significant mortality associated with invasive fungal disease, the late identification of these infections, and the availability of safe and well-tolerated prophylactic medications. Clinical decisions about which patients should receive prophylaxis and choice of antifungal agent should be guided by risk stratification, knowledge of local fungal epidemiology, the efficacy and tolerability profile of available agents, and estimates such as number needed to treat and number needed to harm. There have been substantial changes in practice since the 2008 guidelines were published. These include the availability of new medications and/or formulations, and a focus on refining and simplifying patient risk stratification. Used in context, these guidelines aim to assist clinicians in providing optimal preventive care to this vulnerable patient demographic.


Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Hematologic Neoplasms/immunology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Opportunistic Infections/microbiology , Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Aspergillosis/prevention & control , Candidiasis/prevention & control , Consensus , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Guideline Adherence , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Patient Selection , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis/economics , Risk Assessment
9.
Intern Med J ; 44(12b): 1315-32, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25482743

ABSTRACT

Pathogenic yeast forms are commonly associated with invasive fungal disease in the immunocompromised host, including patients with haematological malignancies and patients of haemopoietic stem cell transplants. Yeasts include the Candida spp., Cryptococcus spp., Pneumocystis jirovecii and some lesser-known pathogens. Candida species remain the most common cause of invasive yeast infections (and the most common human pathogenic fungi). These guidelines present evidence-based recommendations for the antifungal management of established, invasive yeast infections in adult and paediatric patients in the haematology/oncology setting. Consideration is also given to the critically ill patient in intensive care units, including the neonatal intensive care unit. Evidence for 'pre-emptive' or 'diagnostic-driven antifungal therapy' is also discussed. For the purposes of this paper, invasive yeast diseases are categorised under the headings of invasive candidiasis, cryptococcosis and uncommon yeast infections. Specific recommendations for the management of Pneumocystis jirovecii are presented in an accompanying article (see consensus guidelines by Cooley et al. appearing elsewhere in this supplement).


Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/administration & dosage , Fever of Unknown Origin/microbiology , Immunocompromised Host/immunology , Opportunistic Infections/immunology , Opportunistic Infections/microbiology , Adolescent , Adult , Candidiasis, Invasive/immunology , Candidiasis, Invasive/prevention & control , Child , Child, Preschool , Consensus , Critical Illness , Cryptococcosis/immunology , Cryptococcosis/prevention & control , Drug Administration Schedule , Echinocandins/administration & dosage , Evidence-Based Medicine , Fever of Unknown Origin/immunology , Fluconazole/administration & dosage , Humans , Infant , Intensive Care Units , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Molecular Sequence Data , Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Pneumocystis Infections/immunology , Pneumocystis Infections/prevention & control , Pneumocystis carinii , Practice Guidelines as Topic
10.
Hematol Oncol ; 32(1): 31-9, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23625880

ABSTRACT

Oral mucositis (OM) is one of the side effects of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), resulting in major morbidity. The aim of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of the introduction of a specialized oral care program including laser therapy in the care of patients receiving HSCT with regard to morbidity associated with OM. Clinical information was gathered on 167 patients undergoing HSCT and divided according to the presence (n = 91) or absence (n = 76) of laser therapy and oral care. Cost analysis included daily hospital fees, parenteral nutrition (PN) and prescription of opioids. It was observed that the group without laser therapy (group II) showed a higher frequency of severe degrees of OM (relative risk = 16.8, 95% confidence interval -5.8 to 48.9, p < 0.001), with a significant association between this severity and the use of PN (p = 0.001), prescription of opioids (p < 0.001), pain in the oral cavity (p = 0.003) and fever > 37.8°C (p = 0.005). Hospitalization costs in this group were up to 30% higher. The introduction of oral care by a multidisciplinary staff including laser therapy helps reduce morbidity resulting from OM and, consequently, helps minimize hospitalization costs associated with HSCT, even considering therapy costs.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Low-Level Light Therapy , Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Oral Hygiene/methods , Stomatitis/therapy , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Allografts/economics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/economics , Antifungal Agents/administration & dosage , Antifungal Agents/economics , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/economics , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Brazil , Case-Control Studies , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Dentists/economics , Drug Costs , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/economics , Hospital Costs , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/economics , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Low-Level Light Therapy/economics , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Myeloablative Agonists/economics , Myeloablative Agonists/therapeutic use , Narcotics/economics , Narcotics/therapeutic use , Opportunistic Infections/economics , Opportunistic Infections/etiology , Oral Hygiene/economics , Parenteral Nutrition/economics , Patient Care Team , Retrospective Studies , Self Care/economics , Stomatitis/economics , Stomatitis/etiology , Stomatitis/prevention & control , Transplantation Conditioning/economics , Transplantation, Autologous/economics
11.
Wien Med Wochenschr ; 163(3-4): 73-9, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23361849

ABSTRACT

Aloe arborescens (Candelabra Aloe) has been used in the treatment of upper respiratory tract infections in Central and Eastern European countries for many decades. Originally introduced to support the healing and recovery in cornea transplant patients, aqueous A. arborescens extracts soon became popular in the treatment of upper respiratory tract infections with a focus on toddlers and children. Recent preclinical and clinical data show that immunomodulatory, antiinflammatory, and antiviral effects contribute to its therapeutic efficacy. Based on its well documented, longstanding traditional use and its excellent safety and tolerability, A. arborescens may be considered a valuable addition to the spectrum of herbal medicinal products for the treatment and prophylaxis of upper respiratory tract infections, in particular common cold, in adults and children.


Subject(s)
Aloe , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Medicine, Traditional , Phytotherapy/methods , Plant Extracts/therapeutic use , Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapy , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Opportunistic Infections/drug therapy , Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Respiratory Tract Infections/prevention & control , Secondary Prevention
12.
Acta Med Croatica ; 67(2): 165-70, 2013 Apr.
Article in Croatian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24471299

ABSTRACT

Patients on anti-TNFalpha medications carry a higher risk for developing opportunistic infections. In order to introduce anti-TNFalpha therapy, screening for hepatitis viruses B and C, HIV, EBV, HPV, TBC, bacterial, fungal and parasitic infections should be performed. Screening involves patient's history of earlier infectious diseases, vaccinations and traveling to parts of the world with endemic diseases. Clinical examination should be supplemented with stomatologic and gynecologic exams. Laboratory results include leukogram, transaminases, C-reactive protein, urine analysis, hepatitis B, C, HIV and EBV serology. Varicella zoster virus serology depends on past medical history. If the patient has traveled to tropical areas, both stool analysis and strongiloidiasis serology should be performed. Other mandatory examinations include chest radiography, PPD and TBC serology using interferon gamma release test (IGRA). If suspecting intra-abdominal abscess, magnetic resonance of the abdomen is recommended. In case of abscess, CMV or Clostridium difficile colitis anti-TNF-alpha therapy is contraindicated. Live vaccine application is contraindicated in patients receiving anti-TNFalpha therapy. All seronegative patients should be vaccinated against hepatitis B virus. Seasonal flu vaccination is recommended to be applicated yearly and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine once in every five years. Based on the past medical history and serologic results, patients are vaccinated against VZV with extra precaution. Human papilloma virus vaccination is performed in a group of women under 23 years of age, after gathering cervical smear sample analysis.


Subject(s)
Biological Therapy/methods , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Mass Screening/methods , Opportunistic Infections/diagnosis , Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Vaccination/standards , Female , Gastroenterology/standards , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Hepatitis C/prevention & control , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Male , Opportunistic Infections/chemically induced , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Virus Diseases/diagnosis
13.
Rheum Dis Clin North Am ; 38(4): 727-45, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23137579

ABSTRACT

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis are at higher risk for serious infections and death from infection than the general public. Prednisone and biologic agents increase this risk, although the risk associated with biologics can be mitigated when such agents act as prednisone-sparing therapies. Some of the important causes of infectious morbidity in this setting are preventable with screening (eg, tuberculosis) or vaccination (eg, herpes zoster).


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/epidemiology , Biological Therapy/adverse effects , Opportunistic Infections/epidemiology , Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Vaccination , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/adverse effects , Humans , Prednisolone/administration & dosage , Prednisolone/adverse effects , Risk Factors
14.
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg ; 106(4): 205-14, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22326691

ABSTRACT

Vitamin A deficiency (VAD) is an important public health problem worldwide that contributes significantly to the global burden of disease. Vitamin A deficiency disorders include xerophthalmia and increased risk of infectious diseases, both of which increase risk of mortality. Xerophthalmia is also a leading cause of preventable blindness. Areas with highly prevalent VAD often share common dietary and other environmental exposures, including poverty, infectious diseases, limited development and poor availability of vitamin A containing food. Globally, the prevalence of VAD has been declining, which may be due to widespread vitamin A supplementation in conjunction with measles immunisation in at-risk populations. Recent meta-analyses confirm that provision of vitamin A to children aged between 6 months and 5 years confers a significant mortality benefit. Further preventative measures for VAD comprise improving availability of vitamin A containing food, including foods biofortified with vitamin A. Ensuring vitamin A is available in any form in adequate quantities remains problematic, especially in areas affected by environmental catastrophes and conflict, and other areas where access to vitamin A containing foods and healthcare interventions is limited. Hence, it remains essential that maternal and child health workers remain vigilant for VAD in nutritionally vulnerable populations.


Subject(s)
Night Blindness/epidemiology , Opportunistic Infections/epidemiology , Vitamin A Deficiency/epidemiology , Vitamin A/therapeutic use , Xerophthalmia/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Developing Countries , Dietary Supplements , Female , Guidelines as Topic , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Infant , Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Infant, Newborn , Male , Night Blindness/diet therapy , Night Blindness/etiology , Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Pregnancy , Prevalence , Public Health , Risk , Vitamin A Deficiency/complications , Vitamin A Deficiency/diet therapy , Xerophthalmia/diet therapy , Xerophthalmia/etiology
15.
J Clin Invest ; 121(6): 2149-52, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21606604

ABSTRACT

Preclinical studies with probiotics continue to unravel mechanisms of cytoprotection and suggest that approaches utilizing microbial products as therapeutics in acute and chronic gastrointestinal disorders could be effective. However, clinical trials using these bacteria have thus far been inconsistent. In this issue of the JCI, Yan et al. describe a novel mechanism of cytoprotection by p40, a soluble product of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, mediated via EGFR. The efficacy of p40 in three models of chemically induced colitis indicates tremendous therapeutic potential, though this finding will need to be verified in human patients.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Proteins/therapeutic use , Gastrointestinal Diseases/therapy , Metagenome , Microbial Consortia/physiology , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Animals , Bacterial Proteins/administration & dosage , Bacterial Proteins/pharmacology , Colitis/chemically induced , Colitis/prevention & control , Colitis/therapy , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Enzyme Activation/drug effects , ErbB Receptors/drug effects , ErbB Receptors/physiology , Food Microbiology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/microbiology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/prevention & control , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/therapy , Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus/physiology , Mice , Microbial Interactions , Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Protein Kinases/drug effects , Protein Kinases/physiology , Recombinant Proteins/administration & dosage , Recombinant Proteins/pharmacology , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use
16.
J Nutr ; 141(6): 1101-7, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21525256

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to determine whether oral supplementation with EPA/DHA (10.5 and 5.1% of fat, respectively) could improve the outcome of pulmonary P. aeruginosa infection in cftr(-/-) mice compared with wild-type (Wt) mice similarly treated. Because gender could influence the susceptibility of cftr-deficient mice, results were analyzed by gender. Wt and (-/-) mice were randomized for 6 wk to consume a control or EPA/DHA diet, infected with endotracheal injection of 5 × 10(7) CFU/mouse of P. aeruginosa, and killed 24 h later. Cftr(-/-) mice were more susceptible to infection than were Wt mice; (-/-) males had more neutrophils (P < 0.01) and a higher keratinocyte-derived chemokine (KC) level (P < 0.05), and (-/-) females had greater lung injury and mortality (P < 0.05). Female (-/-) mice were more susceptible than (-/-) males with a higher mortality and lung injury (P < 0.05). The EPA/DHA diet reduced neutrophil numbers and KC and IL-6 levels (P < 0.05) in (-/-) males and reduced mortality rate (P < 0.001), lung permeability, and IL-6 level (P < 0.05) in (-/-) females compared with (-/-) mice fed the control diet. These results were associated with a reduction in the pulmonary bacterial load (P < 0.05), an increase in the EPA/DHA concentration in cell membranes of (-/-) males and females (P < 0.01), and an increased weight gain only in males compared with (-/-) mice fed the control diet (P < 0.01). In conclusion, EPA/DHA improves the host resistance of (-/-) mice, although the beneficial effect differed in males and females.


Subject(s)
Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator/deficiency , Cystic Fibrosis/diet therapy , Dietary Supplements , Fatty Acids, Omega-3/administration & dosage , Pneumonia, Bacterial/prevention & control , Pseudomonas Infections/prevention & control , Animals , Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid/immunology , Cystic Fibrosis/complications , Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator/genetics , Cytokines/metabolism , Disease Susceptibility , Female , Humans , Inflammation Mediators/metabolism , Lung/physiopathology , Male , Mice , Mice, 129 Strain , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Inbred CFTR , Mice, Knockout , Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Bacterial/microbiology , Pneumonia, Bacterial/physiopathology , Pseudomonas Infections/microbiology , Pseudomonas Infections/physiopathology , Sex Factors
17.
Br J Haematol ; 154(1): 76-103, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21517805

ABSTRACT

Supportive care plays an increasingly important role in the modern management of multiple myeloma. While modern treatments have significantly prolonged overall and progression free survival through improved disease control, the vast majority of patients remain incurable, and live with the burden of the disease itself and the cumulative side effects of treatments. Maintenance of quality of life presents challenges at all stages of the disease from diagnosis through the multiple phases of active treatment to the end of life. Written on behalf of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology (BCSH) and the UK Myeloma Forum (UKMF), these evidence based guidelines summarize the current national consensus for supportive and symptomatic care in multiple myeloma in the following areas; pain management, peripheral neuropathy, skeletal complications, infection, anaemia, haemostasis and thrombosis, sedation, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, constipation, diarrhoea, mucositis, bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis of the jaw, complementary therapies, holistic needs assessment and end of life care. Although most aspects of supportive care can be supervised by haematology teams primarily responsible for patients with multiple myeloma, multidisciplinary collaboration involving specialists in palliative medicine, pain management, radiotherapy and surgical specialities is essential, and guidance is provided for appropriate interdisciplinary referral. These guidelines should be read in conjunction with the BCSH/UKMF Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Multiple Myeloma 2011.


Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma/complications , Anemia/etiology , Anemia/therapy , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Complementary Therapies/methods , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Hemostatic Techniques , Humans , Jaw/drug effects , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Opportunistic Infections/complications , Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Osteonecrosis/chemically induced , Osteonecrosis/therapy , Pain/diagnosis , Pain/etiology , Pain Management , Pain Measurement/methods , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/etiology , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/therapy , Terminal Care/methods , Thrombosis/etiology , Thrombosis/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL