Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 56
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 102(5): 959-966, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33567336

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the short-term effects of dry needling (DN) on physical function, pain, and hip muscle strength in patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: A double-blind, placebo-control, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Private practice physiotherapy clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with unilateral hip OA (N=45) were randomly allocated to a DN group, sham DN group, or control group. INTERVENTIONS: Patients in the DN and sham groups received 3 treatment sessions. Three active myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) were treated in each session with DN or a sham needle procedure. The treatment was applied in active MTrPs of the iliopsoas, rectus femoris, tensor fasciae latae, and gluteus minimus muscles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physical function was assessed with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) physical function subscale, the timed Up and Go test, and the 40-meter self-paced walk test. Intensity of hip pain related to physical function was evaluated using the visual analog scale and WOMAC pain subscale. The maximal isometric force of hip muscles was recorded with a handheld dynamometer. RESULTS: Significant group by time interactions were shown for physical function, pain, and hip muscle force variables. Post hoc tests revealed a significant reduction in hip pain and significant improvements in physical function and hip muscle strength in the DN group compared with the sham and control groups. The DN group showed within- and between-groups large effect sizes (d>0.8). CONCLUSIONS: DN therapy in active MTrPs of the hip muscles reduced pain and improved hip muscle strength and physical function in patients with hip OA. DN in active MTrPs of the hip muscles should be considered for the management of hip OA.


Subject(s)
Dry Needling/methods , Muscle Strength/physiology , Osteoarthritis, Hip/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Hip/therapy , Pain Management/methods , Aged , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Walk Test
2.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage ; 29(3): 304-312, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33271331

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare assay sensitivity of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for global osteoarthritis pain and the Western Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) pain subscale, and the associated between-trial heterogeneity in effect sizes (ES). DESIGN: We included trials with placebo, sham or non-intervention control that included at least 100 patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis per arm, reporting both VAS and WOMAC pain scores. ES were calculated as between-group difference in means divided by the pooled standard deviation and compared using a paired t-test. ES and τ2 as a measure of between-trial heterogeneity were combined using random-effects meta-regression with robust variance estimation to account for the correlation of data within trials and meta-analyses. RESULTS: Twenty-eight trials with 44 randomized comparisons were included. In 28 comparisons (64%), ES from VAS favoured the intervention more than those from WOMAC pain (P = 0.003). Twenty-six p-values (59%) were smaller according to VAS (P = 0.008). The 44 comparisons contributed to 12 meta-analyses. Eleven meta-analyses (92%) showed larger benefits of interventions according to VAS, with a combined overall difference in ES of -0.08 (95% CI -0.14 to -0.02). τ2 was similar for VAS and WOMAC pain (difference in τ2, -0.003, 95% CI -0.009 to 0.004). CONCLUSION: The VAS for global pain had slightly higher assay sensitivity at trial and meta-analysis levels than the WOMAC pain subscale without relevant increase in between-trial heterogeneity.


Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis, Hip/therapy , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy , Pain Measurement/methods , Acupuncture Therapy , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Humans , Osteoarthritis, Hip/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Physical Therapy Modalities , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Viscosupplements/therapeutic use
3.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 20892, 2020 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33262447

ABSTRACT

This study designed to evaluate the effect of nutraceutical supplementation on pain intensity and physical function in patients with knee/hip OA. The MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Science direct, and ProQuest in addition to SID, Magiran, and Iranmedex were searched up to March 2020. Records (n = 465) were screened via the PICOS criteria: participants were patients with hip or knee OA; intervention was different nutritional supplements; comparator was any comparator; the outcome was pain intensity (Visual analogue scale [VAS]) and physical function (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis [WOMAC] index); study type was randomized controlled trials. The random effects model was used to pool the calculated effect sizes. The standardized mean difference (SMD) of the outcome changes was considered as the effect size. The random effects model was used to combine the effect sizes. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed by Cochran's (Q) and I2 statistics. A total of 42 RCTs were involved in the meta-analysis. Nutritional supplementation were found to improve total WOMAC index (SMD = - 0.23, 95% CI - 0.37 to - 0.08), WOMAC pain (SMD = - 0.36, 95% CI - 0.62 to - 0.10) and WOMAC stiffness (SMD = - 0.47, 95% CI - 0.71 to - 0.23) subscales and VAS (SMD = - 0.79, 95% CI - 1.05 to - 0.05). Results of subgroup analysis according to the supplementation duration showed that the pooled effect size in studies with < 10 months, 10-20 months and > 20 months supplementation duration were 0.05, 0.27, and 0.36, respectively for WOMAC total score, 0.14, 0.55 and 0.05, respectively for WOAMC pain subscale, 0.59, 0.47 and 0.41, respectively for WOMAC stiffness subscale, 0.05, 0.57 and 0.53, respectively for WOMAC physical function subscale and 0.65, 0.99 and 0.12, respectively for VAS pain. The result suggested that nutraceutical supplementation of patients with knee/hip OA may lead to an improvement in pain intensity and physical function.


Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements , Disabled Persons , Osteoarthritis, Hip/therapy , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy , Pain Management/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Osteoarthritis, Hip/complications , Osteoarthritis, Hip/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/complications , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Pain Measurement , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Visual Analog Scale
5.
Int J Rheum Dis ; 22(9): 1607-1615, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31328413

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials to examine the efficacy and safety of avocado-soybean unsaponifiables (ASU) in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA). DATA SOURCES: Medline, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched for randomized placebo-controlled trials. STUDY SELECTION: Original studies were randomized placebo-controlled trials evaluating the effect of orally administered ASU on knee or hip OA symptoms using the Lequesne index, visual analog scale (VAS) and/or joint space width (JSW). DATA EXTRACTION: Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model and generic inverse variance method. Heterogeneity was tested using the I2 statistic index. DATA SYNTHESIS: Avocado-soybean unsaponifiables therapy had a significant reduction on pain by VAS assessment (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -9.64 mm, 95% CI: -17.43, -1.84; P = .02; I2  = 92%). A subanalysis according to the type of OA showed that ASU significantly decreased both VAS and Lequesne index in knee OA (WMD: -17.36, 95% CI: -25.91, -8.82; P < .0001; I2  = 87% and WMD: -2.33, 95% CI: -2.88, -1.78; P < .00001; I2  = 18%, respectively) but not in hip OA. Finally, ASU supplementation showed no significant differences for adverse events compared to placebo (relative risk: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.83, 1.25; P = .88; I2  = 0%). CONCLUSION: Results of this meta-analysis suggest a beneficial effect of ASU treatment in symptomatic knee OA but not in hip OA. Additionally, adverse events were similar in patients receiving ASU therapy or placebo.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Osteoarthritis, Hip/drug therapy , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Persea/chemistry , Plant Extracts/therapeutic use , Plant Oils/chemistry , Soybean Oil/chemistry , Aged , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Antirheumatic Agents/isolation & purification , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis, Hip/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Plant Extracts/adverse effects , Plant Extracts/isolation & purification , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
6.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract ; 43: 76-82, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31352178

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dry needling (DN) in active myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) is effective to reduce pain, increase range of motion (ROM) and improve physical function in different musculoskeletal disorders. However, there is a lack of studies evaluating the effects of DN in active MTrPs in hip osteoarthritis (OA). OBJECTIVE: To determine the short-term effects of DN on pain, hip ROM and physical function in patients with hip OA. DESIGN: Double-blind randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Thirty patients with unilateral hip OA were randomized into two groups: DN group and sham group. Participants received three treatment sessions. The treatment was applied in active MTrPs of the iliopsoas, rectus femoris, tensor fasciae latae and gluteus minimus muscles. Pain intensity (visual analogic scale), passive hip ROM (universal goniometer and digital inclinometer) and physical function (30s chair-stand test and 20m walk test) were assessed at baseline and after the three treatment sessions. RESULTS: There was decreased pain intensity, increased hip ROM, and improved physical function following the DN treatment. These improvements were statistically significant (p < 0.05) compared to the sham group. The sham group had increased pain intensity and decreased hip ROM (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Pain, hip ROM, and physical function improved after the application of DN in active MTrPs of the hip muscles in patients with hip OA.


Subject(s)
Dry Needling , Osteoarthritis, Hip/therapy , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Hip/physiopathology , Pain Management/methods , Pain Measurement , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Trigger Points
7.
Complement Ther Med ; 42: 214-222, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30670244

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review was to identify the effects of non-pharmacological conservative treatment on pain, range of motion and physical function in patients with mild to moderate hip osteoarthritis. DESIGN: A systematic review based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. SETTING: We searched MEDLINE, PEDro, Scopus and the Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials related to non-pharmacological conservative treatments for hip osteoarthritis with the following keywords: "hip osteoarthritis," "therapeutics," "physical therapy modalities," and "combined physical therapy". The PEDro scale was used for methodological quality assessment and the Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine scale was used to assess the level of evidence. Outcomes measures related to pain, hip range of motion and physical function were extracted from these studies. RESULTS: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies showed high level of evidence and only two showed low level of evidence. High quality of evidence showed that manual therapy and exercise therapy are effective in improving pain, hip range of motion and physical function. However, high quality studies based on combined therapies showed controversy in their effects on pain, hip range of motion and physical function. CONCLUSIONS: Exercise therapy and manual therapy and its combination with patient education provides benefits in pain and improvement in physical function. The effects of combined therapies remain unclear. Further investigation is necessary to improve the knowledge about the effects of non-pharmacological conservative treatments on pain, hip range of motion and physical function.


Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis, Hip/therapy , Pain/physiopathology , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Conservative Treatment/methods , Exercise/physiology , Exercise Therapy/methods , Humans , Musculoskeletal Manipulations/methods , Osteoarthritis, Hip/complications , Osteoarthritis, Hip/physiopathology , Pain/etiology , Pain Management/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
8.
J Diet Suppl ; 16(4): 379-389, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29701488

ABSTRACT

This observational, open, multicenter clinical trial with a single treatment group aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a dietary supplement whose main ingredients are hydrolyzed gelatin, chondroitin sulfate, glucosamine sulfate, and devil's claw and bamboo extracts for pain reduction and improvement of functional capacities in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee and/or hip (REDART study). In all, 130 patients with OA recruited from Spanish hospitals received the dietary supplement for 6 months. The primary outcome was the patients' global assessment of pain in the affected joint as measured with a visual analogue scale (VAS). Other outcome measurements included the Lequesne Functional Index (subindexes for pain/discomfort, distance walked, and daily living) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC; subindexes for pain, stiffness, and physical function). Scores were taken at months 3 and 6 of the treatment. Patients (N = 78) showed a reduction of pain of 3.77 ± 1.77 points after 6 months (p < .0001) in the VAS. The total reduction in the Lequesne Functional Index was 6.30 ± 4.08 points after 6 months (p < .0001), with significant reductions in all subindexes of the scale. A similar pattern was found for the WOMAC index, with an overall reduction of 22.49 ± 14.03 points after 6 months (p < .0001) and significant reductions in all subindexes. No major adverse events were noted during the treatment. This exploratory study shows that treatment with the dietary supplement significantly reduces pain and improves locomotor function in patients with OA of the knee and/or hip.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/administration & dosage , Chondroitin Sulfates/administration & dosage , Collagen/administration & dosage , Glucosamine/administration & dosage , Osteoarthritis/drug therapy , Osteoarthritis/physiopathology , Aged , Dietary Supplements , Female , Humans , Locomotion/drug effects , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Hip/drug therapy , Osteoarthritis, Hip/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Pain Measurement , Spain , Treatment Outcome
9.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil ; 96(11): 773-792, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28323761

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of land-based generic physical activity interventions on pain, physical function, and physical performance in individuals with hip/knee osteoarthritis, when compared with a control group that received no intervention, minimal intervention, or usual care. METHODS: A systematic search for randomized controlled trials on 11 electronic databases (from their inception up until April 30, 2016) identified 27 relevant articles. According to the compendium of physical activities, interventions were categorized into: recreational activities (tai chi/Baduajin-6 articles), walking (9 articles), and conditioning exercise (12 articles). RESULTS: Meta-analysis for recreational activity (n = 3) demonstrated significant mean difference (MD) of -9.56 (95% confidence interval [CI], -13.95 to -5.17) for physical function (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) at 3 mos from randomization. Pooled estimate for walking intervention was not significant for pain intensity and physical performance but was significant for physical function (n = 2) with a MD of -10.38 (95% CI, -12.27 to -8.48) at 6 mos. Meta-analysis for conditioning exercise was significant for physical function (n = 3) with a MD of -3.74 (95% CI, -5.70 to -1.78) and physical performance (6-minute walk test) with a MD of 42.72 m (95% CI, 27.78, 57.66) at 6 mos. The timed stair-climbing test (n = 2) demonstrated a significant effect at 18 mos with a MD of -0.49 secs (95% CI, -0.75 to -0.23). CONCLUSION: Very limited evidence to support recreational activity and walking intervention was found for knee osteoarthritis, in the short-term on pain and physical function, respectively.


Subject(s)
Arthralgia/rehabilitation , Exercise Therapy/methods , Exercise/physiology , Osteoarthritis, Hip/rehabilitation , Osteoarthritis, Knee/rehabilitation , Aged , Arthralgia/etiology , Arthralgia/physiopathology , Environment , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Hip/complications , Osteoarthritis, Hip/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/complications , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Recreation Therapy/methods , Tai Ji , Treatment Outcome , Walking
10.
Eur J Endocrinol ; 174(3): 325-33, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26783348

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Adults with X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH) may suffer from skeletal symptoms leading to functional disability. No data on their quality of life (QoL) have been reported so far. Our objectives were to evaluate the QoL and its determinants in XLH adults. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in XLH adults, who consulted for musculoskeletal symptoms between 2013 and 2014. We assessed their QoL using HAQ, RAPID3 and SF36, and analysed the variables associated with low QoL. We compared their QoL to that of patients affected with axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA) (paired on age and gender), a rheumatologic disorder with a known low QoL. RESULTS: Fifty-two XLH adults (37 women (71.1%); mean age 41.8±13.3 years) were included; 44 (84.6%) patients had an altered QoL. Increased age and presence of structural lesions were significantly associated with worse QoL (HAQ, RAPID3) (P<0.05). Presence of enthesopathies was significantly associated with worse RAPID3 (OR=4.45 (1.09-18.29), P=0.038). Treatment with phosphate supplements and vitamin D in XLH adults were significantly associated with a better SF36-mental component score (OR=0.14 (0.03-0.57), P=0.007 and OR=0.26 (0.07-0.98), P=0.047 respectively). QoL was significantly worse in XLH than in ax-SpA adults (VAS pain, SF36-PCS, RAPID3) (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Our study showed i) QoL of XLH adults is altered and significantly worse than that of ax-SpA patients (VAS pain, SF36-PCS and RAPID3), ii) structural lesions and especially enthesopathies are associated with a worse QoL and iii) treatment using phosphate supplements and/or vitamin D is associated with a better mental health score.


Subject(s)
Familial Hypophosphatemic Rickets/physiopathology , Fractures, Bone/physiopathology , Genetic Diseases, X-Linked/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis/physiopathology , Quality of Life , Spondylarthritis/physiopathology , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Familial Hypophosphatemic Rickets/diagnostic imaging , Familial Hypophosphatemic Rickets/epidemiology , Female , Fractures, Bone/diagnostic imaging , Fractures, Bone/epidemiology , Genetic Diseases, X-Linked/diagnostic imaging , Genetic Diseases, X-Linked/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis/diagnostic imaging , Osteoarthritis/epidemiology , Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnostic imaging , Osteoarthritis, Hip/epidemiology , Osteoarthritis, Hip/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/diagnostic imaging , Osteoarthritis, Knee/epidemiology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Spine/diagnostic imaging , Osteoarthritis, Spine/epidemiology , Osteoarthritis, Spine/physiopathology , Prospective Studies , Radiography , Rheumatic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Rheumatic Diseases/epidemiology , Spondylarthritis/diagnostic imaging , Spondylarthritis/epidemiology , Spondylarthropathies/diagnostic imaging , Spondylarthropathies/epidemiology , Spondylarthropathies/physiopathology
11.
Can J Diet Pract Res ; 77(2): 98-102, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26568150

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To describe body composition (fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM)), strength, and nutritional characteristics of patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis undergoing total joint arthroplasty. METHODS: In this prospective pilot study, osteoarthritic patients underwent body composition assessment using bioelectrical impedance analysis, grip strength measurement, and completed a 24-h dietary recall during their pre-operative assessment. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were included (∼66% females, age 43-89 years). Mean ± SD body mass index (BMI) was 32.79 ± 6.48 kg/m(2) and 62% were obese. Compared with hip osteoarthritis patients, knee osteoarthritis patients had a higher BMI (P = 0.018) and males with knee osteoarthritis had a lower grip strength (P = 0.028). There was a wide range in FM and FFM values across the BMI spectrum. Patients with a higher FM index (FMI, FM/height in m(2)) had higher levels of pain (P = 0.036) and females with higher FMI had a lower grip strength (P = 0.048). Dietary under-reporting was common and many patients did not meet recommendations for protein, vitamins C and E, or omega-3 fatty acids. Those who consumed less protein than the recommended dietary allowance were older (P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: A wide variability of body composition and dietary intake was observed which may impact strength and ultimately affect physical function. As such, patients with osteoarthritis may benefit from targeted nutrition and physical activity interventions before and after surgery.


Subject(s)
Body Composition , Diet , Hand Strength , Osteoarthritis, Hip/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ascorbic Acid/administration & dosage , Ascorbic Acid/analysis , Body Mass Index , Dietary Proteins/administration & dosage , Dietary Proteins/analysis , Electric Impedance , Exercise , Fatty Acids, Omega-3/administration & dosage , Fatty Acids, Omega-3/analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Recall , Middle Aged , Nutritional Status , Obesity/physiopathology , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Recommended Dietary Allowances , Vitamin E/administration & dosage , Vitamin E/analysis
13.
Article in Slovak | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25748663

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in the patients elected to cementless total hip replacement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The group evaluated comprised 100 patients with primary or secondary forms of coxarthrosis who underwent cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). The results of densitometric examination of the lumbar spine and proximal femur were analysed. Based on the lowest T-score value, the patients were divided into three groups, i.e., fist, normal bone density; second, osteopenia; third, osteoporosis. Clinical examination included patient medical history, Harris hip scores and visual analogue scale assessment for pain intensity; the Kellgren-Lawrence classification was used to measure the grade of hip osteoarthritis; blood tests were made to assess the levels of total calcium, ionised calcium, phosphorus, vitamin D and the markers of bone resorption and formation. RESULTS: Osteoporosis was found in 32 and osteopenia in 21 patients; 47 patients had normal bone density. Osteoporosis was detected in the lumbar spine of 21 patients, in the proximal femur of nine patients and at both sites in two patients. In 13 patients this diagnosis was made for the fist time. The patients with osteoporosis had a significantly lower body mass index. There were no differences in the other characteristics, i.e., age, functional, radiological and laboratory findings, among the groups; all three showed the mean vitamin D concentration below the lowest level of its physiological range. Insufficient vitamin D levels were found in 54 women and 18 men. Of all patients, only 13 women and four men took vitamin D supplements. DISCUSSION Osteoarthritis and osteoporosis are the most frequent complex musculoskeletal diseases. Several studies have suggested that these disorders are mutually exclusive. This assumption has been based on the absence of radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis seen in many elderly patients with femoral neck fractures. Our relatively frequent findings of osteopenia and osteoporosis in this study show that patients with osteoarthritis may not be protected from the development of generalised osteoporosis. Our results are compared with the relevant literature data and potential effects of osteoporosis and vitamin D deficiency on total hip arthroplasty are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Hip osteoarthritis does not reduce the risk of generalised osteoporosis. We found a relative high incidence of osteopenia and osteoporosis as well as vitamin D deficiency in patient with advanced form of hip osteoarthritis.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Bone Diseases, Metabolic/complications , Osteoarthritis, Hip/complications , Aged , Body Mass Index , Bone Cements , Bone Density/physiology , Bone Diseases, Metabolic/physiopathology , Female , Femur/physiopathology , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Hip/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Hip/surgery , Osteoporosis/complications , Osteoporosis/physiopathology , Vitamin D Deficiency/complications
14.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 67(5): 718-24, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25302697

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether an underlying diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or osteoarthritis (OA) impacts the 90-day readmission rates after total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: We analyzed prospectively collected data from an integrated health care system, Total Joint Replacement Registry, of adults with RA or OA undergoing unilateral primary THA or TKA during 2009-2011. Adjusted logistic regression models for 90-day readmission were fit. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated. Study year was an effect modifier for the outcome; therefore separate analyses were conducted for each of the 3 study years. RESULTS: Of the 34,311 patients, 496 had RA and 33,815 had OA. Comparisons of RA and OA patients, respectively, were 73% and 61% women, 45% and 70% white, and patients had a mean age of 61 versus 67 years (P < 0.001). Crude 90-day readmission rates for RA and OA were 8.5% and 6.7%, respectively. The adjusted odds of 90-day readmission increased from year to year for RA compared to OA patients, from 0.89 (95% CI 0.46-1.71) in 2009 to 1.34 (95% CI 0.69-2.61) in 2010, and to 1.74 (95% CI 1.16-2.60) in 2011. The 2 most common readmission reasons were joint prosthesis infection (10.2%) and septicemia (10.2%) in RA and joint prosthesis infection (5.7%) and other postoperative infection (5.1%) in OA. CONCLUSION: RA is a risk factor for 90-day readmission after primary THA or TKA. An increasing risk of readmissions noted in RA in 2011 is concerning and indicates that further studies should examine the reasons for this increasing trend.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/surgery , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Hip Joint/surgery , Knee Joint/surgery , Osteoarthritis, Hip/surgery , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Patient Readmission , Aged , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/physiopathology , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Hip Joint/physiopathology , Humans , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Linear Models , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis, Hip/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
15.
JAMA ; 311(19): 1987-97, 2014 May 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24846036

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: There is limited evidence supporting use of physical therapy for hip osteoarthritis. OBJECTIVE: To determine efficacy of physical therapy on pain and physical function in patients with hip osteoarthritis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized, placebo-controlled, participant- and assessor-blinded trial involving 102 community volunteers with hip pain levels of 40 or higher on a visual analog scale of 100 mm (range, 0-100 mm; 100 indicates worst pain possible) and hip osteoarthritis confirmed by radiograph. Forty-nine patients in the active group and 53 in the sham group underwent 12 weeks of intervention and 24 weeks of follow-up (May 2010-February 2013) INTERVENTIONS: Participants attended 10 treatment sessions over 12 weeks. Active treatment included education and advice, manual therapy, home exercise, and gait aid if appropriate. Sham treatment included inactive ultrasound and inert gel. For 24 weeks after treatment, the active group continued unsupervised home exercise while the sham group self-applied gel 3 times weekly. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcomes were average pain (0 mm, no pain; 100 mm, worst pain possible) and physical function (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, 0 no difficulty to 68 extreme difficulty) at week 13. Secondary outcomes were these measures at week 36 and impairments, physical performance, global change, psychological status, and quality of life at weeks 13 and 36. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients (94%) completed week 13 measurements and 83 (81%) completed week 36 measurements. The between-group differences for improvements in pain were not significant. For the active group, the baseline mean (SD) visual analog scale score was 58.8 mm (13.3) and the week-13 score was 40.1 mm (24.6); for the sham group, the baseline score was 58.0 mm (11.6) and the week-13 score was 35.2 mm (21.4). The mean difference was 6.9 mm favoring sham treatment (95% CI, -3.9 to 17.7). The function scores were not significantly different between groups. The baseline mean (SD) physical function score for the active group was 32.3 (9.2) and the week-13 score was 27.5 (12.9) units, whereas the baseline score for the sham treatment group was 32.4 (8.4) units and the week-13 score was 26.4 (11.3) units, for a mean difference of 1.4 units favoring sham (95% CI, -3.8 to 6.5) at week 13. There were no between-group differences in secondary outcomes (except greater week-13 improvement in the balance step test in the active group). Nineteen of 46 patients (41%) in the active group reported 26 mild adverse effects and 7 of 49 (14%) in the sham group reported 9 mild adverse events (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among adults with painful hip osteoarthritis, physical therapy did not result in greater improvement in pain or function compared with sham treatment, raising questions about its value for these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12610000439044.


Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis, Hip/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Hip/therapy , Physical Therapy Modalities , Aged , Double-Blind Method , Exercise Therapy/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Health , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Manipulations/methods , Osteoarthritis, Hip/complications , Pain/etiology , Pain Measurement , Patient Education as Topic , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome
16.
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi ; 117(2): 351-7, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24340516

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Coxarthrosis is a disorder of the physiological balance between the strength of the articular cartilage and articular bone, and between the pressures exerted on the joint. It is a disease with a slow progressive and long course. Its insidious onset and progression, marked by variable periods of stagnation lasting months or even years make it difficult to establish the time of onset. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted between January 2012 and December 2012, on a series of 27 coxarthrosis patients, diagnosed at the Rheumatology Clinic of the lasi Rehabilitation Hospital. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Of the 27 patients, 11 (40.74%) had primary bilateral coxarthrosis, 8 (29.63%) early coxarthrosis. right, 6 (22.22%) coxarthrosis, left, secondary to aseptic femoral head osteonecrosis, and 2 (7.41%) patients had bilateral coxarthrosis secondary to acetabular insufficiency. Kinesitherapy proved to be highly effective in the rehabilitation of coxarthrosis patients by alleviating pain, mechanical protection of the hip joint, walking rehabilitation in total hip arthroplasty, and social and professional integration of the patients. The massage besides its analgesic effect also acted as a muscle relaxant. Once the objectives have been met, the kinesiology program becomes global and functional rather than analytical, as it aims at reintegrating the coxofemoral joint into normal movement patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Kinesitherapy has been shown to be a physical treatment that can not be replaced by other rehabilitation methods and is crucial in the recovery of lost functions.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Kinesiology, Applied/methods , Osteoarthritis, Hip/etiology , Osteoarthritis, Hip/rehabilitation , Disease Progression , Humans , Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis, Hip/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Hip/prevention & control , Treatment Outcome , Walking
17.
Trials ; 14: 149, 2013 May 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23701973

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Traditional Indian Ayurvedic medicine uses complex treatment approaches, including manual therapies, lifestyle and nutritional advice, dietary supplements, medication, yoga, and purification techniques. Ayurvedic strategies are often used to treat osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee; however, no systematic data are available on their effectiveness in comparison with standard care. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of complex Ayurvedic treatment in comparison with conventional methods of treating OA symptoms in patients with knee osteoarthritis. METHODS AND DESIGN: In a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, 150 patients between 40 and 70 years, diagnosed with osteoarthritis of the knee, following American College of Rheumatology criteria and an average pain intensity of ≥40 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale in the affected knee at baseline will be randomized into two groups. In the Ayurveda group, treatment will include tailored combinations of manual treatments, massages, dietary and lifestyle advice, consideration of selected foods, nutritional supplements, yoga posture advice, and knee massage. Patients in the conventional group will receive self-care advice, pain medication, weight-loss advice (if overweight), and physiotherapy following current international guidelines. Both groups will receive 15 treatment sessions over 12 weeks. Outcomes will be evaluated after 6 and 12 weeks and 6 and 12 months. The primary endpoint is a change in the score on the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) after 12 weeks. Secondary outcome measurements will use WOMAC subscales, a pain disability index, a visual analog scale for pain and sleep quality, a pain experience scale, a quality-of-life index, a profile of mood states, and Likert scales for patient satisfaction, patient diaries, and safety. Using an adapted PRECIS scale, the trial was identified as lying mainly in the middle of the efficacy-effectiveness continuum. DISCUSSION: This trial is the first to compare the effectiveness of a complex Ayurvedic intervention with a complex conventional intervention in a Western medical setting in patients with knee osteoarthritis. During the trial design, aspects of efficacy and effectiveness were discussed. The resulting design is a compromise between rigor and pragmatism. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01225133.


Subject(s)
Arthralgia/therapy , Holistic Health , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Medicine, Ayurvedic , Osteoarthritis, Hip/therapy , Research Design , Adult , Aged , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Arthralgia/diagnosis , Arthralgia/physiopathology , Clinical Protocols , Combined Modality Therapy , Comparative Effectiveness Research , Diet , Dietary Supplements , Disability Evaluation , Feeding Behavior , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Massage , Middle Aged , Nutritional Status , Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis, Hip/physiopathology , Pain Measurement , Patient Satisfaction , Posture , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Risk Reduction Behavior , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Yoga
18.
J. bras. med ; 101(02): 47-52, mar.-abr. 2013. ilus, tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-686294

ABSTRACT

A osteoartrite (OA) é a causa mais frequente de doença crônica musculoesquelética, sendo sem dúvida a maior causa de limitação das atividades diárias entre os idosos. Atualmente, cerca de 40% dos adultos com idade superior a 70 anos sofrem de OA do joelho; destes, 80% apresentam limitações de movimento e em 25% as atividades diárias estão comprometidas. Nas últimas décadas têm ocorrido avanços na terapêutica da osteoartrite


Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common cause of chronic musculoskeletal disease and the most prevalent reason for the limitation of daily activities of the elderly population. Currently, about 40% of adults aged over 70 suffer from OA of the knee. Of these, 80% suffer from limitations in motion and 25% are engaged to carry out their daily activities. In recent decades there have been advances in the treatment of osteoarthritis


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Osteoarthritis, Hip/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Hip/drug therapy , Anti-Inflammatory Agents , Acetaminophen/therapeutic use , Knee Joint , Glucosamine/administration & dosage , Osteoarthritis/rehabilitation , Patient Education as Topic , Viscosupplementation , Weight Loss
19.
J Integr Med ; 11(1): 17-25, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23464642

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An increasingly aging population implies an increasing prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA) of hip or knee. It has been ascertained that unspecific hydrotherapy of OA according to Sebastian Kneipp not only improves the range of mobility but also reduces pain significantly and increases the quality of life of the patients affected. OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this pilot study was to determine the effects of hydrotherapy in comparison to conventional physiotherapy, and to analyze the feasibility of the study design under clinical circumstances. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: The study design is a prospective randomized controlled three-arm clinical pilot trial, carried out at a specialist clinic for integrative medicine. Thirty patients diagnosed with symptomatic OA of hip or knee and radiologic findings were randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups and a control group: hydrotherapy (group 1), physiotherapy (group 2), and both physiotherapy and hydrotherapy (group 3, control group) of the affected joint. PRIMARY OUTCOME: pain intensity of the affected joint in the course of inpatient treatment; secondary outcome: health-related quality of life, joint-specific pain and mobility in the course of the study. RESULTS: Concerning the main outcome, intervention group 1 showed most beneficial effects in the course of inpatient treatment, followed by groups 3 and 2, and also the indirect flexion ability of hip or knee together with the general patient mobility through the "timed up and go" test were mainly improved within group 1 followed by groups 3 and 2. CONCLUSION: The results of this pilot study demonstrate beneficial effects of hydrotherapy. The study design is feasible. For statistically significant evidence and a robust conclusion of efficacy of Kneipp's hydrotherapy, a larger sample size is necessary. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT 00950326.


Subject(s)
Hydrotherapy , Osteoarthritis, Hip/therapy , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy , Physical Therapy Modalities , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Hip/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Hip/psychology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/psychology , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Range of Motion, Articular , Treatment Outcome
20.
Rheumatol Int ; 33(7): 1821-8, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23325095

ABSTRACT

The subject of the study is to investigate whether health-related quality of life (HRQoL), pain and function of patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA) improves after a specialist care intervention coordinated by a physical therapist and a nurse practitioner (NP) and to assess satisfaction with this care at 12 weeks. This observational study included all consecutive patients with hip or knee OA referred to an outpatient orthopaedics clinic. The intervention consisted of a single, standardized visit (assessment and individually tailored management advice, to be executed in primary care) and a telephone follow-up, coordinated by a physical therapist and a NP, in cooperation with an orthopaedic surgeon. Assessments at baseline and 10 weeks thereafter included the short form-36 (SF-36), EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D), hip or knee disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS or KOOS), the intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain questionnaire (ICOAP) for hip or knee and a multidimensional satisfaction questionnaire (23 items; 4 point scale). Eighty-seven patients (57 female), mean age 68 years (SD 10.9) were included, with follow-up data available in 63 patients (72 %). Statistically significant improvements were seen regarding the SF-36 physical summary component score, the EQ-5D, the ICOAP scores for hip and knee, the HOOS subscale sports and the KOOS subscales pain, symptoms and activities of daily living. The proportions of patients reporting to be satisfied ranged from 79 to 98 % per item. In patients with hip and knee OA pain, function and HRQoL improved significantly after a single-visit multidisciplinary OA management intervention in specialist care, with high patient satisfaction.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Nurse Practitioners/organization & administration , Osteoarthritis, Hip/therapy , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Physical Therapists/organization & administration , Physical Therapy Modalities/organization & administration , Activities of Daily Living , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ambulatory Care/organization & administration , Biomechanical Phenomena , Chi-Square Distribution , Disability Evaluation , Female , Hip Joint/physiopathology , Humans , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Organizational , Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis, Hip/nursing , Osteoarthritis, Hip/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Hip/psychology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis, Knee/nursing , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/psychology , Pain Measurement , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Recovery of Function , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL