ABSTRACT
Distraction osteogenesis (DO) is used to form new bone between bone segments to lengthen the callus. Skeletal muscles frequently fail to adapt to distraction, which causes complications. Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) has been implicated as a central regulator of muscle repair. We hypothesized that IGF-1 injection could reduce muscle complications in DO. A total of 102 Sprague-Dawley rats received DO or did not were randomly assigned into saline, IGF-1 and normal groups. On the day before the distraction, the rats in the IGF-1 group were injected with IGF-1. The gastrocnemius muscles of the rats were harvested at the 0, 1st, 4th, 7th, and 10th days of distraction. The weight of the muscles, cross-sectional area (CSA) of the muscle fibers, collagen volume fraction (CVF), maximum limit load (MLL), maximum contraction forces, and gene expression of Akt, MyoD, myogenin, myostatin, and collagen I were analyzed. The results indicated that IGF-1 injection had increased the weights, CSA of the muscle fibers, MLL and force generation of the gastrocnemius. Also, Akt, MyoD, and myogenin were upregulated, and myostatin was downregulated in the IGF-1 group. Injection of IGF-1 could attenuate the gastrocnemius atrophy, prevent fibrosis, increase MLL, and regulate the related mRNA.
Subject(s)
Insulin-Like Growth Factor I/therapeutic use , Muscle, Skeletal/drug effects , Muscular Atrophy/prevention & control , Osteogenesis, Distraction/adverse effects , Regeneration/drug effects , Animals , Collagen Type I/metabolism , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Insulin-Like Growth Factor I/pharmacology , Male , Muscle, Skeletal/metabolism , Muscular Atrophy/etiology , Random Allocation , Rats, Sprague-DawleyABSTRACT
Midface advancement with distraction osteogenesis using the rigid external device (RED) is an effective but invasive treatment to correct the hypoplastic midface. This study draws up an inventory of the stressors, needs and coping strategies of families during this treatment, to determine the best conditions for family-centred care. Data were collected by reviewing the patients' files and administering semi-structured interviews. The data were analysed using the software program Atlas.ti and were re-analysed by an independent researcher. Parents and patients were interviewed separately. Fourteen families participated. Four patients had an absolute indication for surgery. All families were eager to have the patient's facial appearance improved. Nevertheless, despite psychological counselling, they experienced stress when confronted with the changed facial appearance. Another stressor was weight loss. Six patients were in a state of acute malnutrition and needed supplementary feeding. We conclude that the best conditions for family-centred care should be aligned to the different phases of treatment. Leading up to surgery it is important to screen families' expectations regarding aesthetic, functional and social outcomes and to assess their capacity to cope with the long treatment and effects of changed facial appearance. Peer contact and psychosocial training to increase self-esteem are tools to enhance co-operation and satisfaction. During the distraction and stabilisation phase, we advise the monitoring of nutritional intake and weight. During all phases of treatment easy accessibility to the team is recommended.
Subject(s)
Craniofacial Dysostosis/psychology , Craniofacial Dysostosis/surgery , Osteogenesis, Distraction/psychology , Parents/psychology , Adaptation, Psychological , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Counseling , Decision Making , Eating , Esthetics/psychology , External Fixators , Family/psychology , Humans , Osteogenesis, Distraction/adverse effects , Patient Education as Topic , Patient Satisfaction , Retrospective Studies , Self Efficacy , Social Participation , Time Factors , Weight Loss , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUNDS: Treatment for bone defect remains a challenge for orthopedists. Bone transport gives an effective alternative, which can be performed with an external fixator alone or combined with an intramedullary nail. Each has its advantages and disadvantages. We present a retrospective study to find out the optimal choice by evaluating the outcomes of treatment for femoral bone defect with two methods. METHODS: Two groups of patients, the monolateral external fixator alone (group A, n = 13) and the monolateral external fixator combined with intramedullary nail (group B, n = 15), were compared. Duration of the external fixator, external fixator index, radiographic consolidation index, complication, and total cost for treatment was also recorded. A modified classification of the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) was used to assess results in two groups of patients; another SF-36 health survey questionnaire was used to assess the life qualities patients of two groups. RESULTS: Healing was achieved in 13/13 and 13/15 of the two groups, respectively. The rates of complications were significantly higher in the group A. Two patients performed amputations because of persistent deep infections in group B. Statistically significant difference was found when comparing ASAMI scores and categories of the SF-36 health survey. CONCLUSIONS: Bone transport by monolateral external fixator with the use of intramedullary nail reduces the incidence of complication and the duration of external fixator time that give patients a better life quality in both physical and emotional. However, if chronic osteitis exists, bone transport should be treated with monolateral external fixator alone due to a lower rate of amputations.
Subject(s)
Femur , Foot Deformities, Acquired , Ilizarov Technique/statistics & numerical data , Osteogenesis, Distraction , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Adult , Bone Nails , China , Comparative Effectiveness Research , External Fixators , Female , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Femur/surgery , Foot Deformities, Acquired/diagnosis , Foot Deformities, Acquired/etiology , Foot Deformities, Acquired/psychology , Foot Deformities, Acquired/surgery , Humans , Internal Fixators , Male , Osteogenesis, Distraction/adverse effects , Osteogenesis, Distraction/instrumentation , Osteogenesis, Distraction/methods , Osteogenesis, Distraction/statistics & numerical data , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Quality of Life , Radiography , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
The purpose was to evaluate the effect of mandibular distraction osteogenesis (DO) on condylar cartilage after radiotherapy and hyperbaric oxygenation (HBO). Unilateral DO was performed on low- and high-dose irradiated rabbits with or without accompanying HBO, and non-irradiated animals. High-dose irradiated animals were given irradiation in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) equivalent to 50 Gy in 25 fractions. Low-dose irradiated rabbits received scattered irradiation of 10% of that of high-dose irradiated animals. After radiotherapy, some of the animals were given HBO 18 times at 2.5 ATA for 90 min/day. One month after completion of radiotherapy, distraction osteotomy with distractor placement was performed. After a latency period, distraction was started at the rate of 1 mm/day, continued for 2 weeks, and the regenerate was allowed to consolidate for 1 month. Condyles of non-operated rabbits served as controls. Histological changes were more evident on the distracted than on the non-distracted side. In distracted, non-irradiated animals, condylar cartilage changes were minor and probably clinically insignificant. In irradiated rabbits, condylar cartilage changes on the lengthened side were severe, and often cartilage was either totally or partially sealed off by bone. Condylar heads were morphologically deformed. Even low doses of irradiation resulted in notable changes on the operated side, and HBO did not prevent disadvantageous effects.