Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 40
Filter
Add more filters

Complementary Medicines
Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Clinics (Sao Paulo) ; 79: 100322, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38484582

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Local anesthetic puncture is often related to the experience of pain. This study aimed to systematically analyze the literature on changes in pain perception during the anesthetic puncture of dental local anesthesia after Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic search was performed in eight primary databases (Embase, LILACS, BBO, LIVIVO, MedLine via PubMed, SciELO, Scopus, and Web of Science) and three additional ones (EASY, Google Scholar, and OATD) to partially capture the "gray literature". The PICO strategy was used to identify randomized clinical trials evaluating the analgesic effect of PBMT in the anesthetic puncture site of dental local anesthesia compared to placebo or control groups, without restrictions on publication language and year. Two reviewers extracted the data and assessed the individual risk of bias of the eligible studies using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool version 2.0. RESULTS: The electronic search found 3,485 records, of which eight met the eligibility criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis. The studies were published from 2011 to 2022. None of the included studies had a low risk of bias. PBMT groups showed no significant difference in pain scores compared to placebo and control groups of most studies. CONCLUSION: Based on a low to very low certainty of evidence, PBMT seems to have no effect on pain perception during anesthetic puncture in patients undergoing dental local anesthesia.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Dental , Anesthesia, Local , Low-Level Light Therapy , Pain Perception , Humans , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Pain Perception/physiology , Pain Perception/radiation effects , Anesthesia, Local/methods , Anesthesia, Dental/methods , Pain Measurement , Punctures/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Pain, Procedural/prevention & control , Pain, Procedural/etiology , Pain, Procedural/therapy
2.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 23(7): 2427-2432, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38497418

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Intense pulsed light (IPL) is used for the treatment and improvement of various skin issues. However, patients often experience local skin burning and pain after IPL treatment. Cooling and analgesic measures are indispensable. AIMS: To investigate the clinical effect of thermal shock therapy on pain relief and reduction of adverse reactions during IPL therapy. PATIENTS/METHODS: A total of 60 female patients with facial photoaging who received IPL therapy were enrolled in the study. As a comparative split-face study, one side of the face was randomly selected as the control side. The other side was given thermal shock therapy before and after the IPL treatment immediately as analgesic side. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the pain degree of the patients. The telephone follow-ups regarding the occurrence of adverse reactions were conducted respectively on the 2nd day, 7th day, and 1 month after treatment. RESULTS: The VAS score and skin temperature of analgesia side was lower than that of control side at different stages of treatment. In terms of adverse reactions, the incidence of transient facial redness on the analgesic side was lower than that on the control side. Two patients showed slight secondary pigmentation on the control side, and the other patients showed no other adverse reactions on both sides. CONCLUSIONS: Thermal shock therapy assisted IPL therapy can reduce skin temperature during treatment, effectively relieve patients' pain, reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions caused by heat injury, and improve patients' comfort level.


Subject(s)
Intense Pulsed Light Therapy , Pain Measurement , Humans , Female , Intense Pulsed Light Therapy/adverse effects , Intense Pulsed Light Therapy/methods , Middle Aged , Adult , Skin Aging/radiation effects , Skin Temperature , Face , Pain Management/methods , Pain Management/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Pain, Procedural/etiology , Pain, Procedural/prevention & control , Pain, Procedural/diagnosis , Pain, Procedural/therapy
3.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 46(6): 786-793, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36944851

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Hypnosis is useful for diminishing distress during medical procedures. This study investigated the efficacy of virtually augmented self-hypnosis as an adjunctive non-pharmacological method for procedural pain and anxiety relief during endovascular interventions (EVI). METHODS: We compared an immersive distraction experience (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT04561596) featuring virtual reality (VR) using a head-mounted display versus treatment as usual (TAU). Patients followed the "Aqua" module (Oncomfort™) consisting of a scuba dive and breathing exercises. They experienced a self-induced dissociative state similar to clinical hypnosis without direct intervention of a professional. Enrollment followed a 1:1 randomized open study (VR or TAU). Patients' feelings were evaluated just before and after the procedure, and 3 months following intervention. Anxiety was evaluated using the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and pain (sensory, emotional, and memory) with a visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: This study included 100 patients. Mean anxiety (pre-post) was significantly reduced within groups and between groups (difference of 4.2 points, p = 0.016). The percentage of responders to anxiety lowering were 76 and 46% for VR and TAU, respectively (p = 0.004). The two groups did not significantly differ in mean sensory-intensity and affective emotional pain (pre-post) using VAS, in negative memories concerning remembered pain at 3 months (difference > 1 from immediate post-procedural reported pain intensity), mean procedural time, or the need for analgesic or sedative drugs. CONCLUSIONS: VR self-hypnosis has the potential to improve the management of patients' distress during radiological procedures. It is safe and effective for reducing anxiety during EVI.


Subject(s)
Hypnosis , Pain, Procedural , Virtual Reality , Humans , Pain , Pain, Procedural/psychology , Pain, Procedural/therapy , Anxiety/prevention & control , Anxiety/psychology , Hypnosis/methods
4.
Pain Med ; 24(6): 661-702, 2023 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36448690

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Pain and distress are common in children undergoing medical procedures, exposing them to acute and chronic biopsychosocial impairments if inadequately treated. Clinical hypnosis has emerged as a potentially beneficial treatment for children's procedural pain and distress due to evidence of effectiveness and potential superiority to other psychological interventions. However, systematic reviews of clinical hypnosis for children's procedural pain and distress have been predominantly conducted in children undergoing oncology and needle procedures and are lacking in broader pediatric contexts. This scoping review maps the evidence of clinical hypnosis for children's procedural pain and distress across broad pediatric contexts while highlighting knowledge gaps and areas requiring further investigation. METHODS: Published databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science) and grey literature were searched in addition to hand-searching reference lists and key journals (up to May 2022). Two independent reviewers screened the titles and abstracts of search results followed by a full-text review against eligibility criteria. Articles were included if they involved a clinical hypnosis intervention comprising an induction followed by therapeutic suggestions for pain and distress in children undergoing medical procedures. This review followed the Arksey and O'Malley (2005) methodology and incorporated additional scoping review recommendations by the Joanna Briggs Institute and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. RESULTS: A total of 38 eligible studies involving 2,205 children were included after 4,775 articles were screened. Research on clinical hypnosis for children's procedural pain and distress was marked by a lack of fidelity measures and qualitative data as well as by inadequate intervention reporting and high attrition rates. Evidence regarding the safety of clinical hypnosis, pain unpleasantness outcomes, factors influencing outcomes, as well as barriers and facilitators to implementing hypnosis and study procedures was also lacking. Clinical hypnosis has potential benefits for children's procedural pain and distress based on evidence of superiority to control conditions and nonpharmacological interventions (e.g., distraction, acupressure) with moderate to large effect sizes as reported in 76% of studies. However, heterogeneous interventions, contexts, study designs, and populations were identified, and the certainty of the evidence was not evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: The review suggests potential benefits of clinical hypnosis for children's procedural pain and distress and thus provides a precursor for further systematic reviews and trials investigating the effectiveness of clinical hypnosis. The review also indicates the need to further explore the feasibility, acceptability, implementation, and safety of clinical hypnosis in children undergoing painful procedures. Based on the review, researchers implementing clinical hypnosis should adequately report interventions or use treatment manuals, follow recommended research guidelines, and assess the fidelity of intervention delivery to promote replicating and comparing interventions. The review also highlights common methodological shortcomings of published trials to avoid, such as the lack of implementation frameworks, small sample sizes, inadequate reporting of standard care or control conditions, and limited evidence on pain unpleasantness outcomes.


Subject(s)
Hypnosis , Pain, Procedural , Child , Humans , Needles , Pain/psychology , Pain, Procedural/therapy , Punctures
5.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 101(41): e30939, 2022 Oct 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36254036

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The painful procedures experienced by neonates during hospitalization have short-term or long-term effects on neonates. While the limitations of previous interventions make it imperative to explore effective interventions that are readily available. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of massage for pain management in neonates. METHODS: This systematic review was registered in PROSPER. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Clinical Trials Registry were searched to December 2021. Two reviewers independently carried out study selection, data extraction, bias risk assessment. Continuous data were analyzed by mean differences (MD). Dichotomous data were reported using relative risk. If at least two studies reported identical results by the same pain assessment tool, a meta-analysis was conducted using random effect model and inverse variance. RESULTS: Total 11 included studies involving 755 neonates investigated the effects of massage on neonatal pain response compared to standard care. The meta-analysis showed that massage could effectively improve pain response in neonates compared to standard care no matter whether neonatal infant pain scale (NIPS) or premature infant pain profile (PIPP) was used as an assessment tool. Besides, massage was also effective for crying duration, blood oxygen saturation both during and after the procedure, but non-effective for the variation of respiratory rate after the procedure, and heart rate both during and after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Massage may have a positive effect on pain relief of neonate, and rigorous trials are needed in the future to determine the most effective massage method.


Subject(s)
Pain, Procedural , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Massage , Pain/drug therapy , Pain Management/methods , Pain, Procedural/therapy , Punctures
6.
PLoS One ; 17(2): e0263002, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35196310

ABSTRACT

Endovascular interventions (EVI) are increasingly performed as minimally-invasive alternatives to surgery and have many advantages, including a decreased need for general anesthesia. However, EVI can be stressful for patients and often lead to anxiety and pain related to the procedure. The use of local anesthetics, anxiolytics, and analgesic drugs can help avoid general anesthesia. Nevertheless, these drugs have potential side effects. Alternative nonpharmacological therapies can improve patients' experience during conscious interventions and reduce the need for additional medications. The added value of virtually augmented self-hypnosis (VA-HYPO) and its potential to reduce pain and anxiety during peripheral and visceral arterial and venous EVI is unknown. This is a prospective two-arm trial designed to randomize 100 patients in two groups according to the use or not of VA-HYPO during peripheral EVI as a complementary nonpharmacological technique to improve patient comfort. The main objective is to compare per-procedural anxiety, and the secondary aim is to compare the rated per-procedural pain in both groups. The potential significance is that VA-HYPO may improve patients' experience during peripheral and visceral arterial and venous EVI and other minimally invasive interventions performed under local anesthesia. Trial registration: Our study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov, with trial registration number: NCT04561596.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/etiology , Anxiety/therapy , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Hypnosis/methods , Pain Management/methods , Pain, Procedural/etiology , Pain, Procedural/therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anesthesia, Local/methods , Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
7.
Am Surg ; 88(1): 70-73, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33371722

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim was to evaluate the effects of music on patients' anxiety and satisfaction after undergoing dialysis access procedures under moderate sedation. METHODS: Patients (n = 30) undergoing moderate sedation for dialysis access procedures were evaluated at a single institution. Each patient filled out a survey preoperatively and postoperatively using the short form State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-6). Patient-selected music was provided by using a MP3 player with noise canceling headphones. RESULTS: Postoperatively, 77% of patients perceived music intervention as very or extremely helpful in decreasing anxiety during the procedure. Further, 93% of patients were somewhat or very satisfied with their procedure. The average pain rating was 3.1 on a scale of 0-10, in which 70% of patients had no to mild pain and 30% of patients rated moderate to severe pain. In comparison to prior procedures without music, 63% of patients rated better experience with the music intervention, 37% rated a similar experience, and 3.7% rated having a worse experience. Approximately, 93% of patients were willing to repeat procedure with music and would recommend it to other patients. Preoperative anxiety average score was 35.6 ± 13 and was reduced postoperatively to 28.9 ± 12.9 (P = .006). Preoperatively, 23% of patients rated high anxiety and postoperatively only 6.7% of patients rated high anxiety (P = .016). CONCLUSION: Music is an easy, feasible, inexpensive intervention that may reduce patients' anxiety and improve satisfaction during moderate sedation procedures and in the postoperative period.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/therapy , Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical/psychology , Conscious Sedation/methods , Music Therapy , Renal Dialysis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical/adverse effects , Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical/methods , Female , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Pain, Procedural/therapy , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Quality Improvement , Young Adult
8.
BMC Complement Med Ther ; 21(1): 154, 2021 May 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34044838

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Neuropathic pain is characterized by spontaneous painful symptoms. Medical therapies include the use of a capsaicin 8% patch (Qutenza®, Grünenthal Gmbh, Germany), and patients may experience a sharp burning sensation at application and removal of the patch. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of playing a standardized hypnosis recording during application, on the pain and anxiety induced by capsaicin treatment. METHODS: In a randomized, controlled trial, we assessed the benefits of the intervention firstly on pain and secondly on anxiety, as measured using numerical rating scales. All patients had application of the capsaicin patch, including the possibility for the patient to apply a cold patch. Participants were randomly assigned to one of 3 groups, namely the "Standard group" (no intervention), "Hypnosis group", in which a standardized hypnotic message was played during application, or the "Music group" in which relaxing music was played during application of the patch. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were included. Overall, there was no significant difference in pain scores between groups (p = 0.355). Compared to standard application, anxiety was significantly lower in the hypnosis group after application (p = 0.007), with no significant difference between the standard and music arms (p = 0.271), or between the hypnosis and music arms (p = 0.423). CONCLUSIONS: Listening to a standardized hypnotic message during application of a capsaicin patch was found to significantly lower anxiety. These findings indicate that the use of a hypnotic message can reduce discomfort and warrant its evaluation in other indications of pain or anxiety during treatment procedures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02822625 .


Subject(s)
Anxiety , Capsaicin , Hypnosis/methods , Neoplasms/complications , Neuralgia , Administration, Topical , Adult , Aged , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Analgesics/adverse effects , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Anxiety/prevention & control , Anxiety/therapy , Capsaicin/administration & dosage , Capsaicin/adverse effects , Capsaicin/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Music Therapy , Neuralgia/drug therapy , Neuralgia/etiology , Pain, Procedural/prevention & control , Pain, Procedural/therapy , Treatment Outcome
9.
Complement Ther Med ; 59: 102735, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33974990

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Neonates who undergo painful medical procedures should be given analgesics to reduce future adverse risks. The evidence for massage therapy (MT) as an analgesic method still varies, both in its terminology and implementation. Only a few studies on this topic have been conducted using a standardised trial approach. This review can thus become the basis for better future research. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to identify literature on MT practices as a method to manage or control pain in neonates undergoing painful procedures. METHODS: The methodology for this review followed the JBI scoping review methodology guidelines. Searches were performed in several databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCO), Scopus (Elsevier) and EMBASE. Data collected were then extracted by two independent reviewers, synthesised and presented in the form of tables and narratives. RESULTS: Fifteen studies involving a total of 1,058 neonates in nine countries were identified in the search as meeting the criteria set for this review. One study was a comparative study, five were quasi-experiment studies and nine were randomised control trials (RCT). CONCLUSION: The implementation of massage as a non-pharmacological analgesic method for neonates undergoing painful procedures varied among the reviewed studies. Differences were identified in terms of the body part massaged, the duration and intensity of the massage, the level of pressure and the combination of massage with other methods. All studies presented positive results for reducing pain intensity in neonates undergoing procedural pain. Therefore, it is crucial that the method used for giving massage should be practical, accurate and safe.


Subject(s)
Analgesia , Pain, Procedural , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Massage , Pain , Pain Management , Pain, Procedural/therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
10.
J Tradit Chin Med ; 41(2): 331-337, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33825415

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of acupressure applied to UB60 and K3 acupuncture points in order to relieve the procedural pain caused by heel lancing blood sampling process in the term newborns. METHODS: The data were collected by using the Information Form and the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale. Acupressure applied for 3 min before heel lancing blood sampling in the newborns in the experimental group (n = 31). No intervention was applied to newborns in the control group (n = 32). RESULTS: A significant difference was found between mean scores of the newborns in the control and acupressure group in favor of the acupressure group in terms of heart rate during and after the procedure, oxygen saturation before, during and after the procedure, duration of crying during and after the procedure (P < 0.05). It was found that there was a significant difference between groups in terms of Neonatal Infant Pain Scale mean scores during (P = 0.001) and after the procedure (P < 0.05), and the difference was found to be in favor of the acupressure group. CONCLUSION: As a result, acupressure was found to be an effective method in relieving pain caused by heel lancing blood sampling in newborns.


Subject(s)
Acupressure , Pain, Procedural/therapy , Acupuncture Points , Blood Specimen Collection/adverse effects , Female , Heel/blood supply , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Pain Management , Pain, Procedural/blood , Pain, Procedural/etiology
11.
Curr Pediatr Rev ; 17(4): 288-328, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33820520

ABSTRACT

In recent years, there has been increased interest in the study of pain in children and its treatment. It is known that when facing diagnostic and therapeutic procedures similar to those performed on adults, children either do not receive specific pain treatment or receive it on a significantly lower scale. However, recent research suggests a change in attitude and an improvement in the current treatment of children's pain. Although current knowledge demonstrates the falsity of many preconceived ideas about pain and its management, our results suggest that attitudinal change towards childhood pain remains slow and that real improvement in the training and practical application of the pediatrician who has to treat childhood pain is urgently needed. In this context, this manuscript has prepared standards and guidelines to improve pain management practices in a large number of national and international professional settings.


Subject(s)
Pain, Procedural , Adult , Child , Humans , Pain, Procedural/diagnosis , Pain, Procedural/therapy
12.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(9): e23799, 2021 Mar 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33655906

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is an uncomfortable procedure. Distraction is thought to reduce pain by decreasing the amount of attention a person spends on a painful stimulus. We aimed to assess the usefulness of smartphones on discomfort associated with the colonoscopy. METHODS: We designated 360 enrolled patients according to prospective randomized controlled study into two groups, including smartphone (SP) group (Relaxation by smartphones) and Control group (No relaxation). Measured outcomes included the discomfort, satisfaction, polyp detection rate and the willingness to repeat colonoscopy were analyzed between groups. RESULTS: The pain and distension scores of SP group patients were significantly lower than those of the Control group (2.18 ±â€Š2.80 vs 3.55 ±â€Š3.07, P < .001; 4.15 ±â€Š2.35 vs 4.79 ±â€Š2.36, P = .011, respectively). Importantly, patient-reported satisfaction scores of the SP group were significantly higher than those of the Control group (96.45 ±â€Š7.17 vs 91.12 ±â€Š10.49, respectively; P < .001). Moreover, although there were no statistical differences, patients using smartphones were more likely to have shorter reach cecum times (09m:11 s vs 07m:37 s, P = .116) and more polyp detection rate (13.3% vs 9.4%, P = .246). In addition, more patients using smartphones were willing to repeat colonoscopy but no statistical difference (85.0% vs 81.7%, P = .396). CONCLUSION: Patient using smartphone is a special manner to increase satisfaction during colonoscopy with a less discomfort and is more likely to be polyp detection rate.


Subject(s)
Colonoscopy/psychology , Pain, Procedural/therapy , Patient Satisfaction , Relaxation Therapy/instrumentation , Smartphone , Adolescent , Adult , Colonoscopy/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Pain, Procedural/psychology , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
13.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(4): e23684, 2021 Jan 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33530169

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The present evidence is insufficient for evaluating the impact of exclusive music therapy on anxiety and pain control in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to explore the efficacy of music therapy in reducing pain and anxiety in patients undergoing ESWL. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases (updated March 2020) were searched for randomized controlled trials assessing music therapy in reducing pain and anxiety in patients undergoing ESWL. The search strategy and study selection process were managed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis statement. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, music intervention groups experienced significant reductions in pain (risk ratios = -1.20, 95% confidence intervals = -1.95 to -0.45, P = .002) and anxiety (risk ratios = -3.31, 95% confidence intervals = -4.97 to -1.84, P < .0001) compared with control groups during ESWL. Music therapy gave patient more satisfaction with the treatment and a willingness to repeat the therapy was reported. However, there was no significant difference in the stone clearance rate. CONCLUSIONS: Listening to music can reduce patient's pain and anxiety significantly with increased therapy satisfaction and willingness to repeat.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/therapy , Lithotripsy/adverse effects , Music Therapy/methods , Pain Management/methods , Pain, Procedural/therapy , Adult , Anxiety/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain, Procedural/etiology , Patient Satisfaction , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Research Design , Treatment Outcome , Meta-Analysis as Topic
15.
Ann Glob Health ; 86(1): 61, 2020 06 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32587811

ABSTRACT

Background: Traditional health practitioners remain a critical source of care in Tanzania, more than 50% of Tanzanians frequently using their services. With a severe shortage of orthopaedic surgeons (1:3.3 million Tanzanians) traditional bone setters (TBSs) could potentially expand access to musculoskeletal care and improve outcomes for morbidity as a result of trauma. Objective: We sought to identify the advantages and disadvantages of traditional bone setting in Tanzania and to assess potential for collaboration between TBSs and allopathic orthopaedic surgeons. Methods: Between June and July 2017 we interviewed six TBSs identified as key informants in the regions of Kilimanjaro, Arusha, and Manyara. We conducted semi-structured interviews about practices and perspectives on allopathic healthcare, and analyzed the data using a deductive framework method. Findings: The TBSs reported that their patients were primarily recruited from their local communities via word-of-mouth communication networks. Payment methods for services included bundling costs, livestock barter, and sliding scale pricing. Potentially unsafe practices included lack of radiographic imaging to confirm reduction; cutting and puncturing of skin with unsterile tools; and rebreaking healed fractures. The TBSs described past experience collaborating with allopathic healthcare providers, referring patients to hospitals, and utilizing allopathic techniques in their practice. All expressed enthusiasm in future collaboration with allopathic hospitals. Conclusions: TBSs confer the advantages of word-of-mouth communication networks and greater financial and geographic accessibility. However, some of their practices raise concerns relating to infection, fracture malunion or nonunion, and iatrogenic trauma from manipulating previously healed fractures. A formal collaboration between TBSs and orthopaedic surgeons, based on respect and regular communication, could alleviate concerns through the development of care protocols and increase access to optimal orthopaedic care through a standardized triage and follow-up system.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Fracture Fixation/methods , Fractures, Bone/therapy , Fractures, Malunited/therapy , Infection Control , Joint Dislocations/therapy , Medicine, African Traditional/methods , Aged , Fracture Healing , Fractures, Ununited , Health Workforce , Humans , Iatrogenic Disease , Male , Middle Aged , Orthopedic Surgeons/supply & distribution , Pain, Procedural/therapy , Tanzania
16.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 24(9): 5162-5166, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32432781

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Over the ongoing pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the demand for critical care beds among medical services has rapidly exceeded its supply. Elective surgery has comprehensively been drastically limited and allocating intensive care beds to emergency cases or to high risk scheduled elective cases has become an even more difficult task. Here we present our experience which could help to handle undelayable surgical procedures during this emergency. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 2019, eight patients (4 men, 4 women) with a mean age of 88 years, needing emergency abdominal surgery underwent awake open surgery at our Department of Surgery. All of them were identified as fragile patients at preoperative evaluation by the anesthesiologist. In all cases, locoregional anesthesia (spinal, epidural or combined spinal-epidural anesthesia) was performed. Intraoperative and postoperative pain has been monitored and regularly assessed. RESULTS: None of the patients was intubated. Mean operative time was 80 minutes (minimum 30 minutes, maximum 130 minutes). Intraoperative and postoperative pain were both well controlled. None of them required postoperative intensive care support. No perioperative complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our preliminary case series, awake open surgery has resulted feasible and safe. This approach has allowed to perform undelayable major abdominal surgeries on fragile patients when intensive care beds were not available. Surely, it represents a helpful alternative in the COVID-19 era. A streamlining of workflows would fast-track both fragile patients management, as well as healthcare workers' tasks and activity.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Local/methods , Coronavirus Infections , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Laparotomy , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Wakefulness , Aged, 80 and over , Anesthesia, Epidural/methods , Anesthesia, Spinal/methods , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Female , Humans , Male , Operative Time , Pain, Postoperative/therapy , Pain, Procedural/therapy , SARS-CoV-2
17.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 46(6): 807-827, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32088931

ABSTRACT

AIM: To identify the highest-ranked pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions for pain relief during outpatient hysteroscopy. METHODS: We conducted an online bibliographic search in different databases from inception till July 2019. We included randomized controlled trials assessing effect of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions on pain relief during outpatient hysteroscopy. Our main outcomes were pain scores at different endpoints of the procedure. We applied this network meta-analysis based on the frequentist approach using statistical package 'netmeta' (version 1.0-1) in R. RESULTS: The review included 39 randomized controlled trials (Women n = 3964). Misoprostol plus intracervical block anesthesia (mean difference [MD] = -3.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-6.06, -0.59]), misoprostol (MD = -1.92, 95% CI [-3.04, -0.81]) and IV analgesia (MD = -2.01, 95% CI [-3.27, -0.25]) were effective in reducing pain during the procedure compared to placebo. Ranking probability showed that misoprostol plus intracervical block anesthesia was the highest ranked pharmacological treatment for pain relief during the procedure (P score = 0.92) followed by misoprostol alone (P score = 0.78), and IV analgesia (P score = 0.76). Regarding nonpharmacological treatments, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) showed a significant pain reduction compared to placebo (MD = -1.80, 95% CI [-3.31, -0.29]). TENS ranked as the best nonpharmacological treatment (P score = 0.80) followed by CO2 distention (P score = 0.65) and bladder distention (P score = 0.60). CONCLUSION: Combination of misoprostol plus local anesthesia appears to be the most effective pharmacological approach for pain reduction during and after outpatient hysteroscopy. Nonpharmacological approaches as TENS and bladder distention showed considerable efficacy but should be further investigated.


Subject(s)
Hysterotomy/adverse effects , Pain Management/methods , Pain, Postoperative/therapy , Pain, Procedural/therapy , Ambulatory Care/methods , Anesthesia, Local/methods , Female , Humans , Hysterotomy/methods , Misoprostol/therapeutic use , Network Meta-Analysis , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
18.
Eur J Pediatr ; 179(6): 985-992, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32030454

ABSTRACT

Aromatherapy with essential oils can be used to relieve children. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlations between psychological and physiologic findings after lavender oil inhalation among children assigned to undergo tooth extraction. A total of 126 children aged between 6 and 12 years were enrolled in the study. The groups were randomly divided into control and lavender groups. The lavender group inhaled 100% lavender oil for 3 min before the interventions, the control group received no prior application. Psychological assessments were made using face image scale (FIS), Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) and Wong-Baker pain rating scale (WBS). Physiologic changes were assessed using vital signs evaluations. All parameters were noted prior to applications, after inhalation, anesthesia injection, and tooth extraction. The lavender group showed significant lower anxiety and pain scores after tooth extraction (p < 0.05). Significantly lower levels of blood pressures and a significant pulse rate drop were found after inhalation in the lavender group. A statistically significant increase in heart rate was observed after anesthesia injection and tooth extraction in the control group (p < 0.05).Conclusion: Lavender oil can be preferred as a treatment of choice in routine pediatric dentistry.Trial registration number: NCT04115891 (Lavender Oil Inhalation Help to Overcome Dental Anxiety Among Children)What is Known:• Dental anxiety is the most common factor that causes children to have difficulty with the dentist and their parents during treatment.• Aromatherapy with essential oils can be used to relieve children.What is New:• Aromatherapy with lavender oil relieves the child by reducing the level of anxiety and facilitates dental treatment.• During surgical procedures such as local anesthesia and tooth extraction, lavender oil inhalation decreases pain levels of children.


Subject(s)
Aromatherapy/methods , Dental Anxiety/therapy , Oils, Volatile/therapeutic use , Pain, Procedural/therapy , Plant Oils/therapeutic use , Administration, Inhalation , Child , Female , Humans , Lavandula , Male , Pain Measurement , Pain, Procedural/diagnosis , Treatment Outcome
19.
Am J Clin Hypn ; 62(3): 267-281, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31928519

ABSTRACT

Pain sensation is characterized by abrupt changes in central nervous system activity producing autonomic reactivity. While clinical hypnosis has demonstrated its benefits for children in pain management, it is not clear whether hypnosis modulated autonomic pain response in children in clinical conditions. Here, we studied autonomic responses under hypnosis to sutures in pediatric emergencies. For that, 42 children (mean age: 6.5 years, range 1.5 to 13) were divided into two groups consecutively (hypnosis and control groups), according to their choice. Time-frequency analysis was applied on RR intervals (heart rate interbeat intervals, or RRI) to estimate parasympathetic reactivity based on high frequency power (HF) and the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI®) and on sympathetic reactivity (low frequency power [LF]) and LF/HF ratio). We observed that RRI and LF/HF ratio varied according to suture and hypnosis (p < 0.05): RRI was higher and LF/HF ratio was lower during sutures in the hypnosis group in comparison to the control group whereas HF and ANI® increased only during hypnosis. To conclude, hypnosis in pediatric emergencies reduces sympathetic cardiac pain reactivity and could be a marker of pain relief under hypnosis, while parasympathetic activity seems to be a better marker of hypnosis.


Subject(s)
Autonomic Nervous System , Heart Rate , Hypnosis , Pain Management , Pain, Procedural/therapy , Adolescent , Autonomic Nervous System/physiopathology , Child , Child, Preschool , Emergencies , Feasibility Studies , Female , Heart Rate/physiology , Humans , Infant , Male , Pain, Procedural/physiopathology , Surgical Procedures, Operative
20.
J Clin Nurs ; 29(7-8): 1094-1101, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31891437

ABSTRACT

AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of acupressure on intramuscular injection pain, satisfaction and vital signs. BACKGROUND: Pain at the injection site may lead to discomfort and may affect patients' compliance to treatment. DESIGN: This was a prospective, single-blind, crossover study. The study complied with the guidelines of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Checklist. METHODS: Seventy-two healthy volunteer university students received an intramuscular injection of 2 ml sterile saline (%0.9 NaCl) to the ventrogluteal site with and without acupressure on separate days in a random order following a standard procedure by the same investigator. Pain and satisfaction were assessed immediately after the injection with the visual analog scale (VAS) by a researcher blinded to the study. RESULTS: A total of 134 injections were analysed. The result of the study reveals that acupressure alleviates the severity of pain and increases the patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this research support that use of acupressure, which is easy and cost-effective, could reduce injection pain when performed on a specific point. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Safe and accurate administration of medications is one of the crucial responsibilities of nurses. Acupressure is a nonpharmacologic approach, which can be effective in decreasing the injection pain and increasing patient satisfaction.


Subject(s)
Acupressure/methods , Injections, Intramuscular/adverse effects , Pain Management/methods , Pain, Procedural/therapy , Adult , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Single-Blind Method
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL