ABSTRACT
Improving teamwork among mental health practitioners is crucial. However, there have been few intervention studies on teamwork enhancement among community mental health practitioners in South Korea. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of the Team Building Circle program (TBC) based on the restorative justice paradigm, which sought to promote integration and cohesion. The TBC was developed to improve conflict interpretation mind-set, interpersonal skills, and teamwork among practitioners in community mental health centers. We conducted a quasi-experimental study using a pre and posttest design with a non-equivalent control group. The participants were 44 practitioners from four community mental health centers. Data were collected before the implementation TBC (pretest), just after (posttest), and 3 months after TBC (follow-up test). A generalized estimating equation model was used for analysis. Our findings indicate that the intervention group had improved scores in the ability to cope with interpersonal stress in a constructive way, interpersonal relationship skills, and teamwork compared to the control group. To improve teamwork among community mental health practitioners, managers are encouraged to consider providing TBC intervention.
Subject(s)
Cooperative Behavior , Interprofessional Relations , Patient Care Team , Humans , Female , Male , Republic of Korea , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Adult , Community Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Interpersonal Relations , Middle Aged , Adaptation, Psychological , Community Mental Health Centers/organization & administration , Social SkillsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Clinical errors in intensive care units (ICUs) are consistently attributed to communication errors. Despite its importance for patient safety and quality in critical care settings, few studies consider interprofessional communication as more than the basic exchange of information. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of interprofessional communication in ICUs to (1) characterize how communication is defined and measured and (2) identify contributions the field of health communication can make to team communication in ICUs. Through a series of queries in PubMed and Communication and Mass Media Complete databases, we identified and compared persistent gaps in how communication is framed and theorized in 28 publications from health services and 6 from social science outlets. We identified research priorities and suggested strategies for discussing communication more holistically in future health services research. RESULTS: 34 articles published from 1999 to 2021 were included. Six explicitly defined communication. Six were published in social science journals, but none were authored by a communication studies scholar. Half of the articles addressed communication as a transaction focused on information transfer, and the other half addressed communication as a process. CONCLUSIONS: Methodological implications are identified with the intent to encourage future interdisciplinary collaboration for studying communication in ICUs. We discuss the importance of (1) using language to describe communication that facilitates interdisciplinary engagement, (2) prioritizing communication as a process and using qualitative methods to provide insight, and (3) engaging health communication theories and experts to assist in developing more fruitful research questions and designs.
Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units , Interprofessional Relations , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Humans , Communication , Patient Care Team/organization & administrationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A surgical team works in a high-performance environment and is exposed to stress. Mindfulness practice is evidenced to reduce symptoms of stress, as well as burnout, which is high amongst health workers. The operating theatre is unique, with many job-roles, needs and time-critical tasks. It is plausible that group mindfulness may benefit the surgical team. This evaluates the take-5 theatre brief, consisting of a 'check-in' and short breathwork, when used by two surgical teams as part of the regular theatre team brief. APPROACH: The take-5 theatre brief was evaluated using domains of acceptability and implementation. Data were collected at two district general hospitals in the United Kingdom using 5-point Likert scales hosted on electronic surveys Thematic analysis was performed of participant voice notes, strategic meeting notes and transcripts of interviews between key informants. EVALUATION: There were 17 participants. Ten were from site A (59%), with the remainder being from site B (41%) and covered a range of roles within the theatre team. Participants found the take-5 theatre brief helpful (median Likert 5) and felt that it would benefit themselves (median Likert 5) as well as the team (median Likert 5) and that it fitted into the day easily (median Likert 4). There was a high demand, no financial investment was required and overall it was easy to implement; however, it became challenged in theatre lists that were late to start. IMPLICATION: The take-5 theatre brief is an acceptable initiative for these two operating theatre teams.
Subject(s)
Mindfulness , Operating Rooms , Humans , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , United Kingdom , Burnout, Professional/prevention & controlSubject(s)
Cardiology Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Coronary Care Units/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Cooperative Behavior , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Interpersonal Relations , Patient SafetyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Integrated primary care teams are ideally positioned to support the mental health care needs arising during the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding how COVID-19 has affected mental health care delivery within primary care settings will be critical to inform future policy and practice decisions during the later phases of the pandemic and beyond. The objective of our study was to describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on primary care teams' delivery of mental health care. METHODS: A qualitative study using focus groups conducted with primary care teams in Ontario, Canada. Focus group data was analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: We conducted 11 focus groups with 10 primary care teams and a total of 48 participants. With respect to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health care in primary care teams, we identified three key themes: i) the high demand for mental health care, ii) the rapid transformation to virtual care, and iii) the impact on providers. CONCLUSIONS: From the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, primary care quickly responded to the rising mental health care demands of their patients. Despite the numerous challenges they faced with the rapid transition to virtual care, primary care teams have persevered. It is essential that policy and decision-makers take note of the toll that these demands have placed on providers. There is an immediate need to enhance primary care's capacity for mental health care for the duration of the pandemic and beyond.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Mental Health Services , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Primary Health Care , Telemedicine , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/psychology , Female , Focus Groups , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Male , Mental Health/trends , Mental Health Services/standards , Mental Health Services/supply & distribution , Ontario/epidemiology , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Primary Health Care/methods , Primary Health Care/trends , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine/methods , Telemedicine/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Access to safe, high-quality surgical care in sub-Saharan Africa is a critical gap. Interventions to improve surgical quality have been developed, but research on their implementation is still at a nascent stage. We retrospectively applied the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment framework to characterize the implementation of Safe Surgery 2020, a multicomponent intervention to improve surgical quality. METHODS: We used a longitudinal, qualitative research design to examine Safe Surgery 2020 in 10 health facilities in Tanzania's Lake Zone. We used documentation analysis with confirmatory key informant interviews (n = 6) to describe the exploration and preparation phases. We conducted interviews with health facility leaders and surgical team members at 1, 6, and 12 months (n = 101) post initiation to characterize the implementation phase. Data were analyzed using the constant comparison method. RESULTS: In the exploration phase, research, expert consultation, and scoping activities revealed the need for a multicomponent intervention to improve surgical quality. In the preparation phase, onsite visits identified priorities and barriers to implementation to adapt the intervention components and curriculum. In the active implementation phase, 4 themes related to the inner organizational context-vision for safe surgery, existing surgical practices, leadership support, and resilience-and 3 themes related to the intervention-innovation-value fit, holistic approach, and buy-in-facilitated or hindered implementation. Interviewees perceived improvements in teamwork and communication and intra- and inter-facility learning, and their need to deliver safe surgery evolved during the implementation period. CONCLUSIONS: Examining implementation through the exploration, preparation, implementation, and sustainment phases offers insights into the implementation of interventions to improve surgical quality and promote sustainability.
Subject(s)
Evidence-Based Medicine/organization & administration , Health Plan Implementation/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Surgical Procedures, Operative/education , Humans , Leadership , Longitudinal Studies , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Patient Safety , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Qualitative Research , Quality Improvement , Retrospective Studies , Surgeons/education , Surgical Procedures, Operative/adverse effects , Sustainable Development , TanzaniaABSTRACT
GENERAL PURPOSE: To introduce the 15 recommendations of the International Ostomy Guideline (IOG) 2020, covering the four key arenas of education, holistic aspects, and pre- and postoperative care; and to summarize key concepts for clinicians to customize for translation into their practice. TARGET AUDIENCE: This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses with an interest in skin and wound care. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES: After participating in this educational activity, the participant will:1. Analyze supporting evidence for the education recommendations in the IOG 2020.2. Identify a benefit of the International Charter of Ostomate Rights.3. Distinguish concepts related to pre- and postoperative ostomy-related care.4. Select a potential barrier to IOG 2020 guideline implementation.
The second edition of the WCET ® International Ostomy Guideline (IOG) was launched in December 2020 as an update to the original guideline published in 2014. The purpose of this article is to introduce the 15 recommendations covering four key arenas (education, holistic aspects, and pre- and postoperative care) and summarize key concepts for clinicians to customize for translation into their practice. The article also includes information about the impact of the novel coronavirus 2019 on ostomy care.
Subject(s)
Health Personnel/education , Ostomy/rehabilitation , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Humans , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Skin Care/methods , Wound HealingABSTRACT
There is a persistent variation in cancer outcomes among and within European countries suggesting (among other causes) inequalities in access to or delivery of high-quality cancer care. European policy (EU Cancer Mission and Europe's Beating Cancer Plan) is currently moving towards a mission-oriented approach addressing these inequalities. In this study, we used the quantitative and qualitative data of the Organisation of European Cancer Institutes' Accreditation and Designation Programme, relating to 40 large European cancer centres, to describe their current compliance with quality standards, to identify the hallmarks common to all centres and to show the distinctive features of Comprehensive Cancer Centres. All Comprehensive Cancer Centres and Cancer Centres accredited by the Organisation of European Cancer Institutes show good compliance with quality standards related to care, multidisciplinarity and patient centredness. However, Comprehensive Cancer Centres on average showed significantly better scores on indicators related to the volume, quality and integration of translational research, such as high-impact publications, clinical trial activity (especially in phase I and phase IIa trials) and filing more patents as early indicators of innovation. However, irrespective of their size, centres show significant variability regarding effective governance when functioning as entities within larger hospitals.
Subject(s)
Cancer Care Facilities , Neoplasms/therapy , Quality of Health Care , Academies and Institutes/standards , Academies and Institutes/statistics & numerical data , Biomedical Research/organization & administration , Biomedical Research/standards , Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , Cancer Care Facilities/organization & administration , Cancer Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Cohort Studies , Europe/epidemiology , Humans , Medical Oncology/standards , Medical Oncology/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/standards , Patient Care Team/statistics & numerical data , Patient-Centered Care/organization & administration , Patient-Centered Care/standards , Patient-Centered Care/statistics & numerical data , Translational Research, Biomedical/methods , Translational Research, Biomedical/organization & administration , Translational Research, Biomedical/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
The aims were to develop an integrated electronic medication reconciliation (ieMR) platform, evaluate its effects on preventing potential duplicated medications, analyze the distribution of the potential duplicated medications by the Anatomical Therapeutic and Chemical (ATC) code for all inpatients, and determine the rate of 30-day medication-related hospital revisits for a geriatric unit. The study was conducted in a tertiary medical center in Taiwan and involved a retrospective quasi pre-intervention (July 1-November 30, 2015) and post-intervention (October 1-December 31, 2016) study design. A multidisciplinary team developed the ieMR platform covering the process from admission to discharge. The ieMR platform included six modules of an enhanced computer physician order entry system (eCPOE), Pharmaceutical-care, Holistic Care, Bedside Display, Personalized Best Possible Medication Discharge Plan, and Pharmaceutical Care Registration System. The ieMR platform prevented the number of potential duplicated medications from pre (25,196 medications, 2.3%) to post (23,413 medications, 3.8%) phases (OR 1.71, 95% CI, 1.68-1.74; p < .001). The most common potential duplicated medications classified by the ATC codes were cardiovascular system (28.4%), alimentary tract and metabolism (26.4%), and nervous system (14.9%), and by chemical substances were sennoside (12.5%), amlodipine (7.5%), and alprazolam (7.4%). The rate of medication-related 30-day hospital revisits for the geriatric unit was significantly decreased in post-intervention compared with that in pre-intervention (OR = 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03-0.53; p < .01). This study indicated that the ieMR platform significantly prevented the number of potential duplicated medications for inpatients and reduced the rate of 30-day medication-related hospital revisits for the patients on the geriatric unit.
Subject(s)
Continuity of Patient Care/organization & administration , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Medication Reconciliation/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Pharmaceutical Preparations/standards , Medical Order Entry Systems/organization & administration , Medical Records Systems, Computerized/organization & administration , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Retrospective Studies , TaiwanABSTRACT
In summarizing the proceedings of a longitudinal meeting of experts in substance use disorders (SUDs) among young adults, this special article reviews principles of care concerning recovery support services for this population. Young adults in recovery from SUDs can benefit from a variety of support services throughout the process of recovery. These services take place in both traditional clinical settings and settings outside the health system, and they can be delivered by a wide variety of nonprofessional and paraprofessional individuals. In this article, we communicate fundamental points related to guidance, evidence, and clinical considerations about 3 basic principles for recovery support services: (1) given their developmental needs, young adults affected by SUDs should have access to a wide variety of recovery support services regardless of the levels of care they need, which could range from early intervention services to medically managed intensive inpatient services; (2) the workforce for addiction services for young adults benefits from the inclusion of individuals with lived experience in addiction; and (3) recovery support services should be integrated to promote recovery most effectively and provide the strongest possible social support.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Health Services Accessibility , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Psychosocial Support Systems , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Activities of Daily Living , Consensus Development Conferences as Topic , Episode of Care , Evidence-Based Medicine , Health Resources , Housing , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Mental Health Recovery , United States , United States Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Like with all cancers, multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings are the norm in bone and soft tissue tumour (BST) management too. Problem in attendance of specialists due to geographical location is the one of the key barriers to effective functioning of MDTs. To overcome this problem, virtual MDTs involving videoconferencing or telemedicine have been proposed, but however this has been seldom used and tested. The COVID-19 pandemic forced the implementation of virtual MDTs in the Oxford sarcoma service in order to maintain normal service provision. We conducted a survey among the participants to evaluate its efficacy. METHODS: An online questionnaire comprising of 24 questions organised into 4 sections was circulated among all participants of the MDT after completion of 8 virtual MDTs. Opinions were sought comparing virtual MDTs to the conventional face-to-face MDTs on various aspects. A total of 36 responses were received and were evaluated. RESULTS: 72.8% were satisfied with the depth of discussion in virtual MDTs and 83.3% felt that the decision-making in diagnosis had not changed following the switch from face-to-face MDTs. About 86% reported to have all essential patient data was available to make decisions and 88.9% were satisfied with the time for discussion of patient issues over virtual platform. Three-fourths of the participants were satisfied (36.1% - highly satisfied; 38.9% - moderately satisfied) with virtual MDTs and 55.6% of them were happy to attend MDTs only by the virtual platform in the future. Regarding future, 77.8% of the participants opined that virtual MDTs would be the future of cancer care and an overwhelming majority (91.7%) felt that the present exercise would serve as a precursor to global MDTs involving specialists from abroad in the future. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that the forced switch to virtual MDTs in sarcoma care following the unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic to be a viable and effective alternative to conventional face-to-face MDTs. With effective and efficient software in place, virtual MDTs would also facilitate in forming extended MDTs in seeking opinions on complex cases from specialists abroad and can expand cancer care globally.
Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/therapy , COVID-19 , Interdisciplinary Communication , Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Muscle Neoplasms/therapy , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Sarcoma/therapy , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Videoconferencing/organization & administration , Attitude of Health Personnel , Attitude to Computers , Bone Neoplasms/diagnosis , Clinical Decision-Making , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Muscle Neoplasms/diagnosis , Sarcoma/diagnosis , Tertiary Care CentersABSTRACT
While recent medical advances have led to cure, remission, or long-term disease control for patients with hematologic malignancy, many still portend poor prognoses, and frequently are associated with significant symptom and quality of life burden for patients and families. Patients with hematological cancer are referred to palliative care (PC) services less often than those with solid tumors, despite higher inpatient mortality and shorter interval between first consultation and death. The complexity of individual prognostication, ongoing therapeutic goals of cure, the technical nature and complications of treatment, the intensity of medical care even when approaching end of life, and the speed of change to a terminal event all pose difficulties and hinder referral. A modified palliative care model is an unmet need in hemato-oncology, where PC is introduced early from the diagnosis of hematological malignancy, provided alongside care of curative or life-prolonging intent, and subsequently leads to death and bereavement care or cure and survivorship care depending on disease course. From current evidence, the historical prioritization of cancer care at the center of palliative medicine did not guarantee that those diagnosed with a hematological malignancy were assured of referral, timely or otherwise. Hopefully, this article can be a catalyst for debate that will foster a new direction in integration of clinical service and research, and subspecialty development at the interface of hemato-oncology and palliative care.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Medical Oncology , Palliative Care , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Continuity of Patient Care/organization & administration , Continuity of Patient Care/standards , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/methods , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/standards , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Medical Oncology/methods , Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Medical Oncology/standards , Palliative Care/methods , Palliative Care/organization & administration , Palliative Care/standards , Patient Care Team/standards , Referral and Consultation/organization & administration , Referral and Consultation/standardsABSTRACT
Child life programs are an important component of pediatric hospital-based care; they address the psychosocial concerns that accompany hospitalization and other health care experiences. Child life specialists focus on the optimal development and well-being of infants, children, adolescents, and young adults while promoting coping skills and minimizing the adverse effects of hospitalization, health care encounters, and/or other potentially stressful experiences. In collaboration with the entire health care team and family, child life specialists provide interventions that include therapeutic play, expressive modalities, and psychological preparation to facilitate coping and normalization at times and under circumstances that might otherwise prove overwhelming for the child. Play and developmentally appropriate communication are used to (1) promote optimal development, (2) educate children and families about health conditions, (3) prepare children and partner with families for medical events or procedures, (4) plan and rehearse useful coping and pain-management strategies with patients and families, (5) help children work through feelings about past or impending experiences, and (6) partner with families to establish therapeutic relationships between patients, siblings, and caregivers. Child life specialists collaborate with the entire interdisciplinary team to promote coping and enhance the overall health care experience for patients and families.
Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Child, Hospitalized/psychology , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Pediatrics/organization & administration , Social Support , Benchmarking , Child , Hospitalization , Humans , Pain Management , Play Therapy , Professional-Family RelationsABSTRACT
Peripheral intravenous catheters are frequently used devices in emergency departments. Many patients now present with difficult anatomy and are labeled as difficult intravenous access patients. A common technology to address this challenge is ultrasound. While studies have examined the ability to train emergency staff, few have addressed how this should be done and the outcomes associated with such training. No studies were found with dedicated vascular access specialist teams in emergency departments. An emergency department vascular access specialist team was formed at a hospital in Bangor, Maine, United States to train, validate, and proctor clinicians with ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous devices. A quality review of this process was compiled and determined that appropriate clinicians with dedicated training and guidance can achieve higher levels of procedural success. Furthermore, evidence substantiates that frequent practice is linked to a higher quality of care and that a significant need for such teams is present. This review examines how a team was implemented and its impact both department- and facility-wide. It is possible that hospitals benefit from the services of vascular access specialists to provide higher quality care. Successful implementation of such specialist teams requires foundational knowledge and skills in vascular access with ongoing quality measures to ensure competency and compliance with evidence-based practices.
Subject(s)
Catheterization, Peripheral , Clinical Competence , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Humans , Maine , Program Development , Program Evaluation , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Quality Indicators, Health Care/organization & administrationSubject(s)
COVID-19/therapy , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Health Services Needs and Demand/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/organization & administration , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/therapy , Female , Humans , Models, Organizational , Needs Assessment/organization & administration , Pregnancy , Risk Management , WorkflowABSTRACT
Physicians and other health care workers sometimes face thoughts and systems that are utterly strange to them. This articles argues that 'medical hypes' deserve to be taken seriously, because they contribute to keeping the health care system and society at large vital.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Health Personnel/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Humans , National Health ProgramsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To understand how health systems are facilitating primary care redesign (PCR), examine the PCR initiatives taking place within systems, and identify barriers to this work. STUDY SETTING: A purposive sample of 24 health systems in 4 states. STUDY DESIGN: Data were systematically reviewed to identify how system leaders define and implement initiatives to redesign primary care delivery and identify challenges. Researchers applied codes which were based on the theoretical PCR literature and created new codes to capture emerging themes. Investigators analyzed coded data then produced and applied a thematic analysis to examine how health systems facilitate PCR. DATA COLLECTION: Semi-structured telephone interviews with 162 system executives and physician organization leaders from 24 systems. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Leaders at all 24 health systems described initiatives to redesign the delivery of primary care, but many were in the early stages. Respondents described the use of centralized health system resources to facilitate PCR initiatives, such as regionalized care coordinators, and integrated electronic health records. Team-based care, population management, and care coordination were the most commonly described initiatives to transform primary care delivery. Respondents most often cited improving efficiency and enhancing clinician job satisfaction, as motivating factors for team-based care. Changes in payment and risk assumption as well as community needs were commonly cited motivators for population health management and care coordination. Return on investment and the slower than anticipated rate in moving from fee-for-service to value-based payment were noted by multiple respondents as challenges health systems face in redesigning primary care. CONCLUSIONS: Given their expanding role in health care and the potential to leverage resources, health systems are promising entities to promote the advancement of PCR. Systems demonstrate interest and engagement in this work but face significant challenges in getting to scale until payment models are in alignment with these efforts.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Continuity of Patient Care/organization & administration , Efficiency, Organizational , Electronic Health Records/organization & administration , Humans , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement , Job Satisfaction , Motivation , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Risk Management/organization & administrationSubject(s)
Cardio-Renal Syndrome/therapy , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Heart Diseases/therapy , Metabolic Diseases/therapy , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Cardio-Renal Syndrome/diagnosis , Cardio-Renal Syndrome/economics , Cardio-Renal Syndrome/physiopathology , Cooperative Behavior , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/economics , Health Care Costs , Healthcare Disparities/organization & administration , Heart Diseases/diagnosis , Heart Diseases/economics , Heart Diseases/physiopathology , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Metabolic Diseases/diagnosis , Metabolic Diseases/economics , Metabolic Diseases/physiopathology , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diagnosis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/economics , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/physiopathology , Stakeholder ParticipationABSTRACT
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer mortality, but unlike other leading causes of cancer death, HCC is increasing in mortality and burden of management. Management of HCC is unique because it usually arises in a diseased liver, which itself may be a driver of mortality. Multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) for the management of complex diseases are becoming more common, but are especially needed in the management of patients with HCC. Liver cancer MDTs are used in most centers providing comprehensive care for patients with HCC, and should be considered the standard of care for these patients.
Subject(s)
Adenoma, Liver Cell/therapy , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Standard of Care , Artificial Intelligence , Disease Management , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Prior literature suggests after-hours delay leads to poor functional outcomes in stroke patients undergoing thrombectomy. We aimed to evaluate the impact of time of presentation on mechanical thrombectomy (MT) metrics and its association with long-term functional outcome in an Interventional Radiology (IR) suite equipped operating room (OR) setting. METHODS: Retrospective review of prospectively maintained database on all stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy between January 2015 and December 2018 at our CSC. Work hours were defined by official OR work hours (Monday-Friday 7 AM and 5 PM) and after-hours as between 5 PM and 7 AM during weekdays and weekends as well as official hospital holidays. Primary outcome was 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Secondary outcomes included door to groin puncture time and procedural complications. RESULTS: A total of 315 patients were included in the analyses. 209 (66.4%) received mechanical thrombectomy after hours and 106 (33.6%) during work hours. There was no difference in the shift distribution of functional outcome on the mRS at 90 days (OR: 1.14, CI: 0.72-1.78, p=0.58) and the percentage of patients achieving functional independence (mRS 0-2) at 90 days (43.1% vs. 41.3%; p=0.83) between the after hour and work hour groups respectively. Similarly, there was no difference in median door to groin times and procedural complications among both groups, with significant year on year improvement in overall time metrics. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that undergoing MT during off-hours had similar functional outcomes when compared to MT during working hours in an OR setting. The after-hours deleterious effect might disappear when MT is performed in a system with 24-hours in-house Anesthesia and IR tech services.