Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 891
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Explore (NY) ; 20(5): 102997, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38582711

ABSTRACT

Hispanics are 18.7 % of the U.S. population, and people of Mexican origin are 61.4 % of that Hispanic community. National health surveys indicate that utilization of traditional medicine among Hispanics is low compared to non-Hispanic Whites. However, many researchers have described their use in Hispanic populations as commonplace. OBJECTIVE: This review analyzed studies about traditional healing practices from Mexico (THPM) used by women of Mexican origin in the U.S. for a greater understanding of traditional health practices within U.S. communities of Mexican origin. DATA SOURCES: Journal databases were searched for studies between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 2020. STUDY SELECTION: The Whittemore and Knafl and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) methods were used to analyze the studies. DATA EXTRACTION: Seven themes emerged: A) foundations, B) medical pluralism, C) non-disclosure and patient satisfaction, D) remedies and rituals, E) healers, F) affinity, and G) what clinicians need to know. Four subthemes were identified: G1) cultural sensitivity, G2) communication skills, G3) leveraging the influence of THPM, and G4) scientific inquiry. DATA SYNTHESIS: U.S. women of Mexican origin reported continued use of THPM for health promotion, influenced by their understanding of health and illness, community ties, and personal experiences. Study authors recommended strategies for improving patient-provider communication and understanding patients' use of traditional health and healing practices. CONCLUSION: Further explorations of THPM are needed to build awareness of culturally-tied health beliefs and behaviors that improve medical care experiences and quality for Hispanics of Mexican origin.


Subject(s)
Medicine, Traditional , Mexican Americans , Humans , Medicine, Traditional/statistics & numerical data , Medicine, Traditional/methods , Female , Mexico/ethnology , Mexican Americans/statistics & numerical data , Mexican Americans/psychology , United States , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data
2.
Altern Ther Health Med ; 30(9): 384-389, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38430138

ABSTRACT

Objective: To analyze the effect of holistic nursing intervention on the nursing quality and satisfaction of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: This is a retrospective study. 148 AMI patients admitted to the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine in our hospital were divided into a conventional group and an experimental group according to different nursing methods, with 74 patients in each group. Patients in the routine group were given routine nursing care, while those in the experimental group were given holistic nursing interventions. The nursing quality, the incidence of complications and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results: One year after discharge, the experimental group achieved a significantly higher LVEF than the routine group (P < .05). After nursing intervention, the Morisky scores in both groups were increased, and the increase values was greater in the experimental group vs. routine group with respect to body mass index (BMI) control, medication adherence prescribed by a doctor, proper exercise, diet control (all P < .05); the experimental group exhibited superior performance in terms of disease, physical, medical, general life, social and psychological status, and work conditions than the routine group (all P < .05). After nursing intervention, the GSES score of the experimental group (29.14±2.56) was significantly higher than that of the routine group (21.35±2.74) (P < .05). Furthermore, the incidences of AMI and stent thrombosis in the experimental group (1.35%, 1.35%) were lower than they were in the routine group (9.46%, 14.87%); higher total satisfaction was observed in the experimental group vs. the routine group [71 (95.95%) vs. 53 (71.62%)] (P < .05). Conclusion: Holistic nursing intervention emerges as a promising care strategy for AMI patients, demonstrating potential in enhancing treatment adherence, improving quality of life, fostering self-efficacy, and making positive contributions to prognosis and cardiac function. The observed effectiveness and safety profiles highlight the feasibility of this approach. In real-world clinical settings, the implementation of holistic nursing interventions may lead to improved adherence to treatment plans and an overall elevation in healthcare quality.


Subject(s)
Holistic Nursing , Myocardial Infarction , Patient Satisfaction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/nursing , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Holistic Nursing/methods , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Aged
3.
Altern Ther Health Med ; 30(10): 332-335, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38330586

ABSTRACT

Background: Chest pain, a sudden and perilous symptom, is frequently encountered in the emergency department. Prompt and efficient first-aid measures and nursing interventions are crucial for effectively rescuing emergency patients experiencing chest pain. Objective: This study aims to investigate the impact of an enhanced emergency nursing process on the rescue outcomes of emergency patients with chest pain. Design: A randomized controlled study was conducted. Setting: The research was conducted at Suzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine. Participants: A total of 90 emergency chest pain patients admitted between December 2021 and June 2022 were selected and divided into two groups, with 45 cases in each group. Interventions: The control group received routine emergency nursing, while the observation group underwent an improved emergency nursing protocol. Primary Outcome Measures: (1) Treatment initiation time, emergency rescue time, recovery time of vital signs, and hospital stay; (2) curative effect; (3) pain scores; (4) incidence of adverse events; and (5) patient satisfaction. Results: Compared to the control group, the observation group exhibited shorter treatment initiation time, emergency rescue time, recovery time of vital signs, and hospital stay (P < .05). The effective rate in the observation group was higher (P < .05), and pain scores were lower at 30 min, 60 min, 120 min, and 240 min post-rescue (P < .05). The occurrence of adverse events was reduced in the observation group (P = .005), and patient satisfaction was higher at discharge (P < .05). Conclusion: The enhanced emergency nursing process effectively reduces the clinical rescue time for emergency patients with chest pain, enhances rescue efficiency, seizes crucial opportunities for saving lives, and improves patient satisfaction. These findings have significant positive implications for clinical applications.


Subject(s)
Chest Pain , Humans , Chest Pain/therapy , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Adult , Emergency Nursing/methods , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Process , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Clin Nurs ; 33(10): 4005-4013, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38308404

ABSTRACT

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine the relationship between perceptions of nursing presence and intensive care experiences in adult intensive care unit patients'. BACKGROUND: Intensive care units (ICUs) are settings where patients have many negative emotions and experiences, which affect both treatment and post-discharge outcomes. The holistic presence of nurses may help patients turn their negative emotions and experiences into positive ones. DESIGN: A descriptive-correlational design was used and reported according to the STROBE checklist. METHODS: The sample consisted of 182 participants. Data were collected using a personal information form, the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), the Intensive Care Experience Scale (ICES), and the Presence of Nursing Scale (PONS). RESULTS: A strong positive correlation existed between total ICES and PONS scores (r = 0.889, p < 0.001). There was a strong positive correlation between PONS total score and ICES subscales (awareness of surroundings (r = 0.751, p < 0.001), frightening experiences (r = 0.770, p < 0.001), recall of experience (r = 0.774, p < 0.001), and satisfaction with care (r = 0.746, p < 0.001)). Males (ß = -0.139, p < 0.05), and patients who were university and higher education graduate (ß = 0.137, p < 0.05) had higher positive ICU experiences. It was also found length of ICU stay was correlated with ICU experiences and nursing presence. CONCLUSIONS: The more positively the patients perceive nurses, the better ICU experiences they have. Gender and education level were found determinants of adult ICU patients' experiences. ICU length of stay predicted what kind of experience patients have and how much they feel the presence of nurses. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses should make their presence felt completely and holistically by using their communication skills for patients have more positive intensive care experiences. Nurses should consider variables which affects patients' ICU experiences and nursing presence.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Critical Care/psychology , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Nurse-Patient Relations , Critical Care Nursing , Surveys and Questionnaires , Perception
5.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities ; 10(4): 1878-1898, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35913545

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: LatinX populations are rapidly growing in the USA, but still report lower levels of patient centered care and satisfaction when compared to their non-LatinX white counterparts. This review encompasses literature which describes patient experience instruments that (1) evaluate LatinX experience, (2) have validated Spanish versions, or (3) measure language-concordant care experiences. METHODS: A scoping review of literature in Ovid Medline, CINAHL, and PsycINFO was conducted. Articles were excluded if they were not applicable to the health care industry, did not include a patient experience instrument, or did not include LatinX or Spanish-speaking individuals within their study population. Data extraction was performed for concepts measured, study size, population, health care setting, and languages validated. RESULTS: This review identified 224 manuscripts. Of these, 81 met full inclusion criteria and represented 60 unique instruments. These covered six categories: general patient experience (43%, n = 26/60), experiences of discrimination/mistrust (12%, n = 7/60), cultural factors (10%, n = 6/60), patient-provider relationship (10%, n = 6/60), and communication (8%, n = 5/60). The remaining instruments measured multiple categories (17%, n = 10/60). Just over one third of instruments (n = 24, 5 pediatric, 19 adult) were validated in Spanish and an additional 14 (23%) were validated in English alone. Finally, 4 (7%) instruments were identified which were developed for use in a language concordant setting. CONCLUSION: Many instruments were identified which evaluate LatinX patient experience; however, none was both validated in Spanish and measured in all key categories of experience described above. Additionally, few instruments were developed for holistic evaluation of patient experience in pediatric or language concordant care settings.


Subject(s)
Communication , Health Services Accessibility , Hispanic or Latino , Language , Patient Satisfaction , Patient-Centered Care , Adult , Child , Humans , Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Patient Satisfaction/ethnology , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Patient-Centered Care/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology
6.
PLoS One ; 17(2): e0263453, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35167583

ABSTRACT

Keloid scars are characterized by the excessive proliferation of fibroblasts and an imbalance between the production and degradation of collagen, leading to its buildup in the dermis. There is no "gold standard" treatment for this condition, and the recurrence is frequent after surgical procedures removal. In vitro studies have demonstrated that photobiomodulation (PBM) using the blue wavelength reduces the proliferation speed and the number of fibroblasts as well as the expression of TGF-ß. There are no protocols studied and established for the treatment of keloids with blue LED. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine the effects of the combination of PBM with blue light and the intralesional administration of the corticoid triamcinolone hexacetonide on the quality of the remaining scar by Vancouver Scar Scale in the postoperative period of keloid surgery. A randomized, controlled, double-blind, clinical trial will be conducted involving two groups: 1) Sham (n = 29): intralesional administration of corticoid (IAC) and sham PBM in the preoperative and postoperative periods of keloid removal surgery; and 2) active PBM combined with IAC (n = 29) in the preoperative and postoperative periods of keloid removal surgery. Transcutaneous PBM will be performed on the keloid region in the preoperative period and on the remaining scar in the postoperative period using blue LED (470 nm, 400 mW, 4J per point on 10 linear points). The patients will answer two questionnaires: one for the assessment of quality of life (Qualifibro-UNIFESP) and one for the assessment of satisfaction with the scar (PSAQ). The team of five plastic surgeons will answer the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). All questionnaires will be administered one, three, six, and twelve months postoperatively. The keloids will be molded in silicone prior to the onset of treatment and prior to excision to assess pre-treatment and post-treatment size. The same will be performed for the remaining scar at one, three, six, and twelve months postoperatively. The removed keloid will be submitted to histopathological analysis for the determination of the quantity of fibroblasts, the organization and distribution of collagen (picrosirius staining), and the genic expression of TGF-ß (qPCR). All data will be submitted to statistical analysis. Trial registration: This study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04824612).


Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Keloid/therapy , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life/psychology , Triamcinolone Acetonide/analogs & derivatives , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/pharmacology , Adult , Combined Modality Therapy , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Injections, Intralesional , Keloid/metabolism , Keloid/psychology , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Care , Preoperative Care , Prospective Studies , Transforming Growth Factor beta/metabolism , Treatment Outcome , Triamcinolone Acetonide/administration & dosage , Triamcinolone Acetonide/pharmacology , Young Adult
7.
J Gen Intern Med ; 37(4): 847-852, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34982370

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Information about telehealth versus in-office visits and how patient experience before compared to during the COVID-19 pandemic is important for healthcare planning. OBJECTIVE: To compare patient experience by visit type and before and during the pandemic. DESIGN: Survey of patients assessing ambulatory care before and during the pandemic. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 58,500 adult patients (13,928 primary care and 44,581 specialty physician visits) at a large integrated health system with 197 clinics on the west coast of the United States. The majority were female (59%), 55 or older (65%), and non-Hispanic White (55%), and had an in-office visit (87%) while 10% had a tele-video and 3% a phone visit. MAIN MEASURES: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Survey 3.0 doctor communication, care coordination, access, and office staff composites; an overall rating of the doctor; and whether the patient would recommend the doctor to family and friends. KEY RESULTS: Patient experience with telehealth visits was as positive as or more positive than that with traditional office-based visits. Doctor communication on tele-video visits was viewed as slightly more positive than that of in-office or phone visits. Tele-video visits were also slightly more positive than in-office visits for care coordination, overall rating of the doctor, and willingness to recommend to family and friends. Office staff were viewed less positively on the phone than tele-video or in-office visits. Patient experience was similar before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (e.g., on a 0-100 possible range with a higher score being better, doctor communication was 94.4 before and 94.9 during). CONCLUSIONS: The positive experiences with telehealth, especially tele-video, may be due to patient appreciation of efforts made to maintain access, the focused nature of telehealth visits, and help by staff for navigation technical issues. Lessons learned about delivering responsive telehealth care can be used to ensure high-quality care after the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Patient Satisfaction , Telemedicine , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Pandemics , Patient Outcome Assessment , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology
8.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(11): e2129647, 2021 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34724555

ABSTRACT

Importance: Randomized clinical trials in prostate cancer have reported noninferior outcomes for hypofractionated radiation therapy (HRT) compared with conventional RT (CRT); however, uptake of HRT across jurisdictions is variable. Objective: To evaluate the use of HRT vs CRT in men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer and compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at a population level. Design, Setting, and Participants: Registry-based cohort study from the Australian and New Zealand Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry (PCOR-ANZ). Participants were men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer treated with primary RT (excluding brachytherapy) from January 2016 to December 2019. Data were analyzed in March 2021. Exposures: HRT defined as 2.5 to 3.3 Gy and CRT defined as 1.7 to 2.3 Gy per fraction. Main Outcomes and Measures: Temporal trends and institutional, clinicopathological, and sociodemographic factors associated with use of HRT were analyzed. PROs were assessed 12 months following RT using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)-26 Short Form questionnaire. Differences in PROs were analyzed by adjusting for age and National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk category. Results: Of 8305 men identified as receiving primary RT, 6368 met the inclusion criteria for CRT (n = 4482) and HRT (n = 1886). The median age was 73.1 years (IQR, 68.2-77.3 years), 2.6% (168) had low risk, 45.7% (2911) had intermediate risk, 44.5% (2836) had high-/very high-risk, and 7.1% (453) had regional nodal disease. Use of HRT increased from 2.1% (9 of 435) in the first half of 2016 to 52.7% (539 of 1023) in the second half of 2019, with lower uptake in the high-/very high-risk (1.9% [4 of 215] to 42.4% [181 of 427]) compared with the intermediate-risk group (2.2% [4 of 185] to 67.6% [325 of 481]) (odds ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.15-0.45). Substantial variability in the use of HRT for intermediate-risk disease remained at the institutional level (median 53.3%; range, 0%-100%) and clinician level (median 57.9%; range, 0%-100%) in the last 2 years of the study period. There were no clinically significant differences across EPIC-26 urinary and bowel functional domains or bother scores. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, use of HRT for prostate cancer increased substantially from 2016. This population-level data demonstrated clinically equivalent PROs and supports the continued implementation of HRT into routine practice. The wide variation in practice observed at the jurisdictional, institutional, and clinician level provides stakeholders with information that may be useful in targeting implementation strategies and benchmarking services.


Subject(s)
Patient Satisfaction , Prostatic Neoplasms/psychology , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Australia , Cohort Studies , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Humans , Male , New Zealand , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Registries , Treatment Outcome
9.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg ; 27(8): 469-473, 2021 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34397606

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the effect of music listening on preoperative anxiety compared with usual care in patients undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery. METHODS: Patients scheduled for pelvic reconstructive surgery were enrolled on the day of surgery. Participants were randomized to either the usual care (control group) or to music listening on headphones (music group) before their surgery. Participants completed the Spielberg State-Trait Anxiety Inventory form Y1 to measure baseline state anxiety levels before surgery and again after 30 minutes of usual care or music listening. The primary outcome was the change in state anxiety score as measured by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory form Y1. RESULTS: Sixty-nine women completed the study (35 assigned to the control group and 34 assigned to the music group). Analysis of the primary outcome included 66 participants (34 in the control group and 32 in the music group). Improvement in state anxiety was significantly better for patients assigned to music listening (-6.69; SD, 6.98) than for patients assigned to the control group (-1.32; SD, 8.03; P = 0.01). Six weeks postoperatively, patients in the music group (n = 29) reported higher overall satisfaction when compared with those in the control group (n = 31, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery present with moderate anxiety on the day of surgery. Allowing patients to listen to their preferred music is a simple intervention that may lower preoperative anxiety and improve satisfaction in this patient population.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/prevention & control , Music Therapy/methods , Pelvic Floor/surgery , Preoperative Care/methods , Aged , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Preoperative Care/psychology , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Plastic Surgery Procedures/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires
10.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(8): e2120052, 2021 08 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34374772

ABSTRACT

Importance: Cancer clinical trials (CCTs) provide patients an opportunity to receive experimental drugs, tests, and/or procedures that can lead to remission. For some, a CCT may seem like their only option. Little is known about experiences of patient-participants who withdraw or are withdrawn from CCTs. Objective: To examine patient-participants' experiences during withdrawal from CCTs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative, descriptive study used a semistructured interview designed specifically for it, with open-ended and probing questions. The study took place at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania. The need for a sample of 20 interviewees was determined by code and meaning saturation (ie, no new themes revealed and identified themes fully elaborated). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed with a qualitative software program. Data coded with the software were refined into categories reflecting broad themes. A criterion-based sampling approach was used to select a subset of adult patients with cancer who were former CCT participants and who agreed on exit from those CCTs to a later interview about withdrawal experiences. They were contacted one by one by telephone from September 2015 through June 2019 until 20 agreed. Data analysis was completed in October 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: Themes characterizing patient-participants' perceptions of their withdrawal experiences. Results: Respondents' mean (SD) age was 64.42 (8.49) years; 12 (63.2%) were men. Most respondents were White (18 respondents [94.7%]) and college educated (11 respondents [55.0%]). Cancer stage data were available for 17 participants, 11 of whom (64.7%) had stage IV cancer at CCT enrollment. Thirteen respondents reported withdrawal as a result of disease progression, and 5 withdrew because of adverse effects. Other reasons for withdrawal included acute illness and participant uncertainty about the reason. Analysis of interview data yielded 5 themes: posttrial prognostic awareness, goals of care discussions, emotional coping, burden of adverse effects, and professional trust and support. Subthemes included regrets or hindsight, urgency to start next treatment, and weighing benefits and burdens of treatment. Limited discussions about patient-participants' immediate posttrial care needs left many feeling that there was no clear path forward. Conclusions and Relevance: Patient-participants transitioning from a CCT described feeling intense symptoms and emotions and awareness that their life span was short and options seemed to be limited. Communication that includes attention to posttrial needs is needed throughout the CCT to help patient-participants navigate posttrial steps. Research should focus on components of responsible and ethical CCT transitions, including types and timing of discussions and who should begin these discussions with patient-participants and their families.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Clinical Trials as Topic/psychology , Neoplasms/psychology , Patient Participation/psychology , Patient Participation/statistics & numerical data , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Stress, Psychological , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Qualitative Research
11.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 19(1): 147, 2021 May 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34001165

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The assessment of patient satisfaction during treatment is essential to provide patient-centered high-quality cancer care. Nevertheless, no German instrument assesses patient satisfaction with comprehensive cancer care, which not only includes oncological treatment, but also interpersonal quality of care as well as psychosocial support services. Based on the French REPERES-60, we developed the German Patient Satisfaction with Comprehensive Cancer Care (SCCC) questionnaire. METHODS: The REPERES-60 was translated and the items were adapted to make it applicable to the German healthcare system and across different tumor entities. Scales of the resulting instrument were extracted via principal axis factoring (PAF). Subsequently, we investigated the reliability (Cronbach's Alpha, CA), discriminatory power (corrected item-scale correlations) and convergent validity (pre-specified correlations of the SCCC with different outcomes). RESULTS: The SCCC consisted of 32 items which were subsequently tested among a sample of 333 patients across different tumor entities (response rate: 47%). Average age was 59 years (standard deviation: 14), 63% were male. PAF revealed four multi-item scales named Competence, Information, Access and Support accounting for 71% of the variance. Two single-items scales assess global satisfaction with medical and psychosocial care, respectively. CA across the multi-item scales ranged from .84 to .96. Discriminatory power was sufficiently high, with all r ≥ .5. Convergent validity was largely verified by negative associations of the four multi-item scales with depressive/anxious symptomatology (r ≥ - .18, p < .01) and fatigue/overall symptom burden (r ≥ - .14, p < .01). CONCLUSION: We developed a tool to assess patient satisfaction with comprehensive cancer care in Germany. The SCCC showed satisfactory psychometric properties. Further studies are needed to verify these preliminary findings.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/therapy , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Personal Satisfaction , Psychometrics/standards , Quality of Life/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , France , Germany , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Translations , Young Adult
12.
PLoS One ; 16(5): e0250546, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33945558

ABSTRACT

Recent changes in the medical paradigm highlight the importance of patient-centered communication. However, because of the lack of awareness of dental clinics and competency of medical personnel, the quality of medical services in terms of the communication between doctors and patients has not improved. This study analyzed the impact of health communication and medical service quality, service value, and patient satisfaction on the intention to revisit dental clinics. The study participants were outpatients treated at 10 dental clinics in Seoul. The research data were collected using a questionnaire during visits to these dental clinics from December 1 to December 30, 2016. A total of 600 questionnaires were distributed (60 copies to each clinics) and 570 valid questionnaires were used for the analysis. The influence of the factors was determined using structural equation modeling. The factors influencing service value were reliability (ß = 0.364, p < 0.001), expertise (ß = 0.319, p < 0.001), communication by doctors (ß = 0.224, p < 0.001), and tangibility (ß = 0.136, p < 0.05). In addition, the factors influencing patient satisfaction were reliability (ß = 0.258, p < 0.001), tangibility (ß = 0.192, p < 0.001), communication by doctors (ß = 0.163, p < 0.001), and expertise (ß = 0.122, p < 0.01). Further, service value (ß = 0.438, p < 0.001) raised patient satisfaction, which was found to influence the intention to revisit dental clinics (ß = 0.383, p < 0.001). Providing accurate medical services to inpatients based on smooth communication between doctors and patients improves patient satisfaction. In addition, doctors can build long-term relations with patients by increasing patients' intention to revisit through patient-oriented communication.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/standards , Dental Clinics/organization & administration , Dental Clinics/standards , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Communication , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Seoul , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
13.
Phys Ther ; 101(7)2021 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33848335

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 has widely affected delivery of health care. In response, telerehabilitation (TR) has emerged as alternative care model. Aims were: (1) to describe baseline patient characteristics and available unadjusted outcomes for episodes of care administered during COVID-19 using TR versus traditional in-person care, and (2) to describe TR frequency levels by condition and telecommunication modes. METHODS: A descriptive retrospective observational design was used to report patient variables and outcomes including physical function, number of visits, and patient satisfaction, by TR frequency (few, most, or all visits) and telecommunication modes. Standardized differences were used to compare baseline characteristics between episodes with and without TR. RESULTS: Sample consisted of 222,680 patients (59% female; mean [SD] age = 55 [18] years). Overall TR rate was 6% decreasing from 10% to 5% between second and third quarters of 2020. Outcome measures were available for 90% to 100% of episodes. Thirty-seven percent of clinicians administered care via TR. Patients treated using TR compared with in-person care were more likely to be younger and live in large metropolitan areas. From those with TR, 55%, 20%, and 25% had TR during few, most, or all visits, respectively. TR care was administered equally across orthopedic body parts, with lower use for nonorthopedic conditions such as stroke, edema, and vestibular dysfunction. TR was primarily administered using synchronous (video or audio) modes. The rate of patients reported being very satisfied with their treatment results was 3% higher for no TR compared with TR. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide new knowledge about to whom and how TR is being administered during the pandemic in outpatient rehabilitation practices throughout the United States. The database assessed was found to be suitable for conducting studies on associations between TR and diverse outcome measures, controlling for a comprehensive set of patient characteristics, to advance best TR care models, and promote high-quality care. IMPACT: This study provided detailed and robust descriptive information using an existing national patient database containing patient health and demographic characteristics, outcome measures, and telerehabilitation (TR) administration data. Findings support the feasibility to conduct future studies on associations between TR care and patient outcomes, adjusting for a wide range of patient characteristics and clinical setting factors that may be associated with the probability of receiving TR. The finding of limited and decreasing use of TR over the study period calls for studies aimed to better understand facilitators and inhibitors of TR use by rehabilitation therapists during everyday practice to promote its use when clinically appropriate.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life/psychology , Telerehabilitation/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
14.
PLoS One ; 16(4): e0248588, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33882059

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Midwifery continuity of care models for women at low and mixed risk of complications have been shown to improve women's experiences of care. However, there is limited research on care experiences among women at increased risk of preterm birth. We aimed to explore the experiences of care among women with risk factors for preterm birth participating in a pilot trial (POPPIE) of a midwifery continuity of care model which included a specialist obstetric clinic. METHODS: A total of 334 pregnant women identified at increased risk of preterm birth were randomly allocated to either midwifery continuity of care (POPPIE group) or standard maternity care. Women in both groups were followed up at six-to-eight weeks postpartum and were invited to complete a postnatal survey either online or by post. An equal status exploratory sequential mixed method design was chosen to collect and analyse the quantitative postnatal survey data and qualitative interviews data. The postnatal survey included measures of social support, trust, perceptions of safety, quality of care, control during childbirth, bonding and quality of life. Categorical data were analysed with chi-squared tests and continuous data were analysed with t-tests and/or Mann-Whitney U test to measure differences in measures scores among groups. The qualitative interview data were subjected to a thematic framework analysis. Data triangulation brought quantitative and qualitative data together at the interpretation stage. FINDINGS: A total of 166 women completed the survey and 30 women were interviewed (90 and 16 in POPPIE group; 76 and 14 in standard group). We found survey respondents in the POPPIE group, compared to respondents in the standard group, were significantly more likely to report greater trust in midwives (Mann-Whitney U, p<0.0001), greater perceptions of safety during the antenatal care (t-test, p = 0.0138), have a particular midwife to contact when they needed during their pregnancy (t-test, p<0.0001) and the postnatal period (chi-squared, p<0.0001). They reported increased involvement in decisions regarding antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal care (t-test, p = 0.002; p = 0.008; p = 0.006 respectively); and greater postnatal support and advice about: feeding the baby (chi-squared, p<0.0001), handling, settling and looking after the baby (chi-squared, p<0.0001), baby's health and progress (chi-squared, p = 0.039), their own health and recovery (chi-squared, p = 0.006) and who to contact about any emotional changes (chi-squared, p = 0.005). There were no significant differences between groups in the reporting of perceptions of safety during birth and the postnatal period, concerns raised during labour and birth taken seriously, being left alone during childbirth at a time of worries, control during labour, bonding, social support, and physical and mental health related quality of life after birth. Results from qualitative interviews provided insight and depth into many of these findings, with women in the POPPIE group reporting more positive experiences of bonding towards their babies and more positive physical health postnatally. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with standard maternity care, women at increased risk of PTB who received midwifery continuity of care were more likely to report increased perceptions of trust, safety and quality of care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN (Number: 37733900); UK CRN (ID: 31951).


Subject(s)
Maternal-Child Nursing/trends , Midwifery/trends , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Continuity of Patient Care/statistics & numerical data , Continuity of Patient Care/trends , Female , Humans , Maternal Health Services/trends , Maternal-Child Nursing/methods , Midwifery/methods , Obstetrics/methods , Obstetrics/trends , Pilot Projects , Postnatal Care/methods , Pregnancy , Pregnant Women , Premature Birth/prevention & control , Premature Birth/therapy , Prenatal Care/methods , Quality of Life , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom
15.
PLoS One ; 16(4): e0250999, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33914815

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Clinicians and healthcare organizations are ethically obligated to treat patients with respect, yet it is not clear what actions best demonstrate respect to patients. This exploratory qualitative study aimed to understand what actions on both an individual and organizational level effectively demonstrate respect for primary care patients. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with primary care patients in an integrated healthcare delivery system in Oregon and an integrated safety net health system in Colorado who were participating in a genomics implementation research study of a hereditary cancer screening program. We systematically coded interview transcripts using a coding framework developed based on iterative review of the interview guide and transcripts. We further analyzed the data coded with sub-codes relating to patients' experiences with respect in healthcare using a descriptive content analysis approach. RESULTS: We interviewed 40 English-speaking (n = 30, 75%) and Spanish-speaking (n = 10, 25%) patients. Most interviewees identified as female (n = 35, 88%) and either Hispanic/Latino(a) (n = 17, 43%) or White or European American (n = 15, 38%). Interviewees identified two categories of efforts by individual clinicians that demonstrate respect: engaging with patients and being transparent. They identified five efforts by healthcare organizations: promoting safety and inclusivity, protecting patient privacy, communicating about scheduling, navigating financial barriers to care, and ensuring continuity of care. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that patients' experiences of respect depend on efforts by individual clinicians as well as healthcare organizations. Our findings offer insight into how clinicians can build stronger partnerships with patients and how organizations can seek to promote access to care and patient safety and comfort. They also illustrate areas for future research and quality improvement to more effectively respect patients.


Subject(s)
Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Physician-Patient Relations/ethics , White People/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Colorado/ethnology , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Female , Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Oregon/ethnology , Patient Satisfaction/ethnology , Primary Health Care , Qualitative Research , White People/psychology , Young Adult
16.
J Nurs Adm ; 51(4): 192-199, 2021 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33734178

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Objectives were to evaluate patient perceptions of a nurse-led, patient-centered gratitude intervention and if nurses identified actionable items to improve patient's hospitalization experience. BACKGROUND: Research demonstrates positive effects of gratitude and caring interventions on patient health and well-being. Evidence is sparse regarding nurse-led gratitude interventions improving hospitalized patient's experiences. METHODS: In this pilot study, 91 adult medical patients completed gratitude forms twice daily for up to 6 shifts and a study discharge form documenting intervention perceptions. In response to the patients' gratitude-related feedback, RNs recorded patient experience-related actions they and interprofessional teams could implement. RESULTS: On average, patients perceived the nurse-led gratitude intervention as helpful (4.2) (1 = very unhelpful, 5 = very helpful) and improved hospitalization experiences (4.3) (1 = seldom, 5 = never). Most of the time actions were required or to be taken, based on patient gratitude intervention responses. CONCLUSIONS: Patient perceptions of nurse-led gratitude intervention demonstrated helpfulness and improved hospitalization experience.


Subject(s)
Nurse-Patient Relations , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Patient-Centered Care/methods , Spirituality , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Pilot Projects , Workplace/psychology
17.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(6): e24279, 2021 Feb 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33578524

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a common infammatory rheumatic disease that affects the axial skeleton. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) nonpharmacological interventions are gaining an increasing popularity for AS. Nevertheless, the evidence of efficacy and safety of random controlled trials (RCTs) remains controversial. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and acceptability of different TCM nonpharmacological therapies by systematic review and network meta-analysis. METHODS: According to the strategy, the authors will retrieve a total of 7 electronic databases by December 2020, including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMbase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Biological Medicine, Chongqing VIP, and Wan-fang databases After a series of screening, 2 researchers will use Aggregate Data Drug Information System and Stata software to analyze the data extracted from the randomized controlled trials of TCM nonpharmacological interventions for AS. The primary outcome will be the improvement of Pain intensity and functional status/disability and the secondary outcomes will include lobal improvement, health-related quality of life, satisfaction with treatment, and adverse events. Both classical meta-analysis and network meta-analysis will be implemented to investigate direct and indirect evidences on this topic. The quality of the evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation instrument. RESULTS: This study will provide a reliable evidence for the selection of TCM nonpharmacological therapies in the treatment of AS. CONCLUSION: This study will generate evidence for different TCM nonpharmacological therapies for AS and provide a decision-making reference for clinical research. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study does not require ethical approval. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication. OSF REGISTRATION NUMBER: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/FHD2U.


Subject(s)
Medicine, Chinese Traditional , Pain Measurement , Patient Satisfaction , Spondylitis, Ankylosing , Female , Humans , Male , China/epidemiology , Data Management , Databases, Factual , Disability Evaluation , Functional Status , Medicine, Chinese Traditional/adverse effects , Medicine, Chinese Traditional/methods , Network Meta-Analysis , Pain Measurement/statistics & numerical data , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Safety , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/pathology , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/psychology , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Systematic Reviews as Topic
18.
Nurs Outlook ; 69(2): 136-146, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33573826

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted nurses' compassionate presence during stressful conditions. Strategies to reduce workplace stress are needed. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a stress reduction strategy, an Internet-based Mantram Repetition Program (MRP), for nurses caring for hospitalized Veterans. METHODS: A one group pre-/post-test design was used to assess change in nurses' perceived outcomes after participating in the MRP. A post-test-only design was used to assess hospitalized Veterans' perceptions of nursing presence and satisfaction with care. Qualitative interviews were used to supplement quantitative data. FINDINGS: Patients perceived high levels of presence and satisfaction with care. Post MRP, nurses perceived increased mindfulness, compassion satisfaction, spiritual well-being, and nursing presence. Increased mindfulness was associated with greater compassion satisfaction and less burnout. DISCUSSION: For nurses working on the front lines of patient care, the potential for experiencing stress and burnout is a reality. Participating in a MRP could lessen these effects and facilitate nursing presence.


Subject(s)
Internet-Based Intervention , Nurse-Patient Relations , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Occupational Stress/prevention & control , Patient-Centered Care/organization & administration , Spiritual Therapies , Adult , Aged , Burnout, Professional/prevention & control , COVID-19 , Empathy , Female , Humans , Job Satisfaction , Male , Middle Aged , Mindfulness , Nursing Evaluation Research , Nursing Staff, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Qualitative Research , Veterans/psychology , Young Adult
19.
Urology ; 148: 93-99, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33358753

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether progression to maintenance percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) was related to perceived global impression of improvement (PGII) rather than symptom-specific improvement in patient with overactive bladder (OAB). We hypothesize that PGII will predict continuation of PTNS long-term. METHODS: This prospective observational study included 90 patients with OAB that initiated PTNS. The PGII and OAB short-form questionnaires (OABq-SF) were used to assess bladder symptom severity and improvement. Those that completed the 12-week induction phase were offered to continue PTNS monthly maintenance or pursue other options. The primary outcome was difference in PGII score between those pursuing maintenance therapy versus other options. Descriptive statistics and mixed effect modeling analysis were employed. RESULTS: Seventy patients (78%) completed 12 weeks of PTNS. The majority of completers pursued monthly maintenance (P< .01) and had significantly lower median PGII scores compared with those who sought alternatives (P < .01), while OABq-SF scores did not differ significantly (P = .65). Patients that pursued monthly PTNS maintenance had lower body mass index than those who chose alternative therapies (P < .01). Only 19% continued PTNS therapy for at least 1 year. CONCLUSION: More patients pursued PTNS monthly maintenance over any other therapy, and this was significantly associated with lower PGII scores. Global improvement, and not symptom-specific response, predicts long-term PTNS maintenance. No symptom-specific predictors were identified in those who pursued maintenance over other options. One-year continuation rates are low.


Subject(s)
Continuity of Patient Care , Duration of Therapy , Episode of Care , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Tibial Nerve , Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation/statistics & numerical data , Urinary Bladder, Overactive/therapy , Aged , Body Mass Index , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Symptom Assessment , Treatment Outcome
20.
Women Birth ; 34(4): e396-e405, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32800468

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The process of developing a survey instrument to evaluate women's experiences of their maternity care is complex given that maternity care encapsulates various contexts, services, professions and professionals across the antenatal, intranatal and postnatal periods. AIM: To identify and prioritise items for inclusion in the National Maternity Experience Survey, a survey instrument to evaluate women's experiences of their maternity care in the Republic of Ireland. METHODS: This study used an adapted two-phase exploratory sequential mixed methods design. Phase one identified items for possible inclusion and developed an exhaustive item pool through a systematic review, focus groups and one to one interviews, and a gap analysis. Phase two prioritised the items for inclusion in the final item bank through a Delphi study and consensus review. FINDINGS: Following iterative consultation with key stakeholder groups, a bank of 95 items have been prioritised and grouped within eight distinct care sections; care during your pregnancy, care during your labour and birth, care in hospital after the birth of your baby, specialised care for your baby, feeding your baby, care at home after the birth of your baby, overall care and you and your household. CONCLUSION: Robust and rigorous methods have been used to develop a bank of 95 suitable items for inclusion in the National Maternity Experience Survey.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Maternal Health Services/standards , Midwifery , Mothers/psychology , Parturition/psychology , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Adult , Female , Focus Groups , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Interviews as Topic , Ireland , Labor, Obstetric , Pregnancy , Qualitative Research
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL