Perineal repair performed by midwives in Australia: A cross-sectional survey study of education and practice.

PROBLEM: Perineal repair is generally not a widely practiced skill amongst Australian midwives, the reasons for this are uncertain and may result in technique variations. BACKGROUND: Many birthing women experience perineal tears that require suturing. As midwives attend the majority of vaginal births, they would be ideally placed to undertake perineal repair. AIM: To describe the current level of midwifery perineal repair skill acquisition, knowledge, techniques and utilization by Australian midwives. METHODS: An online survey was distributed to Australian College of Midwives members and shared via social media. Data on demographics, suturing techniques, reasons why midwives did or did not suture and barriers to skill acquisition were collected. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables including percentages, mean, standard deviation, median and range as appropriate. FINDINGS: 375 completed surveys were received between April and May 2023. 197 midwives indicated current suturing practice and 178 did not suture. Contributing to continuity of care was the most common motivating factor. The use of a continuous suturing technique for all layers of a perineal injury was reported by the majority of suturing midwives. There was greater variation in the management of labial tears. Low numbers of skilled midwives to support attaining competency and high workloads were the main barriers to attaining suturing skills. DISCUSSION: Australian midwives view perineal suturing as a valid midwifery skill that can contribute to continuity of care. Largely organisational barriers exist to skill development and greater utilisation. CONCLUSION: Perineal repair should be prioritised as a fundamental midwifery skill.

Hair embedding after transperineal prostate biopsy: two case reports.

BACKGROUND: Transperineal prostate biopsy is gradually becoming the standard methodology for diagnosing prostate cancer because of its high accuracy and low risk of infection, but careful preparation is not always highlighted before a transperineal biopsy. we reported two cases of hair embedding during transurethral resection of the prostate following transperineal puncture biopsy with a Bard MC1820 disposable biopsy needle. Histological examination did not find the hair follicle structure required for hair growth. The hair source was suspected to be percutaneously brought in by needle during the biopsya simulated experiment was used to analyze and reconstruct the process of hair embedding in prostate tissue. CONCLUSION: Hair embedding caused by perineal prostate biopsy is a consumable-related adverse event, and skin preparation before a transperineal prostate biopsy is recommended.

Web-based learning media the skills of suturing rupture perineum of midwifery students.

OBJECTIVE: This research aims to determine the influence of Web-based learning media on improving perineum rupture stitching skills for D-III Midwifery students. METHOD: This study uses a Research and Development (R&D) research design with the Borg & Gall development model to test the use of this product. The Quasi-Experimental research with a non-equivalent control group design was conducted in January-February 2020 at AKBID Pelamonia Makassar. The sample in this study was the second semester of the Midwifery Academy Pelamonia VII Wirabuana Makassar, totaling 64 people who were divided into two groups of intervention and control. The intervention group I (WEB media giving) amounted to 32 people and control 32 people. The sampling technique used is purposive sampling. At the end of the meeting, a post-test was conducted. The statistical test used was the paired sample t-test and Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: The percentage of application assessment using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) questionnaire to assess the application's usability level is a very good category and can be interpreted that students accept WEB-based learning media. Statistical tests showed differences in the results of measurement I and measurement II in the removal of grade II perineum rupture in the control group (p<0.05) and contributed 15.6%. In the intervention group I (WEB-based learning media), there were differences in skills before and after media giving (p<0.05) and contributed 89.8% in improving the skills of the second semester Midwifery DIII students regarding the sewing of second-degree perineum rupture. CONCLUSION: The use of Web-Based Learning Media facilitates and enhances students in performing second-degree perineum rupture sewing skills.

Care for perineal tears in vaginal delivery: An update for midwife.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study will be to review several studies regarding the repair or treatment of perineal tears after vaginal delivery. This is expected to be an update for a midwife in daily caring. METHODS: Two electronic databases (PubMed and Sciencedirect) were searched to locate relevant literature about perineal tears/wound/laceration/trauma that is published in 2016-2021. 124 Pubmed articles and 452 ScienceDirect articles filtered successfully. The articles that have been obtained will be evaluated based on the inclusion criteria in this study. We summarize place and date, objective, design, samples, the measurement used, and research results. RESULTS: 9 articles were found that matched the inclusion criteria. Three articles examined the effect of the type of suture on perineal pain, and another 6 discussed therapy to reduce the adverse effects of perineal tears. The therapies used are far-infrared radiation therapy, capacitive-resistive radiofrequency therapy, pelvic floor muscle training in early postpartum, cold therapy, and treatment with TheresienOl (natural oil). CONCLUSION: Sutures and technique/suturing second-degree perineal tears or a postpartum episiotomy can affect perineal pain. Cold gel pad therapy and treatment with natural oil on perineal wounds can affect perineal pain and wound healing.

Oncologic and Functional Outcomes of Pelvic Perineal Reconstruction by Perineal Colostomy and Malone Procedure After Abdominoperineal Resection.

BACKGROUND: Abdominoperineal resection is the standard curative surgical technique for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the lower rectum and squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal after chemoradiotherapy. However, it requires a definitive abdominal colostomy that modifies the body appearance. OBJECTIVE: The study aim was to evaluate the combination of abdominoperineal resection with perineal colostomy reconstruction and Malone antegrade continence enema. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at the Toulouse Hospital Digestive Surgery Department. PATIENTS: All of the patients with advanced adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma who underwent abdominoperineal resection with perineal colostomy reconstruction and Malone antegrade continence enema (n = 80) between December 1999 and December 2016 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome was the 5-year overall survival rate. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival was 74.89% (95% CI, 62.91%-83.50%), and the median recurrence-free survival was 107.6 months (95% CI, 65.1-198.1 mo). The median follow-up was 91.0 months (95% CI, 70.4-116.6 mo). R0 resection was obtained in 64 patients (80.0%). The median Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (to assess the functional outcomes) was 9.0 (interquartile range, 1.0-18.0), and it was lower in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma than with squamous cell carcinoma (7.0 (interquartile range, 2.0-18.0) vs 11.0 (interquartile range, 1.0-17.0); p = 0.01). Eleven patients (13.8%) reported perineal stains during the night, and 19 patients (23.8%) needed drugs to reduce colon motility. The rate of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo >II) was 11.7% (n = 9). Definitive colostomy was performed in 15 patients (18.8%). LIMITATIONS: This retrospective study included a small number of patients from a single center. Moreover, the functional outcome was tested with self-report questionnaires (risk of response bias). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that abdominoperineal resection associated with perineal reconstruction by perineal colostomy and Malone antegrade continence enema is safe and may improve patient quality of life. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B629. RESULTADOS ONCOLGICOS Y FUNCIONALES DE LA RECONSTRUCCIN PLVIPERINEAL MEDIANTE COLOSTOMA PERINEAL Y PROCEDIMIENTO DE MALONE DESPUS DE LA RESECCIN ABDOMINOPERINEAL: ANTECEDENTES:La resección abdominoperineal es la técnica quirúrgica curativa estándar para el tratamiento del adenocarcinoma localmente avanzado del recto inferior y el carcinoma a células escamosas del canal anal, después de radio-quimioterapia. Sin embargo, requiere una colostomía abdominal definitiva que modifica la apariencia corporal.OBJETIVO:El propósito del presente estudio fue el evaluar la combinación de la resección abdominoperineal con la confección de una colostomía perineal asociada a enemas de continencia anterógrada según Malone.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo.AJUSTES:Servicio de Cirugía Digestiva del Hospital de Toulouse, Francia.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron todos los pacientes con adenocarcinoma avanzado o carcinoma de células escamosas que se sometieron a resección abdominoperineal con la confección de una colostomía perineal asociada a enemas de continencia anterógrada según Malone (n = 80) entre diciembre de 1999 y diciembre de 2016.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El principal resultado fue la tasa de sobrevida global a 5 años.RESULTADOS:La sobrevida global a 5 años fue de 74,89% (IC del 95%, 62,91 a 83,50) y la mediana de supervivencia libre de recurrencia fue de 107,6 meses (IC del 95%, 65,1 a 198,1). La mediana de seguimiento fue de 91,0 meses (IC del 95%, 70,4-116,6). La resección R0 se obtuvo en 64 pacientes (80,0%). La mediana de puntuación de la escala de incontinencia de la Cleveland Clinic (para evaluar los resultados funcionales) fue de 9,0 [1,0; 18,0], y fue menor en pacientes con adenocarcinoma avanzado que con carcinoma de células escamosas (7,0 [2,0; 18,0] versus 11,0 [1,0; 17,0]; p = 0,01). Once pacientes (13,8%) refirieron manchado perineal nocurno y 19 pacientes (23,8%) necesitaron fármacos para reducir la motilidad del colon. La tasa de complicaciones graves (Clavien-Dindo > II) fue del 11,7% (n = 9). Se realizó colostomía definitiva en 15 (18,8%) pacientes.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio retrospectivo incluyó un pequeño número de pacientes y de un solo centro. Además, el resultado funcional se probó con cuestionarios de autoinforme (riesgo de sesgo de respuesta).CONCLUSIONES:Este estudio sugiere que la resección abdominoperineal asociada con la confección de una colostomía perineal asociada a enemas de continencia anterógrada según Malone es segura y puede mejorar la calidad de vida de los pacientes. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B629.

Clinical effects of different anesthesia methods in lateral episiotomy.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical effects of different anesthesia methods in lateral episiotomy. Providing the guidance of choosing the appropriate anesthesia method in clinical operation. METHODS: A total of 300 primiparas with vaginal delivery were enrolled into this study. These primiparas were divided into three groups (n=100, each), according to the different methods of anesthesia: group A (pudendal nerve block anesthesia + stepwise dissection and incisional local anesthesia), group B (bilateral pudendal nerve block anesthesia), and group C (pudendal nerve block anesthesia + local infiltration anesthesia). The pain score of these primiparas at the time of perineal dissection and suturing, as well as suturing time and bleeding volume, were observed and compared among these three groups. RESULTS: In respect of pain scores at the time of suturing in lateral episiotomy, maternal pain score was significantly lower in group A than in groups B and C; and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). In respect of the time required for suturing in lateral episiotomy, suturing time was shorter in group A than in groups B and C; and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). In respect of the bleeding volume in lateral episiotomy, maternal bleeding volume was lesser in group A than in groups B and C; and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Among these three commonly used methods of anesthesia in lateral episiotomy, the pudendal nerve block anesthesia + stepwise dissection and incisional local anesthesia method used in group A had the best analgesic effect, the shortest suturing time, and the lowest wound blood loss. KEY WORDS: Lateral episiotomy, Pudendal nerve block anesthesia, Local anesthesia, Pain score.

Combined massage and warm compress to the perineum during active second stage of labor in nulliparas: A randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the combined effect of massage and warm compress to the perineum (MassComp) compared with standard "hands-off" in the second stage of labor. METHODS: A randomized trial was conducted in a University hospital in Malaysia. Nulliparous women at term who were about to start pushing were randomized to massage during pushing and warm compress to the perineum in between pushes or to standard "hands-off" care. Primary outcome was suturing for perineal injury (episiotomy or tear). RESULTS: A total of 156 participants were analyzed based on intention to treat. Perineal repair rates were 53/79 (67%) for MassComp versus 70/77 (91%) for control (relative risk [RR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-0.98, number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome [NNTb ] 5, 95% CI 2.83-8.62, P < 0.001). Of the secondary outcomes, participants' satisfaction with care (visual numerical rating scale 0-10; 8.3 ± 1.2 vs 7.8 ± 1.2, P = 0.014), major perineal injury (second degree or higher) rates 34/79 (43%) versus 51/77 (66%) (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.58-0.97, NNTb 5, 95% CI 2.61-12.56, P = 0.004), episiotomy rates 28/79 (37%) versus 40/77 (53%) (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.52-0.98, NNTb 8, 95% CI 3.63-36.46, P = 0.043), intervention to delivery intervals 29.5 ± 13.6 versus 27.9 ± 13.8 minutes (P = 0.472) and spontaneous vaginal delivery rates 63/79 (79.7%) versus 56/77 (72.7%) (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.92-1.34, P = 0.306) for MassComp versus control, respectively. CONCLUSION: Massage and warm compress during pushing decreased the perineal suturing, major perineal injury, and episiotomy rates and improved maternal satisfaction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN42773879.

Perineorrhaphy Outcomes Related to Body Imagery: A Randomized Trial of Body Image Perception.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine if a perineorrhaphy at the time of apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery positively affects women's body image. METHODS: This is a randomized controlled trial of women undergoing apical suspension procedures in which women (GH ≥2 cm to ≤6 cm) received either perineorrhaphy or no perineorrhaphy. The primary aim compared body image between the groups postoperatively using the Body Image in Pelvic Organ Prolapse (BIPOP) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included prolapse stage, pain, pelvic floor muscle strength, pelvic floor symptoms, and sexual function. Between- and within-group differences were compared using Fisher exact test for categorical variables and t tests for continuous variables. When continuous variables were not normally distributed, the Welch-Satterthwaite test was used. Within-group analyses were performed via paired t tests for select continuous variables. RESULTS: Forty-six women were enrolled; 45 (97.8%) completed the 6-week assessment and 38 (82.6%) completed the 3-month assessment. There were no differences in baseline characteristics. Although women within groups had an expected improvement in mean Body Image in Pelvic Organ Prolapse and subscale scores between baseline and 3 months (P < 0.05), there were no differences in the mean scores between groups. In addition, there were no differences between groups in any of the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Performance of apical prolapse surgery improved women's body image, irrespective of performance of a perineorrhaphy. Other important outcomes, including pain, did not differ between women in the 2 groups. These findings demonstrate the need for further trials to investigate the utility of this procedure.

A Novel Injection Technique for Extended-Release Local Anesthetic After Posterior Colporrhaphy and Perineorrhaphy: A Randomized Controlled Study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of vaginal intraoperative infiltration of liposomal bupivacaine on vaginal pain among patients undergoing posterior colporrhaphy and perineorrhaphy. METHODS: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial offered to women undergoing posterior colporrhaphy and perineorrhaphy with concomitant pelvic reconstructive procedures. Liposomal bupivacaine or normal saline placebo (30 mL) was injected into the posterior vaginal compartment and perineal body in 2- to 3-mL increments, using a systematic technique. All participants received 10-mL 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine prior to incision. Perioperative care was standardized. The primary outcome was vaginal pain as measured by a visual analog scale. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-six women were screened, and 72 were included. Demographic characteristics were similar. Median visual analog scale was not different at any time point (P = 0.81). There were no differences in secondary outcomes, including narcotic use (37.5 vs 37.5 mg morphine equivalents, P = 0.51; placebo vs liposomal bupivacaine), time to first opioid (68 vs 89.5 minutes, P = 0.56), antiemetic doses (3 vs 2, P = 0.07), hospital length of stay (24 vs 21.9 hours, P = 0.98), length of stay in postanesthesia care unit (93 vs 100 minutes, P = 0.32), proportion of patients who had a bowel movement within the first 3 postoperative days (65.7 vs 59.5% P = 0.36), or successful voiding trials (45.7 vs 59.5%, P = 0.24). There were no differences in patient satisfaction or postoperative adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of pelvic reconstructive surgeries with posterior colporrhaphy and perineorrhaphy, there were no differences in pain scores or any secondary outcomes between liposomal bupivacaine and placebo injected into the posterior vaginal compartment.

Sectoral cancer detection and tolerability of freehand transperineal prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the feasibility of a freehand transperineal (TP) systematic prostate biopsy protocol under local anaesthesia (LA) and the value of different sectors in diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: A total of 611 consecutive freehand TP biopsies under LA in 2 hospitals were prospectively evaluated. Cancer detection rate in each of the four different sectors (anterior, mid, posterior, basal) was recorded to evaluate the value of each sector. Procedure tolerability was assessed by pain score and complications were documented. RESULTS: Systematic biopsies were performed in 556 out of 611 men with a median of 20 (IQR 12-24) biopsy cores taken. The median PSA was 9.9 (Inter-quartile range[IQR] 6.4-16.2) ng/mL, and 89.0% were first biopsies. All PCa and ISUP grade group (GG) ≥ 2 PCa (HGPCa) were diagnosed in 41.4% (230/556) and 28.2% (157/556) biopsies respectively. 77.0% HGPCa was diagnosed in ≥2 sectors. Single-sector HGPCa was predominantly found in anterior or posterior sector. Omitting base sector would have missed 1.5% (1/65) HGPCa out of the 219 cases with ≥24-core biopsies performed. Further omission of mid sector would have missed 3.1% (2/65) HGPCa and 7.4% (7/94) ISUP GG1 PCa (in which 3/7 involved 2 sectors). LA TP biopsy was well tolerated and the mean pain scores of the different steps of the procedure were between 1.9-3.1 (out of 10). Post-biopsy fever occurred in 0.3% of patients (2/611) and no sepsis was reported. The risk of urinary retention in men with ≥20 cores in ≥60 ml prostate was 7.8% (14/179), compared with 1.7% (7/423) in other groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TP sectoral prostate biopsy under LA was well tolerated with minimal sepsis risk. Basal sector biopsies had minimal additional value to HGPCa detection and its omission can be considered.

Pain in Men Undergoing Transperineal Free-Hand Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Targeted Biopsies under Local Anesthesia: Outcomes and Predictors from a Multicenter Study of 1,008 Patients.

PURPOSE: Several transperineal biopsy series have proven feasibility under local anesthesia. However, there is a lack of large analyses detailing pain outcomes and factors influencing pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2016 to 2019 we performed a multicenter prospective study in men undergoing multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transperineal fusion biopsies (target+systematic cores) under local anesthesia. Primary outcomes were 1) pain scores (assessed through a 0 to 10-point numeric rating scale) and 2) identification of factors associated with severe pain. The secondary outcome was to evaluate pain influence on clinically significant prostate cancer target cores detection. RESULTS: We included 1,008 men undergoing transperineal fusion biopsies under local anesthesia. Mean±SD numeric rating scale pain scores were 3.9±2.1 at local anesthesia administration and 3.1±2.3 when performing biopsies. Pain was not associated with lower clinically significant prostate cancer detection on targeted cores (p=0.23 and p=0.47 depending on clinically significant prostate cancer definition). On multivariate analysis age (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.99) and severe anxiety (OR 2.99, 95% CI 1.83-4.89) were a protective and risk factor, respectively, for severe biopsy pain. Procedural time was also associated with an increased risk of experiencing severe biopsy pain (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00-1.08). If aiming to test the possible effects of anxiety preventive measures on pain, an anxiety cutoff greater than 6 on a numeric rating scale would decrease to 13% the number of patients being treated while identifying 56% of those experiencing severe pain. CONCLUSIONS: Transperineal fusion biopsies under local anesthesia result in moderate pain. Pain does not influence clinically significant prostate cancer target detection. Patient anxiety predicts pain. A numeric rating scale based anxiety assessment may be used to identify those at higher risk for experiencing severe pain in men undergoing transperineal fusion biopsies.

Impact of a selective use of episiotomy combined with Couder's maneuver for the perineal protection.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of a selective use of episiotomy combined with Couder's maneuver on the incidence of perineal tears in spontaneous term deliveries. METHODS: A comparative, retrospective, mono-centric study in a university maternity unit was designed and included all primiparous women who delivered spontaneously after 37 weeks of gestation in cephalic presentation. Two cohorts were studied, before and after the practice of Couder's maneuver. In the first cohort, the ''OSE cohort'' only selective episiotomies were performed from January 2009 to December 2010. In the second cohort, from January 2016 to December 2017, the ''SEC cohort'' selective episiotomies combined with Couder's maneuver were performed by midwives and obstetricians. The primary outcome was the type of perineal tears, according to the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) classification. RESULTS: A total of 2081 patients were included: 909 patients in the OSE cohort and 1172 patients in the SEC cohort. Couder's maneuver was performed in 59% of the SEC cohort. In the SEC cohort, there were an increase in the number of intact perinea (55% versus 63%, p < 0.001), a decrease in second-degree perineal tears (18% versus 11%, p < 0.001) and a decrease in labia minora tears (48% versus 37%, p < 0.001). The rate of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries was less than 1% in both cohorts (0.3% versus 0.5%, p = 0.7). CONCLUSION: A selective use of episiotomy combined with Couder's maneuver could reduce the incidence of perineal tears, particularly second-degree perineal tears, without increasing the rate of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries.

Feasibility of freehand MRI/US cognitive fusion transperineal biopsy of the prostate in local anaesthesia as in-office procedure-experience with 400 patients.

BACKGROUND: Transrectal (TR) ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy is one of the most commonly performed urologic procedures worldwide. The major drawback of this approach is the associated risk for infectious complications. Sepsis rates are increasing due to rising antibiotic resistance, representing a global issue. The transperineal (TP) approach for prostate biopsy has recently been adopted at many centres as an alternative to the TR biopsy, and it was shown to be associated with a lower risk for sepsis. The aim of this study was to assess safety and tolerability of TP prostate biopsy performed in local anaesthesia. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data of patients who had undergone office-based TP prostate biopsy in local anaesthesia, performed by a single surgeon between January 2015 and May 2019. We evaluated the patients' acceptance of the procedure by a pain score, as well as its safety and diagnostic performance. RESULTS: Four hundred patients were included. Median age was 66 years [range, 49-86]. Median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration was 6.4 ng/ml [range, 0.3-1400], median PSA density was 0.15 ng/ml2 [range, 0-31.1] and median prostate volume was 40 ml [range, 6-150]. A total of 118 (29.5%) and 105 (26.2%) patients had orally received two and one doses of 500 mg fluoroquinolone, respectively, and 177 (44.3%) patients did not receive any antibiotic prophylaxis. No infectious complications occurred. Median pain score was 2.0 (range, 0-8). Overall cancer detection rate was 64.5% (258/400). CONCLUSIONS: Freehand TP prostate biopsy in local anaesthesia is a safe, effective and well-tolerated outpatient procedure with a high cancer detection rate. The elimination of infectious complications and its high accuracy make this technique a feasible alternative to the TR approach for the urological office. We assume that the single puncture and our trocar-like access sheath introduction technique diminish tissue trauma and bacterial exposition, and thus contribute to these promising results.

Perineal suture practices. Are they up to date with the evidence based medicine data: A local experience into a university maternity?

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prevalence of perineal suture techniques then to identify the factors influencing suturing technique choices. METHODS: Prospective, observational, monocentric study over 20 weeks in a university hospital. A personal questionnaire was completed by medical practitioners performing perineal sutures: years of experience, training attendance, suturing techniques usually used for degrees 1 and 2 tears/episiotomies. For each delivery with perineal tear/episiotomy, the professional answered on the type of suture performed and the reasons for choosing this technique. We distinguished discontinuous sutures (several stitches/continuous locking stitch) from continuous sutures (single thread, single continuous locking stitch). We evaluated the prevalence of the techniques used in our center as well as the factors associated with the choice of technique, then we described the characteristics of the professionals who responded to the survey and their suturing habits. RESULTS: Among the 401 perineal sutures, 45.4% of them were continuous (n = 182), discontinuous sutures were more performed. Discontinuous sutures were more common in 1st and 2nd degree tears. Residents/obstetricians performed significantly more continuous sutures than midwives. Whatever the type of suture technique used (continuous or discontinuous), professionals sutured in the way they felt most suitable to the degree of tearing/episiotomy. Fifty-one percent of midwives are trained in continuous technique, compared with 81% of residents/obstetricians. Midwives required training in 70% of cases and 64% of residents. CONCLUSIONS: It appears necessary to disseminate continuous suture techniques and to promote their training in order to improve our practices.

Lidocaine-prilocaine cream versus local infiltration anesthesia in pain relief during repair of perineal trauma after vaginal delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Perineal trauma is a common problem that may affect women during vaginal delivery; this trauma can be either spontaneous (tear) or intentional (episiotomy). When repair of perineal trauma is required, adequate analgesics must be obtained. Topical products as lidocaine-prilocaine (EMLA) cream is one of the suggested methods, but still there is lack of evidence with regard to its efficacy and safety.Objective: The aim of this review is to assess the evidence of utilizing EMLA cream in comparison to local perineal infiltration anesthesia for pain control during perineal repair after vaginal delivery.Data sources: Medline, Embase, Dynamed Plus, ScienceDirect, TRIP database, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Library were searched electronically from January 2006 to May 2018 for studies investigating the effect of lidocaine-prilocaine cream in relieving pain during repair of perineal trauma.Methods of study selection: All randomized controlled trials assessing effect of lidocaine-prilocaine cream versus local infiltration anesthesia in relieving pain during repair of perineal trauma were considered for this meta-analysis. Fifteen studies were identified of which four studies deemed eligible for this review. Quality and risk of bias assessment was performed for all studies.Data extraction: Two researchers independently extracted the data from the individual articles and entered into RevMan software. The weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. Statistical heterogeneity between studies was assessed by the Higgins chi-square and (I2) statistics. When heterogeneity was significant, a random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. Otherwise, the fixed effect meta-analysis was used when there was no significant heterogeneity.Results: Pooled analysis of result in "pain score" was insignificant between the two groups (WMD -1.11; 95% CI (-2.55 to 0.33); p = .13). Furthermore, the use of additional analgesia showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (WMD 1.34; 95% CI (0.66-2.71), p = .42). Regarding patient satisfaction, an overall analysis of three studies showed significant results favoring EMLA cream group users (WMD 4.65; 95% CI (1.96-11.03), p = .0005). The pooled analysis of the outcome "duration of repair" showed the significantly shorter duration of repair in EMLA cream users (n = 92) than local infiltration anesthesia (n = 95) (1.72 min; 95% CI (-2.76 to -0.67), p = .001).Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that topical lidocaine-prilocaine cream gives comparable results in reducing pain during perineal repair after vaginal delivery.

The new etiology and surgical therapy of stress urinary incontinence in women.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the subjective and objective cure rate of a urethral stabilization procedure (USP) for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women; to describe this new surgical intervention; to record its potential complications; to establish the SUI etiology. STUDY DESIGN: The author conducted a prospective case series study in ambulatory settings and under local anesthesia. Thirty-four consecutive women with uncomplicated SUI subjected to USP, which was performed by reconstructing site-specific defects within the urethral stabilizing mechanism (USM) and using no surgical slings, meshes or absorbable sutures. The paravaginal defect(s) was repaired by transvaginal approach. The endopelvic fascia was sharply separated from the ventral perineal membrane (VPM) just above the anterior urethral meatus. The vestibular bulbs sharply dissected from VPM and advance upwards. The VPM defect(s) reconstructed and vestibular bulbs placed back to the original location. The access to the peri- and the para-urethral region was created by making a lateral vertical incision, aside from the lateral urethral meatus and defects were repaired. The suburethral transverse incision was made beneath the urethral meatus and the stratum-by-stratum surgical dissection conducted until the lateral vaginourethral ligament is visualized bilaterally. The defect(s) within the vaginourethral ligaments was surgically reconstructed, and the vaginal wall repaired. The primary outcome measured subjective and objective cure rates, and the secondary outcome measured the occurrence of potential complications. The five-year postoperative follow-up was conducted. RESULTS: Two out of thirty-four patients dropped-out from the study. The USP performed without difficulties, and no severe complication observed. One-subject developed superficial wound separation (3.1 %) and one-subject (3.1 %) developed urinary urge incontinence at the 5-postoperative-year. At 60-month follow-up subjective and objective cure rates were a 92 % and an 88 % respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The urethral stabilization procedure yields a high degree of subjective and objective cure rates without severe complications and is a well-tolerated operation by women. The urethral stabilization procedure is a simple, easy to implement, and reproducible method for uncomplicated stress urinary incontinence in women. Site-specific defects within the urethral stabilizing mechanism constitute the etiology of the stress urinary incontinence in women.

Perineal outcomes and its associated variables of water births versus non-water births: a cross-sectional study / Desfechos perineais e as variáveis associadas no parto na água e no parto fora da água: estudo transversal

Abstract Objectives: to describe the perineal outcomes of women who had delivered in water and out of water. Methods: a cross-sectional and quantitative study developed in a public hospital in Setúbal, Portugal. The population was of women who participated in the "Water Birth Project" in the period from 2011 to 2014, which gave birth in water and out of water. 104 women were selected according to established inclusion criteria. The groups were compared according to the following variables: demographics, obstetric information, delivery care and perineal outcomes. The data were analyzed in the Stata(r) software, with descriptive and bivariate statistics (chi-square and Fisher's test). Results: the medical records of 73 women who gave birth in water and 31 women who gave birth out of water were studied. Water deliveries were significantly associated with fewer perineal lacerations, lower rates of episiotomy, and shorter delivery time. Conclusions: the results of the study suggest that childbirth in water has a protective effect against severe third or fourth degree perineal tears, during fetal expulsion in water.

Resumo Objetivos: descrever os resultados perineais de mulheres que tiveram parto na água e fora da água. Métodos: estudo transversal e quantitativo desenvolvido em um hospital público de Setúbal, Portugal. A população foi de mulheres que participaram do "Projeto Parto na Água", no período de 2011 a 2014, que deram à luz na água e fora da água. Foram selecionadas para o estudo 104 mulheres de acordo com os critérios de inclusão estabelecidos. Os grupos foram comparados de acordo com as seguintes variáveis: demografia, informação obstétrica, assistência ao parto e resultados perineais. Os dados foram analisados no software Stata(r), com estatísitica descritiva e bivariada (qui-quadrado e teste de Fisher). Resultados: foram estudados os prontuários de 73 mulheres que deram à luz na água e 31 mulheres que deram à luz fora da água. Os partos na água foram significativamente associados a menos lacerações perineais, menores taxas de episiotomia e menor tempo de parto. Conclusão: os resultados do estudo sugerem que o parto na água tem um efeito protetor contra lacerações perineais severas de terceiro ou de quarto grau durante a expulsão fetal na água.

Laparoscopic sphincter reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection: feasibility and technical aspects.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal colostomy has been reported as an option with good quality of life for patients requiring abdominoperineal resection (APR) for very low rectal cancer. Some young, compliant patients, nevertheless, are very motivated to avoid abdominal colostomy following APR. Spiral smooth muscle cuff perineal colostomy as neosphincter reconstruction can be a reasonable alternative. We have published before the results of a series of sphincter reconstruction in the conventional technique following APR. As we developed our technique for colorectal resection sphincter reconstruction, we also changed to a laparoscopic approach. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic neosphincteric reconstruction and outline the aspects of the technique. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted on 15 patients treated at our institution during a 6 year period for low rectal cancer by laparoscopic APR and spiral smooth muscle cuff perineal colostomy as sphincter reconstruction. At follow-up at a median time of 3.7 years (range 3-9 years) after surgery, patients underwent functional evaluation which included the modified Holschneider continence score (0-16), assessing consistency of stool, frequency, impulse, discrimination, warning period, incontinence for formed or fluid feces, soiling, wearing pads, drugs, enema where a score of 13-16 is associated with normal continence, as well as neosphincter manometry. RESULTS: Laparoscopic sphincter reconstruction was feasible in all 15 patients. Two of the fifteen patients (13%) required secondary colostomy in the long term due to neosphincter malfunction and neosphincter perforation after enema. Four of the remaining thirteen patients (30%) were partially continent according to the Holschneider continence score (HCS) with a score of 7-12. The other 9 (70%) were continent (HCS: 13-16). Neosphincter manometry showed a median resting pressure of 33 cm H2O (range 30-41 cm H2O) and a median squeeze pressure of 95 cm H2O (range 84-150 cm H2O). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic sphincter reconstruction following APR is a feasible option offering an alternative to abdominal colostomy for selected patients.