Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 77
Filter
Add more filters

Complementary Medicines
Publication year range
2.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 62(3): 439-449, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34330647

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the external applicability of the COMPASS and the VOYAGER-PAD trials in patients with lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) in the real world. METHODS: This was a multicentre retrospective analysis of prospectively collected COPART data, a French multicentre registry of patients hospitalised for symptomatic LEAD. The proportion of patients eligible for the combination of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily plus aspirin based on either COMPASS or VOYAGER-PAD criteria is reported. The one year cumulative incidence of outcomes between eligible and non-eligible patients, as well as eligible patients vs. control arms of the COMPASS (LEAD patient subgroup) and the VOYAGER-PAD trials were compared. Analyses were performed using Cox models. RESULTS: Of 2 259 evaluable patients, only 679 (30.1%) were eligible for a low dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin regimen. Others were not eligible because of the need for anticoagulant (48.5% and 38.9% of patients meeting COMPASS and VOYAGER-PAD exclusion criteria, respectively) or dual antiplatelet therapy use (15.7% and 16.5%, respectively), high bleeding risk (14.4% and 11.6%, respectively), malignancy (26.1% and 21.0%, respectively), history of ischaemic/haemorrhagic stroke (21.1% and 19.8%, respectively), and severe renal failure (13.2% and 10.5%, respectively). COMPASS and VOYAGER-PAD eligible and ineligible patients were at higher risk of ischaemic events than participants in these trials. The one year cumulative incidences were 6.0% (95% CI 4.3 - 8.1) in the COMPASS eligible subset vs. 3.5% (95% CI 2.9 - 4.3) in the COMPASS control arm for major adverse cardiovascular events, and 27.9% (95% CI 19.9 - 38.3) in the VOYAGER-PAD eligible subset vs. 6.0% (95% CI 5.3 - 6.9) in the VOYAGER-PAD control arm for major adverse limb events. CONCLUSION: Many patients hospitalised for symptomatic LEAD in France are not eligible for the low dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin combination. In turn, those eligible may potentially have greater absolute benefit because of higher risk than those enrolled in the trials.


Subject(s)
Aspirin/therapeutic use , Factor Xa Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Ischemia/prevention & control , Lower Extremity/blood supply , Peripheral Arterial Disease/drug therapy , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Rivaroxaban/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , France , Hospitalization , Humans , Incidence , Ischemia/epidemiology , Ischemia/etiology , Lower Extremity/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
3.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol ; 321(2): R162-R173, 2021 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34161745

ABSTRACT

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is characterized by the accumulation of atherosclerotic plaques in the lower extremity conduit arteries, which impairs blood flow and walking capacity. Dietary nitrate has been used to reduce blood pressure (BP) and improve walking capacity in PAD. However, a standardized dose for PAD has not been determined. Therefore, we sought to determine the effects of a body mass-normalized moderate dose of nitrate (0.11 mmol nitrate/kg) as beetroot juice on serum nitrate/nitrite, vascular function, walking capacity, and tissue oxygen utilization capacity in patients with PAD. A total of 11 patients with PAD received either nitrate supplement or placebo in a randomized crossover design. Total serum nitrate/nitrite, resting BP, brachial and popliteal artery endothelial function (flow-mediated dilation, FMD), arterial stiffness (pulse-wave velocity, PWV), augmentation index (AIx), maximal walking distance and time, claudication onset time, and skeletal muscle oxygen utilization were measured pre- and postnitrate and placebo intake. There were significant group × time interactions (P < 0.05) for serum nitrate/nitrite, FMD, BP, walking distance and time, and skeletal muscle oxygen utilization. The nitrate group showed significantly increased serum nitrate/nitrite (Δ1.32 µM), increased brachial and popliteal FMD (Δ1.3% and Δ1.7%, respectively), reduced peripheral and central systolic BP (Δ-4.7 mmHg and Δ-8.2 mmHg, respectively), increased maximal walking distance (Δ92.7 m) and time (Δ56.3 s), and reduced deoxygenated hemoglobin during walking. There were no changes in PWV, AIx, or claudication (P > 0.05). These results indicate that a body-mass normalized moderate dose of nitrate may be effective and safe for reducing BP, improving endothelial function, and improving walking capacity in patients with PAD.


Subject(s)
Beta vulgaris , Endothelium, Vascular/physiopathology , Exercise Tolerance , Fruit and Vegetable Juices , Intermittent Claudication/diet therapy , Nitrates/administration & dosage , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diet therapy , Walking , Aged , Blood Pressure , Body Mass Index , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Intermittent Claudication/diagnosis , Intermittent Claudication/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Nebraska , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Recovery of Function , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Stiffness , Vasodilation
4.
J Diabetes Res ; 2021: 5122494, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34056006

ABSTRACT

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the major public health problems that account for morbidity, mortality, and disability worldwide. The presence of DM increases the risk of peripheral artery disease (PAD), as well as accelerates its course, making these patients more susceptible to ischemic events and impaired functional status. Unfortunately, alternative treatments for vascular complications in diabetes are poorly researched. Physiotherapy (kinesitherapy combined with different physical therapy agents) in individuals with DM and coexisting PAD may offer an important complementary therapy alternative. Early therapeutic measures can significantly improve patient outcomes, reduce cardiovascular risk, and improve daily life quality. The article provides an update on the current state of knowledge on physiotherapy interventions in the course of DM in patients with coexisting PAD.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Exercise Therapy , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Functional Status , Humans , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis , Peripheral Arterial Disease/epidemiology , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Quality of Life , Recovery of Function , Treatment Outcome
5.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 55(4): 367-373, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33550918

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) represents the most severe form of peripheral artery disease (PAD). Up to a third of CLTI patients are not eligible to receive first-line treatments such as bypass surgery or endovascular interventions. Epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used as a method to improve microcirculatory blood flow and relieve ischemic pain in CTLI patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate limb salvage, ulcer closure, and clinical changes of SCS implanted CTLI patients at 1-year follow-up. METHODS: Eligible patients had end-stage lower limb PAD unresponsive to medical therapy and not amenable to surgical reconstruction. Patients were candidates for amputation, but limb loss was not inevitable (Fontaine stage III and IV). Pain intensity and skin temperature in the ischemic area (visual analogue scale), quality of life (WHOQoL-BREF), and ankle/brachial blood pressure index (ABI) were recorded at routine follow-up visits. Data were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: 29 patients underwent SCS implantation at one vascular center. The minimum follow-up period was 30 months. Limb survival at 1-year follow-up was 97% (28/29) and 73% (11/15) had complete closure of limb ulcers. Pain intensity, skin temperature, and quality of life progressively improved up to 12 months after implant, with Fontaine stage III patients improving more substantially than Fontaine stage IV patients. SCS therapy did not affect ABI measurement. No complications related to the device or procedure occurred. CONCLUSIONS: SCS is a valid alternative in patients unsuitable for revascularization. The quality of results depends on both a strict selection of patients by vascular specialists and the frequency of follow-up controls. The therapy may be more beneficial in patients classified as Fontaine stage III.


Subject(s)
Ischemia/therapy , Limb Salvage , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Spinal Cord Stimulation , Aged , Chronic Disease , Female , Functional Status , Humans , Ischemia/diagnostic imaging , Ischemia/physiopathology , Limb Salvage/adverse effects , Male , Microcirculation , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnostic imaging , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Quality of Life , Recovery of Function , Regional Blood Flow , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Cord Stimulation/adverse effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Wound Healing
6.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 74: 519.e7-519.e16, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33549777

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The sympathetic nervous system (SNS) is important in the regulation of perfusion. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) modulates sympathetic tone and is approved to treat complex regional pain syndrome, a disorder related to SNS dysfunction. We herein present 3 cases of DRG-S therapy to improve blood flow and symptoms of ischemia in peripheral arterial disease (PAD). METHODS: Patient 1 is a 44-year-old female with dry gangrene of the third and fourth digits of her right hand due to Raynaud's syndrome who was scheduled for amputation of the affected digits. DRG-S leads were placed at the right C6, 7, and 8 DRG. Pulse volume recordings (PVR) were measured at baseline and after DRG-S. Patient 2 is a 55-year-old female with a non-healing ulcer of her left foot secondary to PAD scheduled for a below the knee amputation who underwent a DRG-S trial with leads placed at the left L4 and L5 DRG followed by a spinal cord stimulation trial with leads placed at the T9-T10 spinal levels for comparison. Transcutaneous oximetry (TcPO2) was measured at baseline and after 3 days of each therapy. Patient 3 is a 69-year-old female with persistent left foot pain at rest secondary to PAD with DRG-S leads placed at the left L4 and S1 levels. RESULTS: All 3 patients experienced a significant reduction in pain with DRG-S, along with improvements in blood flow of the involved extremities, avoiding or limiting amputation. PVR improved dramatically with DRG-S in patient 1. A greater improvement in TcPO2 was seen with the DRG-S trial compared to spinal cord stimulation trial in patient 2. Patient 3 experienced an increase in walking distance and demonstrated long term efficacy and limb salvage at 32 months postimplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Modulation of SNS output from DRG-S through orthodromic and antidromic autonomic pathways is likely responsible for improving blood flow. DRG-S may be a treatment option for PAD.


Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy , Ganglia, Spinal , Hemodynamics , Ischemia/therapy , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Adult , Aged , Amputation, Surgical , Female , Humans , Ischemia/diagnosis , Ischemia/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Recovery of Function , Regional Blood Flow , Treatment Outcome
7.
JAMA Cardiol ; 6(1): 21-29, 2021 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32997098

ABSTRACT

Importance: Patients with symptomatic lower extremity peripheral artery disease (LE-PAD) experience an increased risk of major vascular events. There is limited information on what clinical features of symptomatic LE-PAD prognosticate major vascular events and whether patients at high risk have a greater absolute benefit from low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin. Objective: To quantify the risk of major vascular events and investigate the response to treatment with low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin among patients with symptomatic LE-PAD based on clinical presentation and comorbidities. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a subanalysis of a previously reported subgroup of patients with symptomatic LE-PAD who were enrolled in a large, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies [COMPASS]) in 602 centers in 33 countries from March 2013 to January 2020. Data analysis was completed from May 2016 to June 2020. Interventions: A combination of low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin compared with aspirin alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: Thirty-month incidence risk of myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death (MACE), major adverse limb events (MALE) including major vascular amputation, and bleeding. Results: The COMPASS trial enrolled 4129 patients with symptomatic LE-PAD (mean [SD] age, 66.8 [8.8] years; 2932 men [71.0%]). The 30-month Kaplan-Meier incidence risk of MACE or MALE, including major amputation, was 22.6% in those with prior amputation (this outcome was observed in 54 patients), 17.6% (n = 15) in those with Fontaine III or IV symptoms, and 11.8% (n = 142) in those with previous peripheral artery revascularization, classifying these features as high-risk limb presentations. The 30-month incidence risk of MACE or MALE, including major amputation, was 14.1% (n = 118) in those with kidney dysfunction, 13.5% (n = 67) in those with heart failure, 13.4% (n = 199) in those with diabetes, and 12.8% (n = 222) in those with polyvascular disease, classifying these features as high-risk comorbidities. Among patients with either high-risk limb presentations or high-risk comorbidities, treatment with rivaroxaban and aspirin compared with aspirin alone was associated with an estimated 4.2% (95% CI, 1.9%-6.2%) absolute risk reduction for MACE or MALE, including major amputation, at 30 months. Although the estimated absolute risk increase of major bleeding was higher with rivaroxaban and aspirin in combination than aspirin alone (2.0% [95% CI, 0.5%-3.9%]) for patients with either high-risk limb presentation or high-risk comorbidity, the estimated absolute risk increase of fatal or critical organ bleeding was low in this high-risk group (0.4% [95% CI, 0.2%-1.8%]), such that the net clinical benefit was estimated to be 3.2% (95% CI, 0.6%-5.3%). Conclusions and Relevance: Patients with LE-PAD with high-risk limb presentations or high-risk comorbidities had a high incidence of major vascular events. For these patients, treatment with rivaroxaban and aspirin in combination compared with aspirin alone led to a large absolute reduction in vascular risk.


Subject(s)
Aspirin/therapeutic use , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Factor Xa Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Peripheral Arterial Disease/drug therapy , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Rivaroxaban/therapeutic use , Stroke/epidemiology , Aged , Amputation, Surgical/statistics & numerical data , Comorbidity , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Double-Blind Method , Female , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/epidemiology , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Prognosis , Renal Insufficiency/epidemiology , Severity of Illness Index
8.
J Vasc Surg ; 73(3): 903-910, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32707383

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Primary endovascular approaches are now the dominant modality for the treatment of iliac occlusive disease. However, stenting of the external iliac artery is plagued with high in-stent restenosis rates. This hybrid approach with fluoroscopic, retrograde iliofemoral endarterectomy combined with stenting was previously demonstrated to be both a safe and effective alternative to bypass and primary stenting alone for TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) II C and D lesions. In this study, early outcomes and hemodynamic improvements of this hybrid approach are evaluated with an expanded patient population. METHODS: This was a single-institution, retrospective review of all hybrid-based retrograde iliofemoral endarterectomies from the common femoral artery extending to the proximal external iliac artery from January 1, 2010, to November 15, 2017. Data were collected from the electronic medical record and analyzed using standard quantitative statistical techniques. All preprocedure and postprocedure imaging was independently reviewed by two vascular surgeons. Variables included patient demographics, degree of ischemia, and stent characteristics. The primary outcomes were mortality and freedom from amputation, with secondary outcomes including changes in the ankle-brachial index and toe pressure. RESULTS: The procedure was performed on 63 limbs in 51 total patients. In 33 limbs, the indication was critical limb ischemia (tissue loss/gangrene = 17, rest pain = 16) and 30 for lifestyle-limiting claudication. The cohort consisted of 84% TASC D and 16% TASC C. External iliac stenting was required in 68% (modal diameter, 10 mm) and ipsilateral common iliac stenting was completed in 75% (modal diameter, 9 mm). The ankle-brachial index significantly improved from 0.42 ± 0.25 to 0.73 ± 0.27 (P < .001) as did toe pressure from 29 ± 27 mm Hg to 59 ± 34 mm Hg (P < .001). Thirteen limbs ultimately required an infrainguinal procedure. One patient experienced an intraoperative iliac perforation that resolved with stenting. One death occurred within 90 days. Ninety-five percent of patients remained free from amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Extensive hybrid-based, retrograde iliofemoral endarterectomy with stenting is a safe and efficacious approach to severe iliac arterial occlusive disease, with excellent early outcomes. This series promulgates the hypothesis that extensive endarterectomy with selective iliac stenting yields superior results to external iliac stenting alone. Given the superb hemodynamic improvements in a larger patient population, this hybrid-based, extensive iliofemoral endarterectomy should be recommended as a minimally invasive, first-line treatment for severe iliac occlusive disease.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon , Endarterectomy , Iliac Artery/surgery , Peripheral Arterial Disease/surgery , Aged , Amputation, Surgical , Angioplasty, Balloon/adverse effects , Angioplasty, Balloon/instrumentation , Endarterectomy/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Iliac Artery/diagnostic imaging , Iliac Artery/physiopathology , Limb Salvage , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Stents , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Patency
9.
J Ethnopharmacol ; 264: 113235, 2021 Jan 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32777518

ABSTRACT

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: DG is a herbal formula, containing the root of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge (Danshen) and the root of Pueraria lobate (Willd.) Ohwi (Gegen), has a history of usage in China for cardiovascular protection and anti-atherosclerosis. AIM OF THE STUDY: The present study aims to determine the beneficial effect of DG on the hind-limb ischemia rat model which mimics peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and its vasodilative effect on isolated femoral artery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The vasodilatory effects were assessed by contractile responses to DG in the isolated femoral artery and its underlying mechanisms were evaluated by the involvement of endothelium, potassium channel and calcium channel. For hind-limb ischemia study, treatment outcomes were assessed by evaluating hind-limb blood flow, functional limb recovery, muscle histology and angiogenesis. RESULTS: Our results demonstrated positive dose-dependent vasodilatory response to DG via an endothelium-independent mechanism that involved inwardly rectifying K+ channels and Ca2+ channels. We also demonstrated significant improvement in blood perfusion and micro-vessel density in the ischemic limb and positive effects in functional limb recovery. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our study supported the potential use of DG as a novel treatment for symptomatic PAD.


Subject(s)
Gait/drug effects , Peripheral Arterial Disease/drug therapy , Plant Extracts/therapeutic use , Pueraria , Salvia miltiorrhiza , Vasodilation/drug effects , Animals , Blood Flow Velocity/drug effects , Blood Flow Velocity/physiology , Disease Models, Animal , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Gait/physiology , Hindlimb/blood supply , Hindlimb/drug effects , Male , Organ Culture Techniques , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Plant Extracts/isolation & purification , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Vasodilation/physiology
10.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(50): e23366, 2020 Dec 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33327260

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Far-infrared irradiation (FIR) is used in the medical field to improve wound healing, hemodialysis with peripheral artery occlusive disease, and osteoarthritis but seldom used in ameliorating poor lower extremity circulation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of FIR on changes in foot skin surface temperature (FSST) and autonomic nerve system (ANS) activity to evaluate its effectiveness in improving lower limb circulation. METHODS: A randomized controlled study was conducted. Subjects (n = 44), all over the age of 50 years and satisfying the inclusion criteria, were randomly allocated into 2 groups. The intervention group received FIR on a lower limb for 40 minutes and the control group received no intervention. Left big toe (LBT), right big toe (RBT), left foot dorsal (LFD), right foot dorsal (RFD) surface skin temperature, autonomic nervous activity, and blood pressure were assessed. RESULTS: The main results were skin surface temperature at the LBT increased from 30.8 ±â€Š0.4°C to 34.8 ±â€Š0.4°C, at RBT increased from 29.6 ±â€Š0.4°C to 35.3 ±â€Š0.4°C and LFD increased from 31.9 ±â€Š0.3°C to 36.4 ±â€Š0.4°C, RFD increased from 30.7 ±â€Š0.3°C to 37.7 ±â€Š0.2°C. FIR caused a significant increase of the FSST ranging in a 4°C to 7°C increase after 40 minutes irradiation (P < .001). The ANS low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) activity showed a statistically significant increase in the FIR group (P < .05) but not the LF/HF ratio. CONCLUSION: FIR significantly increased the FSST from between 4°C and 7°C after 40 minutes irradiation, which might improve lower extremity circulation and regulation of ANS activity.


Subject(s)
Heart Rate/radiation effects , Phototherapy/methods , Skin Temperature/radiation effects , Aged , Autonomic Nervous System/radiation effects , Female , Foot/blood supply , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Infrared Rays , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy
11.
Undersea Hyperb Med ; 47(3): 491-530, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32931678

ABSTRACT

The use of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) for the treatment of selected problem wounds has focused almost entirely on the diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) in recent years. The prevalence of DFUs in today's patient population and the reimbursement available for the treatment of DFUs have given it priority status in discussions about problem wounds, but there are sound fundamental reasons why additional oxygen may have benefits in the treatment of non-DFU wounds.


Subject(s)
Hyperbaric Oxygenation/methods , Oxygen/physiology , Skin Ulcer/therapy , Wound Healing/physiology , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Anemia, Sickle Cell/complications , Calciphylaxis/therapy , Diabetic Foot/physiopathology , Diabetic Foot/therapy , Graft vs Host Disease/therapy , Humans , Limb Salvage , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Partial Pressure , Patient Selection , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pyoderma Gangrenosum/physiopathology , Pyoderma Gangrenosum/therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Raynaud Disease/physiopathology , Raynaud Disease/therapy , Scleroderma, Systemic/physiopathology , Scleroderma, Systemic/therapy , Skin Ulcer/etiology , Skin Ulcer/physiopathology , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Treatment Outcome , Utilization Review , Wounds and Injuries/complications
12.
Cleve Clin J Med ; 87(5 suppl 1): 21-25, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32349971

ABSTRACT

The stenosis or occlusion of extremities defining peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a risk factor for adverse cardiovascular events and adverse limb events including amputation. PAD is common, can occur without symptoms or with claudication, and is easily diagnosed. Proper diagnosis and adherence to guideline-directed therapy can reduce the morbidity and potential mortality associated with PAD.


Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy , Factor Xa Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Intermittent Claudication/drug therapy , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Thrombosis/prevention & control , Vascular Surgical Procedures , Vasodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Ankle Brachial Index , Anticholesteremic Agents/therapeutic use , Cilostazol/therapeutic use , Diet, Healthy , Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy , Endovascular Procedures , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Intermittent Claudication/etiology , Peripheral Arterial Disease/complications , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Rivaroxaban/therapeutic use , Smoking Cessation , Thrombosis/etiology
13.
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis ; 14: 1753944720924270, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32459138

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the extent to which routine care management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and intermittent claudication (IC) align with best practice recommendations on exercise therapy. We conducted a scoping review to examine the published literature on the availability and workings of exercise therapy in the routine management of patients with PAD and IC, and the attitude and practice of health professionals and patients. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in February 2018. The Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Ovid MEDLINE, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, ScienceDirect, Web of Science and the Directory of Open Access Repositories were searched. Hand searching of reference lists of identified studies was also performed. Inclusion criteria were based on study aim, and included studies that reported on the perceptions, practices, and workings of routine exercise programs for patients with IC, their availability, access, and perceived barriers. RESULTS: Eight studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Studies conducted within Europe were included. Findings indicated that vascular surgeons in parts of Europe generally recognize supervised exercise therapy as a best practice treatment for IC, but do not often refer their patients for supervised exercise therapy due to the unavailability of, or lack of access to supervised exercise therapy programs. Available supervised exercise therapy programs do not implement best practice recommendations, and in the majority, patients only undergo one session per week. Some challenges were cited as the cause of the suboptimal program implementation. These included issues related to patients' engagement and adherence as well as resource constraints. CONCLUSION: There is a dearth of published research on exercise therapy in the routine management of PAD and IC. Available data from a few countries within Europe indicated that supervised exercise is underutilized despite health professionals recognizing the benefits. Research is needed to understand how to improve the availability, access, uptake, and adherence to the best exercise recommendations in the routine management of people with PAD and IC.


Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy , Intermittent Claudication/therapy , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Attitude of Health Personnel , Exercise Therapy/adverse effects , Exercise Tolerance , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Status , Humans , Intermittent Claudication/diagnostic imaging , Intermittent Claudication/physiopathology , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnostic imaging , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Recovery of Function , Treatment Outcome
14.
Vasc Med ; 25(4): 354-363, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32303155

ABSTRACT

Lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) induces an ischemic pain in the lower limbs and leads to walking impairment. Electrical stimulation has been used in patients with PAD, but no systematic review has been proposed to address the efficacy of the technique as a treatment for walking impairment in PAD. A systematic search was performed to identify trials focused on electrical stimulation for the treatment of walking impairment in patients with PAD in the Cochrane Central Register, PubMed, Embase, and the Web of Science. Studies were included where the primary outcomes were pain-free walking distance and/or maximal walking distance. When appropriate, eligible studies were independently assessed for quality using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias. Five studies eligible for inclusion were identified, of which only two were randomized controlled studies. Trial heterogeneity prevented the use of the GRADE system and the implementation of a meta-analysis. Three types of electrical stimulation have been used: neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES, n = 3), transcutaneous electrical stimulation (n = 1), and functional electrical stimulation (n = 1). The two available randomized controlled studies reported a significant improvement in maximal walking distance (+40 m/+34% and +39 m/+35%, respectively) following a program of NMES. Owing to the low number of eligible studies, small sample size, and the risk of bias, no clear clinical indication can be drawn regarding the efficacy of electrical stimulation for the management of impaired walking function in patients with PAD. Future high-quality studies are required to define objectively the effect of electrical stimulation on walking capacity.


Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy , Exercise Tolerance , Intermittent Claudication/therapy , Lower Extremity/innervation , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Walking , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Intermittent Claudication/diagnosis , Intermittent Claudication/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Recovery of Function , Treatment Outcome
15.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 54(2): 126-134, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31709914

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Revascularization is the cornerstone of the treatment of critical limb ischemia (CLI), but the number of elderly frail patients increase. Revascularization is not always possible in these patients and conservative therapy seems to be an option. The goals of this study are to analyze the 1-year quality of life (QoL) results and mortality rates of elderly patients with CLI and to investigate if conservative treatment could be an acceptable treatment option. METHODS: Patients with CLI ≥70 years old were included in a prospective observational cohort study in 2 hospitals in the Netherlands between 2012 and 2016 and were divided over 3 treatment modalities: endovascular therapy, surgical revascularization, and conservative treatment. The World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQoL-Bref) instrument, a generic QoL assessment tool that includes components of physical, psychological, social relationships and environment, was used to evaluate QoL at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year. RESULTS: In total, 195 patients (56% male, 33% Rutherford 4, mean age of 80) were included. Physical QoL significantly increased after surgical (10.4 vs 14.9, P < .001), endovascular (10.9 vs 13.7, P < .001), and conservative therapy (11.6 vs 13.2, P = .01) at 1 year. One-year mortality was relatively low after surgery (10%) compared to endovascular (40%) and conservative therapy (37%). CONCLUSION: The results of this study could not be used to designate the superior treatment used in elderly patients with CLI. Conservative treatment could be an acceptable treatment option in selected patients with CLI unfit for revascularization. Treatment of choice in elderly patients with CLI is based on multiple factors and should be individualized in a shared decision-making process.


Subject(s)
Conservative Treatment , Endovascular Procedures , Ischemia/therapy , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Quality of Life , Vascular Surgical Procedures , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Conservative Treatment/adverse effects , Conservative Treatment/mortality , Critical Illness , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Female , Humans , Ischemia/diagnostic imaging , Ischemia/mortality , Ischemia/physiopathology , Male , Netherlands , Patient Selection , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnostic imaging , Peripheral Arterial Disease/mortality , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Vascular Surgical Procedures/mortality
16.
Wound Repair Regen ; 28(2): 266-275, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31667898

ABSTRACT

Diabetic foot ulcers are a common complication of diabetes, which affects 25% of patients and may ultimately lead to amputation of affected limbs. Research suggests hyperbaric oxygen therapy improves healing of these ulcers. However, this has not been reflected in previous reviews, possibly because they did not differentiate between patients with and without peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Therefore, we performed a systematic review of published literature in the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases on nonischemic diabetic foot ulcers with outcome measures including complete ulcer healing, amputation rate (major and minor), and mortality. Seven studies were included, of which two were randomized clinical trials. Two studies found no difference in major amputation rate, whereas one large retrospective study found 2% more major amputations in the hyperbaric oxygen group. However, this study did not correct for baseline differences. Two studies showed no significant difference in minor amputation rate. Five studies reporting on complete wound healing showed no significant differences. In conclusion, the current evidence suggests that hyperbaric oxygen therapy does not accelerate wound healing and does not prevent major or minor amputations in patients with a diabetic foot ulcer without peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Based on the available evidence, routine clinical use of this therapy cannot be recommended. However, the available research for this specific subgroup of patients is scarce, and physicians should counsel patients on expected risks and benefits. Additional research, focusing especially on patient selection criteria, is needed to better identify patients that might profit from this therapy modality.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Foot/therapy , Hyperbaric Oxygenation , Wound Healing , Amputation, Surgical , Diabetic Foot/complications , Diabetic Foot/physiopathology , Humans , Ischemia/complications , Ischemia/physiopathology , Peripheral Arterial Disease/complications , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome
17.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 63: 45-52, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31563660

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Case studies and reviews have shown that creatine supplementation can affect kidney function. The objective of this study is to verify the effects of 8 weeks of creatine supplementation on renal function (creatinine clearance: primary outcome) in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients, of both genders, were randomized (1:1) in a double-blind manner for administration of Placebo (PLA; n = 15) or creatine monohydrate (Cr; n = 14). The supplementation protocol consisted of 20 g/day for 1 week divided into 4 equal doses (loading phase), followed by single daily doses of 5 g in the subsequent 7 weeks (maintenance phase). Before and after the supplementation period, markers of renal function, serum creatinine, creatinine excretion rate, and creatinine clearance were evaluated. The Generalized Estimation Equation Model was used for comparison between groups. The level of significance was P < 0.05. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between groups before and after the intervention for serum creatinine (Cr: pre 1.00 ± 0.15 mL/dL vs. post 1.07 ± 0.16 mL/dL; PLA: pre 1.30 ± 0.53 mL/dL vs. post 1.36 ± 0.47 mL/dL, P = 0.590), creatinine excretion rate (Cr: pre 81.73 ± 43.80 mg/dL vs. post 102.92 ± 59.57 mg/dL; PLA: pre 74.37 ± 38.90 mg/dL vs. post 86.22 ± 39.94 mg/dL, P = 0.560), or creatinine clearance (Cr; pre 108 ± 59 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs. post 117 ± 52 mL/min/1.73 m2; PLA: pre 88 ± 49 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs. post 82 ± 47 mL/min/1.73 m2, P = 0.366). CONCLUSIONS: Eight weeks of creatine supplementation is safe and does not compromise the renal function of patients with peripheral arterial disease.


Subject(s)
Creatine/administration & dosage , Dietary Supplements , Glomerular Filtration Rate/drug effects , Kidney/drug effects , Peripheral Arterial Disease/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brazil , Creatine/adverse effects , Creatinine/blood , Creatinine/urine , Dietary Supplements/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Kidney/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Renal Elimination/drug effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
18.
J Endovasc Ther ; 27(1): 94-101, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31746264

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To investigate the utilization of local anesthesia or peripheral nerve block with monitored anesthesia care (LPMAC) and its impact on the perioperative outcomes of hybrid lower extremity revascularization (LER) compared with general anesthesia (GA). Materials and Methods: A search of the ACS-NSQIP database between 2005 and 2017 identified 9430 patients who underwent hybrid LER for peripheral artery disease. Excluding 449 ineligible cases left 8981 hybrid LER patients for analysis. The patients were dichotomized based on the anesthetic technique: 8631 (96.1%) GA and 350 (3.9%) LPMAC. The GA patients were matched 3:1 based on propensity scores to patients in the LPMAC group based on gender, age, race, functional status, transfer status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dialysis status, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, emergent surgery, preoperative sepsis, indication, and type of open and endovascular procedure. Outcomes including complications, mortality, procedure time, and hospital length of stay were compared between the matched groups (801 GA vs 267 LPMAC). Results: Comparing the unmatched groups, those treated under LPMAC were older (72.7±9 vs 68±8.4 years, p<0.001) and had higher rates of COPD (24.3% vs 17%, p=0.001), dialysis dependence (8.1% vs 4.2%, p=0.002), preoperative sepsis (6.6% vs 4.2%, p=0.029), and ASA class ≥IV (29.1% vs 24.1%, p=0.036) than in the unmatched GA cohort. In the matched comparison, LPMAC was associated with lower overall morbidity (25.5% vs 32.3%, p=0.042) and shorter operating time (202.7±98 vs 217.7±102 minutes, p=0.034) compared with GA. The rate of myocardial infarction was lower (1.1% vs 2.4%) and ventilator use for >48 hours was less frequent (0.4% vs 2.6%) for LPMAC patients, though statistical significance was not reached. There was no difference in mortality or hospital length of stay. Conclusion: LPMAC is an infrequent anesthetic technique for hybrid LER and is primarily used for patients with a high burden of comorbidities. LPMAC is associated with reduced overall morbidity and operating time. Further studies are needed to identify which patients undergoing hybrid LER benefit most from LPMAC.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, General , Anesthesia, Local , Endovascular Procedures , Lower Extremity/blood supply , Lower Extremity/innervation , Nerve Block , Peripheral Arterial Disease/surgery , Vascular Surgical Procedures , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anesthesia, General/adverse effects , Anesthesia, Local/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nerve Block/adverse effects , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnostic imaging , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects
19.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 61: 83-90, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31382005

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether functional electrical stimulation (FES) is able to improve ischemic pain and quality of life of patients with diabetic arteriopathy (DA) in grade-IIa Leriche-Le Fontaine. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a single-blinded, randomized, prospective cohort study. We included patients diagnosed with grade-IIa Leriche-Le Fontaine peripheral arterial disease in both lower extremities with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). The ankle-brachial index was 0.4-0.9. Patients were randomized into two experimental groups: nondiabetic (non-DM) (n = 71) and diabetic (DM) (n = 71). The patients received FES while walking for 1 hr on a supervised treadmill. Three months of follow-up were conducted after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 168 patients were randomized; 142 completed the study, with 71 in each group. Both groups reported an improvement after the treatment, but the improvement was statistically significant in the DM group, in which all the parameters studied improved. Greater benefits were observed in all the parameters in the DM group after the follow-up, except for the test of the meters walked in 6 min. CONCLUSIONS: The use of FES during daily walking is effective in patients with DA, reducing intermittent claudication and improving the quality of life of these patients.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Angiopathies/therapy , Electric Stimulation Therapy , Exercise Therapy , Exercise Tolerance , Intermittent Claudication/therapy , Ischemia/therapy , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Aged , Combined Modality Therapy , Diabetic Angiopathies/diagnosis , Diabetic Angiopathies/physiopathology , Double-Blind Method , Electric Stimulation Therapy/adverse effects , Exercise Therapy/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Intermittent Claudication/diagnosis , Intermittent Claudication/physiopathology , Ischemia/diagnosis , Ischemia/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Recovery of Function , Spain , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Walking
20.
Br J Nutr ; 122(6): 698-706, 2019 09 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31262371

ABSTRACT

As only limited evidence is available for potential benefits of n-3 PUFA supplementation in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), we studied the effects of 4 g n-3 PUFA on endothelial function and inflammatory markers. Seventy patients with stable PAD classified as Rutherford stage 2 or 3 and good control of cardiovascular factors were randomised to receive either 4 g n-3 PUFA or placebo daily for 3 months in a double-blind fashion. Primary endpoint was endothelial function assessed by flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD). In addition, ankle-brachial index, maximum and pain-free walking distances were determined. Lipid parameters including the omega-3 index reflecting n-3 PUFA intake as well as pro-inflammatory, endothelial and platelet activation markers were measured over the same time interval. After 3 months of treatment with 4 g n-3 PUFA daily, a significant improvement of FMD was observed compared with placebo (n-3 PUFA, median Δ 3·7 (interquartile range (IQR) -1·8, 7·1) % v. placebo, Δ -0·5 (IQR -6·5, 3·0) %, P = 0·01 between the groups). After a 3-month washout period, this benefit was not sustained (n-3 PUFA, median Δ 0·6 (IQR -2·2, 5·6) % v. placebo, Δ -0·9 (IQR -6·6, 6·7) %, P = 0·20). In response to n-3 PUFA, an improvement of lipid parameters with a pronounced increase in the omega-3 index was seen. No changes were found for other parameters. In conclusion, in patients with PAD, 4 g/d n-3 PUFA improved cardiovascular risk in PAD patients, which needs testing in large-scale trials.


Subject(s)
Endothelium, Vascular/drug effects , Fatty Acids, Omega-3/pharmacology , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Aged , Double-Blind Method , Fatty Acids, Omega-3/administration & dosage , Fatty Acids, Omega-3/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Placebos
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL