Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 621
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Curr Neuropharmacol ; 22(4): 557-635, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37132142

ABSTRACT

This narrative state-of-the-art review paper describes the progress in the understanding and treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Over the last four decades, the scientific landscape has matured, with many interdisciplinary contributions to understanding its diagnosis, etiology, and epidemiology. Advances in genetics, neurobiology, stress pathophysiology, and brain imaging have made it apparent that chronic PTSD is a systemic disorder with high allostatic load. The current state of PTSD treatment includes a wide variety of pharmacological and psychotherapeutic approaches, of which many are evidence-based. However, the myriad challenges inherent in the disorder, such as individual and systemic barriers to good treatment outcome, comorbidity, emotional dysregulation, suicidality, dissociation, substance use, and trauma-related guilt and shame, often render treatment response suboptimal. These challenges are discussed as drivers for emerging novel treatment approaches, including early interventions in the Golden Hours, pharmacological and psychotherapeutic interventions, medication augmentation interventions, the use of psychedelics, as well as interventions targeting the brain and nervous system. All of this aims to improve symptom relief and clinical outcomes. Finally, a phase orientation to treatment is recognized as a tool to strategize treatment of the disorder, and position interventions in step with the progression of the pathophysiology. Revisions to guidelines and systems of care will be needed to incorporate innovative treatments as evidence emerges and they become mainstream. This generation is well-positioned to address the devastating and often chronic disabling impact of traumatic stress events through holistic, cutting-edge clinical efforts and interdisciplinary research.


Subject(s)
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Substance-Related Disorders , Humans , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/drug therapy , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Substance-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Brain
2.
Acad Pediatr ; 24(1): 68-77, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37302698

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic created challenges in accessing mental health (MH) services when adolescent well-being declined. Still, little is known about how the COVID-19 pandemic affected outpatient MH service utilization for adolescents. METHODS: Retrospective data were collected from electronic medical records of adolescents aged 12-17 years at Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic States, an integrated health care system from January 2019 to December 2021. MH diagnoses included anxiety, mood disorder/depression, anxiety and mood disorder/depression, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, or psychosis. We used interrupted time series analysis to compare MH visits and psychopharmaceutical prescribing before and after the COVID-19 onset. Analyses were stratified by demographics and visit modality. RESULTS: The study population of 8121 adolescents with MH visits resulted in a total of 61,971 (28.1%) of the 220,271 outpatient visits associated with an MH diagnosis. During 15,771 (7.2%) adolescent outpatient visits psychotropic medications were prescribed. The increasing rate of MH visits prior to COVID-19 was unaffected by COVID-19 onset; however, in-person visits declined by 230.5 visits per week (P < .001) from 274.5 visits per week coupled with a rise in virtual modalities. Rates of MH visits during the COVID-19 pandemic differed by sex, mental health diagnosis, and racial and ethnic identity. Psychopharmaceutical prescribing during MH visits declined beyond expected values by a mean of 32.8 visits per week (P < .001) at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: A sustained switch to virtual visits highlights a new paradigm in care modalities for adolescents. Psychopharmaceutical prescribing declined requiring further qualitative assessments to improve the quality of access for adolescent MH.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , COVID-19 , Mental Health Services , Humans , Adolescent , Retrospective Studies , Outpatients , Pandemics , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use
3.
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J ; 23(2): 190-197, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37377817

ABSTRACT

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate parental attitude towards psychotropic drugs' use for children's mental disorders. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2020 to March 2021 at the Department of Behavioural Medicine, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman. A questionnaire was used to determine parents' opinions and attitudes about use of psychotropic medications on their children and, in a small proportion, other caregivers if the child attended with them. Risk factors associated with parents who preferred to consult a folk healer (FH) for children with mental disorders were identified by the logistic regression model. Results: A total of 299 parents participating in the study (response rate: 95.2%). Most (n = 244, 81.6%) agreed to give their child psychotropic medications if necessary, but 25.4% (n = 76) would consult an FH before a psychiatrist. Married parents were 14.5 times (P = 0.011) more likely than separated or divorced parents to consult an FH. Caregivers with a monthly income below 500 OMR and between 500 and 1,000 OMR were 2.5 (P = 0.016) and 3.2 times (P <0.001), respectively, more likely than those with more than 1,000 OMR to consult an FH. Parents who disagreed with giving their children psychotropic medications were 3.8 times (P <0.001) more likely to consult an FH than parents who agreed to give them if necessary. Conclusion: Most parents agreed to give their children psychotropic medications if necessary. However, a proportion of parents and caregivers preferred to consult an FH before accessing mental health services.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders , Parents , Humans , Child , Oman , Cross-Sectional Studies , Tertiary Healthcare , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Prescriptions , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Hospitals
4.
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am ; 32(2): 217-241, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37147038

ABSTRACT

Substance use disorders are a growing concern for all ages, including adolescents. Even though there is an increase in recreational substance use and a wider variety of drugs is available to this young population, treatment options remain scarce. Most medications have limited evidence in this population. Few specialists treat individuals struggling with addiction along with mental health disorders. As the evidence grows, these treatments are usually included in complementary and integrative medicine. This article discusses available evidence for many complementary and integrative treatment approaches while briefly describing existing psychotherapeutic and psychotropic medications.


Subject(s)
Behavior, Addictive , Integrative Medicine , Substance-Related Disorders , Adolescent , Humans , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use
5.
J Intellect Disabil Res ; 67(12): 1291-1305, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36372946

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: People with intellectual disability (ID) are a vulnerable group in our society; many of them depend on other people for assistance in their everyday lives. Compared with the general population, people with ID have poorer general health and, therefore, need more healthcare services and use more medicines. The aim of this study is to define the population of all Finnish people with ID using administrative data and to compare their medicine use and expenditure on medicines to those of the age-matched and sex-matched controls. METHODS: People with ID and their age-matched and sex-matched controls (1:1) were extracted from nationwide healthcare and social allowance registers. Administrative register data on all prescription medicine purchases in 2019 were used to determine the prevalence of medicine use in both groups on a general level and by medicine categories. The differences in the prevalence of medicine use between the two groups were analysed using the logistic regression model. In addition, we studied the total expenditure on reimbursable medicine purchases covered by the National Health Insurance between people with ID and control group. RESULTS: The subpopulation of people with ID consisted 37 196 individuals, of whom 82.7% purchased prescription medicines in 2019. The corresponding share of individuals purchasing prescription medicines in the control group was 70.3%. The differences in the prevalence of medicine use between the two populations were highest in the younger age groups (0-6, 7-12 and 13-17). In the study population, 28.1% (OR = 12.28; 95% CI: 11.54-13.07) of the people used antipsychotics, making it the most used medicine category in people with ID. In the control group, 3.3% of people used antipsychotics. Compared with the control group, the use of antiepileptics, drugs for constipation, mineral supplements and anxiolytics was four to seven times higher among people with ID. Furthermore, the median expenditure on medicine use among people with ID was four times higher than in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the control group, people with ID used more medicines, especially psychotropics, and their expenditure on medicine use was higher.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Intellectual Disability , Humans , Intellectual Disability/epidemiology , Intellectual Disability/drug therapy , Finland/epidemiology , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use
6.
Biol Pharm Bull ; 45(7): 834-842, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35786590

ABSTRACT

Recently, the concept of psychonephrology was developed and has been recognized as a field of study that focuses on nephrology and mental health fields, such as psychiatry and psychosomatic medicine. Indeed, patients with chronic kidney disease frequently suffer from mental problems as the disease stage progresses. Most psychotropic drugs are hepatically metabolized, but some are unmetabolized and eliminated renally. However, renal disease may affect the pharmacokinetics of many psychotropic drugs, as the decreased renal function not only delays the urinary excretion of the drug and its metabolites but also alters various pharmacokinetic factors, such as protein-binding, enterohepatic circulation, and activity of drug-metabolizing enzymes. Therefore, when prescribing drug therapy for patients with both renal disease and mental issues, we should consider reducing the dosage of psychotropic drugs that are eliminated mainly via the kidney and also carefully monitor the blood drug concentrations of other drugs with a high extrarenal clearance, such as those that are largely metabolized in the liver. Furthermore, we should carefully consider the dialyzability of each psychotropic drug, as the dialyzability impacts the drug clearance in patients with end-stage renal failure undergoing dialysis. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may be a useful tool for adjusting the dosage of psychotropic drugs appropriately in patients with renal disease. We herein review the pharmacokinetic considerations for psychotropic drugs in patients with renal disease as well as those undergoing dialysis and offer new insight concerning TDM in the field of psychonephrology.


Subject(s)
Kidney Failure, Chronic , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Drug Monitoring , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/drug therapy , Psychotropic Drugs/adverse effects , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Renal Dialysis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/chemically induced
7.
Int Psychogeriatr ; 34(10): 919-928, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35546289

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effectiveness of an integrated care pathway (ICP), including a medication algorithm, to treat agitation associated with dementia. DESIGN: Analyses of data (both prospective and retrospective) collected during routine clinical care. SETTING: Geriatric Psychiatry Inpatient Unit. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with agitation associated with dementia (n = 28) who were treated as part of the implementation of the ICP and those who received treatment-as-usual (TAU) (n = 28) on the same inpatient unit before the implementation of the ICP. Two control groups of patients without dementia treated on the same unit contemporaneously to the TAU (n = 17) and ICP groups (n = 36) were included to account for any secular trends. INTERVENTION: ICP. MEASUREMENTS: Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI), Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPIQ), and assessment of motor symptoms were completed during the ICP implementation. Chart review was used to obtain length of inpatient stay and rates of psychotropic polypharmacy. RESULTS: Patients in the ICP group experienced a reduction in their scores on the CMAI and NPIQ and no changes in motor symptoms. Compared to the TAU group, the ICP group had a higher chance of an earlier discharge from hospital, a lower rate of psychotropic polypharmacy, and a lower chance of having a fall during hospital stay. In contrast, these outcomes did not differ between the two control groups. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest that an ICP can be used effectively to treat agitation associated with dementia in inpatients. A larger randomized study is needed to confirm these results.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Dementia , Aged , Dementia/complications , Dementia/diagnosis , Dementia/therapy , Geriatric Psychiatry , Humans , Inpatients , Prospective Studies , Psychomotor Agitation/diagnosis , Psychomotor Agitation/etiology , Psychomotor Agitation/therapy , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies
8.
Viruses ; 13(7)2021 06 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34206839

ABSTRACT

The persistence of human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV)-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) in the era of effective antiretroviral therapy suggests that modern HIV neuropathogenesis is driven, at least in part, by mechanisms distinct from the viral life cycle. Identifying more subtle mechanisms is complicated by frequent comorbidities in HIV+ populations. One of the common confounds is substance abuse, with cannabis being the most frequently used psychoactive substance among people living with HIV. The psychoactive effects of cannabis use can themselves mimic, and perhaps magnify, the cognitive deficits observed in HAND; however, the neuromodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties of cannabinoids may counter HIV-induced excitotoxicity and neuroinflammation. Here, we review our understanding of the cross talk between HIV and cannabinoids in the central nervous system by exploring both clinical observations and evidence from preclinical in vivo and in vitro models. Additionally, we comment on recent advances in human, multi-cell in vitro systems that allow for more translatable, mechanistic studies of the relationship between cannabinoid pharmacology and this uniquely human virus.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Cannabinoids/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/therapy , HIV-1/drug effects , Neuroinflammatory Diseases/therapy , Animals , Anti-HIV Agents/pharmacology , Cannabinoids/pharmacology , Cannabinoids/standards , Clinical Trials as Topic , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Mice , Psychotropic Drugs/pharmacology , Psychotropic Drugs/standards , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use
9.
Biomolecules ; 11(4)2021 04 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33924103

ABSTRACT

Parkinson's disease (PD) usually presents in older adults and typically has both motor and non-motor dysfunctions. PD is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder resulting from dopaminergic neuronal cell loss in the mid-brain substantia nigra pars compacta region. Outlined here is an integrative medicine and health strategy that highlights five treatment options for people with Parkinson's (PwP): rehabilitate, therapy, restorative, maintenance, and surgery. Rehabilitating begins following the diagnosis and throughout any additional treatment processes, especially vis-à-vis consulting with physical, occupational, and/or speech pathology therapist(s). Therapy uses daily administration of either the dopamine precursor levodopa (with carbidopa) or a dopamine agonist, compounds that preserve residual dopamine, and other specific motor/non-motor-related compounds. Restorative uses strenuous aerobic exercise programs that can be neuroprotective. Maintenance uses complementary and alternative medicine substances that potentially support and protect the brain microenvironment. Finally, surgery, including deep brain stimulation, is pursued when PwP fail to respond positively to other treatment options. There is currently no cure for PD. In conclusion, the best strategy for treating PD is to hope to slow disorder progression and strive to achieve stability with neuroprotection. The ultimate goal of any management program is to improve the quality-of-life for a person with Parkinson's disease.


Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Animals , Antiparkinson Agents/administration & dosage , Antiparkinson Agents/adverse effects , Clinical Trials as Topic , Deep Brain Stimulation/adverse effects , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Exercise Therapy/methods , Humans , Movement , Parkinson Disease/rehabilitation , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Psychotropic Drugs/administration & dosage , Psychotropic Drugs/adverse effects
10.
PLoS One ; 16(3): e0248649, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33735176

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease (SCD) induces chronic haemolytic anaemia and intermittent vaso-occlusion that results in tissue ischaemia causing acute, severe pain episodes that can lead to frequent hospitalizations. These consequences can have repercussions on family, social, school and/or professional life. Here, we present some of the results of the PHEDRE study (Pharmacodépendance Et DREpanocytose-drug dependence and sickle-cell disease), which is the largest study of patients with SCD in France. This paper intends to describe characteristics of the French SCD population. We also aimed to assess the impact of the disease on the lives of patients using objective and subjective variables. METHODS: The PHEDRE study was a national multicentric observational study. Adults, adolescents and children with a confirmed SCD diagnosis were included in the study by their referring doctor. Then, they were interviewed by phone about their socioeconomic status, about the impact of the disease on their lives and about their analgesic and psychoactive drug use. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 872 patients (28% were minors). Seventy-two percent of adults were active, and all minors were in school. Many patients presented criteria of severe SCD. Seventy-five percent were homozygous SS, 15% were double heterozygotes SC and 8% were heterozygotes Sßthal, 87% received specific treatment, 58% were hospitalized at least once for vaso-occlusive crisis in the past 12 months, and the number of analgesic drugs taken averaged 3.8. Seventy-five percent of patients reported academic or professional consequences related to their SCD, and 52% reported social consequences. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of SCD on patients' lives can be significant, nevertheless their social integration seems to be maintained. We highlighted respect of recommendations regarding analgesic treatments and only a few patients used tobacco, alcohol or cannabis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials, NCT02580565; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ Registered 16 October 2015.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/therapeutic use , Anemia, Sickle Cell/drug therapy , Pain Management/methods , Pain/drug therapy , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anemia, Sickle Cell/complications , Anemia, Sickle Cell/diagnosis , Anemia, Sickle Cell/psychology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/diagnosis , Pain/etiology , Pain Management/statistics & numerical data , Pain Measurement , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
11.
Ann Clin Psychiatry ; 33(2): 124-133, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33529291

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Panic disorder (PD) is a devastating illness, with numerous patients experiencing significant functional disability and many not achieving full remission with first-line pharmacologic and psychotherapeutic treatments. METHODS: A search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and PsychINFO databases was used to identify publications focused on evidence-based treatment of PD. RESULTS: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and benzodiazepines are standard first-line pharmacologic treatments for PD. Many other antidepressants can be considered as alternatives to SSRIs, including serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, serotonin multimodal agents, tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, and mirtazapine. Certain anticonvulsants and antipsychotics may be helpful; however, the evidence base is limited. Buspirone, beta blockers, and hydroxyzine can be considered third-line agents. Currently, there is minimal data supporting the use of electroconvulsive therapy or repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). There is very little evidence justifying the use of medical cannabis or over-the-counter supplements for PD, and these treatments have risk for adverse effects. Research strongly supports the use of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for PD. CONCLUSIONS: Many options exist for the management of PD. Treatments with the strongest evidence include SSRIs, other antidepressants, and CBT. Newer interventions approved for the treatment of depression, such as serotonin multimodal agents, esketamine, and rTMS, merit further investigation for use in PD.


Subject(s)
Panic Disorder , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic/therapeutic use , Humans , Panic Disorder/drug therapy , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use
12.
J Ethnopharmacol ; 272: 113952, 2021 May 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33610705

ABSTRACT

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: There are plant species used in the Mexican traditional medicine for the empirical treatment of anxiety and depression. AIM OF THE STUDY: This work assessed the prevalence of self-medication with medicinal plants and the prevalence of the concomitant use of prescribed psychiatric drugs and medicinal plants for treating symptoms associated with anxiety and depression during the Covid-19 lockdown in Mexico. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The suspected adverse reactions associated with drug-herb interactions were assessed. The factors associated with self-medication, the concomitant use of herb-drug combinations, and the presence of adverse reactions due their combined use is also reported. The study was descriptive and cross-sectional using an online questionnaire conducted among population with symptoms associated with anxiety and depression (n = 2100) from seven states of central-western Mexico. RESULTS: The prevalence of the use of herbs (61.9%) and the concomitant use of drug-herb combinations (25.3%) were associated with being diagnosed with mental illness [OR:2.195 (1.655-2.912)] and the use of psychiatric medications [OR:307.994 (178.609-531.107)], respectively. The presence of adverse reactions (n = 104) by the concomitant use of drug-herb combinations was associated with being unemployed [p = 0.004, OR: 3.017 (1.404-6.486)]. CONCLUSION: Health professionals should be aware if their patients concomitantly use medicinal plants and psychiatric drugs. Public health campaigns should promote the possible adverse reactions that might produce the concomitant use of drug-herb combinations for mental illnesses.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/drug therapy , COVID-19/psychology , Depression/drug therapy , Pandemics , Plant Preparations/adverse effects , Plant Preparations/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Communicable Disease Control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Interactions , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Mental Disorders/psychology , Mexico/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Plants, Medicinal , Prevalence , Psychotropic Drugs/adverse effects , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Self Care , Surveys and Questionnaires , Unemployment/psychology , Young Adult
13.
Curr Med Chem ; 28(1): 53-68, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31830883

ABSTRACT

In the drug development, the formation of highly selective ligands has been unsuccessful in the treatment of central nervous system disorders. Multi-target ligands, from the polypharmacology paradigm, are being proposed as treatments for these complex disorders, since they offer enhanced efficacy and a strong safety profile. Natural products are the best examples of multi-target compounds, so they are of high interest within this paradigm. Additionally, recent research on psychoactive drugs of natural origin, such as ayahuasca and cannabis, has demonstrated the promising therapeutic potential for the treatment of some psychiatric and neurological disorders. In this text, we describe how research on psychoactive drugs can be effectively combined with the polypharmacology paradigm, providing ayahuasca and cannabis research as examples. The advantages and disadvantages are also discussed.


Subject(s)
Biological Products , Central Nervous System Diseases , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Central Nervous System Diseases/drug therapy , Humans , Polypharmacology
14.
Am J Med Genet A ; 182(7): 1735-1743, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32449279

ABSTRACT

Data on clinical characteristics of adults with Down syndrome (DS) are limited and the clinical phenotype of these persons is poorly described. This study aimed to describe the occurrence of chronic diseases and pattern of medication use in a population of adults with DS. Participants were 421 community dwelling adults with DS, aged 18 years or older. Individuals were assessed through a standardized clinical protocol. Multimorbidity was defined as the occurrence of two or more chronic conditions and polypharmacy as the concomitant use of five or more medications. The mean age of study participants was 38.3 ± 12.8 years and 214 (51%) were women. Three hundred and seventy-four participants (88.8%) presented with multimorbidity. The most prevalent condition was visual impairment (72.9%), followed by thyroid disease (50.1%) and hearing impairment (26.8%). Chronic diseases were more prevalent among participants aged >40 years. The mean number of medications used was 2.09 and polypharmacy was observed in 10.5% of the study sample. Psychotropic medications were used by a mean of 0.7 individuals of the total sample. The high prevalence of multimorbidity and the common use of multiple medications contributes to a high level of clinical complexity, which appears to be similar to the degree of complexity of the older non-trisomic population. A comprehensive and holistic approach, commonly adopted in geriatric medicine, may provide the most appropriate care to persons with DS as they grow into adulthood.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Down Syndrome/epidemiology , Psychotropic Drugs/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Down Syndrome/complications , Down Syndrome/drug therapy , Down Syndrome/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multimorbidity , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Young Adult
16.
Psychiatry Res ; 288: 112940, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32344316

ABSTRACT

Persistent use of cannabis in persons with psychosis is associated with poor symptomatic and functional outcomes and increased healthcare costs. Face-to-face psychological interventions (e.g., Cognitive Behavioral Therapy- [CBT], Motivation Enhancement Therapy- [MET]) are widely used in treating problematic cannabis use. We aimed to comprehensively review the efficacy of technology-based psychological interventions (TBPIs) in decreasing cannabis use, the design of TBPIs, and TBPI-related preferences in individuals with psychosis. For the systematic review, we searched six major databases from their inception to November 27, 2019. We included empirical articles of quantitative and qualitative methodologies related to TBPIs in individuals with psychosis and cannabis misuse and used narrative synthesis to report results. Only eight articles were found showing that technology-based motivational and psycho-education interventions and cognitive enhancement therapy were minimally efficient in achieving cannabis abstinence or decreasing frequency of use. Qualitative exploratory methods and participatory action research were used to elicit patient and clinician preferences and TBPIs were tailored accordingly to improve cannabis use related outcomes. Research on TBPIs in individuals with psychosis and cannabis misuse is in its early phases. A significant research effort is needed for the development of adapted interventions for CUD to capitalize on the potential of web-based applications.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Marijuana Abuse/therapy , Motivational Interviewing/methods , Psychotic Disorders/therapy , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Female , Hallucinogens/pharmacology , Hallucinogens/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Marijuana Abuse/epidemiology , Marijuana Abuse/psychology , Marijuana Smoking/epidemiology , Marijuana Smoking/psychology , Marijuana Smoking/therapy , Motivation/drug effects , Motivation/physiology , Psychotic Disorders/epidemiology , Psychotic Disorders/psychology
17.
J Clin Psychopharmacol ; 40(3): 269-275, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32332462

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Homeopathy is a complementary and alternative medicine. Conclusive evidence on the plausibility, efficacy, and safety of these treatments is not currently available. Nonetheless, homeopathic remedies (HRs) are widespread throughout the world and especially in mental disorders. The aim is to assess the efficacy of HRs in the treatment of mental disorders. METHODS/PROCEDURES: We performed a Medline/Embase search for studies written in English and published from any date to October 23, 2018. All randomized controlled trials enrolling patients with any psychiatric disorder and comparing HR with placebo, no treatment, or other psychotropic drugs were included. FINDINGS/RESULTS: A total of 212 studies were screened, 9 met all selection criteria and reported data on major depressive disorder (MDD) (n = 4), generalized anxiety disorder (n = 1), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (n = 2), and premenstrual syndrome/dysphoric disorder (n = 2). Eight of 9 randomized controlled trials showed high risk of bias. Homeopathy showed greater efficacy in MDD compared with fluoxetine, and in premenstrual syndrome/dysphoric disorder compared with placebo, whereas no difference emerged between homeopathy and placebo in MDD and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Available data on homeopathy in psychiatric disorders are insufficient to support their use in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Homeopathy/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/therapy , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
18.
Tijdschr Psychiatr ; 62(3): 223-228, 2020.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32207132

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is no national protocol for the use of light therapy in bipolar depression.
AIM: The chronotherapy collaboration group of the Foundation for Bipolar Disorders intended to write a protocol for light therapy in bipolar depressive episodes.
METHOD: Narrative review of several systematic reviews, two clinician's guides and deliberation with the sub-commission Guidelines of the Dutch Ophthalmologic Society.
RESULTS: The following indication was established: depressive episode, with or without seasonal features, in bipolar I or II disorder, including subsyndromal (depressive) seasonal complaints. The list of relative contra-indications (pre-existent retinal illnesses, systemic illnesses with effect on the retina and use of photosensitive medication) was shortened. In this case the medical professional discusses the possibility of an ophthalmologic consultation with the patient. Use of a mood stabilizer/antimanic medication in order to prevent mania or a mixed episode is only necessary in a depressive episode in bipolar I, but not in bipolar II disorder. Standard treatment is 10.000 lux white light during 30 minutes in the morning.
CONCLUSION: There is sufficient evidence to propose light therapy in a bipolar depressive episode with or without seasonal features.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder , Phototherapy , Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Humans , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Review Literature as Topic
19.
An Bras Dermatol ; 95(2): 133-143, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32171543

ABSTRACT

Patients with psychocutaneous disorders often refuse psychiatric intervention in their first consultations, leaving initial management to the dermatologist. The use of psychotropic agents in dermatological practice, represented by antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, and mood stabilizers, should be indicated so that patients receive the most suitable treatment rapidly. It is important for dermatologists to be familiar with the most commonly used drugs for the best management of psychiatric symptoms associated with dermatoses, as well as to manage dermatologic symptoms triggered by psychiatric disorders.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Psychophysiologic Disorders/drug therapy , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Skin Diseases/drug therapy , Skin Diseases/psychology , Dermatology , Female , Humans , Male , Risk Factors
20.
An. bras. dermatol ; 95(2): 133-143, Mar.-Apr. 2020. tab
Article in English | LILACS, ColecionaSUS | ID: biblio-1130860

ABSTRACT

Abstract Patients with psychocutaneous disorders often refuse psychiatric intervention in their first consultations, leaving initial management to the dermatologist. The use of psychotropic agents in dermatological practice, represented by antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, and mood stabilizers, should be indicated so that patients receive the most suitable treatment rapidly. It is important for dermatologists to be familiar with the most commonly used drugs for the best management of psychiatric symptoms associated with dermatoses, as well as to manage dermatologic symptoms triggered by psychiatric disorders.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Psychophysiologic Disorders/drug therapy , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Skin Diseases/psychology , Skin Diseases/drug therapy , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Risk Factors , Dermatology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL