Subject(s)
Group Purchasing/organization & administration , Organizational Affiliation , Ownership , Purchasing, Hospital/organization & administration , Contract Services/organization & administration , Cost Savings , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/economics , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Economic Competition , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/economics , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/supply & distribution , Group Purchasing/economics , Michigan , Purchasing, Hospital/economicsSubject(s)
Decision Making, Organizational , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Group Purchasing/organization & administration , Cost Control , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/economics , Group Purchasing/economics , Organizational Innovation , Purchasing, Hospital/economics , Purchasing, Hospital/organization & administration , Surgicenters/economics , Surgicenters/organization & administration , United StatesSubject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/statistics & numerical data , Group Purchasing/statistics & numerical data , Purchasing, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Cost Savings , Data Collection , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/economics , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Group Purchasing/economics , Group Purchasing/trends , Health Facility Merger/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Costs , Humans , Purchasing, Hospital/economics , Purchasing, Hospital/trends , United StatesABSTRACT
While purchasing giants Premier and VHA jockey for market share, signs show they're looking for competition in all the wrong places. Some of their own members, having merged into powerful regional systems, say they've built up the buying muscle capable of getting better deals from suppliers.
Subject(s)
Group Purchasing/trends , Purchasing, Hospital/trends , Contract Services , Cost Savings/methods , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Economic Competition/trends , Group Purchasing/economics , Health Care Coalitions , Health Care Sector , Multi-Institutional Systems , Purchasing, Hospital/economics , United StatesSubject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Hospital-Physician Joint Ventures/trends , Practice Management, Medical/trends , Data Collection , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/economics , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Health Care Sector , Hospital-Physician Joint Ventures/economics , Hospital-Physician Joint Ventures/statistics & numerical data , Information Systems , Investments , Ownership , Practice Management, Medical/economics , Practice Management, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Purchasing, Hospital/economics , Purchasing, Hospital/trends , United StatesABSTRACT
In today's changing healthcare marketplace, hospitals across the US are rapidly moving toward developing integrated healthcare delivery networks. In addition, the emergence of managed care and the growing trend toward capitation have compelled hospitals to reduce costs in response to these changes. Moreover, this impetus to provide quality care at reduced cost has affected the purchasing behavior of many hospitals, forcing material managers to pursue innovative procurement methods. This article describes how the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) Medical Center, (Charleston, SC) obtained significant savings in purchasing as a result of pioneering legislative reforms in the procurement process.
Subject(s)
Cost Savings/statistics & numerical data , Group Purchasing/legislation & jurisprudence , Materials Management, Hospital/economics , Purchasing, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Competitive Bidding/legislation & jurisprudence , Cost Savings/methods , Group Purchasing/economics , Hospitals, Public/legislation & jurisprudence , Hospitals, Public/organization & administration , Hospitals, University/legislation & jurisprudence , Hospitals, University/organization & administration , Materials Management, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Materials Management, Hospital/methods , Planning Techniques , Purchasing, Hospital/economics , Purchasing, Hospital/methods , South Carolina , State GovernmentABSTRACT
Over the last two decades we have witnessed the genesis of a rapidly consolidating market with nearly all healthcare providers now participating in a handful of purchasing organizations either alliance-based or major national GPOs. For a traditional GPO to survive, even thrive in today's rapidly consolidating customer environment, it needs to focus on five essential issues: negotiating agreements, electronically-formatted contract information, sales force and support staff, value-added programs, and equity ownership. This articles discusses these five issues giving suggestions for their implementation.
Subject(s)
Group Purchasing/organization & administration , Contract Services/economics , Contract Services/organization & administration , Cost Control , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/economics , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Economic Competition , Group Purchasing/economics , Guidelines as Topic , Negotiating , Ownership , Purchasing, Hospital/economics , Purchasing, Hospital/organization & administration , United StatesABSTRACT
In 1994 Brigham and Women's Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital joined forces to form Partners HealthCare System, Inc. (Boston, MA), an integrated healthcare delivery system. Both teaching affiliates of Harvard Medical School, the two hospitals comprise approximately 1,750 beds with 80,000 inpatient admissions and 1.3 million outpatient visits annually. The two campuses have over 16,000 employees in facilities covering 6.5 million square feet. The key goals of their partnership were to reduce cost and improve quality. Partners HealthCare System (PHS) set a goal to save $240 million in the first three years. These savings were to be achieved through consolidating departments and programs, adopting best practices between institutions, and wise purchasing. This article looks at the supplier partnering process followed by PHS to affect a guaranteed savings of $20 million.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Hospitals, Teaching/economics , Materials Management, Hospital/economics , Boston , Cost Savings , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/economics , Institutional Management Teams/economics , Materials Management, Hospital/organization & administration , Purchasing, Hospital/economicsSubject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Hospital-Physician Relations , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Purchasing, Hospital/economics , Decision Making, Organizational , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/standards , Diffusion of Innovation , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Family Practice/economics , Family Practice/trends , Organizational Innovation , Practice Management, Medical/trends , Primary Health Care/standards , Purchasing, Hospital/trends , United StatesSubject(s)
Capital Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Capital Financing/statistics & numerical data , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/economics , Capitation Fee , Data Collection , Hospital-Physician Joint Ventures/economics , Investments/economics , Ownership/statistics & numerical data , Practice Management, Medical/economics , Purchasing, Hospital/economics , Taxes , United StatesSubject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/economics , Group Purchasing/standards , Purchasing, Hospital/economics , Contract Services/economics , Contract Services/organization & administration , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Financial Audit , Group Purchasing/economics , Purchasing, Hospital/organization & administration , United StatesSubject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/legislation & jurisprudence , Practice Management, Medical/legislation & jurisprudence , Purchasing, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Taxes/legislation & jurisprudence , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/economics , Financial Audit , Fund Raising , Group Practice/economics , Group Practice/legislation & jurisprudence , Purchasing, Hospital/economics , United StatesABSTRACT
New equipment will continue to be purchased by the healthcare field. It is imperative that those who are considering equipment purchases keep in mind the various factors affecting our healthcare system today. With the increased cost of equipment and the increased risk that this equipment will not be financially successful, it is imperative that those purchasing the equipment be aware that successful adoption of equipment under the PPS will require that special consideration be given to the following: technologies, ability to enhance an integrated healthcare service, and its potential to serve as a cornerstone for a health service program.