ABSTRACT
AIMS: Approximately 70% of Americans with diabetes have used complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in the past year. Healthcare providers often receive minimal training on these therapies and subsequently rely on clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to supplement their knowledge about the safe and effective use of CAM for the treatment/management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The purpose of this systematic review is to determine the quantity and assess the quality of CAM recommendations in CPGs for the treatment and/or management of T2DM. DATA SYNTHESIS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL were systematically searched from 2009 to 2020, in addition to the Guidelines International Network and the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health websites. CPGs containing treatment and/or management recommendations for T2DM were eligible; those with CAM recommendations were quality-assessed with the AGREE II instrument twice, once for the overall CPG and once for the CAM sections. Twenty-seven CPGs were deemed eligible, of which 7 made CAM recommendations. Mean scaled domain percentages were (overall, CAM): scope and purpose (89.7%, 79.8%), clarity of presentation (85.7%, 48.4%), stakeholder involvement (67.9%, 28.2%), applicability (54.8%, 20.2%), rigour of development (49.7%, 35.7%), and editorial independence (44.1%, 44.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Quality varied within and across CPGs; domain scores across CAM sections generally scored lower than the overall CPG. Given that CAM therapies for T2DM are only represented in one-quarter of eligible CPGs and are of lower quality, a knowledge gap exists for healthcare providers who seek evidence-based information on this topic in order to effectively counsel inquiring patients.
Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies/standards , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards , Complementary Therapies/adverse effects , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , HumansABSTRACT
Electron dosimetry can be performed using cylindrical chambers, plane-parallel chambers, and diode detectors. The finite volume of these detectors results in a displacement effect which is taken into account using an effective point of measurement (EPOM). Dosimetry protocols have recommended a shift of 0.5 rcav for cylindrical chambers; however, various studies have shown that the optimal shift may deviate from this recommended value. This study investigated the effect that the selection of EPOM shift for cylindrical chamber has on percentage depth dose (PDD) curves. Depth dose curves were measured in a water phantom for electron beams with energies ranging from 6 to 18 MeV. The detectors investigated were of three different types: diodes (Diode-E PTW 60017 and SFD IBA), cylindrical (Semiflex PTW 31010, PinPoint PTW 31015, and A12 Exradin), and parallel plate ionization chambers (Advanced Markus PTW 34045 and Markus PTW 23343). Depth dose curves measured with Diode-E and Advanced Markus agreed within 0.2 mm at R50 except for 18 MeV and extremely large field size. The PDDs measured with the Semiflex chamber and Exradin A12 were about 1.1 mm (with respect to the Advanced Markus chamber) shallower than those measured with the other detectors using a 0.5 rcav shift. The difference between the PDDs decreased when a Pinpoint chamber, with a smaller cavity radius, was used. Agreement improved at lower energies, with the use of previously published EPOM corrections (0.3 rcav ). Therefore, the use of 0.5 rcav as an EPOM may result in a systematic shift of the therapeutic portion of the PDD (distances < R90 ). Our results suggest that a 0.1 rcav shift is more appropriate for one chamber model (Semiflex PTW 31010).
Subject(s)
Algorithms , Electrons/therapeutic use , Phantoms, Imaging , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiotherapy, High-Energy/instrumentation , Equipment Design , Humans , Monte Carlo Method , Radiotherapy Dosage , WaterABSTRACT
Background: Accreditation of educational programs involves an independent agency assessing quality against a set of defined standards. Site inspection teams are appointed by an accrediting agency and compile a report with the intention of identifying deficiencies and making recommendations for their rectification and continued improvement. For chiropractic programs accreditation is carried out by Councils on Chiropractic Education (CCEs). However, the reliability of their site inspection teams remains unknown. Recent research has suggested that variability in chiropractic practice may be partially traced back to the education provider. This raises the possibility of deficient accreditation procedures that may include unsatisfactory site inspection standards or processes or the accreditation standards by which they work to.We sought to compare the various CCEs documented standards and processes for site inspection teams for similarities and differences with the intent of making recommendations to create uniform and high quality standards. Further, we sought to compare a sample of CCEs site inspection team surveys / reports for commonly identified recommendations and quality improvements and determine if they are adequately described in their accreditation standards. Method: In December of 2018 invitation emails were sent to 4 CCEs through their website portals outlining a proposed study investigating site inspection teams' standards and processes. Access was requested to all appropriately redacted documentation relating to site inspection teams and their chiropractic program reports. Follow up emails were sent several weeks later. Results: Only one of four of the CCEs responded by providing the requested information. Conclusion and recommendations: Three CCEs did not cooperate with this educational research. The possible reasons for the non-engagement is discussed.
Subject(s)
Chiropractic/education , Chiropractic/standards , Accreditation/standards , Chiropractic/organization & administration , Humans , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Quality ImprovementABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cancer care is a complex care process and is associated with generating a variety of data during the care process. Therefore, it seems that designing and using information systems is necessary to enhance the accessibility, organization and management of cancer-related data. The aim of this study was to identify users' requirements of an oncology information system (OIS). METHODS: This was a qualitative study conducted in 2018. In depth semi-structured interviews were performed with clinicians and non-clinicians in five teaching hospitals to identify users' requirements. Data were analyzed by using framework analysis. RESULTS: The four themes emerged from data analysis included: a) methods of recording cancer data in the hospitals, b) required cancer data in different departments, c) comprehensive cancer care documentation, and d) required functions of an oncology information system. CONCLUSION: According to the results, currently, electronic documentation is less frequently used for cancer patients. Therefore, an extensive effort is needed to identify users' requirements before designing and implementing an oncology information system. As multidisciplinary teams are involved in cancer care, all potential users and their requirements should be taken into account. Such a system can help to collect and use cancer data effectively.
Subject(s)
Data Mining/methods , Health Information Systems/organization & administration , Health Information Systems/statistics & numerical data , Medical Records Systems, Computerized/standards , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , User-Computer Interface , Adult , Female , Health Personnel , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/pathology , Qualitative ResearchSubject(s)
Aftercare/standards , Cancer Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/standards , Models, Statistical , Neoplasms/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Child , Humans , Neoplasms/mortality , Prognosis , Survival RateABSTRACT
This review draws on the experience of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer clinicians from Australia, the United States, and the United Kingdom to summarize common aspects of models of care implemented in their countries. The principles underpinning these models include patient- and family-focused care informed by an understanding of normal AYA development, enhancing existing adult or pediatric cancer services to meet the needs of AYA, and promoting collaboration between pediatric and adult oncologists. Common elements of AYA cancer care include establishing an AYA multidisciplinary team that integrates medical and psychosocial care, efforts to centralize complex care, providing access and equity for all AYA, promoting clinical trials, and helping facilitate transition to healthy survivorship. Several organizational approaches are described, noting that local program development depends on resources, infrastructure, and assessment of unmet needs within the region. The development of national networks provides opportunities for shared learning and approaches to evaluation.
Subject(s)
Aftercare/standards , Cancer Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/standards , Models, Statistical , Neoplasms/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Humans , Neoplasms/mortality , Prognosis , Survival Rate , Young AdultSubject(s)
Heart Valve Diseases/therapy , Quality of Health Care/standards , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/standards , Heart Valve Diseases/diagnosis , Heart Valve Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Heart Valve Diseases/surgery , Humans , Mitral Valve/surgery , Models, Organizational , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/standardsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The goal of this work was to develop and test a cylindrical tissue-equivalent quality assurance (QA) phantom for micro computed tomography (microCT) image-guided small animal irradiators that overcomes deficiencies of existing phantoms due to its mouse-like dimensions and composition. METHODS: The 8.6-cm-long and 2.4-cm-diameter phantom was three-dimensionally (3D) printed out of Somos NeXt plastic on a stereolithography (SLA) printer. The modular phantom consisted of four sections: (a) CT number evaluation section, (b) spatial resolution with slanted edge (for the assessment of longitudinal resolution) and targeting section, (c) spatial resolution with hole pattern (for the assessment of radial direction) section, and (d) uniformity and geometry section. A Python-based graphical user interface (GUI) was developed for automated analysis of microCT images and evaluated CT number consistency, longitudinal and radial modulation transfer function (MTF), image uniformity, noise, and geometric accuracy. The phantom was placed at the imaging isocenter and scanned with the small animal radiation research platform (SARRP) in the pancake geometry (long axis of the phantom perpendicular to the axis of rotation) with a variety of imaging protocols. Tube voltage was set to 60 and 70 kV, tube current was set to 0.5 and 1.2 mA, voxel size was set to 200 and 275 µm, imaging times of 1, 2, and 4 min were used, and frame rates of 6 and 12 frames per second (fps) were used. The phantom was also scanned in the standard (long axis of the phantom parallel to the axis of rotation) orientation. The quality of microCT images was analyzed and compared to recommendations presented in our previous work that was derived from a multi-institutional study. Additionally, a targeting accuracy test with a film placed in the phantom was performed. MicroCT imaging of the phantom was also simulated in a modified version of the EGSnrc/DOSXYZnrc code. Images of the resolution section with the hole pattern were acquired experimentally as well as simulated in both the pancake and the standard imaging geometries. The radial spatial resolution of the experimental and simulated images was evaluated and compared to experimental data. RESULTS: For the centered phantom images acquired in the pancake geometry, all imaging protocols passed the spatial resolution criterion in the radial direction (>1.5 lp/mm @ 0.2 MTF), the geometric accuracy criterion (<200 µm), and the noise criterion (<55 HU). Only the imaging protocol with 200-µm voxel size passed the criterion for spatial resolution in the longitudinal direction (>1.5 lp/mm @ 0.2 MTF). The 70-kV tube voltage dataset failed the bone CT number consistency test (<55 HU). Due to cupping artifacts, none of the imaging protocols passed the uniformity test of <55 HU. When the phantom was scanned in the standard imaging geometry, image uniformity and longitudinal MTF were satisfactory; however, the CT number consistency failed the recommended limit. A targeting accuracy of 282 and 251 µm along the x- and z-direction was observed. Monte Carlo simulations confirmed that the radial spatial resolution for images acquired in the pancake geometry was higher than the one acquired in the standard geometry. CONCLUSIONS: The new 3D-printed phantom presents a useful tool for microCT image analysis as it closely mimics a mouse. In order to image mouse-sized animals with acceptable image quality, the standard protocol with a 200-µm voxel size should be chosen and cupping artifacts need to be resolved.
Subject(s)
Computer Simulation , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/instrumentation , Monte Carlo Method , Phantoms, Imaging , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Radiotherapy, Image-Guided/methods , X-Ray Microtomography/instrumentation , Animals , Equipment Design , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Printing, Three-Dimensional , Radiotherapy, Image-Guided/instrumentation , Signal-To-Noise RatioABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess current performance and identify opportunities and reforms necessary for positioning a food standards programme to help protect public health against dietary risk factors. DESIGN: A case study design in which a food standards programme's public health protection performance was analysed against an adapted Donabedian model for assessing health-care quality. The criteria were the food standards programme's structure (governance arrangements and membership of its decision-making committees), process (decision-making tools, public engagement and transparency) and food standards outcomes, which provided the information base on which performance quality was inferred. SETTING: The Australia and New Zealand food standards programme.ParticipantsThe structure, process and outcomes of the Programme. RESULTS: The Programme's structure and processes produce food standards outcomes that perform well in protecting public health from risks associated with nutrient intake excess or inadequacy. The Programme performs less well in protecting public health from the proliferation and marketing of 'discretionary' foods that can exacerbate dietary risks. Opportunities to set food standards to help protect public health against dietary risks are identified. CONCLUSIONS: The structures and decision-making processes used in food standards programmes need to be reformed so they are fit for purpose for helping combat dietary risks caused by dietary excess and imbalances. Priorities include reforming the risk analysis framework, including the nutrient profiling scoring criterion, by extending their nutrition science orientation from a nutrient (reductionist) paradigm to be more inclusive of a food/diet (holistic) paradigm.
Subject(s)
Diet , Government Programs , Nutrition Policy , Nutritive Value , Program Evaluation , Public Health , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Australia , Chronic Disease/prevention & control , Decision Making , Energy Intake , Feeding Behavior , Food , Food Labeling , Government , Humans , Marketing , New Zealand , Obesity/prevention & control , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In evaluating integrated care models, traditional quality measures do not account for functional and quality of life factors, affecting older adults with multiple chronic conditions. The objective of this study was the development and validation of the Flourish Index (FI), an instrument to evaluate integrated care, using a determinants of health model. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study took place within the evaluation study of the Flourish Model (FM). The FM provides care coordination services using an integrated primary care and community-based services model. Baseline data from 70 older adults were used in the validation study. Twenty-seven quality of care indicators within six determinants of health, namely biological, psychological, individual health behaviors, health services, environmental, and social, formed part of the FI. RESULTS: Categorical principal components analysis showed a 5-dimensional structure with psychological determinants loading on the biological determinants of health. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) for the determinants was as follows: biological/psychological = 0.73, individual = 0.58, environmental = 0.62, health services = 0.65, social = 0.67, total score = 0.97. Sensitivity to change was shown for the total FI score (F1,22 = 8.82, p = .01) and social (F1,22 = 5.82, p = .02), with a trend toward sensitivity for individual health behaviors (F1,22 = 3.95, p = .06) and health services (F1,22 = 3.26, p = .09). DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The preliminary analysis of the FI shows promise for the usability of the index to provide insight into the fundamental challenges of aging. It brings greater clarity in caring for older adults and supports quality evaluation of integrated care coordination models.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Aged , Community Health Services/organization & administration , Community Health Services/standards , Female , Health Status , Humans , Male , Models, Organizational , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Risk FactorsSubject(s)
Accreditation , Neurosurgery/education , Accreditation/legislation & jurisprudence , Career Choice , Clinical Competence/legislation & jurisprudence , Clinical Competence/standards , Curriculum/standards , France , Humans , National Health Programs , Neurosurgery/legislation & jurisprudence , Neurosurgery/statistics & numerical data , Neurosurgical Procedures/education , Neurosurgical Procedures/legislation & jurisprudence , Neurosurgical Procedures/standards , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Quality Assurance, Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Risk Factors , Societies, MedicalSubject(s)
Substance Abuse Treatment Centers/organization & administration , Substance Abuse Treatment Centers/standards , Substance-Related Disorders/rehabilitation , Adolescent , Child , Germany , Health Policy , Humans , National Health Programs/organization & administration , National Health Programs/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/organization & administration , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standardsABSTRACT
Quality assurance (QA) programmes are one of the mainstays of clinical research and constitute the pillars on which European Organisation for Research Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) delivers multidisciplinary therapeutic progress. Changing practice treatments require solid evidence-based data, which can only be achieved if integral QA is part of the infrastructure sustaining research projects. Cancer treatment is a multimodality approach, which is often applied either in sequence and/or in combination. Each modality plays a key role in cancer control. The modalities by which QA is applied varies substantially within and across the disciplines. In addition, translational and diagnostic disciplines take an increasing role in the era of precision medicine. Building on the structuring effect of clinical research with fully integrated multidisciplinary QA programmes associated with the solutions addressing the chain of custody for biological material and data integrity as well as compliance ensure at the same time validity of clinical research output but also have a training effect on health care providers, who are more likely to apply such principles as routine. The principles of QA are therefore critical to be embedded in multidisciplinary infrastructure to guarantee therapeutic progress. These principles also provide the basis for the functioning of multidisciplinary tumour board. However, technical, operational and economic challenges which go with the implementation of such programmes require optimal know-how and the coordination of the multiple expertise and such efforts are best achieved through centralised infrastructure.
Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/standards , Clinical Trials as Topic/standards , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/standards , Interdisciplinary Communication , Medical Oncology/standards , Patient Care Team/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards , Humans , Quality Improvement/standardsABSTRACT
ISSUE: Ultrasound is an integral part of imaging diagnostics but, unlike CT or MRI, requires the physician to have advanced technical skills for the implementation and documentation of studies. CURRENT SITUATION: Owing to poor remuneration and the large effort required, ultrasound is not a priority at many institutions, and compared to CT, MRI or interventions, little reward is given to those committed to ultrasound. Intense practical teaching is rarely given. As a result, residents have to teach themselves or gain experience during rotations outside radiology. In some cases, they are not educated at all. Only rarely do residents in radiology participate in certified ultrasound courses, compared to other clinical disciplines. ONGOING DEVELOPMENTS: (1) Standardized ultrasound curricula accompanying resident training, training focused on contrast-enhanced ultrasound, ultrasound-guided interventions, vascular ultrasound, and typical radiological applications of ultrasound like image fusion for biopsies or therapeutic interventions; (2) interdisciplinary ultrasound centers; (3) fostering of ultrasound education by the German Radiological Society (DRG) through intensive courses during the annual meeting. ACHIEVEMENTS: The above measures will help to increase skill and dexterity of radiologists in ultrasound, to introduce typical radiological applications of ultrasound into a broader field of applications and increase the awareness of these methods, and to strengthen the role of ultrasound in resident training. FUTURE REQUIREMENTS: (1) One senior radiologist in charge of ultrasound in each department; (2) communication of and adherence to examination and documentation standards; (3) demonstration of ultrasound studies during rounds and boards; (4) interdisciplinary centers for ultrasound education.
Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Graduate , Radiology/education , Ultrasonography , Clinical Competence/standards , Curriculum/standards , Documentation/standards , Education, Medical, Graduate/standards , Germany , Humans , National Health Programs , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Radiology/standards , Specialization , Ultrasonography/standardsABSTRACT
Un proceso asistencial integrado (PAI) es una herramienta cuyo propósito es aumentar la efectividad de las actuaciones clínicas a través de una mayor coordinación y garantía de continuidad asistencial. Los PAI sitúan al paciente como el eje central de la organización asistencial. Se definen como el conjunto de actividades que realizan los proveedores de la atención sanitaria con la finalidad de incrementar el nivel de salud y el grado de satisfacción de la población que recibe los servicios. La elaboración de un PAI precisa analizar el flujo de actividades, la interrelación entre profesionales y dispositivos asistenciales y las expectativas del paciente. En este artículo se presenta y se discute la metodología para la elaboración de un PAI, así como los factores de éxito para su definición y su efectiva implantación. Se explica también, a modo de ejemplo, el reciente PAI para hipoglucemias en personas con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 elaborado por un equipo multidisciplinar y avalado por varias sociedades científicas (AU)
An Integrated Healthcare Pathway (PAI) is a tool which has as its aim to increase the effectiveness of clinical performance through greater coordination and to ensure continuity of care. PAI places the patient as the central focus of the organisation of health services. It is defined as the set of activities carried out by the health care providers in order to increase the level of health and satisfaction of the population receiving services. The development of a PAI requires the analysis of the flow of activities, the inter-relationships between professionals and care teams, and patient expectations. The methodology for the development of a PAI is presented and discussed in this article, as well as the success factors for its definition and its effective implementation. It also explains, as an example, the recent PAI for Hypoglycaemia in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus developed by a multidisciplinary team and supported by several scientific societies (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Complementary Therapies/organization & administration , Complementary Therapies/standards , Patient Care/standards , Hypoglycemia/diagnosis , Hypoglycemia/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Quality Assurance, Health Care/organization & administration , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/prevention & control , Clinical ProtocolsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Serious mental illness (SMI) - which comprises long-term conditions such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and other psychoses - has enormous costs for patients and society. In many countries, people with SMI are treated solely in primary care, and have particular needs for physical care. AIM: The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature to create a list of quality indicators relevant to patients with SMI that could be captured using routine data, and which could be used to monitor or incentivise better-quality primary care. DESIGN AND SETTING: A systematic literature review, combined with a search of quality indicator databases and guidelines. METHOD: The authors assessed whether indicators could be measured from routine data and the quality of the evidence. RESULTS: Out of 1847 papers and quality indicator databases identified, 27 were included, from which 59 quality indicators were identified, covering six domains. Of the 59 indicators, 52 could be assessed using routine data. The evidence base underpinning these indicators was relatively weak, and was primarily based on expert opinion rather than trial evidence. CONCLUSION: With appropriate adaptation for different contexts, and in line with the relative responsibilities of primary and secondary care, use of the quality indicators has the potential to improve care and to improve the physical and mental health of people with SMI. However, before the indicators can be used to monitor or incentivise primary care quality, more robust links need to be established, with improved patient outcomes.
Subject(s)
Health Services Research , Mental Disorders/therapy , Primary Health Care , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Quality of Health Care/standards , Community Mental Health Services , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Humans , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/standards , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
The recent introduction by the central government of recovery plans (RPs) for Italian hospitals provides useful insights into the recentralization tendencies that are being experienced within the country's decentralized, regional health system. The measure also contributes evidence to the debate on whether there is a long-term structural shift in national health strategy towards more centralized stewardship. The hospital RPs aim to improve the clinical, financial and managerial performance of public-hospitals, teaching-hospitals and research-hospitals through monitoring trends in individual hospitals' expenditure and tackling improvements in clinical care. As such they represent the central governments recognition of the weaknesses of the decentralization process in the health sector. The opponents of the reform argue that financial stability will be restored mainly through across-the-board reductions in hospital expenditure, personnel layoffs and closing of wards, with considerable negative effects on the most vulnerable groups of patients. While hospital RPs are comprehensive and complex, unresolved issues remain as to whether hospitals have the necessary managerial skills for the development of effective and achievable plans. Without also devising an overall plan to tackle the long-standing managerial weaknesses of public hospitals, the objectives of the hospital RPs will be undermined and the decentralization process in the health system will gradually reach a dead-end.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Health Care Reform , Hospitals, Public/organization & administration , Politics , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Federal Government , Hospitals, Public/economics , Italy , National Health Programs/economics , National Health Programs/legislation & jurisprudence , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standardsABSTRACT
Quality assurance (QA) guidelines are essential to provide uniform execution of clinical trials with uniform quality hyperthermia treatments. This document outlines the requirements for appropriate QA of all current superficial heating equipment including electromagnetic (radiative and capacitive), ultrasound, and infrared heating techniques. Detailed instructions are provided how to characterize and document the performance of these hyperthermia applicators in order to apply reproducible hyperthermia treatments of uniform high quality. Earlier documents used specific absorption rate (SAR) to define and characterize applicator performance. In these QA guidelines, temperature rise is the leading parameter for characterization of applicator performance. The intention of this approach is that characterization can be achieved with affordable equipment and easy-to-implement procedures. These characteristics are essential to establish for each individual applicator the specific maximum size and depth of tumors that can be heated adequately. The guidelines in this document are supplemented with a second set of guidelines focusing on the clinical application. Both sets of guidelines were developed by the European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology (ESHO) Technical Committee with participation of senior Society of Thermal Medicine (STM) members and members of the Atzelsberg Circle.