ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ketamine is used in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols because of its beneficial antihyperalgesic and antitolerance effects. However, adverse effects such as hallucinations, sedation, and diplopia could limit ketamine's utility. The main objective of this study was to identify rates of ketamine side effects in postoperative patients after colorectal surgery and, secondarily, to compare short-term outcomes between patients receiving ketamine analgesia and controls. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational cohort study. Subjects were adults who underwent ERAS protocol-guided colorectal surgery at a large, integrated health system. Patients were grouped into ketamine-receiving and preketamine cohorts. Patients receiving ketamine were divided into tolerant and intolerant groups. Propensity score-adjusted models tested multivariate associations of ketamine tolerance/intolerance vs control group. RESULTS: A total of 732 patients underwent colorectal surgery within the ERAS program before ketamine's introduction (control). After ketamine's introduction, 467 patients received the medication. Intolerance was seen in 29% of ketamine recipients, and the most common side effect was diplopia. Demographics and surgical variables did not differ between cohorts. Multivariate models revealed no significant differences in hospital stays. Pain scores in the first 24 hours after surgery were slightly higher in patients receiving ketamine. Opiate consumption after surgery was lower for both ketamine tolerant and ketamine intolerant cohorts than for controls. CONCLUSION: Rates of ketamine intolerance are high, which can limit its use and potential effectiveness. Ketamine analgesia significantly reduced opiate consumption without increasing hospital stays after colorectal surgery, regardless of whether it was tolerated.
Subject(s)
Analgesics , Enhanced Recovery After Surgery , Ketamine , Pain, Postoperative , Humans , Ketamine/adverse effects , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Aged , Analgesics/adverse effects , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Drug Tolerance , Pain Measurement , Rectum/surgery , Propensity ScoreABSTRACT
Till the day the rectal cancer deaths in the world is in eighth position. For rectal cancer surgery, short-term benefits are expected to be similar for laparoscopic resection of rectum (LRR) and open resection of rectum (ORR). In Bangladesh though the rectal cancer is the sixteenth most common cause of cancer deaths, there is lack of data regarding outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgical approaches for carcinoma rectum. Purpose of study was to compare oncopathological outcomes by quality of surgical resection between LRR and ORR groups. The quasi experimental study was conducted among 46 subjects who attended in the Department of Colorectal Surgery, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Bangladesh from July 2020 to June 2021 with rectal adenocarcinoma within 15cm from the anal verge. Equal number of subjects were allocated for LRR and ORR group. Oncopathological end points such as circumferential resection margin (CRM), distal resection margin (DRM), lymph nodes and quality of mesorectal excision were assessed and compared. Here every patients have given their written consent for this study. Mean age of the subjects for LRR and ORR were 45.47±12.66 and 44.47±12.48 years respectively. Majority of the subjects were in age above 40 years (67.0%). The proportion of male (56.5%) were higher than those of female (43.5%). The complete resection was better in LRR (91.3%) than ORR (87.0%) group though statistically not significant. CRM was lower in LRR (0.0%) than ORR (13.0%) group in respect of frequency distribution. DRM was negative for both LRR and ORR group (95.7% each) and it was not statistically significant. ORR met the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria of harvesting 12 lymph nodes were as in LRR group 10 lymph nodes were harvested. The mean harvested lymph nodes were 12.2±5.55 and 10.1±5.55 in LRR and ORR group respectively. The study demonstrated that LRR is better (though statistically not significant) in respect of complete resection and CRM while in harvesting lymph nodes, ORR met the NCCN criteria but LRR does not. There is no difference observed regarding DRM in both groups. On oncopathological point of view both the group showed almost equally effective results. Laparoscopic surgery can be opted as the standard operative technique for surgical management of rectal cancer.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma , Laparoscopy , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Rectum/surgery , Margins of Excision , Treatment Outcome , Laparoscopy/methods , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma/pathologySubject(s)
Constipation , Defecation , Humans , Constipation/diagnosis , Rectum , Manometry , Anal Canal , Biofeedback, PsychologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Despite the initiation of minimally invasive laparoscopic techniques, the majority of patients who undergo anorectal malformation repair still experience functional bowel issues in childhood, including constipation and fecal incontinence. In this study, we evaluate the functional outcomes of a procedure in which magnetic resonance imaging guidance is used during initial laparoscopic repair to better locate the epicenter of the sphincter muscle complex and pelvic floor with the goal of more accurate placement of the neoanus and improved functional outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective chart review evaluated demographic, operative, and outcome details for patients who underwent this procedure. A telephone survey was employed to determine levels of social continence using the validated Baylor Continence Scale and to determine what type of bowel management is used. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were included. Median age at operation was 7 months, and median age at follow-up was 4 years old, with a range of 1-9. Bowel management regimen results revealed that 19 % (n = 5) use no bowel management regimen, 58 % (n = 15) use laxatives only, and 23 % (n = 6) use enemas. Enema use was not associated with different spine or sacral anomalies (p = 0.77). Fifteen patients (58 %) answered the Baylor Continence Scale questions and had a median score of 14. No difference was found in scores when accounting for lesion level (p = 0.43), quality of needle placement (p = 0.46), or quality of sphincter muscles (p = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: Using MRI guidance in the repair of anorectal malformations shows promise in both the qualitative and quantitative functional outcomes of this complex patient population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Subject(s)
Anorectal Malformations , Fecal Incontinence , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Anorectal Malformations/surgery , Fecal Incontinence/etiology , Infant , Child, Preschool , Treatment Outcome , Laparoscopy/methods , Follow-Up Studies , Constipation/etiology , Anal Canal/abnormalities , Anal Canal/surgery , Child , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Rectum/surgery , Rectum/abnormalities , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Enema/methods , Anus, Imperforate/surgery , Anus, Imperforate/diagnostic imaging , Laxatives/therapeutic use , Laxatives/administration & dosageABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: We discuss 10 cases where the qualitative evaluation of hard stool in the rectum with point-of-care ultrasound helped guide enema administration in a pediatric emergency department. Point-of-care ultrasound findings were especially valuable in cases where the presenting symptoms were undifferentiated, a language barrier was present, or the guardian and child denied that constipation was an active problem. When sodium phosphate enema administration was done in the pediatric emergency department, evacuation of the rectal stool burden was observed in most cases before final disposition.
Subject(s)
Constipation , Point-of-Care Systems , Child , Humans , Constipation/diagnostic imaging , Constipation/therapy , Enema , Rectum/diagnostic imaging , UltrasonographyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe the management of recurrent bowel endometriosis after previous colorectal resection. DESIGN: Surgical video article. The local institutional board review was omitted due to the narration of surgical management. Patient consent was obtained. SETTING: A tertiary referral center. The patient first underwent segmental bowel resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum in the ENDORE randomized controlled trial in 2012 and then received a total hysterectomy in 2018. Five years later, she presented with recurrent nodules in the rectovaginal, left parametrium, and abdominal wall after discontinuing medical suppressive treatment. INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic management using robotic assistance was employed to complete excision of the rectovaginal nodule. Disc excision was performed to remove rectal infiltration. The procedure started with rectal shaving and excision of vaginal infiltration . A traction stitch was placed over the limits of the rectal shaving area. The general surgeon placed a 28 mm circular anal stapler transanally and performed complete excision of the shaved rectal area. Anastomotic perfusion was checked with indocyanine green. A methylene blue enema test was conducted to rule out anastomotic leakage. Outcomes were favorable, with systematic self-catheterization during 5 postoperative weeks. No specific symptoms were related to the other 2 nodules, which were not removed. CONCLUSION: Rectal recurrences may occur long after colorectal resection and outside the limits of the previous surgery site. To accurately assess this risk, long-term follow-up of patients is mandatory.. Postoperative medical amenorrhea may play a role in recurrence prevention. Surgical management of recurrences may be challenging and focus on only those nodules responsible for symptoms so as to best preserve the organ's function and reduce postoperative morbidity.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Endometriosis , Laparoscopy , Rectal Diseases , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Female , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/etiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Rectal Diseases/etiology , Rectal Diseases/surgery , Rectum/surgery , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Nonoperative treatment of rectal cancer is gaining popularity. Several trials recently demonstrated advantages in disease-free survival with total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) with the addition of the watch and wait (WW) strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer. On longer follow-up, an unexpected increased risk in local recurrence in the TNT group at the RAPIDO trial suggested early surgery for nonresponding tumours. The WW option is globally accepted for a complete clinical response; however, a high rate of regrowth was found in a registry with an increased risk of distant metastases, questioning the deleterious effect of deferral of surgery in this group. The short- and long-term toxic effects of neoadjuvant treatment are costs to consider in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines compared with the European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines, which favour surgery alone if good mesorectal resection is assured with increasing surgical proficiency adjusted to the precise anatomical location.
Subject(s)
Rectal Neoplasms , Watchful Waiting , Humans , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectum/pathology , Disease-Free Survival , Chemoradiotherapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: MRI is the preferred imaging modality for primary staging of rectal cancer, used to guide treatment. Patients identified with clinical stage I disease receive upfront surgical resection; those with clinical stage II or greater undergo upfront neoadjuvant therapy. Although clinical under-/over-staging may have consequences for patients and presents opportunities for organ preservation, the correlation between clinical and pathologic staging in routine clinical practice within a single institute has not been fully established. METHODS: This retrospective, Institutional Review Board-approved study, conducted at a National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center with a multi-disciplinary rectal cancer disease center, included patients undergoing rectal MRI for primary staging January 1, 2018-August 30, 2020. Data collection included patient demographics, initial clinical stage via MRI report, pathologic diagnosis, pathologic stage, and treatment. The primary outcome was concordance of overall clinical and pathologic staging. Secondary outcomes included reasons for mismatched staging. RESULTS: A total 105 rectal adenocarcinoma patients (64 males, mean age 57 ± 12.7 years) had staging MRI followed by surgical resection. A total of 28 patients (27%) had mismatched under-/over- staging. Ten patients (10%) were understaged with mismatched T stage group (clinical stage I, pathologic stage II), five (5%) were understaged with mismatched N stage group (clinical stage I, pathologic stage III), and 13 (12%) were overstaged (clinical stage II-III, pathologic stage 0-I). Treatment matched concordance between clinical and pathologic stages was 86%. CONCLUSION: MRI for primary rectal cancer staging has high concordance with pathology. Future studies to assess strategies for reducing clinically relevant understaging would be beneficial.
Subject(s)
Rectal Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Rectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectum/diagnostic imaging , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for rectal neoplasia has gained wide acceptance, the mid-term and long-term outcomes are not widely reported in the literature. OBJECTIVE: Describe the mid-term outcomes of patients who underwent TAMIS for benign and malignant rectal lesions in a single center. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Demographic, clinical, and oncological outcomes of patients who underwent TAMIS between January 2015 and December 2022 were prospectively collected. The indication for TAMIS was based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. The follow up for the cancer patients included clinical examination, tumor markers every 6 months and MRI rectum at the end of one year. In addition, colonoscopy and CT scan at years one and three and a final CT scan and colonoscopy at year five. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mid-term oncological and clinical outcome. RESULTS: Thirty elective TAMIS procedures included adenocarcinoma for 33.3% (n=10) of the patients, 20% (n=6) neuroendocrine tumor and the 40% (n=12) were adenomatous lesions. Negative resection margins were achieved in all malignant lesions. Perioperative complications occurred in 2 patients (6.6%), one patient had breaching into the peritoneal cavity, and postoperative hypotension occurred in another patient. The median follow-up time was 23 months (range: 5-72 months). Two patients with adenoma and positive margins developed recurrent adenoma (6.6%) and one patient with initial polypectomy biopsy of adenocarcinoma, had TAMIS with histopathology of adenoma and distant metastasis had developed. CONCLUSIONS: TAMIS for local excision of rectal neoplasia is a valid option with favorable mid-term outcomes provided there is adherence to careful selection criteria. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective nature and small number of the patients.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Adenoma , Rectal Neoplasms , Transanal Endoscopic Surgery , Humans , Rectum/surgery , Rectum/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Transanal Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Adenoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Anal Canal/pathology , Anal Canal/surgeryABSTRACT
Radiation-induced intestinal injury is a radiation injury of the colon and rectum after radiotherapy for pelvic malignant tumors. This condition affects multiple organs in the pelvis, making treatment challenging. In clinical practice, the most effective protocol is often determined through discussion by a multi-disciplinary team (MDT). However, due to the severity and complexity of radiation enteritis, many patients still experience poor diagnosis and treatment outcomes. Holistic integrative management (HIM) is a rapidly developing concept that has greatly enhanced clinical medicine in recent years. It improves the level of diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation from multiple dimensions of prevention, screening, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation. In the context of radiation-induced intestinal injury, HIM also calls for the implementation of an individualized management system that focuses on the patient as a whole within the healthcare team. From the perspective of HIM, this article introduces some of the latest progress of radiation-induced intestinal injury in recent years.
Subject(s)
Enteritis , Pelvic Neoplasms , Radiation Injuries , Humans , Rectum , Treatment Outcome , Pelvic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiation Injuries/therapy , Patient Care TeamABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The peritoneum is a common metastatic site of colorectal cancer (CRC) and associated with worse oncological outcomes. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) has been shown to improve outcomes in selected patients. Studies have demonstrated significant difference in survival of patients with primary colon and rectal tumors both in local and in metastatic setting; but only few assessed outcomes of CRS/HIPEC for rectal and colon tumors. We studied the perioperative and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for rectal cancer. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database between 2009 and 2021 was performed. RESULTS: 199 patients underwent CRS/HIPEC for CRC. 172 patients had primary colon tumors and 27 had primary rectal tumors. Primary rectal location was associated with longer surgery (mean 4.32, hours vs 5.26 h, p = 0.0013), increased blood loss (mean 441cc vs 602cc, p = 0.021), more blood transfusions (mean 0.77 vs 1.37units, p = 0.026) and longer hospitalizations (mean 10 days vs 13 days, p = 0.02). Median disease-free survival (DFS) was shorter in rectal primary group; 7.03 months vs 10.9 months for colon primaries (p = 0.036). Overall survival was not statistically significant; 53.2 months for rectal and 60.8 months for colon primary tumors. Multivariate analysis indicated origin (colon vs rectum) and Peritoneal Cancer Index to be independently associated with DFS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with rectal carcinoma undergoing CRS/HIPEC for peritoneal metastasis had worse peri-operative and oncological outcomes. Overall survival was excellent in both groups. This data may be used for risk stratification when considering CRS/HIPEC for patients with rectal primary.
Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Hyperthermia, Induced , Peritoneal Neoplasms , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy , Peritoneum/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Peritoneal Neoplasms/secondary , Rectum/pathology , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures , Retrospective Studies , Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Survival Rate , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Effect of biofeedback on improving anorectal manometric parameters in incomplete spinal cord injury is unknown. A short-term biofeedback program investigated any effect on anorectal manometric parameters without correlation to bowel symptoms. METHODS: This prospective uncontrolled interventional study comprised three study subject groups, Group 1: sensory/motor-complete American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A SCI (n = 13); Group 2 (biofeedback group): sensory incomplete AIS B SCI (n = 17) (n = 3), and motor-incomplete AIS C SCI (n = 8), and AIS D SCI (n = 6); and Group 3: able-bodied (AB) controls (n = 12). High-resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM) was applied to establish baseline characteristics in all subjects for anorectal pressure, volume, length of pressure zones, and duration of sphincter squeeze pressure. SCI participants with motor-incomplete SCI were enrolled in pelvic floor/anal sphincter bowel biofeedback training (2 × 6-week training periods comprised of two training sessions per week for 30-45 min per session). HR-ARM was also performed after each of the 6-week periods of biofeedback training. RESULTS: Compared to motor-complete or motor-incomplete SCI participants, AB subjects had higher mean intra-rectal pressure, maximal sphincteric pressure, residual anal pressure, recto-anal pressure gradient, and duration of squeeze (p < 0.05 for each of the endpoints). No significant difference was evident at baseline between the motor-complete and motor-incomplete SCI groups. In motor-incomplete SCI subjects, the pelvic floor/anal sphincter biofeedback protocol failed to improve HR-ARM parameters. CONCLUSION: Biofeedback training program did not improve anal manometric parameters in subjects with motor-incomplete or sensory-incomplete SCI. Biofeedback did not change physiology, and its effects on symptoms are unknown. INFERENCES: Utility of biofeedback is limited in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury in terms of improving HR-ARM parameters.
Subject(s)
Fecal Incontinence , Spinal Cord Injuries , Humans , Anal Canal , Prospective Studies , Pelvic Floor , Rectum , Biofeedback, Psychology/methods , Manometry , Fecal Incontinence/etiology , Fecal Incontinence/therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To observe the effect of Dong's extraordinary point needling technique on postoperative complications of anal fistula. METHODS: A total of 241 patients undergoing anal fistula surgery were randomly divided into an observation group (121 cases, 3 cases dropped off) and a control group (120 cases, 2 cases dropped off). The patients in the control group were treated with intramuscular injection of compound diclofenac sodium injection and oral administration of tamsulosin hydrochloride sustained release capsules. In addition to the treatment in the control group, the patients in the observation group were treated with Daoma needling technique at the "Sanqi points" (Qimen point, Qijiao point, and Qizheng point) combined with Dongqi needling technique at "Sanhuang points" (sub-Tianhuang point, Dihuang point, Renhuang point), with each session lasting 30 min. The treatment in the two groups both started on the first day after surgery, and was given once daily for 14 consecutive days. Visual analog scale (VAS) score was compared between the two groups on postoperative day 1, 7, and 14; bladder residual urine volume, spontaneous voiding volume, and urinary catheterization frequency were assessed after treatment on postoperative day 1; and anorectal dynamic indexes (anal canal resting pressure, rectal resting pressure, maximum squeeze pressure of the anal canal, and minimum rectal sensory threshold) were evaluated before surgery and on postoperative day 4. Clinical efficacy was assessed in both groups one month after surgery. RESULTS: On postoperative day 7 and 14, the VAS scores of both groups were lower than those on postoperative day 1 (P<0.05), and the VAS scores in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The bladder residual urine volume and urinary catheterization frequency in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05), while the spontaneous voiding volume was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). On postoperative day 4, the anal canal resting pressure, maximum squeeze pressure of the anal canal, and the minimum rectal sensory threshold were lower than preoperative values (P<0.05), while the rectal resting pressure was higher than preoperative value (P<0.05) in both groups. The anal canal resting pressure, maximum squeeze pressure of the anal canal, and minimum rectal sensory threshold were lower than those in the control group, and the rectal resting pressure was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The effective rate was 93.2% (110/118) in the observation group, which was higher than 84.7% (100/118) in the control group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Dong's extraordinary point needling technique could reduce postoperative pain, alleviate urinary retention, and improve defecation in patients undergoing anal fistula surgery.
Subject(s)
Anus Diseases , Rectal Fistula , Humans , Rectum , Rectal Fistula/etiology , Rectal Fistula/surgery , Anal Canal/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Postoperative Complications/drug therapy , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Acupuncture PointsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hirschsprung's disease is a congenital disorder identified by the absence of ganglion cells at the Meissner's plexus of the submucosa and Auerbach's plexus of the muscularis. This disease can be found in approximately 1 in 5000 live births. It is a congenital disorder that is rarely diagnosed in adults, where 95% of cases are diagnosed in infants aged under 1 year old. Here we present a rare case of adult Hirschsprung's disease to enrich the body of knowledge in diagnosing adult patients with chronic refractory constipation symptoms. CASE REPORT: An 18-year-old Indonesian woman came to the general surgery department of Unggul Karsa Medika Teaching Hospital with a defecating problem (constipation) since childhood. There was no history of her passage of meconium. A contrast enema study showed that the sigmoid colon was dilated and the rectum was narrowed, with rectosigmoid index < 1. With these findings, it was suspected that the patient may have ultra-short segment Hirschsprung's disease. The patient was then referred to the digestive surgery department of referral hospital for surgical treatment. CONCLUSION: In adult patients presenting with history of constipation since childhood, it is necessary to consider the possibility of Hirschsprung's disease that was not diagnosed in early childhood. Hirschsprung's disease in adults is usually a short or ultra-short aganglionic segment because it shows relatively mild symptoms. Surgical removal of the aganglionic segment of the gut is the definitive treatment for Hirschsprung's disease.
Subject(s)
Hirschsprung Disease , Infant , Female , Humans , Adult , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Hirschsprung Disease/complications , Hirschsprung Disease/diagnosis , Hirschsprung Disease/surgery , Constipation/etiology , Rectum/diagnostic imaging , Colon, Sigmoid , BiopsyABSTRACT
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic, non-specific disease of unknown etiology. The disease develops mainly in the rectum or colon, and the main clinical symptoms include abdominal pain, diarrhea, and purulent bloody stools, with a wide variation in severity. The specific causative factors and pathogenesis of the disease are not yet clear, but most scholars believe that the disease is caused by the interaction of genetic, environmental, infectious, immune, and intestinal flora factors. As for the treatment of UC, medications are commonly used in clinical practice, mainly including aminosalicylates, glucocorticoids, and immunosuppressive drugs. However, due to the many complications associated with conventional drug therapy and the tendency for UC to recur, there is an urgent need to discover new, safer, and more effective drugs. Natural compounds with biodiversity and chemical structure diversity from medicinal plants are the most reliable source for the development of new drug precursors. Evidence suggests that glycosides may reduce the development and progression of UC by modulating anti-inflammatory responses, inhibiting oxidative stress, suppressing abnormal immune responses, and regulating signal transduction. In this manuscript, we provide a review of the epidemiology of UC and the available drugs for disease prevention and treatment. In addition, we demonstrate the protective or therapeutic role of glycosides in UC and describe the possible mechanisms of action to provide a theoretical basis for preclinical studies in drug development.
Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative , Humans , Animals , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Colitis, Ulcerative/pathology , Glycosides/therapeutic use , Glycosides/pharmacology , Colon , Immunosuppressive Agents/pharmacology , Rectum , Disease Models, AnimalABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To assess the number, characteristics, and functional short-, and midterm outcomes of patients with rectal atresia (RA) and stenosis (RS) in the ARM-Net registry. METHODS: Patients with RA/RS were retrieved from the ARM-Net registry. Patient characteristics, associated anomalies, surgical approach, and functional bowel outcomes at 1 and 5-year follow-up were assessed. RESULTS: The ARM-Net registry included 2619 patients, of whom 36 (1.3%) had RA/RS. Median age at follow-up was 7.0 years (IQR 2.3-9.0). Twenty-three patients (63.9%, RA n = 13, RS n = 10) had additional anomalies. PSARP was the most performed reconstructive surgery for both RA (n = 9) and RS (n = 6) patients. At 1-year follow-up, 11/24 patients with known data (45.8%, RA n = 5, RS n = 6) were constipated, of whom 9 required stool softeners and/or laxatives. At 5-year follow-up, 8/9 patients with known data (88.9%, RA n = 4, RS n = 4) were constipated, all requiring laxatives and/or enema. CONCLUSION: RA and RS are rare types of ARM, representing 1.3% of patients in the ARM-Net registry. Additional anomalies were present in majority of patients. Different surgical approaches were performed as reconstructive treatment, with constipation occurring in 46% and 89% of the patients at 1 and 5-year follow-up. However, accurate evaluation of long-term functional outcomes remains challenging.
Subject(s)
Anorectal Malformations , Rectal Diseases , Humans , Child, Preschool , Child , Rectum/surgery , Rectum/abnormalities , Laxatives , Constriction, Pathologic/surgery , Rectal Diseases/surgery , Anorectal Malformations/epidemiology , Anorectal Malformations/surgery , Constipation , Anal Canal/abnormalities , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) remains the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). This phase 2 clinical trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant triplet chemotherapy with mFOLFOXIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) in LARC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patients with LARC (the lower edge more than 5 cm from the anal verge) received up to 5 cycles of mFOLFOXIRI. MRI was performed to assess the baseline and postchemotherapy TN stage. Radical resection was performed within 4-6 weeks from the last dose of chemotherapy if the tumor shrank or remained stable. Adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 or XELOX was recommended. Postoperative radiation was planned for R1 resection, ypT4b, ypN2 and a positive CRM. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. RESULTS: From February 2016 to March 2019, 50 patients were enrolled. Forty-eight (96%) were clinically node-positive, 28 (56.5%) with MRF invasion and 39 (78.4%) were EMVI positive. The median cycle of neoadjuvant mFOLFOXIRI chemotherapy was 5 (range,1-5). A total of 46/50 (92%) patients underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery, all with R0 resection. The pCR rate was 4.3% (2/46). Twenty-three of 46 (50%) patients with cN + achieved a pathological node-negative status. The proportions of pathologically positive CRM and EMVI were 2.2% and 34.7%, respectively. Adjuvant radiotherapy was given to 14/46 (30.4%) patients. The most common Grade 3 or > toxicities included neutrocytopenia (50%), leukopenia (14%) and diarrhea (12%) during the neoadjuvant chemotherapy period. Clinically meaningful postoperative complications included pneumonia (n = 1), pelvic infection (n = 1) and anastomotic fistula (n = 1). With a median follow-up time of 51.2 months, local recurrences and distant metastases were confirmed in 3 (6.5%) and 9 (19.6%) of cases, respectively. The 3-year disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS)rates were 75.8% and 86.8%. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOXIRI yielded a significant down-staging effect and seemed to be effective in eliminating EMVI and transforming the positive MRF to negative in LARC. The survival results are promising. The long-term follow-up showed promising DFS and OS rates accompanied by a favorable safety profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03443661, 23/02/2018.
Subject(s)
Neoadjuvant Therapy , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Treatment Outcome , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Rectum/pathology , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Fluorouracil , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Neoplasm StagingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Anorectal manometry (ARM) is a comprehensive diagnostic tool for evaluating patients with constipation, fecal incontinence, or anorectal pain; however, it is not widely utilized for reasons that remain unclear. The aim of this roundtable discussion was to critically examine the current clinical practices of ARM and biofeedback therapy by physicians and surgeons in both academic and community settings. METHODS: Leaders in medical and surgical gastroenterology and physical therapy with interest in anorectal disorders were surveyed regarding practice patterns and utilization of these technologies. Subsequently, a roundtable was held to discuss survey results, explore current diagnostic and therapeutic challenges with these technologies, review the literature, and generate consensus-based recommendations. RESULTS: ARM identifies key pathophysiological abnormalities such as dyssynergic defecation, anal sphincter weakness, or rectal sensory dysfunction, and is a critical component of biofeedback therapy, an evidence-based treatment for patients with dyssynergic defecation and fecal incontinence. Additionally, ARM has the potential to enhance health-related quality of life and reduce healthcare costs. However, it has significant barriers that include a lack of education and training of healthcare providers regarding the utility and availability of ARM and biofeedback procedures, as well as challenges with condition-specific testing protocols and interpretation. Additional barriers include understanding when to perform, where to refer, and how to use these technologies, and confusion over billing practices. CONCLUSIONS: Overcoming these challenges with appropriate education, training, collaborative research, and evidence-based guidelines for ARM testing and biofeedback therapy could significantly enhance patient care of anorectal disorders.
Subject(s)
Fecal Incontinence , Rectal Diseases , Humans , Fecal Incontinence/diagnosis , Fecal Incontinence/therapy , Defecation/physiology , Quality of Life , Manometry/methods , Constipation/diagnosis , Constipation/therapy , Rectum/physiology , Rectal Diseases/diagnosis , Rectal Diseases/therapy , Anal Canal , Biofeedback, Psychology/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Anastomotic stenosis is a common complication of colorectal surgery with anastomosis. To explore a minimally invasive novel approach surgical method for the treatment of rectal anastomotic strictures using transurethral prostate resection instrumentation. METHODS: From 2012 to 2022, 18 patients for the treatment of rectal anastomotic strictures using transurethral prostate resection instrumentation. The transurethral prostate resection instrumentation enters the rectum through the anus to incise the narrow anastomotic orifice in a 4-point radial manner under the resectoscope. RESULTS: The surgery was successfully completed in 18 patients, and there were no postoperative complications. Postoperatively, 12 patients achieved satisfactory improvement in defecation after 1 incision, and 4 patients underwent another incision 3 months later. Two patients underwent incisions thrice, and the ease of defecation improved in a short period; however, they later underwent permanent colostomy due to repeated stenosis and pain. CONCLUSION: The transanal 4-point radial incision of the prostate using transurethral prostate resection instrumentation is a minimally invasive, safe, effective, and simple surgical method for the treatment of rectal anastomotic stenosis supplemented by postoperative dilatation, and is worthy of clinical application.
Subject(s)
Rectal Neoplasms , Transurethral Resection of Prostate , Male , Humans , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Constriction, Pathologic/etiology , Constriction, Pathologic/surgery , Transurethral Resection of Prostate/adverse effects , Rectum/surgery , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effectsABSTRACT
A 66-year-old Japanese man was referred to our hospital with myalgia and muscle weakness. He had a history of rectal cancer, which invaded into the urinary bladder and ileum and was treated with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, resection of the rectum, colostomy, and ileal conduit construction. He showed recurrent markedly elevated serum creatine kinase levels and concurrent hypocalcemia. Muscle magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated abnormal signals in the proximal limb muscles, and needle electromyography showed myopathic changes. Further examination revealed hypomagnesemia and hyposelenemia with underlying short bowel syndrome. Calcium, magnesium and selenium supplementation improved his symptoms and laboratory findings.