Successful treatment of refractory pure red cell aplasia with eltrombopag after ABO-incompatible allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) is a well-recognized complication of ABO major mismatched allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), with a reported incidence of 10%-20% (Zhidong et al., 2012; Busca et al., 2018). It is clinically characterized by anemia, reticulocytopenia, and the absence of erythroblasts in a normal-appearing bone marrow biopsy (Shahan and Hildebrandt, 2015). The mechanism for PRCA has been presumed to be persistence of recipient isoagglutinins, produced by residual host B lymphocytes or plasma cells, which can interfere with the engraftment of donor erythroid cells (Zhidong et al., 2012). Several risk factors of PRCA at presentation are known, such as presence of anti-A isoagglutinins before transplantation, reduced intensity conditioning, absence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), sibling donors, and cyclosporin A (CsA) as GVHD prophylaxis (Hirokawa et al., 2013). PRCA is not considered to be a barrier to HSCT, as some patients can recover spontaneously or benefit from various approaches including high-dose steroids, erythropoietin (EPO), plasma exchange, immunoadsorption, donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), treatment with rituximab, bortezomib, or daratumumab, and tapering or discontinuation of immunosuppression (Hirokawa et al., 2013; Bathini et al., 2019). However, there are still some patients who fail to respond even to aggressive treatment; they become red cell transfusion-dependent and iron-overloaded, and their life quality is impaired.

Efficacy prospective study of different frequencies of Epo administration by i.v. and s.c. routes in renal replacement therapy patients.

BACKGROUND: The problem of pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) prompted nephrologists to revert to a wider intravenous (i.v.) utilization of erythropoeitin (Epo). Once weekly i.v. Epo administration has been suggested to be as effective as the twice/thrice weekly i.v. dose. The aim of the present study was to test whether once weekly i.v. Epo administration is equally as cost-effective as once weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) and 2-3 times weekly i.v. administration. METHODS: We prospectively studied 41 patients (23 males, aged 28-82 years), on renal replacement therapy for 18-286 months, stabilized on twice or thrice weekly s.c. Epo-alpha (basal). The patients were treated for three consecutive 6 month periods with once weekly s.c. (OWSC), once weekly i.v. (OWIV) and twice/thrice weekly i.v. (TWIV) Epo-alpha. The initial dose for each period was equal to the final dose of the previous one; when necessary, the dose was adjusted according to DOQY guidelines. Iron, folic acid and vitamin B(12) supplementations were given throughout all the study periods. At the end of each of the four study periods, the following parameters were evaluated: haemoglobin, haematocrit, hypochromic red blood cells (RBCs), iron, serum ferritin, transferrin, folate, vitamin B(12), C-reactive protein (CRP), Kt/V, parathyroid hormone (PTH) and weekly dose of Epo-alpha. RESULTS: Thirty-three out of 41 enrolled patients completed the study (there were five deaths, two renal transplants and one transfer). No significant changes were observed as regards iron, serum ferritin, transferrin, folate, vitamin B(12), CRP, Kt/V or PTH level. Haemoglobin levels were not different at the end of the basal (11.7+/-1.21), OWSC (11.8+/-0.86) and TWIV (12.1+/-1.04) periods, while significantly lower levels were observed after the OWIV period (11.0+/-0.97, P<0.01). Weekly Epo consumption (Epo U/week/kg body weight/g haemoglobin) was: basal 11.57+/-5.96; OWSC 10.22+/-4.53; OWIV 15.99+/-7.7*(a); and TWIV 11.89+/-6.3*(a) (*P<0.01 vs basal; (a)P<0.01 vs OWSC). CONCLUSIONS: From our results, the OWIV schedule seems to have less efficacy in the control of anaemia of chronic renal failure patients on dialysis treatment than either OWSC or TWIV schedules.

Ciprofloxacin, but not levofloxacin, affects cyclosporine blood levels in a patient with pure red blood cell aplasia.

A 38-year-old man diagnosed with pure red blood cell aplasia was undergoing treatment with cyclosporine 200 mg/day. On day 41, the cyclosporine dose was increased to 250 mg/day. On day 45, the patient was hospitalized with fever, and ciprofloxacin 200 mg IV tid was begun. The level of cyclosporine was 297 ng/mL, which obliged us to reduce cyclosporine to 200 mg/day. On day 59, ciprofloxacin was discontinued. On day 80, the patient was hospitalized with fever, and levofloxacin 500 mg/d IV was begun. The patient was continued on cyclosporine 250 mg/day. On day 90, levofloxacin was discontinued. The cyclosporine dose-to-blood level ratio was maintained constant in subsequent controls. In this patient, the substantial and sustained increase in cyclosporine blood levels after ciprofloxacin was added to the patient's therapy and the decrease in cyclosporine blood levels after the withdrawal of ciprofloxacin suggest a potential interaction. Levofloxacin therapy could be a therapeutic alternative, although pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies should be conducted.

Pure red cell aplasia following pernicious anemia.

A rare case of pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) in association with pernicious anemia is reported. A 40-year-old man presented with typical clinical and laboratory features of pernicious anemia and received intramuscular injections of vitamin B12, with satisfactory response. Anemia recurred 6 months later despite continued therapy, and the patient was noted to have PRCA, which was treated successfully with two courses of high-dose bolus methylprednisolone therapy. His peripheral mononuclear cells before the therapy suppressed colony formation of early erythroid precursors (BFU-E) from normal bone marrow; such a suppressive effect was not found after recovery from anemia.